The dsRNA-activated protein kinase PKR is involved in signal transduction pathways that mediate cellular processes as diverse as cell growth and differentiation, the stress response, and apoptosis. PKR was originally described as an interferon-inducible eIF2α kinase involved in the antiviral defense mechanism of the cell. The interaction of the kinase with specific viral RNAs has been studied in much detail, but information about cellular mRNAs, which are able to bind and activate PKR, is scarce. In search for such cellular mRNAs, we developed a cloning strategy to identify individual mRNA species from the dsRNA-rich fraction of Daudi cell poly(A)+ RNA. Two out of five cDNA clones we obtained contained sequences derived from the mRNA of the translationally controlled tumor protein P23/TCTP, indicating that this mRNA is present in the dsRNA-rich fraction. Secondary structure predictions and gel electrophoretic mobility investigations on P23/TCTP transcripts confirmed the potential of this mRNA to form extensive secondary structure. A full-length P23 transcript, but not a truncated version thereof, was able to bind to PKR in vitro and in vivo. Transient transfection experiments in human 293 cells showed that coexpression of full-length P23 mRNA leads to partial inhibition of the expression of a β-galactosidase reporter gene in trans. Additional coexpression of a dominant negative mutant of PKR or of adenovirus VA1 RNA suppressed this inhibition, indicating that it is mediated by PKR. Studies on P23/TCTP expression in cells from PKR-knockout mice suggest that P23/TCTP mRNA translation is regulated by PKR. Hence, our results demonstrate that the mRNA of P23/TCTP may both activate PKR and be subject to translational regulation by this kinase.

Members of the Puf family of RNA-binding proteins from Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Dictyostelium are known to function as translational repressors. To identify mammalian proteins that might regulate posttranscriptional gene expression, we have characterized a novel murine Puf protein, PUM2. Pum2 transcripts were expressed in all murine tissues examined, suggesting the gene influences processes common to many cell types. Like all Puf family members, PUM2 contains a C-terminal RNA-binding domain related to the Drosophila Pumilio homology domain (PUM-HD). Two features found in the amino-terminus of PUM2, regions rich in serine and glutamine/alanine-rich regions, were also identified in most Puf family members. RNA sequences capable of binding with high affinity (6.5 nM) to a 48-kDa recombinant protein containing the PUM2 PUM-HD were isolated by using an iterative amplification–selection protocol (SELEX). The consensus sequence [UGUANAUARNNNNBBBBSCCS] of the PUM2 binding element (PBE) is related to, but distinct from, the 3′ end of the Drosophila Nanos response element. The characterization of PUM2 and potential RNA-binding site will assist efforts to assess the extent and mechanism by which mammalian genes are regulated at a posttranscriptional level.

Clam p82 is a member of the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein (CPEB) family of RNA-binding proteins and serves dual functions in regulating gene expression in early development. In the oocyte, p82/CPEB is a translational repressor, whereas in the activated egg, it acts as a polyadenylation factor. Coimmunoprecipitations were performed with p82 antibodies in clam oocyte and egg lysates to identify stage-regulated accessory factors. p47 coprecipitates with p82 from oocyte lysates in an RNA-dependent manner and is absent from egg lysate p92-bound material. Clam p47 is a member of the RCK/p54 family of DEAD box RNA helicases. Xp54, the Xenopus homolog, with bona fide helicase activity, is an abundant and integral component of stored mRNP in oocytes (Ladomery et al., 1997). In oocytes, clam p47 and p82/CPEB are found in large cytoplasmic mRNP complexes. Whereas the helicase level is constant during embryogenesis, in contrast to CPEB, clam p47 translocates to nuclei at the two-cell stage. To address the role of this class of helicase in masking, Xp54 was tethered via 3′ UTR MS2-binding sites to firefly luciferase, following microinjection of fusion protein and nonadenylated reporter mRNAs into Xenopus oocytes. Tethered helicase repressed luciferase translation three- to fivefold and, strikingly, mutations in two helicase motifs (DEAD → DQAD and HRIGR → HRIGQ), activated translation three- to fourfold, relative to MS2. These data suggest that this helicase family represses translation of maternal mRNA in early development, and that its activity may be attenuated during meiotic maturation, prior to cytoplasmic polyadenylation.

Xenopus laevis Vg1 mRNA undergoes both localization and translational control during oogenesis. Vg1 protein does not appear until late stage IV, after localization is complete. To determine whether Vg1 translation is regulated by cytoplasmic polyadenylation, the RACE-PAT method was used. Vg1 mRNA has a constant poly(A) tail throughout oogenesis, precluding a role for cytoplasmic polyadenylation. To identify cis-acting elements involved in Vg1 translational control, the Vg1 3′ UTR was inserted downstream of the luciferase ORF and in vitro transcribed, adenylated mRNA injected into stage III or stage VI oocytes. The Vg1 3′ UTR repressed luciferase translation in both stages. Deletion analysis of the Vg1 3′ UTR revealed that a 250-nt UA-rich fragment, the Vg1 translational element or VTE, which lies 118 nt downstream of the Vg1 localization element, could repress translation as well as the full-length Vg1 3′ UTR. Poly(A)-dependent translation is not necessary for repression as nonadenylated mRNAs are also repressed, but cap-dependent translation is required as introduction of the classical swine fever virus IRES upstream of the luciferase coding region prevents repression by the VTE. Repression by the Vg1 3′ UTR has been reproduced in Xenopus oocyte in vitro translation extracts, which show a 10–25-fold synergy between the cap and poly(A) tail. A number of proteins UV crosslink to the VTE including FRGY2 and proteins of 36, 42, 45, and 60 kDa. The abundance of p42, p45, and p60 is strikingly higher in stages I–III than in later stages, consistent with a possible role for these proteins in Vg1 translational control.

Previous mouse models have indicated that Otx1 and Otx2 play an important role in brain and sense organ development and, together with the Drosophila orthodenticle (otd) gene, they share a high degree of reciprocal functional equivalence. Interestingly, mouse models replacing the same region of the Otx2 locus with Otx1, otd or lacZ genes have revealed the existence of a differential post-transcriptional control between the visceral endoderm (VE) and epiblast cells. Indeed Otx1, otd or lacZ mRNA were transcribed in both tissues but translated only in the VE. Embryos lacking OTX1 or OTD proteins in the epiblast and derived tissues, such as the neuroectoderm and axial mesendoderm (AME), fail to maintain the anterior identity and result in a headless phenotype. This finding leads us to hypothesise that, during evolution, the specification of the vertebrate-type brain may have required epiblast cells to translate Otx2 mRNA in order to establish maintenance properties. The establishment of this regulatory control might have been reflected into a remarkable reorganisation of the rostral CNS architecture and might have represented an important event in the evolution of the vertebrate head. Current data suggest that the Otx2 replaced region and in particular the 3′ untranslated region (UTR), may contain regulatory element(s) necessary to translate and/or stabilise Otx2 mRNA in epiblast and its derivatives.

The mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) catalytically promotes cotranslational translocation of signal sequence containing proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. While the S-domain of SRP binds the N-terminal signal sequence on the nascent polypeptide, the Alu domain of SRP temporarily interferes with the ribosomal elongation cycle until the translocation pore in the membrane is correctly engaged. Here we present biochemical and biophysical evidence for a hierarchical assembly pathway of the SRP Alu domain. The proteins SRP9 and SRP14 first heterodimerize and then initially bind to the Alu RNA 5′ domain. This creates the binding site for the Alu RNA 3′ domain. Alu RNA then undergoes a large conformational change with the flexibly linked 3′ domain folding back by 180° onto the 5′ domain complex to form the final compact Alu ribonucleoprotein particle (Alu RNP). We discuss the possible mechanistic consequences of the likely reversibility of this final step with reference to translational regulation by the SRP Alu domain and with reference to the structurally similar Alu RNP retroposition intermediates derived from Alu elements in genomic DNA.

In the transcriptionally inert maturing oocyte and early embryo, control of gene expression is largely mediated by regulated changes in translational activity of maternal mRNAs. Some mRNAs are activated in response to poly(A) tail lengthening; in other cases activation results from de-repression of the inactive or masked mRNA. The 3′ UTR cis-acting elements that direct these changes are defined, principally in Xenopus and mouse, and the study of their trans-acting binding factors is just beginning to shed light on the mechanism and regulation of cytoplasmic polyadenylation and translational masking. In the marine invertebrate, Spisula solidissima, the timing of activation of three abundant mRNAs (encoding cyclin A and B and the small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, RR) in fertilized oocytes correlates with their cytoplasmic polyadenylation. However, in vitro, mRNA-specific unmasking occurs in the absence of polyadenylation. In Walker et al. (in this issue) we showed that p82, a protein defined as selectively binding the 3′ UTR masking elements, is a homolog of Xenopus CPEB (cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein). In functional studies reported here, the elements that support polyadenylation in clam egg lysates include multiple U-rich CPE-like motifs as well as the nuclear polyadenylation signal AAUAAA. This represents the first detailed analysis of invertebrate cis-acting cytoplasmic polyadenylation signals. Polyadenylation activity correlates with p82 binding in wild-type and CPE-mutant RR 3′ UTR RNAs. Moreover, since anti-p82 antibodies specifically neutralize polyadenylation in egg lysates, we conclude that clam p82 is a functional homolog of Xenopus CPEB, and plays a positive role in polyadenylation. Anti-p82 antibodies also result in specific translational activation of masked mRNAs in oocyte lysates, lending support to our original model of clam p82 as a translational repressor. We propose therefore that clam p82/CPEB has dual functions in masking and cytoplasmic polyadenylation.

During early development gene expression is controlled principally at the translational level. Oocytes of the surf clam Spisula solidissima contain large stockpiles of maternal mRNAs that are translationally dormant or masked until meiotic maturation. Activation of the oocyte by fertilization leads to translational activation of the abundant cyclin and ribonucleotide reductase mRNAs at a time when they undergo cytoplasmic polyadenylation. In vitro unmasking assays have defined U-rich regions located approximately centrally in the 3′ UTRs of these mRNAs as translational masking elements. A clam oocyte protein of 82 kDa, p82, which selectively binds the masking elements, has been proposed to act as a translational repressor. Importantly, mRNA-specific unmasking in vitro occurs in the absence of poly(A) extension. Here we show that clam p82 is related to Xenopus CPEB, an RNA-binding protein that interacts with the U-rich cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements (CPEs) of maternal mRNAs and promotes their polyadenylation. Cloned clam p82/CPEB shows extensive homology to Xenopus CPEB and related polypeptides from mouse, goldfish, Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans, particularly in their RNA-binding C-terminal halves. Two short N-terminal islands of sequence, of unknown function, are common to vertebrate CPEBs and clam p82. p82 undergoes rapid phosphorylation either directly or indirectly by cdc2 kinase after fertilization in meiotically maturing clam oocytes, prior to its degradation during the first cell cleavage. Phosphorylation precedes and, according to inhibitor studies, may be required for translational activation of maternal mRNA. These data suggest that clam p82 may be a functional homolog of Xenopus CPEB.

A 22-codon upstream open reading frame (uORF2) in the human cytomegalovirus UL4 transcript leader inhibits downstream translation in cis. Previous studies revealed that the peptide product of uORF2 mediates this inhibitory effect by interfering with translation termination at its own stop codon. The block at termination results both in accumulation of the nascent uORF2 peptide linked to tRNAPro, the tRNA that decodes the final codon of uORF2, and in stalling of ribosomes at the end of uORF2. The stalled ribosomes create a barrier that obstructs ribosomal transit to the downstream cistron. In the current studies, we further investigated the mechanism of uORF2-mediated translational inhibition by assessing the kinetics of uORF2 peptidyl tRNAPro hydrolysis and ribosomal release from the uORF2 termination site. Whereas hydrolysis of a mutant, noninhibitory uORF2 peptidyl tRNA is nearly complete in less than 1 min, hydrolysis of the wild-type peptidyl tRNA is negligible even after 30 min. In spite of this remarkably prolonged block to hydrolysis of the uORF2 peptidyl tRNAPro, most ribosomes are released from the uORF2 termination site within 15 min. Thus, peptidyl tRNA hydrolysis is not absolutely required for ribosomal release in this system. These results suggest that a eukaryotic cellular mechanism exists for removing stalled ribosomes from mRNAs in the absence of peptidyl tRNA hydrolysis.