We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines narrative representations of slavery in early monasticism. It then reads these accounts in light of extant material remains and in conversation with prescriptive regulatory precepts. Such contextualisation necessarily situates emergent communities within a late-Roman world where ‘attitudes of slaveholders [remained] constant’ and the ‘conditions in which slaves lived and worked persisted from generation to generation’ (Glancy). As the cracks and fissures routinely glossed over in more seamless depictions underscore the degree to which monastic ideals and ideologies, institutional and relational norms, remain inextricably intertwined with wider Greco-Roman practice, the chapter posits that emergent monastic mores may be best understood as at once dismantling and reinscribing the structural hierarchies of slavery. Against this landscape, where the jagged edges of lived experience remain patent, the chapter simultaneously premises reconceptualisations that effectively disrupt both static idealisation and wholesale denigration. Through engaging reading strategies that resist the limitations implicit to binaried definitions of practice, its aim is to breathe life into the larger than life.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.