Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:18:07.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - The Speech Perception of Bilingual Adults

from Part IV - The Phonetics and Phonology of the Bilingual Adult

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Mark Antoniou
Edited by
Mark Amengual
Mark Amengual
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

This chapter outlines studies within the domain of speech perception by bilingual adult listeners. I first discuss studies that have examined bilinguals’ perception of L1 and/or L2 speech segments, as well as those that have tested perception of unfamiliar, non-native speech segments. In turn, I examine each of the factors that are known to affect bilinguals’ perception of speech, which include age of L2 acquisition, effects of L1:L2 usage as they pertain to language dominance and proficiency, and short-term contextual effects on speech perception. I also provide an overview of the literature on bilinguals’ perception of suprasegmentals. Finally, I explore what I think are some of the crucial questions facing the field of bilingual speech perception.

Keywords

bilingualismadultsnativenon-nativespeech perceptionphoneticsphonologysuprasegmentals
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology , pp. 385 - 406
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24(4), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amengual, M. & Chamorro, P. (2015). The effects of language dominance in the perception and production of the Galician mid vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 72(4), 207–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2013). Focusing the lens of language experience: Perception of Ma’di stops by Greek and English bilinguals and monolinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, 2397–2411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2015). The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, M., Tyler, M. D., & Best, C. T. (2012). Two ways to listen: Do L2-dominant bilinguals perceive stop voicing according to language mode? Journal of Phonetics, 40, 582–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antoniou, M., Wong, P. C. M., & Wang, S. (2015). The effect of intensified language exposure on accommodating talker variability. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58, 722–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 171–204.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2018). Plasticity, variability and age in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. Austin: COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual.Google Scholar
Blasingame, M. & Bradlow, A. R. (2020). Early versus extended exposure in speech perception learning: Evidence from switched-dominance bilinguals. Languages, 5(4), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5040039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. & Flege, J. E. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11(3), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, L., Costa, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(2), 189–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brière, E. J. (1966). An investigation of phonological interference. Language, 42(4), 768–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broersma, M. (2005). Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(6), 3890–3901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broersma, M. (2008). Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2), 712–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broersma, M. (2010). Perception of final fricative voicing: Native and nonnative listeners’ use of vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), 1636–1644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bylund, E., Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2021). Age of acquisition – not bilingualism – is the primary determinant of less than nativelike L2 ultimate attainment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(1), 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, J. (2015). Production and perception of the /i/-/ɪ/ vowel contrast: The case of L2-dominant early learners of English. Phonetica, 72(2–3), 182–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, C. B. & Kwon, S. (2020). The contributions of crosslinguistic influence and individual differences to nonnative speech perception. Languages, 5(4), 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvin, A. & Phillips, N. A. (2022). Bilinguals show proportionally greater benefit from visual speech cues and sentence context in their second compared to their first language. Ear and Hearing, 43(4), 1316–1326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J., Best, C. T., & Antoniou, M. (2020). Native phonological and phonetic influences in perceptual assimilation of monosyllabic Thai lexical tones by Mandarin and Vietnamese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 83, 101013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (2009). Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(6), 3522–3525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A. (2012). Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1992). The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 381–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duñabeitia, J. A., Baciero, A., Antoniou, K., et al. (2022). The Multilingual Picture Database. Scientific Data, 9, 431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elman, J. L., Diehl, R. L., & Buchwald, S. E. (1977). Perceptual switching in bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faris, M. M., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(3), 1589–1608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 233–277.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R., ed., Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & MacKay, I. R. A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(4), 567–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M. R., Blumenfeld, H. K., Carlson, M. T., & Marian, V. (2022). First-language influence on second language speech perception depends on task demands. Language and Speech, 65(1), 28–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Sierra, A., Ramírez-Esparza, N., & Kuhl, P. K. (2016). Relationships between quantity of language input and brain responses in bilingual and monolingual infants. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 110, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Sierra, A., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Silva-Pereyra, J., Siard, J., & Champlin, C. A. (2012). Assessing the double phonemic representation in bilingual speakers of Spanish and English: An electrophysiological study. Brain and Language, 121(3), 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N., eds., Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with Two Languages: An Introduction to Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1988). Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3(3), 233–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying Bilinguals. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2016). The complementarity principle and its impact on processing, acquisition, and dominance. In Silva-Corvalán, C. & Treffers-Daller, J., eds., Language Dominance in Bilinguals: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 66–84.Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R. & Cheng, H.-W. (2016). The influence of the Pinyin and Zhuyin writing systems on the acquisition of Mandarin word forms by native English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalashnikova, M. & Carreiras, M. (2022). Input quality and speech perception development in bilingual infants’ first year of life. Child Development, 93(1), e32–e46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolers, P. A. (1966). Reading and talking bilingually. American Journal of Psychology, 79(3), 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. (1996). Spoken word recognition of code-switched words by Chinese-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(6), 757–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. Y., Wang, M., Idsardi, W. J., & Xu, Y. (2014). Stress processing in Mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 316–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luk, G. & Bialystok, E. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, M. (1989). Consonant and vowel perception and production: Early English-French bilinguals and English monolinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(2), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, I. R. A., Flege, J. E., Piske, T., & Schirru, C. (2001). Category restructuring during second-language speech acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1), 516–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. L. (1971). Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(5), 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayberry, R. I. & Kluender, R. (2018). Rethinking the critical period for language: New insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 886–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKelvie-Sebileau, P. & Davis, C. (2014). Discrimination of foreign language speech contrasts by English monolinguals and French/English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(5), 3025–3035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melguy, Y. V. (2017). Exploring the bilingual phonological space: Early bilinguals’ discrimination of coronal stop contrasts. Language and Speech, 61(2), 173–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, C., Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64(3), B9–B17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, C., Colomé, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). The influence of native-language phonology on lexical access: Exemplar-based versus abstract lexical entries. Psychological Science, 12(6), 445–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peperkamp, S. (2004). Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception. Language, 80(1), 98–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2008). A typological study of stress “deafness.” In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Laboratory Phonology 7. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 203–240.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Dupoux, E. (2010). Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, A. & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2019). Speech perception in bilingual contexts: Neuropsychological impact of mixing languages at the inter-sentential level. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, F., Bosch, L., & Lewkowicz, D. J. (2015). Bilingualism modulates infants’ selective attention to the mouth of a talking face. Psychological Science, 26(4), 490–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramon-Casas, M., Swingley, D., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2009). Vowel categorization during word recognition in bilingual toddlers. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 96–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Echeverría, S., & Bosch, L. (2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 240–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D. & Leśniewska, J. (2021). The critical period hypothesis for L2 acquisition: An unfalsifiable embarrassment? Languages, 6(3), 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stringer, L. & Iverson, P. (2020). Non-native speech recognition sentences: A new materials set for non-native speech perception research. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 561–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremblay, A. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 553–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(1), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. ([1939] 1969). Principles of Phonology (trans. C. A. M. Baltaxe). Berkeley, CA: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in Contact. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1977). The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(4), 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, R., Jiao, L., Wang, M., & Wei, H. (2023). The influence of L2 experience on L1 speech perception: Evidence from Mandarin-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 27(5), 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×