Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:46:25.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - U.S. Foreign Trade and Trade Policy in the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Peter Lindert
Edited by
Stanley L. Engerman  and
Robert E. Gallman
Peter Lindert
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Stanley L. Engerman
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Robert E. Gallman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

Public interest in America’s foreign trade has always concentrated on the issue of America’s “competitiveness” or “leadership” in foreign trade, and whether government policies have promoted it. This chapter addresses those perennial concerns. What has shaped America’s ability to compete, and her comparative advantage, in international trade? Has government policy toward foreign trade been aimed at raising national living standards, and has it had that result?

The five main conclusions reached here feature some rise-and-fall patterns and some revisions of frequent misconceptions:

1. America’s comparative advantages in natural-resource products and in skill-intensive products rose and fell in waves. Our relative exports of natural-resource products peaked around World War I, while our comparative advantage in skill-intensive products peaked in the 1950s and declined until the 1990s. In retrospect, one of the most striking features of American comparative advantage is the steady ascent of skill-intensive exports from the mid-nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth, whereas the “Dutch disease” model would have predicted that our abundance of natural resources would have killed our advantage in skill-intensive manufactures as in so many other countries.

2. U.S. competitive leadership rose and fell, peaking in the 1950s and hitting a low in the early 1980s before recovering somewhat. Early in this century it fell to British and Japanese writers to blame their business leaders, their workers, their government, and their national bad luck for the American, and German, competitive edge in the prestigious modern sectors. By the 1970s and 1980s America had caught up to Britain as a world leader in self-flagellation over lost markets.

3. ...

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Economic History of the United States , pp. 407 - 462
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernathy, William J., Clark, Kim B., and Kantrow, Alan M.. 1983. Industrial Renaissance: Producing a Competitive Future for America (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Adams, Walter, Dirlam, J. B.. 1966. “Big Steel, Invention and Innovation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Robert C. 1979. “International Competition in Iron and Steel, 1850–1913” Journal of Economic History 39 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bairoch, Paul. 1989. “European Trade Policy, 1815–1914” In Mathias, Peter and Pollard, Sidney (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. VIII (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Baldwin, Robert E. 1984. “Trade Policies in Developed Countries” In Jones, Ronald W. and Kenen, Peter (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, vol. 1 (Amsterdam, North-Holland).Google Scholar
Baumol, William J., Blackman, Sue Anne Batey, and Wolff, Edward. 1989. Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).Google Scholar
Beason, Richard, and Weinstein, David E.. 1996. “Growth, Economies of Scale, and Targeting in Japan (1955–1990)” Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (May).Google Scholar
Becker, William H. 1982. The Dynamics of Business–Government Relations: Industry and Exports 1893–1921 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Bishop, John H. 1989. “Is the Test Score Decline Responsible for the Productivity Growth Decline” American Economic Review 79 (March).Google Scholar
Bowen, Harry P., Learner, Edward E., and Sveikauskas, Leo. 1987. “Multicountry, Multi-factor Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory” American Economic Review 77 (December).Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. N., and Crafts., N. F. R. 1992. “Britain’s Productivity Gap in the 1930s: Some Neglected Factors” Journal of Economic History 52 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, S. N., and Fremdling, R.. 1990. “Comparative Productivity in British and German Industry, 1907–37” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52 (November).Google Scholar
Bry, Gerhard, 1960. Wages in Germany, 1871–1945 (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Cas, Alexandra, and Rymes, Thomas K.. 1991. On Concepts and Measures of Multifactor Productivity in Canada, 1961–1980 (New York, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr. 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, MA, Harvarl University Press).Google Scholar
Christensen, L. R., Cummings, D., and Jorgenson, D. W.. 1981. “Relative Productivity Levels, 1947–1973” European Economic Review 16 (May).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gregory., 1987. “Why Isn’t the Whole World Developed? Lessons from the Cotton Mills.” Journal of Economic History 47 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, Graef S., 1992. In Search of Excess: The Overcompenstation of American Exectives (New York, W. W Norton).Google Scholar
Denison, Edward., 1967. Why Growth Rates Differ: Postwar Experience in Nine Western Countries (Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
Dertouzos, Michael, Lester, Richard, and Solow, Robert. 1989. Made in America (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press). Summary volume plus two case-study volumes.Google Scholar
Duke, Richard M., et al. 1977. The United States Steel Industry and Its International Rivals: Trends and Factors Determining International Competitiveness (Washington, D.C., U.S. Federal Trade Commission).Google Scholar
Duncan, W., 1973. U.S.–Japan Automobile Diplomacy (Cambridge, MA, Ballinger).Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A., 1981. “Why Isn’t the Whole World Developed” Journalof Economic History 41 (March).Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry., 1988. “International Competition in the Products of U.S. Basic Industries” In Feldstein, Martin (ed.), The United States in the World Economy (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry., 1989. “The Political Economy of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff” Research in Economic History, 12.Google Scholar
Elbaum, Bernard, and Lazonick, William, eds. 1986. The Decline of the British Economy (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Eysenbach, Mary Locke., 1976. American Manufactured Exports, 1879–1914 (New York, Arno Press).Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert., 1966. “Levels of Nineteenth-Century American Investment in Education” Journal of Economic History 26, (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuss, Melvin, and Waverman, Leonard. 1985. “Productivity Growth in the Auto Industry, 1970–1980: A Comparison of Canada, Japan, and the United States” NBER Working Paper no. 1835.Google Scholar
Fuss, Melvin, and Waverman, Leonard. 1990. “The Extent and Sources of Cost and Efficiency Differences between U.S. and Japanese Motor Vehicle Producers.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 4 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghadar, Fariborz, et al. 1987. U.S. Industrial Competitiveness: The Case of the Textile and Apparel Industries (Lexington, MA, D.C. Heath).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander., 1957. Report on Manufactures, December 5, 1791. Reprinted in McKee, Samuel Jr. (ed.), Papers On Public Credit, Commerce, and Finance: Alexander Hamilton (Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill).Google Scholar
Hawke, Gary R., 1975. “The United States Tariff and Industrial Protection in the Late Nineteenth Century” Economic History Review 2nd series, 28 (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayford, Marc, and Pasurka, Carl A. Jr. 1992. “The Political Economy of the Fordney-McCumber and Smoot-Hawley Tariff Acts.” Explorations in Economic History 29 (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilke, John C., and Nelson, Phillip B.. 1988. U.S. International Competitiveness: Evolution or Revolution? (New York, Praeger).Google Scholar
Hogan, William T., 1971. Economic History of the Iron and Steel Industry of the United States (Lexington, MA, D.C. Heath).Google Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W., Kuroda, Masahiro, and Nishimizu, Mieko. 1987. “Japan–U.S. Industry-Level Productivity Comparisons, 1960–1979” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, Dale W., Gollop, Frank M., and Fraumeni, Barbara M.. Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
Katz, Harold., 1977. The Decline of Competition in the Automobile Industry, 1920–1940 (New York, Arno Press).Google Scholar
Kilmarx, Robert A., ed. 1979. America’s Maritime Legacy: A History of the U.S. Merchant Marine and Shipbuilding Industry since Colonial Times (Boulder, Westview Press).Google Scholar
Krueger, Alan B., and Summers, Lawrence H.. 1987. “Reflections on the Inter-Industry Wage Structure” In Lang, Kevin and Leonard, Jonathan S. (eds.), Unemployment and the Structure of Labor Markets (New York, Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Krueger, Alan B., and Summers, Lawrence H.. 1988. “Efficiency Wages and the Inter-Industry Wage Structure” Econometrica 56 (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Learner, Edward E. 1984. Sources of International Comparative Advantage: Theory and Evidence (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).Google Scholar
Learner, Edward E. 1990. “The Structure and Effects of Tariff and Nontariff Barriers in 1983.” In Jones, Ronald W. and Krueger, Anne O. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1953. “Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 97 (September).Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily. 1956. “Factor Proportions and the Structure of American Trade: Further Theoretical and Empirical Analysis,” Review of Economics and Statistics 38 (November).Google Scholar
Lindert, Peter H. 1991. International Economics. 9th ed. (Homewood, Richard D. Irwin).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward H. 1991. “An Evolutionary Explanation for Competitive Decline: The British Shipbuilding Industry 1890–1970.” Journal of Economic History 51 (December).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, Stephen P., Brock, William A., and Young, Leslie. 1989. Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. N., and Sandberg, Lars G.. 1971. “From Damnation to Redemption: Judgments on the Late Victorian Entrepreneur.” Explorations in Economic History 9 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. 1973. Economic Maturity and Entrepreneurial Decline: British Iron and Steel, 1870–1913 (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
McGraw, Thomas K., and Reinhardt, Forest. 1989. “Losing to Win: U.S. Steel’s Pricing, Investment Decisions and Market Share, 1901–1938.” Journal of Economic History 49 (September).Google Scholar
Morici, Peter. 1988. Reassessing American Competitiveness (Washington, D.C., National Planning Association).Google Scholar
,National Academy of Engineering. 1982. The Competitive Status of the U.S. Auto Industry (Washington, D.C., National Academy Press).
Pollard, Sidney. 1957. “British and World Shipbuilding, 1890–1914.” Journal of Economic History 17 (September).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prestowitz, Clyde. 1988. Trading Places: How We Allowed Japan to Take the Lead (New York, Basic Books)Google Scholar
Rostas, L. 1948. Comparative Productivity in British and American Industry (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Gary R. 1988. “Comparative Advantage, Structural Adaptation, and Japanese Performance.” In Inoguchi, Takashi and Okimoto, Daniel I. (eds.), The Political Economy of Japan, vol. 2 (Stanford, Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Gary, and Wright, Gavin. 1984. “Two Forms of Cheap Labor in Textile History.” Research in Economic History Supplement 3.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1935. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff … the 7929–1930 Revision of the Tariff (New York, Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Supple, Barry. 1991. “Scale and Scope: Alfred Chandler and the Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism.” Economic History Review 2nd series, 44 (August).Google Scholar
Svennilson, Ingvar. 1954. Growth and Stagnation in the European Economy (New York, United Nations).Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. 1966. “The Relative Decline of the British Steel Industry, 1880–1913.” In Rosovsky, Henry (ed.), Industrialization in Two Systems (New York, John Wiley).Google Scholar
Tyson, Laura D’Andrea. 1992. Who’s Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries (Washington, D.C., Institute for International Economics).Google Scholar
,U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1985 and 1996. Employment, Hours, and Earnings, United States, 1909–1984, vol. 1 (Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office), and Employment, Hours, and Earnings, United States, 1988–96 (Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office).
,U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. 1981. U.S. Industrial Competitiveness: A Comparison of Steel, Electronics, and Automobiles (Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office).
Vanek, Jaroslav. 1963. The Natural Resource Content of U.S. Foreign Trade, 1870–1955 (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).Google Scholar
Webbink, Douglas W. 1985. “Factors Affecting Steel Employment besides Steel Imports.” Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics, Working Paper 129 (July).Google Scholar
White, L. J. 1971. The Automobile Industry since 1945 (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehurst, Clinton H. 1983. The U.S. Merchant Marine: In Search of an Enduring Maritime Policy (Annapolis, Naval Institute Press).Google Scholar
Whitehurst, Clinton H. 1986. The U.S. Shipbuilding Industry: Past, Present, and Future (Annapolis, Naval Institute Press).Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. 1991. “Productivity and American Leadership: A Review Article.” Journal of Economic Literature 29 (March).Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. 1986. Old South, New South (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. 1990. “The Origins of American Industrial Success, 1879–1940.” American Economic Review 80 (September).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×