We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
R. A. Bailey, University of St Andrews, Scotland,Peter J. Cameron, University of St Andrews, Scotland,Yaokun Wu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix of a graph have been widely used in studying connectivity and expansion properties of networks, and also in analyzing random walks on a graph. Independently, statisticians introduced various optimality criteria in experimental design, the goal being to obtain more accurate estimates of quantities of interest in an experiment. It turns out that the most popular of these optimality criteria for block designs are determined by the Laplacian eigenvalues of the concurrence graph, or of the Levi graph, of the design. The most important optimality criteria, called A (average), D (determinant) and E (extreme), are related to the conductance of the graph as an electrical network, the number of spanning trees, and the isoperimetric properties of the graphs, respectively. The number of spanning trees is also an evaluation of the Tutte polynomial of the graph, and is the subject of the Merino–Welsh conjecture relating it to acyclic and totally cyclic orientations, of interest in their own right. This chapter ties these ideas together, building on the work in [4] and [5].
We show that for any $\varepsilon \gt 0$ and $\Delta \in \mathbb{N}$, there exists $\alpha \gt 0$ such that for sufficiently large $n$, every $n$-vertex graph $G$ satisfying that $\delta (G)\geq \varepsilon n$ and $e(X, Y)\gt 0$ for every pair of disjoint vertex sets $X, Y\subseteq V(G)$ of size $\alpha n$ contains all spanning trees with maximum degree at most $\Delta$. This strengthens a result of Böttcher, Han, Kohayakawa, Montgomery, Parczyk, and Person.
We prove that for a discrete determinantal process the BK inequality occurs for increasing events generated by simple points. We also give some elementary but nonetheless appealing relationships between a discrete determinantal process and the well-known CS decomposition.
We consider the number of spanning trees in circulant graphs of ${\it\beta}n$ vertices with generators depending linearly on $n$. The matrix tree theorem gives a closed formula of ${\it\beta}n$ factors, while we derive a formula of ${\it\beta}-1$ factors. We also derive a formula for the number of spanning trees in discrete tori. Finally, we compare the spanning tree entropy of circulant graphs with fixed and nonfixed generators.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.