Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

3 results

  • 43 - Delegated legislation

  • from Part VIII - Special interpretative issues
  • Jeffrey Barnes, La Trobe University, Victoria, Jacinta Dharmananda, University of Western Australia, Perth, Eamonn Moran
  • Book:
    Modern Statutory Interpretation
    Published online:
    05 January 2023
    Print publication:
    10 January 2023, pp 666-684

  • Summary

    [43.1] Most Acts include a section empowering the making of other instruments under the Act. Such instruments, when of a legislative character, are known as delegated legislation. A wide variety of terms is used across Australian jurisdictions to describe delegated legislation.

  • 6 - Combination

  • from Part II - The Model
  • C. H. Tham, Singapore Management University
  • Book:
    Understanding the Law of Assignment
    Published online:
    10 October 2019
    Print publication:
    17 October 2019, pp 127-150

  • Summary

    This chapter explains how, by combining the trust with the ‘agency’ effects described in the previous chapters, the difficulties of each doctrine, operating in isolation, are overcome, In particular, this chapter explains how, through combination, the agency aspect of equtiable assignment becomes irrevocable; how the usual rule of agency that an agent may not sub-delegate is reversed; how substantial damages may be recovered by the assignee in right of the assignor;and how double liability of the assignor may be avoided, in part, through legislative intervention in the form of Common Law Procedure Act 1854, section 83.;