Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:15:59.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Catarina Dutilh Novaes
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Stephen Read
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbo of Fleury, . 1966. Opera inedita I. Syllogismorum categoricum et hypotheticorum enodatio. Vyver, A. Van de (ed.). Bruges: De Tempel.
Abelard, Peter. 1919. ‘Glossule super Porphyrium’, in Logica ingredientibus’. In Abelard 1919–1933, I.
Abelard, Peter. 1919–1933. Peter Abaelards Philosophische Schriften. Geyer, Bernhard (ed.). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 21. Münster: Aschendorff.
Abelard, Peter. 1933. Logica ‘nostrorum petitioni sociorum’. In Abelard 1919–1933, IV.
Abelard, Peter. 1956. Dialectica. Rijk, L. M. De (ed.). Assen: Van Gorcum.
Abelard, Peter. 1970. Dialectica, second edition. Rijk, L. M. de (ed.). Assen: Van Gorcum.
Abelard, Peter. 2010a. Glossae super Periermeneias. Jacobi, K. and Strub, C. (eds.). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaevalis 206, Turnhout: Brepols.
Abelard, Peter. 2010b. Historia Calamitatum. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger.
‘Ajam, R. 1985–1986. Al-Manṭiq ‘inda al-Fārābī, three volumes. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq.
Albert of Saxony, . 1490. Sophismata. Paris: George Vuolf.
Albert of Saxony, . 2002. Albert of Saxony's Twenty-five Disputed Questions on Logic: A Critical Edition of His Quaestiones circa Logicam. Leiden: Brill.
Albert of Saxony, . 2010. Logica. Hamburg: Meiner.
Albert the Great, . 1890. Liber I Priorum Analyticorum. In Borgnet, A (ed.), Opera omnia. Paris: Vives, I.
Alcuin, . 1863. Patrologia latina 101.
Al-Fārābī, . 1960. Commentary on Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias (De Interpretatione). Kutsch, W. J. and Marrow, S. (eds.). Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique.
Al-Fārābī, . 1971. Kitāb al-Khaṭāba. Deux ouvrages inédits sur la Rhétorique. I. Langhade, J. (ed. and tr.). Didascalia in Rhetoricam Aristotelis ex glosa Alpharabi(i). II. Grignaschi, M. (ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq.
Al-Fārābī, . 1985–1986. Kitāb al-Taḥlīl (The Book of Analysis). In R. ‘Ajam 1985–1986.
Al-Fārābī, . 1987. Kitāb al-Burhān wa-Kitāb Sharā’iṭ al-yaqīn maʽa Taʽālīq Ibn Bājja ʽalā al-Burhān. Fakhry, M. (ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq.
Al-Fārābī, . 2005. Iḥṣāʼ al-‛ulūm. Amīn, ‘U. (ed.). Paris: Dār Bibliyūn.
Al-Ghazali, . 1965. Tractatus de logica. In Lohr, C (ed.), ‘Logica Algazelis: Introduction and Critical Text’. Traditio 21: 223–290.Google Scholar
Al-Ghazali, . 1969. Logica et philosophia. Frankfurt: Minerva.
Anglicus, Robertus. 2005. ‘Scriptum super Libro Porphyrii’. In Piché, D. (ed.), Le problème des universaux à la Faculté des Arts de Paris entre 1230–1260. Paris: Vrin, 264–333.
Anonymous, . 1882. ‘Dialectica’. In Piper, Paul (ed.), Die Schriften Notkers und seiner Schule. Freiburg and Tübingen: Mohr, lvi–lxxv.
Anonymous, . 1967. ‘Introductiones Montane minores’. In De Rijk 1962–1967, II, 7–71.
Anonymous, . 1981. ‘De locis argumentationum’. In Yukio, Iwakuma, ‘Instantiae: A Study of Twelfth Century Technique of Argumentation with an Edition of Ms. Paris BN lat. 6674 f. 1–5’. Cahiers de l'Institute du Moyen Âge Grec et Latin 38: 12–60.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . 1983. ‘Compendium Logicae Porretanum’. Ebbesen, Sten, Fredborg, Margareta Karin and Nielsen, Lauge Olaf (eds.). Cahiers de l'Institute du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 46: 1–93.Google Scholar
Anonymous, . 2004. ‘De complexe significabilibus’, in Sophistria ‘Quoniam quatuor’. In Bos, E. P. (ed.), Logica modernorum in Prague about 1400. Leiden: Brill, §§ 85 and 86.
Aouad, Maroun. 2002. Averroès, Commentaire moyen à la ‘Rhétorique’ d'Aristote Édition critique du texte arabe et traduction française, three volumes. Union Académique Internationale, Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi, Averrois Opera, Series A: Averroes Arabicus, XVII. Paris: Vrin.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1962. Aristotle: On Interpretation. Commentary by St. Thomas, and Cajetan, . Oesterle, Jean T. (tr.). Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1995. Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics. Rowan, John P (tr.). South Bend, IN: Dumb Ox Books.
Aquinas, Thomas. 2000. S. Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia, recognovit ac instruxit Enrique Alarcón automato electronico Pompaelone ad Universitatis Studiorum Navarrensis aedes a MM A.D. URL www.corpusthomisticum.org/iopera.html(last accessed 30 April 2016).
Aristotle, . 1965. Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Barnes, J. (ed.), two volumes. Princeton University Press.
Averroes: see Ibn Rushd.
Avicenna: see Ibn Sīnā.
Bacon, Roger. 1986. ‘Summulae dialectices: I. De termino, II. De enuntiatione’. de Libera, A. (ed.), Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 53: 139–289.Google Scholar
Badawi, Abd al-Rahman. 1947. Aristu Inda l-Arab /Aristote chez les Arabes. Cairo: La Renaissance Egyptienne.
Badawi, Abd al-Rahman. 1948–1952. Organon Aristotelis in versione Arabica antiqua, three volumes. Cairo: Librairie al-Nahḍa al-miṣrīya. Also published as Manṭiq Arisṭū, three volumes. Al-Kuwait-Beirut: Wikālat al-Maṭbūʽāt-Dār al-Qalam, 1980.
Badawi, Abd al-Rahman. 1971. Commentaires sur Aristote: Perdus en grec, et autres épîtres. Beirut: Dar el-Mach-req.
Bahmanyār, . 1970. Al-Taḥṣīl. Mutahheri, M. (ed.). Tehran: Dānishkādeh-i Ilāhīyāt va Maʿārif-i Islāmī.
Bergsträsser, G. 1925. Ḥunain ibn Isḥāq über die syrischen und arabischen Galen Übersetzungen. Leipzig: Brockhaus.
Billingham, Richard. 1982. ‘Terminus est in quem sive Speculum puerorum’. In De Rijk, Lambertus M. (ed.), Some Fourteenth Century Tracts on the Probationes Terminorum. Nijmegen: Ingenium, 45–186.
Billingham, Richard. 1987a. ‘De significato propositionis’. In Fitzgerald, M. J. (ed.), Richard Brinkley's Theory of Sentential Reference: ‘De significato propositionis’ from Part V of His ‘Summa logicae’. Leiden: Brill, 143–150.
Billingham, Richard. 1987b. ‘Utrum idem est Sortes et Sortem esse’. In Fitzgerald, M. J. (ed.), Richard Brinkley's Theory of Sentential Reference: ‘De significato propositionis’ from Part V of his ‘Summa logicae’. Leiden: Brill, 125–142.
Billingham, Richard. 2003. ‘De Consequentiis’. In Weber, S. (ed.), Richard Billingham ‘De Consequentiis’ mit Toledo-Kommentar. Amsterdam: Grüner, 27–78.
Boethius, A. M. S. 1877. Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermeneias: Editio Prima. Meiser, C. (ed.). Leipzig: Teubner.
Boethius, A. M. S. 1906. In Isagogen Porphyrii Commentorum Editionis Secundae, Brandt, S. (ed.), Vienna/Leipzig, 135–348.
Boethius, A. M. S. 1969. De hypotheticis syllogismis. Obertello, L. (ed.), with Italian translation. Brescia: Paideia.
Boethius, A. M. S. 1990. ‘De topicis differentiis’. In Nikitas, D. Z. (ed.), Boethius’ De topicis differentiis und die byzantinische Rezeption dieses Werkes. The Academy of Athens, 1–92. The text is also printed in Migne, J. P. (ed.), 1844–1855, Patrologia Latina, LXIV, cols. 1173B–1216D.
Boethius, A. M. S. 2008. De syllogismo categorico. Thörnqvist, Christina Thomsen (ed.). University of Gothenburg.
Bradwardine, Thomas. 2010. Insolubilia. Read, Stephen (ed. and tr.). Leuven: Peeters.
Brinkley, Richard. 1987. ‘De significato propositionis’. In Fitzgerald, M. J. (ed.), Richard Brinkley's Theory of Sentential Reference. ‘De significato propositionis’ from Part V of His ‘Summa logicae’. Leiden: Brill, 34–116.
Buridan, John. 1513. Quaestiones super decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. [Paris]. Reprinted as Buridan 1968.
Buridan, John. 1957. ‘Tractatus de suppositionibus’. Reina, Maria Elena (ed.). Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 12: 175–208, 323–352.Google Scholar
Buridan, John. 1968. Super decem libros Ethicorum. Frankfurt: Minerva. Reprint of Buridan 1513.
Buridan, John. 1976. Tractatus de Consequentiis. Hubien, H. (ed.). Louvain: Presses Universitaires.
Buridan, John. 1977. Sophismata. Scott, T. K. (ed.). Stuttgart: Froommann Holzboog.
Buridan, John. 2001. Summulae de Dialectica: An Annotated Translation, with a Philosophical Introduction by Gyula Klima. Klima, G. (ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Buridan, John. 2015. Treatise on Consequences. Read, Stephen (tr.). New York: Fordham University Press.
Buridan, John. n.d. Iohannis Buridani Quaestiones in duos libros Aristotelis Priorum Analyticorum. Hubien, Herbert (ed.). Unpublished typescript. URL http://www.logicmuseum.com/wiki/Authors/Buridan/Quaestiones_in_analytica_priora (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Burley, Walter. 1497. ‘Liber Praedicamentorum’. In Expositio super Artem veterem Porphyrii et Aristotelis. [Venice], fol. c3va–h2vb.
Burley, Walter. 1955. De Puritate Artis Logicae Tractatus Longior. Boehner, P. (ed.). Franciscan Institute Publications, Text Series No. 9. St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute.
Burley, Walter. 1972. De suppositionibus. Brown, S. F. (ed.), ‘Walter Burleigh's Treatise De suppositionibus and Its Influence on William of Ockham’. Franciscan Studies 32: 15–64.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter. 1973. ‘Commentary on Aristotle's On Interpretation’. Brown, S., ‘Walter Burley's Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias’. Franciscan Studies 33: 45–134.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter. 1974. Quaestiones in librum Perihermeneias. Brown, S. F. (ed), ‘Walter Burley's Quaestiones in librum Perihermeneias’. Franciscan Studies 34: 200–295.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter. 1980. De consequentiis (1300). In Green-Pedersen, N. J. (ed.), ‘Walter Burley's “De Consequentiis”: An Edition’. Franciscan Studies, 40: 102–166.Google Scholar
Burley, Walter. 1988. ‘Obligations (selections)’. In Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E. (eds.), The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts. Logic and the Philosophy of Language 1. Cambridge University Press, 369–412.
Chatton, Walter. 1989. Reportatio et Lectura super Sententias. Collatio ad librum primum et prologus. Wey, J. C. (ed.). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Dānish Pazhūh, M.-T. (ed.). 1978. Mantiq ibn al-Muqaffa. Tehran.
Dānish Pazhūh, M.-T. 1987–1989. Al-Manṭiqiyyāt li-al-Fārābī, three volumes. Qum: Maktabat Āyat Allāh al-ʽUẓmā al-Marʽashī.
Dānish Pazhūh, M.-T. 2000. On the Purity of the Art of Logic: The Shorter and the Longer Treatises. Spade, Paul Vincent (tr.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dawānī, Jalāl al-Dīn. 1887. Sharh Tahdhīb al-manṭiq. Istanbul: Haci Muharrem Efendi Matba'asi. [Printed with the Gloss of Mir Abu l-Fath (d. 1568) and the Tahdhīb al-manṭiq of Taftāzānī].
De Monte, Lambertus. 1490. Copulata omnium tractatuum Petri hyspani etiam Sincategorematum et Parvorum logicalium cum textu secundum doctrinam divi Thome Aquinatis iuxta processum Magistrorum Colonie in bursa Montis regentium. [Cologne].
Dorp, John. 1965. Perutile Compendium Totius Logicae Joannis Buridani [Reprint of 1499 edition]. Frankfurt: Minerva.
Duns Scotus, John. 1891. Quaestiones super universalia, super praedicamenta, sup lib. I Perihermenias Aristotelis, In II librum Perihermenias, Secundi Opeis Perihermenias. In Wadding, L. (ed.) Opera Omnia, vol. 1. Paris: Vives.
Duns Scotus, John. 1950. Ordinatio I, dd. 1–3. Vatican: editio Vaticana, vol. II.
Duns Scotus, John. 1963. Ordinatio I, dd. 26–48. Vatican: editio Vaticana, vol. V.
Duns Scotus, John. 1999. ‘Quaestiones super Praedicamenta Aristotelis’. In Andrews, R., Etzkorn, G., Gal, G., Green, R., Noone, T. and Wood, R. (eds.), Opera Philosophica. St Bonaventure University, I, 249–566.
Duns Scotus, John. 2004a. ‘Quaestiones in duos libros Perihermeneias. In librum primum’. In Andrews, R. and Bazàn, B. C. (eds.), Opera Philosophica. St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, II, 135–190.
Duns Scotus, John. 2004b. ‘Quaestiones in primum librum Perihermeneias’. In Andews, R and Bazàn, B. C. (eds.), Opera Philosophica. St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, II, 43–132.
Eriugena, John Scottus. 1987. Periphyseon. Sheldon-Williams, I. P. (tr.), revised by O'Meara, John J.. Montreal: Bellarmin.
Eriugena, John Scottus. 1996–2003. Periphyseon, five volumes. Jeauneau, Édouard (ed.). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Medievalis 161–165. Turnhout: Brepols.
Feribrigge, Richard. 1978. ‘Tractatus de veritate propositionum’. In Paul of Venice, Logica magna, secunda pars. Punta, F. Del (ed.). Oxford University Press, 215–236.
Ferrer, Vincent. 1977. Tractatus de Suppositionibus. Trentman, John A. (ed.). Stuttgart: Frommann-Hozlboog.
Fland, Robert. 1976. Consequentiae. In Spade, P. V. (ed.), ‘Robert Fland's Consequentiae: An Edition’. Mediaeval Studies 38: 54–84.Google Scholar
Fland, Robert. 1980. Obligationes. In Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.), ‘Robert Fland's Obligationes: An Edition’. Medieval Studies 42: 41–60.Google Scholar
Fonseca, Pedro da (Fonseca, Petrus). 1964. Institutionum Dialecticarum libri octo. Gomes, Joaquim Ferreira (ed.). Universidade de Coimbra.
Garlandus, . 1959. Dialectica. Rijk, L. M. De (ed.). Assen: Van Gorcum.
Gregory of Rimini, . 1978. Lectura super primum et secundum Sententiarum. Marcolino, V. and Trapp, D. (eds.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Gyekye, K. 1975. Ibn al-Ṭayyib's Commentary on Porphyry's Eisagoge. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq.
Gyekye, K. 1979. Arabic Logic, Ibn al-Ṭayyib's Commentary on Porphyry's Eisagoge. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Heytesbury, William. 1979. On “Insoluble” Sentences: Chapter One of his Rules for Solving Sophisms. Spade, Paul Vincent (tr.). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Hopton, Henry. 1494. ‘Omnis propositio est vera vel falsa (Pseudo-Heytesbury's De veritate et falsitate propositionis)’. In Heytesbury, William, Tractatus de sensu composito et diviso. Venice: Bonetus Locatellus, fol. 183va–188rb.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Nadīm, . 1988. Kitāb al-Fihrist. Tajaddud, R. (ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Masīra.
Ibn Rushd, (= Averroes). 1562. Aristotelis omnia quae extant opera … Averrois Cordubensis in ea opera omnes, qui ad haec usque tempora pervenere, commentarii. [Venice].
Ibn Rushd, 1962. Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois Commentariis. Venice 1562–1574, reprint Frankfurt: Minerva.
Ibn Rushd, . 1977. Averroës’ Three Short Commentaries on Aristotle's ‘Topics’, ‘Rhetoric’, and ‘Poetics’. Butterworth, Charles (ed. and tr.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Ibn Rushd, . 1989. Al-Kulliyyāt fī al-ṭibb, Shaybān, S. and al-Ṭālibī, ʽA (eds.), al-Rūbī, A. Sh. (rev.). Cairo: al-Hayʼa al-Miṣriyya al-ʽĀmma li-al-Kitāb.
Ibn Sīnā (= Avicenna), . 1910. Manṭiq al-mashriqiyyīn. Cairo: al-Maktaba al-Salafiyya.
Ibn Sīnā (= Avicenna), . 1952. Resāla-ye manṭeq-e dāneshnāme-ye ‛alāʼī (Treatise on Logic of the Book of Wisdom for ʾAlā’-ad-Dawla). Moʽin, M. and Meshkāt, S. M. (eds.). Tehran: Anjoman-e Āthār-e Melli.
Ibn Sīnā (= Avicenna), . 1958. Al-Shifāʾ, al-Manṭiq VII: al-Safsaṭa. El-Ehwany, A. F. (ed.). Cairo: al-Maṭbaʾa al-Amīriyya.
Ibn Sīnā (= Avicenna), . 1964. Al-Shifāʾ, al-Manṭiq IV: al-Qiyās. Zayed, S. (ed.). Cairo: al-Hayʾa al-ʾĀmma li-Shuʾūn al-Maṭābiʾ al-Amīriyya.
Ibn Sīnā (= Avicenna), . 1971, Al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, four volumes. Dunyā, S. (ed.), with Ṭūsī's commentary. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif.
Ibn Sīnā (= Avicenna), . 1985. Al-Najāt min al-gharq fī baḥr al-ḍalālāt. Dānishpazūh, M. (ed.). Dāneshgāh Tehran.
Ibn Sīnā (= Avicenna), . 2002. Al-Ishārāt wa-al-tanbīhāt. Zāre‛ī, M.. (ed.). Qom: Būstān-e Ketāb-e Qom.
Ibn Sīnā (= Avicenna), . 2011. Avicenna's Deliverance: Logic. Ahmed, Asad Q. (tr.) with an introduction by Street, Tony. Oxford University Press.
Inati, S. C. 1984. Ibn Sīnā Remarks and Admonitions, Part One: Logic. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
John of Holland, . 1985. Four Tracts on Logic: Suppositiones, Fallacies, Obligationes, Insolubilia. Bos, E. P. (ed.). Nijmegen: Ingenium.
John of Salisbury, . 1929. Metalogicon. Webb, C. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jurjānī, al-Sayyid al-Sharīf. 1861. Ḥāshiyah ‘alā Sharḥ Maṭāli’ al-anwār. Printed as an appendix to Urmawī 1861.
Jurjānī, al-Sayyid al-Sharīf. 1948. Ḥāshiyah ‘ala Sharḥ al-Shamsiyyah. Printed with Kātibī 1948.
Kātibī, Najm al-Dīn. 1948. Al-Risālah al-Shamsiyyah. Cairo: Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.
Kātibī, Najm al-Dīn. 1988. Al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya. Printed in Taḥtānī 1988.
Khūnajī, Afḍal al-Dīn. 2010. Kashf al-asrār ʾan ghawāmiḍ al-afkār. El-Rouayheb, K. (ed.). Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy and Berlin Institute of Islamic Studies, Free University of Berlin.
Kilvington, Richard. 1990. The Sophismata of Richard Kilvington. Kretzmann, N. and Kretzmann, B. (tr.). Cambridge University Press.
Kilwardby, Robert. 1968. In libros Priorum Analyticorum exposition. Printed under the name Romanus, Aegidius. Frankfurt: Minerva.
Kilwardby, Robert. 1976. De orto scientarium. Judy, A. G. (ed.). London: British Academy.
Kilwardby, Robert. 1978. ‘Commentary on the Liber de Sex Principiorum’. In Lewry, P. O. (ed.), Robert Kilwardby's Writings on the Logica vetus, Studied with Regard to Their Teaching and Method. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 390–407.
Kilwardby, Robert. 2016. Notule libri Priorum: Critical Edition, Translation and Notes by Paul Thom and John Scott. Thom, Paul and Scott, John (eds.). Oxford University Press.
Lambert of Lagny (Lambert of Auxerre). 1971. Logica (Summa Lamberti). Alessio, F (ed.). Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice.
Lambert of Lagny (Lambert of Auxerre). 1982. Appellationes. In de Libera, A (ed.), ‘Le Tractatus de appellatione de Lambert de Lagny (Summa Lamberti VIII)’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 48: 227–285.Google Scholar
Lambert of Lagny (Lambert of Auxerre). 2015. Logica or Summa Lamberti. Maloney, Thomas S. (tr.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Lavenham, Richard. 1974. Consequentiae. In Spade, Paul (ed.), ‘Five Logical Tracts by Richard Lavenham’. In O'Donnell, J. R. (ed.), Essays in Honor of Anton Charles Pegis. University of Toronto Press, 70–124.
Lavenham, Richard. 1978. Obligationes. In Spade, Paul Vincent, ‘Richard Lavenham's Obligationes: Edition and Comments’. Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 33: 225–242.Google Scholar
Mair, John. 1519. Inclytarum artium. [Lyon].
Marsilius of Inghen, . 1983. Treatises on the Properties of Terms: A First Critical Edition of the Suppositiones, Ampliationes, Appellationes, Restrictiones and Alienationes, with Introduction, Translation, Notes, and Appendices by Egbert P. Bos. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Melanchthon, Phili. 1963. ‘Erotemata Dialectices’. In Bretschneider, C. (ed.), Corpus Reformatorum, Philippi Melanchthonis opera, quae supersunt omnia. New York: Johnson, XIII, 508–759.
Nicholas of Paris, . 2011. ‘On Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias’. In H. Hansen and A. Maria Mora Marquez (eds.), ‘Nicholas of Paris on Aristotle's Perihermeneias 1–3’. Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 80: 2–88.Google Scholar
Notker, Labeo 1882. ‘De syllogismis’. In Piper, Paul (ed.), Die Schriften Notkers und seiner Schule. Freiburg: Mohr, 596–622.
Ockham, William. 1962. Summa Logicae Pars Secunda et tertiae Prima. Boehner, Philotheus (ed.). St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute.
Ockham, William. 1967. Scriptum in librum primum Sententiarum. Ordinatio. Prologus et Distinctio Prima. Gál, G. and Brown, S. F. (eds.). St Bonaventure, NY, Franciscan Institute.
Ockham, William. 1974a. Summa Logicae. Boehner, Philotheus, Gál, Gideon and Brown, Stephen (eds.). St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute.
Ockham, William. 1974b. Ockham's Theory of Terms: Part I of the Summa Logicae. Loux, M. J. (tr.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Ockham, William. 1978. Venerabilis Inceptoris Guillelmi de Ockham, Expositiones in libros artis logicae prooemium et Expositio in Librum Porphyrii de Praedicabilibus. In Moody, E. A. (ed.), Opera Philosophica II. St Bonaventure University, 1–131.
Ockham, William. 1980. Quodlibeta Septem. Wey, Joseph (ed.). St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute.
O'Donnell, J. 1958. ‘Themistius's Paraphrasis of the Posterior Analytics in Gerard of Cremona's Translation’. Medieval Studies 20: 239–315.Google Scholar
Odo, Gerard. 1997. Logica (Opera Philosophica, vol. I). Rijk, L. M. De (ed.). Leiden: Brill.
Pagus, John. 2012. Rationes super Praedicamenta. In H. Hansen 2012.
Paul of Pergula, . 1961. Logica and Tractatus de Sensu Composito ed Diviso. Brown, Sister Mary Anthony (ed.). St Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute.
Paul of Venice, . 1978. ‘De significato propositionis’, section 2 of his Logica magna, secunda pars. Punta, F. Del (ed.). Oxford University Press, 80–199.
Paul of Venice, . 1988. Logica Magna: Secunda Pars, Tractatus de Obligationibus (= Part II, Fascicule 8). Ashworth, E. J. (ed. and tr.). British Academy Classical and Medieval Logic Texts 5. Oxford University Press.
Paul of Venice, . 1990. Logica Magna: Secunda Pars. Capitula de Conditionali et de Rationali. Hughes, G. E. (ed. and tr.). British Academy Classical and Medieval Logic Texts 6. Oxford University Press.
Paul of Venice, . 2002. Paulus Venetus: Logica Parva. Perreiah, Alan R. (ed.). Leiden: Brill.
Peter of Ailly, . 1499. Conceptus et insolubilia. Paris: Marchant.
Peter of Auvergne, . 1988. ‘Quaestiones super Praedicamentis’. In Andrews, R., Peter of Auvergne's Commentary on Aristotle's Categories: Edition, Translation, and Analysis (Vols. I and II). PhD dissertation, Cornell University, 359–468.
Peter of Spain, . 1972. Tractatus Called afterwards Summule Logicales. Rijk, L. M. de (ed.). Assen: Van Gorcum.
Peter of Spain, . 1992. Syncategoreumata. Rijk, L. M. de (tr. and ed.). Leiden: Brill.
Peter of Spain, . 2014. Summaries of Logic. Copenhaver, Brian (ed.). Oxford University Press.
Porphyry, . 1966. Porphyrii Isagoge, Translatio Boethii et Anonymi Fragmentum vulgo vocatum ‘Liber Sex Principiorum’. Minio-Paluello, L. (ed.). Bruges/Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
Priscian, . 1961. ‘Institutiones grammaticae’. In Keil, H. (ed.), Grammatici latini, II–III. Hildesheim: Olms.
Pseudo-Scotus, . 1639. ‘Questiones super librum primum analyticorum’. In Scotus, John Duns, Opera Omnia. Wadding, L (ed.). Lyons: Laurence Durand, I, 273–341.
Radulphus, Brito. c. 1499. Quaestiones super Artem Veterem, Vercellensis, Johannes Rubeus and Vercellensis, Albertinus (eds.). [Venice].
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. 2003. Manṭiq al-Mulakhkhaṣ, Qaramaleki, A. F. and Asgharinezhad, A. (eds.). Tehran: ISU Press.
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. 2005. Sharḥ al-Ishārāt. Najafzādeh, A. R. (ed.). Tehran: Anjuman Āthār wa-Mafākhir Ferhangi.
Sanūsī, Muḥammad b. Yūsuf. 1875. Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar al-manṭiq. [Cairo].
Shehaby, N. 1973. The Propositional Logic of Avicenna. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Shīrāzī, Quṭb al-Dīn. 2002. Sharḥ Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq. Nourani, A. and Mohaghegh, M. (eds.). Montreal: Institute of Islamic Studies.
Soto, Domingo de. 1529. Summulae. [Burgos].
Soto, Domingo de. 1539–1540. Summulae (aeditio secunda). [Salamanca].
Strode, R. 1974. ‘Tractatus de consequentiis (1360)’. In Seaton, W. K., An Edition and Translation of the Tractatus de consequentiis of Ralph Strode. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
Swyneshed, Roger. 1977. Obligationes. In Spade, Paul Vincent, ‘Roger Swyneshed's Obligationes: Edition and Comments’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 44: 243–285.Google Scholar
Swyneshed, Roger. 1979. ‘Insolubilia’. In Spade, Paul Vincent, ‘Roger Swyneshed's Insolubilia: Edition and Comments’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 46: 177–220.Google Scholar
Taḥtānī, Quṭb al-Dīn al-Rāzī. 1988. Taḥrīr al-qawāʿid al-manṭiqiyya fī sharḥ al-Risāla al-Shamsiyya (1367). Cairo: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-kutub al-ʿarabiyya, Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.
Toledo, Francisco de (Toletus, Franciscus). 1985. Introductio in Dialecticam Aristotelis in Opera omnia philosophica I. Cologne, 1615–1616. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Ṭūsī, Naṣīr al-Dīn. 1971. Ḥall Mushkilāt al-Ishārāt. Printed in Ibn Sīnā 1971.
Ṭūsī, Naṣīr al-Dīn. 1974. ‘Ta'dīl al-mi'yār fī naqd Tanzīl al-afkār’. In Mohaghegh, M. and Izutsu, T. (eds.), Collected Texts and Papers on Logic and Language. Tehran: Anjoman-e Asar va Mafakher-e Farhangi, 137–248.
Ṭūsī, Naṣīr al-Dīn. 2004. Asās al-iqtibās fī l-manṭiq. [Cairo].
Urmawī, Sirāj al-Dīn. 1861. Maṭāli’ al-anwār. Istanbul: Maṭba'ah-i ‘Amire.
Venator, Johannes. 1999. ‘De materia significati propositionis seu significabilis complexe’ (Chapter 9 of Part I of his Logica). Rijk, L. M. de (ed). Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, I, 202–222.
Versor, Johannes. 1586. Petri Hispani Summulae Logicales cum Versorii Parisiensis Clarissima Expositione. Parvorvm item Logicalivm eidem Petro Hispano ascriptum opus. Venice.
Wodeham, Adam. 1990. Lectura secunda in primum librum Sententiarum. Gál, G. and Wood, R. (eds.). St Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.
William of Ockham: See Ockham, William.
William of Sherwood, . 1941. ‘Syncategoremata’. O'Donnell, J. R. (ed.). Medieval Studies 3, 46–93.
William of Sherwood, . 1966. Introduction to Logic. Kretzmann, N. (tr.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
William of Sherwood, . 1968. Treatise on Syncategorematic Words. Kretzmann, N. (tr.) Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
William of Sherwood, . 1995. Introductiones in Logicam. Brands, H. and Kann, C. (ed. and German tr.). Hamburg: Meiner.
William of Sherwood, . 2012. Syncategoremata, edited and translated in German by Kann, C. and Kirchhoff, R.. Hamburg: Meiner.
Wyclif, John. 1986. Summa Insolubilium. Spade, Paul Vincent and Wilson, Gordon Anthony (eds.). Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies.
Zabeeh, F. 1971. Avicenna's Treatise on Logic. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Zimmermann, F.W. 1981. Al-Farabi's Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle's De interpretatione. Oxford University Press.
Adams, M. McCord. 1987. William Ockham. University of Notre Dame Press.
Adamson, P. and Key, A. 2015. ‘Philosophy of Language in the Medieval Arabic Tradition’. In Cameron, M. and Stainton, R. (eds.), Linguistic Meaning: New Essays in the History of the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, 74–99.
Ahmed, Asad Q. 2012. ‘Logic in the Khayrâbâdî School in India: A Preliminary Exploration’. In Cook, M., Haider, N., Rabb, I. and Sayeed, A. (eds.), Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought: Studies in Honor of Professor Hossein Modarressi. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 227–244.
Alwishah, A. and Sanson, D. 2009. ‘The Early Arabic Liar: The Liar Paradox in the Islamic World from the Mid-Ninth to the Mid-Thirteenth Century CE’. Vivarium 47: 97–127.Google Scholar
Amerini, Fabrizio. 2005a. ‘What Is Real? A Reply to Ockham's Ontological Program’. Vivarium 43: 187–212.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 2005b. La Logica di Francesco da Prato. Florence: SISMEL Edizioni del Galluzzo.
Andrews, R. 1993. ‘The Sophistria of Petrus Olai’. In Read, S. (ed.), Sophisms and Medieval Logic and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 3–30.
2008. ‘Thomas Maulevelt's Denial of Substance’. In Newton, Lloyd A. (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's ‘Categories’. Leiden: Brill, 347–368.
Aouad, Maroun. 2003. ‘La Rhétorique. Tradition syriaque et arabe (Compléments)’. In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vol. Supplément. Paris: CNRS-Éditions, 219–223.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1973. ‘The Doctrine of Exponibilia in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries’. Vivarium 11(1):137–167.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1974. Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1978a. ‘Theories of the Proposition: Some Early Sixteenth Century Discussions’. Franciscan Studies 38: 81–121. Reprinted in Ashworth 1985, article IV.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1978b. ‘Multiple Quantification and the Use of Special Quantifiers in Early Sixteenth Century Logic’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19: 599–613. Reprinted in Ashworth 1985, article X.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1979. ‘The “Libelli Sophistarum” and the Use of Medieval Logic Texts at Oxford and Cambridge in the Early Sixteenth Century’. Vivarium 17: 134–158.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1981. ‘Mental Language and the Unity of the Propositions: A Semantic Problem Discussed by Early Sixteenth Century Logicians’. Franciscan Studies 41: 61–96.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1982. ‘The Structure of Mental Language: Some Problems Discussed by Early Sixteenth Century Logicians’. Vivarium 20: 59–83. Reprinted in Ashworth 1985, article V.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1985. Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics. London: Variorum Reprints.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1988. ‘Traditional Logic’. In Schmitt, C. B., Skinner, Q., Kessler, E. and Kraye, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 143–172.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1993. ‘Ralph Strode on Inconsistency in Obligational Disputation’. In Jacobi, K. (ed.), Argumentationstheorie: Scholastische Forschungen zu den logischen und semantischen Regeln korrekten Folgerns. Leiden: Brill, 363–386.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 1994. ‘Obligationes Treatises: A Catalogue of Manuscripts, Editions and Studies’. Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 36: 116–147.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer 2008. ‘Developments in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries’. In Gabbay, D. M. and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 609–643.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 2010. ‘Terminist Logic’. In Pasnau, R. and Dyke, Ch. van (eds.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, I, 146–158.
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 2013a. ‘Descent and Ascent from Ockham to Domingo de Soto: An Answer to Paul Spade’. Vivarium 51: 385–410.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. Jennifer. 2013b. ‘Medieval Theories of Analogy’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2013 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/analogy-medieval/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Ashworth, E. Jennifer and Spade, Paul Vincent. 1992. ‘Logic in Late Medieval Oxford’. In Catto, J. I. and Evans, R. (eds.), The History of the University of Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press, II, 35–64.
Ayers, Robert H. 1979. Language, Logic and Reason in the Church Fathers. Hildesheim: Olms.
Bäck, A. 1987. ‘Avicenna on Existence’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 25: 351–367.Google Scholar
Bäck, A. 1992. ‘Avicenna's Conception of the Modalities’. Vivarium 30(2): 217–255.Google Scholar
Badawi, Abd al-Rahman. 1987. La Transmission de la philosophie grecque au monde arabe, second edition. Paris: Vrin.
Bakker, Paul J. J. M. 2007. ‘Natural Philosophy and Metaphysics in Late Fifteenth-Century Paris. III: The Commentaries on Aristotle by Johannes de Caulaincourt (alias Johannes de Magistris’. Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 49: 195–237.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1981. ‘Boethius and the Study of Logic’. In Gibson, Margaret (ed.), Boethius, His Life, Thought and Influence. Oxford: Blackwell, 73–89.
Barnes, Jonathan. 2007. Truth, etc.: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Oxford University Press.
Beaver, D. I. and Clark, B. Z. 2008. Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Berger, Harald. 1991. ‘Simple Supposition in William of Ockham, John Buridan, and Albert of Saxony’. In Biard, J. (ed.), Itinéraires d'Albert de Saxe. Paris – Vienne au XIVe siècle. Études de philosophie médiévale 69. Paris: Vrin, 31–43.
Bermon, P. 2007. L'assentiment et son objet chez Grégoire de Rimini. Paris: Vrin.
Biard, J. 1989a. Logique et théorie du signe au XIVe siècle. Paris: Vrin.
Biard, J. 1989b. ‘Les sophismes du savoir: Albert de Saxe entre Jean Buridan et Guillaume Heytesbury’. Vivarium 17: 36–50.Google Scholar
Biard, J. 2002. ‘Les controverses sur l'objet du savoir et les complexe significabilia au XIVe siècle’. In Caroti, S. and Celeyrette, J. (eds.), Quia inter doctores est magna dissentio. Les débats de philosophie naturelle à Paris au XIVe siècle. Florence: Olschki, 1–31.
Biard, Joël. 2010. ‘Nominalism in the later Middle Ages’. In Pasnau 2010, II, 661–673.
Biard, Joël. 2015. ‘Albert of Saxony’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2015 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/albert-saxony/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Biard, Joël and Rosier-Catach, Irène (eds.). 2003. La tradition médiévale des Catégories. Paris-Louvain: Peeters.
Biard, Joël and Zini Fosca, Mariani (eds.). 2009. Les lieux de l'argumentation, histoire du syllogisme topique d'Aristote à Leibniz. Turnhout: Brepols.
Black, D. L. 1990. Logic and Aristotle's Rhetoric and Poetics in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.
Black, D. L. 1991. ‘Aristotle's “Peri hermeneias” in Medieval Latin and Arabic Philosophy: Logic and the Linguistic Arts’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21(1): 25–83.Google Scholar
Bobzien, Susan. 2002. ‘A Greek Parallel to Boethius’ De Hypotheticis Syllogismis’. Mnemosyne, Fourth Series 55(3): 285–300.Google Scholar
Bobzien, Susan. 2005. ‘Logic: The Megarics’. In Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 83–92.
Boehner, Philotheus. 1952. Medieval Logic: An Outline of Its Development from 1250 to c. 1400. Manchester University Press.
Bos, E. P. 1987. ‘The Theory of the Proposition According to John Duns Scotus’ Two Commentaries on Aristotle's Perihermeneias’. In Rijk, L. M. De and Braakhius, H. A. G. (eds.), Logos and Pragma: Essays on the Philosophy of Language in Honor of Professor Gabriel Nuchelmans. Nijmegen: Ingenium, 121–140.
Bos, E. P. 2007. ‘Richard Billingham's Speculum Puerorum: Some Medieval Commentaries and Aristotle’. Vivarium 45(2): 360–373.Google Scholar
Bos, E. P. (ed.). 2013. Medieval Supposition Theory Revisited. Leiden: Brill.
Bos, Egbert and Read, Stephen. 2000. Concepts: The Treatises of Thomas of Cleves and Paul of Gelria. Leuven: Peeters.
Braakhuis, H. A. G. 1981. ‘English Tracts on Syncategorematic Terms from Robert Bacon to Walter Burley’. In Braakhuis, H. A. G., Kneepkens, C. H. and Rijk, L. M. de (eds.), English Logic and Semantics: From the End of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockham and Burleigh. Nijmegen: Ingenium, 131–165.
Braakhuis, H. A. G. 1989. ‘School Philosophy and Philosophical Schools: The Semantic-Ontological Views in the Cologne Commentaries on Peter of Spain, and the “Wegestreit”’. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 20: 1–18.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H. A. G. 1998. ‘Obligations in Early Thirteenth-century Paris: The Obligationes of Nicholas of Paris (?)’. Vivarium 36(2): 152–231.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making it Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Broadie, Alexander. 1983. George Lokert: Late-Scholastic Logician. Edinburgh University Press.
Broadie, Alexander. 1985. The Circle of John Mair: Logic and Logicians in Pre-Reformation Scotland. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brower-Toland, S. 2007a. ‘Facts vs. Things. Adam Wodeham and the Later Medieval Debate about Objects of Judgment’. The Review of Metaphysics 60: 597–642.Google Scholar
Brower-Toland, S. 2007b. ‘Ockham on Judgment, Concepts, and the Problem of Intentionality’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37: 76–110.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen. 1973. ‘Walter Burley's Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Perihermeneias’. Franciscan Studies 33: 42–134.Google Scholar
Brown, Stephen. 1974. ‘Walter Burley's Quaestiones in librum Perihermeneias’. Franciscan Studies 34: 200–295.Google Scholar
Brumberg-Chaumont, J. 2013a. ‘Les divisions de la logiques selon Albert le Grand’. In J. Brumberg-Chaumont 2013b, 315–416.
Brumberg-Chaumont, J. (ed.) 2013b. Ad Notitiam ignoti: L'Organon dans la translato studiorum à l'époque d'Albert le Grand. Turnhout: Brepols.
Bulthuis, N. 2014. Walter Burley on the Metaphysics of the Proposition and Its Relation to Language and Thought. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Burnett, Charles (ed.). 2003. Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotle's Logical Texts: The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions. London: Warburg Institute.
Burr, D. 1976. ‘The Persecution of Peter Olivi’. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 66(5): 1–98.Google Scholar
Büttgen, P., Diebler, S. and Rashed, M. (eds.). 1999. Théories de la phrase et de la proposition. De Platon à Averroès. Paris: Editions Rue d'Ulm.
Buytaert, E. M. 1964. ‘The Tractatus Logicae Minor of Ockham’. Franciscan Studies 24: 34–100.Google Scholar
Buytaert, E. M. 1965–1966. ‘The Elementarium Logicae of Ockham’. Franciscan Studies 25: 151–276 and 26: 66–173.Google Scholar
Calverley, E. E. 1933. ‘Al-Abharî's îsâghûjî fî “l-mantiq”’. In The Macdonald Presentation Volume: A Tribute to Duncan Black Macdonald. Princeton University Press, 75–85.
Cameron, M. 2011. ‘Methods and Methodologies: An Introduction’. In Cameron, Margaret and Marenbon, John (eds.), Methods and Methodologies: Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500–1500. Leiden: Brill, 1–26.
Cameron, M. 2012. ‘Meaning: Foundational and Semantic Theories’. In Marenbon, J. (ed.), The Oxford Medieval Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 342–362.
Carroll, Lewis. 1895. ‘What the Tortoise Said to Achilles’. Mind 4: 278–280.Google Scholar
Cesalli, L. 2004. ‘Richard Brinkley. De propositione (Summa logicae, V, 1–5)’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 71: 203–254.Google Scholar
Cesalli, L. 2007. Le réalisme propositionnel: Sémantique et ontologie des propositions chez Jean Duns Scot, Gauthier Burley, Richard Brinkley et Jean Wyclif. Paris: Vrin.
Cesalli, L. 2012. ‘States of Affairs’. In Marenbon, J. (ed.), The Oxford Medieval Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 421–444.
Cesalli, L. 2013. ‘Meaning and Truth’. In Conti, A. (ed), A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician. Leiden: Brill, 87–133.
Cesalli, L. Forthcoming. ‘Modus rei: An Adverbialist Theory of Truthmaking’. In Cesalli, L. and Marenbon, J. (eds.), Facts and States of Affairs. Turnhout: Brepols.
Cesalli, L. and Marenbon, J. (eds.). Forthcoming. Facts and States of Affairs. Turnhout: Brepols.
Chase, Michael. 2007. ‘Did Porphyry Write a Commentary on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics? Albertus Magnus, Alfarabi and Porphyry on Per Se Predication’. In Adamson, Peter (ed.), Classical Arabic Philosophy: Sources and Reception. London: Nifo Aragno, 21–38.
Chase, Michael. 2008. ‘The Medieval Posterity of Simplicius's Commentary on the Categories: Thomas Aquinas and Al-Farabi’. In Newton 2008, 9–29.
Chatti, S. 2016. ‘Existential Import in Avicenna's Modal Logic’.
Clagett, M. 1959. The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Clanchy, M. 1997. Abelard: A Medieval Life. Oxford: Blackwell.
Colish, M. 1990. The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages, two volumes, second edition. Leiden: Brill.
Conti, Alessandro. 1990. ‘Ontology in Walter Burley's Last Commentary on the Ars Vetus’. Franciscan Studies 50: 121–176.Google Scholar
Conti, Alessandro. (ed.). 2013a. A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician. Leiden: Brill.
Conti, Alessandro. 2013b. ‘Semantics and Ontology in Robert Kilwardby's Commentaries on the Logica Vetus’. In Lagerlund, H. and Thom, P. (eds.), The Philosophy of Robert Kilwardby. Leiden: Brill, 65–130.
Coppock, E. and Beaver, D. 2013. ‘Principles of the Exclusive Muddle’. Journal of Semantics 31(3): 371–432.Google Scholar
Corbini, Amos. 2006. La Teoria della scienza nel XIII secolo, i commenti agli Analitici secondi. Tavarnuzze: ed. del Galluzzo.
Corti, Lorenzo and Bruun, Otto (eds.). 2005. Les Catégories et leur histoire. Paris: Vrin.
Courtenay, W. J. 2008. Ockham and Ockhamism. Leiden: Brill.
Crivelli, P. 2004. Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge University Press.
Cross, Richard. 2002. ‘Gregory of Nyssa on Universals’. Vigiliae Christianae 56: 372–410.Google Scholar
Crubellier, Michel. 2014. Aristote, Premiers analytiques (Organon III): Traduction et présentation par Michel Crubellier. Paris: Flammarion.
Dahan, Gilbert and Rosier-Catach, Irène (eds.). 1998. La rhétorique d'Aristote:Traditions et commentaires de l'antiquité au XVIIe siècle. Paris: Vrin.
D'Ancona, Cristina. 2005. ‘Greek into Arabic: Neoplatonism in Translation’. In Adamson, Peter and Taylor, Richard C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 10–31.
De Haas, Frans A. J., Leunissen, Mariska and Martijn, Marije (eds.). 2011. Interpreting Aristotle's Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden: Brill.
Denifle, H. 1889. Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis. Paris: Delalain, I.
Denifle, H. S. and Chatelain, É. L. M. (eds.). 1889–1897. Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis: Sub auspiciis consilii generalis facultatum Parisiensium ex diversis bibliothecis tabulariisque collegit et cum authenticis chartis contulit. Paris: Delalain.
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1962–1967. Logica modernorum, two volumes. Assen: Van Gorcum.
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1963. ‘On the Curriculum of the Arts of the Trivium at St. Gall from c. 850–c. 1000’. Vivarium 1: 35–86.Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1971. ‘The Development of Suppositio Naturalis in Medieval Logic, I: Natural Supposition as Non-contextual Supposition’. Vivarium 9: 71–107.Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1974. ‘Some Thirteenth-century Tracts on the Game of Obligation’. Vivarium 12: 94–123.
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1975. ‘Some Thirteenth-century Tracts on the Game of Obligation II’. Vivarium 13: 22–54.Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1976. ‘Some Thirteenth-century Tracts on the Game of Obligation III’. Vivarium 14: 26–49.Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1980. Die mittelalterlichen Traktate de modo opponendi et respondendi: Einleitung und Ausgabe der einschlägigen Texte. Münster: Aschendorff.
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1982a. ‘Semantics in Richard Billingham and Johannes Venator’. In Maierù, A. (ed.), English Logic in Italy in the 14th and 15th Centuries. Naples: Bibliopolis, 167–183.
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1982b. ‘The Origins of the Theory of the Properties of Terms’. In Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 161–173.
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1985. ‘Walther Burley's Tract De exclusivis: An Edition’. Vivarium 23: 23–54.Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1986. ‘Peter Abelard's Semantics and His Doctrine of Being’. Vivarium 24: 85–127.Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1996. ‘Burley's So-called Tractatus Primus, with an Edition of the Additional Quaestio “Utrum contradictio sit maxima oppositio”’. Vivarium 34: 161–191.Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus M. 1999. Johannes Venator Anglicus: Logica, two volumes. Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann Verlag.
Dod, B. 1982. ‘Aristoteles latinus’. In Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 45–79.
D'Ors, A. 1997. ‘Petrus Hispanus O.P. Auctor Summularum’. Vivarium 35: 21–71.Google Scholar
Dronke, P. (ed.). 1992. A History of Twelfth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Duhem, P. 1906–1913. Etudes sur Léonard de Vinci: Ceux qu'il a lus et ceux qui l'ont lu, three volumes. Paris: A. Hermann.
Duhem, P. 1913–1959. Le système du monde: Histoire des doctrines cosmoloqieus de Platon à Copernic. Paris: A. Hermann.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2004. ‘A Medieval Reformulation of the de dicto / de re Distinction’. In LOGICA Yearbook 2003. Prague: Filosofia, 111–124.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2005. ‘Buridan's consequentia: Consequence and Inference within a Token-based Semantics’. History and Philosophy of Logic 26(4): 277–297.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2007. Formalizing Medieval Logical Theories. Berlin: Springer.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2008a. ‘An Intensional Interpretation of Ockham's Theory of Supposition’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46(3): 365–393.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2008b. ‘Logic in the Fourteenth Century after Ockham’. In Gabbay, D. M. and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook on the History of Logic, vol. 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 433–504.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2009. ‘Medieval Obligationes as a Regimentation of “The Game of Giving and Asking for Reasons”’. In Palis, M. (ed.), LOGICA Yearbook 2008. London: College Publications, 27–41.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2010a. ‘Supposition, Theories of’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 1229–1236.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2010b. ‘Quantification, Theories of’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 1093–1096.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2010c. ‘Truth, Theories of’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 1340–1347.
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2011. ‘Medieval Obligationes as a Theory of Discursive Commitment Management’. Vivarium 49: 240–257.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2012. ‘Reassessing Logical Hylomorphism and the Demarcation of Logical Constants’. Synthese 185: 387–410.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2013. ‘The Ockham-Burley Dispute’. In Conti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Walter Burley. Leiden: Brill, 49–86.
Dutilh Novaes, C. and Spruyt, J. 2015. ‘Those Funny Words: Medieval Theories of Syncategorematic Terms’. In Cameron, M. and Stainton, R. (eds.), Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press, 100–120.
Ebbesen, S. 1981a. ‘Analyzing Syllogisms or Anonymous Aurelianensis III: The (Presumably) Earliest Extant Latin Commentary on the Prior Analytics, and Its Greek Model’. Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 37: 1–20.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. 1981b. Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle's Sophistici Elenchi: A Study of Post-Aristotelian Ancient and Medieval Writings on Fallacies, three volumes. Leiden: Brill.
Ebbesen, Sten. 1981c. ‘Albert the (Great?)'s Companion to the Organon’. In Beckmann, J. P., Honnefelder, L. and Jüssen, G. (eds.), Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalters. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 89–103.
Ebbesen, Sten. 1985. ‘OXYNAT: A Theory about the Origins of British Logic’. In Lewry, P. O. (ed.), The Rise of British Logic. Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1–17.
Ebbesen, Sten. 1988. ‘Concrete Accidental Terms: Late Thirteenth-Century Debates about Problems Relating to Such Terms as “Album”’. In Kretzmann, N. (ed.), Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 107–174.
Ebbesen, Sten. 1990. ‘Boethius as an Aristotelian commentator’. In Sorabji 1990, 373–391.
Ebbesen, Sten. 1996. ‘Anonymi Parisiensis Compendium Sophisticorum Elenchorum: The Uppsala Version’. Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 66: 253–312.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. 1998a. ‘The Paris Arts Faculty: Siger of Brabant, Boethius of Dacia, Radulphus Brito’. In Marenbon 1998, 269–290.
Ebbesen, Sten. 1998b. ‘Language, Medieval Theories of’. In Craig, E. (ed.), Routlege Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, V, 389–404.
Ebbesen, Sten. 2003. ‘The Trivium’. Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 52: 15–24.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, Sten. 2004. ‘Where Were the Stoics in the Late Middle Ages?’ In Zupko, J. and Stange, S. K. (eds.), Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations. Cambridge University Press, 108–131.
Ebbesen, Sten. 2007. ‘The Traditions of Ancient Logic-cum-Grammar in the Middle Ages: What's the Problem?’. In Marenbon 2007, 136–152.
Ebbesen, Sten. 2008. ‘Fragments of Alexander's Commentaries on Analytica posteriora and Sophistici elenchi’. In Ebbesen, S., Greek-Latin Philosophical Interaction. Aldershot: Ashgate, I, 187–202.
Ehrle, Franz. 1925. Der Sentenzenkommentar des Peters von Candia. Franziskanische Studien 9. Münster: Aschendorff.
Elamrani-Jamal, A. 1989. ‘Allinus’. In Dictionaire des philosophes antiques, I, 151–153.
Elamrani-Jamal, A. 1995. ‘Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote: Aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 5(1): 51–74.Google Scholar
Élie, H. 1936. Le signifiable par complexe. Paris: Vrin.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. 2009. ‘Impossible Antecedents and Their Consequences: Some Thirteenth-century Arabic Discussions’. History and Philosophy of Logic 30: 209–225.Google Scholar
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. 2010a. Relational Syllogisms and the History of Arabic Logic. 900–1900. Leiden: Brill.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. 2010b. ‘Introduction’. In Khūnajī 2010, iii–lix.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. 2011. ‘Logic in the Arabic and Islamic World’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 686–692.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. 2012. ‘Post-Avicennan Logicians on the Subject-matter of Logic: Some Thirteenth- and Fourteenth-century Discussions’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 22(1): 69–90.Google Scholar
El-Rouayheb, Khaled. 2016. ‘Theology and Logic’. In Schmidtke, S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology. Oxford University Press. URL http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696703.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199696703-e-009 (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Erismann, Christophe. 2007. ‘The Logic of Being: Eriugena's Dialectical Ontology’. Vivarium 45: 203–218.Google Scholar
Erismann, Christophe. 2011. L'homme commun. Paris: Vrin.
Farge, James K. 1980. Biographical Register of Paris Doctors of Theology 1500–1536. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Ferrari, C. 2006. Der Kategorienkommentar von Abū l-Farağ ʽAbdallāh ibn aṭ-Ṭayyib: Text und Untersuchungen. Leiden: Brill.
Fitzgerald, Michael. 2015. ‘The “Mysterious” Thomas Manlevelt and Albert of Saxony’. History and Philosophy of Logic 36: 129–146.Google Scholar
Fleming, Brian. 1964. Thomas de Bradwardine: Oxford Scholar, Royal Servant and Archbishop of Canterbury. PhD thesis, University of Louvain.
Fortenbaugh, W. P., Huby, P., Sharples, R. W. and Gutas, D. (eds.). 1993. Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Leiden: Brill.
Frede, M. 1974. Die stoische Logik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
Frege, G. 1948. ‘Sense and Reference’. The Philosophical Review 57(3): 209–230.Google Scholar
Fussenegger, G. 1954. ‘“Littera septem sigillorum” contra doctrinam Petri Ioannis Olivi edita’. Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 47: 45–53.Google Scholar
Gál, Gedeon and Wood, Rega. 1980. ‘Richard Brinkley and His Summa Logicae’. Franciscan Studies 40: 59–101.Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. 2003. ‘Complexe significabile and Aristotle's Categories’. In Biard, J. and Rosier-Catach, I. (eds.), La tradition mediévale des Catégories (XIIe – XVe siècle). Louvain: Peeters, 187–205.
Gaskin, R. 2008. The Unity of the Proposition. Cambridge University Press.
Gätje, Helmut. 1982. ‘Simplikios in der arabischen Überlieferung’. Der Islam 59: 6–31.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter T. 1980. ‘Assertion’. In Geach, P. T., Logic Matters. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 254–269.
Georr, K. 1948. Les Catégories d'Aristotle dans leurs versions syro-arabes. Beirut: Dar el-Mach-req.
Gerogiorgakis, S. 2009. ‘The Byzantine Liar’. History and Philosophy of Logic 30: 313–330.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Neil Ward. 1974. ‘Ockham, Wyclif, and the “via moderna”’. Miscellanea Mediaevalia 9: 85–125.Google Scholar
Green, Romuald. 1963. An Introduction to the Logical Treatise De Obligationibus, with Critical Texts of William of Sherwood [?] and Walter Burley. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Green-Pedersen, Niels J. 1984. The Tradition of the Topics in the Middle Ages. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.
Guerlac, Rita. 1979. Juan Luis Vives against the Pseudo-Dialecticians: A Humanist Attack on Medieval Logic. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Guidi, M. and Walzer, R. 1940. Uno Scritto Introduttivo allo Studio di Aristotele. Rome: Bardi.
Gutas, Dimitri. 1993. ‘Aspects of Literary Form and Genre in Arabic Logical Works’. In Burnett, C. (ed.), Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. London: Warburg Institute, 29–76.
Gutas, Dimitri. 1998. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ‘Abbasid Society (Second–Fourth / Eighth–Tenth Centuries). London: Routledge.
Gutas, Dimitri. 2014. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna's Philosophical Works, second edition. Leiden: Brill.
Hadot, Pierre. 1959. ‘Un fragment du commentaire perdu de Boèce sur les Catégories d'Aristote dans le Codex Bernensis 363’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 43: 11–27.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1990. ‘La logique, partie ou instrument de la philosophie’. In Hoffmann, P., Hadot, I. and Luna, C. (ed.), Simplicius, Commentaire sur les Catégories. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, I, 183–186.
Hamesse, J. 1986. ‘Reportatio et transmission des textes’. In Asztalos, M. (ed.), The Editing of Theological and Philosophical Texts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 10–26.
Hanke, Miroslav 2014. ‘The Bricot-Mair Dispute: Scholastic Prolegomena to Non-Compositional Semantics’. History and Philosophy of Logic 35: 148–166.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. (ed.). 2012. John Pagus on Aristotle's Categories: A Study and Edition of the Rationes super Predicamenta Aristotelis. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Hasnawi, Ahmad. 2001. ‘Topic and Analysis: The Arabic Tradition’. In Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Whose Aristotle? Whose Aristotelianism? Aldershot: Ashgate, 28–62.
Hasnawi, Ahmad. 2007. ‘Boèce, Averroès et Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī, témoins des écrits de Thémistius sur les Topiques d'Aristote’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 17: 203–265.Google Scholar
Hasnawi, Ahmad. 2008. ‘Avicenna on the Quantification of the Predicate (with an Appendix on [Ibn Zur‛a])’. In Rahman, S, Street, T. and Tahiri, H. (eds.), The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition. Berlin: Springer, 295–328.
Hasse, D. N. 2014. ‘Influence of Arabic and Islamic Philosophy on the Latin West’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2014 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/arabic-islamic-influence/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Heim, I. and Kratzer, A. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Henry, Desmond P. 1964. The De Grammatico of St. Anselm: The Theory of Paronymy. University of Notre Dame Press.
Herzenberg, Caroline L. 2008. ‘Medieval Era’. In Rosser, S. (ed.), Women, Science, and Myth. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 17–30.
Hodges, Wilfrid. 2010. ‘Ibn Sīnā on Analysis: 1. Proof Search. Or: Abstract State Machines as a Tool for History of Logic’. In Blass, A., Dershowitz, N. and Reisig, W. (eds.), Fields of Logic and Computation: Essays Dedicated to Yuri Gurevich on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6300, Berlin: Springer, 354–404.
Hodges, Wilfred. 2012. ‘Affirmative and Negative in Ibn Sīnā’. In Dutilh Novaes, C. and Hjortland, O. T. (eds.), Insolubles and Consequences: Essays in Honour of Stephen Read. London: College Publications, 119–134.
Hodges, Wilfred. 2013. (transl.). ‘Avicenna, Shifa: Qiyas ii.4’. URL http://wilfridhodges.co.uk/arabic27.pdf (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Hodges, Wilfred. 2015. ‘The Move from One to Two Quantifiers’. In Koslow, A. and Buchsbaum, A. (eds.), The Road to Universal Logic: Festschrift for 50th Birthday of Jean-Yves Béziau. Basel: Birkhäuser, I, 221–240.
Hodges, Wilfred. Forthcoming. Mathematical Background to the Logic of Ibn Sīnā. URL http://wilfridhodges.co.uk/arabic44.pdf (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M. 2003. ‘Via Antiqua and Via Moderna in the Fifteenth Century: Doctrinal, Institutional and Church Political Factors in the Wegestreit’. In Friedman, Russell L and Nielsen, Lauge O. (eds.), The Medieval Heritage in Early Modern Metaphysics and Modal Theory, 1400–1700. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 9–36.
Hoenen, Maarten J. F. M. 2011. ‘Universities and Philosophy’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 1359–1364.
Holtz, L., Baratin, M. and Colombat, B. (eds.). 2009. Priscien: Transmission et refondation de la grammaire de l'Antiquité aux Modernes. Turnhout: Brepols.
Horn, L. R. 1996. ‘Presupposition and Implicature’. In Lappin, S. (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 299–319.
Horn, L. R. 2011. ‘Only XL: The Assertoric Asymmetry of Exponibles’. In Cormany, E., Ito, S. and Lutz, D. (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 19. New York: CLC Publications, 198–222.
Huby, Pamela. 2007. Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, vol. II: Logic. Leiden: Brill.
Hugonnnard-Roche, Henri. 1992. ‘Une ancienne “édition” arabe de l'Organon d'Aristote: Problèmes de traduction et de transmission’. In Hamesse, J. (ed.), Les des textes anciens problèmes posés par l'édition critique et médiévaux. Louvain-la-Neuve: Univerdsité Catholique de Louvain, 139–157.
Hugonnnard-Roche, Henri. 2003. ‘Notices sur Aristote, La Poétique’. In Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vol. Supplément. Paris: CNRS-Éditions, 208–218.
Hugonnnard-Roche, Henri. 2004. La Logique d'Aristote du Grec au Syriaque. Paris: Vrin.
Hugonnard-Roche, Henri. 2013. ‘Un Organon court en Syriaque: Paul de Perse versus Boèce’. In Brumberg-Chaumont 2013b, 193–216.
Hugonnard-Roche, Henri and Elamrani-Jamal, A. 1989. ‘Aristote, L'Organon, tradition syriaque et arabe’. In Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Paris: CNRS-Éditions, I, 502–528.
Ierodiakonou, Katerina. 2011. ‘Logic, Byzantine’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 695–697.
Iwakuma, Yukio. 1992a. ‘“Vocales” or Early Nominalists’. Traditio 47: 37–111.Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. 1992b. ‘Twelfth-Century Nominales: The Posthumous School of Peter Abelard’. Vivarium 30: 97–109.Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. 1993. ‘The Introductiones dialecticae secundum Wilgelmum and secundum magistrum G. Paganellum’. Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 21: 43–114.Google Scholar
Iwakuma, Yukio. 2003. ‘William of Champeaux and the Introductiones’. In Braakhuis, H. A. G. and Kneepkens, C. H. (eds.), Aristotle's Peri Hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols, 1–30.
Iwakuma, Y. and Ebbesen, S. 1992. ‘Logico-Theological Schools from the Second Half of the 12th Century: A List of Sources’. Vivarium 30: 173–210.Google Scholar
Jacobi, K. 1988. ‘Logic (ii): The Later Twelfth Century’. In Dronke, P. (ed.), A History of Twelfth Century Western Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 227–251.
Jardine, Lisa. 1988. ‘Humanistic Logic’. In Schmitt, Charles B., Skinner, Quentin, Kessler, Eckhard and Kraye, Jill (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 173–198.
Johnston, Spencer. 2015. ‘A Formal Reconstruction of Buridan's Modal Syllogism’. History and Philosophy of Logic 36, 2–17.Google Scholar
Kaluza, Z. 1988. Les querelles doctrinales à Paris: Nominalistes et realistes aux confins du XIVe et XVe siecles. Bergamo: Perluigi Lubrina.
Kaluza, Z. 1995. ‘La crise des années 1474–1482: L'interdiction du nominalisme par Louis XI’. In Maarten, J. F. M., Hoenen, J. H., Schneider, Josef and Wieland, Georg (eds.), Philosophy and Learning: Universities in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill, 293–327.
Kaluza, Z. 1998. ‘Late Medieval Philosophy, 1350–1500’. In Marenbon 1998, 426–451.
Kamp, H., van Genabith, J. and Reyle, U. 2011. ‘Discourse Representation Theory’. In Gabbay, D. M. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Springer, XV, 125–394.
Kann, Christoph. 1993. ‘Materiale Supposition und die Erwähnung von Sprachzeichen’. In Lenk, H. and Poser, H. (eds.), Neue Realitäten. Herausforderung der Philosophie, proc. XVI. Deutscher Kongreß für Philosophie. TU Berlin, 231–238.
Kann, Christoph. 2006. ‘Medieval Logic as a Formal Science: A Survey’. In Löwe, B., Peckhaus, V. and Räsch, T. (eds.), Foundations of the Formal Sciences, vol. IV: The History of the Concept of the Formal Sciences. Studies in Logic 3. London: King's College Press, 103–123.
Kann, C., Loewe, B., Rode, C. and Uckelman, S. (eds.). Forthcoming. Modern Views of Medieval Logic. Leuven: Peeters.
Karimullah, Kamran. 2015. ‘Unusual Syllogisms: Avicenna and Najm al-dīn al-Kātibī on per impossibile Syllogisms and Implication (luzūm)’. Oriens 43: 223–271.Google Scholar
King, Peter. 1991. ‘Mediaeval Thought-Experiments: The Metamethodology of Mediaeval Science’. In Horowitz, T. and Massey, G. J. (eds.), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 43–64.
King, Peter. 2004. ‘Anselm's Philosophy of Language’. In Davies, Brian and Leftow, Brian (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press, 84–110.
King, Peter. 2005. ‘William of Ockham: Summa Logicae’. In Shand, John (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy, vol. 1: Ancient and Medieval. Chesham: Acumen, 343–374.
Klima, G. 2001a. ‘Introduction’. In Buridan 2001, xxvii–lxii.
Klima, G. 2001b. ‘Existence and Reference in Medieval Logic’. In Hieke, A. and Morscher, E. (eds.), New Essays in Free Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 197–226.
Klima, G. 2004a. ‘John Buridan and the Force-Content Distinction’. In Maierú, A. and Valente, L. (eds.), Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-Assertive Language: Acts of the Fourteenth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics. Rome: Olschi, 415–427.
Klima, G. 2004b. ‘Consequences of a Closed, Token-Based Semantics: The Case of John Buridan’. History and Philosophy of Logic 25: 95–110.Google Scholar
Klima, G. 2005. ‘Nominalism’. In Brown, K. (ed.), Elsevier's Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, VIII, 648–652.
Klima, G. 2006. ‘Syncategoremata’. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, second edition. Oxford: Elsevier, XII, 353–356.
Klima, G. 2009. John Buridan. Oxford University Press.
Klima, G. and Sandu, G. 1990. ‘Numerical Quantifiers in Game-Theoretical Semantics’. Theoria 56: 173–192.Google Scholar
Kluge, E. 1973–1974. ‘William of Ockham's Commentary on Porphyry: Introduction and English Translation’. Franciscan Studies 33: 171–254 and 34: 306–382.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, C. H. 1993. ‘Orleáns 266 and the Sophismata Collection: Master Joscelin of Soissons and the Infinite Words in the Early Twelfth Century’. In Read, S. (ed.), Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 64–85.
Kneepkens, Corneille H. 2003. ‘Nam Defecatum Vas Quandoque Servat Amatum. Elementary Aids-to-Study: An Unconventional Access to Late-Medieval University Philosophy’. Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 45: 105–129.Google Scholar
Kneepkens, Corneille H. 2004. ‘The “Via Antiqua” and the “Via Moderna” in Grammar: The Late Medieval Discussion on the Subject of the Sentence’. In Maierù, A. and Valente, L. (eds.), Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-assertive Language. Florence: Olschki, 219–244.
Kneepkens, Corneille H. and Braakhuis, H. A. G. (eds.). 2003. Aristotle's Peri hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Turnhout: Brepols.
Knuuttila, S. 1993. Modalities in Medieval Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Knuuttila, S. 1997. ‘Positio Impossibilis in Medieval Discussion of the Trinity’. In Marmo, C. (ed.), Vestigia, Imagines, Verba: Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts (XIIth–XIVth Century). Turnhout: Brepols, 277–288.
Knuuttila, S. 2010. ‘Medieval Commentators on Future Contingents in De Interpretatione 9’. Vivarium 48: 75–95.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. 2011a. ‘Trinitarian Logic’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 1335–1337.
Knuuttila, S. 2011b. ‘Interpreting Medieval Logic and in Medieval Logic’. In Cameron, Margaret and Marenbon, John (eds.), Methods and Methodologies: Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500–1500. Leiden: Brill, 149–160.
Knuuttila, S. 2015. ‘Medieval Theories of Modality’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2015 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/modality-medieval/ (last accessed 30 April 2016.
Knysh, G. D. 1986. ‘Biographical Reflections on Ockham’. Franciscan Studies 46: 61–91.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. 1970. ‘Medieval Logicians on the Meaning of the Propositio’. The Journal of Philosophy 67: 767–787.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. 1982. ‘Syncategoremata, Exponibilia, Sophismata’. In Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony and Pinborg, Jan (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 211–245.
Kreztmann, N. and Stump, E. 1985. ‘The Anonymous De arte obligatoria in Merton College M.S. 306’. In Bos, E. P. (ed.), Medieval Semantics and Metaphysics. Aristarium Supplementa II. Nijmegen: Ingenium, 239–280.
Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (eds.). 1982. Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Lafleur, C. (ed.). 1997. L'enseignement de la philosophie au XIIIe siècle: Autour du ‘Guide de l'étudiant’ du ms. Ripoll 109. Turnhout: Brepols.
Lagerlund, H. 2000. Modal Syllogistics in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill.
Lagerlund, H. 2008. ‘Assimilation of Aristotelian and Arabic Logic up to the Later Thirteenth Century’. In Woods, J and Gabbay, D (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 2: Medieval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 281–346.
Lagerlund, H. 2009. ‘Avicenna and Tusi on Modal Logic’. History and Philosophy of Logic 30(3): 227–239.Google Scholar
Lagerlund, H. and Olsson, E. J. 2001. ‘Disputation and Change of Belief: Burley's Theory of Obligationes as a Theory of Belief Revision’. In Yrjönsuuri, M. (ed.), Medieval Formal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 35–62.
Lameer, Joep. 1994. Al-Farabi and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice. Leiden: Brill.
Lawrence, C. H. 1984. ‘The University in State and Church’. In Catto, J. I. and Evans, R (eds.), The History of the University of Oxford, vol. I: The Early Oxford Schools. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 97–150.
Leader, D. R. 1989. A History of the University of Cambridge, vol. I: The University to 1546. Cambridge University Press.
Leff, G. 1968. Paris and Oxford Universities in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries: An Institutional and Intellectual History. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Lenz, M. 2003. Mentale Sätze. Wilhelm von Ockhams These zur Sprachlichkeit des Denkens. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Lenz, M. Forthcoming. ‘Between Things and Propositions. The Realism of Walter Burley and Walter Chatton’. In Cesalli, L. and Marenbon, J. (eds.), Facts and States of Affairs. Turnhout: Brepols.
Lewis, D. 1979. ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’. The Philosophical Review 88(4): 513–543.Google Scholar
Lewry, P. Osmund. 1978. Robert Kilwardby's Writings on the Logica Vetus, Studied with Regard to Their Teaching and Method. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
Lewry, P. Osmund. 1981a. ‘Robert Kilwardby on Meaning: A Parisian Course on the Logica Vetus’. In Beckmann, J. P., Honnefelder, L. and Jüssen, G. (eds.), Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalters. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 376–384.
Lewry, P. Osmund. 1981b. ‘The Oxford Condemnations of 1277 in Grammar and Logic’. In Braakhuis, H. A. G., Kneepkens, C. H. and Rijk, L. M. de (eds.), English Logic and Semantics from the End of the Twelfth Century to the Time of Ockham and Burley. Nijmegen: Ingenium, 235–278.
Lewry, P. Osmund. 1981c. ‘Boethian Logic in the Medieval West’. In Gibson, Margaret (ed.), Boethius: His Life, Thought and Influence. Oxford: Blackwell, 90–134.
Libera, Alain de. 1982. ‘The Oxford and Paris Traditions in Logic’. In Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., Pinborg, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 174–187.
Libera, Alain de. 1996. La querelle des universaux. De Platon à la fin du Moyen Age. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Libera, Alain de. 2002. La référence vide. Théories de la proposition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Lohr, C. 1974. ‘Supplementary Authors’. Traditio 30: 119–144.Google Scholar
Lohr, C. 2010. Latin Aristotle Commentaries, vol. I.1: Medieval Authors A–L; vol. I.2: Medieval Authors M–Z. Florence: SISMEL Edizioni di Galluzo.
Lorenz, Sonke. 1996. ‘Thomas Manlefelt (Maulefelt). Zu Leben und Werk’. In Kintzinger, M., Lorenz, S. and Walter, M. (eds.), Schule und Schüler im Mittelalter. Vienna: Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, XLII, 145–164.
Loux, Michael. 2011. Ockham's Theory of Terms: Part 1 of the Summa Logicae. Notre Dame, IN: St. Augustine's Press.
Luthala, Anneli. 2005. Grammar and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lyons, M. C. 1982. Aristotle's Ars Rhetorica. A New Edition with Commentary and Glossary. Cambridge University Press.
Mack, Peter. 1993. Renaissance Argument: Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialectic. Leiden: Brill.
Madkour, Ibrahim. 1969. L'Organon d'Aristote dans le monde arabe, second edition. Paris: Vrin.
Magee, John. 1998. Anicii Manlii Severini Boethii De Divisone Liber, Critical Edition, Translation, Prolegomena and Commentary. Leiden: Brill.
Maierù, A. 1972. Terminologia logica della tarda scolastica. Rome: Edizione del'Ateneo.
Maierù, A. 1993. ‘The Sophism “Omnis propositio est vera vel falsa” by Henry Hopton (Pseudo-Heytesbury's De veritate et falsitate propositionis)’. In Read, S. (ed.), Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel, 103–115.
Maierù, A. and Valente, L. (eds.). 2004. Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non Assertive Language. Florence: Olschki.
Makdisi, George. 1981. The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West. Edinburgh University Press.
Malink, M. 2013. Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mallet, D. 1994. ‘Le Kitāb al-Taḥlīl d'Alfarabi’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4: 317–336.Google Scholar
Maloney, T. S. 2009. ‘Who Is the Author of the Summa Lamberti?International Philosophical Quarterly 49: 89–106.Google Scholar
Mandonnet, P. F. 1908–1911. Siger de Brabant et l'averroïsme latin au XIIIme siècle. Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie de l'Université.
Manekin, Charles H. 2011. ‘Logic, Jewish’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 697–702.
Marenbon, John. 1981. From the Circle of Alcuin to the School of Auxerre: Logic, Theology and Philosophy in the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.
Marenbon, John. 1997. The Philosophy of Peter Abelard. Cambridge University Press.
Marenbon, John. (ed.). 1998. Medieval Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Marenbon, John. 2000a. Aristotelian Logic, Platonism and the Context of Early Medieval Philosophy in the West. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Marenbon, John. 2000b. ‘Medieval Latin Commentaries and Glosses on Aristotelian Logical Texts, before c. 1150 AD'. In Marenbon 2000a, item II.
Marenbon, John. 2000c. ‘Alcuin, the Council of Frankfort and the Beginnings of Medieval Philosophy’. In Marenbon 2000a, item IV.
Marenbon, John. (ed.). 2007a. ‘The Many Roots of Medieval Logic: The Aristotelian and the Non-Aristotelian Traditions’. Vivarium 45 (special issue).Google Scholar
Marenbon, John. 2007b. Medieval Philosophy. An Historical and Philosophical Introduction, NY: Routledge, 2007.
Marenbon, John. 2008. ‘The Latin Tradition of Logic to 1100’. In Gabbay, Dov M. and Woods, John (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 2: Medieval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1–81.
Marenbon, John. 2011. ‘Logic at the Turn of the Twelfth Century: A Synthesis’. In Rosier-Catach, Irène (ed.), Arts du langage et théologie aux confines des XIe–XIIe siècles. Turnhout: Brepols, 181–217.
Marenbon, John. (ed.). 2013. ‘La logique en Occident Latin’. In Brumberg-Chaumont 2013b, 173–192.
Marenbon, John. 2014. ‘Boethius's Unparadigmatic Originality and Its Implications for Medieval Philosophy’. In Boehm, T., Juergasch, T. and Kirchner, A. (eds.), Boethius as a Paradigm of Late Ancient Thought. Berlin: De Gruyter, 231–244.
Markowski, M. 1984. ‘L'influence de Jean Buridan sur les universités d'Europe Centrale’. In Kaluza, Zénon and Vignaux, Paul (eds.), Preuve et raisons à l'université de Paris: Logique, ontologie et théologie au XIVe siècle. Paris: Vrin, 149–163.
Markowski, M. 1993. ‘Die Rolle der Sophismata im unterricht der Krakauer Universität im 15. Jahrhundert’. In Read, S. (ed.), Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 116–127.
Marmo, C. 1989. ‘Ontology and Semantics in the Logic of Duns Scotus’. In Eco, U. and Marmo, C. (eds.), On the Medieval Theory of Signs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–193.
Marmo, C. 1990. ‘Suspicio: A Key Word to the Significance of Aristotle's Rhetoric in Thirteenth Century Scholasticism’. Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 60: 145–198.Google Scholar
Maróth, M. 1989. Ibn Sīnā und die peripatetische ‘Aussagenlogik’. Leiden: Brill.
Martens, D. B. 2010. ‘William Heytesbury and the Conditions for Knowledge’. Theoria 76(4): 355–374.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J. 1987. ‘Embarassing Arguments and Surprising Conclusions in the Development of Theories of the Conditional in the Twelfth Century’. In Jolivet, Jean and Libera, Alain de (eds.), Gilbert de Poitiers et ses contemporains aux origins de la logica modernorum. Naples: Bibliopolis, 377–401.
Martin, Christopher J. 1991. ‘The Logic of Negation in Boethius’. Phronesis 36: 277–304.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J. 2001. ‘Obligations and Liars’. In Yrjönsuuri, M. (ed.), Medieval Formal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 63–94.
Martin, Christopher J. 2004. ‘Logic’. In Brower, Jeffrey E. and Guilfoy, Kevin (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Abelard. Cambridge University Press, 158–199.
Martin, Christopher J. 2009. ‘The Development of Logic in the Twelfth Century’. In Pasnau, R. (ed.), Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 129–146.
Martin, Christopher J. 2010. ‘“They had added not a single tiny proposition”: The Reception of the Prior Analytics in the First Half of the Twelfth Century’. Vivarium 48, 159–192.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher J. 2012. ‘Logical Consequence’. In Marenbon, John (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 289–311.
Martin, Christopher J. 2013. ‘Instantiae and the Parisian Schools’. In Fink, J. L., Hansen, H. and Mora-Márquez, A. M. (eds.), Logic and Language in the Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill, 65–84.
Mates, B. 1961. Stoic Logic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Meier-Oeser, Stephan. 1995. ‘Signifikation’. In Ritter, J. and Gründer, K. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Basel: Schwabe, IX, 759–795.
Meier-Oeser, Stephan. 1997. Die Spur des Zeichens: Das Zeichen und seine Funktion in der Philosophie des Mittelalters und der Frühen Neuzeit. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Meier-Oeser, Stephan. 2013. ‘The Hermeneutical Rehabilitation of Supposition Theory in Seventeenth-Century Protestant Logic’. Vivarium 51: 464–481.Google Scholar
Miller, L. B. 1984. Islamic Disputation Theory: A Study of the Development of Dialectic in Islam from the Tenth through the Fourteenth Centuries. PhD dissertation, Princeton University.
Miller, L. B. 1985. ‘A Brief History of the Liar Paradox’. In Link-Salinger, R. (ed.), Of Scholars, Savants, and Their Texts. New York: Peter Lang, 173–182.
Mitchell, O. 1983. ‘On a New Algebra of Logic’. In Peirce, C. S. (ed.), Studies in Logic. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company, 72–106.
Monnoyer, J.-M. (ed.). 2007. Metaphysics and Truthmakers. Heusenstamm: Ontos.
Montague, R. 1974. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers by Richard Montague. Thomason, R. H. (ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Moody, Ernest A. 1967. ‘Logic, History of: Medieval Logic’. In Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Macmillan, IV, 528–534.
Mora-Márquez, A. M. 2014. ‘Martinus Dacus and Boethius Dacus on the Signification of Terms and the Truth-Value of Assertions’. Vivarium 52: 23–48.Google Scholar
Morscher, E. 1972. ‘Von Bolzano zu Meinong: zur Geschichte des logischen Realismus’. In Haller, R. (ed.), Jenseits vom Sein und Nichtsein. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlaganstalt, 69–97.
Morscher, E. 1990. ‘Judgment Contents’. In Mulligan, K. (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics: The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 181–196.
Movahed, Z. 2003. ‘Ibn-Sina's Anticipation of the Formulas of Buridan and Barcan’. In Enayat, A., Kalantari, I. and Moniri, M. (eds.), Logic in Tehran. Wellesley, MA: A. K. Peters, 248–255.
Movahed, Z. 2010. ‘De re and de dicto Modality in Islamic Traditional Logic’. Sophia Perennis, 2: 5–14.Google Scholar
Müller, I. von. 1897. Über Galens Werk von wissenschaftlichen Beweis. Abhandlungen der königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philos.-philol. 20, 2. Munich.
Mulligan, K. 1989. ‘Husserl on States of Affairs’. Epistemologia 12: 207–234.Google Scholar
Mulligan, K., Simons, P. and Smith, B. 1984. ‘Truth-Makers’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44: 287–321.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. E. 1991. ‘Pierre Duhem and the History of Late Medieval Science and Philosophy in the Latin West’, in Imbach, R. and Maierù, A. (eds.), Gli studi di filosofia medievale fra otto e novecento. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.
Muskens, R. 1995. Meaning and Partiality. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Nauta, Lodi. 2007. ‘Lorenzo Valla and the Rise of Humanist Dialectic’. In Hankins, James (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 193–210.
Newton, Lloyd A. (ed.). 2008. Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories. Leiden: Brill.
Normore, Calvin. 1987. ‘The Tradition of Medieval Nominalism’. In Wippel, J. (ed.), Studies in Medieval Philosophy. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 17. Washington, DC: CUA Press, 201–217.
Normore, Calvin. 1999. ‘Some Aspects of Ockham's Logic’. In Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Cambridge University Press, 31–52.
Nortmann, U. 1996. Modale Syllogismen, mogliche Welten, Essentialismus: Eine Analyse der aristotelischen Modallogik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Novikoff, Alex J. 2013. The Medieval Culture of Disputation: Pedagogy, Practice, and Performance. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Nuchelmans, G. 1973. Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ottoson, Pen-Gunnar. 1984. Scholastic Medicine and Philosophy. Naples: Biblipolis.
Panaccio, Claude. 1999. Le discours intérieur. De Platon à Guillaume d'Ockham. Paris: Seuil.
Panaccio, Claude. 2004. Ockham on Concepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Panaccio, Claude. 2013. ‘Ockham and Buridan on Simple Supposition’. Vivarium 51: 371–384.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 2008. ‘The Development of Supposition Theory in the Later 12th through 14th Centuries’. In Gabbay, D. M. and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook on the History of Logic, vol. 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 157–280.
Parsons, Terence. 2014. Articulating Medieval Logic. Oxford University Press.
Parsons, Terence. 2015. ‘The Traditional Square of Opposition’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2015 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/square/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Pasnau, R. 1995. ‘William Heytesbury on Knowedge: Epistemology without Necessary and Sufficient Conditions’. History of Philosophy Quarterly 12(4): 347–366.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. (ed.). 2010. The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, two volumes. Cambridge University Press.
Patterson, R. 1995. Aristotle's Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon. Cambridge University Press.
Pérez-Ilzarbe, P. 1999. El significado de las proposiciones: Jerónimo Pardo († 1502) y las teorías medievales de la proposición. Pamplona: Ediciones universidad de Navarra.
Pérez-Ilzarbe, P. 2011. ‘Disputation and Logic in the Medieval Treatises “De Modo Opponendi et Respondendi”’. Vivarium 49: 127–149.Google Scholar
Perini-Santos, E. Forthcoming. ‘Explaining Away complexe significabilia: The Arguments of John Buridan’. In Cesalli, L. and Marenbon, J. (eds.), Facts and States of Affairs. Turnhout: Brepols.
Perler, D. 1992. Der propositionale Wahrheitsbegriff. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Perler, D. 1993. ‘Duns Scotus on Signification’. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 3: 97–120.Google Scholar
Perler, D. 1994. ‘Late Medieval Ontologies of Facts’. The Monist 77: 149–169.Google Scholar
Peters, F. E. 1968. Aristoteles Arabus: The Oriental Translations and Commentaries on the Aristotelian Corpus. Leiden: Brill.
Pinborg, J. 1967. Die Entwicklung de Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters: Texte und Untersuchungen 42/2. Münster: Aschendorff.
Pinborg, J. 1982. ‘Speculative Grammar’. In Kretzmann et al. 1982, 254–270.
Pini, G. 1999. ‘Species, Concept and Thing: Theories of Signification in the Second Half of the Thirteenth Century’. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8: 21–52.
Pini, G. 2001. ‘Signification of Names in Scotus and Some of His Contemporaries’. Vivarium 39: 20–51.Google Scholar
Pini, G. 2002. Categories and Logic in Duns Scotus: An Interpretation of Aristotle's Categories in the Late Thirteenth Century. Leiden: Brill.
Pironet, Fabienne. 1993. ‘The Sophismata Asinina of William Heytesbury’. In Read, S. (ed.), Sophisms and Medieval Logic and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 128–143.
Pironet, Fabienne. 1995. ‘Logique et droit au XIVe siècle’. In Bazán, C., Andujar, E. and Sbrocchi, L. (eds.), Les philosophies morales et politiques au Moyen Age, Proc. Ninth International Congress in Medieval Philosophy. New York, I, 548–554.
Pironet, Fabienne and Spruyt, Joke. 2015. ‘Sophismata’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2015 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/sophismata/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Pourjavady, Reza. 2011. Philosophy in Early Safavid Iran: Najm al-Dîn Mahmûd al-Nayrîzî and His Writings. Leiden: Brill.
Pozzi, Lorenzo. 1990. La Coerenza logica nelle Teoria Medioevale delle Obbligazioni: con l'edizione del trattato ‘Obligationes’. Parma: Edizioni Zara.
Qaramaleki, Ahad Faramarz (ed.). 2007. Davāzdah risālah dar pārādūks-i durūghgū. Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy.
Quine, W. 1956. ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’. Journal of Philosophy 53: 177–187.Google Scholar
Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T. and Genot, E. (eds.). 2008. Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science 8. Berlin: Springer.
Read, Stephen. 1991a. ‘Descensus copulatim: Albert of Saxony vs. Thomas Maulfelt’. In Biard, J. (ed.), Itineraires d'Albert de Saxe: Paris-Vienne au XIVe. Paris: Vrin, 71–85.
Read, Stephen. 1991b. ‘Thomas of Cleves and Collective Supposition’. Vivarium 29: 50–84.Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. (ed.). 1993. Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Read, Stephen. 1994. ‘Formal and Material Consequence’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 23: 247–265.Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. 2001. ‘Self-Reference and Validity Revisited’. In Yrjönsuuri, M. (ed.), Medieval Formal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 183–196.
Read, Stephen. 2007. ‘William Ockham's The Sum of Logic’. Topoi 26: 271–277.Google Scholar
Read, Stephen. 2012. ‘John Buridan's Theory of Consequence and His Octagons of Opposition’. In Beziau, J.-Y. and Jacquette, D. (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Basel: Birkhäuser, 93–110.
Read, Stephen. 2015. ‘Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2015 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/medieval-terms/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Read, Stephen. Forthcoming. ‘Robert Fland or Elandus Dialecticus?’.
Reicher, M. E. 2009. States of Affairs. Heusenstamm: Ontos.
Reisman, David C. 2013. ‘The Life and Times of Avicenna: Patronage and Learning in Medieval Islam’. In Adamson, P. (ed.), Interpreting Avicenna: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press, 7–27.
Rescher, Nicholas. 1964. The Development of Arabic Logic. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Risse, Wilhelm. 1965. Bibliographia Logica I: 1472–1800. Hildesheim: Olms.
Rode, C. Forthcoming. ‘States of Affairs as Mind-dependent and Intra-mental Complex Objects’. In Cesalli, L. and Marenbon, J. (eds.), Facts and States of Affairs. Turnhout: Brepols.
Rosenberg, S. and Manekin, C. 1988. ‘Themistius on Modal Logic: Excerpts from a Commentary on the Prior Analytics Attributed to Themistius’. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 11: 83–103.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. 1958. The Muqaddima of Ibn Khaldun. New York: Pantheon Books.
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 1983. La grammaire spéculative des modistes. Lille: Presses Universitaires.
Rosier-Catach, Irène. (ed.). 2003a. ‘Les syncatégorème’. Histoire epistémologie langage 25(II), (special issue).Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 2003b. ‘Abélard et les grammairiens: sur le verbe substantif et la prédication’. Vivarium 41(2): 175–248.Google Scholar
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 2009. ‘Sur le verbe substantif, la prédication et la consignification – Peri Hermeneias 16b20–25 dans les traductions et commentaires en latin’. In Husson, Suzanne (ed.), Interpréter le De interpretatione. Paris: Vrin, 97–131.
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 2010. ‘Grammar’. In Pasnau, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 197–207.
Rosier-Catach, Irène. 2012. ‘“Vox” and “Oratio” in Early Twelfth Century Grammar and Dialectic’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 78: 47–129.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 2008. The Problems of Philosophy. Rockwell, MD: Arc Manor.
Rutten, Pepijn. 2005. ‘“Secundum processum et mentem Versoris”: John Versor and His Relation to the Schools of Thought Reconsidered’. Vivarium 43: 292–336.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I. 1965. ‘A Twelfth-century Defence of the Fourth-figure of the Syllogism’. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 28: 14–28.Google Scholar
Sabra, A. I. 1980. ‘Avicenna on the Subject Matter of Logic’. Journal of Philosophy 77: 746–764.Google Scholar
Schmutz, J. 2011. ‘Verifactivum’. In Atucha, I., Calma, D., König-Pralong, C. and Zavattero, I. (eds.), Mots médiévaux offerts à Ruedi Imbach. Porto: FIDEM, 739–748.Google Scholar
Schöck, Cornelia. 2005. Koranexegese, Grammatik Und Logik: Zum Verhältnis von Arabischer Und Aristotelischer Urteils-, Konsequenz- Und Schlußlehre. Leiden: Brill.
Scott, Theodore K. 1966. John Buridan: Sophisms on Meaning and Truth. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sharpe, Johannes. 1990. Quaestio super Universalia. Conti, A. D. (ed.). Florence: Olschki.
Shiel, James. 1958. ‘Boethius’ Commentaries on Aristotle’. Medieval and Renaissance Studies 4: 217–244.Google Scholar
Shiel, James. 1990. ‘Boethius’ Commentaries on Aristotle’. In Sorabji 1990, 349–372.
Silva, J. F. 2011. ‘Kilwardby’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 1148–1153.
Smiley, T. J. 1973. ‘What Is a Syllogism?Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 136–154.Google Scholar
Smith, B. 1989. ‘Logic and the Sachverhalt’. The Monist 72: 52–69.Google Scholar
Smith, Robin. 1989. Aristotle, Prior Analytics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Sorabji, Richard (ed.). 1990. Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Sorabji, Richard 2004. The Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600AD: A Sourcebook, vol. 3: Logic and Metaphysics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Spade, P.V. (trans.). 1974. Ockham's Theory of Terms: Part II of the Summa Logicae. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine's Press.
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1977. ‘Roger Swyneshed's Obligationes: Edition and Comments’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 44: 243–285.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1978. ‘Richard Lavenham's Obligationes: Edition and Comments’. Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 33: 225–242.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1979. ‘Roger Swyneshed's Insolubilia: Edition and Comments’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 46: 177–220.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1980a. ‘Robert Fland's Obligationes: An Edition’. Medieval Studies 42: 41–60.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1980b. Peter of Ailly: Concepts and Insolubles. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1982a. ‘The Semantics of Terms’. In Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 188–196.
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1982b. ‘Obligations: Developments in the Fourteenth Century’. In Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., and Pinborg, J. (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 335–341.
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1982c. ‘Three Theories of Obligationes: Burley, Kilvington, and Swyneshed on Counterfactual Reasoning’. History and Philosophy of Logic 3: 1–32.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1988. ‘The Logic of the Categorical: The Medieval Theory of Descent and Ascent’. In Kretzmann, N. (ed.), Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 187–224.
Spade, Paul Vincent. 1994. Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Spade, Paul Vincent. 2007. Thoughts, Words and Things: An Introduction to Late Medieval Logic and Semantic Theory. URL http://pvspade.com/ Logic/docs/Thoughts,%20Words%20and%20Things1_2.pdf (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Spade, Paul Vincent. 2000. ‘Why Don't Medieval Logicians Ever Tell Us What They're Doing? Or, What Is This, a Conspiracy?’ URL http://pvspade.com/Logic/docs/Conspiracy.pdf (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Spade, Paul Vincent and Menn, Stephen. 2003. ‘A Note on the Title of Walter Burley's On the Purity of the Art of Logic’. URL http://pvspade.com/Logic/docs/BurlNote.pdf (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Spade, Paul Vincent and and Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. 2014. ‘Medieval Theories of Obligationes’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2014 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/obligationes/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Speca, Anthony. 2001. Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic. Leiden: Brill.
Spruit, L. 1994. Species intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge. Leiden: Brill.
Spruyt, J. 2011. ‘Syncategoremata’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 1241–1245.
Spruyt, J. 2012. ‘Peter of Spain’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 1257–1261.
Strawson, P. 1950. ‘On Referring’. Mind 59: 320–344.Google Scholar
Street, T. 2002. ‘An Outline of Avicenna's Syllogistic’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84: 129–160.Google Scholar
Street, T. 2004. ‘Arabic Logic’. In Gabbay, D. M. and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 523–596.
Street, T. 2005a. ‘Fakhraddīn ar-Rāzī's Critique of Avicennan Logic’. In Perler, D. and Rudolph, U. (eds.), Logik und Theologie. Das ‘Organon’ im arabischen und im lateinischen Mittelalter. Leiden: Brill, 99–116.
Street, T. 2005b. ‘Logic’. In Adamson, P. and Taylor, R. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 247–265.
Street, T. 2010a. ‘Avicenna's Twenty Questions on Logic: Preliminary Notes for Further Work’. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 21: 97–112.Google Scholar
Street, T. 2010b. ‘Appendix: Readings of the Subject Term’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 20: 119–124.Google Scholar
Street, T. 2012. ‘Medieval and Modern Interpretations of Avicenna's Modal Syllogistic’. In Opwis, F. and Reisman, D. (eds.), Islamic Philosophy, Science, Culture, and Religion: Essays in Honor of Dimitri Gutas. Leiden: Brill, 232–256.
Street, T. 2014. ‘Afḍal al-Dīn al-Khūnajī (d. 1248) on the Conversion of Modal Propositions’. Oriens 42: 454–513.Google Scholar
Street, T. 2015. ‘Arabic and Islamic Philosophy of Language and Logic’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2015 edition. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/arabic-islamic-language/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Street, T. Forthcoming a. ‘Avicenna: Logic’. In Rudolph, Ulrich (ed.), Grundriss Der Geschichte Der Philosophie. Philosophie in Der Islamischen Welt, Basel: Schwabe.
Street, T. Forthcoming b. ‘Maragha Logic’.
Street, T. Forthcoming c. ‘Kātibī, Taḥtānī and the Shamsiyya’. In El-Rouayheb, Kh. and Schmidtke, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Streveler, P. 1993. ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Treatment of Sophisms in MSS Digby 2 and Royal 12 of the Magister Abstractionem’. In Read, S. (ed.), Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 144–184.
Strobino, Riccardo. 2009. Concedere, negare, dubitare: Peter of Mantua's treatise on obligations. PhD dissertation, Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa.
Strobino, Riccardo. 2015Time and Necessity in Avicenna's Theory of Demonstration’. Oriens 43: 338–367.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. 1982. ‘Obligations: From the Beginning to the Early Fourteenth Century’. In Kretzman, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 315–334.
Stump, Eleonore. 1985. ‘The Logic of Disputation in Walter Burley's Treatise on Obligationes’. Synthese 63: 355–374.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. 1989. Dialectic and Its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Sylla, Edith. 1982. ‘The Oxford Calculators’. In Kretzmann et al. 1982, 540–563.
Sylla, Edith. 2010. ‘The Oxford Calculators’ Middle Degree Theorem in Context’. Early Science and Medicine 15: 338–370.Google Scholar
Tabarroni, A. 1993. ‘“Omnis phoenix est”: Quantification and Existence in a New Sophismata-Collection’ (MS Clm 14522). In Read, S., Sophisms in Medieval Logic and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 185–201.
Tachau, Katherine. 1987. ‘Wodeham, Crathorn and Holcot: The Development of the complexe significabile’. In Rijk, L. M. De and Braakhuis, H. A. G. (eds.), Logos and Pragma. Nijmegen: Ingenium, 161–187.
Tachau, Katherine. 1988. Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology, and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250–1345. Leiden: Brill.
Tarski, A. 1983. ‘On the Concept of Logical Consequence’. In Tarski, A., Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, second edition. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 409–420.
Textor, M. 1996. Bolzano's Propositionalismus. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Thom, Paul. 1996. The Logic of Essentialism: An Interpretation of Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic. Synthese Historical Library 43. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Thom, Paul. 2003. Medieval Modal Systems. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Thom, Paul. 2007. Logic and Ontology in the Syllogistic of Robert Kilwardby. Leiden: Brill.
Thom, Paul. 2008. ‘Logic and Metaphysics in Avicenna's Modal Syllogistic’. In Rahman, S., Street, T. and Tahiri, H. (eds.), The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition. Berlin: Springer, 362–376.
Thom, Paul. 2010. ‘Abharī on the Logic of Conjunctive Terms’. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 20(1): 105–117.Google Scholar
Thom, Paul. 2011. ‘On Formalizing the Logics of the Past’. In Cameron, Margaret and Marenbon, John (eds.), Methods and Methodologies: Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500–1500. Leiden: Brill, 191–206.
Thom, Paul. 2012a. ‘Logical Form’. In Marenbon, J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 271–288.
Thom, Paul. 2012b. ‘Syllogisms about Possibility and Necessity in Avicenna and Ṭūsī’. In Dutilh Novaes, C. and Hjortland, O. (eds.), Insolubles and Consequences: Essays in Honour of Stephen Read. Milton Keynes: College Publications, 239–248.
Thom, Paul. 2013. ‘Robert Kilwardby on Syllogistic Form’. In Lagerlund, H and Thom, P (eds.), The Philosophy of Robert Kilwardby. Leiden: Brill, 131–162.
Thom, Paul. 2016. ‘Necessity in Avicenna and the Arabic Tradition’. In Cresswell, M. (ed.), The Logic of Modalities from Aristotle to Carnap: The Story of Necessity. Cambridge University Press.
Thomsen Thörnqvist, Cristina. 2013. ‘The “Anonymus Aurelianensis III” and Robert Kilwardby on the Prior Analytics’. In Fink, J. L., Hansen, H. and Mora-Márquez, A. M. (eds.), Logic and Language in the Middle Ages, Leiden: Brill, 185–198.
Thomsen Thörnqvist, Cristina. (ed.). 2014. ‘Anonymus Aurelianensis III’ in Aristotelis Analytica priora: Critical Edition, Introduction, Notes and Indexes. Leiden: Brill.
Thomsen Thörnqvist, Cristina. Forthcoming. ‘Bridging the Beginner's Gap: Apuleius, Boethius, and Porphyry on the Categorical Syllogism’. In Bydén, Börje and Thörnqvist, Christina Thomsen (eds.), The Aristotelian Tradition: The Reception of Aristotle's Works on Logic and Metaphysics in the Middle Ages.
Tkatsch, Jaroslaus. 1928–1932. Die Arabische Übersetzung der Poetik des Aristoteles und die Grundlage der Kritik griechischen Textes, two volumes. Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky.
Tweedale, Martin. 1976. Abailard on Universals. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Tweedale, Martin. 1988. ‘Logic (i): From the Late Eleventh Century to the Time of Abelard’. In Dronke, Peter (ed.), A History of Twelfth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 196–226.
Uckelman, Sara L. 2010. ‘Logic and the Condemnations of 1277’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39: 201–227.Google Scholar
Uckelman, Sara L. 2011a. ‘A Dynamic Epistemic Logic Approach to Modeling Obligationes’. In Grossi, D., Minica, S., Rodenhäuser, B. and Smets, S. (eds.), LIRa Yearbook. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language & Computation, 147–172.
Uckelman, Sara L. 2011b. ‘Deceit and Indefeasible Knowledge: The Case of Dubitatio’. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 21(3/4): 503–519.Google Scholar
Uckelman, Sara L. 2012. ‘The Reception of St. Anselm's Logic in the 20th and 21st Centuries’. In Gasper, G and Logan, I. (eds.), Saint Anselm of Canterbury and His Legacy. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 405–426.
Uckelman, Sara L. 2013. ‘Medieval Disputationes de obligationibus as Formal Dialogue Systems’. Argumentation 27(2): 143–166.Google Scholar
Uckelman, Sara L. 2015. ‘Sit Verum and Counterfactual Reasoning’. Vivarium 53: 90–113.Google Scholar
Uckelman, S. L., Maat, J. and Katherina, R. Forthcoming. ‘The Art of Doubting in Obligationes Parisienses’. In Kann, C., Löwe, B., Rode, C. and Uckelman, S. L. (eds.), Modern Views of Medieval Logic. Leuven: Peeters.
Van der Helm, Alfred. 2014. Thomas Manlevelt, ‘Questiones Libri Porphirii’. Leiden: Brill.
Van der Lecq, Ria. 2011. ‘Modistae’. In Lagerlund, H. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 806–808.
Van Rijen, J. 1989. Aspects of Aristotle's Logic of Modalities. Synthese Historical Library 35. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Versteegh, Kees. 1997. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought III: The Arabic Linguistic Tradition. London: Routledge.
Vittorini, Marta. 2013. ‘Life and Works’. In Conti 2013a, 17–45.
Walzer, R. 1962. Greek into Arabic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wei, Ian. 2012. Intellectual Culture in Medieval Paris: Theologians and the University, c.1100–1330. Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Weidemann, Hermann. 1979. ‘Wilhelm von Ockhams Suppositionstheorie und die moderne Quantorenlogik’. Vivarium 17(1): 43–60.Google Scholar
Weijers, O. 1994. ‘L'enseignement du trivium à la Faculté des arts de Paris: la quaestio’. In Hamesse, J. (ed.), Manuels, programmes de cours et techniques d'enseignement dans les universités médiévales. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain, 54–74.
Westerståhl, D. 1985. ‘Logical Constants in Quantifier Languages’. Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 387–413.Google Scholar
Wilks, Ian. 2008. ‘The Logical Theory of Peter Abelard and His Contemporaries’. In Gabbay, D. and Woods, J. (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 2: Medieval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 83–156.
Wippel, J. 1987. ‘Thomas Aquinas's Derivation of the Aristotelian Categories (Predicaments)’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 25(1): 13–34.Google Scholar
Wisnovsky, Rob. 2004. ‘The Nature and Scope of Arabic Philosophical Commentary in Post-classical (ca. 1100–1900 AD) Islamic Intellectual History: Some Preliminary Observations’. In Adamson, P., Baltussen, H. and Stone, M. W. F. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. London: Institute for Advanced Studies, 149–191.
Witt, C. and Shapiro, L. 2015. ‘Feminist History of Philosophy’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-femhist/ (last accessed 30 April 2016).
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. 1993. ‘Aristotle's Topics and Medieval Obligational Disputations’. Synthese 96: 59–82.Google Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. 2000. ‘The Trinity and Positio Impossibilis: Some Remarks on Inconsistence’. In Halström, G. and Hintikka, J. (eds.), Medieval Philosophy and Modern Times. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 59–68.
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko. 2001. ‘Duties, Rules and Interpretations in Obligational Disputations’. In Yrjönsuuri, M. (ed.), Medieval Formal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 3–34.
Zachhuber, Johannes. 1999. Human Nature in Gregory of Nyssa: Philosophical Background and Theological Significance. Leiden: Brill.
Zimmermann, F.W. 1976. ‘Al-Farabi und die philosophische Kritik an Galen von Alexander zu Averroes’. In Dietriech, A. (ed.), Akten des VII. Kongresses für Arabistik und Islamwissenschaft, 15–22 August 1974, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Phil.-Hist. Klasse, Dritte Folge, Nr 98, Göttingen, 401–414.
Zonta, Mauro. 1997. ‘Fonti antiche e ledievali della logica ebraica nella Provenza del Trecento’. Medioevo 23: 515–594.Google Scholar
Zonta, Mauro. 2011. ‘About Todros Todrosi's Medieval Hebrew Translation of Al-Farabi Lost Long Commentary/Gloss-Commentary on Aristotle's Topics, Book VIII’. History and Philosophy of Logic 32(1): 37–45.Google Scholar
Zupko, Jack. 2003. John Buridan. University of Notre Dame Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Stephen Read, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449862.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Stephen Read, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449862.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Catarina Dutilh Novaes, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Stephen Read, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449862.017
Available formats
×