Systemic family therapy as psychosocial intervention is focused on family on the whole.It is considered that multidimensional approach is the most appropriate way of treatment.

We described psychoeducative working model in work with families with young schizophrenic member, aged 20-30years. We worked simultaneusly and paralelly with five families each, total 15 families, in form of network seances lasting 1,5 to 2 hours, during period of three months.Data were obtained through interview and unstandardized test questionnaires - beginning and evaluation one.

We got expected results, meaning that complete disfunctionality of actual organisation was confirmed. The feelings of helplesness, shame, guilt, uncertain future and anxiety prevails. Identified patient is central point, he/she occupies the top of hierarchy scale. Families have diffuse internal subsystem borders, rigidity of outer borders, and many alliances, triangles and coalitions.In communication there is no directivnes, and there is a presence of paradox, avoiding, denial, and emotional exchange varied from network to extremely distant.

Based on responses from our evaluation questionnaire, we concluded that implementation of this type of work is necesarry. Our clients accepted it, as it leads to improvement of everyday life, induce self-respect and sense of ones own efficiacy. Family members became supportive network to each other in specific conditions. Instead of network of professionals, the network of people with similar hard expirience and their own ways of help in family crisis situations was formed.

Dissociative fugue is one or more episodes of amnesia. It is a rare condition in which a person suddenly, without planning or warning, travels from home or work and leave behind past life and identity.The aim is to present a patient with such disorder.

In this paper is present the case of Joka K, from M.Grad. She is married, mother of two child. She lives in joint household with a father in law who is authoritative person. Her brother-in-law lives in the ground floor. Her housband, is the youngest of eight children. Systemic family therapy was aplied and the plan of work was produced- 1. Moral and ethical norms in family 2.Loyalitiy to the family of origin 3.Incomplete grieving time following the death of mother and mother-in-law. 4.Expectations in terms of marriage 5.Different cultural views, traditions and family miths.6. Historicaly stipulated second line changes occuring one after another, with the absence of plato period.

The first sessions were attended by J., S. and J.s father, where the point of work was loss and loyality to the family origin. Differencies in cultural views between the families of origin examined in genogram session. Next sessions constitute an expansion of the genogramic session where the accent was placed on the family life cycle and historical sequence of second-line changes.

Implementation of the systemic family therapy, improved communication, established dialogs without breaking up the relation with the family of origin.

Family therapy has developed several approaches to framing questions within family meetings, but few of these techniques have been adapted for palliative care. We focus on the application of questioning techniques from systemic family therapy to palliative care. More specifically, we describe and give examples of the model of asking questions developed by Karl Tomm (1988) through its application in Family Focused Grief Therapy (FFGT), a preventive intervention delivered to high-risk families during palliative care and bereavement.

First, the type of questions used across the course of therapy is explored based on the interventive questioning model. Then, a case example is provided to demonstrate the use and adaptation of this model in a palliative care setting.

At the beginning of therapy, the most frequent questions were linear and circular, moving around the family to build up a picture of events from everyone's perspective. As for the frequency of reflexive and strategic questions, these increased as the therapy progressed, bringing the family to new perspectives. The case example fleshes out the importance of each type of question, all of which have a proper place in the course of therapy.

These illustrations highlight the value of having a model of questioning styles to guide the clinician when exploring palliative care issues, such as care provision, coping and grief, intimacy, and discussing death. This framework could be useful in guiding supervisors, trainees, and clinicians seeking to build skills and optimize their interventions in a palliative care setting.