Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Gadamer
- 2 Gadamer’s Basic Understanding of Understanding
- 3 Getting it Right
- 4 Hermeneutics, Ethics, and Politics
- 5 The Doing of the Thing Itself
- 6 Gadamer on the Human Sciences
- 7 Lyric as Paradigm
- 8 Gadamer, the Hermeneutic Revolution, and Theology
- 9 Hermeneutics in Practice
- 10 Gadamer’s Hegel
- 11 Gadamer’s Relation to Heidegger and Phenomenology
- 12 The Constellation of Hermeneutics, Critical Theory, and Deconstruction
- Bibliography
- Index
12 - The Constellation of Hermeneutics, Critical Theory, and Deconstruction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2006
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Gadamer
- 2 Gadamer’s Basic Understanding of Understanding
- 3 Getting it Right
- 4 Hermeneutics, Ethics, and Politics
- 5 The Doing of the Thing Itself
- 6 Gadamer on the Human Sciences
- 7 Lyric as Paradigm
- 8 Gadamer, the Hermeneutic Revolution, and Theology
- 9 Hermeneutics in Practice
- 10 Gadamer’s Hegel
- 11 Gadamer’s Relation to Heidegger and Phenomenology
- 12 The Constellation of Hermeneutics, Critical Theory, and Deconstruction
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
“Hermeneutics,” “critical theory,” and “deconstruction” are the names of three intellectual orientations that have dominated continental philosophical debates during the latter part of the twentieth century. Although each of these orientations has its own complex lineage and affinities, they have nevertheless come to be associated with three outstanding thinkers: Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jöurgen Habermas, and Jacques Derrida. At the most abstract level, all three exhibit what has come to be called the “linguistic turn.” The concern with language is central to their philosophic investigations. Yet when we turn to what they mean by language, what they stress in their analyses, what consequences they draw from their reflections, their differences are initially much more striking than anything that they share in common. And even when one of these thinkers has addressed the concerns of the others, their encounters have often seemed more like nonencounters - like one of those surrealistic conversations where participants are speaking past each other. Yet there are not only striking differences among these three thinkers, there are also some important overlapping commonalities. It is best to look upon these three thinkers and their characteristic orientations as forming a tensed constellation - one in which their emphatic differences enable us to appreciate their strengths as well as their weaknesses. In this paper, my primary focus will be on Gadamer's philosophic hermeneutics, especially as it bears on questions of coming to grips with modernity and its discontents.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer , pp. 267 - 282Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
- 14
- Cited by