In another tumultuous term of the United States Supreme Court in 2022-2023 a series of critical cases implicate instant and forthcoming changes in multiple fronts that collectively shift the national public health law and policy environment.

In a dynamic term of the United States Supreme Court in 2021-2022 a series of critical cases raise manifold changes and impacts on individual and communal health through 10 key areas ranging from abortions to vaccinations.

The rise in vaccine hesitancy in high-income countries has led some to recommend that certain vaccinations be made compulsory in states where they are currently voluntary. In contrast, I contend that legal coercion is generally inappropriate to address the complex social and psychological phenomenon of vaccine anxieties.

Recent advances in gene editing technology promise much for medical advances and human well-being. However, in parallel domains, there have been objections to the use of such biotechnologies. Moreover, the psychological factors that govern the willingness to use gene editing technology have been underexplored to date. In this registered report, we sought to test whether pathogen disgust sensitivity is linked with opposition to gene editing. U.K.-based adult participants (N = 347) were recruited to this study. Gene editing attitudes reflected two largely distinct latent factors concerning enhancing human traits and treating medical disorders. In contrast to prediction, pathogen disgust sensitivity was related to greater support for gene editing in both of these domains. This result suggests that gene editing, at least in the current study, is not viewed as pathogenic, or that the perceived benefits of gene editing outweigh any perceived pathogen risk.

This article considers recent ethical topics in Australia relating to the health rights of children in the contexts of (1) detention centers, (2) vaccination, and (3) procreative liberty, within a wider framework of discussion of the competing rights of society, parents, the child, and future generations.

Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to understand the public's perception of the effectiveness of Rhode Island's public health emergency response plans by using municipal H1N1 vaccination clinics conducted in Rhode Island in January and February 2010 as a basis for public reaction. The effect of previous exercises on public perception was also examined.

Method: A survey of 926 H1N1 vaccination clinic attendees was conducted via mail during the period between March 18 and May 1, 2010.

Results: A total of 579 surveys were returned, rendering a response rate of 62.5%. The majority of clinic attendees traveled ≤10 mi to the vaccination clinic (90.48%). The average self-reported wait time inside the clinic was 19.16 minutes, and 69.84% of respondents expected to have waited longer before attending the clinic. The self-reported wait time was negatively correlated with patient-reported overall clinic satisfaction. A total of 98.08% of respondents believed that the signage used at the clinics was easy to follow, 100% of respondents believed that the clinic staff was courteous and respectful, and 82.35% of respondents reported that they would rate the clinic they attended as excellent.

Conclusions: Rhode Islanders prefer local public health service sites. There was a minor difference in the overall satisfaction of respondents who attended municipal clinics that had exercised emergency plans before activation for H1N1 vaccinations and those municipalities that had not previously exercised. The lack of difference between the practicing and nonpracticing points-of-dispensing may be caused by the standardization of municipal emergency plans, uniformity in the guidance and support of each clinic provided by the Rhode Island Department of Health, and municipalities that had not previously exercised had the opportunity to observe those that had exercised. Having thorough mass dispensing plans in place in advance of a public health emergency is as important as having exercised a point-of-dispensing before a real-world activation.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:106–111)

Extensive flooding occurred in Poland in 1997 and in Sweden in 2000. These events and their management are reviewed in this Report. The floods in Poland were more extensive than in Sweden as they covered some 10% of Poland's landmass. An estimated 55 persons died as a direct result of the floods in Poland and none were reported due to the flood in Sweden. No epidemics were encountered in either country, presumably related to the extensive use of bottled water and radio instructions to boil all water before its use. The water supply was interrupted and untreated water was taken into the water distribution systems. Chlorination of the water supplies was added in Sweden. Sewage and refuse management was problematic. The heathcare system was impacted profoundly in Poland both by direct damage to hospitals and/or loss of essential services such as electricity and water supplies. Government responses are described with the needs in Poland being extensive including the need for outside assistance. Some pathways used for obtaining aid were outside of government coordination. Comprehensive conclusions and recommendations derived from the observations are provided.