Book contents
- American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828
- Nineteenth-Century American Literature In Transition
- American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Series Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Part I Form and Genre
- Part II Networks
- Part III Methods for Living
- Chapter 14 The Affective Postwar
- Chapter 15 Revolutionary Lives
- Chapter 16 Literature of Poverty and Labor
- Chapter 17 Neuroqueering the Republic
- Chapter 18 A Queer Crip Method for Early American Studies
- Index
Chapter 17 - Neuroqueering the Republic
The Case of Charles Brockden Brown’s Ormond
from Part III - Methods for Living
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 June 2022
- American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828
- Nineteenth-Century American Literature In Transition
- American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Series Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Part I Form and Genre
- Part II Networks
- Part III Methods for Living
- Chapter 14 The Affective Postwar
- Chapter 15 Revolutionary Lives
- Chapter 16 Literature of Poverty and Labor
- Chapter 17 Neuroqueering the Republic
- Chapter 18 A Queer Crip Method for Early American Studies
- Index
Summary
This essay considers Charles Brockden Brown’s Ormond as an imaginative experiment with neurodiversity, considering, in particular, what it means to know, as we do now, that different brains are fundamentally, neurologically different and how neurological difference might have been narrated before there was a language for it. This is an investigation not of intelligence or mental health but of fundamental neurological difference and what it might have meant for the late eighteenth century United States, then a new nation politically organized through republicanism in which representative (white, propertied) men were expected to represent the needs of “the people” and trusted with governance. Ormond troubles the foundational formulation that American bodyminds simply required the right education and training to become, in Benjamin Rush’s words, “republican machines” able “to perform their parts properly, in the great machine of the government of the state.” If republicanism was structured by a presumption of neurotypicality, Ormond presents a fascinating example of a novel working to represent different bodyminds during a time when there were not yet adequate narrative means for doing so.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- American Literature in Transition, 1770–1828 , pp. 309 - 326Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022