We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Addressed to “the Great Variety of Readers,” the 1623 First Folio envisioned a reading subject whose importance time would realize. The unstated assumptions about readers lay in their unraced “variety,” and the significance of racial identity on the act of reading Shakespeare has been virtually taboo. With the advent of early modern critical race studies that challenged assumptions and methods in Shakespeare scholarship, the salience of Toni Morrison’s assertion in Playing in the Dark (1992) that readers are “positioned as white” needs investigation in relation to contemporary scholar-readers of Shakespeare. Whiteness studies, a subfield that Morrison’s text represents, intersects with early modern critical race studies in this book’s original examination of the reader as racial subject. Systemic whiteness, the historical and institutional formation of white racial identity and perception, has infused our cultural practices only to produce silence around the “white” reader. Racial literacy is proposed, therefore, as an acquired antiracist reading competence in response to the overdetermined critical practices of racial denial and erasure.
Race may dominate everyday speech, media headlines and public policy, yet still questions of racialized blackness and whiteness in Shakespeare are resisted. In his compelling new book Ian Smith addresses the influence of systemic whiteness on the interpretation of Shakespeare's plays. This far-reaching study shows that significant parts of Shakespeare's texts have been elided, misconstrued or otherwise rendered invisible by readers who have ignored the presence of race in early modern England. Bringing the Black American intellectual tradition into fruitful dialogue with European thought, this urgent interdisciplinary work offers a deep, revealing and incisive analysis of individual plays, including Othello, The Merchant of Venice and Hamlet. Demonstrating how racial illiteracy inhibits critical practice, Ian Smith provides a necessary anti-racist alternative that will transform the way you read Shakespeare.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.