We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter provides an analysis of the implications of Turkish foreign policy on Syria and Iraq for Turkey–USA–NATO relations and argues that US support for the Syrian Kurds in the fight against the Islamic State (IS) caused a significant strain in USA–Turkey relations. It provides evidence for boundary-challenging behavior against the USA and NATO in light of Turkey’s long-lasting reluctance to join the fight against the IS, lax control of its border with Syria, and its denial of the Incirlik Air Base to US warplanes in the fight against the terrorist organization up until July 2015. It also makes a case for boundary-breaking behavior as a result of the use of compellent threats against US forces deployed in the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF)-held areas in Syria, the Turkish military and diplomatic cooperative balancing with Russia leading to Turkey’s involvement in the Astana peace talks, and the Russian air support to Turkey’s ground operations in Syria. It concludes that Turkish foreign policy in the region increasingly shows tendencies for boundary breaking against the West through the use of more traditional tools of balancing.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.