Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 17 - Towards a New Privacy

  • Edited by Edward S. Dove, University of Edinburgh, Niamh Nic Shuibhne, University of Edinburgh
  • Book:
    Law and Legacy in Medical Jurisprudence
    Published online:
    23 December 2021
    Print publication:
    10 March 2022, pp 367-390

  • Summary

    This chapter considers the legacy of respect for individual autonomy and ‘informed consent’ in health research. The primacy of informed consent as a safeguard has led to a systemic regulatory tendency to conceive of and protect privacy as an individual rather than a collective concern. This has limited any regulatory ability to grasp broader social concerns with the use and disclosure of data gathered and generated by health research. Any systemic failure to recognise collective interests in data, and the public interest in (non-personal) data protection, has profound implications for an information age. The chapter reflects on the value of re-negotiating the interests and expectations protected by health research regulation. It recognises the significance of Graeme Laurie’s preferred conception of privacy to enabling such negotiation, and the value of stewardship in establishing normative expectations free of historical encumbrance. Laurie’s conceptualisation of ‘privacy as separateness’, when placed alongside the idea of stewardship, may allow us to rebalance respect to encompass collective interests as fundamental to self-determination and mutual respect.

  • Together and apart: a typology of re-partnering in old age

  • Chaya Koren
  • Journal:
    International Psychogeriatrics / Volume 26 / Issue 8 / August 2014
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    23 April 2014, pp. 1327-1350
  • Background:

    The human need for love, friendship, and physical contact, and the fear of loneliness do not diminish with age. Widowhood and late-life divorce and increased life expectancy are likely to lead to alternative relationships, such as re-partnering. The purpose of this paper is to explore interplays between emotional and physical components of re-partnering in old age

    Methods:

    Theoretical sampling of 20 couples included men who re-partnered at the age of 65+ years and women at the age of 60+ years, following termination of lifelong marriages due to death or divorce. Living arrangements included married or unmarried cohabitation under the same roof or in separate homes. Forty semi-structured interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The couple was the unit of analysis.

    Results:

    Interplays between physical and emotional dimensions were examined using five abductive parameters derived from data analysis resulting in a fourfold typology of emotional and physical closeness/distance in re-partnering in old age: (1) living together (physically and emotionally); (2) living apart (physically) together (emotionally); (3) living together (physically) apart (emotionally); and (4) living apart (physically and emotionally).

    Conclusions:

    Findings revealed types of partner relationships that are different from lifelong marriages. The typology could help professionals working with older persons regarding what to expect in re-partnering in old age and be included in developmental theories as an option in old age. A quantitative tool for research and therapy purposes, entitled The Re-partnering in Old Age Typology Scale (RPOAT Scale), based on abductive parameters, could be established for measuring re-partnering relationship quality and classifying re-partnering couples.