Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:59:16.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Doctors Without Borders? The Law Applicable to Cross-Border eHealth Services and AI-Based Medicine

from Part IV - Balancing Regulation, Innovation and Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2022

By
Jan D. Lüttringhaus
Edited by
Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci ,
Michael Lowery Wilson ,
Mark Fenwick ,
Nikolaus Forgó  and
Till Bärnighausen
Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Michael Lowery Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Finland
Mark Fenwick
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Japan
Nikolaus Forgó
Affiliation:
Universität Wien, Austria
Till Bärnighausen
Affiliation:
Universität Heidelberg
Get access

Summary

By their very nature eHealth applications – including telemedicine, AI-based medicine and ‘smart’ medical devices – are ubiquitous: These tools may be used by the physician next door as well as in the most remote locations abroad. Moreover, highly sensitive medical data may flow around the world within a split second. Against this backdrop, eHealth and telemedicine services can be provided from – and the necessary data can be transferred to – virtually every corner of the world. By contrast, the scope of application of regulation relating to AI-driven medicine, as well as eHealth and telemedicine, is usually confined to the legislating state. Moreover, the number and complexity of rules and regulations in this field vary considerably from state to state. Does this mean that international MedTech businesses may simply set up camp in the jurisdiction most favourable to their business models? For practitioners in telemedicine, the MedTech industry providing AI applications or digital medical devices such as eHealth apps, as well as for patients, it is essential to know which laws govern activities undertaken in cross-border scenarios. This concerns licensing requirements and the level of data protection as well as contract and tort law applicable to eHealth, telemedicine and telesurgery services.

Keywords

eHealthtelemedicineAIconflict of lawsjurisdictiondata protectionpublic policycontracttortproduct liability
Type
Chapter
Information
AI in eHealth
Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare
 , pp. 311 - 333
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, C, ‘Google’s Effort to Prevent Blindness Shows AI Challenges’ Wall Street Journal, 26 January 2019, www.wsj.com/articles/googles-effort-to-prevent-blindness-hits-roadblock-11548504004, accessed 19 June 2020.Google Scholar
Ameringer, C, ‘State-Based Licensure of Telemedicine: The Need for Uniformity but Not a National Scheme’ (2011) 14(1) Journal of Health Care Law and Policy 55–85.Google Scholar
Bach, I, ‘Medical Apps – wer haftet bei Fehlern?’ (2017) 50(6) Gynäkologe 473–78.Google Scholar
Barnes, JK, ‘Telemedicine A Conflict of Laws Problem Waiting to Happen – How Will Interstate and International Claims be Decided?’ (2006) 28(2) Houston Journal of International Law 491–529.Google Scholar
Bashshur, R and Shannon, G, History of Telemedicine: Evolution, Context, and Transformation (Liebert 2009).Google Scholar
Bourassa Forcier, M and others ‘Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Health Care Through Data Access: Can the GDPR Act as a Beacon for Policymakers?’ (2019) 6(1) Journal of Law and the Biosciences 317–35.Google Scholar
Brkan, M, ‘Data Protection and Conflict-of-Laws: A Challenging Relationship’ (2016) 2(3) European Data Protection Law Review 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, North and Fawcett, Private International Law 15th ed (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Cloud, M, ‘Robots Are Coming: A Discussion of Choice-of-Law Issues and Outcomes in Telesurgical Malpractice’ (2019) 6(3) Texas A&M Law Review 707–30.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services, ‘Telemedicine Licensure Report’ Office for the Advancement of Telehealth, Centre for Telemedicine, 2003.Google Scholar
Dicey, Morris and Collins, The Conflict of Laws I, 15th ed (Thomson Reuters 2012).Google Scholar
Dicey, Morris and Collins, The Conflict of Laws II, 15th ed (Thomson Reuters 2012).Google Scholar
Dickinson, A, The Rome II Regulation (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Staff Working Document on the Applicability of the Existing EU Legal Framework to Telemedicine Services’ SWD(2012) 414 final, 6 December 2012, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0414:FIN:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
European Commission, ‘Staff Working Document on Liability for Emerging Digital Technologies’, SWD(2018) 137 final, 25 April 2018, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018SC0137Google Scholar
Fenton, J, Taplin, S, Carney, P and others, ‘Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography’ (2007) 356(14) New England Journal of Medicine 1399–1409.Google Scholar
Ferrera, D and Woodward, M ‘Liability Issues Continue to Evolve in Computer-Assisted Surgery’ MDDI Online, 2020, www.mddionline.com/legal/liability-issues-continue-evolve-computer-assisted-surgery, accessed 9 June 2020.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration, ‘Computer-Assisted Surgical Systems’ 13 March 2019, www.fda.gov/medical-devices/surgery-devices/computer-assisted-surgical-systems, accessed 9 June 2020.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration, ‘Examples of Device Software Functions the FDA Regulates’ 26 September 2019, www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-software-functions-including-mobile-medical-applications/examples-device-software-functions-fda-regulates, accessed 9 June 2020.Google Scholar
Hay, P, Borchers, P, Symeonides, S and others, Conflict of Laws (West Academic 2018).Google Scholar
Health Resources & Services Administration, ‘Office for the Advancement of Telehealth’, www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/telehealth/, accessed 24 May 2021.Google Scholar
Heinze, C and Warmuth, C, ‘Das Sonderprozessrecht der Datenschutz-Grundverordnung’ (2016) 21 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess International 175–98.Google Scholar
Jakobs, I and Huber, F ‘Software als Medizinprodukt: Haftungs-und versicherungsrechtliche Aspekte’ (2019) 1 Zeitschrift Medizin Produkte Recht 1–6.Google Scholar
Kadner, Graziano Th ‘Torts’ in Basedow, J and others (eds), Encyclopedia of Private International Law II (Edward Elgar 2017) 1709–17.Google Scholar
Keysers, D, ‘Implantate – (Produkt-)Haftungsrechtliche Fragestellungen unter Berücksichtigung der Medical Device Regulation (Teil 2)’ (2020) 2 Haftpflicht International 54–61.Google Scholar
Kohler, C, ‘Conflict of Law Issues in the 2016 Data Protection Regulation of the European Union’ (2019) 3 Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale 653–75.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, K-F, Kriegmair, MC and Michel, M-C, ‘Kollaborative Automatisierung und Robotik’ (2019) 37(12) Reinprecht 925–27.Google Scholar
Lehman, C and others ‘Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection’ (2015) 175(11) JAMA Internal Medicine 1828.Google Scholar
Lüttringhaus, J, ‘Art. 1 Rome I Regulation’ in Ferrari, F (ed), Concise Commentary on the Rome I Regulation, 2nd ed (Cambridge University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Lüttringhaus, J, ‘Das internationale Datenprivatrecht: Baustein des Wirtschaftskollisionsrechts des 21. Jahrhunderts – Das IPR der Haftung für Verstöße gegen die EU-Datenschutzgrundverordnung’ (2018) 117(1) Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 50–82.Google Scholar
Marescaux, J, ‘Nom de code: ‘Opération Lindbergh‘ (2002) 127(1) Annals of Surgery 2–4.Google Scholar
Metz, C ‘India Fights Diabetic Blindness With Help From A.I.’ New York Times, 10 March 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/03/10/technology/artificial-intelligence-eye-hospital-india.html, accessed 17 June 2020.Google Scholar
Middendorf, M and Wever, C, ‘Telemedicine to the Rescue? Reviewing the Current Liability Picture in Germany’ (2020) 4(2) Haftpflicht International 1–4.Google Scholar
De Miguel Asensio, P, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the New EU General Data Protection Regulation’ (2017) 69(1) Revista Española de Derecho Internacional 75–108.Google Scholar
Ortner, R and Daubenbüchel, F‚ ‘Medizinprodukte 4.0 – Haftung, Datenschutz, IT-Sicherheit’ (2016) 41 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2918–24.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, M, ‘Europarechtliche Aspekte der Medizinprodukthaftung’ (2019) 3 Haftpflicht International 116.Google Scholar
Pormeister, K, ‘Genetic Research and Applicable Law: The Intra-EU Conflict of Laws as a Regulatory Challenge to Cross-Border Genetic Research’ (2018) 3 Journal of Law and the Biosciences 706–23.Google Scholar
Spickhoff, A, ‘Rechtsfragen der grenzüberschreitenden Telemedizin’ (2008) 36(8) Medizinrecht 535–43.Google Scholar
Wendelstein, C, Kollisionsrechtliche Probleme der Telemedizin (Mohr Siebeck 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilderspin, M, ‘Consumer Contracts’ in Basedow, J, Rühl, G, Ferrari, F and others (eds), Encyclopedia of Private International Law I(Edward Elgar 2017) 464–72.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×