We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Personalized approach in drug therapy is an essential line of modern psychiatry. Experimental and clinical studies of anxiolytics have shown differences in drug effects in dependence on genetically determined reactions to stress and personal features.
Objectives
To evaluate of the therapeutic effects and effectiveness of bromodihydrochlorophenylbenzodiazepine and fabomotizole in dependence on individually-typological features of patients with anxiety disorders.
Methods
45 patients (mean age 33,3±9,7 years) with generalized anxiety disorder (n=22) and panic disorders with agoraphobia (n=23) participated in this open-label study. 13 patients treated with typical anxiolytics bromodihydrochlorophenylbenzodiazepine at dose 2 mg daily and 32 patients treated with atypical fabomotizole at dose 30 mg daily. The duration of treatment was 14 days. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Symptoms Severity Evaluation Questionnaire and CGI-E were administered.
Results
Asthenic features (high pessimism, anxiety, individualism) were revealed in 26 patients and stenic features (high impulsivity, rigidity and optimism) were revealed in 19 patients. Patients with asthenic features had tranquilo-activating effect of bromodihydrochlorophenylbenzodiazepine, whereas patients with stenic features had tranquilo-sedative effect. The tranquilo-activating effect of fabomotizole was revealed in patients with stenic features. High efficacy of bromodihydrochlorophenylbenzodiazepine was observed in patients with asthenic personality traits (χ 2 = 7,8), whereas in fabomotizole-in patients with stenic individual typological features (χ 2 = 9,1).
Conclusions
Patients with stenic and asthenic features had differences in therapeutic effects and the effectiveness of anxiolytics. Personality features determine the sensitivity of patients with anxiety disorders to psychotropic drugs.
Disclosure
No significant relationships.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.