We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter begins with an exposition of Husserl’s phenomenology of embodiment, oriented around his fundamental distinction between the body as object and the body as lived. The lived body can only be apprehended as mine through the double-sided experience of touching and being-touched, and its movements are needed for the articulation of a three-dimensional spatiality in which we apprehend fully bounded things both far and near. Its kinaestheses or capacities for skilled movement also underpin the ‘I can’, the awareness of immediately available agency. I show what Merleau-Ponty takes up from Husserl and adapts for his own purposes, and go on to sketch out the influence of Jakob von Uexküll’s ethology and of Heidegger’s account of our being engaged in the world and being ahead of ourselves projectively. Against the backdrop of what Merleau-Ponty calls our intentional arc or fundamental function of projection, I give a preliminary overview of his positive account.
Touch constitutes a closer sensorial access to cheese, enabling to check its texture and consistency and inferring its creaminess, intensity, and maturity. However, touch is often forbidden in specialized shops. This chapter explores the paradoxes of touch as a both a normatively constrained practice and a crucial access to some essential sensorial qualities of the product. On the one hand, the seller has a privileged right to touch the cheese, within a form of “professional touch” – in the form of palpating movements of the hand – that can take the form of diagnostic checks orienting to the evolving state of the cheese or of demonstrative gestures addressed to the customer. On the other hand, the customer can obtain the right to touch the products in some circumstances, either requesting permission to touch or being offered to touch by the seller. Touching the cheese contributes to the selection of specific items, orienting to the unicity of each piece of cheese as far as its consistency, maturity, and organic evolution is concerned. So touching accesses specific relevant sensorial features that are crucial for evaluating cheese and making decisions about its selection and purchase.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.