We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The water demand associated with unconventional fossil fuel extraction and the management of the associated produced wastewater present significant environmental challenges. Water usage for unconventional fossil fuel extraction varies in different areas of the country, but overall is a small fraction of total water withdrawals for most locations. Produced water volumes and quality also vary nationwide, and disposal can have significant environmental impacts, especially if produced water is discharged to surface waters. This work discusses water use and requisition, changes in quantity and management of produced water nationwide from 2007 to 2017, and the environmental effects of management options. As unconventional natural gas production expands, selection of management options that do not lead to significant environmental impacts must be prioritized.
In late 2008 increasingly high concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) exceeding Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA/PL 93-523) standards of 500 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for public water supplies were found in the Monongahela River. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) began investigating TDS levels at points along approximately 70 stream miles on the Monongahela River from the West Virginia border to the confluence with the Youghiogheny River. In response, the West Virginia Water Research Institute (WVWRI) spearheaded a long-term water quality monitoring program in the Monongahela River Basin to identify sources and potential remediation options. The team found that modulation of the discharge volume from acid mine drainage treatment plants along the river could control TDS and sulfate levels below SDWA limits. Operators of the AMD treatment plants implemented the newly developed discharge management plan. The monitoring program expanded in 2012 to include the Allegheny and Upper Ohio River basins, adopting the name Three Rivers Quest (3RQ).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.