Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:22:40.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - The Phonetics and Phonology of the Bilingual Adult

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

Edited by
Mark Amengual
Mark Amengual
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology , pp. 383 - 498
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24(4), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amengual, M. & Chamorro, P. (2015). The effects of language dominance in the perception and production of the Galician mid vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 72(4), 207–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2013). Focusing the lens of language experience: Perception of Ma’di stops by Greek and English bilinguals and monolinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, 2397–2411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2015). The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, M., Tyler, M. D., & Best, C. T. (2012). Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode? Journal of Phonetics, 40, 582–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, M., Wong, P. C. M., & Wang, S. (2015). The effect of intensified language exposure on accommodating talker variability. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58, 722–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 171–204.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2018). Plasticity, variability and age in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. Austin: COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual.Google Scholar
Blasingame, M. & Bradlow, A. R. (2020). Early versus extended exposure in speech perception learning: Evidence from switched-dominance bilinguals. Languages, 5(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5040039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. & Flege, J. E. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(3), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(2), 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brière, E. J. (1966). An investigation of phonological interference. Language, 42(4), 768–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M. (2005). Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(6), 3890–3901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broersma, M. (2008). Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2), 712–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broersma, M. (2010). Perception of final fricative voicing: Native and nonnative listeners’ use of vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), 1636–1644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bylund, E., Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2021). Age of acquisition – not bilingualism – is the primary determinant of less than nativelike L2 ultimate attainment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(1), 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, J. (2015). Production and perception of the /i/-/ɪ/ vowel contrast: The case of L2-dominant early learners of English. Phonetica, 72(2–3), 182–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, C. B. & Kwon, S. (2020). The contributions of crosslinguistic influence and individual differences to nonnative speech perception. Languages, 5(4), 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvin, A. & Phillips, N. A. (2022). Bilinguals show proportionally greater benefit from visual speech cues and sentence context in their second compared to their first language. Ear and Hearing, 43(4), 1316–1326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J., Best, C. T., & Antoniou, M. (2020). Native phonological and phonetic influences in perceptual assimilation of monosyllabic Thai lexical tones by Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 83, 101013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (2009). Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(6), 3522–3525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A. (2012). Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1992). The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 381–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duñabeitia, J. A., Baciero, A., Antoniou, K., et al. (2022). The Multilingual Picture Database. Scientific Data, 9, 431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elman, J. L., Diehl, R. L., & Buchwald, S. E. (1977). Perceptual switching in bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(3), 1589–1608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 233–277.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R., ed., Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(4), 567–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M. R., Blumenfeld, H. K., Carlson, M. T., & Marian, V. (2022). First-language influence on second language speech perception depends on task demands. Language and Speech, 65(1), 28–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Sierra, A., Ramírez-Esparza, N., & Kuhl, P. K. (2016). Relationships between quantity of language input and brain responses in bilingual and monolingual infants. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 110, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Sierra, A., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Silva-Pereyra, J., Siard, J., & Champlin, C. A. (2012). Assessing the double phonemic representation in bilingual speakers of Spanish and English: An electrophysiological study. Brain and Language, 121(3), 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N., eds., Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with Two Languages: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1988). Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(3), 233–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying Bilinguals. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2016). The complementarity principle and its impact on processing, acquisition, and dominance. In Silva-Corvalán, C. & Treffers-Daller, J., eds., Language Dominance in Bilinguals: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–84.Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R. & Cheng, H.-W. (2016). The influence of the Pinyin and Zhuyin writing systems on the acquisition of Mandarin word forms by native English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalashnikova, M. & Carreiras, M. (2022). Input quality and speech perception development in bilingual infants’ first year of life. Child Development, 93(1), e32–e46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolers, P. A. (1966). Reading and talking bilingually. American Journal of Psychology, 79(3), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. (1996). Spoken word recognition of code-switched words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(6), 757–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. Y., Wang, M., Idsardi, W. J., & Xu, Y. (2014). Stress processing in Mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 316–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luk, G. & Bialystok, E. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, M. (1989). Consonant and vowel perception and production: Early English-French bilinguals and English monolinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(2), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, I. R. A., Flege, J. E., Piske, T., & Schirru, C. (2001). Category restructuring during second-language speech acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1), 516–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. L. (1971). Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(5), 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayberry, R. I. & Kluender, R. (2018). Rethinking the critical period for language: New insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 886–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKelvie-Sebileau, P. & Davis, C. (2014). Discrimination of foreign language speech contrasts by English monolinguals and French/English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(5), 3025–3035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melguy, Y. V. (2017). Exploring the bilingual phonological space: Early bilinguals’ discrimination of coronal stop contrasts. Language and Speech, 61(2), 173–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64(3), B9–B17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12(6), 445–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peperkamp, S. (2004). Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception. Language, 80(1), 98–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2008). A typological study of stress “deafness.” In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 203–240.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Dupoux, E. (2010). Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, A. & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2019). Speech perception in bilingual contexts: Neuropsychological impact of mixing languages at the inter-sentential level. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, F., Bosch, L., & Lewkowicz, D. J. (2015). Bilingualism modulates infants’ selective attention to the mouth of a talking face. Psychological Science, 26(4), 490–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramon-Casas, M., Swingley, D., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Vowel categorization during word recognition in bilingual toddlers. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 96–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverría, S., & Bosch, L. (2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 240–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D. & Leśniewska, J. (2021). The critical period hypothesis for L2 acquisition: An unfalsifiable embarrassment? Languages, 6(3), 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stringer, L. & Iverson, P. (2020). Non-native speech recognition sentences: A new materials set for non-native speech perception research. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 561–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremblay, A. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 553–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(1), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. ([1939] 1969). Principles of Phonology (trans. C. A. M. Baltaxe). Berkeley, CA: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in Contact. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1977). The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(4), 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, R., Jiao, L., Wang, M., & Wei, H. (2023). The influence of L2 experience on L1 speech perception: Evidence from Mandarin-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 27(5), 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. D. & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple Regression in Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, L. & Ramon-Casas, M. (2011). Variability in vowel production by bilingual speakers: Can input properties hinder the early stabilization of contrastive categories? Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 514–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (2020). Power considerations in bilingualism research: Time to step up our game. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(5), 813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(2), 421–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casillas, J. V. (2015). Production and perception of the /i/-/ɪ/ vowel contrast: The case of L2-dominant early learners of English. Phonetica, 72(2–3), 182–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casillas, J. V. (2019). Semantic processing triggers cross-linguistic interference during early phonetic category development. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P., eds., Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia, pp. 3348–3352. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_3397.pdf.Google Scholar
Casillas, J. V. (2020a). Phonetic category formation is perceptually driven during the early stages of adult L2 development. Language and Speech, 63(3), 550–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casillas, J. V. (2020b). The longitudinal development of fine-phonetic detail: Stop production in a domestic immersion program. Language Learning, 70(3), 768–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, J. V. & Simonet, M. (2016). Production and perception of the English /æ/–/ɑ/ contrast in switched-dominance speakers. Second Language Research, 32(2), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2013). A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22(3), 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Stockall, L., Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., & Gorba Masip, C. (2021). Illusory vowels in Spanish-English sequential bilinguals: Evidence that accurate L2 perception is neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate L2 production. Second Language Research, 37(4), 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dı́az-Campos, M. (2004). Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dı́az-Campos, M. (2006). The effect of style in second language phonology: An analysis of segmental acquisition in study abroad and regular-classroom students. In Klee, C. A. & Face, T. L., eds., Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 26–39.Google Scholar
Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, P. D. (2010). The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvin, J., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2016). The relationship between perception and production of Brazilian Portuguese vowels in European Spanish monolinguals. Loquens: Spanish Journal of Speech Sciences, 3, 1–10.Google Scholar
Evans, B. G. & Alshangiti, W. (2018). The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L. (2018a). Ultimate attainment in Spanish spirantization: The case of U.S.-born immigrants in Spain. Spanish in Context, 15(1), 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L. (2018b). Ultimate attainment of Spanish rhotics by native English-speaking immigrants to Spain. Language and Migration, 2, 57–80.Google Scholar
Face, T. L. (2021). Ultimate attainment of Spanish laterals by native English-speaking immigrants in Spain. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition, 9, 167–180.Google Scholar
Face, T. L. & Menke, M. (2020). L2 acquisition of Spanish VOT by English-speaking immigrants in Spain. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 13(2), 361–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 229–273.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In Burmeister, T., Piske, T., & Rohde, A., eds., An Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in Honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher, pp. 217–244.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Meyer, A. S. & Schiller, N. O., eds., Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production Differences and Similarities. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 319–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2012). The role of input in second language (L2) speech learning. In Proceedings of the VIth International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English. Łódź, Poland. https://bit.ly/4aOKRtl.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R., ed., Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Eefting, W. (1988). Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: Evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(2), 729–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., & Randazza, L. A. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(2), 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 708–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F. (1995). Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A. & Loken, E. (2014). The statistical crisis in science: Data-dependent analysis – a “garden of forking paths” – explains why many statistically significant comparisons don’t hold up. American Scientist, 102(6), 460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Bueno, M. (1997). Voice onset time in the perception of foreign accent by native listeners of Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 35(4), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorba, C. & Cebrian, J. (2021). The role of L2 experience in L1 and L2 perception and production of voiceless stops by English learners of Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 88, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, E., Engstler, C., & Goldrick, M. (2013). Phonetic processing of non-native speech in semantic vs non-semantic tasks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(6), EL506–EL512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herd, W. J., Walden, R. L., Knight, W. L., & Alexander, S. N. (2015). Phonetic drift in a first language dominant environment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2384–2384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, J. J. (2015). A longitudinal study of the second language acquisition of a three-way stop contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 50, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, M. K. & Schuhmann, K. (2015a). Effect of early L2 learning on L1 stop voicing. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 23(1), 060007.Google Scholar
Huffman, M. K. & Schuhmann, K. (2015b). Individual differences in phonetic drift by English-speaking learners of Spanish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2268–2268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartushina, N. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2014). On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingston, J. & Diehl, R. L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Language, 70, 419–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, B. & Davidson, L. (2019). Effects of exposure and vowel space distribution on phonetic drift: Evidence from American English learners of French. Language and Speech, 62(1), 30–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967a). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967b). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. (1980). Multiple regression. In Lewis-Beck, M., ed., Applied Regression: An Introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In Delais-Roussarie, E., Herment, S., & Avanzi, M., eds., Prosody and Language in Contact. Berlin: Springer, pp. 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2019). Second Language Learning Theories. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, J. C. & Nadeu, M. (2012). L2 effects on the perception and production of a native vowel contrast in early bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(4), 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2017a). A longitudinal study of voice onset time development in L2 Spanish stops. Applied Linguistics, 54(5), 13–23.Google Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2017b). Individual developmental trajectories in the L2 acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 218–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2021). Assessing the state of the art in longitudinal L2 pronunciation research: Trends and future directions. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7(2), 154–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L., & Baese-Berk, M. M. (2021). Advancing the state of the art in L2 speech perception-production research: Revisiting theoretical assumptions and methodological practices. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 580–605.Google Scholar
Nozari, N., Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). Naming and repetition in aphasia: Steps, routes, and frequency effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 541–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortega, L. (2013). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In May, S., ed., The Multilingual Turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and Bilingual Education. New York: Routledge, pp. 32–53.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S. & Bouchon, C. (2011). The relation between perception and production in L2 phonological processing. In Cosi, P., De Mori, R., Di Fabbrizio, G., & Pieraccini, R., eds., Proceedings of Interspeech 2011. Rundle Mall, SA, Australia: Causal Productions, pp. 161–164. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2011-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59(1), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, R. & Mitleb, F. M. (1983). Segmental features and implementation in acquisition of English by Arabic speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 11(3), 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rallo Fabra, L. & Romero, J. (2012). Native Catalan learners’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, L. J. (2005). Acoustic cues to the perception of segmental phonemes. In Pisoni, D. & Remez, R., eds., The Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotello, C. M., Heit, E., & Dubé, C. (2015). When more data steer us wrong: Replications with the wrong dependent measure perpetuate erroneous conclusions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 944–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakai, M. (2018). Moving towards a bilingual baseline in second language phonetic research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(1), 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (2005). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (1969). Foreign accents, language acquisition, and cerebral dominance. Language Learning, 19(3–4), 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (1988). A Time to Speak: A Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Speech. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. (1978). Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In Ritchie, W., ed., Second Language Acquisition Research: Issues and Implications. New York: Academic Press, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starns, J. J., Cataldo, A. M., Rotello, C. M. et al. (2019). Assessing theoretical conclusions with blinded inference to investigate a potential inference crisis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J. (2001). Study abroad learners’ acquisition of the Spanish voiceless stops. MIFLC (Mountain Interstate Foreign Language Conference) Review, 10, 137–151.Google Scholar
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2015). Effects of age and speaking rate on voice onset time: The production of voiceless stops by near-native L2 speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(1), 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Baum, S. (2006). Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P. & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P. & Baker, W. (2007). Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of second language speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1969). Principles of Phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D., Cameron, K., & Sidtis, J. J. (2012). Dramatic effects of speech task on motor and linguistic planning in severely dysfluent Parkinsonian speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26(8), 695–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Leussen, J.-W. & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, T. & Diller, K. (1981). Neurolinguistic considerations on the optimum age for second language learning. In Diller, K., ed., Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar

References

Amengual, M. (2016). The perception of language-specific phonetic categories does not guarantee accurate phonological representations in the lexicon of early bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1221–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrios, S. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2021). L2 processing of words containing English /æ/-/ɛ/ and /l/-/ɹ/ contrasts, and the uses and limits of the auditory lexical decision task for understanding the locus of difficulty. Frontiers in Communication, 6(144), 689470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. (2009). Cue constraints and their interactions in phonological perception and production. In Paul, B. & Silke, H., eds., Phonology in Perception. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 55–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordag, D., Gor, K., & Opitz, A. (2021). Ontogenesis model of the L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(2), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M. & Cutler, A. (2008). Phantom word activation in L2. System, 36, 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M. & Cutler, A. (2011). Competition dynamics of second-language listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 74–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bürki, A. & Gaskell, M. G. (2012). Lexical representation of schwa words: Two mackerels, but only one salami. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 617–631.Google ScholarPubMed
Charles, T. & Trenkic, D. (2015). Speech segmentation in a second language: The role of bi-modal input. In Gambier, Y., Caimi, A., & Mariotti, C., eds., Subtitles and Language Learning. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 173–197.Google Scholar
Cook, S. V. & Gor, K. (2015). Lexical access in L2: Representational deficit or processing constraint? Mental Lexicon, 10(2), 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S. V., Pandža, N. B., Lancaster, A. K., & Gor, K. (2016). Fuzzy nonnative phonolexical representations lead to fuzzy form-to-meaning mappings. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A. (2005). The lexical statistics of word recognition problems caused by L2 phonetic confusion. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, 413–416. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2005-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (2012). Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., & Otake, T. (2006). Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening. Journal of Phonetics, 34(2), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Weber, A., Smits, R., & Cooper, N. (2004). Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 3668–3678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daidone, D. & Darcy, I. (2021). Vocabulary size is a key factor in predicting second language lexical encoding accuracy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 688356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darcy, I., Daidone, D., & Kojima, C. (2013). Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners. Mental Lexicon, 8(3), 372–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., et al. (2012). Direct mapping of acoustics to phonology: On the lexical encoding of front rounded vowels in L1 English-L2 French acquisition. Second Language Research, 28, 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2007). Bilinguals play by the rules: Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners. In Cole, J. & Hualde, J. I., eds., Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 411–442.Google Scholar
Darcy, I. & Thomas, T. (2019). When blue is a disyllabic word: Perceptual epenthesis in the mental lexicon of second language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1141–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Tremblay, A., & Simonet, M. (2017). Editorial: Phonology in the bilingual and bidialectal lexicon. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2012). Individual differences in late bilinguals’ L2 phonological processes: From acoustic-phonetic analysis to lexical access. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 680–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T. (2007). The multilingual lexicon. In Gaskell, G. M., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 251–265.Google Scholar
Dufour, S., Nguyen, N., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2010). Does training on a phonemic contrast absent in the listener’s dialect influence word recognition? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), EL43–EL48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dufour, S., Nguyen, N., Pattamadilok, C., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2016). Does orthographic training on a phonemic contrast absent in the listener’s dialect influence word recognition? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(3), 1871–1877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1568–1578.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mitterer, H. (2012). The perception of English front vowels by North Holland and Flemish listeners: Acoustic similarity predicts and explains cross-linguistic and L2 perception. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M. R., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2016). Phonotactic constraints are activated across languages in bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaskell, M. G. & Dumay, N. (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition, 89(2), 105–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 251–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldinger, S. D. (2007). A complementary-systems approach to abstract and episodic speech perception. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007), 49–54. www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1781/1781.pdf.Google Scholar
Gor, K. & Cook, S. V. (2020). A mare in a pub? Nonnative facilitation in phonological priming. Second Language Research, 36(1), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gor, K., Cook, S., Bordag, D., Chrabaszcz, A., & Opitz, A. (2021). Fuzzy lexical representations in adult second language speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 732030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “l” and “r.” Neuropsychologia, 9(3), 317–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31(3–4), 373–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R. & Barrios, S. (2021). The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition. Language Teaching, 54(3), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R. & Masuda, K. (2008). Development of the ability to lexically encode novel second language phonemic contrasts. Second Language Research, 24(1), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J., & Barker, J. (2010). Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53(3), 367–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Højen, A. & Flege, J. E. (2006). Early learners’ discrimination of second-language vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3072–3084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulstijn, J. (2001). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning. In Robinson, P., ed., Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, E. S. & Strange, W. (2008). Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llompart, M. (2021). Phonetic categorization ability and vocabulary size contribute to the encoding of difficult second-language phonological contrasts into the lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(3), 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llompart, M. & Reinisch, E. (2017). Articulatory information helps encode lexical contrasts in a second language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(5), 1040–1056.Google Scholar
Llompart, M. & Reinisch, E. (2020). The phonological form of lexical items modulates the encoding of challenging second-language sound contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(8), 1590–1610.Google ScholarPubMed
Llompart, M. & Reinisch, E. (2021). Lexical representations can rapidly be updated in the early stages of second-language word learning. Journal of Phonetics, 88, 101080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V. & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurray, B., Apfelbaum, K. S., & Tomblin, J. B. (2022). The slow development of real-time processing: Spoken-word recognition as a crucible for new thinking about language acquisition and language disorders. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(4), 305–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQueen, J. M. (2007). Eight questions about spoken word recognition. In Gaskell, G. M., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (2006). Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science, 30, 1113–1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melnik, G. A. & Peperkamp, S. (2021). High-variability phonetic training enhances second language lexical processing: Evidence from online training of French learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(3), 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, M. (1981). The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech. Journal of Phonetics, 9(3), 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 189–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2), 357–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ota, M., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Haywood, S. L. (2009). The KEY to the ROCK: Near-homophony in nonnative visual word recognition. Cognition, 111(2), 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastian-Gallés, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64(3), B9–B17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastian-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12(6), 445–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelzl, E., Lau, E. F., Guo, T., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). Advanced second language learners’ perception of lexical tone contrasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelzl, E., Lau, E. F., Guo, T., & DeKeyser, R. (2021). Even in the best-case scenario L2 learners have persistent difficulty perceiving and utilizing tones in Mandarin: Findings from behavioral and event-related potentials experiments. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(2), 268–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polivanov, E. (1931). La perception des sons d’une langue étrangère. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 4, 79–96.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Peperkamp, S., Christophe, A., et al. (2010). A psycholinguistic perspective on the acquisition of phonology. In Fougeron, C., Kühnert, B., d’Imperio, M., & Vallée, N., eds., Laboratory Phonology 10: Variation, Phonetic Detail and Phonological Representation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranbom, L. J. & Connine, C. M. (2011). Silent letters are activated in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 236–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastian-Gallés, N. (2005). Cross-language speech perception. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E., eds., The Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 546–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N. & Baus, C. (2005). On the relationship between perception and production in L2 categories. In Cutler, A., ed., Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 279–292.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shook, A. & Marian, V. (2013). The bilingual language interaction network for comprehension of speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 304–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, C. E. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonchyk, A. & Darcy, I. (2018). The effect of orthography on the lexical encoding of palatalized consonants in L2 Russian. Language and Speech, 61(4), 522–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonchyk, A. I. & Darcy, I. (2017). Lexical encoding and perception of palatalized consonants in L2 Russian. In O’Brien, M. & Levis, J., eds., Proceedings of the 8th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Ames: Iowa State University Press, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
Strauß, A., Wu, T., McQueen, J. M., Scharenborg, O., & Hintz, F. (2022). The differential roles of lexical and sublexical processing during spoken-word recognition in clear and in noise. Cortex, 151, 70–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takata, Y. & Nábělek, A. K. (1990). English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(2), 663–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremblay, A., Broersma, M., Coughlin, C. E., & Choi, J. (2016). Effects of the native language on the learning of fundamental frequency in second-language speech segmentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veivo, O. & Järvikivi, J. (2013). Proficiency modulates early orthographic and phonological processing in L2 spoken word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(4), 864–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R. & Guion, S. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naive and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, A. & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F. & Tees, R. C. (1999). Influences on infant speech processing: Toward a new synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 509–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aliaga-García, C., Mora, J. C., & Cerviño-Povedano, E. (2011). L2 speech learning in adulthood and phonological short-term memory. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alispahic, S., Mulak, K. E., & Escudero, P. (2017). Acoustic properties predict perception of unfamiliar Dutch vowels by adult Australian English and Peruvian Spanish listeners. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Kendi, A. & Khattab, G. (2021). Psycho-social constraints on naturalistic adult second language acquisition. Languages, 6, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alshangiti, W. & Evans, B. G. (2014). Investigating the domain-specificity of phonetic training for second-language learning: Comparing the effects of production and perception training on the acquisition of English vowels by Arabic learners of English. In Fuchs, S., Grice, M., Hermes, A., Lancia, L., & Mücke, D., eds., Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar for Speech Production. Cologne: Cologne University, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
Alshangiti, W. & Evans, B. G. (2015). Comparing the efficiency of vowel production training in immersion and non-immersion settings for Arabic learners of English. In Wolters, M., Livingstone, J., Beattie, B., Smith, R., MacMahon, M., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scobbie, J. M., eds., Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015). Glasgow: Glasgow University. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/proceedings.html.Google Scholar
Baker, W. (2010). Effects of age and experience on the production of English word-final stops by Korean speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. & Trofimovich, P. (2005). Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech, 48(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, W. & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Lexical and segmental influences on child and adult learners’ production of second language vowels. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 1, 30–54.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. (2014). Age of acquisition and allophony in Spanish-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrios, S. L. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2020). Second language learning of phonological alternations with and without orthographic input: Evidence from the acquisition of a German-like voicing alternation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2017). Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1835–1842.Google ScholarPubMed
Brandmeyera, A., Desain, P. W. M., & McQueen, J. M. (2012). Effects of native language on perceptual sensitivity to phonetic cues. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 23(11), 653–657.Google Scholar
Broersma, M. (2010). Perception of final fricative voicing: Native and nonnative listeners’ use of vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 1636–1644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bu, L., Nagano, M., Harel, D., & McAllister, T. (2021). Effects of practice variability on second-language speech production training. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 73, 384–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., Kroos, C., & Tyler, M. D. (2012). Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 643–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, E. & Yavas, M. (2017). Vowel reduction in word-final position by early and late Spanish-English bilinguals. PloS ONE, 12(4), e0175226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cebrian, J. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebrian, J. & Carlet, A. (2014). Second-language learners’ identification of target-language phonemes: A short-term phonetic training study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 474–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2018). Perceptual attention as the locus of transfer to nonnative speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B., Zhang, X., Fan, S., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The role of temporal acoustic exaggeration in high variability phonetic training: A behavioral and ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, B. & Zhang, Y. (2015). Syllable structure universals and native language interference in second language perception and production: Positional asymmetry and perceptual links to accentedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, J., Kim, S., & Cho, T. (2016). Phonetic encoding of coda voicing contrast under different focus conditions in L1 vs. L2 English. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cibelli, E. (2018). Training non-native consonant production with perceptual and articulatory cues. Phonetica, 77, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, K. & Simonet, M. (2015). Adult second language learning of Spanish vowels. Hispania, 98(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Kochetov, A., & Steele, J. (2021). Articulatory settings and L2 English coronal consonants. Phonetica, 78(4), 273–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colantoni, L., Kochetov, A., & Steele, J. (2023). L1 influence on the L2 acquisition of English word-final nasal place contrasts: An electropalatographic study of L1 Japanese and Spanish learners. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Mascaro, O., Steele, J., & Sunara, S. (2015). Phonological and phonetic aspects of the L2 acquisition of French and Spanish stress. In Willis, E. W., ed., Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L. & Steele, J. (2007). Acquiring /ʁ/ in context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(3), 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L. & Steele, J. (2008). Integrating articulatory constraints into models of second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 489–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, L., Steele, J., & Escudero, P. (2015). Second Language Speech: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Đào, D. M. & Nguyễn, A.-T. T. (2018). L1 Korean vocalic transfer in adult L2 Korean learners’ production of Vietnamese monophthong vowels. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Mora, J. C., & Daidone, D. (2016). The role of inhibitory control in second language phonological processing. Language Learning, 66(4), 741–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, K. J. & Hao, Y.-C. (2018). Featural generalization in second language identification performance: Comparing learners with different L1s. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, K. J., Silbert, N. H., & Park, H. (2009). Generalization across segments in second language consonant identification. Language Learning, 59(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delvaux, V., Huet, K., Piccaluga, M., & Harmegnies, B. (2014). Phonetic compliance: A proof-of-concept study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation Fundamentals. Evidence-Based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz, B., Baus, C., Escera, C., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Brain potentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105(42), 16083–16088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., Escera, C., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2016). Variability in L2 phonemic learning originates from speech-specific capabilities: An MMN study on late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 955–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, O. (2019). Transferring perceptual cue-weighting from second language into first language: Cues to voicing in Russian speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Ryan, S. (2015). The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eads, A., Khater, J., & Mielke, J. (2018). An ultrasound study of emphatics and gutturals. In Alhawary, M. T., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Arabic Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. & Iverson, G. K. (2013). The role of native language phonology in the production of L2 contrasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. (2000). Developmental patterns in the adult L2 acquisition of new contrasts: The acoustic cue weighting in the perception of Scottish tense/lax vowels by Spanish speakers. [Master’s thesis, University of Edinburgh].Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2015). Orthography plays a limited role when learning the phonological forms of new words: The case of Spanish and English learners of novel Dutch words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Lipski, S. C. (2009). Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 452–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. & Wanrooij, K. (2010). The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech, 53(3), 343–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P. & Williams, D. (2012). Native dialect influences second-language vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(5), EL406–EL412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, B. E. & Alshangiti, W. (2018). The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L. & Menke, M. R. (2009). Acquisition of the Spanish voiced spirants by second language learners. In Collentine, J., García, M., Lafford, B., & Marcos Marín, F., eds., Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 39–52.Google Scholar
Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2016). An examination of the different ways that non-native phones may be perceptually assimilated as uncategorized. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139, EL1–EL5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 229–273.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2009). Give input a chance! In Piske, T. & Young-Scholten, M., eds., Input Matters in SLA. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 175–190.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Shirru, C., & Mackay, I. R. A. (2003). Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40, 467–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatbonton, E., Trofimovich, P., & Segalowitz, N. (2011). Ethnic group affiliation and patterns of development of a phonological variable. Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiou, G. P. (2021). Effects of phonetic training on the discrimination of second language sounds by learners with naturalistic access to the second language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50, 707–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, G. P., Perfilieva, N. V., & Tenizi, M. (2020). Vocabulary size leads to better attunement to L2 phonetic differences: Clues from Russian learners of English. Language Learning and Development, 16(4), 382–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiou, G. P. & Themistocleous, C. (2021). Vowel learning in diglossic settings: Evidence from Arabic-Greek learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(1), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghaffarvand Mokari, P. & Werner, S. (2018). Perceptual training of second-language vowels: Does musical ability play a role? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 95–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghaffarvand Mokari, P. & Werner, S. (2019). On the role of cognitive abilities in second language vowel learning. Language and Speech, 62(2), 260–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghosh, S., Fauth, C., Sini, A., & Laprie, Y. (2016). L1-L2 interference: The case of final devoicing of French voiced fricatives in final position by German learners. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2016, 3156–3160. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2016-954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnevsheva, K. (2015). Style-shifting and intra-speaker variation in the vowel production of nonnative speakers of New Zealand English. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grantham O’Brien, M. & Smith, L. C. (2010). Role of first language dialect in the production of second language German vowels. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48, 297–330.Google Scholar
Grover, V., Shafer, V. L., Campanelli, L., Whalen, D. H., & Levy, E. S. (2021). Perception of American English consonants /v/ and /w/ by Hindi speakers of English. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7(3), 370–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, J. F., Smith, B. L., & Johnson, E. M. (2017). Utilizing electropalatography to train palatalized versus unpalatalized consonant productions by native speakers of American English learning Russian. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(1), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, J. F., Smith, B. L., Nissen, S. L., & Allen, H. (2016). Russian palatalized and unpalatalized coda consonants: An electropalatographic and acoustic analysis of native speaker and L2 learner productions. Journal of Phonetics, 54, 98–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J.-I., Hwang, J.-B., & Choi, T.-H. (2011). The acquisition of phonetic details: Evidence from the production of English reduced vowels by Korean learners. Second Language Research, 27(4), 535–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J.-I. & Kim, J.-Y. (2017). The influence of orthography on the production of alphabetic, second-language allophones by speakers of a non-alphabetic language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 963–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardison, D. M. & Motohashi Saigo, M. (2010). Development of perception of second language Japanese geminates: Role of duration, sonority, and segmentation strategy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, M. (2011). The effect of perceptual training including required lexical access and meaningful linguistic context on second language phonology. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Utah].Google Scholar
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Faulker, A., et al. (2006). The use of visual cues in the perception of non-native consonant contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1740–1751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M., & Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47, 360–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, J. J. (2015a). A longitudinal study of the second language acquisition of a three-way stop contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 50, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, J. J. (2015b). Second language experience can hinder the discrimination of nonnative phonological contrasts. Phonetica, 73, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W., Tao, S., Li, M., & Liu, C. (2016). Distinctiveness and assimilation in vowel perception in a second language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62, 4534–4543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huensch, A. & Tremblay, A. (2015). Effects of perceptual phonetic training on the perception and production of second language syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2016). Effects of perceptual training on second language vowel perception and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1175–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2019). Individual differences in L2 speech perception: The role of phonological memory and lipreading ability. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 782–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2021). Language experience and subjective word familiarity on the multimodal perception of non-native vowels. Language and Speech, 65(1), 173–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, K. (2012). Perception of place-of-articulation contrasts of English word-final consonants in connected speech by Japanese adult L2 learners. [Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York].Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Ekanayake, D., Hamann, S., Sennema, A., & Evans, B. G. (2008). Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: An examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1305–1316.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Pinet, M., & Evans, B. G. (2011). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakoby, H., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. (2011). Electrophysiological correlates of speech perception mechanisms and individual differences in second language attainment. Psychophysiology, 48, 1516–1530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jekiel, M. & Malarski, K. (2021). Musical hearing and musical experience in second language English vowel acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64, 1666–1682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kachlickaa, M., Saito, K., & Tierney, A. (2019). Successful second language learning is tied to robust domain-general auditory processing and stable neural representation of sound. Brain and Language, 192, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kar-man Shum, K., Au, T. K., Romo, L. F., & Jun, S.-A. (2021). Learning challenging L2 sounds via computer training: High-variability perceptual training for children and adults. Language Learning and Development, 17(4), 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartushina, N. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2014). On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 817–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kartushina, N. & Martin, C. D. (2019). Third-language learning affects bilinguals’ production in both their native languages: A longitudinal study of dynamic changes in L1, L2 and L3 vowel production. Journal of Phonetics, 77, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Clayards, M., & Goad, H. (2017). Individual differences in second language speech perception across tasks and contrasts: The case of English vowel contrasts by Korean learners. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), 20160025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Clayards, M., & Goad, H. (2018). A longitudinal study of individual differences in the acquisition of new vowel contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 67, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. H. & Hazan, V. (2010). Individual variability in the perceptual learning of L2 speech sounds and its cognitive correlates. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., Wrembel, M., & Kul, M., eds., Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds 2010. Poznan: Poznan University, pp. 251–256.Google Scholar
Kivistö-de Souza, H., Carlet, A., Julkowska, I. A., & Rato, A. (2020). Vowel inventory size matters: Assessing cue-weighting in L2 vowel perception. Ilha do Desterro, 70(3), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kkese, E. & Petinou, K. (2017). Perception abilities of L1 Cypriot Greek listeners – Types of errors involving plosive consonants in L2 English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lababidi, Z. (2016). The L2 perceptual mapping of Arabic and English consonants by American English listeners. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee].Google Scholar
Lai, Y.-H. (2012). Perceptual processing of Mandarin nasals by L1 and L2 Mandarin speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A. H. & Lyster, R. (2016). Effects of different types of corrective feedback on receptive skills in a second language: A speech perception training study. Language Learning, 66(4), 809–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. H. & Lyster, R. (2017). Can corrective feedback on second language speech perception errors affect production accuracy? Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lengeris, A. (2018). Computer-based auditory training improves second-language vowel production in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), EL165–EL171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lengeris, A. & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–3768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerdpaisalwong, S. (2015). Perception training of Thai learners: American English consonants and vowels. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee].Google Scholar
Levy, E. S. & Law II, F. F. (2010). Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1290–1305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, E. S. & Strange, W. (2008). Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. J., Ayala, S., Harrel, D., Shiller, D. M., & McAllister, T. (2019). Individual predictors of response to biofeedback training for second-language production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(6), 4625–4643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y., Best, C., Cao, C., & Zhang, J. (2019). Hybrid perceptual training to facilitate the learning of nasal final contrasts by highly proficient Japanese learners of Mandarin. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P., eds., Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, pp. 2567–2571.Google Scholar
Lin, S., Cychosz, M., Shen., A., & Cibelli, E. (2019). The effects of phonetic training and visual feedback on novel contrast production. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P., eds., Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, pp. 899–903.Google Scholar
Linebaugh, G. & Roche, T. (2015). Evidence that L2 production training can enhance perception. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 9(1), A1–A17.Google Scholar
Lopez-Soto, T. & Kewley-Port, D. (2009). Relation of perception training to production of codas in English as a second language. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 6, 062003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinescu, I. (2013). Native dialect effects in non-native production: Cuban and Peninsular learners of English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 58(3), 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, R. M., Goad, H., & Dow, M. (2023). L1 phonological effects on L2 (non-)naïve vowel perception: A cross-language investigation of the oral-nasal vowel contrast in Brazilian Portuguese. Second Language Research, 39(2), 387–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, L. (2016). The influence of foreign scripts on the acquisition of a second language phonological contrast. Second Language Research, 32(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, M. R. & Face, T. L. (2010). Second language Spanish vowel production: An acoustic analysis. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3(1), 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, C. M. (2017). Individual differences and linguistic factors in the development of mid vowels in L2 Spanish learners: A longitudinal study. [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University].Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2013). Foreign Accent: The Phenomenon of Non-native Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. (2017). Individual developmental trajectories in the L2 acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 218–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimz, K. & Khattab, G. (2020). On the role of orthography in L2 vowel production: The case of Polish learners of German. Second Language Research, 36(4), 623–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuno, T. & Hardison, D. H. (2016). Perception-production link in L2 Japanese vowel duration: Training with technology. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 61–80.Google Scholar
Olson, D. J. (2019). Feature acquisition in second language phonetic development: Evidence from phonetic training. Language Learning, 69(2), 366–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H. & de Jong, K. J. (2008). Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean prevocalic obstruents: Evidence from mapping effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 704–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H. & de Jong, K. J. (2017). Perceptual category mapping between English and Korean obstruents in non-CV positions: Prosodic location effects in second language identification skills. Journal of Phonetics, 62, 12–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patience, M. (2022). Articulatory difficulty in L2 Spanish. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto].Google Scholar
Patience, M. & Steele, J. (2023). Relative difficulty in the acquisition of the phonetic parameters of obstruent coda voicing: Evidence from Mandarin-speaking learners of French. Language and Speech, 66(3), 625–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rallo Fabra, L. (2015). Can nonnative speakers reduce English vowels in a native-like fashion? Evidence from L1-Spanish L2-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 72, 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rato, A. (2014). Effects of perceptual training on the identification of English vowels by native speakers of European Portuguese. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech: Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 529–546. https://doe.concordia.ca/copal/documents/34_Rato_Vol5.pdf.Google Scholar
Rau, D. V., Chang, H.-H. A., & Tarone, E. (2009). Think or sink: Chinese learners’ acquisition of the English voiceless interdental fricative. Language Learning, 59(3), 581–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanelli, S., Menegotto, A., & Smyth, R. (2018). Stress-induced acoustic variation in L2 and L1 Spanish vowels. Phonetica, 75, 190–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roon, K. D., Kang, J., & Whalen, D. H. (2020). Effects of ultrasound familiarization on production and perception of nonnative contrasts. Phonetica, 77, 350–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, K. & Munro, M. (2014). The early phase of /ɹ/ production: Development in adult Japanese learners of English. Language and Speech, 57(4), 451–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, K. & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, M. & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayako Earle, F. & Meyers, E. B. (2015). Sleep and native language interference affect non-native speech sound learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1680–1695.Google Scholar
Schertz, J., Cho, T., Lotto, A., & Warner, N. (2015). Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 183–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schertz, J. & Clare, E. J. (2019). Phonetic cue weighting in perception and production. WIREs Cognitive Science, 11, e1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, A. M. (2012). Effects of EPG treatment for English consonant contrasts on L2 perception and production. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26(11–12), 909–925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, C. (2021). Spanish speakers’ English schwar production: Does orthography play a role? Applied Psycholinguistics, 42, 1377–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, C. E. & Curtin, S. (2011). Experience, representations and the production of second language allophones. Second Language Research, 27(2), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, C. & Rannaud, J. (2013). L2 perception of Spanish palatal variants across different tasks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shehata, A. (2015). Talker variability and second language word recognition: A new training study. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(2), 209–230.Google Scholar
Shinohara, Y. & Iverson, P. (2018). High variability identification and discrimination training for Japanese speakers learning English /r/–/l/. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinohara, Y. & Iverson, P. (2021). The effect of age on English /r/-/l/ perceptual training outcomes for Japanese speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 89, 101108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E., Debaene, M., & Van Herreweghe, M. (2015). The effect of L1 regional variation on the perception and production of standard L1 and L2 vowels. Folia Linguistica, 49(2), 521–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E. & D’Hulster, T. (2012). The effect of experience on the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences, 34, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. & Hayes-Harb, R. (2012). Individual differences in the perception of final consonant voicing among native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. L., Hayes-Harb, R., Bruss, M., & Harker, A. (2009). Production and perception of voicing and devoicing in similar German and English word pairs by native speakers of German. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolović-Perović, M., Bassetti, B., & Dillon, S. (2019). English orthographic forms affect L2 English speech production in native users of a non-alphabetic writing system. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 23, 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solier, C., Perret, C., Baqué, L., & Soum-Favaro, C. (2019). Written training tasks are better than oral training tasks at improving L2 learners’ speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40, 1455–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, M. (2017). Do learners lighten up? Phonetic and allophonic acquisition of Spanish /l/ by English-speaking learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 801–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solon, M., Long, A.-Y., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2017). Task complexity, language-related episodes, and production of L2 Spanish vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 347–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart Morrison, G. (2008). L1-Spanish speakers’ acquisition of the English /i/–/ɪ/ contrast: Duration-based perception is not the initial developmental stage. Language and Speech, 54(1), 285–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2014). Effects of age of learning on voice onset time: Categorical perception of Swedish stops by near-native L2 speakers. Language and Speech, 57(4), 425–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2015). Effects of age and speaking rate on voice onset time: The production of voiceless stops by near-native L2 speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suemitsu, A., Dang, J., Ito, T., & Tiede, M. (2015). A real-time articulatory visual feedback approach with target presentation for second language pronunciation learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(4), EL382–EL387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Święciński, R. (2013). An EMA study of articulatory settings in Polish speakers of English. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. & Shockey, L. R., eds., Teaching and Researching English Accents in Native and Non-native Speakers. Berlin: Springer, pp. 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tateishi, M. & Winters, S. (2013). Does ultrasound training lead to improved perception of a nonnative sound contrast? Evidence from Japanese learners of English. In Luo, S., ed., Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa: Canadian Linguistics Association, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. I. (2012). Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 62(4), 1231–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R. I. & Isaacs, T. (2009). Within-category variation in L2 English vowel learning. Canadian Acoustics, 37(3), 138–139.Google Scholar
Tsukada, K. (2009). Durational characteristics of English vowels produced by Japanese and Thai second language (L2) learners. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 29(2), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, K. O. C. & Baker-Smemoe, W. (2013). An investigation of the production of ejectives by native (L1) and second (L2) language speakers of Q’eqchi’ Mayan. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanrooij, K., Escudero, P., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2013). What do listeners learn from exposure to a vowel distribution? An analysis of listening strategies in distributional learning. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, I. & Kanada, S. (2014). Pre-speech postures of second-language versus first-language speakers. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 18(2), 106–109.Google Scholar
Yang, C. & Lu, A. C. L. (2019). The acquisition of Mandarin affricates by American second language learners. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 91–122.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. & Chen, X. (2019). Within-organ contrast in second language perception: The perception of Russian initial /r-l/ contrast by Chinese learners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146, EL117–EL123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y., Chen, X., & Xiao, Q. (2022). Cross-linguistic similarity in L2 speech learning: Evidence from the acquisition of Russian stop contrasts by Mandarin speakers. Second Language Research, 38(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazawa, K., Whang, J., Kondo, M., & Escudero, P. (2020). Language-dependent cue weighting: An investigation of perception modes in L2 learning. Second Language Research, 36(4), 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., et al. (2010). Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1319–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X., Cheng, B., & Zhang, Y. (2021). The role of talker variability in nonnative phonetic learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64, 4802–4825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Adams, J. & Hellmuth, S. (2022). Taiwanese and Beijing Mandarin listeners’ perception of English focus prosody. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2022, pp. 744–748. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anya, U. (2021). Critical race pedagogy for more effective and inclusive world language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 42(6), 1055–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, M., Breen, M., Gooden, S., Levon, E., & Yu, K. M., eds. (2022). Sociolectal and dialectal variation in prosody [special issue]. Language and Speech, 65(4), 783–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arvaniti, A. (2009). Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arvaniti, A. (2012). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwasi, M. M. (2021). Education, multilingualism and bilingualism in Botswana. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(267–268), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baills, F. (2022). Using the hands to embody prosody boosts phonological learning in a foreign language. [Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra].Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. & Niebuhr, O. (2020). Persuasive speech is a matter of acoustics and chest breathing only. In Elmentaler, M. & Niebuhr, O., eds., An den Rändern der Sprache. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 551–578.Google Scholar
Barry, W., Andreeva, B., & Koreman, J. (2009). Do rhythm measures reflect perceived rhythm? Phonetica, 66(1–2), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckman, M. E., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J. T., & Morgan, T. A. (2002). Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices Framework. Probus, 14(1), 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2006). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI system. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–54.Google Scholar
Benet, A., Gabriel, C., Kireva, E., & Pešková, A. (2012). Prosodic transfer from Italian to Spanish: Rhythmic properties of L2 speech and Argentinean Porteño. In Ma, Q., Ding, H., & Hirst, D., eds., Speech Prosody 2012. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, pp. 438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruggeman, L. (2016). Native, dominance, and the flexibility of listening to spoken language. [Doctoral dissertation, Western Sydney University].Google Scholar
Bruggeman, L., Yu, J., & Cutler, A. (2022). Listener adjustment of stress cue use to fit language vocabulary structure. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2022, pp. 264–267. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, N., Marmursztejn, M., D’Imperio, M., & Schön, D. (2020). Rhythmic abilities correlate with L2 prosody imitation abilities in typologically different languages. Language and Speech, 63(1), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, W. (2022). Theorizing positive transfer in cross-linguistic speech perception: The acoustical-attentional-contextual hypothesis. Journal of Phonetics, 91, 101–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, W., Tong, X., & Samuel, A. G. (2019). Better than native: Tone language experience enhances second language English lexical stress discrimination in Cantonese-English bilinguals. Cognition, 189, 188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clopper, C. G. & Smiljanic, R. (2011). Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 237–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coetzee, A. W., García-Amaya, L., Henriksen, N., & Wissing, D. (2015). Bilingual speech rhythm: Spanish-Afrikaans in Patagonia. In Wolters, M., Livingstone, J., Beattie, B., Smith, R., MacMahon, M., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scobbie, J. M., eds., Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Science (ICPhS 2015). Glasgow: Glasgow University. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0911.pdf.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L. & Gurlekian, J. (2004). Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J., Hualde, J. I., Smith, C. L., et al. (2019). Sound, structure and meaning: The bases of prominence ratings in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 75, 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45(3), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz, M. (2013). Prosodic variation in EP: Phrasing, intonation and rhythm in Central-Southern varieties. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon].Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (2005). Lexical stress. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E., eds., The Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (2012). Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. & Jesse, A. (2021). Word stress in speech perception. In Pardo, J. S., Nygaard, L. C., Remez, R. E., & Pisoni, D. B., eds., The Handbook of Speech Perception. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Silva Junior, L. J. & Barbosa, P. A. (2019). Speech rhythm of English as L2: An investigation of prosodic variables on the production of Brazilian Portuguese speakers. Journal of Speech Sciences, 8(2), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E. (2020). The Frequency Code and gendered attrition and acquisition in the German-English heritage language community in Vancouver, Canada. In Brehmer, B. & Treffers-Daller, J., eds., Lost in Transmission: The Role of Attrition and Input in Heritage Language Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 230–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellwo, V. (2010). Influences of speech rate on the acoustic correlates of speech rhythm: An experimental phonetic study based on acoustic and perceptual evidence. [Doctoral dissertation, Bonn University].Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastian, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36(3), 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress “deafness” in simultaneous French-Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114(2), 266–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elordieta, G. & Romera, M. (2021). The influence of social factors on the prosody of Spanish in contact with Basque. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(1), 286–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V. & Prieto, P. (2020). Pragmatics and prosody in research on Spanish. In Koike, D. A. & Félix-Brasdefer, J. C., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Pragmatics. New York: Routledge, pp. 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, N. & García, E. S. (2020). Power, language, and bilingual learners. In Nasir, N. S., Lee, C. D., Pea, R., & de Royston, M. McKinney, eds., Handbook of the Cultural Foundations of Learning. New York: Routledge, pp. 178–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, S., Cruz, M., Cardoso, R., et al. (2021). (Dys)Prosody in Parkinson’s disease: Effects of medication and disease duration on intonation and prosodic phrasing. Brain Sciences, 11(8), 1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frota, S. & Vigário, M. (2001). On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: The European/Brazilian Portuguese case. Probus, 13, 247–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, S., Vigário, M., Cruz, M., Hohl, F., & Braun, B. (2022). Amplitude envelope modulations across languages reflect prosody. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2022, pp. 688–692. http://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, C. & Kireva, E. (2014). Prosodic transfer in learner and contact varieties: Speech rhythm and intonation of Buenos Aires Spanish and L2 Castilian Spanish produced by Italian native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasparini, L., Langus, A., Tsuji, S., & Boll-Avetisyan, N. (2021). Quantifying the role of rhythm in infants’ language discrimination abilities: A meta-analysis. Cognition, 213, 104757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gili Fivela, B., Avesani, C., Barone, M., et al. (2015). Intonational phonology of the regional varieties of Italian. In Frota, S. & Prieto, P., eds., Intonation in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 140–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluhareva, D. & Prieto, P. (2017). Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].Google Scholar
Grabe, E. & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 7(1982), 515–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenon, I. & White, L. (2008). Acquiring rhythm: A comparison of L1 and L2 speakers of Canadian English and Japanese. In Chan, H., Jacob, H., & Kapia, E., eds., Proceedings of the 32nd Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 155–166.Google Scholar
Guilbault, C. P. G. (2002). The acquisition of French rhythm by English second language learners. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton].Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1997). Interethnic communication. In Coupland, N. & Jaworski, A., eds., Sociolinguistics. London: Palgrave, pp. 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Phonological and Phonetic Properties of L2 English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. (2012). Rhythm in L2 speech. Speech and Language Technology, 14(15), 83–94.Google Scholar
He, L. (2012). Syllabic intensity variations as quantification of speech rhythm: Evidence from both L1 and L2. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2022, 466–469. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-127263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, N. & Villarreal, D. (2020). Intonational variation and incrementality in listener judgments of ethnicity. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 11(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (2014). Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 520–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1992). Teaching world Englishes. The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures, 2(2), 355–365.Google Scholar
Kang, O. & Kermad, A. (2019). Prosody in L2 pragmatics research. In Taguchi, N., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics. New York: Routledge, pp. 78–92.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Johnson, D. O., & Kermad, A. (2021). Second Language Prosody and Computer Modeling. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawase, S., Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2016). The influence of second language experience on Japanese-accented English rhythm. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016, pp. 746–750. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. & Tremblay, A. (2021). Korean listeners’ processing of suprasegmental lexical contrasts in Korean and English: A cue-based transfer approach. Journal of Phonetics, 87, 101059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. Y. (2020). Discrepancy between heritage speakers’ use of suprasegmental cues in the perception and production of Spanish lexical stress. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, N. & Sheppard, C. (2011). Validating acoustic measures of speech rhythm for second language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, 10861089. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Kinoshita/Kinoshita.pdf.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C., Evanini, K., & Zechner, K. (2013). Applying rhythm metrics to non-native spontaneous speech. In Badin, P., Hueber, T., Bailly, G., Demolin, D., & Raby, F., eds., Proceedings of Speech and Language Technology in Education (SLaTE), Grenoble, France, pp. 159–163. www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/14978203/laiEtAl2012rhythm.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. (2020). Revisiting the intelligibility and nativeness principles. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(3), 310–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, A. & Post, B. (2014). L2 acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm: Evidence from L1 Mandarin and German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. Y., Wang, M., Idsardi, W. J., & Xu, Y. I. (2014). Stress processing in Mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 316–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llisterri, J. & Schwab, S. (2019). Perception of lexical stress in Spanish L2 by French speakers. In Gibson, M. & Gil, J., eds., Romance Phonetics and Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 177–190.Google Scholar
Mennen, I. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In Delais-Roussaire, E., Avanzi, M., & Herment, S., eds., Prosody and Language in Contact. Berlin: Springer, pp. 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I., Reubold, U., Endes, K., & Mayr, R. (2022). Plasticity of native intonation in the L1 of English migrants to Austria. Languages, 7(3), 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murty, L., Otake, T., & Cutler, A. (2007). Perceptual tests of rhythmic similarity: I. Mora rhythm. Language and Speech, 50(1), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagao, J. & Ortega-Llebaria, M. (2021). The interaction of micro- and macro-rhythm measures in English and Japanese as first and second languages. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI), pp. 273–277. https://doi.org/10.21437/TAI.2021-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 756–766.Google ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T. & Ramus, F. (2003). Perception and acquisition of linguistic rhythm by infants. Speech Communication, 41(1), 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, O., Thumm, J., & Michalsky, J. (2018). Shapes and timing in charismatic speech: Evidence from sounds and melodies. In Klessa, K., Bachan, J., Wagner, A., Karpiński, M., and Śledziński, D., eds., Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody. International Speech Communication Association, pp. 582–586. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-118.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F₀ of voice. Phonetica, 41(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordin, M. & Mennen, I. (2015). Comparison of fundamental frequency in Welsh and English in bilingual speech. In Wolters, M., Livingstone, J., Beattie, B., Smith, R., MacMahon, M., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scobbie, J. M., eds., Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015). Glasgow: Glasgow University. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0148.pdf.Google Scholar
Ordin, M. & Mennen, I. (2017). Cross-linguistic differences in bilinguals’ fundamental frequency ranges. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6), 1493–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ordin, M. & Polyanskaya, L. (2015). Acquisition of speech rhythm in a second language by learners with rhythmically different native languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orrico, R. & D’Imperio, M. (2020). Individual empathy levels affect gradual intonation-meaning mapping: The case of biased questions in Salerno Italian. Laboratory Phonology, 11(1), 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M. & Colantoni, L. (2014). L2 English intonation: Relations between form-meaning associations, access to meaning, and L1 transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Gu, H., & Fan, J. (2013). English speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3–4), 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Nemogá, M., & Presson, N. (2017). Long-term experience with a tonal language shapes the perception of intonation in English words: How Chinese-English bilinguals perceive “Rose?” vs. “Rose.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M. & Wu, Z. (2021). Chinese-English speakers’ perception of pitch in their non-tonal language: Reinterpreting English as a tonal-like language. Language and Speech, 64(2), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortín, R. (2022). Spanish heritage speakers’ processing of lexical stress. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortín, R. & Simonet, M. (2022). Phonological processing of stress by native English speakers learning Spanish as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 460–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortín, R. & Simonet, M. (2023). Perceptual sensitivity to stress in native English speakers learning Spanish as a second language. Laboratory Phonology, 14(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozaki, Y., Yazawa, K., & Kondo, M. (2017). L2 English speech rhythm of Japanese speakers: An alternative implementation of the Varco metrics. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference UCL, 84–88.Google Scholar
Parera, A. F. & Lynch, A. (2021). The effects of explicit instruction on written accent mark usage in basic and intermediate Spanish heritage language courses. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 8(1), 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrino, E., Schwab, S., & Dellwo, V. (2021). Native listeners rely on rhythmic cues when deciding on the nativeness of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 150(4), 2836–2853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, S. H., Chan, M. K., Tseng, C. Y., et al. (2005). Towards a Pan-Mandarin system for prosodic transcription. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 230–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Dupoux, E. (2010). Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. & Assaneo, M. F. (2020). Speech rhythms and their neural foundations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(6), 322–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polyanskaya, L., Busà, M. G., & Ordin, M. (2020). Capturing cross-linguistic differences in macro-rhythm: The case of Italian and English. Language and Speech, 63(2), 242–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prieto, P., del Mar Vanrell, M., Astruc, L., Payne, E., & Post, B. (2012). Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm. Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Communication, 54(6), 681–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, P. & Roseano, P., eds. (2010). Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Quené, H., Orr, R., Campbell, N., Gibbon, D., & Hirst, D. (2014). Long-term convergence of speech rhythm in L1 and L2 English. Social and Linguistic Speech Prosody, 7, 342–345.Google Scholar
Qin, Z., Chien, Y. F., & Tremblay, A. (2017). Processing of word-level stress by Mandarin-speaking second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(3), 541–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73(3), 265–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, R. (2019). The phonological system of adult heritage speakers of Spanish in the United States. In Colina, S. & Martínez-Gil, F., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Phonology. New York: Routledge, pp. 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, R., Ye, T., & Butera, B. (2022). The prosodic expression of sarcasm vs. sincerity by heritage speakers of Spanish. Languages, 7(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathcke, T., Lin, C. Y., Falk, S., & Bella, S. D. (2021). Tapping into linguistic rhythm. Laboratory Phonology, 12(1), article 11, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romera, M. & Elordieta, G. (2013). Prosodic accommodation in language contact: Spanish intonation in Majorca. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 221, 127–151.Google Scholar
Romera, M. & Elordieta, G. (2020). Information-seeking question intonation in Basque Spanish and its correlation with degree of contact and language attitudes. Languages, 5(4), 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, J. & Flores, N. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 46(5), 621–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saalfeld, A. K. (2012). Teaching L2 Spanish stress. Foreign Language Annals, 45(2), 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebina, B., Setter, J., & Daller, M. (2021). The Setswana speech rhythm of 6–7 year-old Setswana-English bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(3), 592–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shook, A. & Marian, V. (2016). The influence of native-language tones on lexical access in the second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(6), 3102–3109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonet, M. (2008). Language contact in Majorca: An experimental sociophonetic approach. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign].Google Scholar
Soler, J. & Morales-Galvez, S. (2022). Linguistic justice and global English: Theoretical and empirical approaches. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2022(277), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Hirsch, K., & Kang, O. (2022). Development of prosody in pragmatics meaning-making: Prosodic changes in L2 speech acts and contributing factors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(3), 843–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Maastricht, L., Krahmer, E., Swerts, M., & Prieto, P. (2019). Learning direction matters: A study on L2 rhythm acquisition by Dutch learners of Spanish and Spanish learners of Dutch. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 87–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. (2021). Beyond segments: Towards a lexical model for tonal bilinguals. Journal of Second Language Studies, 4(2), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Wang, J., & Malins, J. (2017). Do you hear “feather” when listening to “rain”? Lexical tone activation during unconscious translation: Evidence from Mandarin-English bilinguals. Cognition, 169, 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, S. & Goss, S. (2018). Perceptual assimilation of non-native prosodic cues: Cross-linguistic effects of lexical F0 learning. In Klessa, K., Bachan, J., Wagner, A., Karpiński, M., and Śledziński, D., eds., Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody. International Speech Communication Association, pp. 947–951. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-191.Google Scholar
Wiener, S. & Goss, S. (2019). Second and third language learners’ sensitivity to Japanese pitch accent is additive: An information-based model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 897–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Oh, G. E., Hübscher, I., et al. (2021). Rethinking the frequency code: A meta-analytic review of the role of acoustic body size in communicative phenomena. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1840), 20200400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y., Chen, S.-W., & Wang, B. (2012). Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression (PFC): A typological divide within the same language family? Linguistic Review, 29, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, vol. 33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. & Nava, E. (2011). Encoding discourse-based meaning: Prosody vs. syntax. Implications for second language acquisition. Lingua, 121(4), 652–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×