9 - Aggregation on bipolar scales

Summary

Introduction

So far, we have mainly considered aggregation functions whose variables lie in [0, 1] or some similar structure, i.e., a closed interval of some linearly ordered set. The lower and upper bounds of this interval represent the lowest and highest scores (or utility values, outcomes, etc.) along each dimension.

We may desire to consider a third particular point of the interval, say e, which will play a particular role, for example a neutral value (in some sense) or an annihilator value. We have already encountered this situation when dealing with uninorms (cf. Section 3.6): e ∈]0, 1 [is a neutral element in the sense that ⋃(e, x) = x for any x ∈ [0, 1]. For convenience, up to a rescaling, we may always consider that we work on [−1, 1], and 0 corresponds to our particular point, denoted e before. In the more general case of bounded linearly ordered sets, we apply a symmetrization procedure; see Section 9.3.

The motivation for such a study is not only mathematical. There is psychological evidence that in many cases, scores or utilities manipulated by humans lie on a bipolar scale, that is to say, a scale with a neutral value making the frontier between good or satisfactory scores, and bad or unsatisfactory scores. With our convention, good scores are positive ones, while negative scores reflect bad scores. Most of the time, our behavior with positive scores is not the same as with negative ones: for example, a conjunctive attitude may be turned into a disjunctive attitude when changing the sign of the scores.