Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T22:25:26.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Reinventing human rights in an era of hyper-globalisation: a few wayside remarks

from Part II - Interconnections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

By
Upendra Baxi
Edited by
Conor Gearty  and
Costas Douzinas
Conor Gearty
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Costas Douzinas
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

Too much has been said about human rights; my apologies for adding more verbiage! In at least a partial defence, I must say that the engaging recent talk and action about ‘reinventing’ human rights may not be entirely diversionary. New human rights frameworks, instruments, norms and standards are constantly invented. Some old human rights frameworks are also being ‘dis-invented’ in the contemporary conjuncture of neoliberalism and wars of and on terror and in our era of hyperglobalisation. Even as the ascendant forms of primitive accumulation of global capital discredit the hard-won insistence on decency and dignity at workplaces, deny minimum wages and repress associational rights of workers, movements of resistance and counter-power reinvent global solidarity rights. The trinity of invention, disinvention and reinvention calls for some labours of understanding; here, all I aspire towards is an elementary grasp of these three notions.

I think that it is high time that we begin to acknowledge that human rights constitute acts of ethical as well as juridico-political manufacture. The idea of human rights is a remarkable recent ethical invention. It is ethical because human rights enunciate the values of human dignity and freedom; it is juridico-political as a socio-technical invention. Human rights are moral (the responsibility that each human owes to the other) and juridical (the responsibility that political authority owes to citizens as well as all subjects within its jurisdiction). Human rights constitute an invention because they generate new signifying systems of values, principles, institutions, movements, practices and languages.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law , pp. 150 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Betsill, M. M. and Corell, E., NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2008)Google Scholar
Caudhill, D., ‘Lacan and Legal Language: Meanings in the Gaps, Gaps in the Meaning’ (1992) 3 (2) Law and Critique169–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, P., Barshack, L. and Schutz, A., Law, Text and Terror: Essays for Peter Legendre (London: Glasshouse Press 2006)Google Scholar
Picciotto, S., Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism (Cambridge University Press 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supiot, A., Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law (London: Verso 2007)Google Scholar
Joas, H., The Creativity of Action (Gains, J. and Keast, P., trans.) (Cambridge: Polity 1996)Google Scholar
Pottage, A., ‘Introduction: The Fabrication of Persons and Things’, in Pottage, A. and Mundy, M. (eds.), Law, Anthropology, and the Construction of the Social: Making Things and Persons (New York: Cambridge University Press 2004) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P. N., ‘Infrastructure and Modernity: Force, Time, and Social Organization in the History of Sociotechnical Systems’, in Misa, T. J., Brey, P. and Feenberg, A. (eds.), Modernity and Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2003) 188.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E., The Age of Revolution: 1979–1848 (London: Random House 1962) 1.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., Language, the Unknown: An Initiation into Linguistics (Menke, A., trans.) (New York: Columbia University Press 1989) 265–72.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J., Revolution in Poetic Language (Roudiez, L. S., trans.) (New York: Columbia University Press 1984) 15.Google Scholar
Gandhi, M., The Hind Swaraj and Indian Home Rule (1909)
Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari’a (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2008)
Perry, M. J., The Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries (New York: Oxford University Press 1998) 5.Google Scholar
Freamon, B. K., ‘Martyrdom, Suicide, and the Islamic Law of War: A Short Legal History’ (2003) 27 Fordham International Law Journal299–369.Google Scholar
Brague, R., ‘Are Non-Theocratic Orders Possible?’ (Spring 2006) The Intercollegiate Review3–10.Google Scholar
Fuller, L., The Morality of Law (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, revised edn 1969) 5, 28Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T. M., Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2002)Google Scholar
Baxi, U., The Future of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O., ‘The Dark Side of Human Rights’ (2005) 81 (2) International Affairs430.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. A., Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge University Press 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L., ‘Evil and Forgiveness: The Possibility of Moral Redemption’, in Veltman, A. and Norlock, K. J. (eds.), Evil, Political Violence, and Forgiveness: Essays in Honour of Claudia Card (New York: Lexington Books 2009) 115.Google Scholar
Butler, J., Laclau, E. and Žižek, S., Contingency, Hegemony,Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (London: Verso 2000)Google Scholar
Turner, B. S., ‘The End(s) of Humanity: Vulnerability and the Metaphors Membership’ The Hedgehog Review (Summer 2001)Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1961)Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Q., After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency (Brassier, R., trans.) (London: Continuum 2008)Google Scholar
Israel, J. L., Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752 (Oxford University Press 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallar, G., The Rights of Strangers: Theories of International Hospitality, the Global Community, and Political Justice since Vitoria (London: Ashgate 2002)Google Scholar
Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals (Oxford University Press 1952) 56–78.Google Scholar
Hare, , ‘What is Wrong with Slavery’ (1979) 8 (2) Philosophy & Public Affairs1103–1212.Google Scholar
Isaac, J. C., ‘A New Guarantee on Earth: Hannah Arendt on Human Dignity and the Politics of Human Rights’ (1996) 90 (1) American Political Science Review61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justice M. Hidayatuallah, in saying this in Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan [1965) 1 SCR 933
Krishnaswamy, S., Democracy and Constitutionalism in India (Delhi: Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Murphy, F. J., ‘The Problem of Overridingness’ (1998) 36 (2) The Southern Journal of Philosophy5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tännsjö, T., From Reasons to Norms: On the Basic Questions in Ethics (Dordrecht/Heidelberg: Springer 2010) 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxi, U., ‘Public and Insurgent Reason: Adjudicatory Leadership in a Hyper-Globalizing World’, in Gill, S. (ed.), Global Crises and the Crisis of Global Leadership (Cambridge University Press 2011) 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H., The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Bruce 1973)Google Scholar
Baxi, U., “‘A Report for all Seasons?”: Small Notes on Reading In Larger Freedom’, in Kumar, C. R. and Srivastva, D. (eds.), Human Rights and Development: Law, Policy, and Governance (Hong Kong: Lexis/Nexis 2006) 495–514Google Scholar
Baxi, , ‘What May the Third World Expect from International Law?’ (2006) 27 Special Issue: Third World Quarterly713–25.Google Scholar
Baxi, U., ‘Politics of Reading Human Rights: Inclusion and Exclusion within the Production of Human rights’, in Meckled-García, S. and Çali, B., The Legalization of Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Human Rights and Human Rights Law (London: Routledge 2006) 179–84.Google Scholar
Le Bor, A., ‘Complicity with Evil’: The United Nations in an Age of Modern Genocide (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 2006)Google Scholar
Hagan, J. and Rymond-Richmond, W., Darfur and the Crime of Genocide (Cambridge University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartov, O., Mirrors of Destruction: War, Genocide, and Modern Identity (Oxford University Press 2000)Google Scholar
Clarke, K. M., The Fictions of Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Legal Pluralism in Sub-Saharan Africa (New York: Cambridge University Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douzinas, C., ‘Human Rights, Humanism, and Desire’ (2001) 6 Angelaki197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saleeci, R., The Spoils of Freedom: Psychoanalysis and Feminism After the Fall of Socialism (London: Routledge 1994) 127;Google Scholar
Douzinas, C., The End of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart 2000) 312–18.Google Scholar
Guha, R., in a book entitled Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India (Cambridge University Press 2007)Google Scholar
Birmingham, P., Hannah Arendt and Human Rights: The Predicament of Common Responsibility (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press 2006)Google Scholar
Párekh, S., Hannah Arendt and the Challenge of Modernity: A Phenomenology of Human Rights (London: Routledge 2008)Google Scholar
Rancière, J., ‘Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man?’ (2004) 103 (2–3) South Atlantic Quarterly307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, S., ‘Against Human Rights’ (2005) 34 New Left Review115–31)Google Scholar
Ehrenfreund, N., The Nuremberg Legacy: How the Nazi War Crimes Trials Changed the Course of History (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2007)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×