Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:40:37.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - ‘Adoption Aesthetics’

from PART IV - NATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL, TRANSGLOBAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

John McLeod
Affiliation:
Professor of Postcolonial and Diaspora Literatures at the School of English, the University of Leeds
Deirdre Osborne
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London
Get access

Summary

In 1965, the International Social Service of Great Britain collaborated with the Sociology Department of Bedford College, University of London, to set up the British Adoption Project. The Project's aim was to offer particular support in securing adoption placements for fifty-three children described as ‘born in Britain of Asian, African, West Indian or mixed racial parentage’. The necessity of the Project emerged from a perceived anomaly in adoption practices more widely in post-war Britain: namely, that while such children constituted a minority of infants in care and awaiting adoption, a disproportionate number of ‘coloured’ children, to use the problematic racialising terminology at the time, struggled to be placed in adoptive families. Although official records were rarely kept, Diana Kareh noted in 1970 that:

for every coloured child accepted and placed by a society, at least one other fails to attract adoptive parents. The figures for 1966…show that 445 non-white children were legally adopted throughout the United Kingdom. At the same time a total of 856 children were known by agencies and statutory societies to be in need of adopters.

The incidence of such children in the care system was due to a number of factors. The biggest constituency were mixed-race, placed in care usually by white birth-mothers struggling to cope with the social stigma attached to conceiving a child both illegitimately and with a black partner. Few such women were able to contend with the formidable economic difficulties involved in raising a child as a lone parent remote from the support of partners or family. In such dire social straits, surrendering children seemed the best way of providing a more secure future for them. Other black and mixed-race children were placed in care or with foster-families by parents seeking to cope on modest incomes, but who sought to maintain contact when they could, and hoped one day to bring them back into a family environment – a phenomenon recorded in Isha McKenzie-Mavinga and Thelma Perkins's memoir, In Search of Mr McKenzie: Two Sisters’ Quest for an Unknown Father (1991). Birth-parents who surrendered black and mixed-race children into care were often hard-up migrants, poor working-class couples, or single women, often white, with meagre, if any, means of support.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • ‘Adoption Aesthetics’
    • By John McLeod, Professor of Postcolonial and Diaspora Literatures at the School of English, the University of Leeds
  • Edited by Deirdre Osborne, Goldsmiths, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to British Black and Asian Literature (1945–2010)
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781316488546.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • ‘Adoption Aesthetics’
    • By John McLeod, Professor of Postcolonial and Diaspora Literatures at the School of English, the University of Leeds
  • Edited by Deirdre Osborne, Goldsmiths, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to British Black and Asian Literature (1945–2010)
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781316488546.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • ‘Adoption Aesthetics’
    • By John McLeod, Professor of Postcolonial and Diaspora Literatures at the School of English, the University of Leeds
  • Edited by Deirdre Osborne, Goldsmiths, University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to British Black and Asian Literature (1945–2010)
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781316488546.013
Available formats
×