Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:34:51.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - The Speech Production of Bilingual Adults

from Part IV - The Phonetics and Phonology of the Bilingual Adult

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Joseph V. Casillas
Edited by
Mark Amengual
Mark Amengual
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

Adults undertaking the endeavor of learning a new language can attest to the difficulty involved with producing the sounds and prosody of the target language. A principal aim of research on adult speech production is to comprehend the mechanisms and processes that differentiate adult bilingual speech development from bilingual speech that develops earlier in life. It is clear that individuals who learn an additional language in adulthood typically encounter some difficulties that early learners do not. In particular, these difficulties arise at the segmental level when acquiring novel sound categories and novel sound contrasts, as well as at the suprasegmental level when learning to produce non-native prosodic structures related to intonation, stress, rhythm, tone, and tempo. The present chapter provides a selective overview of the current state-of-the-art in adult bilingual speech production. Furthermore, this chapter considers theoretical and methodological areas for improvement, as well as avenues for future research.

Keywords

speech productionsecond language acquisitionlearning contextsL2 pronunciationphonetic categoriesL2 phoneticsaccentsadult language learningindividual differencesultimate attainmentlanguage inputlanguage useopen sciencereproducible researchlongitudinal research
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Phonetics and Phonology , pp. 407 - 425
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. D. & Feldman, S. (1985). Multiple Regression in Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, L. & Ramon-Casas, M. (2011). Variability in vowel production by bilingual speakers: Can input properties hinder the early stabilization of contrastive categories? Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 514–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (2020). Power considerations in bilingualism research: Time to step up our game. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(5), 813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(2), 421–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casillas, J. V. (2015). Production and perception of the /i/-/ɪ/ vowel contrast: The case of L2-dominant early learners of English. Phonetica, 72(2–3), 182–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casillas, J. V. (2019). Semantic processing triggers cross-linguistic interference during early phonetic category development. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P., eds., Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia, pp. 3348–3352. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_3397.pdf.Google Scholar
Casillas, J. V. (2020a). Phonetic category formation is perceptually driven during the early stages of adult L2 development. Language and Speech, 63(3), 550–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casillas, J. V. (2020b). The longitudinal development of fine-phonetic detail: Stop production in a domestic immersion program. Language Learning, 70(3), 768–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casillas, J. V. & Simonet, M. (2016). Production and perception of the English /æ/–/ɑ/ contrast in switched-dominance speakers. Second Language Research, 32(2), 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2013). A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22(3), 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, E., Stockall, L., Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., & Gorba Masip, C. (2021). Illusory vowels in Spanish-English sequential bilinguals: Evidence that accurate L2 perception is neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate L2 production. Second Language Research, 37(4), 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dı́az-Campos, M. (2004). Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 249–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dı́az-Campos, M. (2006). The effect of style in second language phonology: An analysis of segmental acquisition in study abroad and regular-classroom students. In Klee, C. A. & Face, T. L., eds., Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 26–39.Google Scholar
Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, P. D. (2010). The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvin, J., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2016). The relationship between perception and production of Brazilian Portuguese vowels in European Spanish monolinguals. Loquens: Spanish Journal of Speech Sciences, 3, 1–10.Google Scholar
Evans, B. G. & Alshangiti, W. (2018). The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L. (2018a). Ultimate attainment in Spanish spirantization: The case of U.S.-born immigrants in Spain. Spanish in Context, 15(1), 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L. (2018b). Ultimate attainment of Spanish rhotics by native English-speaking immigrants to Spain. Language and Migration, 2, 57–80.Google Scholar
Face, T. L. (2021). Ultimate attainment of Spanish laterals by native English-speaking immigrants in Spain. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition, 9, 167–180.Google Scholar
Face, T. L. & Menke, M. (2020). L2 acquisition of Spanish VOT by English-speaking immigrants in Spain. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 13(2), 361–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 229–273.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In Burmeister, T., Piske, T., & Rohde, A., eds., An Integrated View of Language Development: Papers in Honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher, pp. 217–244.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Meyer, A. S. & Schiller, N. O., eds., Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production Differences and Similarities. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 319–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2012). The role of input in second language (L2) speech learning. In Proceedings of the VIth International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English. Łódź, Poland. https://bit.ly/4aOKRtl.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R., ed., Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Eefting, W. (1988). Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: Evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(2), 729–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., Walley, A. C., & Randazza, L. A. (1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(2), 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 708–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F. (1995). Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A. & Loken, E. (2014). The statistical crisis in science: Data-dependent analysis – a “garden of forking paths” – explains why many statistically significant comparisons don’t hold up. American Scientist, 102(6), 460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Bueno, M. (1997). Voice onset time in the perception of foreign accent by native listeners of Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 35(4), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorba, C. & Cebrian, J. (2021). The role of L2 experience in L1 and L2 perception and production of voiceless stops by English learners of Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 88, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, E., Engstler, C., & Goldrick, M. (2013). Phonetic processing of non-native speech in semantic vs non-semantic tasks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(6), EL506–EL512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herd, W. J., Walden, R. L., Knight, W. L., & Alexander, S. N. (2015). Phonetic drift in a first language dominant environment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2384–2384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, J. J. (2015). A longitudinal study of the second language acquisition of a three-way stop contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 50, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, M. K. & Schuhmann, K. (2015a). Effect of early L2 learning on L1 stop voicing. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 23(1), 060007.Google Scholar
Huffman, M. K. & Schuhmann, K. (2015b). Individual differences in phonetic drift by English-speaking learners of Spanish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(4), 2268–2268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kartushina, N. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2014). On the effects of L2 perception and of individual differences in L1 production on L2 pronunciation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingston, J. & Diehl, R. L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Language, 70, 419–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, B. & Davidson, L. (2019). Effects of exposure and vowel space distribution on phonetic drift: Evidence from American English learners of French. Language and Speech, 62(1), 30–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967a). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967b). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. (1980). Multiple regression. In Lewis-Beck, M., ed., Applied Regression: An Introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L. & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennen, I. (2015). Beyond segments: Towards a L2 intonation learning theory. In Delais-Roussarie, E., Herment, S., & Avanzi, M., eds., Prosody and Language in Contact. Berlin: Springer, pp. 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2019). Second Language Learning Theories. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mora, J. C. & Nadeu, M. (2012). L2 effects on the perception and production of a native vowel contrast in early bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(4), 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2017a). A longitudinal study of voice onset time development in L2 Spanish stops. Applied Linguistics, 54(5), 13–23.Google Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2017b). Individual developmental trajectories in the L2 acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 218–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2021). Assessing the state of the art in longitudinal L2 pronunciation research: Trends and future directions. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7(2), 154–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L., & Baese-Berk, M. M. (2021). Advancing the state of the art in L2 speech perception-production research: Revisiting theoretical assumptions and methodological practices. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 580–605.Google Scholar
Nozari, N., Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). Naming and repetition in aphasia: Steps, routes, and frequency effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 541–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortega, L. (2013). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In May, S., ed., The Multilingual Turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and Bilingual Education. New York: Routledge, pp. 32–53.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S. & Bouchon, C. (2011). The relation between perception and production in L2 phonological processing. In Cosi, P., De Mori, R., Di Fabbrizio, G., & Pieraccini, R., eds., Proceedings of Interspeech 2011. Rundle Mall, SA, Australia: Causal Productions, pp. 161–164. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2011-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (2002). The production of English vowels by fluent early and late Italian-English bilinguals. Phonetica, 59(1), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plonsky, L. & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, R. & Mitleb, F. M. (1983). Segmental features and implementation in acquisition of English by Arabic speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 11(3), 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rallo Fabra, L. & Romero, J. (2012). Native Catalan learners’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, L. J. (2005). Acoustic cues to the perception of segmental phonemes. In Pisoni, D. & Remez, R., eds., The Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotello, C. M., Heit, E., & Dubé, C. (2015). When more data steer us wrong: Replications with the wrong dependent measure perpetuate erroneous conclusions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(4), 944–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakai, M. (2018). Moving towards a bilingual baseline in second language phonetic research. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(1), 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (2005). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (1969). Foreign accents, language acquisition, and cerebral dominance. Language Learning, 19(3–4), 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (1988). A Time to Speak: A Psycholinguistic Inquiry into the Critical Period for Human Speech. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. (1978). Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In Ritchie, W., ed., Second Language Acquisition Research: Issues and Implications. New York: Academic Press, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starns, J. J., Cataldo, A. M., Rotello, C. M. et al. (2019). Assessing theoretical conclusions with blinded inference to investigate a potential inference crisis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(4), 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J. (2001). Study abroad learners’ acquisition of the Spanish voiceless stops. MIFLC (Mountain Interstate Foreign Language Conference) Review, 10, 137–151.Google Scholar
Stölten, K., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2015). Effects of age and speaking rate on voice onset time: The production of voiceless stops by near-native L2 speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(1), 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Baum, S. (2006). Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P. & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P. & Baker, W. (2007). Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of second language speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1969). Principles of Phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Lancker Sidtis, D., Cameron, K., & Sidtis, J. J. (2012). Dramatic effects of speech task on motor and linguistic planning in severely dysfluent Parkinsonian speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26(8), 695–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Leussen, J.-W. & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, T. & Diller, K. (1981). Neurolinguistic considerations on the optimum age for second language learning. In Diller, K., ed., Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×