Works Cited

Abbott, F. F. (1907) ‘The theatre as a factor in Roman politics under the Republic’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 38: 49–56.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. (1999) ‘Introduction’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 1–18.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. eds. (1999) Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. London.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1989) ‘Homer, Vergil, and complex narrative structures in Roman poetry. An essay’, Illinois Classical Studies 14: 1–31.Google Scholar

Alexander, C. (2011) ‘Out of context’, New York Times, 6 April.Google Scholar

Allen, G. (2011) Intertextuality, 2nd edn. Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar

Alpers, P. (1979) The Singer of the Eclogues. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Alpers, P. (1996) What is Pastoral? Chicago.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, P. J. (2016) ‘Heracles’ choice: thoughts on the virtues of print and digital commentary’, in Kraus and Stray (2016) 483–93.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J., and Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979) ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm’, Journal of Roman Studies 69: 125–55.Google Scholar

Anderson, W. S. (1957) ‘Vergil’s Second Iliad’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 88: 17–30 = Harrison (1990) 239–52 = Hardie (1999) iii.74–86.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2002) ‘Vergil’s Italy: ethnography and politics in first-century Rome’, in Levene and Nelis (2002) 123–42.Google Scholar

Apostol, R. (2015) ‘Urbanus es, Corydon: ecocritiquing town and country in Eclogue 2’, Vergilius 61: 3–28.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1954) ‘What is authority?’ in Arendt (1961) 91–141.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1961) Between Past and Future. New York.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1981) The Life of the Mind. London.Google Scholar

Argenio, R. (1961) ‘Retorica e politica nelle tragedie de Accio’, Rivista di studi classici 9: 198–212.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M. B. eds. (2004) Virgil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin.Google Scholar

Armstrong, R. (2019) Vergil’s Green Thoughts. Plants, Humans, and the Divine. Oxford.Google Scholar

Arnold, M. (1964) Essays in Criticism: First and Second Series. London and New York.Google Scholar

Arnould, C. and Assenmaker, P. (2018) ‘Vergilius in nummis: Virgilian quotations on medals and tokens issued in the low countries during the second half of the sixteenth century’, in Houghton and Sgarbi (2018) 63–83.Google Scholar

Ascham, R. (1989) Letters of Roger Ascham, ed. Vos, A.. New York.Google Scholar

Attridge, D. (1974) Well-Weighed Syllables. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Auden, W. H. (1962) The Dyer’s Hand and Other Essays. New York.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. ed. (1927) ‘Virgil and the Sibyl’, Classical Quarterly 21: 100–5.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1955) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1964) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1968) ‘Ille ego qui quondam’, Classical Quarterly 18: 107–15.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1971) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Primus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Axelson, B. (1945) Unpoetische Wörter: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der lateinischen Dichtersprache. Lund.Google Scholar

Bain, I., Chambers, D., and Wilton, A. (1977) The Wood Engravings of William Blake. Seventeen Subjects Commissioned by Dr Robert Thornton for his ‘Virgil’ of 1821. London.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, trans. C. Emerson. Minneapolis.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1990) Art and Answerability. Early Philosophical Essays, ed. Holquist, M. and Liapunov, V.. Austin.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. (1997) ‘Storytelling in the future: truth, time and tense in Homeric epic’, in Bakker, E. and Kahane, A, eds., Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, 11–36. Cambridge, MA.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bal, M. (1985) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto and London.Google Scholar

Ball, R. (1991) ‘Theological semantics: Virgil’s Pietas and Dante’s Pietà’, in Jacoff and Schnapp (1991) 19–36.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. (2009) ‘Euripides’ Corinthian princess in the Aeneid’, Classical Philology 104: 317–30.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1984) La traccia del modello: effetti omerici nella narrazione virgiliana. Pisa.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1993) ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1994) ‘Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide’, Antike und Abendland 40: 109–24 = Barchiesi (1999).CrossRef Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997) The Poet and the Prince. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1999) ‘Representations of suffering and interpretation in the Aeneid’, in Hardie (1999) iii.324–44.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2005) ‘Learned eyes’, in Galinsky (2005) 281–305.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2006) ‘Le sofferenze dell’impero’, in Publio Virgilio Marone, Eneide, trans. and notes by Scarcia, R, v–xliv. Milan.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2008) ‘Roman Callimachus’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L., and Stephens, S., eds., Brill’s Companion to Callimachus, 511–30. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2012) ‘Roma e l’Eneide: impero e cittadinanza’, Classici contro 1: 43–57.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (2015) Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative, trans. I. Marchesi and M. Fox. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (forthcoming) The War for Italia. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. and Hardie, P. (2010) ‘The Ovidian career model: Ovid, Gallus, Apuleius, Boccaccio’, in Hardie and Moore (2010) 59–88.Google Scholar

Bardon, H. (1950) ‘L’Enéide et l’art des XVIe–XVIIIe siècles’, Gazette des beaux arts 37: 77–97.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (1981) Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Barnes, W. R. (2000) ‘Virgil: the literary impact’, in Horsfall (2000b) 257–92.Google Scholar

Barolini, T. (1984) Dante’s Poets: Textuality and Truth in the Comedy. Princeton.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barrell, J. and Bull, J. eds. (1974) The Penguin Book of English Pastoral Verse. London.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. (1970) ‘The authorship of the Culex: an evaluation of the evidence’, Latomus 29: 348–62.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. (1972) ‘Donatus and the date of the Culex’, Classical Philology 67: 280–7.Google Scholar

Barrow, R. (2001) ‘Painting Virgil: Victorian choices’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 24: 81–101.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1989) Decoding the Ancient Novel. Princeton.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. and Elsner, J. (2007) ‘Eight ways of looking at an ecphrasis’, Classical Philology 102: i–vi.Google Scholar

Basnett, S. (1991) Translation Studies, rev. edn. London and New York.Google Scholar

Baswell, C. (1995) Virgil in Medieval England. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (1984) ‘Georgics I: studies in meaning and criticism’, diss. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (1988) ‘On the surface of the Georgics’, Arethusa 21: 227–45.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (2003) Review of Gale (2000), Phoenix 57: 163–8.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumbach, M. (2010) ‘Aeneas’, in Grafton, A., Most, G. W. and Settis, S., eds., The Classical Tradition, 8–10. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar

Baxandall, M. (1985) Patterns of Intention. New Haven.Google Scholar

Bayer, A. ed. (2008) Art and Love in Renaissance Italy. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Beaumont, J. (1629) Bosworth Field. London.Google Scholar

Beck, D. (2014) ‘The first simile of the Aeneid’, Vergilius 60: 67–83.Google Scholar

Beck, F. A. G. (1964) Greek Education, 450–350 bc. London.Google Scholar

Becker, A. (2004) ‘Non oculis sed auribus: the ancient schoolroom and learning to hear the Latin hexameter’, Classical Journal 99: 313–22.Google Scholar

Bellessort, A. (1920) Virgile, son œuvre et son temps. Paris.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W. (1970) Illuminations, trans. H. Zohn. London.Google Scholar

Benko, S. (1980) ‘Virgil’s fourth Eclogue in Christian interpretation’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 31: 646–705.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. (1988) ‘The conversion of Vergil: the Aeneid in Augustine’s Confessions’, Revue des études augustiniennes 34: 47–69.Google Scholar

Béranger, J. (1953) Recherches sur l’aspect idéologique du principat. Basel.Google Scholar

Bernard, J. D. ed. (1986) Vergil at 2000: Commemorative Essays on the Poet and his Influence. New York.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. W., Gervais, K., and Lin, W. (2016) ‘Comparative rates of text reuse in classical Latin hexameter poetry’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 9.3, www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/3/000237/000237.html.Google Scholar

Bexley, E. M. (2016) ‘Recognition and the character of Seneca’s Medea’, Classical Journal 62: 31–51.Google Scholar

Bietenholz, P. G. (1994) Historia and Fabula: Myths and Legends in Historical Thought from Antiquity to the Modern Age. Leiden, New York, and Cologne.CrossRef Google Scholar

Biliński, B. (1958) Accio ed i Gracchi. Contributo alla storia della plebe e della tragedia romana. Rome.Google Scholar

Binder, G. (1971) Aeneas und Augustus: Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis. Meisenheim.Google Scholar

Binder, G. (2010) ‘Goldene Zeiten: Immer wieder wird ein Messias geboren … Beispiele neuzeitlicher Aneignung der 4. Ekloge Vergils’, in Burkard et al. (2010) 51–72.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1993) ‘Aratus and his audiences’, in Schiesaro et al. (1993) 99–129.Google Scholar

Bizer, M. (2011) Homer and the Politics of Authority. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Blanchot, M. (1971) Le livre à venir. Paris.Google Scholar

Blandford, D. W. (1993) Pentekontaetia: The Virgil Society 1943–1993. London.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (2011) Fragmenta Poetarum Latinorum, 4th edn. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Bloch, H. (1963) ‘The pagan revival in the west at the end of the fourth century’, in Momigliano, A., ed., The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century, 193–218. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1973) The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. London.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1995) The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. London.Google Scholar

Bocciolini Palagi, L. (2016) La musa e la furia: interpretazione del secondo proemio dell’Eneide. Bologna.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, M. and Stroumsa, G. eds. (2010) Paradise in Antiquity: Jewish and Christian Views. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bognini, F. (2005) ‘Per il commento virgiliano ascritto a Ilario di Orléans: a proposito delle “glose” al sesto libro dell’Eneide’, Acme 58: 129–73.Google Scholar

Bohlin, D. DeG. (1979) Prints and Related Drawings by the Carracci Family. A Catalogue Raisonné. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bök, C. (2015) The Xenotext: Book I. Toronto.Google Scholar

Bonfanti, M. (1985) Punto di vista e modi della narrazione nell’Eneide. Pisa.Google Scholar

Bosci, U. et al. eds. (1976) Enciclopedia dantesca, 6 vols. Rome.Google Scholar

Bouquet, M. and Méniel, B. eds. (2011) Servius et sa réception de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance. Rennes.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. R. Nice. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bowen, C. (1887) Virgil in English Verse. Eclogues and Aeneid I-VI. London.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1971) ‘A date in the eighth Eclogue’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 75: 73–80.Google Scholar

Bowra, C. M. (1933) ‘Aeneas and the Stoic ideal’, Greece & Rome 3: 8–21 = Harrison (1990) 363–77 = Hardie (1999) iii.204–17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1975) Ancient Pastoral. Berwick, Victoria.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1979) Virgil’s Ascraean Song: Ramus Essays on the Georgics. Berwick, Victoria.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1986) The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1993) ‘The canonic text: Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Boyle, A. J., ed., Roman Epic. London and New York.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1999) ‘Images of Rome’, in Perkell (1999a) 148–61.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (2006) An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. London.Google Scholar

Bradley, A. C. (1909) ‘Hegel’s theory of tragedy’, in Oxford Lectures on Poetry, 69–95. Oxford.Google Scholar

Braham, A. ed. (1978) Giovanni Battista Moroni: 400th Anniversary Exhibition. London.Google Scholar

Brammall, S. (2015) The English Aeneid: Translations of Virgil, 1555–1646. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Brasillach, R. (1931) Présence de Virgile. Paris.Google Scholar

Braund, S. (forthcoming) A Cultural History of Translations of Virgil: From the Twelfth Century to the Present. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Braund, S. and Gill, C. eds. (1997) The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Braund, S. and Torlone, Z. M. eds. (2018) Virgil and his Translators. Oxford.CrossRef Google Scholar

Breed, B. W. (2000) ‘Imitations of originality: Theocritus and Lucretius at the start of the Eclogues’, Vergilius 46: 3–20.Google Scholar

Breed, B. W. (2006) Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar

Breed, B., Damon, C. and Rossi, A. eds. (2010) Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bretzigheimer, G. (2005) ‘Poeta memor ludensque oder The Making of Ciris’, in Holzberg (2005) 142–224.Google Scholar

Briggs, W. W. (1980) Narrative and Simile from the Georgics in the Aeneid. Leiden.CrossRef Google Scholar

Briggs, W. W. (1981a) ‘Virgil and the Hellenistic epic’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. ii.948–84. Berlin.Google Scholar

Briggs, W. W. (1981b) ‘A bibliography of Virgil’s “Eclogues” (1927–1977)’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II. 31.2, 1267–357. Berlin.Google Scholar

Broch, H. (1945) Der Tod des Vergil, trans. J. S. Untermeyer (1983) The Death of Virgil. Oxford.Google Scholar

Broch, H. (1983) The Death of Virgil, trans. J. S. Untermeyer. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brock, R. (2013) Greek Political Imagery from Homer to Aristotle. London.Google Scholar

Brooks, P. (1984) Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York and London.Google Scholar

Brooks, P. (1994) Psychoanalysis and Storytelling. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brooten, B. J. (1998) Love between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism. Chicago.Google Scholar

Brown, D. B. (2010) ‘Empire and exile: Vergil in Romantic art’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 311–24.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1967) Augustine of Hippo, rev. edn. 2000. London.Google Scholar

Brown, S., Methuen, C., and Spicer, A. eds. (2018) The Church and Empire. Studies in Church History 55. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brownlee, M. S. (1990) The Severed Word. Ovid’s Heroides and the Novela Sentimental. Princeton.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brugnoli, G. and Stok, F. eds. (1997) Vitae vergilianae antiquae. Rome.Google Scholar

Brumble, H. D. (1998) Classical Myths and Legends in the Middle Ages and Renaissance. A Dictionary of Allegorical Meanings. London and Chicago.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1963) Vergil über die Sendung Roms. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1955) ‘P. Vergilius Maro’, Real-Encyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft VIIIa.1021–486.Google Scholar

Buffière, F. (1956) Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris.Google Scholar

Bühler, W. (1960) Die Europa des Moschos. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Bull, M. (2005) The Mirror of the Gods. Classical Mythology in Renaissance Art. London.Google Scholar

Bunting, B. (2000) Complete Poems. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar

Burbidge, J. (2009) ‘Dido, Anna and the Sirens (Vergil Aeneid 4, 437 ss.)’, Materiali e discussioni 62: 105–28.Google Scholar

Burck, E. (1929) ‘Die Komposition von Vergils Georgika’, Hermes 64: 279–321.Google Scholar

Burck, E. (1979) Das römische Epos. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Burden, M. ed. (1998) A Woman Scorn’d: Responses to the Dido Myth. London.Google Scholar

Burkard, T., Schauer, M., and Wiener, C. eds. (2010) Vestigia Vergiliana: Vergil-Rezeption in der Neuzeit. Berlin.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (1993) Epic Romance: Homer to Milton. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (2008) ‘English Renaissance readers and the Appendix Vergiliana’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 26: 1–16.Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (2013) Shakespeare and Classical Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burrow, C. (2016) ‘You’ve listened long enough’, Review of Seamus Heaney, Aeneid: Book VI, The London Review of Books, 21 April: 13–14.Google Scholar

Burzacchini, G. (2002) ‘Flectere si nequeo superos, Acheronta movebo (Verg. Aen. VII 312): Furores e guerra nel Lazio (con osservazioni sull’influsso di Euripide nel VII canto dell’Eneide’, Atti e memorie / Accademia Nazionale Virgiliana di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti. Mantova: Accademia Nazionale Virgiliana, n. s. 70: 19–61.Google Scholar

Cadili, L. ed. (2003) Scholia Bernensia in Vergilii Bucolica et Georgica, II 1, Georgica commentarii (Proemium-liber I 1–42). Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Cafritz, R. C., Gowing, L., and Rosand, D. (1988) Places of Delight: The Pastoral Landscape. London and Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. and Allan, W. (2011) ‘Conflict and community in the Iliad’, in Fisher, N. and van Wees, H., eds., Competition in the Ancient World, 113–46. Swansea.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1989) Virgil’s Augustan Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (2005) ‘Lavinia’s blush (Virgil Aeneid 12.64–70)’, in Cairns, D., ed., Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds, 195–213. Swansea.Google Scholar

Calabrese, O. (1992) Neo-Baroque: A Sign of the Times, trans. C. Lambert. Princeton.Google Scholar

Caldwell, C. (2017) Story Structure and Development: A Guide for Animators, VFX Artists, Game Designers, and Virtual Reality. Boca Raton.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and his Critics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2004) ‘Vergil illustrated between Pagans and Christians. Reconsidering “the late-4th c. Classical Revival”, the dates of the manuscripts, and the places of production of the Latin Classics’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 17: 502–25.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2011) The Last Pagans of Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Campbell, M. (1983) Studies in the Third Book of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1969) An Introduction to Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Camps, W. A. (1971) Literary Style: A Symposium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Carcopino, J. (1930) Virgile et le mystère de la IV Eglogue. Paris.Google Scholar

Carey, C. (2007) ‘Epic diffusion and identity’, in Nash, A. and Wilson, I., eds., Literary Cultures and the Material Book, 133–45. London.Google Scholar

Carlà-Uhink, F. (2017) ‘“Between the human and the divine”: cross-dressing and transgender dynamics in the Graeco-Roman world’, in Campanile, D., Carlà-Uhink, F., and Facella, M., eds., TransAntiquity. New York.Google Scholar

Cartault, A. (1926) L’art de Virgile dans l’Énéide, 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2004–5) ‘Further voices in Ovid Heroides 7’, Hermathena 177–8: 141–58.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2006) ‘Other voices in Ovid’s Aeneid’, in Knox, P. E., ed., Oxford Readings in Ovid, 144–65. Oxford [originally published as ‘Altre voci nell’ Eneide di Ovidio’, Materiali e discussioni 35: 59–76].Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2008) ‘Agudezas virgiliane nel commento all’Eneide di Juan Luis de la Cerda’, in Santini and Stok (2008) 233–62.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2010) ‘The development of the Aeneas legend’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 37–51.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2011) ‘The Bellum Civile as an anti-Aeneid’, in Asso, P., ed., Brill’s Companion to Lucan, 81–109. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Casali, S. (2017) Virgilio, Eneide 2, introduzione, traduzione, e commento. Pisa.Google Scholar

Casali, S. and Stok, F. eds. (2008) Servius: Exegetical Stratifications and Cultural Models. Brussels.Google Scholar

Casalini, C. and Pavur, C. (2016) Jesuit Pedagogy, 1540–1616: A Reader. Chestnut Hill.Google Scholar

Casanova-Robin, H. ed. (2014) Virgile: Bucoliques. Paris.Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. trans. (1991) St Augustine. Confessions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Chalker, J. (1969) The English Georgic. London.Google Scholar

Champlin, E. J. (1978) ‘The life and times of Calpurnius Siculus’, Journal of Roman Studies 68: 95–110.Google Scholar

Chater, N. (2018) The Mind is Flat: The Illusion of Mental Depth and the Improvised Mind. London.Google Scholar

Chaucer, G. (1987) The Riverside Chaucer, ed. Benson, L. D. et al., 3rd edn. Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Chaudhuri, P., Dexter, J. P., and Katz, T. et al. (2017) ‘Quantitative criticism of literary relationships’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1611910114.Google Scholar

Cheney, P. and de Armas, F. A. eds. (2002) European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Toronto.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chevallier, R. ed. (1978) Présence de Virgile. Paris.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2005) ‘The concept of the classical and the canons of model authors in Roman literature’, in Porter, J. I., ed., Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, 204–34. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Claassen, J.-M. (1999) ‘Classics for the next millennium: African options’, The Classical Outlook 76: 125–32.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2010) ‘Paradise for pagans? Augustine on Virgil, Cicero and Plato’, in Bockmuehl and Stroumsa (2010) 166–78.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2015) Monica: An Ordinary Saint. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2017) ‘In praise of the wax candle: Augustine the Poet and late Latin literature’, in Elsner and Hernández Lobato (2017) 424–46.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2018) ‘Imperium and the City of God: Augustine on church and empire’, in Brown, Methuen, and Spicer (2018) 46–70.Google Scholar

Clark, R. J. (1978) Catabasis: Vergil and the Wisdom-Tradition. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1964) ‘An interpretation of the Aeneid’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68: 139–47.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1972) ‘On the date of the First Eclogue’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 76: 201–6.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1986) ‘Cicero and the new poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 159–70.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1987) Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1994) Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (2000) ‘Appendix’, in Horsfall (2000b) 313–14.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (2002) Virgil’s Aeneid: Decorum, Allusion, and Ideology. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V., Goodyear, F. R. D., Kenney, E. J., and Richmond, J. A. eds. (1966) Appendix Vergiliana. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (1993) The Best of the Argonauts: The Redefinition of the Epic Hero in Book I of Apollonius’ Argonautica. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (2016) ‘The Hercules and Cacus episode in Augustan literature: engaging the Homeric Hymn to Hermes in light of Callimachus’ and Apollonius’ reception’, in Faulkner, A., Vergados, A. and Schwab, A., eds. The Reception of the Homeric Hymns, 79–94. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clay, J. S. (1993) ‘The education of Perses’, in Schiesaro et al. (1993) 23–4.Google Scholar

Clift, E. H. (1945) Latin Pseudepigrapha: A Study in Attribution. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Codina Mir, J. (1968) Aux sources de la pédagogie des Jésuites. Le ‘modus Parisiensis’. Rome.Google Scholar

Coffee, N. and Bernstein, N. (2016) ‘Digital methods and classical studies’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 10.2. Available at: www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/2/index.html.Google Scholar

Coffee, N., Koenig, J.-P., Poornima, S., Ossewaarde, R., Forstall, C., and Jacobson, S. (2012) ‘Intertextuality in the digital age’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 142: 383–422.CrossRef Google Scholar

Coleman, R. ed. (1977) Vergil, Eclogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (1982) ‘The gods in the Aeneid’, Greece & Rome 29: 143–68.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. (1999) ‘Poetic diction, poetic discourse and the poetic register’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 21–93.Google Scholar

Collard, C. (1975) ‘Medea and Dido’, Prometheus 1: 131–51.Google Scholar

Commager, S. ed. (1966) Virgil: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar

Commager, S (1981) ‘Fateful words: some conversations in Aeneid 4’, Arethusa 14: 10–14.Google Scholar

Comparetti, D. (1997) Vergil in the Middle Ages, trans. E. F. M. Benecke (1st edn 1895). Princeton.Google Scholar

Condon, P., Cohn, M. B., and Mongan, A. (1983) Ingres: In Pursuit of Perfection. The Art of J.-A.-D. Ingres. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Conington, J. ed. (1872) The Works of Virgil, with a Commentary, vol. ii. London.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2001) ‘Picture Arcadia: the politics of representation in Vergil’s Eclogues’, Vergilius 47: 89–116.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2010) ‘Vergil and the challenge of autocracy’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 404–17.Google Scholar

Conrad, C. (1965) ‘Traditional patterns of word-order in Latin epic from Ennius to Virgil’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 69: 195–258.CrossRef Google Scholar

Consoli, D. and Ronconi, A. (1976) ‘Virgilio’ and ‘Echi Virgiliani’, in Bosci et al. (1976).Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1966) ‘Il proemio della Pharsalia’, Maia 18: 42–53.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca, NY, and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1992) ‘Proems in the middle’, Yale Classical Studies 29: 147–59.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1993) Review of Harrison (1991), Journal of Roman Studies 83: 208–12.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994a) Latin Literature. A History. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994b) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, trans. G. W. Most. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2007) The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (2016) Critical Notes on Virgil: Editing the Teubner Text of the Georgics and Aeneid. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. ed. (2010) Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Text, Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cooper, H. (1977) Pastoral: Mediaeval into Renaissance. Ipswich.Google Scholar

Copeland, R. and Sluiter, I. eds. (2012) Medieval Grammar and Rhetoric: Language Arts and Literary Theory ad 300–1475. Oxford.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2015) Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Courcelle, J. (1984) Lecteurs païens et lecteurs chrétiens de l’Enéide. Mémoires de l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres, n.s. 4, 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. (1957) ‘Les exégèses chrétiennes de la quatrième Eglogue’, Revue des études anciennes 59: 294–319.Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. and Courcelle, J. (1989) Lecteurs païens et lecteurs chrêtiens de l’Énéide, vol. ii: Les manuscrits illustrés de l’Énéide du Xe au XVe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1968) ‘The textual transmission of the Appendix Vergiliana’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 15: 133–41.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1993) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2015) ‘On the weak king according to Vergil: Aeolus, Latinus, and political allegoresis in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 61: 97–124.Google Scholar

Cox, F. (1999) Aeneas Takes the Metro: The Presence of Virgil in Twentieth-Century French Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cox, F. (2011) Sibylline Sisters. Virgil’s Presence in Contemporary Women’s Writing. Oxford.Google Scholar

Crusius, O. (1899) ‘Cento’, Real-Encyclopädie Der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft 3: 1929–32.Google Scholar

Cucchiarelli, A. ed. and Traina, A. trans. (2012) Publio Virgilio Marone. Le Bucoliche. Lingue e letterature Carocci, 141. Rome.Google Scholar

Cupaiuolo, G. ed. (1984) Il De rosis nascentibus: introduzione, testo critico, traduzione, e commento. Rome.Google Scholar

Curtius, E. R. (1953) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, trans. W. R. Trask. London, Henley, and New York.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, H. (1954) Der Bienenstaat in Vergils Georgica, Akad. der Wissen. und der Lit. Mainz 10: 547–62. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Daiches, D. and Thorlby, A. eds. (1972) Literature and Western Civilization, vol. i: The Classical World. London.Google Scholar

Dainotti, P. (2015) Word Order and Expressiveness in the Aeneid, trans. A. Campbell. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Daintree, D. (1990) ‘The Virgil commentary of Aelius Donatus – black hole or “éminence grise”?’, Greece & Rome 37: 65–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dal Pozzolo, E. M. (1998) Giovanni Bonconsiglio detto Marescalco: l’opera completa. Milan.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2010) ‘Déjà vu or déjà lu? History as intertext’, in Cairns, F. and Griffin, M., eds. Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar, vol. xiv, ARCA 50, 375–88. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Alighieri, Dante (1970–5) The Divine Comedy, trans. C. S. Singleton, 3 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar

Davie, D. (2000) Two Ways out of Whitman: American Essays. Manchester.Google Scholar

Davie, D. (2006) Purity of Diction in English Verse and Articulate Energy. Manchester.Google Scholar

Davis, C. T. (1993) ‘Dante and the empire’, in Jacoff, R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Dante, 67–79. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Davis, G. (2012) Parthenope: The Interplay of Ideas in Vergilian Bucolic. Leiden and Boston, MA.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davis, P. (2008) Translation and the Poet’s Life. Oxford.Google Scholar

Day Lewis, C. trans. (1947) The Georgics of Virgil. New York.Google Scholar

Day Lewis, C. trans. (1966) The Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid of Virgil. Oxford.Google Scholar

De Angelis, V. (1997) ‘I commenti medievali alla Tebaide di Stazio: Anselmo di Laon, Goffredo Babione, Ilario d’Orléans’, in Mann, N. and Munk Olsen, B., eds., Medieval and Renaissance Scholarship: Proceedings of the Second European Science Foundation Workshop on the Classical Tradition in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Leiden, New York, and Cologne.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. (1987 ) Narrators and Focalisers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. (2001) A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. (2014) Narratology and Classics. A Practical Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. (2017) I classici e la narratologia, ed. Cucchiarelli, A.. Rome.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. and Sullivan, J. P. eds. (1994) Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar

de la Bédoyère, G. (1998) ‘Carausius and the marks RSR and INPCDA’, The Numismatic Chronicle 158: 79–88.Google Scholar

de Santis, G. and Ames, C. (2011) ‘La memoria historica de la diversidad étnica italiana en Eneida de Virgilio’, Circe 15: 41–54.Google Scholar

De Temmerman, K. ed. (2017) Characterization in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar

de Tervarent, G. (1967) Présence de Virgile dans l’art. Brussels.Google Scholar

de Vergnette, F. (1989) ‘Virgile lisant l’Enéide, thème néo-classique illustré par Ingres et quelques autres’, Bulletin du Musée Ingres 59–60: 79–95.Google Scholar

Dekel, E. (2012) Virgil’s Homeric Lens. New York and London.Google Scholar

Delacourcelle, D. (1954) ‘Germain Vaillant de Guélis, Abbot of Paimpont (1516–1587)’, Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 16: 336–61.Google Scholar

Delvigo, M. L. (2013) ‘Per transitum tangit historiam: intersecting developments of Roman identity in Vergil’, in Farrell and Nelis (2013) 19–39.Google Scholar

Denecke, W. (2013) Classical World Literatures: Sino-Japanese and Greco-Roman Comparisons. Oxford.Google Scholar

Deremetz, A. (2001) ‘Énée aède. Tradition auctoriale et (re)fondation d’un genre’, in Schmidt (2001) 143–81.Google Scholar

Deremetz, A. (2009) ‘The question of the marvellous in the Georgics of Virgil’, in Hardie (2009a) 113–25.Google Scholar

Deroux, C. ed. (1980) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History. Brussels.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1981) ‘The law of genre’, Glyph 7: 176–229.Google Scholar

Dewald, C., Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D. (1997) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton.Google Scholar

Dewar, M. (1994) ‘Laying it on with a trowel: the proem to Lucan and related texts’, Classical Quarterly 44: 199–211.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dhanens, E. (1973) Van Eyck: The Ghent Altarpiece. London.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. eds. (2010) Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Diels, H. A. and Kranz, W. (1951) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin.Google Scholar

Dietz, D. B. (1989) ‘Elementi di una poetica Serviana’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 82: 56–109, 240–60.Google Scholar

Dietz, D. B. (1995) ‘Historia in the commentary of Servius’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 125: 61–97.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J. (2015) ‘Similes and their programmatic role in the Thebaid’, in Dominik et al. (2015) 266–90.Google Scholar

Dominik, W. J., Newlands, C. E., and Gervais, K. eds. (2015) Brill’s Companion to Statius. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Douglas, G. (1957–64) Virgil’s Aeneid Translated into Scottish Verse, ed. Coldwell, D. F. C., 4 vols. Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar

Douglas, G. (2011) The Aeneid (1513), ed. Kendal, G., 2 vols. London.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1978) Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Dow, S. (1968) ‘Latin calligraphy at Hawara. P. Hawara 24’, Journal of Roman Studies 58: 60–70.Google Scholar

Drabble, M. (2002) The Seven Sisters. London.Google Scholar

Dryden, J. trans. (1987) The Works of Virgil in English, vols. v and vi, ed. Frost, W and Dearing, V. A.. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. (1969) Vergil and Classical Hexameter Poetry: A Study in Metrical Variety. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dunbabin, K. M. D. (1999) Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dunlap, D. W. (2014) ‘A memorial inscription’s grim origins’, New York Times, 2 April.Google Scholar

Dupont, F. (2011) Rome, la villa sans origine. L’Éneide: un grand récit du métissage. Paris.Google Scholar

DuQuesnay, I. M. Le M. (1979) ‘From Polyphemus to Corydon’, in West and Woodman (1979) 35–69.Google Scholar

DuQuesnay, I. M. Le M. (1981) ‘Vergil’s First Eclogue’, in Cairns, F., ed., Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, iii.29–182. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Dyson, J. T. (2001) King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil’s Aeneid. Norman.Google Scholar

Easterling, P. (1978) ‘Presentation of character in Aeschylus’, Greece & Rome 20: 3–19.Google Scholar

Eastin, K. (2016) ‘Visualizing Virgil: the pictorial agenda(s) of Sebastian Brant’, Mouseion 13: 85–129.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2007) The Age of Augustus, 2nd edn. Malden, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar

Eco, E. (1989) The Open Work, trans. Cancogni, A. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Eden, P. T. ed. (1975) A Commentary on Virgil: Aeneid VIII. Leiden.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, M. W. (2002) Sound, Sense, and Rhythm: Listening to Greek and Latin Poetry. Princeton.Google Scholar

Efstathiou, A. and Karamanou, I. eds. (2016) Homer Receptions across Generic and Cultural Contexts. Trends in Classics Suppl. vol. 37. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Egan, R. B. (1980) ‘Euryalus’ mother and Aeneid 9–12’, in Deroux (1980) vol. ii, 157–76.Google Scholar

Egginton, W. (2010) The Theater of Truth: The Ideology of (Neo)Baroque Aesthetics. Stanford.Google Scholar

Ehrman, B. D. (2013) Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1951) Selected Essays. London.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (1957) On Poetry and Poets. London.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2008) ‘Ennian epic and Ennian tragedy in the language of the Aeneid: Aeneas’ generic wandering and the construction of the Latin literary past’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 104: 241–72.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2013) Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elmer, D. F. (2013) The Poetics of Consent. Collective Decision Making and the Iliad. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. ed. (1994) Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (2007) Roman Eyes. Princeton.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. and Hernández Lobato, J. eds (2017) The Poetics of Late Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. and Masters, J. eds. (1994) Reflections of Nero. London.Google Scholar

Emison, P. (2005) ‘Raphael’s multiples’, in Hall, M. B., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Raphael, 186–206. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Empson, W. (1935) Some Versions of Pastoral. London.Google Scholar

Enenkel, K. A. E. (2014) Transformations of the Classics via Early Modern Commentaries. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Enenkel, K. A. E. and Hellen, H. (2013) ‘Introduction: Neo-Latin commentaries and the management of knowledge’, in Enenkel, K. A. E. and Hellen, H., eds., (2013) Neo-Latin Commentaries and the Management of Knowledge in the Late Middle Ages and in the Early Modern Period (1400–1700). Leuven.Google Scholar

Fabre-Serris, J. (2013) ‘Le Culex et la construction du mythe augustéen: pratiques et enjeux d’un poème faussement adressé à Octave’, in Labate and Rosati (2013) 285–302.Google Scholar

Fagiolo, M. ed. (1981) Virgilio nell’arte e nella cultura europea. Rome.Google Scholar

Fairer, D. (2016) ‘Georgic’, in Lynch, J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of British Poetry, 1660–1800, 457–72. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2009) Latin Poets and Italian Gods. Toronto.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. (1998) ‘Textual misadventures of Daphnis: the pseudo-Theocritean Idyll 8 and the origins of the bucolic “manner”’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C., eds., Theocritus, 61–77. Groningen.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. (2015) ‘The aesthetics of sequentiality and its discontents’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015) 405–29.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M., Reitz, C., and Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. (2017) ‘Ekphrasis’, Brill’s New Pauly. Leiden.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Tsagalis, C. eds. (2015) The Greek Epic Cycle and its Ancient Reception: A Companion. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Faral, E. (1924) Les arts poétiques du XIIe et du XIIIe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Farinella, V. ed. (2011) Virgilio: volti e immagini del poeta. Milan.Google Scholar

Farrell, A. P. (1970) The Jesuit Ratio studiorum of 1599. Translated into English, with an Introduction and Explanatory Notes. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the Tradition of Ancient Epic. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1997) ‘The Virgilian intertext’, in Martindale (1997) 222–38.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (1999) ‘Aeneid V: poetry and parenthood’, in Perkell (1999a) 96–110.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2002) ‘Greek lives and Roman careers in the classical vita tradition’, in Cheney and de Armas (2002) 24–46.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2004) ‘Ovid’s Virgilian career’, Materiali e discussioni 52: 41–55.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2005) ‘Intention and intertext’, Phoenix 59: 98–111.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2008) ‘Servius and the Homeric scholia’, in Casali and Stok (2008) 112–31.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2010) ‘Vergil’s detractors’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 435–48.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. (2016) ‘Ancient commentaries on Theocritus’ Idylls and Vergil’s Eclogues’, in Kraus and Stray (2016) 397–418.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Nelis, D., eds. (2013) Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Putnam, M. eds. (2010) A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and its Tradition. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Farron, S. (1993) Vergil’s Aeneid: A Poem of Grief and Love. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2002) ‘L’immagine come interpretazione nei manoscritti latini’, Euphrosyne n.s. 30: 297–316.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1983) ‘The taciturnity of Aeneas’, Classical Quarterly 33: 204–19 = Harrison (1990) 167–90 = Hardie (1999) iii.183–203.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1984) ‘The reconciliations of Juno’, Classical Quarterly 34: 179–94 = Harrison (1990) 339–62 = Hardie (1999) iv.392–413.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1986) ‘History and revelation in Vergil’s underworld’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 32: 1–24 = Hardie (1999) iii.221–43.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics in the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2014) ‘First similes in epic’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 144: 189–228.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fenik, B. C. (1960) ‘The influence of Euripides on Vergil’s Aeneid’, diss. Princeton.Google Scholar

Fenzi, E. (2011) ‘Servio, Simone Martini, Petrarca: un percorso attraverso il Virgilio Ambrosiano’, in Bouquet and Méniel (2011) 409–41.Google Scholar

Fernandelli, M. (2002) ‘Come sulle scene. Eneide 4 e la tragedia’, Dipartimento di filologia linguistica e tradizione classica ‘Augusto Rostagni’. Quaderni 19, n. s. 1: 141–211.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J. L. (2009) ‘The powers of Augustus’, in Edmondson, J., ed., Augustus, 90–136. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Ferri, R. (2011) ‘The language of Latin epic and lyric poetry’, in Clackson, J., ed., A Companion to the Latin Language, 344–66. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Field, R. (2017) ‘The classics, African literature, and the critics’, English in Africa 44: 73–95.Google Scholar

Finglass, P. J. (2020) ‘Tegit rem inhonestam: Sophocles’ Tecmessa and Virgil’s Dido’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 30.Google Scholar

Fiorini Galassi, M. G., Guerra, B., and Schiatti, S. (1981) Virgilio: alla ricerca del volto. Suzzara.Google Scholar

Fish, S. E. (1980) Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretative Communities. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, R. trans. (1984) The Aeneid. Virgil. New York.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2010) ‘Vergil in music’, in Putnam and Farrell (2010) 341–52.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, W. (2016) ‘Resonance: the sonic environment of Vergil’s Eclogues’, Dictynna 13.Google Scholar

Fletcher, K. F. B. (2014) Finding Italy: Travel, Nation, and Colonization in Vergil’s Aeneid. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Flintoff, T. E. S. (1976) ‘Characterisation in Virgil’s Eclogues’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 15: 16–26.Google Scholar

Floyd, E. D. (2014) ‘Dollar bill, American’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) i.377.Google Scholar

Fordyce, C. J. ed. (1977) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Libri VII–VIII with a Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Forstall, C., Coffee, N., Buck, T. Roache, K., and Jacobson, S. (2015) ‘Modeling the scholars: detecting intertextuality through enhanced word-level n-gram matching’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 30: 503–15.Google Scholar

Foster, K. (1977) The Two Dantes and Other Studies. London.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, trans. P. Kamuf. New York and London.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1987) ‘Vergil on killing virgins’, in Whitby et al. (1987) 185–98.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1989) ‘First thoughts on closure: problems and prospects’, Materiali e discussioni 22: 75–122 = Fowler (2000a) 239–83.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1990) ‘Deviant focalisation in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 216: 42–63 = Fowler (2000a) 40–63.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1991) ‘Narrate and describe: the problem of ekphrasis’, Journal of Roman Studies 81: 25–35 = Fowler (2000a) 64–85.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1994) ‘Arts and the Mantuan’, review of Ziolkowski (1993), Times Literary Supplement 11 February: 25.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1995) ‘From epos to cosmos: Lucretius, Ovid, and the poetics of segmentation’, in Innes et al. (1995) 1–18.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1997) ‘Second thoughts on closure’, in Dewald et al. (1997) 3–22 = Fowler (2000a) 284–308.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (2000a) Roman Constructions. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (2000b) ‘Epic in the middle of the wood’, in Sharrock and Morales (2000) 89–113.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. L. ed. (2004) The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1945) ‘Some aspects of the structure of Aeneid 7’, Journal of Roman Studies 35: 1–14 = Harrison (1990) 253–76.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1952) ‘The Culex’, Journal of Roman Studies 42: 1–9.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1966) ‘The Dirae’, Journal of Roman Studies 56: 142–55.Google Scholar

Franklin, M. (2014) ‘Vergil and the femina furens: reading the Aeneid in Renaissance cassone paintings’, Vergilius 60: 127–44.Google Scholar

Fredericksen, E. (2015) ‘Finding another Alexis: pastoral tradition and the reception of Vergil’s eclogue’, Classical Receptions Journal 7: 422–41.Google Scholar

Fressura, M. (2017) Vergilius Latinograecus: corpus dei manoscritti bilingui dell’Eneide. Parte prima (1–8). Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar

Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. (2009) ‘Political and religious propaganda between 44 and 27 bc’, Vergilius 55: 17–30.Google Scholar

Friedlaender, P. ed. (1962 [1912]) Johannes von Gaza, Paulus Silentiarius und Prokopios von Gaza, 2nd edn. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Frier, B. W. (1999) Review of C. A. Williams, Roman Homosexuality, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 11.05.Google Scholar

Frizzarin, A. (2017) ‘Counterfactuals in the Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 29: 75–102.Google Scholar

Frost, R. (1962) In the Clearing. New York.Google Scholar

Frost, W. (1982) ‘Translating Virgil, Douglas to Dryden: some general considerations’, in Mack and deForest Lord (1982) 271–86.Google Scholar

Fry, P. H. (2000) ‘Classical standards in the period’, in Brown, M., ed., The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. v: Romanticism, 7–28. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fuhrer, T. (1989) ‘Aeneas: a study in character development’, Greece & Rome 36: 63–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Funaioli, G. (1930) Esegesi virgiliana antica. Milan.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (1975) Truth and Method, trans. W. Glen-Doepel. London.Google Scholar

Gagarin, M. (1990) ‘Ambiguity of Eris in the Works and Days’, in Griffith and Mastronarde (1990) 173–83.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, P. (2014) Commento alla decima ecloga di Virgilio, Spudasmata 161. Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York.Google Scholar

Gaisser, J. H. ed. (2007) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Catullus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (1991) ‘Man and beast in Lucretius and the Georgics’, Classical Quarterly 41: 414–26.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1966) ‘The Hercules-Cacus episode in Aeneid VIII’, American Journal of Philology 87: 18–51 = Hardie (1999) iii.273–303.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1968) ‘Aeneid V and the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 89: 157–85 = Hardie (1999) iii.182–206.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1972) The Herakles Theme. Oxford.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1981) ‘Vergil’s Romanitas and his adaptation of Greek heroes’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 31.2: 985–1010.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1988) ‘The anger of Aeneas’, American Journal of Philology 109: 321–48 = Hardie (1999) iv.434–55.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1994) ‘How to be philosophical about the end of the Aeneid’, Illinois Classical Studies 19: 191–201.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (1996) Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (2003) ‘Greek and Roman drama and the Aeneid’, in Braund, D. and Gill, C. eds. Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman, 275–94. Exeter.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (2005) The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Galinsky, G. K. (2015) ‘Augustus’ auctoritas and Res Gestae 34.3’, Hermes 143: 244–9.Google Scholar

Gall, D. (1999) Zur Technik von Anspielung und Zitat in der römischen Dichtung: Vergil, Gallus, und die Ciris. Munich.Google Scholar

Ganiban, R. T. (2007) Statius and Virgil: The Thebaid and the Reinterpretation of the Aeneid. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ganiban, R. T. (2010) ‘Virgil’s Dido and the heroism of Hannibal in Silius’ Punica’, in Augoustakis, A., ed., Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus, 73–98. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Ganiban, R. T. (2014) ‘Virgilian prophecy and the reign of Jupiter in Valerius’ Argonautica’, in Heerink, M. and Manuwald, G., eds. Brill’s Companion to Valerius Flaccus, 252–68. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Garber, F. (1988) ‘Intertext and metatext in Blake’s illustrations to Thornton’s Virgil’, Centennial Review 32: 163–94.Google Scholar

Garcea, A., Lhommé, M.-K., and Vallat, D. eds. (2016) Fragments d’érudition. Servius et le savoir antique. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Gärtner, U. (2015) ‘Virgil and the Epic Cycle’, in Fantuzzi and Tsagalis (2015) 543–64.Google Scholar

Gasti, H. (2010) ‘Narrative self-consciousness in Virgil’s Aeneid 3’, Dictynna 7.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1980) Narrative Discourse, trans. C. Lewin. Cornell.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1981) Palimpsestes: la littérature au second degré. Paris.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1997) Paratexts. Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Georgii, H. (1912) ‘Zur Bestimmung der Zeit des Servius’, Philologus 71: 518–26.Google Scholar

Gervais, K. (2017) ‘Odi(tque moras): abridging allusions to Vergil, Aeneid 12 in Statius, Thebaid 12’, American Journal of Philology 138: 305–29.Google Scholar

Geue, T. (2013) ‘Princeps, avant la lettre: the foundations of Augustus in pre-Augustan Poetry’, in Labate and Rosati (2013) 49–68.Google Scholar

Geue, T. (2018) ‘Soft hands, hard power: sponging off the empire of leisure (Virgil, Georgics 4)’, Journal of Roman Studies 108, www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-roman-studies/article/soft-hands-hard-power-sponging-off-the-empire-of-leisure-virgil-georgics-4/66E3F339681B42F68DC84FEB7453330F.Google Scholar

Geymonat, M. (1984) ‘Filargirio Gallo-Romano?’, in Atti del convegno nazionale di studio su Virgilio, 171–4. Turin.Google Scholar

Gibbons, E. (1853) The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S. eds. (2002) The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden, Boston, MA, and Cologne.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (2004) ‘Vergil in the shadow of Vesuvius’, in Armstrong et al. (2004) 85–99.Google Scholar

Gill, C. ed. (1991) The Person and the Human Mind: Essays in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (1996) Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2004) ‘Character and passion in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 25: 111–24.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gillis, D. (1983) Eros and Death in the Aeneid. Rome.Google Scholar

Giomini, R. (1996) ‘Appendix vergiliana’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 1: 233–9. Rome.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2018) Carthage in Virgil’s Aeneid. Staging the Enemy under Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gladhill, C. W. (2012) ‘Sons, mothers, and sex’, Vergilius 58: 159–68.Google Scholar

Glei, R. (1997) Der Vater der Dinge: Interpretationen zur politischen, literarischen und kulturellen Dimension des Krieges bei Vergil. Trier.Google Scholar

Goldberg, J. (1992) Sodometries: Renaissance Texts/Modern Sexualities. Stanford.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1995) Epic in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1991) The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1997) ‘Modern critical approaches to Greek tragedy’, in Easterling, P., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, 324–47. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. D. and Osborne, R. eds. (1994) Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. (2013) Shaggy Crowns. Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. (1955) ‘Apollonio di Giovanni: a Florentine cassone workshop seen through the eyes of a humanist poet’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 18: 16–34.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. ed. (1965) Incerti auctoris Aetna. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1977) ‘The Copa: a text and commentary’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 24: 117–31.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1981) The Annals of Tacitus, vol. ii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1970) ‘Servius and the Helen episode’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 101–68 = Harrison (1990), 60–126.Google Scholar

Goold, G. P. (1992) ‘The voice of Virgil: the pageant of Rome in Aeneid 6’, in Woodman, T. and Powell, J., eds., Author and Audience in Latin Literature, 110–23. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gorgemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. A. eds. (1976) Studien zum antiken Epos. Meisenheim.Google Scholar

Görler, W. (1985) ‘Eneide: la lingua’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 2: 262–78. Rome.Google Scholar

Görler, W. (1999) ‘Rowing strokes: tentative considerations on “shifting” objects in Virgil and elsewhere’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 269–86.Google Scholar

Gorrichon, M. (1979) ‘Sebastien Brant et l’illustration des œuvres de Virgile d’après l’édition strasbourgeoise de 1502’, in Tuynman, P. et al., eds., Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Amstelodamensis: Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies, Amsterdam, 19–24 August 1973, 440–52. Munich.Google Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. ed. (1950) Theocritus Edited with a Translation and Commentary, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and Memory. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grafton, A. (1990) Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship. Princeton.Google Scholar

Grafton, A. (2010) ‘Commentary’, in Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Settis, S., eds., The Classical Tradition, 225–33. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Settis, S. eds. (2010) The Classical Tradition. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. ed. (1976) Virgil, Aeneid Book VIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1984) Virgil’s Iliad: An Essay on Epic Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1991) Virgil, Aeneid Book XI. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1996) Virgil in English. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (2004) Virgil: The Aeneid, 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graves, R. (1962) ‘The Virgil cult’, Virginia Quarterly Review 38: 13–47.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2002) Inventing Homer: The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2008) ‘The ancient reception of Homer’, in Hardwick and Stray (2007) 26–37.Google Scholar

Grebe, S. (2004) ‘Augustus’ divine authority and Vergil’s Aeneid’, Vergilius 50: 35–62.Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. ed. (1991) The Works of Ausonius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. (1999) Decimi Magni Ausonii opera. Oxford.Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. (2006) Latin Epics of the New Testament. Juvencus, Sedulius, Arator. Oxford.Google Scholar

Green, S. D. (2005) ‘A fifteenth-century Sienese fabula: the dynastic and patriotic significance of the Piccolomini Library’, in Jenkens, A. L., ed., Renaissance Siena: Art in Context, 155–72. Kirksville, MO.Google Scholar

Green, S. J. (2014) ‘Alternatives to Aeneas: meditations on leadership and military discipline in Virgil, Aeneid 9’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 28: 99–122.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1979) ‘The Fourth Georgic, Virgil and Rome’, Greece & Rome 26: 61–80 = Hardie (1999) ii.268–88 = Volk (2008b) 225–48.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1984) ‘Augustus and the poets: “Caesar qui cogere posset”’, in Miller and Segal (1984) 189–218.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1985) Latin Poets and Roman Life. London.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1986) Virgil. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1992) ‘Virgil’, in Jenkyns (1992) 125–50.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics, and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin and Barnes (1989) 1–37.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. and Barnes, W. R. eds. (1989) Philosophia Togata. Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. (1983) ‘Personality in Hesiod’, Classical Anthology 2: 37–65.Google Scholar

Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. eds. (1990) Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Günther, H.-C. ed. (2015) Virgilian Studies. A Miscellany Dedicated to the Memory of Mario Geymonat. Nordhausen.Google Scholar

Gurval, R. A. (1995) Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Haber, J. (1994) Pastoral and the Poetics of Self-Contradiction: Theocritus to Marvell. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1985) ‘Prose cola and poetic word-order: observations on adjectives and nouns in the Aeneid’, Helios 12: 51–66.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. (1997) ‘The invention of sexuality in the world-city of Rome’, in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997) 23–43.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. N. and Schiesaro, A., eds. (1997) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hadas, D. (2013) ‘Christians, Sibyls and Eclogue 4’, Recherches augustiniennes et patristiques 37: 51–129.Google Scholar

Haecker, T. (1934) Virgil, Father of the West, trans. A. W. Wheen. London and New York.Google Scholar

Hagen, H. ed. (1867) Scholia Bernensia ad Vergili Bucolica atque Georgica. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hagen, H. (1902) Appendix Serviana. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1958) The Latin Fathers and the Classics. Göteborg.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1967) Augustine and the Latin Classics. Göteburg.Google Scholar

Hahn, K.-H. and Schmid, I. eds. (1981) Briefe an Göethe, ii.1796–8. Weimar.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B., eds. (1997) Roman Sexualities. Princeton.Google Scholar

Halliburton, D. (1981) Poetic Thinking: An Approach to Heidegger. Chicago.Google Scholar

Halperin, D. M. (1983) Before Pastoral: Theocritus and The Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Hammer, D. (2009) ‘Homer and political thought’, in Salkever, S., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Political Thought, 15–41. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammer, D. (2014) Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hamon, P. (1975) ‘Clausules’, Poétique 6: 496–526.Google Scholar

Hamon, P. (1993) Du descriptif. Paris.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A. ed. (2012) Callimachus: Aetia, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Walker, G. C. eds. (1993) Callimachus. Gronigen.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1991) ‘The Aeneid and the Oresteia’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 20: 29–45.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1993) The Epic Successors of Virgil. A Study in the Dynamics of the Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1994) Virgil, Aeneid Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1995) ‘Virgil’s epic techniques: Heinze ninety years on’, Classical Philology 90: 267–76.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1998) Virgil (Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics). Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1999) Critical Assessments of Classical Authors: Virgil, 4 vols. London.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2002) ‘Another look at Virgil’s Ganymedes’, in Wiseman (2002) 333–62.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2006) ‘Virgil’s Ptolemaic relations’, Journal of Roman Studies 96: 25–41.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2009a) Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2009b) ‘Virgil: a paradoxical poet?’, in Hardie (2009a) 95–112.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (2014) The Last Trojan Hero. A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. London and New York.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (forthcoming) Classicism and Christianity in Late Antique Latin Poetry. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. and Moore, H. eds. (2010) Classical Literary Careers and their Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. and Powell, A. eds. (2017) The Ancient Lives of Virgil. Swansea.Google Scholar

Hardwick, L. and Stray, C. eds. (2007) A Companion to Classical Receptions. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1972–3) ‘Why did Venus wear boots? Some reflections on Aeneid 1.314f.’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 12: 10–25 = Hardie (1999) iv.59–75.Google Scholar

Harrison, E. L. (1989) ‘The tragedy of Dido’, Echos du monde classique 33: 1–21.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. ed. (1990) Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (1991) Vergil: Aeneid 10. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2007a) Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2007b) ‘The primal voyage and the ocean of epos’, Dictynna 4.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2010) ‘Sermones deorum: divine discourse in Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Dickey and Chahoud (2010) 266–78.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. W. (1967) ‘English Virgil: the Aeneid in the XVIII century’, Philologica Pragensia 10: 1–11, 80–91.Google Scholar

Haskell, Y. (2010) ‘Practicing what they preach? Vergil and the Jesuits’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 203–16.Google Scholar

Haskell, Y. (2014) ‘The passion(s) of Jesuit Latin’, in Ford, P., Bloemendal, J. and Fantazzi, C., eds., Brill’s Encyclopaedia of the Neo-Latin World, 775–88. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Haubold, J. (2000) Homer’s People. Epic Poetry and Social Formation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hawkins, P. S. (1991) ‘Dido, Beatrice and the signs of ancient love’, in Jacoff and Schnapp (1991) 113–30.Google Scholar

Haynes, K. (2010) ‘Classic Vergil’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 421–34.Google Scholar

Heaney, S. (1991) Seeing Things. London.Google Scholar

Heaney, S. (1995) The Redress of Poetry: Oxford Lectures. London and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Heaney, S. trans. (2016) Aeneid: Book VI. New York.Google Scholar

Heffernan, W. (1993) Museum of Words. Chicago.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1968) What is Called Thinking, trans. J. Glenn. New York.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1971) Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. A. Hofstadter. New York.Google Scholar

Heiden, B. (1987) ‘Laudes herculeae: suppressed savagery in the hymn to Hercules, Verg. A. 8.285–305’, American Journal of Philology 108: 661–71.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (1903) Vergils epische Technik, (3rd edn 1915; 4th edn 1957, Stuttgart). Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (1993) Vergil’s Epic Technique, trans. H. Harvey, D. Harvey, and F. Robertson. Bristol.Google Scholar

Hejduk, J. D. (2009) ‘Jupiter’s Aeneid: fama and imperium’, Classical Antiquity 28: 279–327.Google Scholar

Hejduk, J. D. (2017) ‘Happy Golden Anniversary, Harvard School!’, Classical World Special Issue 11: 1–137.Google Scholar

Helgerson, R. (1983) Self-Crowned Laureates: Spenser, Jonson, Milton and the Literary System. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Helgerson, R. (1992) Forms of Nationhood. Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc’h, J. (1984) ‘Auctoritas’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 1: 392–4. Rome.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1987) ‘Lucan/The word at war’, Ramus 16: 122–65.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2002) ‘Corny Copa: the motel muse’, in Spentzou and Fowler (2002) 253–78.Google Scholar

Henry, J. (1873–92) Aeneidea, or Critical, Exegetical, and Aesthetical Remarks on the Aeneid, 5 vols. London, Dublin, and Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Heraeus, W. (1930) ‘Drei Fragmente eines Grammatikers Ovidius Naso’, Rheinisches Museum 79: 391–405.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1991) ‘The Aeneid in Aeneid 3’ Vergilius 37: 69–76.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998) The Madness of Epic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heslin, P. (2015) The Museum of Augustus. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Heslin, P. (2016) ‘The dream of a universal variorum: digitizing the commentary tradition’, in Kraus and Stray (2016) 494–511.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. (2010) ‘On first looking into Vergil’s Homer’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 26–36.Google Scholar

Heyne, C. G. (1767–75) Publii Vergilii Maronis Opera varietate lectionis et perpetua adnotatione illustrata a C. G. Heyne, 4 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Heyne, C. G. and Wagner, G. P. E. (1830–41) P. Vergilius Maro varietate lectionis et perpetua adnotatione illustratus a C. G. Heyne. Editio quarta curavit G. P. E. Wagner, 4 vols. Leipzig and London.Google Scholar

Hillman, M. (2018) ‘Why so many men hate the Last Jedi but can’t agree on why’, Bitter Gertrude, https://bittergertrude.com/2018/01/04/why-so-many-men-hate-the-last-jedi-but-cant-agree-on-why/.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. E. (2017) ‘Pastoral and its futures: reading like (a) Mantuan’, Dictynna 14.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D. (1967) Validity in Interpretation. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Hlawitschka-Roth, E. (1998) Die uomini famosi der Sala di Udienza im Palazzo Comunale zu Lucignano. Neuried.Google Scholar

Holland, L. A. (1935) ‘Place names and heroes in the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 56: 202–15.Google Scholar

Hollander, J. (1988) ‘The poetics of ecphrasis’, Word & Image 4: 209–18.Google Scholar

Holzberg, N. (2004) ‘Impersonating the young Virgil: the author of the Catalepton and his libellus’, Materiali e discussioni 52: 29–40.Google Scholar

Holzberg, N. (2005) Die Appendix Vergiliana: Pseudepigraphen im literarischen Kontext. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Hopkinson, N. M. (1988) A Hellenistic Anthology. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1971) ‘Numanus Remulus: ethnography and propaganda in Aeneid 9: 598ff’ = Harrison (1990) 305–15.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1974) ‘Virgil’s Roman chronography: a reconsideration’, Classical Quarterly 68: 111–15.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1981) ‘Virgil and the conquest of chaos’, Antichthon 15:141–50 = Harrison (1990) 466–77.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1987) ‘Myth and mythography at Rome’, in Bremmer, J. N. and Horsfall, N. M., Roman Myth and Mythography, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Suppl. 52: 1–11. London.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1988) ‘Camilla o i limiti dell’invenzione’, Athenaeum 66: 31–51.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1991) Review of P. Brugisser, Romulus-Servianus, Classical Review 41: 242–3.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (1993) ‘Cleaning up Calpurnius’, Classical Review 43: 267–70.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2000a) Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2000b) A Companion to the Study of Virgil, 2nd edn. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2001) ‘The Moretum decomposed’, Classica et mediaevalia 52: 308–18.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2003) Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2006) Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2008) Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2013) Virgil, Aeneid 6: A Commentary. Berlin and Boston, MAGoogle Scholar

Horsfall, N. M. (2016) The Epic Distilled. Studies in the Composition of the Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Höschele, R. (2005) ‘Moreto-Poetik: Das Moretum als intertextuelles Mischgericht’, in Holzberg (2005) 244–69.Google Scholar

Höschele, R. (2013) ‘From Ecloga to mime to Vergil’s Eclogues as mimes: ein Gedankenspiel’, Vergilius 59: 37–60.Google Scholar

Houghton, L. B. T. (2003) ‘A fresco portrait of Virgil at Lucignano’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 66: 1–28.Google Scholar

Houghton, L. B. T. (2015) ‘Virgil’s fourth Eclogue and the visual arts’, Papers of the British School at Rome 83: 175–220.Google Scholar

Houghton, L. B. T. (forthcoming) Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue in the Italian Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Houghton, L. B. T. and Sgarbi, M. eds. (2018) Virgil and Renaissance Culture. Tempe.Google Scholar

Hoyle, H. (2015) ‘Re-reading, re-mapping, re-weaving: towards a theory of feminist reader response to Virgil’s Aeneid in Ursula Le Guin’s Lavinia’, diss. Bristol.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1988) ‘“Short on heroics”: Jason in the Argonautica’, Classical Quarterly 38: 436–53.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1989) Apollonius of Rhodes. Argonautica. Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2004) ‘Homer and Greek literature’, in Fowler (2004) 235–53.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2014) Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2018) The Measure of Homer: The Ancient Reception of the Iliad and the Odyssey. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Huysmans, J.-K. (1884) À rebours. Paris.Google Scholar

Huysmans, J.-K. (1931) Against Nature, trans. H. Ellis. London.Google Scholar

Innes, D. C., Hine, H., and Pelling, C. eds. (1995) Ethics and Rhetoric: Essays for Donald Russell on his 75th Birthday. Oxford.Google Scholar

Iodice, M. G. ed. (2002) Appendix Vergiliana. Milan.Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1993) The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Jackson Knight, W. F. (1966 [1944]) Roman Vergil, 3rd edn. London.Google Scholar

Jacoff, R. ed. (1993) The Cambridge Companion to Dante. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jacoff, R. and Schnapp, J. T. eds. (1991) The Poetry of Allusion: Virgil and Ovid in Dante’s Commedia. Stanford.Google Scholar

James, H. (1997) Shakespeare’s Troy. Drama, Politics, and the Translation of Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Janka, M. (2005) ‘Prolusio oder Posttext? Zum intertextuellen Stammbaum des hypervergilischen Culex’, in Holzberg (2005) 28–67.Google Scholar

Janko, R. (1995) ‘Reconstructing Philodemus’ On Poems’, in Obbink (1995) 69–96.Google Scholar

Jansen, L. ed. (2014) The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jenkyns, R. (1989) ‘Virgil and Arcadia’, Journal of Roman Studies 79: 26–39.Google Scholar

Jenkyns, R. (1992) The Legacy of Rome: A New Appraisal. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jenkyns, R. (1993) ‘Labor improbus’, Classical Quarterly 43: 243–8 = Hardie (1999) ii.154–61 = Volk (2008b) 128–37.Google Scholar

Jenkyns, R. (1998) Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History, Times, Names, and Places. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jeunet-Mancy, E. ed. (2012) Servius: Commentaire sur l’Enéide de Virgile. Livre VI. Paris.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1979) ‘Vergilius cacozelus (Donatus Vita Vergilii 44)’, in Cairns, F., ed., Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, ii.67–141. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Jockers, M. (2013) Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Champaign.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. (2006) The Lives of the Most Eminent English Poets; With Critical Observations on their Works, ed. Lonsdale, R. Oxford.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1976) Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil’s Aeneid. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. (1980) Vergil’s Agricultural Golden Age. A Study of the Georgics, Mnemosyne Suppl. 60. Leiden.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1978) The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Jones, J. W. (1961) ‘Allegorical interpretation in Servius’, Classical Journal 56: 217–26.Google Scholar

Jones, J. W. and Jones, E. F. eds. (1977) The Commentary on the First Six Books of the Aeneid of Virgil Commonly Attributed to Bernardus Silvestris. Lincoln.Google Scholar

Jones, R. and Penny, N. (1983) Raphael. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Joseph, T. A. (2012) Tacitus the Epic Successor: Virgil, Lucan, and the Narrative of the Civil War in the Histories. Mnemosyne Suppl. 345. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Josipovici, G. (1980) Vergil Dying. Windsor.Google Scholar

Joyal, M., McDougall, I., and Yardley, J. eds. (2009) Greek and Roman Education: A Sourcebook. London and New York.Google Scholar

Joyner, D. B. (2008) ‘Virgilian images’, in Ziolkowski and Putnam (2008) 427–63.Google Scholar

Joyner, D. B. (2014a) ‘Medieval art’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) ii.798–802.Google Scholar

Joyner, D. B. (2014b) ‘Virgil, portraits of’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) iii.1351–60.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. ed. (1993) Vergil. The Classical Heritage, vol. ii. New York and London.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. (1994) ‘Philology, the reader, and the Nachleben of classical texts’, Modern Philology 92: 137–56.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. (2001) ‘The Aeneid transformed: illustration as interpretation from the Renaissance to the present’, in Spence, S., ed., Poets and Critics Read Virgil, 121–48. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. (2007a) The Other Virgil: Pessimistic Readings of the Aeneid in Early Modern Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. (2007b) A Companion to the Classical Tradition. Malden, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. (2009) A Catalogue of the Junius Spencer Morgan Collection of Virgil in the Princeton University Library. New Castle, DE.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. (2012) A Bibliography of the Early Printed Editions of Virgil, 1469–1850. New Castle, DE.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. (2015) The Protean Virgil: Material Form and the Reception of the Classics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kania, R. (2016a) Virgil’s Eclogues and the Art of Fiction: A Study of the Poetic Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kania, R. (2016b) ‘Unbounded views: incomplete ecphrasis and the visual imagination in Virgil’, Ramus 45: 74–101.Google Scholar

Karterouli, K. (2014) ‘Late antique art’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) ii.721–4.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. (2014) ‘Claudius Donatus’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) i.271.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1980) ‘Macrobius and Servius: verecundia and the grammarian’s function’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 84: 219–62.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1988) Guardians of Language. The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (1995) Suetonius: De grammaticis et rhetoribus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2011) Macrobius: Saturnalia, 3 vols. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar

Katz, J. T. (2008) ‘Virgil translates Aratus: Phaenomena 1–2 and Georgics 1.1–2’, Materiali e discussioni 60: 105–23.Google Scholar

Kauffmann, H. (1965) ‘Die “Aeneas- und Anchises”-Gruppe von Gianlorenzo Bernini (1598–1680) in der Galleria Borghese’, in Studien zur Geschichte der europäischen Plastik. Festschrift für Theodor Müller, 281–91. Munich.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, H. (2017) ‘Intertextuality in late Latin poetry’, in Elsner and Hernández Lobato (2017) 149–75.Google Scholar

Kayachev, B. (2011) ‘Ille ego qui quondam: genre, date, and authorship’, Vergilius 57: 75–82.Google Scholar

Kayachev, B. (2016a) ‘Catalepton 9 and Hellenistic poetry’, Classical Quarterly 66: 180–204.Google Scholar

Kayachev, B. (2016b) Allusion and Allegory: Studies in the Ciris. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Keane, C. (2011) ‘Lessons in reading: Horace on Homer at Epistles 1.2.1–31’, Classical World, 104: 427–50.Google Scholar

Keeline, T. (2013) ‘Did (Servius’s) Virgil nod?’, Vergilius 59: 61–80.Google Scholar

Keeline, T. (2017) ‘A poet on the margins: Vergil and the Theocritean scholia’, Classical Philology 112: 456–78.Google Scholar

Keith, A. M. (2000) Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kelly, C. (2006) The Roman Empire: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1982) ‘Gallus and the Culex’, Classical Quarterly 32: 371–89.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1983) ‘Shades of meaning. Virgil, Ecl. 10.75–77’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 8: 124.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1987) ‘Arcades ambo: Virgil, Gallus and Arcadia’, Hermathena 143: 47–59.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1992) ‘“Augustan” and “anti-Augustan”: reflections on terms of reference’, in Powell (1992) 26–58.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2013) Antiquity and the Meanings of Time: A Philosophy of Ancient and Modern Literature. London.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1973) ‘The style of the Metamorphoses’, in Binns, J. W., ed., Ovid, 116–53. London.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1984) Moretum: The Ploughman’s Lunch: A Poem Ascribed to Virgil. Bristol.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (2002) ‘Ovid’s language and style’, in Boyd, B. W., ed., Brill’s Companion to Ovid, 27–89. Leiden.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (2007) ‘Lucretian texture: style, metre and rhetoric in the De rerum natura’, in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, 92–110. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. eds. (1982) The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. ii: Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1966) The Sense of an Ending. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1968) ‘A Babylonish dialect’, in Cox, C. B. and Hinchcliffe, A. P., eds., T. S. Eliot: The Waste Land. A Casebook, 224–35. London.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1975/1983) The Classic: Literary Images of Permanence and Change. London.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1988) History and Value. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1990) Poetry, Narrative, History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Kienast, D. (2014) Augustus: Prinzeps und Monarch, 5th edn. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

King, K. C. (1982) ‘Foil and fusion: Homer’s Achilles in Vergil’s Aeneid’, Materiali e discussioni 9: 31–57.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S. ed. (1985) The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume I: books 1–4. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kivilo, M. (2010) Early Greek Poets’ Lives: The Shaping of the Tradition. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Klein, F. (2017) ‘Vergil’s “Posidippeanism”? The Ἀνδριαντοποιικά in Georgics 4 and Statius’ Siluae’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 109: 353–75.Google Scholar

Klein, T. M. (1978) ‘The Greek shepherd in Vergil, Gide, Genet and Barthes’, Helios 6: 1–32.Google Scholar

Kleinbub, C. K. (2012) ‘Raphael’s Quos Ego: forgotten document of the Renaissance paragone’, Word & Image 28: 287–301.Google Scholar

Klingner, F. ed. (1967) Virgil: Bucolica, Georgica, Aeneis. Zurich and Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Knauer, G. N. (1964a) Die Aeneis und Homer. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Knauer, G. N. (1964b) ‘Vergil’s Aeneid and Homer’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 5: 61–84 = Harrison (1990) 390–412 = Hardie (1999) iii.93–113.Google Scholar

Knox, B. M. W. (1950) ‘The serpent and the flame: the imagery of the second book of the Aeneid’, American Journal of Philology 71: 379–400 = Commager (1966) 124–42 = Hardie (1999) iii.345–62.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (1986) Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Knox, P. E. (2017) ‘In today’s anti-immigrant rhetoric, echoes of Virgil’s Aeneid’, The Conversation, 21 March 2017, https://theconversation.com/in-todays-anti-immigrant-rhetoric-echoes-of-virgils-aeneid-74738.Google Scholar

Koch, G. F. (1959) ‘Virgil im Korbe’, in Gramberg, W., ed., Festschrift für Erich Meyer zum 60. Geburtstag, 29 Oktober 1957. Studien zu Werken in den Sammlungen des Museums für Kunst und Gewerbe, Hamburg, 105–21. Hamburg.Google Scholar

Kohn, T. D. (2000) ‘An early stage in Vergil’s career’, Classical World 93: 267–74.Google Scholar

König, A. (1970) Die Aeneis und die griechische Tragödie: Studien zur imitatio Technik Vergils. Berlin.Google Scholar

Kopff, E. C. (1981) ‘Vergil and the cyclic epics’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 31.2: 919–47.Google Scholar

Kraggerud, E. (2017) Vergiliana. Critical Studies on the Texts of Publius Vergilius Maro. London and New York.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. and Stray, C. eds. (2016) Classical Commentaries. Explorations in a Scholarly Genre. Oxford.Google Scholar

Krevans, N. (2010) ‘Bookburning and the poetic deathbed’, in Hardie and Moore (2010) 197–208.Google Scholar

Krieger, M. (1992) Ekphrasis. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Kromer, G. (1979) ‘Didactic tradition in Vergil’s Georgics’, in Boyle (1979) 7–21.Google Scholar

Kronenberg, L. (2009) Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro and Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar

La Cerda, J. L. de (1608) P. Virgilij Maronis Bucolica et Georgica Argumentis, Explicationibus, et Notis illustrata a Ioanne Ludovico de la Cerda Toletano e Societate Iesu. Madrid.Google Scholar

La Cerda, J. L. de (1612) P. Virgilii Maronis priores sex libri Aeneidos argumentis, explicationibus notis illustrati, auctore Ioanne Ludovico de la Cerda Toletano Societatis Iesu … Lyons.Google Scholar

La Cerda, J. L. de (1617) P. Virgilii Maronis posteriores sex libri Aeneidos argumentis, explicationibus notis illustrati, auctore Ioanne Ludovico de la Cerda Toletano Societatis Iesu …. Lyons.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (1962) ‘Esiodo nella cultura e nella poesia di Virgilio’, in Hésiode et son influence. Entretiens Fondation Hardt 7, 213–70. Vandoeuvres = La Penna (1999).Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (1967) ‘Sul cosiddetto stile soggettivo e sul cosiddetto simbolismo di Virgilio’ Dialoghi di archeologia 1: 220–44.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (1979) ‘Funzione e interpretazioni del mito nella tragedia arcaica latina’, in Fra teatro, poesia e politica romana, 49–104. Turin.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (1980) ‘Mezenzio: una tragedia della tirannia e del titanismo antico’, Maia 32: 3–30 = ‘Mezentius: a tragedy of tyranny and of ancient titanism’, in Hardie (1999) iv.345–76.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (1985) ‘Ille ego qui quondam e i raccordi editoriali nell’ antichità’, Studi italiani de filologia classica 3: 76–91.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (1999) ‘Hesiod in the culture and poetry of Virgil’, in Hardie (1999) ii.25–40.Google Scholar

La Penna, A. (2002) ‘La collana di Armonia e il balteo di Pallante: una nota su Virgilio e Accio’, Maia 54: 259–62.Google Scholar

Labate, M. (2009) ‘In search of the lost Hercules: strategies of the fantastic in the Aeneid’, in Hardie (2009a) 12–44.Google Scholar

Labate, M. and Rosati, G. eds. (2013) La costruzione del mito augusteo. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Lada-Richards, I. (2006) ‘Cum femina primum …: Venus, Vulcan and the politics of male mollitia in Aeneid 8’, Helios 33: 27–72.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (1993) ‘Sounding out ecphrasis: art and text in Catullus 64’, Journal of Roman Studies 83: 18–30.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (1997) ‘Approaching characterisation in Virgil’, in Martindale (1997) 282–93.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (1999) Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power. Speech Presentation and Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (2002) ‘Juan Luis De La Cerda, Virgil, and the predicament of commentary’, in Gibson and Kraus (2002) 171–203.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (2006) The Epic of America: An Introduction to Rafael Landívar and the Rusticatio Mexicana. London.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (2007) ‘The Virgin of Guadalupe and the birth of Mexican epic: Bernardo Ceinos de Riofrío’s Centonicum virgilianum monimentum 1680’, in Andrews, J. and Coroleu, A., eds., Mexico 1680: Cultural and Intellectual Life in the Barroco Indias, 199–220. Bristol.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (2009) ‘Virgil: reception and the myth of biography’, CentoPagine 3: 1–9.Google Scholar

Laird, A. (2010) ‘The cosmic race and a heap of broken images: Mexico’s classical past and the modern creole imagination’, in Vasunia and Stephens (2010) 163–81.Google Scholar

Lamacchia, R. (1984) ‘Cento’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 1: 734–7. Rome.Google Scholar

Lambert, G. (2004) The Return of the Baroque in Modern Culture. New York and London.Google Scholar

Lambert, P.-Y. (1986) ‘Les gloses celtiques aux commentaires de Virgile’, Études celtiques 23: 81–128.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. eds. (1992) Homer’s Ancient Readers. Princeton.Google Scholar

Lana, I. (1958–9) ‘L’Atreo di Accio e la leggenda di Atreo e Tieste nel teatro tragico romano’, Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 93: 291–385.Google Scholar

Lang, A. (1889) Letters on Literature. London.Google Scholar

Langmuir, E. (1976) ‘Arma virumque … Nicolò dell’Abate’s Aeneid gabinetto for Scandiano’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 39: 151–70.Google Scholar

Lattimore, R. trans. (2011) The Iliad of Homer. With a New Introduction and Notes by Richard Martin. Chicago.Google Scholar

Laugesen, A. T. (1962) ‘La roue de Virgile. Une page de la théorie littéraire du moyen âge’, Classica et mediaevalia 23: 248–73.Google Scholar

Lausberg, M. (1983) ‘Iliadisches im ersten Buch der Aeneis’, Gymnasium 90: 206–39.Google Scholar

Lazzarini, C. (1984) ‘Historia/fabula: forme della costruzione poetica virgiliana nel commento di Servio all’Eneide’, Materiali e discussioni 12: 117–44.Google Scholar

Lazzarini, C. (1989) ‘Elementi di una poetica serviana’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 82: 56–109, 240–60.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1974) Vergil’s Eclogues: Landscapes of Experience. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1981) ‘Georgics 2 and the poem’, Arethusa 14: 35–48.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1982) ‘Illustration as interpretation in Brant’s and Dryden’s editions of Vergil’, in Hindman, S., ed., The Early Illustrated Book: Essays in Honor of Lessing J. Rosenwald, 175–210. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1988) The Rhetoric of Space. Princeton.Google Scholar

Leach, E. W. (1997) ‘Venus, Thetis and the social construction of maternal behavior’, Classical Journal 92: 347–71.Google Scholar

Lee, G. ed. and trans. (1984) Virgil: The Eclogues, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Lee, R. W. (1967) Ut pictura poesis. The Humanistic Theory of Painting. New York.Google Scholar

Leech, G. N. and Short, M. H. (1981) Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London and New York.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1976) Der Thyestes des Lucius Varius Rufus. Zehn Überlegungen zu seiner Rekonstruktion. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1978) Dido und Aias. Ein Beitrag zur römischen Tragödie. Mainz.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R. (2012) The Lives of the Greek Poets. Baltimore and London (1st edn 1981).Google Scholar

Leidl, C. G. (1993) ‘Der Seher Vergil: Von Ludger tom Ring d. Ä. (1496–1547)’, in Holzberg, N. and Maier, F., eds., Ut Poesis Pictura: Antike Texte in Bildern, 2 vols., ii.29–40. Bamberg.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1996) ‘Varius Rufus, Thyestes and the appetites of Antony, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 42: 171–97.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (2016) ‘Vergil’s second Eclogue and the class struggle’, Classical Philology 111: 406–33.Google Scholar

Leinsle, U. G. (2009) ‘Jacobus Pontanus SJ (1542–1626). Humanismus und pietas in der Spätrenaissance’, in Eder, M. and Landersdorfer, A., eds., Christen in Bayern – Christen aus Bayern. Biographische Aspekte und Perspektiven aus 15 Jahrhunderten. Festschrift Karl Hausberger zum 65. Geburtstag, 81–99. Regensburg.Google Scholar

Lembke, J. (2005) Virgil’s Georgics. New Haven.Google Scholar

Levene, D. S. and Nelis, D. P. eds. (2002) Clio and the Poets. Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Levey, M. (1957) ‘Tiepolo’s treatment of a classical story at Villa Valmarana. A study in eighteenth-century iconography and aesthetics’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 20: 298–317.Google Scholar

Levitan, W. (1993) ‘Give up the beginning? Juno’s mindful wrath (Aeneid 1.37)’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 18: 14.Google Scholar

Levy, H. L. (1969) ‘To hexês in Homeric scholia and Servius’ ordo’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 100: 237–54.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S. (1955) Surprised by Joy. London.Google Scholar

Lightbown, R. (1978) Samuel Palmer, A Vision Recaptured: The Complete Etchings and the Paintings for Milton and for Virgil. London.Google Scholar

Lipka, M. (2001) Language in Virgil’s Eclogues. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Lipking, L. (1981) The Life of the Poet. Beginning and Ending Poetic Careers. Chicago.Google Scholar

Lipking, L. (2010) ‘Epilogue: inventing a life – a personal view of literary careers’, in Hardie and Moore (2010) 287–99.Google Scholar

Liu, J. (2015) ‘Virgil in China in the twentieth century’, Sino-American Journal of Comparative Literature 1: 67–105.Google Scholar

Liversidge, M. J. H. (1997) ‘Virgil in art’, in Martindale (1997) 91–103.Google Scholar

Llewellyn, N. (1984) ‘Virgil and the visual arts’, in Martindale (1984) 117–40.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. J. (1983) Supplementum Hellenisticum. New York.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lord, M. L. (1982) ‘Petrarch and Vergil’s First Eclogue: the Codex Ambrosianus’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 86: 253–76.Google Scholar

Lorenz, S. (2005) ‘Invideo vobis, agri: mea gaudia habetis: bukolische Verwünschungen und elegische Eifersucht in den Dirae’, in Holzberg (2005) 1–27.Google Scholar

Loughrey, B. ed. (1984) The Pastoral Mode: A Casebook. London and Basingstoke.Google Scholar

Lovatt, H. (2013) The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender and Narrative in Ancient Epic, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Low, A. (1985) The Georgic Revolution. Princeton.Google Scholar

Lowe, N. (2000) The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lucarini, C. M. and Fassina, A. eds. (2015) Cento Vergilianus. Faltonia Betitia Proba. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Lucas, D. W. ed. (1968) Aristotle, Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lunelli, A. ed. (1988) La Lingua Poetica Latina, 3rd edn. Bologna.Google Scholar

Lunelli, A. (2014) ‘Leto, Giulio Pomponio’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) ii.743–4.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. (2001) Ovid’s Changing Worlds: English Metamorphoses, 1567–1632. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1971) ‘The dating of the Ciris’, Classical Quarterly 21: 233–53.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1974) ‘Scilicet et tempus ueniet … Virgil, Georgics, 1.463–514’, in West, D. and Woodman, T., eds., Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry, 47–66. Cambridge = Hardie (1999) ii.162–83 = Lyne (2007) 38–59.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1978) Ciris: A Poem Attributed to Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1983) ‘Lavinia’s blush: Vergil, Aeneid, 12 64–70’, Greece & Rome 30: 55–64 = Lyne (2007) 136–45.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987) Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1989) Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1995) Horace: Behind the Public Poetry. New Haven.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (2007) Collected Papers on Latin Poetry, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2009) ‘Tragedy and the Dionysiac in Virgil’s Aeneid’, diss. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2013a) ‘Virgil’s Bacchus and the Roman republic’, in Farrell and Nelis (2013) 124–45.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2013b) ‘The Shepherds Jubilee: a Dublin eclogue from 1701’, Vergilius 59: 81–110.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2018) ‘Untitled/Arma virumque’, Classical Philology 113: 423–48.Google Scholar

McAuley, M. (2016) Reproducing Rome: Motherhood in Virgil, Ovid, Seneca and Statius. Oxford.Google Scholar

MacCormack, S. (1998) The Shadows of Poetry: Vergil in the Mind of Augustine. Berkeley.Google Scholar

McGill, S. (2005) Virgil Recomposed: The Mythological and Secular Centos in Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar

McGill, S. trans. (2016) Juvencus’ Four Books of the Gospels. Abingdon and New York.Google Scholar

McGill, S. and Pucci, J. eds. (2016) Classics Renewed. Reception and Innovation in the Latin Poetry of Late Antiquity. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

McHam, S. B. (2005) ‘Renaissance monuments to favourite sons’, Renaissance Studies 19: 458–86.Google Scholar

Mack, M. and deForest Lord, G. eds. (1982) Poetic Traditions of the English Renaissance. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Mackail, J. W. ed. (1930) Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

McKay, A. G. (1969) ‘Virgilian landscape into art: Poussin, Claude and Turner’, in Dudley, D. R., ed., Virgil, 139–60. London.Google Scholar

McKay, A. G. (1982) ‘Vergil translated into European Art’, Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, ser. 4, 20: 339–56.Google Scholar

McKay, A. G. (1987) ‘Book illustrations of Vergil’s Aeneid ad 400–1980’, Augustan Age 6: 227–37.Google Scholar

Mackay, L. A. (1957) ‘Achilles as model for Aeneas’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 88: 11–16 = Hardie (1999) iii.87–92.Google Scholar

Makowski, J. F. (1989) ‘Nisus and Euryalus: a Platonic relationship’, Classical Journal 85: 1–15Google Scholar

Mâle, E. (1932) ‘Virgile dans l’art du moyen âge français’, Studi medievali 5: 325–31Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (1991) A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Leeds.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (2016) ‘Homer in Servius: a judgement on Servius as a commentator on Virgil’, in Efstathiou and Karamanou (2016) 303–14.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, A. trans. (1971) The Aeneid of Virgil: A Verse Translation. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Mann, N. (2004) Pétrarque: Les voyages de l’esprit. Grenoble.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2011) Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mariotti, S. (1951) ‘La Ciris è un falso intenzionale’, Humanitas 3: 371–3.Google Scholar

Maritz, J. (1989) ‘Towards a Zimbabwean Aeneid: a pedagogical exercise’, Zambezia 16: 151–7.Google Scholar

Markey, T. (2016) ‘Servius illustrated: Latin texts and contexts of Simone Martini’s frontispiece painting to Petrarch’s Virgil’, Humanistica Lovaniensia 65: 1–28.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J. eds. (2013) The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1940) ‘Virgile linguiste’, in Mélanges de philologie et de littérature anciennes offerts à Alfred Ernout, 259–65. Paris.Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1949) Quelques aspects de la formation du Latin littéraire. Paris.Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1962) Traité de stylistique latine, 4th edn. Paris.Google Scholar

Marrou, H. I. (1956) A History of Education in Antiquity, trans. G. Lamb. London.Google Scholar

Martelli, F. (2013) Ovid’s Revisions: The Editor as Author. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. A. ed. (1984) Virgil and his Influence. Bristol.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. A. (1993a) Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. A. (1993b) ‘Descent into Hell: reading ambiguity, or Virgil and the critics’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 21: 111–50 = Hardie (1999) iii.14–48.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. A. (1996) ‘Ruins of Rome: T. S. Eliot and the presence of the past’, Arion 3rd series 3: 102–40.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. A. (1997) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. A. (2005) Latin Poetry and the Judgement of Taste. An Essay in Aesthetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. A. (2017) ‘English Virgil? – From Surrey to Tennyson’, in Mack, P. and North, J., eds., The Afterlife of Virgil, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 136, 137–53. London.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. and Thomas, R. F. (2006) Classics and the Uses of Reception, Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Martinez, J. ed. (2014) Fakes and Forgers of Classical Literature: Ergo decipiatur! Leiden.Google Scholar

Masters, J. (1992) Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Masters, J. (1994) ‘Deceiving the reader: the political mission of Lucan Bellum civile 7’, in Elsner and Masters (1994) 151–77.Google Scholar

May, T. trans. (1628) Virgil’s Georgicks Englished. London.Google Scholar

Mayer, K. (2002) ‘The golden line: ancient and medieval lists of special hexameters and modern scholarship’, in Lanham, C. D., ed., Latin Grammar and Rhetoric: Classical Theory and Modern Practice, 139–79. London.Google Scholar

Mayor, J. B., Warde Fowler, W., and Conway, R. S. eds. (1907) Virgil’s Messianic Eclogue, its Meaning, Occasion and Sources. London.Google Scholar

Mazzocchi, G. (1993) ‘Los comentarios virgilianos del Padre Juan Luis de la Cerda’, in García Martín, M., ed., Estado actual de los estudios sobre el Siglo de Oro (Actas II Congreso AISO), 663–75. Salamanca.Google Scholar

Mead, R. (2014) ‘The scourge of relatability’, The New Yorker, 1 August 2014.Google Scholar

Meadows, D. (2011) ‘Latin intelligence?’ Rogueclassicist.com, 20 January 2011, https://rogueclassicism.com/2011/01/20/latin-intelligence/.Google Scholar

Medcalf, S. (1972) ‘Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Daiches and Thorlby (1972) 287–326.Google Scholar

Merkle, S. (2005) ‘Copa docta’, in Holzberg (2005) 91–115.Google Scholar

Merriam, C. U. (2002) ‘Storm warning: Ascanius’ appearances in the Aeneid’, Latomus 61: 852–60.Google Scholar

Michalopoulos, C. N. (2016) ‘“tollite me, Teucri” (Verg. Aen. 3.601): saving Achaemenides, saving Homer’, in Efstathiou and Karamanou (2016) 263–75.Google Scholar

Miles, B. (2011) Heroic Saga and Classical Epic in Medieval Ireland. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Miles, G. B. (1975) ‘Georgics 3.209–294: Amor and civilisation’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 8: 177–97.Google Scholar

Miles, G. B. (1980) Virgil’s Georgics: A New Interpretation. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Miller, F. and Segal, E. eds. (1984) Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford.Google Scholar

Miller, J. F. (2009) Apollo, Augustus and the Poets. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Milne, A. A. (1926) Winnie-the-Pooh. London.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. (2014) Grafitti and the Literary Landscape in Roman Pompeii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. N. (1991) ‘The violence of virginity in the Aeneid’, Arethusa 24: 219–38.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. (1993) ‘Committing philosophy on the reader: didactic coercion and reader autonomy in De Rerum Natura’, in Schiesaro et al. (1993) 111–28.Google Scholar

Mitsis, P. and Ziogas, I. eds. (2016) Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1983) ‘Fate, Apollo, and M. Junius Brutus’, American Journal of Philology 104, 249–56.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1984) ‘Aristotle and Dido’s hamartia’, Greece & Rome 31: 48–63.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (2017) ‘Romane, memento: Antisthenes, Dio and Virgil on the education of the strong’, in Woodman and Wisse (2017) 105–30.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1960) Secondo contributo alla storia degli studi classici. Rome.Google Scholar

Montagu, J. (1998) ‘“Ut poesis pictura”? Dido and the artists’, in Burden (1998) 131–49.Google Scholar

Montana, F. (2015) ‘Hellenistic scholarship’, in Montanari, F., Mattaios, S. and Rengakos, A., eds., Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, i.60–183. Leiden.Google Scholar

Montiglio, S. (2011) From Villain to Hero: Odysseus in Ancient Thought. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Montrose, L. A. (1983) ‘Of gentlemen and shepherds: the politics of Elizabethan pastoral form’, English Literary History 50: 415–59.Google Scholar

Moretti, F. (2013) Distant Reading. London.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1998) ‘Assimilation and civil war: Hercules and Cacus: Aeneid 8’, in Stahl, H.-P., ed., Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, 175–98, London.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1999) Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s Georgics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (2010) Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse. Oxford.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. (1998) Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morris, W. trans. (1876) The Aeneids of Virgil. London.Google Scholar

Morrison, J. K. (1992) ‘Apollonio di Giovanni’s Aeneid cassoni and the Virgil Commentators’, Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin 26–47.Google Scholar

Mortimer, R. (1986) ‘Vergil in the light of the sixteenth century: selected illustrations’, in Bernard (1986) 159–84.Google Scholar

Moskalew, W. (1982) Formular Language and Poetic Design in the Aeneid. Leiden.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (1987) ‘The “Virgilian” Culex’, in Whitby et al. (1987) 199–209.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (2010) ‘Laocoons’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 325–40.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. (2018) ‘Homer in Greek culture, from the archaic to the Hellenistic period’, in Mutschler, F.-H., ed., The Homeric Epics and the Chinese Book of Songs: Foundational Texts Compared, 163–84. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mountford, J. F. and Schultz, J. T. (1930) Index Rerum et Nominum in Scholiis Servii et Aelii Donati Tractatorum. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Mühmelt, M. (1965) Griechische Grammatik in der Vergilerklärung. Munich.Google Scholar

Muratori, L. A. (1706) Della perfetta poesia italiana, 2 vols. Modena.Google Scholar

Murgatroyd, P. ed. (1994) Tibullus Elegies II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (1988) ‘Aen. 9.236 – an unrecognized Vergilian variation’, Hermes 116: 493–8.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (2003) ‘The dating of Servius revisited’, Classical Philology 98: 45–70.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (2004) ‘The truth about Vergil’s commentators’, in Rees (2004) 189–200.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. (2014) ‘Servius, manuscripts of’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) iii.1154–7.Google Scholar

Murgia, C. E. and Kaster, R. A. eds. (2018) Serviani in Vergili Aeneidos Libros IX-XII Commentarii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Murray, O. (1965) ‘Philodemus on the good king according to Homer’, Journal of Roman Studies 55, 161–82.Google Scholar

Muse, K. (2005) ‘“Don’t dally in this valley”: wordplay in Odyssey 15.10 and Aeneid 4.271’, Classical Quarterly 55: 646–9.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. ed. (1990) Virgil: Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Naecke, A. F. (1842) Opuscula philologica, vol. i. Bonn.Google Scholar

Nagle, B. R. (1983) ‘Open-ended closure in Aeneid’, Classical World 76: 257–63.Google Scholar

Nakata, S. (2012) ‘Egredere o quicumque es: genealogical opportunism and Trojan identity in the Aeneid’, Phoenix 66: 335–63.Google Scholar

Nappa, C. (2005) Reading after Actium: Vergil’s Georgics, Octavian and Rome. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Nascimbeni, N. (1577) Lamberti Hortensii Montfortii Enarrationes doctiss. atque utiliss. in XII libros P. Virgilii Maronis Aeneidos. His accessit: Nascimbaeni Nascimbaenii in priorem P. Virgilii Maronis epopoeiae partem, id est, in sex primos Aeneidos libros erudita admodum & perelegans Explanatio … Basel.Google Scholar

Nascimento, A. A. and Díaz de Bustamente, J. M. eds. (1984) Nicolas Trivet Anglico, Comentario a las Bucolicas de Virgilio. Estudio y edición critica. Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar

Ndalianis, A. (2004) (Neo)Baroque Aesthetics and Contemporary Entertainment. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Nees, L. (1978) ‘Le Quos Ego de Marc-Antoine Raimondi: l’adaption d’une source antique par Raphael’, Nouvelles de l’Estampe 40–41: 18–29.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. P. (2001) Virgil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Leeds.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. P. (2010) ‘Vergil’s library’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 13–25.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. P., Forstall, C. and Galli Milić, L. (2017) ‘Intertextuality and narrative context: digital narratology?’ https://hal-01480773.Google Scholar

Nelsestuen, G. N. (2016) ‘Numanus Remulus, Ascanius, and Cato’s Origines: the rhetoric of ethnicity in Aeneid 9’, Vergilius 62: 24–43.Google Scholar

Newman, J. K. (2002) ‘Hercules in the Aeneid: the dementia of power’, in Defosse, P., ed., Hommages à Carl Deroux. I: Poésie, 398–411. Brussels.Google Scholar

Ní Mheallaigh, K. (2008) ‘Pseudo-documentarism and the limits of ancient fiction’, American Journal of Philology 129: 403–31.Google Scholar

Nicolet, C. (1976) Le métier de citoyen dans la Rome républicaine. Paris.Google Scholar

Niehl, R. (2002) Vergils Vergil: Selbtzitat und Selbstdeutung in der Aeneis: Ein Kommentar und Interpretation. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (1978) ‘Virgil’s Fourth Eclogue: Easterners and Westerners’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 25: 59–78 = Nisbet (1995) 47–75 = Hardie (1999) i.256–82 = Volk (2008a) 155–88.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (1978–9) ‘Aeneas imperator: Roman generalship in an epic context’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 17: 50–61 = Harrison (1990) 378–80 = Nisbet (1995) 132–43 = Hardie (1999) iii.254–64.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (1991) ‘The style of Virgil’s Eclogues’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 20: 1–14 = Nisbet (1995) 325–47 = Volk (2008a) 48–63.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. (1995) Collected Papers on Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. eds. (1978) A Commentary on Horace Odes Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nishimura-Jensen, J. (1996) ‘Tragic epic or epic tragedy: narrative and genre in Apollonius of Rhodes’ Argonautica’, diss. Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1915) Ennius and Vergilius. Kriegsbilder aus Roms grosser Zeit. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1981 [1903]) P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI, 7th edn. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Nugent, S. G. (1992) ‘Vergil’s “voice of the women” in Aeneid V’, Arethusa 25: 255–92.Google Scholar

Nuttall, A. D. (1992) Openings: Narrative Beginnings from the Epic to the Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar

O’Brien, E. (2015) The Commentaries of Pope Pius II (1458–1464) and the Crisis of the Fifteenth-Century Papacy. Toronto, Buffalo, and London.Google Scholar

O’Daly, G. (1999) Augustine’s City of God: A Reader’s Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (1990) Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (1993) ‘Dido as “interpreting character” in Aeneid 4.56–66’, Arethusa 26: 99–114.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (1994) ‘They might be giants: inconsistency and indeterminacy in Vergil’s war in Italy’, Colby Quarterly 30: 206–26.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (2007) Inconsistency in Roman Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (2010) ‘The unfinished Aeneid’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 96–106.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. J. (2017) True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay, 2nd expanded edn (1st edn 1996). Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

O’Hogan, C. (2016) Prudentius and the Landscapes of Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar

O’Loughlin, M. J. K. (1978) The Garlands of Repose: Studies in the Literary Representations of Civic and Retired Leisure. Chicago.Google Scholar

O’Malley, J. W. (1993) The First Jesuits. Cambridge, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

O’Neill, C. E. and Domínguez, J. M. eds. (2001) Diccionario Histórico de la Compañía de Jesús. Biográfico-temático, 4 vols. Rome and Madrid.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, D. (2017) ‘Hospitality narratives in Callimachus and Vergil: the ideology of reception’, Cambridge Classical Journal 63: 118–42.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. ed. (1995) Philodemus and Poetry: Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus, and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ogawa, M. (2013) ‘Mezentius and the Japanese Devils (Riben guizi): a comparative study of Virgil’s epic and a historical experience of Japanese soldiers’, Nagoya Daigaku Bungakubu Kenkyū Ronshū: Bungaku 59: 1–33 at http://hdl.handle.net/2237/17719.Google Scholar

Oksala, T. (1978) Studien zum Verständnis der Einheit und der Bedeutung von Vergils Georgica, Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 60. Helsinki.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (1998) Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (2001) ‘Freud’s Aeneid’, Vergilius 47: 39–63.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (2004) ‘Sibylline syllables: the intratextual Aeneid’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 50: 29–45.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (2009) Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Orlin, L. ed. (1975) Janus: Essays in Ancient and Modern Studies. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2006) Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Otis, B. (1964) Virgil. A Study in Civilized Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Otis, B. (1972) ‘A new study of the Georgics’, Phoenix 26: 40–62.Google Scholar

Oudin, F. (1729) Dissertation critique sur le Culex. Paris.Google Scholar

Pagán, V. E. (2015) ‘Georgics 2.497 and Thebaid 1.19–20: allusion and inspiration’, in Dominik et al. (2015) 362–76.Google Scholar

Page, T. E. ed. (1894) The Aeneid of Virgil I–VI. London.Google Scholar

Page, T. E. (1898) P. Vergilii Maronis Bucolica et Georgica. London.Google Scholar

Palmer, L. R. (1961) The Latin Language. London.Google Scholar

Panayotakis, C. (2008) ‘Virgil on the popular stage’, in Hall, E. and Wyles, R., eds., New Directions in Ancient Pantomime, 186–97. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pandey, N. B. (2017) ‘Sowing the seeds of war: the Aeneid’s prehistory of interpretive contestation and appropriation’, Classical World 111: 7–25.Google Scholar

Panoussi, V. (2009) Greek Tragedy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Ritual, Empire and Intertext. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Panoussi, V. (2010) ‘Aeneas’ sacral authority’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 52–65.Google Scholar

Papaioannou, S. (2000) ‘Vergilian Diomedes revisited: the re-evaluation of the Iliad’, Mnemosyne 53: 193–217.Google Scholar

Papaioannou, S. (2007) Redesigning Achilles. ‘Recycling’ the Epic Cycle in the ‘Little Iliad’ (Ovid, Metamorphoses 12.1–13.622). Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Papaioannou, S. (2016) ‘Embracing Homeric orality in the Aeneid: revisiting the composition politics of Virgil’s first description’, in Efstathiou and Karamanou (2016) 249–61.Google Scholar

Papanghelis, T. D. (1999) ‘Relegens errata litora: Virgil’s reflexive Odyssey’, in Kazazis, J. N. and Rengakos, A., eds., Euphrosyne. Studies in Ancient Epic and its Legacy in Honor of Dimitris N. Maronitis, 275–90. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1963) ‘The two voices of Virgil’s Aeneid’, Arion 2: 66–80 = Commager (1966) 107–23 = Hardie (1999) iii.49–64.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1972) ‘The idea of art in Virgil’s Georgics’, Arethusa 5: 35–52.Google Scholar

Pasquier, B. (1992) Virgile illustré de la Renaissance à nos jours en France et en Italie. Paris.Google Scholar

Pastorino, A. (1957) Tropaeum Liberi. Saggio sul Lucurgus di Nevio e sui motivi dionisiaci nella tragedia latina arcaica. Arona.Google Scholar

Patterson, A. M. ed. (1984) Roman Images. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Patterson, A. M. (1987) Pastoral and Ideology: Virgil to Valéry. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Payne, M. (2007) Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pearce, T. E. V. (1966) ‘The enclosing word-order in the Latin hexameter I, II’, Classical Quarterly 16: 140–71, 298–320.Google Scholar

Pease, A. S. ed. (1935) Publi Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Peirano, I. (2012) The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Peirano, I. (2013) ‘Ille ego qui quondam: on authorial (an)onymity’, in Marmodoro and Hill (2013) 11–30.Google Scholar

Peirano Garrison, I. (2017) ‘Between biography and commentary: the ancient horizon of expectation of VSD’, in Powell and Hardie (2017) 1–28.Google Scholar

Pelttari, A. (2014) The Space that Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Penney, J. H. W. (1999) ‘Archaism and innovation in Latin poetic syntax’, in Adams and Mayer (1999) 249–68.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1981) ‘On the Corycian gardener of Vergil’s Fourth Georgic’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 111: 167–77.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1986) ‘Vergil’s theodicy reconsidered’, in Bernard (1986) 67–83.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1989) The Poet’s Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil’s Georgics. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1990a) ‘On Eclogue 1.79–83’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 171–81 = Volk (2008a) 110–24.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1990b) ‘Vergil’s Eclogues: new directions in scholarship’, Vergilius 36: 43–55.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1994) ‘Ambiguity and irony: the last resort?’, Helios 21: 63–74.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1997) ‘The lament of Juturna: pathos and interpretation in the Aeneid’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 127: 257–86.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1999a) Reading Vergil’s Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Norman.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1999b) ‘Aeneid 1: an epic program’, in Perkell (1999a) 29–49.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (2001) ‘Vergil reading his twentieth-century readers: a study of Eclogue 9’, Vergilius 47: 64–88.Google Scholar

Perutelli, A. (1979) La narrazione commentata. Pisa.Google Scholar

Perutelli, A. (1980) ‘L’episodio di Aristeo nelle Georgiche: struttura e technica narrativa’, Materiali e discussioni 4: 59–76.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. (1968) A History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar

Phaer, T. ed. (1596) The Thirteene Bookes of Aeneidos. London.Google Scholar

Phaer, T. and Twyne, T. eds. (1584) The xiii Bookes of Aeneidos. London.Google Scholar

Piantoni, G. (1984) ‘Il ciclo pittorico della Galleria Sciarra’, in Ciucci, G. and Fraticelli, V., eds., Architettura e urbanistica: uso e trasformazione della città storica, 271–5. Venice.Google Scholar

Pierini, R. Degl’Innocenti (1980) Studi su Accio. Florence.Google Scholar

Pillinger, E. (2019) Cassandra and the Poetics of Prophecy in Greek and Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Platnauer, M. trans. (1922) Claudian, vol. i. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Plésent, C. (1910) Le Culex: Étude sur l’alexandrinisme latin. Paris.Google Scholar

Poggioli, R. (1975) The Oaten Flute: Essays on Pastoral Poetry and the Pastoral Ideal. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Pogorzelski, R. J. (2016) Virgil and Joyce. Nationalism and Imperialism in the Aeneid and Ulysses. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Pollmann, K. (2017) The Baptized Muse: Early Christian Poetry as Cultural Authority. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pontanus, J. ed. (1599) Symbolarum libri XVII. Quibus P. Virgilii Maronis Bucolica, Georgica, Aeneis ex probatissimis auctoribus declarantur, comparantur; illustrantur. Augsburg.Google Scholar

Poole, A. and Maule, J. eds. (1995) The Oxford Book of Classical Verse in Translation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Porter, D. H. (1987) Horace’s Poetic Journey. Princeton.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2004) ‘Vergil’s voids’, Helios 31: 127–56.Google Scholar

Porter, J. I. (2007) ‘Reception studies: future prospects’, in Hardwick and Stray (2007) 469–81.Google Scholar

Posch, S. (1969) Beobachtungen zur Theokritnachwirkung bei Vergil. Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Pöschl, V. (1962) The Art of Vergil. Image and Symbol in the Aeneid, trans. Seligson. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Pöschl, V. (1977) Die Dichtkunst Virgils, 3rd edn. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Powell, A. ed. (1992) Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. Bristol.Google Scholar

Powell, A. (2008) Virgil the Partisan. A Study in the Re-integration of Classics. Swansea.Google Scholar

Powell, A. and Hardie, P. eds. (2017) The Ancient Lives of Virgil. Literary and Historical Studies. Swansea.Google Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. (1990) Cicero: Laelius, On Friendship and the Dream of Scipio. Warminster.Google Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. (2011) ‘Aeneas the spin-doctor: rhetorical self-presentation in Aeneid 2’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 27: 184–202.Google Scholar

Prosperi, A. (2000) L’eresia del Libro Grande. Storia di Giorgio Siculo e della sua setta. Milan.Google Scholar

Pucci, J. (1998) The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition. New Haven.Google Scholar

Pucci, J. (2014) Augustine’s Virgilian Retreat: Reading the Auctores at Cassiciacum. Toronto.Google Scholar

Pugh, S. (2016) Spenser and Virgil: The Pastoral Poems. Manchester.Google Scholar

Purkiss, D. (1998) ‘Marlowe’s Dido, Queen of Carthage and the Representation of Elizabeth I’, in Burden (1998) 151–67.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1970) Virgil’s Pastoral Art: Studies in the Eclogues. Princeton.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1975) ‘Italian Virgil and the idea of Rome’, in Orlin (1975) 171–200.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1979) Virgil’s Poem of the Earth: Studies in the Georgics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1988 [1965]) The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design, 2nd edn. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1990) ‘Anger, blindness and insight in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Apeiron 23: 7–40.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1994) ‘Virgil’s Danaid ekphrasis’, Illinois Classical Studies 19: 171–89.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1995) Virgil’s Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. Chapel Hill, NC and London.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1998a) Virgil’s Epic Designs. Ekphrasis in the Aeneid. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1998b) ‘Dido’s murals and Virgilian ekphrasis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98: 243–75.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (2010a) ‘Some Virgilian unities’, in Hardie and Moore (2010) 17–38.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (2010b) ‘Vergil and Seamus Heaney’, Vergilius 56: 3–16.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (2011) The Humanness of Heroes: Studies in the Conclusion of Virgil’s Aeneid. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. with Hankins, J. ed. and trans. (2004) Maffeo Vegio. Short Epics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Quinn, K. (1963) ‘Virgil’s tragic queen’, Latin Explorations: Critical Studies in Roman Literature, 29–58. London.Google Scholar

Quinn, K. (1968) Virgil’s Aeneid: A Critical Description. London and Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Quint, D. (1989) ‘Repetition and ideology in the Aeneid’, Materiali e discussioni 23: 9–54 = Hardie (1999) iv.117–57.Google Scholar

Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.Google Scholar

Quint, D. (2010) ‘Aeacidae Pyrrhi: patterns of myth and history in Aeneid 1–6’, in Breed, Damon and Rossi (2010) 133–44.Google Scholar

Quint, D. (2014) Inside Paradise Lost: Reading the Designs of Milton’s Epic. Princeton.Google Scholar

Quint, D. (2018) Virgil’s Double Cross. Design and Meaning in the Aeneid. Princeton.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. and Toher, M. (1990) Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Rabb, T. K. (1960) ‘Sebastian Brant and the first illustrated edition of Vergil’, Princeton University Library Chronicle 21: 187–99.Google Scholar

Rabinowitz, N. S. and Auanger, L. eds. (2002) Among Women: From the Homosocial to the Homoerotic in the Ancient World. Austin.Google Scholar

Rädle, F. (2013) ‘Jesuit theatre in Germany, Austria and Switzerland’, in Bloemendal, J. and Norland, H. B., eds., Neo-Latin Drama and Theatre in Early Modern Europe, 185–292. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Ramires, G. ed. (1996) Servio. Commento al libro VII dell’Eneide di Virgilio. Con le aggiunte del cosiddetto Servio Danielino. Bologna.Google Scholar

Ramires, G. (2003) Servio. Commento al libro IX dell’Eneide di Virgilio. Con le aggiunte del cosiddetto Servio Danielino. Bologna.Google Scholar

Rand, E. K. (1919) ‘Young Virgil’s poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 30: 103–85.Google Scholar

Rand, E. K. et al. (1946) Servianorum in Vergilii Carmina Commentariorum Editionis Harvardianae, vol. ii. Lancaster, PA.Google Scholar

Ravenna, G. (1974) ‘L’ecphrasis poetica di opera d’arte in latino’, Quaderni Istituto Filologia Latina Padova 3: 1–51.Google Scholar

Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Raybould, R. (2016) The Sibyl Series of the Fifteenth Century. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Reckford, K. J. (1995) ‘Recognizing Venus (I): Aeneas meets his mother’, Arion 3: 1–42.Google Scholar

Reed, J. D. (2007) Virgil’s Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid. Princeton.Google Scholar

Reed, J. D. (2010) ‘Vergil’s Roman’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 66–79.Google Scholar

Reed, J. D. (2016) ‘Mora in the Aeneid’, in Mitsis and Ziogas (2016) 87–106.Google Scholar

Rees, R. ed. (2004) Romane memento: Vergil in the Fourth Century. Bristol.Google Scholar

Rees, R. (2017) ‘The poetics of Latin prose praise and the fourth-century curve’, in Elsner and Hernández Lobato (2017) 313–44.Google Scholar

Reeve, M. D. (1983) ‘Appendix Vergiliana’, in Reynolds (1983) 437–40.Google Scholar

Reeves, G. (1989) T. S. Eliot: A Virgilian Poet. Basingstoke.Google Scholar

Rehm, B. (1932) Das geographische Bild des alten Italien in Vergils Aeneis, Philologus Suppl. 24.2. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Rehm, R. (1994) Marriage to Death: The Conflation of Wedding and Funeral Rituals in Greek Tragedy. Princeton.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T. (2014) ‘Style’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) iii.1220–2.Google Scholar

Rengakos, A. and Grethlein, J. eds. (2009) Narratology and Interpretation. The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature, Trends in Classics, Suppl. vol. 4. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Rengakos, A. and Tsitsiou-Chelidoni, C. (2012) Narratology and Classics. New York.Google Scholar

Reynolds, L. D. ed. (1983) Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Reynolds, M. (2011) The Poetry of Translation: from Chaucer and Petrarch to Homer and Logue. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ricardou, J. (1970) ‘La bataille de la phrase’, Critique 274: 226–56.Google Scholar

Rich, A. (1979) On Lies, Secrets and Silence. Selected Prose 1966–1978. New York.Google Scholar

Rich, J. (2012) ‘Making the emergency permanent: auctoritas, potestas and the evolution of the principate of Augustus’, in Rivière, Y., ed., Des réformes augustéennes, 37–121. Paris.Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (1991) The Garden of Priapus, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (1993) ‘Not before homosexuality: the materiality of the cinaedus and the Roman law against love between men’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 3: 523–73.Google Scholar

Richlin, A. (2015) ‘Reading boy-love and child-love in the Greco-Roman world’, in Masterson, M., Rabinowitz, N. S., and Robson, J., eds., Sex in Antiquity, 352–73. London.Google Scholar

Richmond, J. A. (1984) ‘The Catalepton and its background’, in Atti del convegno mondiale scientifico di studi su Virgilio, Mantova, Roma, Napoli, 19–24 settembre 1981, 50–65. Milan.Google Scholar

Rickard, J. (2015) Writing the Monarch in Jacobean England. Jonson, Donne, Shakespeare and the Works of King James. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ricks, C. (2002) Allusion to the Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1991) A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination, ed. Valdes, M. J.. New York and London.Google Scholar

Riddiford, A. (2013) Madly after the Muses. Bengali Poet Michael Madhusudan Datta and his Reception of the Graeco-Roman Classics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Roche, P. ed. (2009) Lucan De bello civili Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rogerson, A. (2017) Virgil’s Ascanius: Imagining the Future in the Aeneid. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Romani, F. (1902) Poesia pagana e arte cristiana. Florence.Google Scholar

Rorty, A. O. (1992) ‘The psychology of Aristotelian tragedy’, in Rorty, A. O., ed., Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics, 1–22. Princeton.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. (1979) ‘Punto di vista narrativo e antichi esegeti di Virgilio’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Class. di Lett. e Fil. Pisa.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, T. G. (1969) The Green Cabinet: Theocritus and the European Pastoral Lyric. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, E. (1972) The Illuminations of the Vergilius Romanus (Cod. Vat. Lat. 3867). A Stylistic and Iconographical Analysis. Zurich.Google Scholar

Ross, D. O., Jr (1969) Style and Tradition in Catullus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Ross, D. O., Jr (1975a) Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy, and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ross, D. O., Jr (1975b) ‘The Culex and Moretum as post-Augustan literary parodies’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 79: 235–63.Google Scholar

Ross, D. O., Jr (1987) Virgil’s Elements: Physics and Poetry in the Georgics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ross, D. O., Jr (2007) Virgil’s Aeneid: A Reader’s Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2004) Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Roman Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Rossi, A. (2010) ‘Ab Urbe Condita: Roman history on the shield of Aeneas’, in Breed, Damon and Rossi (2010) 145–56.Google Scholar

Rowe, G. (2013) ‘Reconsidering the auctoritas of Augustus’, Journal of Roman Studies 103: 1–15.Google Scholar

Ruby, L. W. (1990) ‘Sebastiaen Vrancx as illustrator of Virgil’s Aeneid’, Master Drawings 28: 54–73.Google Scholar

Ruden, S. trans. (2008) The Aeneid. New Haven.Google Scholar

Rupprecht, K. (2007) Cinis omnia fiat: Zum poetologischen Verhältnis der pseudo-vergilischen Dirae zu den Bucolica Vergils. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Rutherford, R. B. (1996) Homer. Oxford.Google Scholar

Salvatore, A. (1996) ‘Appendix vergiliana’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 1: 229–33. Rome.Google Scholar

Salvatore, A., De Vivo, A., Nicastri, L., and Polara, I. eds. (1997) Appendix Vergiliana. Rome.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P. (1966) ‘Science and stocks’, Newsweek, 19 September 1966.Google Scholar

Santini, C. and Stok, F. eds. (2008) Esegesi dimenticate di autori classici. Pisa.Google Scholar

Saunders, T. (2008) Bucolic Ecology. Virgil’s Eclogues and the Environmental Literary Tradition. London.Google Scholar

Scafoglio, G. (2001) ‘La tragedia di Eschilo nel libro II dell’Eneide’, L’Antiquité Classique 70: 69–86.Google Scholar

Scafoglio, G. (2010) Noctes Vergilianae: Ricerche di filologia e critica letteraria sull’ Eneide. Hildesheim and New York.Google Scholar

Scappaticcio, M. C. (2013) Papyri Vergilianae. L’apporto della papirologia alla storia della tradizione virgiliana (I–VI d.C.). Liège.Google Scholar

Schafer, J. K. (2017) ‘Authorial pagination in the Eclogues and Georgics’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 147: 135–78.Google Scholar

Schama, S. (1995) Landscape and Memory. London.Google Scholar

Schauer, M. (2007) Aeneas dux in Vergils Aeneis. Eine literarische Fiktion in augusteischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Schenk, P. (1984) Die Gestalt des Turnus in Vergils Aeneis. Königstein.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (1994) ‘Seneca’s Thyestes and the morality of tragic furor’, in Elsner and Masters (1994) 196–210.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (1997) ‘The boundaries of knowledge in Virgil’s Georgics’, in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997) 63–89.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. (2008) ‘Furthest voices in Virgil’s Dido’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 6: 60–109, 194–245.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A., Mitsis, P., and Clay, J. S. eds. (1993) Mega nepios. Il distinatario nell’epos didascalico, Materiali e discussioni 31. Pisa.Google Scholar

Schlunk, R. R. (1974) The Homeric Scholia and the Aeneid: A Study of the Influence of Ancient Homeric Literary Criticism on Vergil. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Schmidt, E. A. ed. (2001) L’Histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine, Entretiens Hardt 47. Vandoeuvres.Google Scholar

Schmidt, E. A. (2008) [1975] ‘Arcadia: modern occident and classical antiquity’, in Volk (2008a) 16–47.Google Scholar

Schmidt, E. G. (1988) ‘Vergil und die Odyssee: Strukturfragen der Aeneis’, in Erworbenes Erbe: Studien zur antiken Literatur und ihre Nachwirkung, 306–18. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Schmit-Neuerburg, T. (1999) Vergils Aeneis und die antike Homerexegese: Untersuchungen zum Einfluß ethischer und kritischer Homerrezeption auf imitatio und aemulatio Vergils. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Schneider, B. (1983) ‘“Virgilius pictus” – Sebastian Brants illustrierte Vergilausgabe und ihre Nachwirkung: Ein Beitrag zur Vergilrezeption im deutschen Humanismus’, Wolfenbütteler Beiträge 6: 202–62.Google Scholar

Schoonhoven, H. ed. (1980) Elegiae in Maecenatem: Prolegomena, Text and Commentary. Groningen.Google Scholar

Schreiber, E. G. and Maresca, T. E. eds. and trans. (1979) Commentary on the First Six Books of Virgil’s Aeneid by Bernardus Silvestris. Lincoln and London.Google Scholar

Scott, K. (1933) ‘The political propaganda of 44–30 bc’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 11: 7–49.Google Scholar

Seaford, R. (1987) ‘The tragic wedding’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 107: 106–30.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1989) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world’, in Griffin and Barnes (1989) 97–119.Google Scholar

Seeber, N. (1997) Enea Vergilianus. Vergilisches in den ‘Kommentaren’ des Enea Silvio Piccolomini (Pius II.). Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Seelentag, S. ed. (2012) Der pseudovergilische Culex: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1966) ‘Orpheus and the Fourth Georgic: Vergil on nature and civilization’, American Journal of Philology 87: 307–25.Google Scholar

Segal, C. (1986) ‘Greek tragedy and society: a structuralist perspective’, Interpreting Greek Tragedy, 21–47. Ithaca, NY, and London.Google Scholar

Seider, A. M. (2013) Memory in Virgil’s Aeneid: Creating the Past. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Seider, A. M. (2017) ‘Allure without allusion: quoting a Virgilian epitaph in a 9/11 memorial’, Interfaces 38: 173–94.Google Scholar

Sellar, W. Y. (1877) The Roman Poets of the Augustan Age. Virgil. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sens, A. ed. (2011) Asclepiades of Samos: Epigrams and Fragments. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Seo, J. M. (2013) Exemplary Traits: Reading Characterization in Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sforza, F. (1935) ‘The problem of Virgil’, Classical Review 49: 97–108.Google Scholar

Shanzer, D. (2012) ‘Augustine and the Latin Classics’, in Vessey, M., ed., A Companion to Augustine, 161–74. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. (1994) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. (2011) ‘Womanly wailing? The mother of Euryalus and gendered reading’, Eugesta 1: 55–77.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. eds. (2000) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford.Google Scholar

Shklovsky, V. (2004) [1917]) ‘Art as technique’, in Rivkin, J. and Ryan, M., eds. Literary Theory: An Anthology, 15–21. New York.Google Scholar

Sidney, P. (1973) An Apology for Poetry, ed. Shepherd, G.. Manchester.Google Scholar

Sikes, E. E. (1923) Roman Poetry. London.Google Scholar

Silk, M, Gildenhard, I., and Barrow, R. (2014) The Classical Tradition: Art, Literature, Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Simon, C. (1969) La bataille de Pharsale. Paris.Google Scholar

Simon, E. (1982) ‘Vergil und die Bildkunst’, Maia 34: 203–17.Google Scholar

Simón-Díaz, J. (1944) ‘Para la biografía del P. Juan Luis de la Cerda’, Razón y fe 130: 424–34.Google Scholar

Simón-Díaz, J. (1992) Historia del Colegio Imperial de Madrid. Madrid.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. D. trans. (1951) Dante Inferno. Oxford.Google Scholar

Singleton, R. C. (1859) The works of Virgil, closely rendered into English rhythm, and illustrated from British poets of the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries. London.Google Scholar

Skinner, M. B. (2014) Sexuality in Greek and Roman Culture, 2nd edn. Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Skutsch, F. (1901) Aus Vergils Frühzeit. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. ed. (1985) The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sloman, J. (1985) Dryden: The Poetics of Translation. Toronto.Google Scholar

Small, J. P. (2003) The Parallel Worlds of Classical Art and Text. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smith, B. H. (1968) Poetic Closure. A Study of How Poems End. Chicago.Google Scholar

Smith, C. J. (2006) The Roman Clan: The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smith, H. (2006) Georgian Monarchy: Politics and Culture, 1714–1760. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smith, S. (1993) Subjectivity, Identity, and the Body: Women’s Autobiographical Practices in the Twentieth Century. Bloomington and Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Snell, B. (1953) The Discovery of the Mind: The Greek Origins of European Thought, trans. T. G. Rosenmeyer. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Sonnabend, M. and Whiteley, J. with Rümelin, C. (2011) Claude Lorrain: The Enchanted Landscape. Oxford.Google Scholar

Soubiran, J. (1966) L’Elision dans la poésie latine. Paris.Google Scholar

Sowerby, R. (1997a) ‘Early humanist failure with Homer (I)’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 4: 37–63.Google Scholar

Sowerby, R. (1997b) ‘Early humanist failure with Homer (II)’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition 4: 165–94.Google Scholar

Sowerby, R. (2006) The Augustan Art of Poetry: Augustan Translation of the Classics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sowerby, R. (2010) Early Augustan Virgil: Translations by Denham, Godolphin, and Waller. Lewisburg.Google Scholar

Spargo, J. W. (1934) Virgil the Necromancer. Studies in Virgilian Legends. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Spence, S. ed. (2001) Poets and Critics Read Vergil. New Haven.Google Scholar

Spence, S. (2014) Review of Cox (2011), Modern Philology 112: E137–40.Google Scholar

Spenser, E. (2001) The Faerie Queene, rev. edn. Hamilton, A. C.. London.Google Scholar

Spentzou, E. and Fowler, D. eds. (2002) Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Speyer, W. (1971) Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum. Munich.Google Scholar

Spofford, E. W. (1981) The Social Poetry of the Georgics. Salem.Google Scholar

Spurr, M. S. (1986) ‘Agriculture and the Georgics’, Greece & Rome 33: 164–87.Google Scholar

Squire, M. (2014) ‘The ordo of rhetoric and the rhetoric of order’, in Elsner, J. and Meyer, M., eds., Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture, 353–417. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Squire, M. (2015) Ecphrasis. Visual and Verbal Interaction in Ancient Greek and Latin Literature, Oxford Handbooks Online.Google Scholar

Stabryła, S. (1970) Latin Tragedy in Virgil’s Poetry. Wrocław.Google Scholar

Stachon, M. (2014) Tractavi monumentum aere perennius: Untersuchugen zu vergilischen und ovidischen Pseudepigraphen. Trier.Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (1981) ‘Aeneas – an “unheroic” hero?’, Arethusa 14: 157–77.Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (1998) Virgil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. Swansea.Google Scholar

Stahl, H.-P. (2015) Poetry Underpinning Power. Vergil’s Aeneid: The Epic for Emperor Augustus. A Recovery Study. Swansea.Google Scholar

Stanford, W. B. (1963) The Ulysses Theme, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Stark, C. (2014) ‘Sibyl in art’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) iii.1168–71.Google Scholar

Starr, R. J. (1992) ‘An epic of praise: Tiberius Claudius Donatus and Vergil’s Aeneid’, Classical Antiquity 11: 159–74.Google Scholar

Stehle, E. M. (1974) ‘Virgil’s Georgics: the threat of sloth’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 104: 347–69.Google Scholar

Steiner, G. (1990) ‘Homer and Virgil and Broch’, The London Review of Books, 12 July: 10–11.Google Scholar

Steiner, G. (1998) After Babel. Aspects of Language and Translation, 3rd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Steiner, T. R. (1975) English Translation Theory 1650–1800. Amsterdam and Assen.Google Scholar

Stevens, J. (1945) ‘Un humaniste espagnol: le Père Juan-Luis de la Cerda, commentateur de Virgile’, Les études classiques 13: 210–21.Google Scholar

Stevenson, T. B. (1983) Miniature Decoration in the Vatican Virgil. A Study in Late Antique Iconography. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Stief, A. (1986) Die Aeneisillustrationen von Girodet-Trioson. Künstlerische und literarische Rezeption von Vergils Epos in Frankreich um 1800. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar

Stocker, A. F. (1963) ‘Servius servus magistrorum’, Vergilius 9: 9–15.Google Scholar

Stocker, A. F. and Travis, A. H. eds. (1965) Servianorum in Vergilii Carmina Commentariorum Editionis Harvardianae, vol. iii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Stöckinger, M. (2016) Vergils Gaben. Materialität, Reziprozität und Poetik in den Eklogen und der Aeneis. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (1991) ‘La “Vita di Virgilio” di Zono de’ Magnalis’, Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 33: 143–81.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2009) ‘Il commento di Pomponio Leto all’Eneide di Virgilio’, Studi umanistici piceni 29: 251–73.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2010) ‘The life of Vergil before Donatus’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 107–20.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2011) ‘Servio nel commento virgiliano di Pomponio Leto’, in Bouquet and Méniel (2011) 491–506.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2013) ‘Servio e la metempsicosi’, in Stok, F., ed., Totus scientia plenus. Percorsi dell’esegesi virgiliana, 165–92. Pisa.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2014) ‘Il commento di Pomponio Leto alle Bucoliche’, Rationes rerum 4: 161–90.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2014–15) ‘Philargyrius biografo di Virgilio’, Revue des études tardo-antiques 4: 217–40.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2015a) ‘Donatus, “Philargyrius” and the archetypus of the Vita Vergili’, Giornale italiano di filologia 67: 283–97.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2015b) ‘Virgil’s biography between rediscovery and revision’, Renæssanceforum 9: 73–86.Google Scholar

Stok, F. (2018) ‘Was Philargyrius a Christian?’, Giornale italiano di filologia 70: 157–70.Google Scholar

Strauss, W. L. (1972) The Complete Engravings, Etchings and Drypoints of Albrecht Dürer. New York.Google Scholar

Stuart, D. R. (1922) ‘Biographical criticism of Vergil since the Renaissance’, Studies in Philology 19: 1–30.Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. (1981) ‘Von der Vita Vergiliana über die Accessus Vergiliani zum Zauberer Virgilius. Probleme – Perspektiven – Analysen’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii, 31.2: 1156–262. Berlin.Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. (1992) ‘Aeneis picturis narrata – Aeneis versibus picta. Semiotische Überlegungen zu Vergil-Illustrationen oder visuelles Erzählen. Buchillustrationen zu Vergils Aeneis’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 10: 271–334.Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. (2008) Handbuch der illustrierten Vergil-Ausgaben 1502–1840. Hildesheim, Zurich, and New York.Google Scholar

Suerbaum, W. (2009) ‘The king’s two bodies: is Aeneas an embodiment of Augustus in illustrations for the Aeneid?’, Vergilius 55: 31–54.Google Scholar

Sullivan, M. B. (2014) ‘September 11 Memorial and Museum’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) iii.1145–6.Google Scholar

Sung, M.-Y. (2009) William Blake and the Art of Engraving. London.Google Scholar

Surrey, , H. H. Earl of (1964) Poems, ed. Jones, E.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syed, Y. (2005) Virgil’s Aeneid and the Roman Self. Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1957) Tacitus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1959) ‘Livy and Augustus’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 64: 27–87.Google Scholar

Syme, R. (1983) Historia Augusta Papers. Oxford.Google Scholar

Taisne, A.-M. (2002) ‘Lecture d’Homère dans l’épître d’Horace à Lollius Maximus’, in Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, É., eds., Epistulae Antiquae II, 149–59. Louvain.Google Scholar

Tanner, M. (1993) The Last Descendant of Aeneas. The Hapsburgs and the Mythic Image of the Emperor. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (1978) ‘Senecan drama and its antecedents’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 82: 213–63.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (1985) Seneca: Thyestes. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (1992) ‘Nights at the Copa: observations on language and date’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 331–47.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (2002) ‘Ovid and ancient literary history’, in Hardie, P. R., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, 13–33. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (2012) Virgil Aeneid Book XII. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tasso, T. (1973) Discourses on the Heroic Poem, ed. and trans. Cavalchini, M. and Samuel, I.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Tate, A. (1977) Collected Poems 1919–1976. New York.Google Scholar

Taylor, L. R. (1934) ‘Varro’s De gente populi Romani’, Classical Philology 29: 221–9.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. (1997) ‘Two pathic subcultures in Rome’, Journal of the History of Sexuality 7: 319–71.Google Scholar

Temporini, H. and Haase, W. eds. (1981) Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Berlin.Google Scholar

Tengström, E. (1977) ‘Theater und Politik im kaiserlichen Rom’, Eranos 75: 43–56.Google Scholar

Teuffel, W. (1873) Geschichte der römischen Literatur, vol. i. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. (2011) Playing the Farmer: Representations of Rural Life in Vergil’s Georgics. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Thilo, G. ed. (1881–7) Servii grammatici qui feruntur in Vergilii carmina commentarii. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Thilo, G. and Hagen, H. eds. (1878–1902) Servii Grammatici Qui Feruntur in Vergilii Carmina Commentarii. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. (1880) Essai sur Servius et son commentaire sur Virgile. Paris.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1982) Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry, Philological Society Suppl. vol. 7. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1983) ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman poetry’, Classical Quarterly 33: 92–113 = Hardie (1999) ii.223–52 = Volk (2008b) 189–224.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1986a) ‘From recusatio to commitment’, in Cairns, F., ed., Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, v.61–73. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1986b) ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the art of reference’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 171–98 = Hardie (1999) ii.58–82.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1987) ‘Prose into poetry: tradition and meaning in Virgil’s Georgics’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 91: 229–60 = Volk (2008b) 43–80.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1988) Virgil, Georgics, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1990) ‘Ideology, influence, and future studies in the Georgics’, Vergilius 36: 64–73.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1993) ‘Callimachus back in Rome’, in Harder et al. (1993) 197–205.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1998a) ‘Voice, poetics and Virgil’s Sixth Eclogue’, in Watkins, C., Oliver, L., Melchert, H. C., and Jasanoff, J., eds., Mír Curad. Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, 669–76. Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1998b) ‘The isolation of Turnus: Aeneid book 12’, in Stahl, H.-P., ed., Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context, 271–302. Swansea.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and his Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2000) ‘A trope by any other name: “polysemy,” ambiguity, and significatio in Virgil’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 381–407.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2001) Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2009) ‘Ovid’s Reception of Virgil’, in Knox, P. E., ed., A Companion to Ovid, 294–307. Chichester and Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2012) Horace: Odes Book 4 and Carmen saeculare. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (2014) ‘Meter’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) ii.820–6.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. and Ziolkowski, J. M. eds. (2014) The Virgil Encyclopedia, 3 vols. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Thompson, L. and Winnick, R. H. (1976) Robert Frost: The Later Years 1938–63. New York.Google Scholar

Thornton, A. (1976) The Living Universe. Gods and Men in Virgil’s Aeneid. Leiden.Google Scholar

Thrale, H. (1942) Thraliana, ed. Balderston, K. C., 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Timpanaro, S. (1986) Per la storia della filologia Virgiliana antica, Quaderni di ‘filologia e critica’ 6. Rome.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, C. ed. (1980) The Oxford Book of Verse in English Translation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Torlone, Z. M. (2014) Vergil in Russia: National Identity and Classical Reception, Oxford.Google Scholar

Traina, A. (1974) Vortit barbare. Le traduzioni poetiche da Livio Andronico a Cicerone. Rome.Google Scholar

Traina, A. (1989) Poeti latini (e neolatini) III. Bologna.Google Scholar

Trinacty, C. V. (2014) Senecan Tragedy and the Reception of Augustan Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Truby, J. (2007) The Anatomy of Story. New York.Google Scholar

Tudeau-Clayton, M. (1998) Jonson, Shakespeare, and Early Modern Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Turner, N. (2001) European Drawings 4: Catalogue of the Collections. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Ursinus, F. ed. (1567) Virgilius collatione Graecorum scriptorum illustratus. Antwerp.Google Scholar

Usher, P. J. (2012) ‘The Aeneid in the 1530s: reading with the Limoges enamels’, in Usher, P. J. and Fernbach, I., eds., Virgilian Identities in the French Renaissance, 161–87. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Usher, P. J. (2014) Epic Arts in Renaissance France. Oxford.Google Scholar

Vallat, D. (2017) ‘Varro in Virgilian commentaries: transmission in fragments’, Varronian Moments, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, ed. Arena, V. and Mac Góráin, F., 60–2: 92–107.Google Scholar

Van Sickle, J. B. (1976) ‘Theocritus and the development of the conception of bucolic genre’, Ramus 5: 18–44.Google Scholar

Van Sickle, J. B. (1998) Review of ‘Green politics: the Eclogues’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 11: 39.Google Scholar

Van Sickle, J. B. (2000) ‘Virgil vs Cicero, Lucretius, Theocritus, Callimachus, Plato and Homer: two programmatic plots in the First Bucolic’, Vergilius 46: 21–58.Google Scholar

Van Sickle, J. B. (2004) ‘Vergil, Bucolics 1.1–2 and interpretive tradition: a Latin (Roman) program for a Greek genre’, Classical Philology 99: 336–53.Google Scholar

Van Sickle, J. B. (2005) The Design of Virgil’s Bucolics. London.Google Scholar

Van Sickle, J. B. (2014) ‘Reception theorists neglect Virgil’s first reception: theatrical propaganda and the Bucolics performed’, www.researchgate.net/publication/237231790_Reception_Theorists_Neglect_Virgil%27s_First_Reception_Theatrical_Propaganda_the_Bucolics_Performed.Google Scholar

Vance, N. (1997) The Victorians and Ancient Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Vasunia, P. (2013) The Classics and Colonial India. Oxford.Google Scholar

Vasunia, P. and Stephens, S. eds. (2010) Classics and National Cultures. Oxford.Google Scholar

Venuti, L. (1995) The Translator’s Invisibility. London.Google Scholar

Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. (1981) Tragedy and Myth in Ancient Greece. Brighton.Google Scholar

Verstegen, I. (2015) ‘Conjugal piety: Creusa in Barocci’s Aeneas’ Flight from Troy’, in Rose, M. and Poe, A. C., eds., Receptions of Antiquity, Constructions of Gender in European Art, 1300–1600, 393–417. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Vessey, M. ed. (2012) A Companion to Augustine. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. (1988) Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry, and the West, trans. D. Pellauer. Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Vidal-Naquet, P. (1981) ‘The black hunter and the origins of the Athenian ephebeia’, in Gordon, R. L., ed., Myth, Religion and Society, 147–62. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Vogt-Spira, G. (2002) ‘Warum Vergil statt Homer? Der frühneuzeitliche Vorzugsstreit zwischen Homer und Vergil im Spannungsfeld von Autorität und Historisierung’, Poetica 34: 323–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Volk, K. (2002) The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.CrossRef Google Scholar

Volk, K. (2005) ‘Aetna oder Wie man ein Lehrgedicht schreibt’, in Holzberg (2005) 68–90.Google Scholar

Volk, K. (2008a) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Vergil’s Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Volk, K. (2008b) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Vergil’s Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar

von Albrecht, M. (1970) ‘Zur Tragik von Vergils Turnusgestalt: Aristotelisches in der Schlusszene der Aeneis’, in Festschrift E. Zinn, 1–5. Tübingen = Hardie (1999) iv.376–80.Google Scholar

Waddell, H. (1976) More Latin Lyrics from Virgil to Milton. London.Google Scholar

Wallace, A. (2003) ‘Placement, gender, pedagogy: Virgil’s fourth Georgic in print’, Renaissance Quarterly 56: 377–407.Google Scholar

Wallace, A. (2010) Virgil’s Schoolboys: The Poetics of Pedagogy in Renaissance England. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982) ‘The Golden Age and sin in Augustan ideology’, Past and Present 95: 19–36.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1997) ‘Mutatio morum: the idea of a cultural revolution’, in Habinek and Schiesaro (1997) 3–22.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2005) ‘Mutatas formas: the Augustan transformation of Roman knowledge’, in Galinsky (2005) 55–84.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008) Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Warde Fowler, W. (1918a) Virgil’s Gathering of the Clans. Oxford.Google Scholar

Warde Fowler, W. (1918b) Aeneas at the Site of Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wardle, D. ed. (2014) Suetonius: Life of Augustus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ware, C. (2012) Claudian and the Roman Epic Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ware, C. (2017) ‘The lies the poets tell: poetry in prose panegyrics’, in Elsner and Hernández Lobato (2017) 345–69.Google Scholar

Warton, J. (1763) The Works of Virgil in English Verse. London.Google Scholar

Warwick, H. H. (1975) A Vergil Concordance. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Watkins, J. (1995) The Specter of Dido: Spenser and Virgilian Epic. New Haven and London.CrossRef Google Scholar

Watson, P. (1985) ‘Axelson revisited: the selection of vocabulary in Latin poetry’, Classical Quarterly 35: 430–48.Google Scholar

Webb, R. (2009) Ecphrasis, imagination, and persuasion in ancient rhetorical theory and practice. Princeton.Google Scholar

Weber, C. (1990) ‘Some double entendres in Ovid and Vergil’, Classical Philology 85: 209–14.Google Scholar

Weber, C. (1999) ‘Intimations of Dido and Cleopatra in some contemporary portrayals of Elizabeth I’, Studies in Philology 96: 127–43.Google Scholar

Weber, C. (2014) ‘Bureaucratese in Vergil, Aeneid 8.721’, Vergilius 60:117–25.Google Scholar

Weeda, L. (2015) Vergil’s Political Commentary in the Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid. Berlin.Google Scholar

Weiner, S. (1982) ‘Spenser’s study of English syllables and its completion by Thomas Campion’, Spenser Studies 3: 3–56.Google Scholar

Weinstock, S. (1971) Divus Iulius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wells, F. H. (1970) Poems on Affairs of State, vol. vi: 1697–1704. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Wendel, C. ed. (1914) Scholia in Theocritum Vetera. Leipzig.Google Scholar

West, D. A. (1969) ‘Multiple-correspondence similes in the Aeneid’, Journal of Roman Studies 59: 40–9 = Harrison (1990) 429–44 = Hardie (1999) iii.384–99.Google Scholar

West, D. A. (1975–6) ‘Cernere erat: the shield of Aeneas’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 15: 1–7 = Harrison (1990) 295–304.Google Scholar

West, D. A. trans. (1990) Virgil: The Aeneid. A New Prose Translation. London.Google Scholar

West, D. A. (1995) ‘“Cast out theory”: Horace Odes 1.4 and 4.7’, Classical Association Presidential Address.Google Scholar

West, D. A. and Woodman, T., eds. (1979) Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Westendorp Boerma, R. E. H. ed. (1949–63) P. Vergilii Maronis libellus qui inscribitur Catalepton, 2 vols. Groningen.Google Scholar

Wharton, D. (2008) ‘Sunt lacrimae rerum: a linguistic exploration’, Classical Journal 103: 259–79.Google Scholar

Whitby, M., Hardie, P. and Whitby, M. eds. (1987) Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol.Google Scholar

White, P. (1993) Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar

White, P. (2013) Jodocus Badius Ascensius: Commentary, Commerce and Print. Oxford.Google Scholar

Whittington, L. (2016) Renaissance Suppliants: Poetry, Antiquity, Reconciliation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wigodsky, M. (1972) Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Wilke, U. and Suerbaum, W. eds. (2014) Vergils Aeneis in vier Zyklen von Buch-Illustrationen des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts. Neukirchen.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. (1950) ‘The intention of Virgil’s Georgics’, Greece & Rome 19: 19–28.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. (1959) ‘The language of Virgil and Horace’, Classical Quarterly 9: 181–92 = Harrison (1990) 413–28 = Hardie (1999) iv.26–43.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. (1963) Golden Latin Artistry. Cambridge. Reprinted Bristol and Norman, 1985.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. (1969) The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Williams, C. A. (1995) ‘Greek love at Rome’, Classical Quarterly 45: 517–39.Google Scholar

Williams, C. A. (2010) Roman Homosexuality, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Williams, F. (1978) Callimachus. Hymn to Apollo. Oxford.Google Scholar

Williams, G. (1968) Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Williams, G. (1983) Technique and Ideas in the Aeneid. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Williams, R. (1973) The Country and the City. LondonGoogle Scholar

Williams, R. D. (1964) ‘The Sixth Book of the Aeneid’, Greece & Rome 11: 48–63.Google Scholar

Williams, R. D. (1966–7) ‘Servius, commentator and guide’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 6: 50–6.Google Scholar

Williams, R. D. (1981 [1960]) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quintus. Oxford. Reprinted Bristol.Google Scholar

Williams, R. D. (1981 [1961]) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Tertius. Oxford. Reprinted Bristol.Google Scholar

Williams, R. D. (1982) ‘Style and metre’, Cambridge History of Classical Literature 2.3: 66–72.Google Scholar

Willis, I. (2011) Now and Rome: Lucan and Virgil as Theorists of Politics and Space. London and New York.Google Scholar

Willis, I. (2017) Reception. London.Google Scholar

Wills, G. (2010) ‘Virgil and St Augustine’, in Farrell and Putnam (2010) 123–32.Google Scholar

Wills, J. (1996) Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wilson-Okamura, D. S. (2010) Virgil in the Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wine, H. (1994) Claude: The Poetic Landscape. London.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1971) New Men in the Roman Senate 139 b.c.–14 a.d. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (1979) Clio’s Cosmetics. Leicester.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. (2002) Classics in Progress. London.Google Scholar

Wlosok, A. (1976) ‘Virgils Didotragödie. Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Tragischen in der Aeneis’, in Görgemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. A., eds. Studien zum Antiken Epos, 228–50. Meisenheim am Glan = ‘The Dido tragedy in Virgil: a contribution to the question of the tragic in the Aeneid’, in Hardie (1999) iv.158–81.Google Scholar

Wlosok, A. (1990) Res humanae, res divinae. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Wlosok, A. (1992) ‘Gemina pictura: allegorisierende Aeneisillustrationen in Handschriften des 15. Jahrhunderts’, in Wilhelm, R. M. and Jones, H., eds., The Two Worlds of the Poet: New Perspectives on Vergil, 408–32. Detroit.Google Scholar

Wlosok, A. (1997–8) ‘Illustrated Vergil manuscripts: reception and exegesis’, Classical Journal 93: 355–82.Google Scholar

Wlosok, A. (2002) ‘Vergils Unterwelt (Aeneis VI) in der Buchmalerei von der Spätantike zur Renaissance’, in Dummer, J. and Vielberg, M., eds., Leitbilder aus Kunst und Literatur, 95–153. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Wofford, S. L. (1992) The Choice of Achilles: The Ideology of Figure in the Epic. Stanford.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. and Wisse, J. eds. (2017) Word and Context in Latin Poetry: Studies in Memory of David West. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, W. (1947) The Poetical Works, ed. de Selincourt, E. and Darbishire, H.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wright, D. H. (1993) The Vatican Vergil: A Masterpiece of Late Antique Art. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Oxford.Google Scholar

Wright, D. H. (2001) The Roman Vergil and the Origins of Medieval Book Design. London.Google Scholar

Wright, D. H. (2014) ‘Codices, Virgilian’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) i.278–81.Google Scholar

Wyke, M. (1987) ‘Written women: Propertius’ scripta puella’, Journal of Roman Studies 77: 47–61 = Wyke (2002) 46–77.Google Scholar

Wyke, M. (2002) The Roman Mistress. Oxford.Google Scholar

Xinyue, B. and Freer, N. eds. (2019) Reflections and New Perspectives on Virgil’s Georgics. London.Google Scholar

Yaggy, L. W. and Haines, T. L. (1882) Museum of Antiquity. Chicago.Google Scholar

Yamagata, N. (2014) ‘Camilla and Tomoe: female warriors in Virgil and in medieval Japan’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 28: 81–98.Google Scholar

Yates, F. A. (1975) Astraea: The Imperial Theme in the Sixteenth Century. London.Google Scholar

Zabughin, V. (1921–3) Vergilio nel rinascimento italiano da Dante a Torquato Tasso, 2 vols. Bologna. Reprinted Trento, 2000.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, trans. Alan Shapiro. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Zarker, J. W. (1972) ‘The Hercules theme in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 18: 34–48.Google Scholar

Zerner, H. (2014) ‘Virgil reading to Augustus and Octavia in art’, in Thomas and Ziolkowski (2014) iii.1362–4.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1973) ‘Emendavi ad Tironem: some notes on scholarship in the second century a.d.’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 77: 225–43.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1981) Latin Textual Criticism in Antiquity. Salem, NH.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983a) ‘Catullus, Ennius, and the poetics of allusion’, Illinois Classical Studies 8: 251–66 = Gaisser (2007) 198–216.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983b) ‘Recreating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian past’, Critical Inquiry 10: 83–105.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1989) ‘Romane memento: justice and judgement in Aeneid 6’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 119: 263–84.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (1996) ‘Natural law and poetic justice: a Carneadean debate in Cicero and Virgil’, Classical Philology 91: 297–319.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (2001) Review of Adams and Mayer (1999), Classical Journal 97: 83–6.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. (2018) Critics, Compilers, and Commentators. An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 bce – 800 ce. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ziogas, I. (2015) ‘The poet as prince: author and authority under Augustus’, in Baltussen, H. and Davis, P. J. eds. The Art of Veiled Speech: Self-Censorship from Aristophanes to Hobbes, 115–36. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Ziolkowski, T. (1964) Hermann Broch. New York and London.Google Scholar

Ziolkowski, T. (1993) Virgil and the Moderns. Princeton.Google Scholar

Ziolkowski, J. M. and Putnam, M. C. J. eds. (2008) The Virgilian Tradition. The First Fifteen Hundred Years. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Ziosi, A. (2015) Didone regina di Cartagine di Christopher Marlowe: metamorfosi virgiliane nel Cinquecento. Rome.Google Scholar

Zogg, F. (2016) ‘Die Appendix Vergiliana avant la lettre: Martial, Donat, Servius, und der Murbach-Katalog zu Vergils angeblichen Jugendwerken’, Antike und Abendland 62: 74–85.Google Scholar

Zorzetti, N. (1990) ‘Tragici latini’, in Enciclopedia virgiliana 5: 245–7. Rome.Google Scholar

Book contents

Works Cited

Summary

Access options

References

Works Cited

Book contents

Works Cited

Summary

Access options

References

Works Cited

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive