Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T22:54:12.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Bosi et al. (2023)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2023

Frank C. Hawthorne Open the ORCID record for Frank C. Hawthorne [Opens in a new window]
Frank C. Hawthorne*
Affiliation:
Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Frank C. Hawthorne; Email: Frank.Hawthorne@umanitoba.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 87 , Issue 3 , June 2023 , pp. 508 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Principal Editor: Roger Mitchell

References

Bosi, F. (2018) On the mineral nomenclatures: the dominant-valency rule. Abstract to XXII meeting of the IMA, Melbourne, Australia, 2018, 354.Google Scholar
Bosi, F., Hatert, F, Hålenius, U., Pasero, M., Miyawaki, R. and Mills, S.J. (2019a) On the application of the IMA−CNMNC dominant-valency rule to complex mineral compositions. Mineralogical Magazine, 83, 627–632.Google Scholar
Bosi, F., Biagioni, C. and Oberti, R. (2019b) On the chemical identification and classification of minerals. Minerals, 9, 591–603.Google Scholar
Bosi, F., Hatert, F., Pasero, M., Mills, S.J., Miyawaki, R. and Halenius, U. (2023) A brief comment on Hawthorne (2023): “On the definition of distinct mineral species: A critique of current IMA-CNMNC procedures”. Mineralogical Magazine, 87, doi:10.1180/mgm.2023.33Google Scholar
Gagné, O. and Hawthorne, F.C. (2016) Chemographic exploration of the milarite-type structure. The Canadian Mineralogist, 54, 1229–1247.Google Scholar
Hatert, F. and Burke, E.A.J. (2008) The IMA–CNMNC dominant-constituent rule revisited and extended. The Canadian Mineralogist, 46, 717–728.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (2002) The use of end-member charge-arrangements in defining new mineral species and heterovalent substitutions in complex minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 40, 699–710.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (2021) Proof that a dominant endmember formula can always be written for a mineral or a crystal structure. The Canadian Mineralogist, 59, 159–167.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (2023) On the definition of distinct mineral species: A critique of current IMA-CNMNC procedures. Mineralogical Magazine, 87, doi:10.1180/mgm.2023.8Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C., Sokolova, E., Agakhanov, A.A., Pautov, L.A., Karpenko, V.Yu. and Grew, E.S. (2018) Chemographic exploration of the hyalotekite structure-type. Mineralogical Magazine, 82, 929–937.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C., Mills, S.J., Hatert, F. and Rumsey, M.S. (2021) Ontology, archetypes and the definition of “mineral species”. Mineralogical Magazine, 85, 125–131; erratum, 85, 830.Google Scholar
Nickel, E.H. (1992) Solid solutions in mineral nomenclature. The Canadian Mineralogist, 30, 231–234.Google Scholar
Nickel, E.H. and Grice, J.D. (1998) The IMA commission on new minerals and mineral names: procedures and guidelines on mineral nomenclature. The Canadian Mineralogist, 36, 913–926.Google Scholar