We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter provides an overview of the curriculum and modes of instruction within the Neapolitan conservatory curriculum. It focuses specifically on the instructional methods of solfeggio and partimento, drawing on exercises found in surviving eighteenth-century Neapolitan sources. It also considers larger historical contexts such as the diverse approaches of Francesco Durante and Leonardo Leo, whose students have been labeled as “Durantisti” and “Leisti.” Contemporary scholarship on the topics of solfeggio and partimento are also considered – in particular, the work of Robert Gjerdingen and Peter van Tour. The pedagogical importance of the conservatory curriculum served as the basis for a broad, diverse skill set, and the educational methodologies of the conservatories served as the foundation for prevailing stylistic unities derived from techniques learned in these institutions. The emergence of specific shared performance practices, compositional strategies, and broad parameters of style was closely associated with Neapolitan music in the eighteenth century and was widely discussed by contemporary and subsequent sources.
The music of early modern Naples and its renowned artistic traditions remain a fruitful area for scholars in eighteenth-century studies. Contemporary social, political, and artistic conditions had stimulated a significant growth of music, musicians and culture in the Kingdom of Naples from the beginning of the seventeenth century. Although eighteenth-century Neapolitan opera is well documented in scholarship, historians have paid much less attention to the simultaneous cultivation of instrumental genres. Yet the culture of instrumental music grew steadily and by its end became an exclusive area of focus for the royal court, a remarkable departure from past norms of patronage. By bridging this gap, Anthony R. DelDonna brings together diverse fields, including historical musicology, music theory, Neapolitan and European history. His book investigates the wide-ranging role of instrumental genres within late eighteenth-century Neapolitan culture and introduces readers to new material, including recently discovered instrumental works of Paisiello, Cimarosa and Pleyel.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.