Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T11:07:27.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The welfare state and the roles of social capital in subjective well-being: The crowding-out and crowding-in arguments revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2023

Naoki Akaeda Open the ORCID record for Naoki Akaeda [Opens in a new window]
Naoki Akaeda*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Sociology, Kansai University, 3-3-35 Yamate-cho, Suita-shi, Osaka 564-8680 Japan
*
Email: akaeda@kansai-u.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In international comparative research, significant advances have been made in the study of the effect of social capital and the welfare state on subjective well-being (SWB). However, few studies have examined how the welfare state influences the impact of social capital on SWB. To fill this gap, from the perspectives of the crowding-out and crowding-in hypotheses, this study explores whether welfare provisions alter the role of three dimensions of social capital – namely, social trust, formal social contact, and informal social contact, in SWB. The present study utilises international comparative data from nine waves of the European Social Survey of 2002 to 2019 and a two-way fixed-effects model to evaluate the cross-level interaction effects of welfare provisions and the three dimensions of social capital on SWB. This analysis reveals that welfare spending strengthens the positive association between social capital and SWB.

Keywords

welfare provisionssocial capitalsubjective well-beingcomparative longitudinal survey datatwo-way fixed-effects model
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , First View , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Naoki Akaeda is an Associate Professor of the Faculty of Sociology of Kansai University. He received his PhD in human sciences at Osaka University in 2011. He conducts research on how social capital, including social trust, civic participation, family, relatives and friends, and well-being vary depending on the characteristics of countries and residential areas. He studies social capital, welfare state policies, subjective well-being, international comparative research, urban sociology, and quantitative methods.

References

Akaeda, N. (2021), ‘Welfare states and the health impact of social capital: Focusing on the crowding-out and crowding-in perspectives’, Social Indicators Research, 157, 3, 841–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Galvez, J. and Jaime-Castillo, A. M. (2018), ‘The impact of social expenditure on health inequalities in Europe’, Social Science & Medicine, 200, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdieu, P. (1986), ‘The forms of capital’, in Richardson, J. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press, 280–291.Google Scholar
Brewer, K. B., Oh, H. and Sharma, S. (2014), ‘“Crowding in” or “crowding out”? An examination of the impact of the welfare state on generalized social trust’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 1, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. (1982), ‘Income testing and social cohesion’, in Garfinkel, I. (ed.), Income-Tested Transfer Programs: The Case for and Against, New York: Academic Press, 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988), ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delhey, J., Newton, K. and Welzel, C. (2011), ‘How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius of trust problem’, American Sociological Review, 76, 5, 786–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., and Oishi, S. (2002), ‘Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction’, in Snyder, C. R. and Lopez, S. J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 463–473.Google Scholar
Diener, E. and Seligman, M. E. (2004), ‘Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draude, A., Hölck, L. and Stolle, D. (2018), ‘Social trust’, in Risse, T., Börzel, T. A. and Draude, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance and Limited Statehood, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 352–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. ([1893] 1964), The Division of Labor in Society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2021), ‘Eurostat: Your key to European statistics’, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ [accessed 14.02.2021].Google Scholar
European Social Survey (2018), ESS 1-9, European Social Survey Cumulative File, Study Description, Bergen: NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
European Social Survey Cumulative File (2020), ESS 1-9, Data File Edition 1.0. NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway: Data Archive and Distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
Ferragina, E. (2017), ‘The welfare state and social capital in Europe: Reassessing a complex relationship’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 58, 1, 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, M. (2022), ‘Moving social policy from mental illness to public wellbeing’, Journal of Social Policy, 51, 3, 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavin, P., Pacek, A. C. and Radcliff, B. (2014), ‘Assessing the impact of the size and scope of government on human well-being’, Social Forces, 92, 4, 1241–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesthuizen, M., van der Meer, T. and Scheepers, P. (2008), ‘Education and dimensions of social capital: Do educational effects differ due to educational expansion and social security expenditure?’, European Sociological Review, 24, 5, 617–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesselmann, M. and Schmidt-Catran, A. W. (2018), ‘Getting the within estimator of cross-level interactions in multilevel models with pooled cross-sections: Why country dummies (sometimes) do not do the job’, Sociological Methodology, 49, 1, 190–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glatz, C. and Eder, A. (2020), ‘Patterns of trust and subjective well-being across europe: New insights from repeated cross-sectional analyses based on the european social survey 2002–2016’, Social Indicators Research, 148, 2, 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, J. and Wang, S. (2011), ‘Trust and wellbeing’, International Journal of WellBeing, 1, 1, 42–78.Google Scholar
Helliwell, J. F. and Putnam, R. D. (2004), ‘The social context of well-being’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1449, 1435–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H. and Wang, S. (2018), ‘New evidence on trust and well-being’, in Uslaner, E. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, New York: Oxford University Press, 409–446.Google Scholar
Janowitz, M. (1976), Social Control of the Welfare State, New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kääriäinen, J. and Lehtonen, H. (2006), ‘The variety of social capital in welfare state regimes: A comparative study of 21 countries’, European Societies, 8, 1, 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kislev, E. (2020), ‘Social capital, happiness, and the unmarried: A multilevel analysis of 32 European countries’, Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15, 5, 1475–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, C. (2008), Social Capital and the Happiness of Nations: The Importance of Trust and Networks for Life Satisfaction in a Cross-National Perspective, Frankfurt: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Cook, K. and Burt, R. S. (2001), Social Capital: Theory and Research, New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moehring, K. (2012), The fixed effect approach as an alternative to multilevel analysis for cross-national analyses, Gk Soclife Working Papers Series: Center for Open Science.Google Scholar
Neira, I., Lacalle-Calderon, M., Portela, M. and Perez-Trujillo, M. (2018), ‘Social capital dimensions and subjective well-being: A quantile approach’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 8, 2551–2579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, H. and Lee, K. S. (2013), ‘Welfare states and the redistribution of happiness’, Social Forces, 92, 2, 789–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, F. and Wallace, C. (2007), ‘Patterns of formal and informal social capital in Europe’, European Sociological Review, 23, 4, 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, A. (1998), ‘Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powdthavee, N. (2008), ‘Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships’, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 4, 1459–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Radcliff, B. (2013), The Political Economy of Human Happiness: How Voter’s Choices Determine the Quality of Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeskens, T. and van Oorschot, W. (2014), ‘European feelings of deprivation amidst the financial crisis’, Acta Sociologica, 57, 3, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeskens, T. and Vandecasteele, L. (2017), ‘Economic hardship and well-being: Examining the relative role of individual resources and welfare state effort in resilience against economic hardship’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 1, 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Pose, A. and von Berlepsch, V. (2014), ‘Social capital and individual happiness in Europe’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 2, 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostila, M. (2013), Social Capital and Health Inequality in European Welfare States, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, B. O. (2001), ‘Social capital in the social democratic welfare state’, Politics & Society, 29, 2, 207–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheepers, P., Grotenhuis, M. T. and Gelissen, J. (2002), ‘Welfare states and dimensions of social capital: Cross-national comparisons of social contacts In European countries’, European Societies, 4, 2, 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, F. (2019), ‘The Standardized World Income Inequality Database, Version 8. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LM4OWF, Harvard Dataverse, V4: Center for Open Science’ https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/LM4OWF/ [accessed 15.09.2020].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutzer, A. and Frey, B. S. (2006), ‘Political participation and procedural utility: An empirical study’, European Journal of Political Research, 45, 3, 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tönnies, F. ([1887] 1957), Community and Society, Michigan: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
van der Meer, T., Scheepers, P. and te Grotenhuis, M. (2009), ‘States as molders of informal relations?’, European Societies, 11, 2, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ingen, E. and van der Meer, T. (2011), ‘Welfare state expenditure and inequalities in voluntary association participation’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 4, 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Oorschot, W. and Arts, W. (2005), ‘The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15, 1, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalonga-Olives, E. and Kawachi, I. (2017), ‘The dark side of social capital: A systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital’, Social Science & Medicine, 194, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visser, M., Gesthuizen, M. and Scheepers, P. (2018), ‘The crowding in hypothesis revisited: New insights into the impact of social protection expenditure on informal social capital’, European Societies, 20, 2, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, A. (1989), Whose Keeper?: Social Science and Moral Obligation, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, W. H. (2015), ‘Placing families in context: Challenges for cross-national family research’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 77, 1, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Akaeda supplementary material

Appendix

Download Akaeda supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.5 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Akaeda supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Akaeda supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.8 MB