Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:29:15.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Regulating the ‘Benefits’ of eHealth

Information Disclosure Duties in the Age of AI

from Part IV - Balancing Regulation, Innovation and Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2022

Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Michael Lowery Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Finland
Mark Fenwick
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Japan
Nikolaus Forgó
Affiliation:
Universität Wien, Austria
Till Bärnighausen
Affiliation:
Universität Heidelberg
Get access

Summary

Much legal and ethical attention in the area of eHealth focuses on the risks of health data processing ‘going wrong’ – a breach of privacy occurs, data is misused in an unauthorised way, or the analysis of data gives a faulty result. However, significant challenges are also posed by such processing where the data processing ‘goes to plan’ – the analysis gives the correct result in the way intended. Such challenges stem both from the nature of the information generated, and the new contexts in which this occurs. Thus, Big Data analysis may produce ever more information in relation to a person’s future health, usually of a probabilistic nature. In what situations should such information be returned to the subject (bearing in mind also that the decision-maker increasingly will be an entity outside the traditional health care context)? This chapter considers key ethical considerations that arise in such cases, and how well the law – through liability rules for harm, caused by failure to disclose, or by unjustified disclosure – is equipped to respond.

Type
Chapter
Information
AI in eHealth
Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare
, pp. 378 - 400
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, U-V (ed), Chances and Risks of Mobile Health Apps (Charisma) (Hannover Medical School 2016).Google Scholar
Andorno, R, ‘The Right Not to Know – An Autonomy-Based Approach’ (2004) 30(5) Journal of Medical Ethics 435–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, T and Childress, J, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press 2001).Google Scholar
Cate, FH and others, Data Protection Principles for the 21st Century (Maurer Faculty Report 2013).Google Scholar
Chen, JH ‘Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine – Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations’ (2017) 376(26) New England Journal of Medicine 2507–25.Google Scholar
Cole, C and others, ‘“Ethical Responsibility” or “A Whole Can of Worms”: Differences in Opinion on Incidental Finding Review and Disclosure in Neuroimaging Research from Focus Group Discussions with Participants, Parents, IRB Members, Investigators, Physicians and Community Members’ (2015) 41(10) Journal of Medical Ethics 841–47.Google Scholar
Dahi, A and others, ‘Using Patient Avatars to Promote Health Data Sharing Applications: Perspectives and Regulatory Challenges’ (2016) 23(2) European Journal of Health Law 175–94.Google Scholar
Duncan, RE, ‘Predictive Genetic Testing in Young People: When Is It Appropriate?’ (2004) 40(11) Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 593–95.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 1988).Google Scholar
Epstein, RM and others, ‘Withholding Information from Patients – When Less Is More’ (2010) 362(5) The New England Journal of Medicine 380–81.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Green Paper on Mobile Health (“mHealth”)’ COM(2014) 219 final, 2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/LSU/?uri=celex:52014DC0219Google Scholar
Fry, H, Hello World (Norton 2018).Google Scholar
Gammon, BL and others, ‘Decisional Regret in Women Receiving High Risk or Inconclusive Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Results’ (2020) 33(8) Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 1412–18.Google Scholar
Gilbar, R, ‘Communicating Genetic Information in the Family: The Familial Relationship as the Forgotten Factor’ (2007) 33(7) Journal of Medical Ethics 390–93.Google Scholar
Godard, B and others, ‘Guidelines for Disclosing Genetic Information to Family Members: From Development to Use’ (2006) 5(2) Familial Cancer 103–16.Google Scholar
Laurie, G, ‘In Defence of Ignorance: Genetic Information and the Right not to Know’ (1999) 6(2) European Journal of Health Law 119–32.Google Scholar
Laurie, G, ‘Recognizing the Right Not to Know: Conceptual, Professional, and Legal Implications’ (2014) 42(1) The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 53–63.Google Scholar
Mackie, JL, The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation (Clarendon Press 1980).Google Scholar
Mayer-Schönberger, V and Cukier, K, Big Data (John Murray 2013).Google Scholar
Mill, JS, A System of Logic (John W Parker 1843).Google Scholar
Provost, F and Fawcett, T, Data Science for Business (O’Reilly Media 2013).Google Scholar
Stauch, M, ‘Causation, Risk, and Loss of Chance in Medical Negligence’ (1997) 17(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 205–26.Google Scholar
Teff, H, Causing Psychiatric and Emotional Harm (Hart 2009).Google Scholar
Thorogood, A and others, ‘An Implementation Framework for the Feedback of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings in Research’ (2014) 15(1) BMC Medical Ethics 1–13.Google Scholar
Wright, RW, ‘Causation in Tort Law’ (1985) 73(6) California Law Review 1735–1828.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×