Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-bvshn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-29T06:49:06.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Removing the glass ceilings: diverse mechanisms for social cohesion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2025

Dennis Papadopoulos Open the ORCID record for Dennis Papadopoulos [Opens in a new window] ,
Kristin Andrews Open the ORCID record for Kristin Andrews [Opens in a new window]  and
Jenny Michlich Open the ORCID record for Jenny Michlich [Opens in a new window]
Dennis Papadopoulos*
Affiliation:
Seneca Polytechnic, Toronto, ON, Canada d.v.papadopoulos@gmail.com Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada
Kristin Andrews
Affiliation:
York Research Chair in Animal Minds, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada andrewsk@yorku.ca
Jenny Michlich
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA jennymichlich@g.harvard.edu
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dunbar suggests that social stressors set “glass ceilings” on the evolution of mammalian group size and cohesion. We argue that this glass ceiling narrative conceals three contentious anthropocentric assumptions. First, large stable groups would always be beneficial. Second, grooming is an indicator for maintaining group cohesion. Third, group size is primarily limited by cognitive or behavioral incapacity. We challenge all three assumptions.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e179
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Carter, G. G., Farine, D. R., Crisp, R. J., Vrtilek, J. K., Ripperger, S. P., & Page, R. A. (2020). development of new food-sharing relationships in vampire bats. Current Biology, 30(7), 1275–1279.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.055 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. (2025). Structural and cognitive mechanisms of group cohesion in primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.Google Scholar
Henson, L. H., Balkenhol, N., Gustas, R., Adams, M., Walkus, J., Housty, W. G., Stronen, A. V., Moody, J., Service, C., Reece, D., vonHoldt, B. M., McKechnie, I., Koop, B. F., & Darimont, C. T. (2021). Convergent geographic patterns between grizzly bear population genetic structure and Indigenous language groups in coastal British Columbia, Canada. Ecology and Society, 26(3), art7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12443-260307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inksetter, L. (2018). Back to where it all began: Revisiting algonquin resource use and territoriality. Anthropologica, 60(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.60.1.t12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, N. G. (2021). Social and affective touch in primates and its role in the evolution of social cohesion. Neuroscience, 464, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.11.024 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayapali, U., Perera, P., Cresswell, J., & Dayawansa, N. (2023). Does anthropogenic influence on habitats alter the activity budget and home range size of toque macaques (Macaca sinica)? Insight into the human-macaque conflict. Trees, Forests and People, 13, 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsó, S., & Wrage, B. (2020). Tactful animals: How the study of touch can inform the animal morality debate. Philosophical Psychology, 34(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1859100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandri, C., Regaiolli, B., Vespiniani, A., & Spiezio, C. (2017). New food provision strategy for a colony of Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus): Effects on social hierarchy?. Integrative Food, Nutrition and Metabolism, 4(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15761/IFNM.1000181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, E., & Andrews, K. (2022). A pluralistic framework for the psychology of norms. Biology & Philosophy, 37(5), 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-022-09871-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature, 308(5955), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1038/308181a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, B., Brask, J. B., Dabelsteen, T., & Briefer, E. F. (2024). Exploring the role of vocalizations in regulating group dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 379(1905), 20230183. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0183 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamagiwa, J., & Hill, D. A. (1998). Intraspecific variation in the social organization of Japanese macaques: Past and present scope of field studies in natural habitats. Primates, 39(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar