Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:54:11.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Postcopulatory Adaptations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Edited by
Todd K. Shackelford
Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Oakland University, Michigan
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology , pp. 341 - 518
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Albert, G., & Arnocky, S. (2016). Use of mate retention strategies. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Altgelt, E. E., & Meltzer, A. L. (2019). Mate-retention behaviours mediate the association between spouses’ attachment insecurity and subsequent partner satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109534.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2013). Can evolutionary principles explain patterns of family violence? Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 403–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, J. (2019). The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews, 94(4), 1381–1415.Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., & Carré, J. M. (2016). Intrasexual rivalry among men. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–8). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., & Locke, A. (2020). Jealousy mediates the link between women’s upward physical appearance comparison and mate retention behaviour. Evolutionary Psychology, 18(4), 1474704920973990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnocky, S., Perilloux, C., Cloud, J. M., Bird, B. M., & Thomas, K. (2016). Envy mediates the link between social comparison and appearance enhancement in women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(2), 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnocky, S., Proietti, V., Ruddick, E. L., Côté, T. R., Ortiz, T. L., Hodson, G., & Carré, J. M. (2019). Aggression toward sexualized women is mediated by decreased perceptions of humanness. Psychological Science, 30(5), 748–756.Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., Ribout, A., Mirza, R. S., & Knack, J. M. (2014). Perceived mate availability influences intrasexual competition, jealousy and mate-guarding behaviour. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 45–64.Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females’ indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19(2), 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017a). Consideration of cosmetic surgery as part of women’s benefit-provisioning mate retention strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1389.Google Scholar
Atari, M., Barbaro, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Chegeni, R. (2017b). Psychometric evaluation and cultural correlates of the Mate Retention Inventory–short form (MRI-SF) in Iran. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704917695267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46(5), 887–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbaro, N. (2020). The nature of attachment systems. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(12), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbaro, N., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Solving the problem of partner infidelity: Individual mate retention, coalitional mate retention, and in-pair copulation frequency. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 67–71.Google Scholar
Barbaro, N., Pham, M. N., Shackelford, T. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2016a). Insecure romantic attachment dimensions and frequency of mate retention behaviours. Personal Relationships, 23(3), 605–618.Google Scholar
Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Atari, M., Shackelford, T. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2019). Romantic attachment and mate retention behaviour: The mediating role of perceived risk of partner infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 940–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbaro, N., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2016b). Mothers and fathers perform more mate retention behaviours than individuals without children. Human Nature, 27(3), 316–333.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2010). Empathizing, systemizing, and the extreme male brain theory of autism. Progress in Brain Research, 186, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batres, C., Russell, R., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., Hansen, A. M., & Cronk, L. (2018). Evidence that makeup is a false signal of sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 148–154.Google Scholar
Bech-Sørensen, J., & Pollet, T. V. (2016). Sex differences in mate preferences: A replication study, 20 years later. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(3), 171–176.Google Scholar
Bilal, A. I., Tilahun, Z., Shimels, T., Gelan, Y. B., & Osman, E. D. (2016). Cosmetics utilization practice in Jigjiga town, Eastern Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study. Cosmetics, 3(4), 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borau, S., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2019). The imaginary intrasexual competition: Advertisements featuring provocative female models trigger women to engage in indirect aggression. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(1), 45–63.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, H. K., Leyva, R. P., Nicolas, S. C., & Hill, S. E. (2019). Costly female appearance-enhancement provides cues of short-term mating effort: The case of cosmetic surgery. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 48–55.Google Scholar
Brase, G. L., & Guy, E. C. (2004). The demographics of mate value and self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(2), 471–484.Google Scholar
Brewer, G., & Abell, L. (2015). Machiavellianism in long-term relationships: Competition, mate retention and sexual coercion. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 357–362.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2011). The evolution of intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 16(5), 411–419.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–256.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioural manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44(1), 322–334.Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7(6), 359–363.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Commitment, love and mate retention. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 419–442). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Caton, N. R., & Horan, S. M. (2019). Deceptive affectionate messages: Mate retention deployed under the threat of partner infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3), 1474704919867902.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, N., Al-Shawaf, L., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Mate competition in Pakistan: Mate value, mate retention, and competitor derogation. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 141–146.Google Scholar
Cloud, J. M., & Perilloux, C. (2014). Bodily attractiveness as a window to women’s fertility and reproductive value. In Weekes-Shackelford, V. & Shackelford, T. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behaviour (pp. 135–152). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Codding, B. F., Bird, R. B., & Bird, D. W. (2011). Provisioning offspring and others: Risk–energy trade-offs and gender differences in hunter–gatherer foraging strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 278(1717), 2502–2509.Google Scholar
Cole, T., & Bruno Teboul, J. C. (2004). Non-zero-sum collaboration, reciprocity, and the preference for similarity: Developing an adaptive model of close relational functioning. Personal Relationships, 11(2), 135–160.Google Scholar
Conlon, K. E. (2019). Mate retention strategies of dominance-oriented and prestige-oriented romantic partners. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5(3), 317–327.Google Scholar
Conroy-Beam, D., Goetz, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2015). Why do humans form long-term mateships? An evolutionary game-theoretic model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–39.Google Scholar
Conroy-Beam, D., Goetz, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). What predicts romantic relationship satisfaction and mate retention intensity: Mate preference fulfillment or mate value discrepancies? Evolution and Human Behaviour, 37(6), 440–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, J. L., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2006). Adolescents tell us why teens have oral sex. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(3), 299–301.Google Scholar
Cross, C. P. (2010). Sex differences in same-sex direct aggression and sociosexuality: The role of risky impulsivity. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(4), 779–792.Google Scholar
Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviours: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 255–271.Google Scholar
Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
Davis, A. C., & Arnocky, S. (2020). An evolutionary perspective on appearance enhancement behaviour. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 51, 3–37.Google Scholar
De Miguel, A., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Mate retention tactics in Spain: Personality, sex differences, and relationship status. Journal of Personality, 79(3), 563–586.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 193–214.Google Scholar
DelPriore, D. J., Bradshaw, H. K., & Hill, S. E. (2018). Appearance enhancement produces a strategic beautification penalty among women. Evolutionary Behavioural Sciences, 12(4), 348.Google Scholar
Dindia, K., & Baxter, L. A. (1987). Strategies for maintaining and repairing marital relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(2), 143–158.Google Scholar
Dittmar, H., Beattie, J., & Friese, S. (1995). Gender identity and material symbols: Objects and decision considerations in impulse purchases. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(3), 491–511.Google Scholar
Dugas, B. (1999). The good old days: A look back at cosmetic surgery. Plastic Surgical Nursing, 19(2), 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J. (1998). The partner-specific investment inventory: An evolutionary approach to individual differences in investment. Journal of Personality, 66, 383–442.Google Scholar
Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. A., & House, D. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: Modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PLoS One, 6(10), e25656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 20–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frederick, D. A., Lever, J., & Peplau, L. A. (2007). Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: Views of men and women across the lifespan. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120(5), 1407–1415.Google Scholar
Frederick, D., Yoshiura, R., and Scott, T. (2016). Cosmetic surgery in the United States. In Naples, N. A. (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies (pp. 1–3). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 55. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghanbarian, E., Hajhosseini, M., Mikani, M., & Mahmoudpour, A. (2020). Differentiation of self and mate retention behaviours: The mediating role of communication patterns. Evolutionary Psychology, 18(4), 1474704920972051.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A., & Mace, R. (2007). Polygyny, reproductive success and child health in rural Ethiopia: Why marry a married man? Journal of Biosocial Science, 39(2), 287–300.Google Scholar
Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2009). Control tactics and partner violence in heterosexual relationships. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 30(6), 445–452.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Attachment-style differences in the experience and expression of romantic jealousy. Personal Relationships, 5(3), 273–291.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behaviour, 49(4), 509–518.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A., Willoughby, B., & Doherty, W. (2012). Reasons for divorce and openness to marital reconciliation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53(6), 453–463.Google Scholar
Hed, H. M. E. (1987). Trends in opportunity for natural selection in the Swedish population during the period 1650–1980. Human Biology, 59, 785–797.Google Scholar
Horan, S. M., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2011). Is it worth lying for? Physiological and emotional implications of recalling deceptive affection. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 78–106.Google Scholar
Hudders, L., De Backer, C., Fisher, M., & Vyncke, P. (2014). The rival wears Prada: Luxury consumption as a female competition strategy. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 570–587.Google Scholar
Hunt, K. A., Fate, J., & Dodds, B. (2011). Cultural and social influences on the perception of beauty: A case analysis of the cosmetics industry. Journal of Business Case Studies (JBCS), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.19030/jbcs.v7i1.1577Google Scholar
Ip, F. W., Lewis, G. J., & Lefevre, C. E. (2019). Carotenoid skin colouration enhances face and body attractiveness: A cross-cultural study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(11), 2565–2573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Buss, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 373–378.Google Scholar
Kaighobadi, F., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Female attractiveness mediates the relationship between in-pair copulation frequency and men’s mate retention behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(4), 293–295.Google Scholar
Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Spousal mate retention in the newlywed year and three years later. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 414–418.Google Scholar
Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Do women pretend orgasm to retain a mate? Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 41(5), 1121–1125.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H. S., Lancaster, J. B., & Anderson, K. G. (1998). Human parental investment and fertility: The life histories of men in Albuquerque. In Booth, A. & Crouter, A. C. (Eds.), Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make? (pp. 55–109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kardum, I., Hudek-Knežević, J., & Gračanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psihologijske Teme, 15(2), 277–296.Google Scholar
Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., Mehić, N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2020). Predicting mate retention behaviours from five-factor personality traits: A dyadic approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110069.Google Scholar
Katrodia, A., Naude, M. J., & Soni, S. (2018). Consumer buying behaviour at shopping malls: Does gender matter? Journal of Economics and Behavioural Studies, 10(1 (J)), 125–134.Google Scholar
Korichi, R., & Pelle-de-Queral, D. (2008). Why women use makeup: Implication of psychological traits in makeup functions. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 59, 127–137.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. L., & Russell, A. F. (2015). Was monogamy a key step on the hominin road? Reevaluating the monogamy hypothesis in the evolution of cooperative breeding. Evolutionary Anthropology, 24, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruger, D. J., Fisher, M. L., Edelstein, R. S., Chopik, W. J., Fitzgerald, C. J., & Strout, S. L. (2013). Was that cheating? Perceptions vary by sex, attachment anxiety, and behaviour. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(1), 159–171.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. (2005). Exploratory analysis of global cosmetic industry: Major players, technology and market trends. Technovation, 25(11), 1263–1272.Google Scholar
Labovitz, G. (2012). “Even Your Mother and Your Mother’s Mother”: Rabbinic literature on women’s usage of cosmetics. Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women’s Studies & Gender. Issues, 23, 12–34.Google Scholar
Leonetti, D. L., Nath, D. C., Hemam, N. S., & Neill, D. B. (2004). Do women really need marital partners for support of their reproductive success? The case of the matrilineal Khasi of NE India. Research in Economic Anthropology, 23, 151–174.Google Scholar
Lindová, J., Klapilová, K., Johnson, D., Vobořilová, A., Chlápková, B., & Havlíček, J. (2019). Non-verbal mate retention behaviour in women and its relation to couple’s relationship adjustment and satisfaction. Ethology, 125(12), 925–939.Google Scholar
Liu, W. Y., Lin, C. C., Lee, Y. S., & Deng, D. J. (2013). On gender differences in consumer behaviour for online financial transaction of cosmetics. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(1–2), 238–253.Google Scholar
Lopes, G. S., & Shackelford, T. K. (2019). Disengaged, exhaustive, benevolent: Three distinct strategies of mate retention. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(9), 2677–2692.Google Scholar
Lopes, G. S., Shackelford, T. K., Santos, W. S., Farias, M. G., & Segundo, D. S. (2016). Mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF): Adaptation to the Brazilian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 36–40.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. O. (2009). Reexamining human origins in light of Ardipithecus ramidus. Science, 326(5949), 74–74e8.Google Scholar
Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., de Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, F. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51(1–3), 45–61.Google Scholar
McKibbin, W. F., Bates, V. M., Shackelford, T. K., Hafen, C. A., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2010). Risk of sperm competition moderates the relationship between men’s satisfaction with their partner and men’s interest in their partner’s copulatory orgasm. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 961–966.Google Scholar
Mileva, V. R., Jones, A. L., Russell, R., & Little, A. C. (2016). Sex differences in the perceived dominance and prestige of women with and without cosmetics. Perception, 45(10), 1166–1183.Google Scholar
Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 214–218.Google Scholar
Mogilski, J. K., Memering, S. L., Welling, L. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Monogamy versus consensual non-monogamy: Alternative approaches to pursuing a strategically pluralistic mating strategy. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 46(2), 407–417.Google Scholar
Mortazavi, S., & Poelker, K. E. (2017). Women in Iran. In Women’s evolving lives (pp. 73–90). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 47(6), 552–567.Google Scholar
Mulhern, R., Fieldman, G., Hussey, T., Lévêque, J. L., & Pineau, P. (2003). Do cosmetics enhance female Caucasian facial attractiveness? International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 25(4), 199–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nascimento, B. S., & Little, A. (2020a). Mate retention behaviours and jealousy in hypothetical mate-poaching situations: Measuring the effects of sex, context, and rivals’ attributes. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6(1), 20–29.Google Scholar
Nascimento, B., & Little, A. (2020b). Relationship satisfaction mediates the association between perceived partner mate retention strategies and relationship commitment. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01045-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opie, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Dunbar, R. I., & Shultz, S. (2013). Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(33), 13328–13332.Google Scholar
Pass, J. A., Lindenberg, S. M., & Park, J. H. (2010). All you need is love: Is the sociometer especially sensitive to one’s mating capacity? European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 221–234.Google Scholar
Pawłowski, B. (2015). Ovulation, concealed. In Whelehan, P. & Bolin, A. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of human sexuality (pp. 831–860). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Pham, M. N., Barbaro, N., Mogilski, J. K., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015a). Coalitional mate retention is correlated positively with friendship quality involving women, but negatively with male–male friendship quality. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 87–90.Google Scholar
Pham, M. N., Barbaro, N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015b). Development and initial validation of the coalitional mate retention inventory. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1(1), 4–12.Google Scholar
Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2013). Oral sex as mate retention behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(2), 185–188.Google Scholar
Pham, M. N., Shackelford, T. K., Holden, C. J., Zeigler-Hill, V., Sela, Y., & Jeffery, A. J. (2015c). Men’s benefit-provisioning mate retention behaviour mediates the relationship between their agreeableness and their oral sex behaviours. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 44(6), 1723–1728.Google Scholar
Rahman, O., Fung, B. C., Chen, Z., Chang, W. L., & Gao, X. (2018). A study of apparel consumer behaviour in China and Taiwan. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(1), 22–33.Google Scholar
Ramshida, A., & Manikandan, K. (2014). Cosmetics usage and its relation to sex, age, and marital status. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 3(3), 46–55.Google Scholar
Reilly, M. J., Tomsic, J. A., Fernandez, S. J., & Davison, S. P. (2015). Effect of facial rejuvenation surgery on perceived attractiveness, femininity, and personality. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 17(3), 202–207.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T., Baumeister, R. F., & Maner, J. K. (2018). Competitive reputation manipulation: Women strategically transmit social information about romantic rivals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 195–209.Google Scholar
Rodseth, L., Wrangham, R. W., Harrigan, A. M., Smuts, B. B., Dare, R., Fox, R., … & Wolpoff, M. H. (1991). The human community as a primate society [and comments]. Current Anthropology, 32(3), 221–254.Google Scholar
Russell, R., Batres, C., Courrèges, S., Kaminski, G., Soppelsa, F., Morizot, F., & Porcheron, A. (2019). Differential effects of makeup on perceived age. British Journal of Psychology, 110(1), 87–100.Google Scholar
Saad, G. (2013). Evolutionary consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 351–371.Google Scholar
Sabanoglu, T. (2019). Monthly amount consumers spend on clothing in the UK 2017, by gender. Statista. Retrieved April 16, 2020, from www.statista.com/statistics/984162/monthly-amount-consumers-spend-on-clothing-uk-by-gender/Google Scholar
Salkicevic, S., Stanic, A. L., & Grabovac, M. T. (2014). Good mates retain us right: Investigating the relationship between mate retention strategies, mate value, and relationship satisfaction. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(5), 147470491401200512.Google Scholar
Scelza, B. A. (2011). Female choice and extra-pair paternity in a traditional human population. Biology Letters, 7(6), 889–891.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: Sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1185.Google Scholar
Schultz, H. (1991). Social differences in mortality in the eighteenth century: An analysis of Berlin church registers. International Review of Social History, 36(2), 232–248.Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 29(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Sela, Y., Mogilski, J. K., Shackelford, T. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Fink, B. (2017). Mate value discrepancy and mate retention behaviours of self and partner. Journal of Personality, 85(5), 730–740.Google Scholar
Sela, Y., Shackelford, T. K., Pham, M. N., & Euler, H. A. (2015a). Do women perform fellatio as a mate retention behaviour? Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 61–66.Google Scholar
Sela, Y., Shackelford, T. K., Pham, M. N., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2015b). Women’s mate retention behaviours, personality traits, and fellatio. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 187–191.Google Scholar
Sell, A., Hone, L. S., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23(1), 30–44.Google Scholar
Seock, Y. K., & Bailey, L. R. (2008). The influence of college students’ shopping orientations and gender differences on online information searches and purchase behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(2), 113–121.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Marital satisfaction and spousal cost-infliction. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(5), 917–928.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 415–425.Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1988). A biased overview of the study of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5(4), 473–501.Google Scholar
Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(2), 217–242.Google Scholar
Stanik, C., Kurzban, R., & Ellsworth, P. (2010). Rejection hurts: The effect of being dumped on subsequent mating efforts. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(4), 682–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephen, I. D., Coetzee, V., & Perrett, D. I. (2011). Carotenoid and melanin pigment coloration affect perceived human health. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 32(3), 216–227.Google Scholar
Štěrbová, Z., & Valentova, J. (2012). Influence of homogamy, complementarity, and sexual imprinting on mate choice. Anthropologie, 50(1), 47–60.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119.Google Scholar
Tan, K. W., Tiddeman, B., & Stephen, I. D. (2018). Skin texture and colour predict perceived health in Asian faces. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 39(3), 320–335.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. E., & Voyer, D. (2014). Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 28(7), 1164–1195.Google Scholar
Thrall, P. H., Antonovics, J., & Bever, J. D. (1997). Sexual transmission of disease and host mating systems: Within-season reproductive success. The American Naturalist, 149, 485–506.Google Scholar
Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(38), 15011–15016.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–170). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T. (2005). Indirect aggression among humans: Social construct or evolutionary adaptation? New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behaviour, 37(6), 569–577.Google Scholar
VanderLaan, D. P., & Vasey, P. L. (2008). Mate retention behaviour of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 37(4), 572–585.Google Scholar
Wagstaff, D. L. (2018). Comparing mating motivations, social processes, and personality as predictors of women’s cosmetics use. Evolutionary Behavioural Sciences, 12(4), 367.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women’s luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 834–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. L., & Frieze, I. H. (2005). Patterns of violent relationships, psychological distress, and marital satisfaction in a national sample of men and women. Sex Roles, 52(11–12), 771–784.Google Scholar
Yamagiwa, J. (2015). Evolution of hominid life history strategy and origin of human family. In Furuichi, T., Yamagiwa, J., & Aureli, F. (Eds.), Dispersing primate females: Life history and social strategies in male-philopatric species (pp. 255–285). Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
Zilhão, J., Angelucci, D. E., Badal-García, E., d’Errico, F., Daniel, F., Dayet, L., … & Zapata, J. (2010). Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(3), 1023–1028.Google Scholar

References

Alvergne, A., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.003Google Scholar
Arnocky, S., Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Ouellette, D., & Albert, G. (2018). Do men with more masculine voices have better immunocompetence? Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(6), 602–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.003Google Scholar
Barta, W. D., & Kiene, S. M. (2005). Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(3), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505052440Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Google Scholar
Biehle, S. N., & Mickelson, K. D. (2012). First-time parents’ expectations about the division of childcare and play. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026608Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E. (2010). Bound to interact: The divergent goals and complex interplay of attachment and sex within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360902Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., & Finkel, E. J. (2015). The magnetism that holds us together: Sexuality and relationship maintenance across relationship development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.009Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Orpaz, A. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 929–943. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.929Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Sass, O., & Granovski-Milner, C. (2016). Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 530–546. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pspi0000069Google Scholar
Bjorklund, D. F., & Shackelford, T. K. (1999). Differences in parental investment contribute to important differences between men and women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(3), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00020Google Scholar
Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., DeBruine, L. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.009Google Scholar
Burger, H. G., Dudley, E. C., Robertson, D. M., & Dennerstein, L. (2002). Hormonal changes in the menopause transition. Recent Progress in Hormone Research, 57, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1210/rp.57.1.257Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0140525X00023992Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116Google Scholar
Cantú, S. M., Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., Weisberg, Y. J., Durante, K. M., & Beal, D. J. (2014). Fertile and selectively flirty: Women’s behavior toward men changes across the ovulatory cycle. Psychological Science, 25(2), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508413Google Scholar
Cárdenas, R. A., & Harris, L. J. (2007). Do women’s preferences for symmetry change across the menstrual cycle? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.08.003Google Scholar
Chaix, R., Cao, C., & Donnelly, P. (2008). Is mate choice in humans MHC-dependent? PLoS Genetics, 4(9), https://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1000184Google Scholar
Cobey, K. D., Little, A. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2015). Hormonal effects on women’s facial masculinity preferences: The influence of pregnancy, post-partum, and hormonal contraceptive use. Biological Psychology, 104, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.002Google Scholar
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Women’s attractiveness judgments of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 47(4), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.006Google Scholar
Dixson, B. J., Blake, K. R., Denson, T. F., Gooda-Vossos, A., O’Dean, S. M., Sulikowski, D., Rantala, M. J., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). The role of mating context and fecundability in women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity and beardedness. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 93, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.007Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1012–1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024062Google Scholar
Farrelly, D. (2013). Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: Further investigations using the mate preferences towards altruistic traits scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(4), 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2013.768595Google Scholar
Farrelly, D., Clemson, P., & Guthrie, M. (2016). Are women’s mate preferences for altruism also influenced by physical attractiveness? Evolutionary Psychology, 14(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915623698Google Scholar
Feinberg, D. R. (2008). Are human faces and voices ornaments signaling common underlying cues to mate value? Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 17(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20166Google Scholar
Fessler, D. T. (2002). Reproductive immunosuppression and diet: An evolutionary perspective on pregnancy sickness and meat consumption. Current Anthropology, 43(1), 19–61. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/324128Google Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.863723Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1). 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.933Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614561683CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, J. E., Altgelt, E. E., & Meltzer, A. L. (2019). The implications of sociosexuality for marital satisfaction and dissolution. Psychological Science, 30(10), 1460–1472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619868997Google Scholar
French, J. E., & Meltzer, A. L. (2019). Maximizing tendencies in marriage: Accentuating the implications of readily observable partner characteristics for intimates’ satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(10), 1468–1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219832337Google Scholar
French, J. E., & Meltzer, A. L. (2020). The implications of changing hormonal contraceptive use after relationship formation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(4), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.04.003Google Scholar
Gadassi, R., Bar-Nahum, L. E., Newhouse, S., Anderson, R., Heiman, J. R., Rafaeli, E., & Janssen, E. (2016). Perceived partner responsiveness mediates the association between sexual and marital satisfaction: A daily diary study in newlywed couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0448-2Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Dinh, T., Grebe, N. M., Del Giudice, M., & Thompson, M. E. (2019). Psychological cycle shifts redux: Revisiting a preregistered study examining preferences for muscularity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(6), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.005Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., Simpson, J. A., & Cousins, A. J. (2007). Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.151Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337XGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00003-2Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265(1399), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0380Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 272(1576), 2023–2027. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3112Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2010). Men’s facial masculinity predicts changes in their female partners’ sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle, whereas men’s intelligence does not. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(6), 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.06.001Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90018-3Google Scholar
Garver-Apgar, C. E., Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., Miller, R. D., & Olp, J. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17(10), 830–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01789.xGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2004). Division of labor and working-class women’s well-being across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.225Google Scholar
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233Google Scholar
Grebe, N. M., Gangestad, S. W., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Thornhill, R. (2013). Women’s luteal-phase sexual proceptivity and the functions of extended sexuality. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2106–2110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613485965Google Scholar
Grossman, F. K., Pollack, W. S., & Golding, E. (1988). Fathers and children: Predicting the quality and quantity of fathering. Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.1.82Google Scholar
Henderson, J. J., & Anglin, J. M. (2003). Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(5), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00036-9Google Scholar
Hicks, L. L., McNulty, J. K., Meltzer, A. L., & Olson, M. A. (2016). Capturing the interpersonal implications of evolved preferences? Frequency of sex shapes automatic, but not explicit, partner evaluations. Psychological Science, 27(6), 836–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616638650Google Scholar
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316Google Scholar
Jern, P., Kärnä, A., Hujanen, J., Erlin, T., Gunst, A., Rautaheimo, H., … & Zietsch, B. P. (2018). A high-powered replication study finds no effect of starting or stopping hormonal contraceptive use on relationship quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.02.008Google Scholar
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., & Smith, M. J. L. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9268-yGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., Cornwell, R. E., Feinberg, D. R., … & Moore, F. R. (2005). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 272(1561), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2962Google Scholar
Jones, B. C., Vukovic, J., Little, A. C., Roberts, S. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Circum-menopausal changes in women’s preferences for sexually dimorphic shape cues in peer-aged faces. Biological Psychology, 87(3), 453–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.04.004Google Scholar
Jones, M. (1998). Sociosexuality and motivations for romantic involvement. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2212Google Scholar
Jünger, J., Kordsmeyer, T. L., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2018a). Fertile women evaluate male bodies as more attractive, regardless of masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.007Google Scholar
Jünger, J., Motta-Mena, N. V., Cardenas, R., Bailey, D., Rosenfield, K. A., Schild, C., … & Puts, D. A. (2018b). Do women’s preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle? Hormones and Behavior, 106, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.10.008Google Scholar
Kalmuss, D., Davidson, A., & Cushman, L. (1992). Parenting expectations, experiences, and adjustment to parenthood: A test of the violated expectations framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(3), 516–526. https://doi.org/10.2307/353238Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Gurven, M., Winking, J., Hooper, P. L., & Stieglitz, J. (2010). Learning, menopause, and the human adaptive complex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1204(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05528.xGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00067595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keverne, E. B. (1976). Sexual receptivity and attractiveness in the female rhesus monkey. In Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 155–200). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klimas, C., Ehlert, U., Lacker, T. J., Waldvogel, P., & Walther, A. (2019). Higher testosterone levels are associated with unfaithful behavior in men. Biological Psychology, 146, 107730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107730Google Scholar
Koehler, N., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2002). Are human female preferences for symmetrical male faces enhanced when conception is likely? Animal Behaviour, 64(2), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3063Google Scholar
Kościński, K. (2011). Life history of female preferences for male faces. Human Nature, 22(4), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-011-9123-7Google Scholar
Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L., & Levine, J. A. (1985). Paternal behavior in humans. American Zoologist, 25(3), 883–894. www.jstor.org/stable/3883043Google Scholar
Li, N. P. (2007). Mate preference necessities in long- and short-term mating: People prioritize in themselves what their mates prioritize in them. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 528. http://library.allanschore.com/docs/Li2007.pdfGoogle Scholar
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947Google Scholar
Lie, H. C., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2008). Genetic diversity revealed in human faces. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 62(10), 2473–2486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00478.xGoogle Scholar
Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Petrie, M., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2013). Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(9), 1777–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.014Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.003Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Feinberg, D. R. (2008). Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: Interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality. Behavioral Ecology, 19(4), 902–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn049Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Saxton, T. K., Roberts, S. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Vukovic, J., … & Chenore, T. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(6), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006Google Scholar
Manning, C. J., Wakeland, E. K., & Potts, W. K. (1992). Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature, 360(6404), 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/360581a0Google Scholar
Marcinkowska, U. M., Hahn, A. C., Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2019). No evidence that women using oral contraceptives have weaker preferences for masculine characteristics in men’s faces. PLoS One, 14(1), e0210162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210162Google Scholar
Marcinkowska, U. M., Jasienska, G., & Prokop, P. (2018). A comparison of masculinity facial preference among naturally cycling, pregnant, lactating, and post-menopausal women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(5), 1367–1374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1093-3Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L. (2017). Wives with masculine husbands report increased marital satisfaction near peak fertility. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000083Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., Makhanova, A., Hicks, L. L., French, J. E., McNulty, J. K., & Bradbury, T. N. (2017). Quantifying the sexual afterglow: The lingering benefits of sex and their implications for pair-bonded relationships. Psychological Science, 28(5), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617691361Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., & McNulty, J. K. (2014) “Tell me I’m sexy… and otherwise valuable”: Body valuation and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 21(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12018Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., Jackson, G. L., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034424Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., & Maner, J. K. (2015). Women like being valued for sex, as long as it is by a committed partner. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0622-1Google Scholar
Menkin, J. A., Robles, T. F., Wiley, J. F., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2015). Online dating across the life span: Users’ relationship goals. Psychology and Aging, 30(4), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039722Google Scholar
Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: A review. The American Naturalist, 149(5), 916–932. https://doi.org/10.1086/286030Google Scholar
Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muise, A., Schimmack, U., & Impett, E. A. (2016). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(4), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616462Google Scholar
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1155Google Scholar
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2003). The dynamic structure of relationship perceptions: Differential importance as a strategy of relationship maintenance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1433–1446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256376Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. J., Re, D. E., & Feinberg, D. R. (2011). Voice pitch influences perceptions of sexual infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900109Google Scholar
Ostovich, J. M., & Sabini, J. (2004). How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264754Google Scholar
Owens, R., Driscoll, H., & Farrelly, D. (2020). Variation in women’s mate preferences over the development of a monogamous relationship corresponds with changes in men’s life history strategy. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00246-wGoogle Scholar
Paget, W., & Timæus, I. (1994). A relational Gompertz model of male fertility: Development and assessment. Population Studies 48(2), 333–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000147826Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/21557Google Scholar
Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Women’s sexual strategies: The evolution of long-term bonds and extrapair sex. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2006.10559837Google Scholar
Pinkhasov, R. M., Shteynshlyuger, A., Hakimian, P., Lindsay, G. K., Samadi, D. B., & Shabsigh, R. (2010). Are men shortchanged on health? Perspective on life expectancy, morbidity, and mortality in men and women in the United States. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 64(4), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02289.xGoogle Scholar
Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.xGoogle Scholar
Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.001Google Scholar
Re, D. E., Tskhay, K. O., Tong, M.-O., Wilson, J. P., Zhong, C.-B., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Facing fate: Estimates of longevity from facial appearance and their underlying cues. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 3(1), 30–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/arc0000015Google Scholar
Roberts, S. C., Gosling, L. M., Carter, V., & Petrie, M. (2008). MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 275(1652), 2715–2722. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0825Google Scholar
Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Cobey, K. D., Klapilová, K., Havlíček, J., … & Petrie, M. (2014). Partner choice, relationship satisfaction, and oral contraception: The congruency hypothesis. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1497–1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614532295Google Scholar
Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859Google Scholar
Russell, V. M., McNulty, J. K., Baker, L. R., & Meltzer, A. L. (2014). The association between discontinuing hormonal contraceptives and wives’ marital satisfaction depends on husbands’ facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(48), 17081–17086. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414784111Google Scholar
Schaller, M. (2011). The behavioral immune system and the psychology of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1583), 3418–3426. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0029Google Scholar
Seal, D. W., Agostinelli, G., & Hannett, C. A. (1994). Extradyadic romantic involvement: Moderating effects of sociosexuality and gender. Sex Roles, 31(1–2), 1–22. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF01560274Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 456–466. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.456Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminate validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.6.870Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., Christensen, P. N., & Leck, K. (1999). Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 159–172. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.159Google Scholar
Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M. S. (1987). Bereavement and health: The psychological and physical consequences of partner loss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., Chapman, J. F., & Gangestad, S. W. (2013). Women’s preferences for men’s scents associated with testosterone and cortisol levels: Patterns across the ovulatory cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.01.003Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5(5), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00629.xGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(3), 175–201. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00005-7Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R., Scheyd, G., McCollough, J. K., & Franklin, M. (2003). Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14(5), 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arg043Google Scholar
Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Meltzer, A. L., & Tsai, M. H. (2020). Mate preferences for warmth-trustworthiness predict romantic attraction in the early stages of mate selection and satisfaction in ongoing relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219855048Google Scholar
van Stein, K. R., Strauß, B., & Brenk-Franz, K. (2019). Ovulatory shifts in sexual desire but not mate preferences: An LH-test-confirmed, longitudinal study. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1474704919848116Google Scholar
Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Bettens, F., & Paepke, A. J. (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 260(1359), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0087Google Scholar
Wood, W., Kressel, L., Joshi, P. D., & Louie, B. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women’s mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1754073914523073Google Scholar

References

Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J., et al. (134 more authors). (2011). Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471(7339). E1–E4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09831Google Scholar
Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2011). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq092Google Scholar
Ackerman, J. M., Griskevicius, V., & Li, N. P. (2011). Let’s get serious: Communicating commitment in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022412Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1973). Attachment as related to mother-infant interaction. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 9, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60032-7Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41(1), 49–67. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1127388Google Scholar
Anderson, S. (2007). The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.4.151Google Scholar
Archer, J. (1997). Why do people love their pets? Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(4), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0162-3095(99)80001-4Google Scholar
Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(1), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00838.2004Google Scholar
Bahr, R. (2019). Critic’s notebook: Baby Yoda, “The Dark Crystal” and the need for puppetry in the age of CGI. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/baby-yoda-dark-crystal-prove-we-still-need-puppetry-age-cgi-1265008Google Scholar
Bailey, J. M. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1081–1093. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1081Google Scholar
Balsam, K. F., Beauchaine, T. P., Rothblum, E. D., & Solomon, S. E. (2008). Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.102Google Scholar
Bell, R. R. (1963). Marriage and family interaction. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (1997). Attachment, mating, and parenting: An evolutionary interpretation. Human Nature, 8(4), 361–381.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., & Cassidy, J. (1994). Attachment: Theory and evidence. In Rutter, M. & Hay, D. (Eds.), Development through life: A handbook for clinicians (pp. 373–402). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62(4), 647–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01558.xGoogle Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. (2011). Principles of social evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231157.001.0001Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39(5), 350–371. PMID:13610508Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Loss. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. (2008). Evolutionary economics of mental time travel? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.003Google Scholar
Brinig, M. F. (1990). Rings and promises. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 6(1), 203–215.Google Scholar
Broad, K. D., Curley, J. P., & Keverne, E. B. (2006). Mother-infant bonding and the evolution of mammalian social relationships. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1476). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1940Google Scholar
Bronte-Tinkew, J., Ryan, S., Carrano, J., & Moore, K. A. (2007). Resident fathers’ pregnancy intentions, prenatal behaviors, and links to involvement with infants. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00425.xGoogle Scholar
Buckle, L., Gallup, G. G. Jr., & Rodd, Z. A. (1996). Marriage as a reproductive contract: Patterns of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(6), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0162-3095(96)00075–1Google Scholar
Burch, R. L. (2019). The wedding as a reproductive ritual. Review of General Psychology, 23(3), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268019832848Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1988). Love acts: The evolutionary biology of love. In Sternberg, R. J. & Barnes, M. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 100–118). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Buss, D. (2007). The evolution of human mating. Acta Psychologia Sinica, 39(3), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617698225Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2019). The evolution of love in humans. In Sternberg, R. J. & Sternberg, K. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 42–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Haselton, M. (2005). The evolution of jealousy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 506–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.006Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., & Westen, D. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy: Not gone, not forgotten, and not explained well by alternative hypotheses. Psychological Science, 7(6), 373–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00392.xGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.xGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., Choe, J. C., Lim, H. K., Hasegawa, , … & Bennett, K. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypothesis about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6(1), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00215.xGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204Google Scholar
Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94(suppl), 180–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/228946Google Scholar
Campbell, L., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Commitment, love, and mate retention. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The evolutionary psychology handbook (pp. 419–442). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Camperio Ciani, A., Battaglia, U., Cesare, L., Camperio Ciani, G., & Capiluppi, C. (2018). Possible balancing selection in human female homosexuality. Human Nature, 29(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-017-9309-8Google Scholar
Cox, A., & Fisher, M. (2009). The Texas billionaire’s pregnant bride: An evolutionary interpretation of romance fiction titles. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3(4), 386–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0099308Google Scholar
Daly, M. I., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorn, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Wall, F. (2019). Mama’s last hug: Animal emotions and what they tell us about ourselves. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Del Corral, M. (2015). Why do people keep their promises? An overview of strategic commitment. Cuadernos de Economía, 34(65), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v34n65.40511Google Scholar
Driscoll, C. A., Macdonald, D. W., & O’Brien, S. J. (2009). From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(1), 9971–9978. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901586106Google Scholar
Duffy, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (2010). Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v12n02_01Google Scholar
Durante, K. M., & Li, N. P. (2009). Oestradiol level and opportunistic mating in women. Biology Letters, 5, 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0709Google Scholar
Easton, J. A., Goetz, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2015). Human mate choice, evolution of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., 11, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.81049-1Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & Niesta, D. (2008). Romantic red: Red enhances men’s attraction to women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1150–1164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1150Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (1989). Evolution of human serial pairbonding. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 78(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330780303Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (1992). Anatomy of love: The natural history of monogamy, adultery, and divorce. New York, NY: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (2011). Serial monogamy and clandestine adultery: Evolution and consequences of the dual human reproductive strategy. In Roberts, S. C. (Ed.), Applied evolutionary psychology (pp. 96–111). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2006). Romantic love: A mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2173–2186. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1938Google Scholar
Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2010). Man change thyself: Hero versus heroine development in Harlequin romance novels. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4(4), 305–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0099281Google Scholar
Francis-Tan, A., & Mialon, H. M. (2015). “A diamond is forever” and other fairy tales: The relationship between wedding expenses and marriage duration. Economic Inquiry, 53(4), 1919–1930. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12206Google Scholar
Gallup, Inc. (2018). In U.S., estimate of LGBT population rises to 4.5%. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/234863/estimate-lgbt-population-rises.aspxGoogle Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.55Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2005). Evolution of paternal investment. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The evolutionary psychology handbook (pp. 483–505). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A. S. (2013). Kin selection. In Maloy, S. & Hughes, K. (Eds.), Brenner’s encyclopedia of genetics (pp. 160–162). London: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374984-0.09001-XGoogle Scholar
Guitar, A. E., Geher, G. G., Kruger, D. J., Garcia, J. R., Fisher, M. L., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2017). Defining and distinguishing sexual and emotional infidelity. Current Psychology, 36(3), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9432-4Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetic evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4Google Scholar
Harrison, M. A., Becker, M. A., & Janze, M. F. (2014). “Heck with the flowers and candy – I just want sex!” Women’s and men’s agreement and disagreement about romance. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8(3), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099846Google Scholar
Harrison, M. A., & Shortall, J. C. (2011). Women and men in love: Who really feels it and says it first? The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(6), 727–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.522626Google Scholar
Harrison, M. A., Shortall, J. C., Dispenza, F. D., & Gallup, Jr., G. G. (2011). You must have been a beautiful baby: Ratings of infant facial attractiveness fail to predict ratings of adult attractiveness. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(4), 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.06.003Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Williams, J. (2017). Childhood attachment to pets: Associations between pet attachment, attitudes to animals, compassion, and humane behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 490. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050490Google Scholar
Hecht, A. (2020). Here’s how much Americans plan to spend on Valentine’s Day gifts. Retrieved from www.cnbc.com/2020/02/13/how-much-americans-plan-to-spend-on-valentines-day.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, K., & Fitzgerald, H. (1983). The infant’s physical attractiveness: Its effect on bonding and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0355(198321)4:1%3C1::AID-IMHJ2280040102%3E3.0.CO;2-2Google Scholar
Hong, Y. R., & Sun Park, J. (2012). Impact of attachment, temperament and parenting on human development. Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 55(12), 449–454. https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2012.55.12.449Google Scholar
Howard, R. M., & Perilloux, C. (2016). Is mating psychology most closely tied to biological sex or preferred partner’s sex? Personality and Individual Differences, 115(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.009Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2008). Cooperative breeding and the paradox of facultative fathering. In Neurobiology of the parental brain (pp. 405–416). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, S. M. (2019). Engagement rings as a commitment cue. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3656-1Google Scholar
Hughes, S. M., & Aung, T. (2017). Modern day female preferences for resources and provisioning by long-term mates. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(3), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000084Google Scholar
Hurlbert, D. F. (2008). Female sexuality: A comparative study between women in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 19(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239308404375Google Scholar
Jensen, J. F., Rauer, A. J., & Volling, B. (2013). A dyadic view of support in marriage: The critical role of men’s support provision. Sex Roles, 68(7–8), 427–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0256-xGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L., Petty, C. S., & Neaves, W. B. (1980). A comparative study of daily sperm production and testicular composition in humans and rats. Biology of Reproduction, 22(5), 1233–1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolreprod/22.5.1233Google Scholar
Julius, H., Beetz, A., Kotrschal, K., Turner, D., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2013). Attachment to pets: An integrative view of human-animal relationships with implications for therapeutic practice. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, S. (2002). Bowling with our imaginary friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00098-8Google Scholar
Karen, R. (1994). Becoming attached: First relationships and how they shape our capacity to love. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G., & Goldscheider, F. (2007). Do men “need” a spouse more than women? Perceptions of the importance of marriage for men and women. Sociology Quarterly, 48(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00069.xGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T. (2006). A dynamical evolutionary view of love. In Sternberg, R. J. & Weis, K. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 15–34). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2011). Transnational relations between perceived parental acceptance and personality dispositions of children and adults: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418986Google Scholar
Kuhle, B. X. (2011). Did you have sex with him? Do you love her? An in vivo test of sex differences in jealous interrogations. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 1044–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.034Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., McCabe, K., Smith, V. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2001). Incremental commitment and reciprocity in a real-time public goods game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1662–1673. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012712009Google Scholar
Lobmaier, J., Sprengelmeyer, R., Wiffen, B., & Perrett, D. (2010). Female and male responses to cuteness, age, and emotion in infant faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.05.004Google Scholar
Markovic, N., & Markovic, O. (2008). The female reproductive system in health and disease. In Markovic, N. & Markovic, O. (Eds.), What every woman should know about cervical cancer (pp. 1–22). Rockville, MD: Springer Science. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6937-6_1Google Scholar
Meehan, M., Massavelli, B., & Pachana, N. (2017). Using attachment theory and social support theory to examine and measure pets as sources of social support and attachment figures. Anthrozoös, 30(2), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1311050Google Scholar
Neese, R. M. (1990). Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nature, 1(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02733986Google Scholar
Owen Blakemore, J. E., Lawton, C. A., & Vartanian, L. R. (2005). I can’t wait to get married: Gender differences in drive to marry. Sex Roles, 53(5–6), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-6756-1Google Scholar
Pachankis, J. E., & Bränström, R. (2019). How many sexual minorities are hidden? Projecting the size of the global closet with implications for policy and public health. PLoS One, 14(6), e0218084. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218084Google Scholar
Payne, E., Bennett, P. C., & McGreevy, P. D. (2015). Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog-human dyad. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 8, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S74972Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2020). The global divide on homosexuality exists. Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org/global/2020/06/25/global-divide-on-homosexuality-persists/Google Scholar
Price, M. E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2002). Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00093-9Google Scholar
Rice, W. R., Friberg, U., & Gavrilets, S. (2012). Homosexuality as a consequence of epigenetically canalized sexual development. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87(4), 343–368. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668167Google Scholar
Rohner, R. P., & Veneziano, R. A. (2001). The importance of father love: History and contemporary evidence. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.382Google Scholar
Savin-Williams, R. (2014). An exploratory study of the categorical versus spectrum nature of sexual orientation. Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 446–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.871691Google Scholar
Schacht, R., & Kramer, K. L. (2019). Are we monogamous? A review of the evolution of pair-bonding in humans and its contemporary variation cross-culturally. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7(230). https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00230Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S., Spires, E., & Young, R. (2019). Why do people keep their promises? A further investigation. Experimental Economics, 22, 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-018-9567-2Google Scholar
Silk, J. B. (2013). Reciprocal altruism. Current Biology, 23(18), R827–R828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.052Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2008). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework: Theory, research, and clinical applications. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 2nd ed. (pp. 131–157). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Pedersen, E. J., Forster, D. E., McCullough, M. E., & Lieberman, D. (2017). Cooperation: The roles of interpersonal value and gratitude. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(6), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.08.003Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Love stories. Personal Relationships, 3(1), 1359–1379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1996.tb00104.xGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Love is a story. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sui, J. J., & Baloglu, S. (2003). The role of emotional commitment in relationship marketing: An empirical investigation of a loyalty model for casinos. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 27(4), 470–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480030274006Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarabulsy, G. M., Tessier, R., Gagnon, J., & Piché, C. (1996). Attachment classification and infant responsiveness during interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 19(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90051-XGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. (2019). Valentine’s Day: Southeast Asians are spending more. Retrieved from https://theaseanpost.com/article/valentines-day-southeast-asians-are-spending-moreGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. H. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
VanderLaan, D. P., & Vasey, P. L. (2008). Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9139-yGoogle Scholar
Wade, T. J., Auer, G., & Roth, T. M. (2009). What is love: Further investigation of love acts. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3(4), 290–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0099315Google Scholar
Wilkins, R., & Gareis, E. (2006). Emotion expression and the locution “‘I love you”: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(1), 51–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.003Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. I., & Daly, M. (1996). Male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(1), 2–7. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/20182377Google Scholar
Xu, X., Aron, A., Brown, L., Cao, G., Feng, T., & Weng, X. (2011). Reward and motivation systems: A brain mapping study of early-stage intense romantic love in Chinese participants. Human Brain Mapping, 32(2), 249–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21017.Google Scholar
Young, M. A. (1985). The evolution of domestic pets and companion animals. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 15(2), 297–309. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(85)50302-2Google Scholar

References

Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2019). The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biological Reviews, 94(4), 1381–1415.Google Scholar
Arístegui, I., Solano, A. C., & Buunk, A. P. (2019). Do transgender people respond according to their biological sex or their gender identity when confronted with romantic rivals? Evolutionary Psychology, 17(2), 1474704919851139.Google Scholar
Attridge, M. (2013). Jealousy and relationship closeness: Exploring the good (reactive) and bad (suspicious) sides of romantic jealousy. SAGE open, 3(1), 2158244013476054.Google Scholar
Aylor, B., & Dainton, M. (2001). Antecedents in romantic jealousy experience, expression, and goals. Western Journal of Communication, 65(4), 370–391.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., & Gladue, B. A. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1081.Google Scholar
Barelds, D. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2006). Reactive, anxious and possessive forms of jealousy and their relation to relationship quality among heterosexuals and homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(3), 183–198.Google Scholar
Bendixen, M., Kennair, L. E. O., & Buss, D. M. (2015). Jealousy: Evidence of strong sex differences using both forced choice and continuous measure paradigms. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 212–216.Google Scholar
Berman, M. I., & Frazier, P. A. (2005). Relationship power and betrayal experience as predictors of reactions to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1617–1627.Google Scholar
Bhugra, D. (1993). Cross-cultural aspects of jealousy. International Review of Psychiatry, 5(2–3), 271–280.Google Scholar
Bishay, N. R., Petersen, N., & Tarrier, N. (1989). An uncontrolled study of cognitive therapy for morbid jealousy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 386–389.Google Scholar
Boothroyd, L. G., & Vukovic, J. (2018). Mate preferences across the lifespan. In Welling, L. L. M. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on evolutionary psychology and behavioral endocrinology (pp. 143–159). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, J. B. (1991). Modes of response to jealousy-evoking situations. In Salovey, P. (Ed.), The psychology of jealousy and envy (pp. 178–207). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. (2005). Evolutionary psychology: The emperor’s new paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 277–283.Google Scholar
Burbank, V. K. (1987). Female aggression in cross-cultural perspective. Behavior Science Research, 21(1–4), 70–100.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as essential as love and sex. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(4), 23–29.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2014). Comment: Evolutionary criteria for considering an emotion “basic”: Jealousy as an illustration. Emotion Review, 6(4), 313–315.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 155–160.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Choe, J. A. E., Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2000). Distress about mating rivals. Personal Relationships, 7(3), 235–243.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., Choe, J. C., Lim, H. K., Hasegawa, M., … & Bennett, K. (1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6(1), 125–150.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., & McKibbin, W. F. (2008). The mate retention inventory-short form (MRI-SF). Personality and Individual Differences, 44(1), 322–334.Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P. (1995). Sex, self-esteem, dependency and extradyadic sexual experience as related to jealousy responses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(1), 147–153.Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P. (1997). Personality, birth order and attachment styles as related to various types of jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 997–1006.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Castro Solano, A., Zurriaga, R., & González, P. (2011). Gender differences in the jealousy-evoking effect of rival characteristics: A study in Spain and Argentina. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(3), 323–339.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2015). Rival characteristics that provoke jealousy: A study in Iraqi Kurdistan. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(2), 116.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Fernandez, A. M. (2020). Don’t cheat like I did: Possessive jealousy and infidelity in close relationships. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 14(2), 211–216.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Massar, K. (2019). Intimate partner violence in Nicaragua: The role of possessive jealousy, intrasexual competitiveness, life history, mate value, and stress. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15–16), NP8101-NP8123.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Massar, K., Dijkstra, P. D., & Fernández, A. M. (2019). Intersexual and intrasexual competition and their relation to jealousy. In Welling, L. L. M. and Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on evolutionary psychology and behavioral endocrinology (pp. 125–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Park, J. H., Zurriaga, R., Klavina, L., & Massar, K. (2008). Height predicts jealousy differently for men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 133–139.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: Causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16–26.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Commitment, love, and mate retention. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 419–442). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Canetto, S. S., & Lester, D. (2002). Love and achievement motives in women’s and men’s suicide notes. The Journal of Psychology, 136(5), 573–576.Google Scholar
Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Meta-analyses of sex differences in responses to sexual versus emotional infidelity: Men and women are more similar than different. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414537Google Scholar
Chung, M., & Harris, C. R. (2018). Jealousy as a specific emotion: The dynamic functional model. Emotion Review, 10(4), 272–287.Google Scholar
Cobey, K. D., Buunk, A. P., Roberts, S. C., Klipping, C., Appels, N., Zimmerman, Y., … & Pollet, T. V. (2012). Reported jealousy differs as a function of menstrual cycle stage and contraceptive pill use: A within-subjects investigation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 395–401.Google Scholar
Cobey, K. D., Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. C., & Buunk, A. P. (2011). Hormonal birth control use and relationship jealousy: Evidence for estrogen dosage effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 315–317.Google Scholar
Costa, A. L., Sophia, E. C., Sanches, C., Tavares, H., & Zilberman, M. L. (2015). Pathological jealousy: Romantic relationship characteristics, emotional and personality aspects, and social adjustment. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 38–44.Google Scholar
Costa, N., Gomes, H., Almeida, T., Pinheiro, R. S., Almeida, C., Gondim, L., … & Lima, V. (2016). Violence against women: Can “jealousy” mitigate the significance of violence? Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 33(3), 525–533.Google Scholar
Cross, C. P., & Campbell, A. (2011). Women’s aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(5), 390–398.Google Scholar
Croston, R., Branch, C. L., Kozlovsky, D. Y., Dukas, R., & Pravosudov, V. V. (2015). Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits. Behavioral Ecology, 26(6), 1447–1459.Google Scholar
Cubicciotti, D. D., & Mason, W. A. (1978). Comparative studies of social behavior in Callicebus and Saimiri: Heterosexual jealousy behavior. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 3(3), 311–322.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (Vol. 1), 1st ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
DeLecce, T., & Pham, M. N. (2021). Sperm competition theory. In Shackleford, T. K. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of evolutionary psychology: Foundations of evolutionary psychology (pp. 222–240). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
de Menezes Gomes, R., de Araújo Lopes, F., & Castro, F. N. (2021). Influence of sexual genotype and gender self-perception on sociosexuality and self-esteem among transgender people. Human Nature, 31(4), 483–496.Google Scholar
de Souza, A. A. L., Verderane, M. P., Taira, J. T., & Otta, E. (2006). Emotional and sexual jealousy as a function of sex and sexual orientation in a Brazilian sample. Psychological Reports, 98(2), 529–535.Google Scholar
De Visser, R., & McDonald, D. (2007). Swings and roundabouts: Management of jealousy in heterosexual “swinging” couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 459–476.Google Scholar
DeSteno, D. A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy? Questioning the “fitness” of the model. Psychological Science, 7(6), 367–372.Google Scholar
DeSteno, D., Valdesolo, P., & Bartlett, M. Y. (2006). Jealousy and the threatened self: Getting to the heart of the green-eyed monster. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 626.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, P., Barelds, D. P., & Groothof, H. A. (2013). Jealousy in response to online and offline infidelity: The role of sex and sexual orientation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 328–336.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (1998). Jealousy as a function of rival characteristics: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(11), 1158–1166.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (2002). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking effect of rival characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(6), 829–852.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, P., Groothof, H. A., Poel, G. A., Laverman, E. T., Schrier, M., & Buunk, B. P. (2001). Sex differences in the events that elicit jealousy among homosexuals. Personal Relationships, 8(1), 41–54.Google Scholar
Dolan, M., & Bishay, N. (1996). The effectiveness of cognitive therapy in the treatment of non-psychotic morbid jealousy. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 588–593.Google Scholar
Edlund, J. E., Buller, D. J., Sagarin, B. J., Heider, J. D., Scherer, C. R., Farc, M. M., & Ojedokun, O. (2019). Male sexual jealousy: Lost paternity opportunities? Psychological Reports, 122(2), 575–592.Google Scholar
Edlund, J. E., Heider, J. D., Scherer, C. R., Farc, M. M., & Sagarin, B. J. (2006). Sex differences in jealousy in response to actual infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 4(1), 147470490600400137.Google Scholar
Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2017). Sex differences in jealousy: A 25-year retrospective. In Olson, J. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 55, pp. 259–302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ein-Dor, T., Perry-Paldi, A., Hirschberger, G., Birnbaum, G. E., & Deutsch, D. (2015). Coping with mate poaching: Gender differences in detection of infidelity related threats. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(1), 17–24.Google Scholar
Fernandez, A. M. (2017). Sexual jealousy among women. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1425-1Google Scholar
Fernandez, A. M., Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., & Dufey, M. (2014). BMI, age, mate value, and intrasexual competition in Chilean women. Current Psychology, 33, 435–450.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. (Ed.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of women and competition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. L., & Candea, C. (2012). You ain’t woman enough to take my man: Female intrasexual competition as portrayed in songs. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(4), 480.Google Scholar
Frederick, D. A., & Fales, M. R. (2016). Upset over sexual versus emotional infidelity among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 175–191.Google Scholar
Galperin, A., & Haselton, M. (2010). Predictors of how often and when people fall in love. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C., DeSoto, M. C., Hoard, M. K., Sheldon, M. S., & Cooper, M. L. (2001). Estrogens and relationship jealousy. Human Nature, 12(4), 299–320.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A., & Mace, R. (2007). Polygyny, reproductive success and child health in rural Ethiopia: Why marry a married man? Journal of Biosocial Science, 39(2), 287.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–1259.Google Scholar
Gulassa, D. C. R., Costa, A. L. D., Sophia, E. C., Sanches, C. C., Vendrame, T., & Zilberman, M. L. (2011). Group therapy for morbid jealousy. Revista de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul, 33(2), 128–129.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. (2002). Sexual and romantic jealousy in heterosexual and homosexual adults. Psychological Science, 13(1), 7–12.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. (2003). A review of sex differences in sexual jealousy, including self-report data, psychophysiological responses, interpersonal violence, and morbid jealousy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(2), 102–128.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. A., & Shortall, J. C. (2011). Women and men in love: Who really feels it and says it first? The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(6), 727–736.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 47–66.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hupka, R. B. (1981). Cultural determinants of jealousy. Alternative Lifestyles, 4(3), 310–356.Google Scholar
Hupka, R. B., Zaleski, Z., Otto, J., Reidl, L., & Tarabrina, N. V. (1997). The colors of anger, envy, fear, and jealousy: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 28(2), 156–171.Google Scholar
Jalnapurkar, I., Allen, M., & Pigott, T. (2018). Sex differences in anxiety disorders: A review. Journal of Psychiatry, Depression & Anxiety, 4(12), 3–16.Google Scholar
Janicke, T., Häderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, I. M. J., & Anthes, N. (2016). Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Science Advances, 2(2), e1500983.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, W., Sudakov, M., & Wilreker, B. C. (2005). Co-wife conflict and co-operation. Ethnology, 44(1), 81–98.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D., Blumstein, D. T., Fowler, J. H., & Haselton, M. G. (2013). The evolution of error: Error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(8), 474–481.Google Scholar
Katz, J., & van der Kloet, E. (2010). The first man in her life: Father emotional responsiveness during adolescence and college women’s sexual refusal behaviors. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 38(4), 344–356.Google Scholar
Khanchandani, L., & Durham, T. W. (2009). Jealousy during dating among female college students. College Student Journal, 43(4), 1272–1279.Google Scholar
Kingham, M., & Gordon, H. (2004). Aspects of morbid jealousy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10(3), 207–215.Google Scholar
Kuhle, B. X. (2011). Did you have sex with him? Do you love her? An in vivo test of sex differences in jealous interrogations. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 1044–1047.Google Scholar
Lazarus, J., Inglis, I., & Torrance, R. R. (2004). Mate guarding conflict, extra-pair courtship and signaling in the Harlequin Duck, Histrionicus histrionicus. Behaviour, 141, 1061–1078.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M., Al-Shawaf, L., Janiak, M. C., & Akunebu, S. P. (2018). Integrating molecular genetics and evolutionary psychology: Sexual jealousy and the androgen receptor (AR) gene. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 276–282.Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Connely, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2011). Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 862–868.Google Scholar
López, F. J. C. (2003). Jealousy: A case of application of functional analytic psychotherapy. Psychology in Spain, 7(1), 86–98.Google Scholar
Luo, J., Wang, L. G., & Gao, W. B. (2012). The influence of the absence of fathers and the timing of separation on anxiety and self-esteem of adolescents: A cross-sectional survey. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(5), 723–731.Google Scholar
Madhavan, S. (2002). Best of friends and worst of enemies: Competition and collaboration in polygyny. Ethnology, 41(1), 69–84.Google Scholar
Mafra, A. L., Varella, M. A. C., Defelipe, R. P., Anchieta, N. M., de Almeida, C. A. G., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Makeup usage in women as a tactic to attract mates and compete with rivals. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110042.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Coyle, J. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2014). Confronting intrasexual rivals: 2D: 4D digit ratio predicts behavioral and endocrinological responses to infidelity threat. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(1), 119–128.Google Scholar
Maninger, N., Mendoza, S. P., Williams, D. R., Mason, W. A., Cherry, S. R., Rowland, D. J., … & Bales, K. L. (2017). Imaging, behavior and endocrine analysis of “jealousy” in a monogamous primate. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 119.Google Scholar
Marazziti, D., Di Nasso, E., Masala, I., Baroni, S., Abelli, M., Mengali, F., … & Rucci, P. (2003). Normal and obsessional jealousy: A study of a population of young adults. European Psychiatry, 18(3), 106–111.Google Scholar
Marazziti, D., Sbrana, A., Rucci, P., Cherici, L., Mungai, F., Gonnelli, C., … & Osso, M. C. D. (2010). Heterogeneity of the jealousy phenomenon in the general population: An Italian study. CNS Spectrums, 15(1), 19–24.Google Scholar
Martínez-León, N. C., Peña, J. J., Salazar, H., García, A., & Sierra, J. C. (2017). A systematic review of romantic jealousy in relationships. Terapia Psicológica. 35(2), 203–212.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster (2020, January 30). Jealous vs envious. Retrieved from www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/jealous-vs-enviousGoogle Scholar
Mileva, V. R., Jones, A. L., Russell, R., & Little, A. C. (2016). Sex differences in the perceived dominance and prestige of women with and without cosmetics. Perception, 45(10), 1166–1183.Google Scholar
Mogilski, J. K., Reeve, S. D., Nicolas, S. C., Donaldson, S. H., Mitchell, V. E., & Welling, L. L. (2019). Jealousy, consent, and compersion within monogamous and consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1811–1828.Google Scholar
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., … & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. P., McCurdy, K., Jehl, B., Rowan, M., & Larrimore, K. (2020). Jealousy behaviors in early childhood: Associations with attachment and temperament. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(3), 266–272.Google Scholar
Muscanell, N. L., Guadagno, R. E., Rice, L., & Murphy, S. (2013). Don’t it make my brown eyes green? An analysis of Facebook use and romantic jealousy. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4), 237–242.Google Scholar
Panksepp, J. (2010). The evolutionary sources of jealousy: Cross-species approaches to fundamental issues. In Hart, S. L. & Legerstee, M. (Eds.), Handbook of jealousy: Theory, research, and multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 101–120). New York, NY: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. W. (2007). The close relationships of lesbians and gay men. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 405–424.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, S. M., & Wong, P. T. (1989). Multidimensional jealousy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6(2), 181–196.Google Scholar
Pollet, T. V., & Saxton, T. K. (2020). Jealousy as a function of rival characteristics: Two large replication studies and meta-analyses support gender differences in reactions to rival attractiveness but not dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(10), 1428–1443.Google Scholar
Puente, S., & Cohen, D. (2003). Jealousy and the meaning (or nonmeaning) of violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 449–460.Google Scholar
Redlick, M. (2016). The green-eyed monster: Mate value, relational uncertainty, and jealousy in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 23(3), 505–516.Google Scholar
Rilling, J. K., Winslow, J. T., & Kilts, C. D. (2004). The neural correlates of mate competition in dominant male rhesus macaques. Biological Psychiatry, 56(5), 364–375.Google Scholar
Sagarin, B. J., Martin, A. L., Coutinho, S. A., Edlund, J. E., Patel, L., Skowronski, J. J., & Zengel, B. (2012). Sex differences in jealousy: A meta-analytic examination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(6), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.02.006Google Scholar
Samad, F. D., Sidi, H., Kumar, J., Das, S., Midin, M., & Hatta, N. H. (2019). Subduing the green-eyed monster: Bridging the psychopharmacological and psychosocial treatment perspective in understanding pathological jealousy. Current Drug Targets, 20(2), 201–209.Google Scholar
Scelza, B. A. (2014). Jealousy in a small-scale, natural fertility population: The roles of paternity, investment and love in jealous response. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(2), 103–108.Google Scholar
Scelza, B. A., Prall, S. P., Blumenfield, T., Crittenden, A. N., Gurven, M., Kline, M., … & McElreath, R. (2020). Patterns of paternal investment predict cross-cultural variation in jealous response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
Scherer, C. R., Akers, E. G., & Kolbe, K. L. (2013). Bisexuals and the sex differences in jealousy hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(8), 1064–1071.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & Pilcher, J. J. (2004). Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: How do we know one when we see one? Psychological Science, 15(10), 643–649.Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., LeBlanc, G. J., & Drass, E. (2000). Emotional reactions to infidelity. Cognition & Emotion, 14(5), 643–659.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., Voracek, M., Schmitt, D. P., Buss, D. M., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., & Michalski, R. L. (2004). Romantic jealousy in early adulthood and in later life. Human Nature, 15(3), 283–300.Google Scholar
Sheets, V., Fredendall, L., & Claypool, H. (1997). Jealousy evocation, partner reassurance, and relationship stability: An exploration of the potential benefits of jealousy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 387–402.Google Scholar
Sheets, V. L., & Wolfe, M. D. (2001). Sexual jealousy in heterosexuals, lesbians, and gays. Sex Roles, 44(5), 255–276.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 487–510.Google Scholar
Southard, A., & Abel, M. C. (2010). Sex differences in romantic jealousy: Evaluating past and present relationship experience. American Journal of Psychological Research, 6(1), 41–49.Google Scholar
Starkweather, K. E., & Hames, R. (2012). A survey of non-classical polyandry. Human Nature, 23(2), 149–172.Google Scholar
Štěrbová, Z., Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Tureček, P., Varella, M. A. C., & Valentova, J. V. (2018). Father’s physique influences mate preferences but not the actual choice of male somatotype in heterosexual women and homosexual men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 130–138.Google Scholar
Štěrbová, Z., & Valentova, J. (2012). Influence of homogamy, complementarity, and sexual imprinting on mate choice. Anthropologie, 50(1), 47–60.Google Scholar
Stravogiannis, A. L. de C., Gebara, C. M., Kim, H. S., Monicci, F. U., Sanches, C., & Tavares, H. (in press). Group cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of pathological jealousy: A pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Stravogiannis, A. L. de C., Kim, H. S., Sophia, E. C., Sanches, C., Zilberman, M. L., & Tavares, H. (2018). Pathological jealousy and pathological love: Apples to apples or apples to oranges? Psychiatry Research, 259, 562–570.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). Time evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, H., Matsuura, M., Yahata, N., Koeda, M., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2006). Men and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity. NeuroImage, 32(3), 1299–1307.Google Scholar
Tarrier, N., Beckett, R., Harwood, S., & Bishay, N. (1990). Morbid jealousy: A review and cognitive-behavioural formulation. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 157(3), 319–326.Google Scholar
Valentova, J. V. (2019). Sex differences in jealousy. In Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1740-1Google Scholar
Valentova, J. V., de Moraes, A. C., & Varella, M. A. C. (2020). Gender, sexual orientation and type of relationship influence individual differences in jealousy: A large Brazilian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109805.Google Scholar
Valentova, J. V., Fernandez, A. M., Pereira, M., & Varella, M. A. C. (under review). Jealousy is influenced by sex and sexual orientation of the individual, and sex of the rival: Evidence from Brazil, Chile and Portugal. Archives of Sexual Behavior.Google Scholar
van Brummen-Girigori, O., Buunk, A. P., Dijkstra, P., & Girigori, A. (2016). Father abandonment and jealousy: A study among women on Curacao. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 181–184.Google Scholar
Wade, T. J., Auer, G., & Roth, T. M. (2009). What is love: Further investigation of love acts. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3, 290–304.Google Scholar
Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., … & Zupančič, M. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31(4), 408–423.Google Scholar
Walum, H., Larsson, H., Westberg, L., Lichtenstein, P., & Magnusson, P. K. (2013). Sex differences in jealousy: A population-based twin study in Sweden. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16(5), 941–947.Google Scholar
Webb, C. E., Kolff, K., Du, X., & de Waal, F. (2020). Jealous behavior in chimpanzees elicited by social intruders. Affective Science, 1(4), 199–207.Google Scholar
White, G. L. (1981a). A model of romantic jealousy. Motivation and Emotion, 5(4), 295–310.Google Scholar
White, G. L. (1981b). Relative involvement, inadequacy, and jealousy. Alternative Lifestyles, 4(3), 291–309.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1994). Adaptive genetic variation and human evolutionary psychology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(4), 219–235.Google Scholar
Wright, E. C., Hostinar, C. E., & Trainor, B. C. (2020). Anxious to see you: Neuroendocrine mechanisms of social vigilance and anxiety during adolescence. European Journal of Neuroscience, 52(1), 2516–2529.Google Scholar
Zandbergen, D. L., & Brown, S. G. (2015). Culture and gender differences in romantic jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 122–127.Google Scholar
Zengel, B., Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2013). Sex differences in jealousy in response to infidelity: Evaluation of demographic moderators in a national random sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(1), 47–51.Google Scholar

References

Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Fivush, R., Lilgendahl, J. P., Lodi-Smith, J., McAdams, D. … & Syed, M. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social and Personality Psychological Science, 8, 519–527. doi: 10.1177/1948550617698202Google Scholar
Adler, J. M., Lodi-Smith, J., Philippe, F. L., & Houle, I. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well-being: A review of the field and recommendations for the future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 142–175. doi: 10.1177/1088868315585068Google Scholar
Adler, J. M., Turner, A. F., Brookshier, K. M., Monahan, C., Walder- Biesanz, I., Harmeling, L. H., … & Oltmanns, T. F. (2015). Variation in narrative identity is associated with trajectories of mental health over several years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 476–496. doi: 10.1037/a0038601Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969–1025. doi: 10.2307/1127008Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1974). Citation for the G. Stanley Hall Award to John Bowlby. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1990). Epilogue. In Greenberg, M. T., Ciccheti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 463–488). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1969). Some contemporary patterns of mother-infant interaction in the feeding situation. In Ambrose, A. (Ed.), Stimulation in early infancy (pp. 133–170). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 49–67. doi: 10.2307/1127388Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. J. (1971). Individual differences in strange-situation behaviour of one-year-olds. In Shaffer, H. R. (Ed.), The origins of human social relations (pp. 17–57). London & New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46, 333–341. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.333Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Wittig, B. A. (1969). Attachment and exploratory behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. In Foss, B. M. (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 111–136). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2009). The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: Distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups. Attachment & Human Development, 11, 223–263. doi: 10.1080/14616730902814762Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178. doi: 10.1177/0265407590072001Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497Google Scholar
Beckes, L., & Simpson, J. A. (2009). Attachment, reproduction, and life history trade-offs: A broader view of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 23–24. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000016Google Scholar
Behrens, K. Y., Hesse, E., & Main, M. (2007). Mothers’ attachment status as determined by the Adult Attachment Interview predicts their 6-year-olds’ reunion responses: A study conducted in Japan. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1553–1567. doi: 0.1037/0012–1649.43.6.1553Google Scholar
Beller, E. K. (1955). Dependency and independence in young children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 87, 25–35. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1955.10532913Google Scholar
Beller, E. K. (1959). Exploratory studies of dependency. Transactions of New York Academy of Sciences, 21, 414–426. doi: 10.1111/j.2164Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (2002). Why the “transmission gap” in attachment research: Differential susceptibility to rearing influence? Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2, 163–183. doi: 10.1080/15289168.2002.10486426Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670. doi: 10.2307/1131166Google Scholar
Bosmans, G., & Kerns, K. A. (2015). Attachment in middle childhood: Progress and prospects. In Bosmans, G. & Kerns, K. A. (Eds.), Attachment in middle childhood: Theoretical advances and new directions in an emerging field. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 148, 1–14. doi: 10.1002/cad.20100Google Scholar
Borelli, J. L., David, D. H., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Sbarra, D. A., Mehl, M. R., & Mayes, L. C. (2013). Language use in the Adult Attachment Interview: Evidence for attachment-specific emotion regulation. Personal Relationships, 20, 23–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01394.xGoogle Scholar
Borelli, J. L., Sbarra, D. A., Mehl, M., & David, D. H. (2011). Experiential connectedness in children’s attachment interviews: An examination of natural word use. Personal Relationships, 18, 341–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01294.xGoogle Scholar
Borelli, J. L., Somers, J., West, J. L., Coffey, J. K., De Los Reyes, A., & Shmueli-Goetz, Y. (2015). Associations between attachment narratives and self-report measures of attachment in middle childhood: Extending evidence for the validity of the Child Attachment Interview. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 1235–1246. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0310-8Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1953). Critical phases in the development of social responses in man and other animals. New Biology, 14, 25–32.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28, 759–775. doi: 10.1037/0012–1649.28.5.759Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54, 11–32.Google Scholar
Bühler, J., & Dunlop, W. L. (2019). The narrative identity approach and romantic relationships. Social and Personality Psychological Compass, e12447. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12447Google Scholar
Campbell, L., & Marshall, T. (2011). Anxious attachment and relationship processes: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Personality, 79, 1219–1249. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00723.xGoogle Scholar
Campos, J. J., Barrett, K. C., Lamb, M. E., Goldsmith, H. H., & Stenberg, C. (1983). Socioemotional development. In Haith, M. M. & Campos, J. J. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Infancy and psychobiology (pp. 783–915). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chen, B-B., & Li, D. (2009). Avoidant strategy in insecure females. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 26–27. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000016Google Scholar
Davila, J., & Sargent, E. (2003). The meaning of life (events) predicts change in attachment security. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1383–1395. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256374Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000016Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 193–214. doi: 10.1177/0146167210392789Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Sex differences in attachment emerge in middle childhood: An evolutionary hypothesis. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 97–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00125.xGoogle Scholar
Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1070–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.xGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, W. L. (2015). Contextualized personality, beyond traits. European Journal of Personality, 29, 310–325. doi: 10.1002/per.1995Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L. (2019). Love as story, love as storytelling. Personal Relationships, 26, 114–136. doi: 10.1111/pere.12271Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Bühler, J., Maghsoodi, A., Harake, N., Wilkinson, D., & McAdams, D. P. (2020). The stories couples live by. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi: 10.1177/0265407520969900Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Hanley, G. E., & McCoy, T. P. (2019). The narrative psychology of love lives. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 761–784. doi: 10.1177/0265407517744385Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Harake, N., Gray, J., Hanley, G. E., & McCoy, T. P. (2018). The rises and falls of romance: Considering redemption, contamination, and affective tone in the narrative construction of love lives. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.01.003Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Karan, A., Harake, N., & Wilkinson, D. W. (2020). Love in the first degree: Individual differences in first-person pronoun use and adult romantic attachment styles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 254–265. doi: 10.1177/1948550619847455Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). Sobering stories: Narratives of self-redemption predict behavioral change and improved health among recovering alcoholics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 576–590. doi: 10.1037/a0031185Google Scholar
Ein-Dor, T., Mikulincer, M., Doron, G., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). The attachment paradox: How can so many of us (the insecure ones) have no adaptive advantage? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 123–141. doi: 10.1177/1745691610362349Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., … & Jacobs, W. J. (2006). Consilience and Life History Theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243–275. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.002Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 123–151. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_03Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C. (2019). Attachment in adulthood: Recent developments, emerging debates, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 401–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102813Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Marks, M. J. (2005). The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 731–746. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.751Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154. doi:10.1O37//1089-2680.4.2.132Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Spieker, S. J. (2003). Are infant attachment patterns continuously or categorically distributed? A taxometric analysis of strange situation behavior. Developmental Psychology, 39, 387–404. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.387Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350Google Scholar
Freeman, H., & Brown, B. B. (2001). Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: Differences by attachment style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 653–674. doi: 0047-2891/01/1200-0653$19.50/0Google Scholar
Freud, A. (1946). The psychoanalytic study of infantile feeding disturbances. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2, 119–132. doi: 10.1080/00797308.1946.11823541Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1938). An outline of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1996). Adult Attachment Interview protocol. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Granqvist, P. (2020). Attachment, culture, and gene-culture co-evolution: Expanding the evolutionary toolbox of attachment theory. Attachment & Human Development. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1709086Google Scholar
Gray, J., & Dunlop, W. L. (2019). Structure and measurement invariance of adult romantic attachment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 171–180. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1391274Google Scholar
Hammack, P. L. (2008). Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 222–247. doi: 10.1177/1088868308316892Google Scholar
Harake, N., & Dunlop, W. L. (2020). Storying the heartbreak: The transformational processing of romantic breakups. Narrative Inquiry, 30, 18–40. doi: 10.1075/ni.18064.harGoogle Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1959). Love in infant monkeys. Scientific American, 200, 68–86.Google Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1963). Dependency and independence. In Stevenson, H. W. (Ed.), Child psychology: The sixty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 333–363). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511Google Scholar
Hesse, E. (2008). The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 552–598). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1932). The psychoanalysis of children (The International Psycho-analytical Library, No. 22).Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1952). Some theoretical conclusions regarding the emotional life of the infant. In Klein, M., Heimann, P., Isaacs, S., & Riviere, J. (Eds.), Developments in psychoanalysis (pp. 198–236). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Leary, M. R., & Buttermore, N. R. (2003). The evolution of the human self: Tracing the natural history of self-awareness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33, 365–404. doi:10.1046/j.1468-5914.2003.00223.xGoogle Scholar
Lilgendahl, J. P., & McLean, K. C. (2019). Narrative identity processes and patterns of adjustment across the transition to college: A developmentally contextualized approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000277Google Scholar
Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1998). Adult attachment scoring and classification system, Version 6.0. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Main, M., Goldwyn, R., & Hesse, E. (2003). Adult attachment scoring and classification system, Version 7.2. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66–104. doi: 10.2307/3333827Google Scholar
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In Greenberg, M. T., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, M. E. (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 121–160). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00500.xGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2008). The life story interview. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295. doi: 10.1177/1745691612464657Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2019). First we invented stories, then they changed us: The evolution of narrative identity. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 3, 1–18. doi: 10.26613/esic.3.1.110Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A., & Bowman, P. J. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative, and their relation to psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults and in students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 472–483. doi: 10.1177/0146167201274008Google Scholar
McCoy, T. P., & Dunlop, W. L. (2016). Contextualizing narrative identity: A consideration of assessment settings. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.006Google Scholar
McLean, K. C., & Syed, M. (2015). Personal, master, and alternative narratives: An integrative framework for understanding identity development in context. Human Development, 58, 318–349. doi: 10.1159/000445817Google Scholar
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Pasupathi, M., Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Drustrup, D., … & McCoy, T. P. (2020). The empirical structure of narrative identity: The initial big three. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 920–944. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000247Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G., Woddis, D., & Nachmias, O. (2000). Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 509–523. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.509Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pianka, E. R. (1970). On r- and K-selection. The American Naturalist, 104, 592–596.Google Scholar
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (2000). The internal working model concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology, 4, 155–175. doi: 10.1037/1089–2680.4.2.155Google Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., Fraley, R. C., Clausell, E., & Clarke, A. (2007). The Adult Attachment Interview and self- reports of attachment style: An empirical rapprochement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 678–697. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.678Google Scholar
Sarbin, T. (Ed.). (1986). The narrative as a root metaphor for psychology. Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Scharfe, E. (2017). Sex differences in attachment. In Shackelford, T. K. & Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–5). New York, NY: Springer International.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 31, 747–768. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271843Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on romantic attachment and culture: How ecological stressors influence dismissing orientations across genders and geographies. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 230–247. doi: 10.1177/1069397108317485Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, I. U., Austers, I., Bannett, K. L., … & Zapancic, A. (2003). Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions. Personal Relationships, 10, 307–331. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00052Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment theory and research: Resurrection of the psychodynamic approach to personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 22–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.002Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971–980. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2008). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Shaver, P. R. & Cassidy, J. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 2nd ed. (pp. 131–157). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Spitz, R. A. (1965). The first year of life. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (2005). Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 349–367. doi: 10.1080/14616730500365928Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A., Carlson, E. A., Levy, A. K., & Egeland, B. (1999). Implications of attachment theory for developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 1–13. doi: 10.1017/s0954579499001923Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., & Kreutzer, T. (1990). The fate of early experience following developmental change: Longitudinal approaches to individual adaptation in childhood. Child Development, 61, 1363–1373. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02867.xGoogle Scholar
Szepsenwol, O., & Simpson, J. A. (2019). Attachment within life history theory: An evolution perspective on individual differences in attachment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 65–70. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.03.005Google Scholar
Target, M., Fonagy, P., Shmueli-Goetz, , Data, A., & Schneider, T. (2007). The Child Attachment Interview (CAI) protocol. London: University College LondonGoogle Scholar
van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (1996). Attachment representations in mothers, fathers, adolescents, and clinical groups: A meta- analytic search for normative data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 8–21. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.1.8Google Scholar
van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2019). Bridges across the intergenerational transmission of attachment gap. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.014Google Scholar
Van Rosmalen, L., Van der Veer, R., & Van der Horst, F. C. P. (2015). Ainsworth’s Strange Situation procedure: The origin of an instrument. Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 51, 261–284. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21729Google Scholar
Waters, E., Weinfield, N. S., & Hamilton, C. E. (2000). The stability of attachment security from infancy to adolescence and early adulthood: General discussion. Child Development, 71, 703–706. doi: 0009-3920/2000/7103-0016Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. (2005). Foreword from the scientific side. In Gottschall, J. & Wilson, D. S. (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. vii–xi). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1963). The child, the family, and the outside world. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Home is where we start from: Essays in psycholanalysis. Compiled and edited by Winnicott, C., Shepherd, S., & Davis, M.. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

References

Adinkrah, M. (2000). Maternal infanticide in Fiji. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1543–1555.Google Scholar
Alder, C., & Polk, K. (2001). Child victims of homicide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D. (1979). Darwinism and human affairs. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Bourget, D., & Gagné, P. (2002). Maternal filicide in Quebec. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30, 345–351.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2005). The murderer next door. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Camperio Ciani, A. S., & Fontanesi, L. (2012). Mothers who kill their offspring: Testing evolutionary hypothesis in a 110-case Italian sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 519–527.Google Scholar
d’Orban, P. T. (1979). Women who kill their children. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 560–571.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1994). Some differential attributes of lethal assaults on small children by stepfathers versus genetic fathers. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 207–217.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2001). An assessment of some proposed exceptions to the phenomenon of nepotistic discrimination against stepchildren. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 38, 287–296.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2007). The evolutionary biology of cryptic pregnancy: A re-appraisal of the “denied pregnancy” phenomenon. Medical Hypotheses, 68, 250–258.Google Scholar
Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The origins of homicide. In Duntley, J. D. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary forensic psychology – Darwinian foundations of crime and law (pp. 41–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Homicide adaptions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 399–410.Google Scholar
Durrant, J. E. (1999). Evaluating the success of Sweden’s corporal punishment ban. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 435–448.Google Scholar
Durrant, J. E., & Janson, S. (2005). Law reform, corporal punishment and child abuse – the case of Sweden. International Review of Victimology, 12, 139–158.Google Scholar
Flynn, S. M., Shaw, J. J., & Abel, K. M. (2007). Homicide of infants: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68, 1501–1509.Google Scholar
Friedman, S. H., Hrouda, D. R., Holden, C. E., Noffsinger, S. G., & Resnick, P. J. (2005). Filicide-suicide: Common factors in parents who kill their children and themselves. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33, 496–504.Google Scholar
Gheorghe, A., Banner, J., Hansen, S. H., Stolborg, U., & Lynnerup, N. (2011). Abandonment of newborn infants: A Danish forensic medical survey 1997–2008. Forensic Science, Medicine & Pathology, 7, 317–321. doi: 10.1007/s12024-011-9253-6Google Scholar
Haig, D. (1993). Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Quarterly Review of Biology, 68(4), 495–532.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.Google Scholar
Harris, G. T., Hilton, N. Z., Rice, M. E., & Eke, A. W. (2007). Children killed by genetic parents versus stepparents. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 85–95.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature – maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Kauppi, A., Kumpulainen, K., Karkola, K., Vanamo, T., & Merikanto, J. (2010). Maternal and paternal filicides: A retrospective review of filicides in Finland. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38, 229–238.Google Scholar
Laurssen, T. M., Munk-Olsen, T., Mortensen, P. B., Abel, K. M., Appleby, M., & Webb, R. T. (2011). Filicide in offspring of parents with severe psychiatric disorders: A population-based cohort study of child homicide. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72, 698–703.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. F., & Bunce, S. C. (2003). Filicidal mothers and the impact of psychosis on maternal filicide. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 459–470Google Scholar
Liem, M., & Koenraadt, F. (2008). Filicide: A comparative study of maternal versus paternal child homicide. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 18, 166–176.Google Scholar
Marks, M.N., & Kumar, R. (1993). Infanticide in England & Wales. Medicine, Science and the Law, 4, 329–339.Google Scholar
Ottesen, V. (2012). A current absence of neonaticide. Scandinavian Journal of Forensic Science, 18(2), 155–163.Google Scholar
Ottesen, V. (2016). An evolutionary psychological analysis of filicide in Norway, 1990–2009. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology. University of Oslo. Retrieved from www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/50525Google Scholar
Ottesen, V. (2020). Filicide. In Shackelford, T. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2288-1Google Scholar
Overpeck, M. D., Brenner, R. A., Trumble, A. C., Trifiletti, L. B., & Berendes, H. W. (1998). Risk factors for infant homicide in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1211–1216.Google Scholar
Resnick, P. J. (1969). Child murder by parents: A psychiatric review of filicide. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126(3), 325–334.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., & Beasley, S. L. (2005). An exploratory analysis of the context and circumstances of filicide-suicide in Chicago, 1965–1994. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 399–406.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2005). Culture, scarcity and maternal thinking. In Spinelli, Mararet G. (Ed.), Infanticide – psychosocial and legal perspectives on mothers who kill (pp. 119–130). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Somander, L. K. H., & Rammer, L. M. (1991). Intra- and extra-familial child homicide in Sweden 1971–1980. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 45–55.Google Scholar
Stone, M. H., Steinmeyer, E., Dreher, J., & Krischer, M. (2005). Infanticide in female forensic patients: The view from the evolutionary standpoint. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 11, 35–45.Google Scholar
Tang, D., & Siu, B. (2018). Maternal infanticide and filicide in a psychiatric custodial institution in Hong Kong. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry, 28(4), 139–143.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.Google Scholar
Weekes-Shackelford, V.A., & Shackelford, T. (2004). Methods of filicide: Stepparents and genetic parents kill differently. Violence & Victims, 19(1), 75–81.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Postcopulatory Adaptations
  • Edited by Todd K. Shackelford, Oakland University, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
  • Online publication: 30 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943567.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Postcopulatory Adaptations
  • Edited by Todd K. Shackelford, Oakland University, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
  • Online publication: 30 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943567.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Postcopulatory Adaptations
  • Edited by Todd K. Shackelford, Oakland University, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
  • Online publication: 30 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943567.016
Available formats
×