Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 14 - Conclusion

  • from Part III
  • Stephen Winter, University of Auckland
  • Book:
    Monetary Redress for Abuse in State Care
    Published online:
    18 November 2022
    Print publication:
    01 December 2022, pp 236-248
    • Chapter
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Summary

    Better redress programmes demand local ownership and participation. Redress programmes always involve trade-offs between competing values; therefore, decisions about programme design and operations are likely to be better made when those decisions include those most closely affected. This concluding chapter underlines the argument for flexible programmes that enable survivors to control their journeys through the redress process. In closing, I outline the potential benefits of providing monetary redress as part of a holistic suite of remedial policies.