Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:47:59.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Early classical private law

from PART IV - ROMAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE UNDER THE JULIO-CLAUDIANS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Bruce W. Frier
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Alan K. Bowman
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Edward Champlin
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Andrew Lintott
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

With the establishment of the Augustan Principate, Roman private law enters its ‘classical’ period. During the largely tranquil centuries that followed, Rome's jurists articulated and developed a body of law that is beyond doubt the most conspicuous and influential Roman contribution to Western civilization. This chapter does not describe the system of Roman law itself, but instead concentrates on the jurists and the Roman judicial system during the Julio-Claudian and Flavian eras.

THE JURISTS AND THE PRINCIPATE

Classical Roman law is based upon a distinctive procedural system, called formulary procedure. Formulary procedure, like most other well-developed procedural systems, distinguishes between justiciability (iurisdictio), the judicial determination that a plaintiff is stating a legally acceptable cause of action, and adjudication (iudicatio), the hearing and resolution of the plaintiff's claim. However, formulary procedure radicalizes this distinction: the trial is divided into two stages decided by separate persons.

At Rome, almost all suits between citizens were raised initially in the court of the urban praetor, an annually elected magistrate. The Praetor's Edict listed those causes of action that he was willing to accept during his term of office, as well as the general procedure to be followed in his court; already by the late Republic, the contents of the Edict varied little from year to year. If, in a given case, the plaintiff stated an acceptable cause of action, the praetor assigned a judge (iudex), or in some cases multiple judges, to hear the case; the iudex was usually a layman acceptable as an arbiter to both sides.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acta diui Augusti I (only this volume published), edited by Riccobono, S. et al. Rome, 1945.
Amarelli, F. Consilia Principum. Naples, 1983.
Astolfi, R. I'Libri Tres Iuris Civilis’ di Sabino. Padua, 1983.
Atkinson, K. M. T.The education of the lawyer in ancient Rome’, The South African Law Journal 87 (1970).Google Scholar
Bauman, R. A. Lawyers in Roman Transitional Politics. Munich, 1985.
Bove, L. Documenti processuali dalle tabulae Pompeianae di Murecine. Naples, 1979.
Bove, L. Documenti di operazioni finanziarie dall'archivio dei Sulpici. Naples, 1984.
Bowman, A. K.Papyri and Roman imperial history, 1960–1975’, Journal of Roman Studies 66 (1976).Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. A Textbook of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. 3 rd edn revised by Stein, P.. Cambridge, 1966.
Bui, I.La “Cognitio extra Ordinem”: Da Augusto a Diocleziano’, Temporini, H., Haase, W. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der neueren Forschung. Berlin and New York, 1972II, 14 (1982).Google Scholar
Champlin, E.Pegasus’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 32 (1978).Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. Consilium Principis: Imperial Councils and Counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian. Cambridge, 1955.
Falchi, G. L. Le controversie tra Sabiniani e Proculiani. Milan, 1981.
Frier, B. W. The Rise of the Roman Jurists: Studies in Cicero's pro Caecina. Princeton, 1985.
González, J.The Lex Irnitana: a new copy of the Flavian municipal law’, Journal of Roman Studies 76 (1986).Google Scholar
Gualandi, G. Legislazione imperiale e giurisprudenza. 2 vols. Milan, 1963.
Honoré, A. M.Proculus’, Revue de l'histoire du droit (= Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis) 30 (1962).Google Scholar
Horak, F. Rationes Decidendi: Entscheidungbegründungen bei den älteren römischen Juristen bis Labeo I. Innsbruck, 1969.
Jolowicz, H. F. and Nicholas, B. Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law. 3rd edn. Cambridge, 1972.
Kaser, M. Das römische Zivilprozessrecht. Munich, 1966.
Kaser, M. Das römische Privatrecht. 2nd edn. Vol. 1 Munich, 1971; Vol. II Munich, 1975.
Kaser, M."Ius Honorarium” und “Ius Civile"’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte 101 (1984).Google Scholar
Koschaker, P. Europa und das römische Recht. 4th edn. Munich, 1966.
Krampe, C. Proculi Epistulae: eine Friühklassische Juristenschrift. Karlsruhe, 1970.
Kunkel, W. Herkunft und Soziale Stellung der römischen juristen. 2nd edn. Graz–Vienna–Cologne, 1967.
Lenel, O. Palingenesia Iuris Chilis. Leipzig, 1889; repr. 1960.
Lenel, O. Das Edictum Perpetuum. 3rd edn. Leipzig, 1927; repr. 1974.
Liebs, D.Rechtsschulen und Rechtsunterricht im Principat’, Temporini, H., Haase, W. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der neueren Forschung. Berlin and New York, 1972II, 15 (1976).Google Scholar
Litewski, W.Die römische Appellation in Zivilsachen’, Temporini, H., Haase, W. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der neueren Forschung. Berlin and New York, 1972II, 14 (1982).Google Scholar
Martini, R. Le definizioni deigiuristi romani. Milan, 1966.
Mayer-Maly, T.Proculus’, Pauly, A. F. et al., Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart 1894– S.V. (1957).Google Scholar
Millar, F. The Emperor in the Roman World (31 b.c.–a.d. 337). London, 1977.
Nörr, D.Pomponius: oder “Zum Geschichtsverständnis der römischen Juristen”’, Temporini, H., Haase, W. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms im Spiegel der neueren Forschung. Berlin and New York, 1972ll, 15 (1976).Google Scholar
Nörr, D.Planung in der Antike: Über die Ehegesetze des Augustus’, in Baier, H. (ed.) Freiheit und Sachzwang: Beiträge zu Ehren H. Schelskys,. Opladen, 1977.Google Scholar
Nörr, D.I giuristi romani: tradizionalismo o progresso?’, Bullettino dell'Istituto di Diritto Romano 84 (1981).Google Scholar
Nörr, D.C. Cassius Longinus: der Jurist als Rhetor (Bemerkungen zu Tacitus, Ann. 14.42 ff)’, in Heine, H. (ed.) Althistorische Studien H. Bengtson, 187–222. Wiesbaden, 1983.Google Scholar
Nörr, D.Zur Biographie des Juristen C. Cassius Longinus’, in Sodalitas: scritti inonore di A. Guarino VI. 2957-78. Naples,1987.Google Scholar
Pernice, A. Labeo: Römisches Privatrecht im Ersten Jahrhundert der Kaiserzeit. 3 vols. Halle, 1873–1900.
Pugliese, G. II Processo Civile Romano II: 11 processo formulare 1. Milan, 1963.
Rogers, R. S.Ateius Capito and Tiberius’, in Synteleia V. Arangio-Ruiz 1 Naples, 1964.Google Scholar
Röhle, R.Praetor Fideicommissarius’, Revue internationale des droits de l'antiquité 15 (1968).Google Scholar
Rotondi, G. Lege spublicae populi romani. Milan, 1912; repr. with appendix, 1962.
Sargenti, M.Considerazioni sul potere normativo imperiale’, in Sodalitas: Scritti in Onore di A. Guarino VI Naples, 1984.Google Scholar
Scacchetti, M. G.Note sulle differenze di metodo fra Sabiniani e Proculiani’, in Studi in Onore di A. Biscardi V. Milan, 1984.Google Scholar
Schiller, A. A. Roman Lam: Mechanisms of Development. The Hague–Paris– New York, 1978.
Schulz, F. History of"Roman Legal Science. Oxford, 1946.
Seidl, E.Labeos geistiges Profil, in Studi in Onore di E. Volterra 1. Milan, 1971.Google Scholar
Siber, H.Plautius’, Pauly, A. F. et al., Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart 1894– S.V. (1951).Google Scholar
Stein, P.The relations between grammar and law in the early principate: the beginning of analogy’, La Critica del Testo 11. Florence, 1971.Google Scholar
Stein, P.The two schools of jurists in the early principate’, Cambridge Law Journal 31 (1972).Google Scholar
Strzelecki, W. C. Atei Capitonis Fragmenta. Leipzig, 1967.
Sturm, F.Pegaso: un giureconsulto dell'epoca di Vespasiano’, Atti del Congresso Internazionale di Studi Vespasianei. Rieti, 1981.Google Scholar
Syme, R. The Augustan Aristocracy. Oxford, 1986.
Talbert, R. J. A. The Senate of Imperial Rome. Princeton, 1984.
Wieacker, F. Vom römischen Recht. 2nd edn. Stuttgart, 1961.
Wieacker, F.Augustus und die Juristen seiner Zeit’, Revue de l'histoire du droit (= Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis) 37 (1969).Google Scholar
Wieacker, F.Respondere ex auctoritate principis’, in Ankum, J. A. et al. (eds.) Satura Roberto Feenstra oblata, 71–94. Fribourg, 1985.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×