Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 5 - Edith Wharton’s French Engagement

  • from Part II - International Wharton
  • Edited by Jennifer Haytock, Laura Rattray, University of Glasgow
  • Book:
    The New Edith Wharton Studies
    Published online:
    28 November 2019
    Print publication:
    19 December 2019, pp 80-95

  • Summary

    In this essay, Virginia Ricard argues that Wharton’s view of the place of the individual in society and more particularly the place and role of women was the result of her engagement in French intellectual life. She had read the accounts of French travelers in the United States from Tocqueville to Bourget and had registered their critique of American individualism. This connection did not go unnoticed by French literary critics for whom Wharton‘s novels – and in particular The House of Mirth – became prisms through which to observe American society and the role of women in that society. Yet, as her stance during the Dreyfus Affair shows, Wharton‘s perspective was not simply that of her French predecessors: she developed her own ideas of justice for the individual, of freedom and of progress, while continuing to believe that French society provided the best example of what she called “human communion” precisely because women were essential participants.