We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Osteoporosis is a chronic and progressive disease leading to gradual deterioration of skeletal tissue, which predisposes the sufferer to an increased risk of fracture, deformity, disability and even premature death. The growth of this ‘silent epidemic’ is projected to escalate worldwide with the changing demographics of an ageing population. Recent reviews have highlighted the frequency of missed opportunities for secondary prevention following a fracture, though these reported on practice in the mid-1990s when pharmacologic approaches to fracture reduction were in transition.
Aim
This review examines the current body of literature regarding the investigation of osteoporosis and prescribing of secondary bone prevention medication in older patients following fragility fractures.
Method
A standard Boolean search framework was used to find all pertinent studies on the literature review question. A further set of results was obtained using a ‘snowballing’ technique by pursuing references of the initial studies and reviews found. As the aim was to determine if there have been changes in prescription rates in elderly patients in the light of new guidelines, studies were excluded if they had featured in recent systematic reviews.
Findings
The consistently low intervention rates reported in all included studies provide evidence that elderly individuals who experience fragility fractures are still not receiving adequate investigation or treatment for osteoporosis. Furthermore, this review has identified the potential for future research to describe the true extent of this problem in the UK.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.