Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:33:25.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Social Policy Responses and Institutional Reforms in the Pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2023

Gibrán Cruz-Martínez Open the ORCID record for Gibrán Cruz-Martínez [Opens in a new window] ,
Sony Pellissery Open the ORCID record for Sony Pellissery [Opens in a new window]  and
Ricardo Velázquez Leyer Open the ORCID record for Ricardo Velázquez Leyer [Opens in a new window]
Gibrán Cruz-Martínez*
Affiliation:
Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Sony Pellissery
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Policy, NLSIU, Bangalore, India
Ricardo Velázquez Leyer
Affiliation:
Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico
*
*Email: gicruz@ucm.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Themed Section on Social Policy Responses and Institutional Reforms in the Pandemic
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 22 , Issue 3: THEMED SECTION: Social Policy Responses and Institutional Reforms in the Pandemic , July 2023 , pp. 472 - 474
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023 Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, D. J. and Gwilym, H. (2022) ‘The food bank: a safety-net in place of welfare security in times of austerity and the Covid-19 crisis’, Social Policy and Society, DOI: 10.1017/S1474746421000907.10.1017/S1474746421000907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cena, R. and Dettano, A. (2022) ‘About waiting: a reading from social policies and emotions in the context of a pandemic’, Social Policy and Society, DOI: 10.1017/S1474746422000331.10.1017/S1474746422000331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz-Martínez, G., Velazquez Leyer, R. and Pellissery, S. (2023) ‘Have social policy responses to COVID-19 been institutionalised?’, Social Policy and Society, this themed section.Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
León, M., Arlotti, M., Palomera, D. and Ranci, C. (2021) ‘Trapped in a blind spot: the Covid-19 crisis in nursing homes in Italy and Spain’, Social Policy and Society, DOI: 10.1017/S147474642100066X.10.1017/S147474642100066XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, C., Watson, N., Brunner, R., Cullingworth, J., Hameed, S., Scherer, N. and Shakespeare, T. (2022) ‘Covid-19 and the crisis in social care: exploring the experiences of disabled people in the pandemic’, Social Policy and Society, DOI: 10.1017/S1474746422000112.10.1017/S1474746422000112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramia, G. and Perrone, L. (2021) ‘Crisis management, policy reform, and institutions: the social policy response to COVID-19 in Australia’, Social Policy and Society, DOI: 10.1017/S1474746421000427.10.1017/S1474746421000427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seelkopf, L. and Starke, P. (2019) ‘Social policy by other means: theorising unconventional forms of welfare production’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 2, 3, 219–34.Google Scholar