Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:42:47.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Orthographic Effects in the Phonetics and Phonology of Second Language Learners and Users

from Part VI - Variables and Outcomes of Bilingual Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Bene Bassetti
Edited by
Mark Amengual
Mark Amengual
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews evidence that the orthographic forms (spellings) of L2 sounds and words affect L2 phonological representation and processing. Orthographic effects are found in speech perception, speech production, phonological awareness, and the learning of words and sounds. Orthographic forms facilitate L2 speakers/listeners – for instance in lexical learning – but also have negative effects, resulting in sound additions, deletions, and substitutions. This happens because L2 speakers’ L2 orthographic knowledge differs from the actual working of the L2 writing system. Orthographic effects are established after little exposure to orthographic forms, are persistent, can be reinforced by factors other than orthography, including spoken input, and are modulated by individual-level and sound/word-level variables. Future research should address gaps in current knowledge, for instance investigating the effects of teaching interventions, and aim at producing a coherent framework.

Keywords

orthographic effectsorthographic inputsecond language phonologysecond language pronunciationsecond language learningsecond language acquisitionsecond language writing systemsbilingualismlate bilingualismorthographyphonologygeminationspeech productionspeech perceptionspellingword learning
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology , pp. 699 - 720
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrios, S. L. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2020). Second language learning of phonological alternations with and without orthographic input: Evidence from the acquisition of a German-like voicing alternation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41(3), 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2006). Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Written Language and Literacy, 9(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2007). Effects of hanyu pinyin on pronunciation in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In Guder, A., Jiang, X., and Wan, Y., eds., The Cognition, Learning and Teaching of Chinese Characters. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press, pp. 155–179.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2008). Orthographic input and second language phonology. In Piske, T. & Young-Scholten, M., eds., Input Matters in SLA. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2017). Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(11), 1835–1842.Google ScholarPubMed
Bassetti, B. (2023). Effects of Orthography on Second Language Phonology: Learning, Awareness, Perception and Production. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. & Atkinson, N. (2015). Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B., Cerni, T., & Masterson, J. (2022). The efficacy of grapheme-phoneme correspondence instruction in reducing the effect of orthographic forms on second language phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43, 683–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B., Hayes-Harb, R., & Escudero, P. (2015). Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B., Mairano, P., Masterson, J., & Cerni, T. (2020). Effects of orthographic forms on L2 speech production and phonological awareness, with consideration of speaker-level predictors. Language Learning, 70(4), 1218–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B., Masterson, J., Cerni, T., & Mairano, P. (2021). Orthographic forms affect speech perception in a second language: Consonant and vowel length in L2 English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(12), 1583–1603.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B., Sokolović-Perović, M., Mairano, P., & Cerni, T. (2018). Orthography-induced length contrasts in the second language phonological systems of L2 speakers of English: Evidence from minimal pairs. Language and Speech, 61(4), 577–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Munro, M. J. & Bohn, O.-S., eds., Language Experience in Second-Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, G. (2015). Dictionary of the British English Spelling System. Cambridge: OpenBook.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürki, A., Welby, P., Clément, M., & Spinelli, E. (2019). Orthography and second language word learning: Moving beyond “friend or foe?” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(4), 265–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, D. K. (2003). Language specific speech perception and the onset of reading. Reading and Writing, 16, 573–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabanero, M. B. & Alves, U. K. (2008). A transferência grafo-fônico-fonológica na produção de seqüências ortográficas ‘ng’ do inglês (L2): uma abordagem conexionista. ReVEL, 6(11).Google Scholar
Carrasco-Ortiz, H., Amengual, M., & Gries, S. T. (2019). Cross-language effects of phonological and orthographic similarity in cognate word recognition: The role of language dominance. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(3), 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerni, T., Bassetti, B., & Masterson, J. (2019). Effects of orthographic forms on the acquisition of novel spoken words in a second language. Frontiers in Communication, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (2016). Background to the English writing system. In Ryan, D. & Cook, V., eds., The Routledge Handbook of the English Writing System. New York: Routledge, pp. 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. (2010). Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: Evidence from English and Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 272–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detey, S. & Nespoulous, J.-L. (2008). Can orthography influence second language syllabic segmentation? Japanese epenthetic vowels and French consonantal clusters. Lingua, 118(1), 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (2004). From phonemic differences to constraint rankings: Research on second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdener, V. D. & Burnham, D. K. (2005). The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning, 55(2), 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2015). Orthography plays a limited role when learning the phonological forms of new words: The case of Spanish and English learners of novel Dutch words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mulak, K. E. (2014). Learning words in a new language: Orthography doesn’t always help. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 384–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. & Wanrooij, K. (2010). The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech, 53(3), 343–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R., ed., Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J.-I. & Kim, J.-Y. (2017). The influence of orthography on the production of alphabetic, second-language allophones by speakers of a non-alphabetic language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(4), 963–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes-Harb, R. & Barrios, S. (2021). The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition. Language Teaching, 53(3), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Bassetti, B., & Escudero, P. (2015). Orthographic effects in second language phonology [special issue]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(2).Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Brown, K., & Smith, B. L. (2018). Orthographic input and the acquisition of German final devoicing by native speakers of English. Language and Speech, 61(4), 547–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J., & Barker, J. (2010). Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53(3), 367–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, C.-F. (2008). Use orthography in L2 auditory word learning: Who benefits? Reading and Writing, 21(8), 823–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijalba, E. & Obler, L. K. (2015). First language grapheme-phoneme transparency effects in adult second-language learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 47–70.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M. & Marian, V. (2009). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 705–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krepel, A., de Bree, E. H., & de Jong, P. F. (2021). Does the availability of orthography support L2 word learning? Reading and Writing, 34(2), 467–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mairano, P., Bassetti, B., Sokolović-Perović, M., & Cerni, T. (2018). Effects of L1 orthography and L1 phonology on L2 English pronunciation. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 23(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, L. (2016). The influence of foreign scripts on the acquisition of a second language phonological contrast. Second Language Research, 32(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitterer, H. (2021). The role of orthography in learning a second language: Evidence from Maltese English. Xjenza Online, 9(3), 162–172.Google Scholar
Mok, P. P. K., Lee, A., Li, J. J., & Xu, R. B. (2018). Orthographic effects on the perception and production of L2 Mandarin tones. Speech Communication, 101, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimz, K. & Khattab, G. (2020). On the role of orthography in L2 vowel production: The case of Polish learners of German. Second Language Research, 4(36), 623–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattamadilok, C., Welby, P., & Tyler, M. D. (2022). The contribution of visual articulatory gestures and orthography to speech processing: Evidence from novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(10), 1542–1558.Google ScholarPubMed
Piske, T., Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59, 49–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pytlyk, C. (2011). Shared orthography: Do shared written symbols influence the perception of L2 sounds? Modern Language Journal, 54(4), 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pytlyk, C. (2017). Are orthographic effects language specific? The influence of second language orthography on second language phoneme awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(2), 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, Q. & Damian, M. F. (2019). The role of orthography in second-language spoken word production: Evidence from Tibetan Chinese bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(11), 2597–2604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rafat, Y. (2015). The interaction of acoustic and orthographic input in the acquisition of Spanish assibilated/fricative rhotics. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafat, Y. (2016). Orthography-induced transfer in the production of English-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning Journal, 44(2), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafat, Y. & Perry, S. J. (2019). Navigating orthographic issues in the teaching of Spanish pronunciation. In Rao, R., ed., Key Issues in the Teaching of Spanish Pronunciation: From Description to Pedagogy. New York: Routledge, pp. 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafat, Y. & Stevenson, R. A. (2019). Auditory-orthographic integration at the onset of L2 speech acquisition. Language and Speech, 62(3), 427–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rafat, Y., Whitford, V., Joanisse, M. F., et al. (2021). First-language-specific orthographic effects in second-language speech: A comparison of Korean-English and Farsi-English bilinguals. Journal of Monolingual and Bilingual Speech, 3(1), 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, C. (2017). L1 English/L2 Spanish: Orthography-phonology activation without contrasts. Second Language Research, 33(2), 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, A. & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /l/ and /r/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, C. E. (2020). Russian phono-lexical acquisition and orthographic input: Naive learners, experienced learners, and interventions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, C. E. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29(2), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, C. E. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveira, R. (2007). The role of task-type and orthography in the production of word-final consonants. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 15(1), 143–176.Google Scholar
Simon, E., Chambless, D., & Alves, U. K. (2010). Understanding the role of orthography in the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences, 32(3), 380–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonchyk, A. & Darcy, I. (2018). The effect of orthography on the lexical encoding of palatalized consonants in L2 Russian. Language and Speech, 61(4), 522–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokolović-Perović, M., Bassetti, B., & Dillon, S. (2020). English orthographic forms affect L2 English speech production in native users of a non-alphabetic writing system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(3), 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solier, C., Perret, C., Baqué, L., & Soum-Favaro, C. (2019). Written training tasks are better than oral training tasks at improving L2 learners’ speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(6), 1455–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M. (2006). Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: Evidence from non-rhotic speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uchihara, T., Webb, S., Saito, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2022). Does mode of input affect how second language learners create form-meaning connections and pronounce second language words? Modern Language Journal, 106(2), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veivo, O., Järvikivi, J., Porretta, V., & Hyönä, J. (2016). Orthographic activation in L2 spoken word recognition depends on proficiency: Evidence from eye-tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vendelin, I. & Peperkamp, S. (2006). The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua, 116(7), 996–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vokic, G. (2011). When alphabets collide: Alphabetic first-language speakers’ approach to speech production in an alphabetic second language. Second Language Research, 27(3), 391–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisniewska, N. & Mora, J. C. (2020). Can captioned video benefit second language pronunciation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 599–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. (1995). The negative effects of positive evidence on L2 phonology. In Eubank, L., Selinker, L., & Sharwood Smith, M., eds., The Current State of Interlanguage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. (1998). Second language syllable simplification: Deviant development or deviant input? In Allan, J. & Leather, J., eds., New Sounds ’97. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press, pp. 351–360.Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. (2002). Orthographic input in L2 phonological development. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T., & Rohde, A., eds., An Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in Honour of Henning Wode. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, pp. 263–279.Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. (2004). Prosodic constraints on allophonic distribution in adult L2 acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(1), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. & Langer, M. (2015). The role of orthographic input in second language German: Evidence from naturalistic adult learners’ production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zampini, M. L. (1994). The role of native language transfer and task formality in the acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Hispania, 77(3), 470–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). The influence of orthography on oral vocabulary acquisition in learners of Chinese as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 1157–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C. & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 683–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×