We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter considers two competing views about what modularity might consist of, which the authors refer to as sui generis modularity and descent-with-modification modularity. Descent-with-modification helps make sense of the considerable phylogenetic continuity that has been documented in recent years, in terms of comparative psychology, comparative neuroanatomy, and comparative genomics. The chapter also considers language, the canonical putative module, and its relation to cognitive systems. Cognitive mechanisms for spatial and temporal representation seem to run deeply through the structure of the linguistic system. The notion of descent-with-modification, once recognized, has significant implications for how one can assesses debates about modularity. The descent-with-modification perspective suggests caution for inferring the absence of modularity from many studies of "normal" cognition. Descent-with-modification also suggests that one should expect the hallmarks of ancestry even in the very machinery that makes abstract linguistic representation possible.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.