Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:59:09.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Postcopulatory Adaptations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Edited by
Todd K. Shackelford
Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Oakland University, Michigan
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology , pp. 323 - 516
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anderson, K. G. (2006). How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Results from worldwide nonpaternity rates. Current Anthropology, 48, 511–518.Google Scholar
Baker, R. (2013). Sexual whodunits and evolutionary psychology. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation, and infidelity. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Bruce, H. M. (1959). An exteroceptive block to pregnancy in the mouse. Nature, 105, 184.Google Scholar
Burch, R. L., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2004). Pregnancy as a stimulus for domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, R. L., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2019). Abusive men are driven by paternal uncertainty. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, B. (1976). Swinging: In retrospect. The Journal of Sex Research, 12, 220–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Ampel, B. C. (2017). Sibling resemblance and the effects of gamete formation, independent reassortment, paternal uncertainty, twining and adoption. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11, 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Burch, R. L. (2004). Semen displacement as a sperm competition strategy in humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Burch, R. L. (2006). The semen displacement hypothesis: Semen hydraulics and the intra-pair copulation proclivity model of female infidelity. In Platek, S & Shackelford, T (Eds.), Female infidelity and paternal uncertainty: Evolutionary perspectives on male anti-cuckoldry tactics (pp. 129–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Burch, R. L. (in press). Intimate partner violence and relationship maintenance. In Mogilski, J & Shackelford, T (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and romantic relationships. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., Burch, R. L., & Berens Mitchell, T. J. (2006). Semen displacement as a sperm competition strategy: Multiple mating, self-semen displacement, and timing of in-pair copulations. Human Nature, 17, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup, G. G., Jr., Burch, R. L., & Petricone, L. (2012). Sexual conflict, infidelity, and vaginal/semen chemistry. In Shackelford, T & Goetz, A (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sexual conflict in humans (pp. 217–232). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., Burch, R. L., Zappieri, M. L., Parvez, R. A., Stockwell, M. L., & Davis, J. A. (2003). The human penis as a semen displacement device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 277–289.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., Finn, M. M., & Sammis, B. (2009). On the origin of descended scrotal testicles: The activation hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 517–524.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., Stolz, J. A., Burch, R. L., & Bremser, J. A. (2019). How evolutionary studies enables people to think outside the box. In Geher, G, Gallup, A. C, & Head, H (Eds.), Evolutionary studies: Darwin’s road map to the curriculum (pp. 321–362). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G., Jr., Towne, J. P., & Stolz, J. A. (2018). An evolutionary perspective on orgasm. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature, 17, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, S. M., Aung, T., Harrison, M. A., LaFayette, J. N., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2020). Experimental evidence for sex differences in sexual variety preferences: Support for the Coolidge effect in humans. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50, 495–509.Google Scholar
Moore, K. L., Persaud, T. V. N., & Torchia, M. G. (2015). Before we are born e-Book: Essentials of embryology and birth defects with STUDENT CONSULT online access. New York, NY: Elsevier Health Sciences.Google Scholar
O’Hara, K., & O’Hara, J. (1999). The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner. British Journal of Urology, International, 83, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., Panyavin, I. S., Wasserman, B. H., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2002). Reactions to children’s faces: Resemblance matters more for males than females. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 159–166.Google Scholar
Platek, S. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.). (2006). Female infidelity and paternal uncertainty: Evolutionary analysis of anti-cuckoldry tactics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sela, Y., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Pham, M. N. (2015). Female copulatory orgasm and male partner’s attractiveness to his partner and other women. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 152–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachowiak, D., & Bragg, H. (1980). Open marriage and marital adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 57–62.Google Scholar

References

Albert, G., & Arnocky, S. (2016). Use of mate retention strategies. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Allen, E. S., & Atkins, D. C. (2005). The multidimensional and developmental nature of infidelity: Practical applications. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(11), 1371–1382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, U. S., Perea, E. F., Vaughn Becker, D., Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2010). I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 804–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbaro, N., Pham, M. N., Shackelford, T. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2016). Insecure romantic attachment dimensions and frequency of mate retention behaviors. Personal Relationships, 23(3), 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbaro, N., Sela, Y., Atari, M., Shackelford, T. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2019). Romantic attachment and mate retention behavior: The mediating role of perceived risk of partner infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(3), 940–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6(2), 166–203.Google Scholar
Baxter, C. M., Barnett, R., & Dukas, R. (2015). Aggression, mate guarding and fitness in male fruit flies. Animal Behaviour, 109, 235–241.Google Scholar
Bobst, C., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2012). Men’s preference for the ovulating female is triggered by subtle face shape differences. Hormones and Behavior, 62(4), 413–417.Google Scholar
Brady, A., Baker, L. R., & Miller, R. S. (2020). Look but don’t touch? Self-regulation determines whether noticing attractive alternatives increases infidelity. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 135–144.Google Scholar
Breuer, T., Robbins, A. M., Boesch, C., & Robbins, M. M. (2012). Phenotypic correlates of male reproductive success in western gorillas. Journal of Human Evolution, 62(4), 466–472.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(5), 291–317.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2002). Human mate guarding. Neuro-Endocrinology Letters, 23 Suppl. 4, 23–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. (2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 155–160.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–256.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 77–110.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 346–361.Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2004). Gender differences in rival characteristics that evoke jealousy in response to emotional versus sexual infidelity. Personal Relationships, 11(4), 395–408.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., & Ellis, B. J. (2015). Commitment, love, and mate retention. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470939376.ch14Google Scholar
Chaudhary, N., Al-Shawaf, L., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Mate competition in Pakistan: Mate value, mate retention, and competitor derogation. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 141–146.Google Scholar
Cobey, K. D., Buunk, A. P., Pollet, T. V., Klipping, C., & Roberts, S. C. (2013). Men perceive their female partners, and themselves, as more attractive around ovulation. Biological Psychology, 94(3), 513–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connidis, I. (2001). Family ties and aging. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Connor, R. C., & Krützen, M. (2015). Male dolphin alliances in Shark Bay: Changing perspectives in a 30-year study. Animal Behaviour, 103, 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy-Beam, D., Goetz, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2015). Chapter one – Why do humans form long-term mateships? An evolutionary game-theoretic model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–39.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Evolutionary social psychology and family homicide. Science, 242(4878), 519–524.Google Scholar
Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
Davies, A. P. C., Shackelford, T. K., & Hass, R. G. (2007). When a “poach” is not a poach: Re-defining human mate poaching and re-estimating its frequency. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(5), 702–716.Google Scholar
de Miguel, A., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Mate retention tactics in Spain: Personality, sex differences, and relationship status. Journal of Personality, 79(3), 563–586.Google Scholar
Dillon, L., Nowak, N., Shattuck, K., Weisfeld, G., Weisfeld, C., Imamoğlu, E., … & Jiliang, S. (2014). When the cat’s away, the spouse will play: A cross-cultural examination of mate guarding in married couples. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2–4), 97–108.Google Scholar
Druckerman, P. (2007). Lust in translation: The rules of infidelity from Tokyo to Tennessee. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Elias, D. O., Sivalinghem, S., Mason, A. C., Andrade, M. C., & Kasumovic, M. M. (2014). Mate-guarding courtship behaviour: Tactics in a changing world. Animal Behaviour, 97, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, A. M., Vera-Villarroel, P., Sierra, J. C., & Zubeidat, I. (2007). Distress in response to emotional and sexual infidelity: Evidence of evolved gender differences in Spanish students. Null, 141(1), 17–24.Google Scholar
Fife, S. T., Weeks, G. R., & Gambescia, N. (2008). Treating infidelity: An Integrative approach. The Family Journal, 16(4), 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., & May, R. W. (2017). Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 70–74.Google Scholar
Flinn, M. V. (1988). Mate guarding in a Caribbean village. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J. D., Jonason, P. K., Shrira, I., Keith Campbell, W., Shiverdecker, L. K., & Varner, S. C. (2014). What do you get when you make somebody else’s partner your own? An analysis of relationships formed via mate poaching. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partner’s mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269(1494), 975–982.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature, 17(3), 265–282.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Romero, G. A., Kaighobadi, F., & Miner, E. J. (2008). Punishment, proprietariness, and paternity: Men’s violence against women from an evolutionary perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 481–489.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Euler, H. A., Hoier, S., Schmitt, D. P., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2005). Mate retention, semen displacement, and human sperm competition: A preliminary investigation of tactics to prevent and correct female infidelity. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(4), 749–763.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. K., Spitzberg, B. H., & Yoshimura, S. M. (2004). Sexual and emotional jealousy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hayward, A., & Gillooly, J. F. (2011). The cost of sex: Quantifying energetic investment in gamete production by males and females. PLoS One, 6(1), e16557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016557Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2012). The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 657–669.Google Scholar
Holley, A., Shalev, S., Bellevue, S., & Pfaus, J. G. (2014). Conditioned mate-guarding behavior in the female rat. Physiology & Behavior, 131, 136–141.Google Scholar
Jankowiak, W. R., & Fischer, E. F. (1992). A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31(2), 149–155.Google Scholar
Jonason, P. K., Cetrulo, J. F., Madrid, J. M., & Morrison, C. (2009). Gift-giving as a courtship or mate-retention tactic? Insights from non-human models. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1). doi: 10.1177/147470490900700112Google Scholar
Kaighobadi, F., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Female attractiveness mediates the relationship between in-pair copulation frequency and men’s mate retention behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(4), 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2014). From mate retention to murder: Evolutionary psychological perspectives on men’s partner-directed violence. Review of General Psychology, 13(4). doi: 10.1037/a0017254Google Scholar
Kaighobadi, F., Starratt, V. G., Shackelford, T. K., & Popp, D. (2008). Male mate retention mediates the relationship between female sexual infidelity and female-directed violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(6), 1422–1431.Google Scholar
Kardum, I., Knežević, J. H., & Gračanin, A. (2006). Sociosexuality and mate retention in romantic couples. Psychological Topics, 15(2), 277–296.Google Scholar
Kenagy, G. J., & Trombulak, S. C. (1986). Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size. Journal of Mammalogy, 67(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Kennair, L. E. O., Wyckoff, J. P., Asao, K., Buss, D. M., & Bendixen, M. (2018). Why do women regret casual sex more than men do? Personality and Individual Differences, 127, 61–67.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Trost, M. R. (2004). Evolutionary approaches to relationships. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Kleiman, D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 52(1), 39–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komiya, A., Ohtsubo, Y., Nakanishi, D., & Oishi, S. (2019). Gift-giving in romantic couples serves as a commitment signal: Relational mobility is associated with more frequent gift-giving. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(2), 160–166.Google Scholar
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopes, G. S., Shackelford, T. K., Santos, W. S., Farias, M. G., & Segundo, D. S. A. (2016). Mate Retention Inventory-Short Form (MRI-SF): Adaptation to the Brazilian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 36–40.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. (2004). Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 15(4), 365–376.Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Kurzban, R., & Tabak, B. A. (2013). Putting revenge and forgiveness in an evolutionary context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 41–58.Google Scholar
Mikton, C. R., Butchart, A., Dahlberg, L. L., & Krug, E. G. (2016). Global status report on violence prevention 2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(5), 652–659.Google Scholar
Miller, S. L., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Sex differences in response to sexual versus emotional infidelity: The moderating role of individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(3), 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner, E. J., Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). It’s not all about her: Men’s mate value and mate retention. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 214–218.Google Scholar
Næss, S., Blekesaune, M., & Jakobsson, N. (2015). Marital transitions and life satisfaction: Evidence from longitudinal data from Norway. Acta Sociologica, 58(1), 63–78.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 29–51.Google Scholar
Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 321–330.Google Scholar
Packer, C., Gilbert, D. A., Pusey, A. E., & O’Brien, S. J. (1991). A molecular genetic analysis of kinship and cooperation in African lions. Nature, 351(6327), 562–565.Google Scholar
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
Piemonte, J. L., Conley, T. D., & Gusakova, S. (2019). Orgasm, gender, and responses to heterosexual casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109487. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.030Google Scholar
Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokop, P., & Pazda, A. D. (2016). Women’s red clothing can increase mate-guarding from their male partner. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 114–117.Google Scholar
Puts, D. (2016). Human sexual selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 28–32.Google Scholar
Reichel, D. (2017). Determinants of intimate partner violence in Europe: The role of socioeconomic status, inequality, and partner behavior. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(12), 1853–1873.Google Scholar
Salmon, C. (2017). Long-term romantic relationships: Adaptationist approaches. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scelza, B. A. (2014). Jealousy in a small-scale, natural fertility population: The roles of paternity, investment and love in jealous response. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(2), 103–108.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person’s partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 560–584.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 894–917.Google Scholar
Schülke, O., Heistermann, M., & Ostner, J. (2014). Lack of evidence for energetic costs of mate-guarding in wild male Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). International Journal of Primatology, 35(3), 677–700.Google Scholar
Schwarz, S., & Hassebrauck, M. (2012). Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences. Human Nature, 23(4), 447–466.Google Scholar
Seidelmann, K. (2015). Double insurance of paternity by a novel type of mating plug in a monandrous solitary mason bee Osmia bicornis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 115(1), 28–37.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K. (2003). Preventing, correcting, and anticipating female infidelity: Three adaptive problems of sperm competition. Evolution and Cognition, 9(2), 90–96. Retrieved from www.toddkshackelford.com/downloads/Shackelford-EC-2003.pdfGoogle Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., Buss, D. M., Euler, H. A., & Hoier, S. (2005). When we hurt the ones we love: Predicting violence against women from men’s mate retention. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 447–463.Google Scholar
Starratt, V. G., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Mckibbin, W. F. (2007). Male mate retention behaviors vary with risk of partner infidelity and sperm competition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39(3), 523–527.Google Scholar
Tafoya, M. A., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2007). The dark side of infidelity: Its nature, prevalence, and communicative functions. The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication, 2, 201–242.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983). The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Wade, T., Mogilski, J., & Schoenberg, R. (2018). Sex differences in reconciliation behavior after romantic conflict. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., & Asao, K. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31(4), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, D. P. (1998). Coalitionary mate guarding by male chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 44(1), 43–55.Google Scholar
White, G. L. (1981). A model of romantic jealousy. Motivation and Emotion, 5(4), 295–310.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R., Laß, I., Butterworth, P., & Vera-Toscano, E. (2019). The household, income and labour dynamics in Australia survey: Selected findings from waves 1 to 17. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute, Applied Economic & Social Research, University of Melbourne. Retrieved from https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/3127664/HILDA-Statistical-Report-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). An evolutionary psychological perspective on male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Violence and Victims, 8(3), 271–294.Google Scholar
Wood, B. M., & Marlowe, F. W. (2013). Household and kin provisioning by Hadza men. Human Nature, 24(3), 280–317.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, G. J., Wang, W., & Wu, C. (2000). Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature, 403(6767), 304–309.Google Scholar
Zuo, B., Wen, F., & Wu, Y. (2019). Sex differences in mate retention and mate quality enhancement: The effect of facial sexual dimorphism cues on willingness to introduce a new friend to one’s partner. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 48, 1785–1794.Google Scholar

References

Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838.Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Little, A. C., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers. Perception, 36(12), 1813–1820.Google Scholar
Arnocky, S. (2018). Self-perceived mate value, facial attractiveness, and mate preferences: Do desirable men want it all? Evolutionary Psychology, 16(1). doi: 10.1177/1474704918763271Google Scholar
Baker, R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation and infidelity. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 16, 395–424.Google Scholar
Baudouin, J. Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117(3), 313–332.Google Scholar
Bernstein, I. H., Lin, T., & McClellan, P. (1983). Cross- vs. within-racial judgements of attractiveness. Perception and Psychophysics, 32(6), 495–503.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 157–215). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bobst, C., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2014). Is preference for ovulatory females’ faces associated with men’s testosterone levels? Hormones and Behavior, 66(3), 487–492.Google Scholar
Brand, R. J., Markey, C. M., Mills, A., & Hodges, S. D. (2007). Sex differences in self-reported infidelity and its correlates. Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 101–109.Google Scholar
Burch, R. L., Moran, J. B., & Wade, T. J. (2021). The reproductive priming effect revisited: Mate poaching, mate copying, or both? Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 251–264. doi: 10.1037/ebs0000232Google Scholar
Burch, R. L., & Widman, D. R. (2021). The point of nipple erection 1: The experience and projection of perceived emotional states while viewing women with and without erect nipples. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 15(3), 305–311. doi: 10.1037/ebs0000244Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 346–361.Google Scholar
Byrne, D., Griffitt, W., & Stefaniak, D. (1967). Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(1), 82–90.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. L. (2018). Sexuality now: Embracing diversity. New York, NY: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Cherney, E. F., & Bermant, G. (1970). The role of stimulus female novelty in the rearousal of copulation in male laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). Animal Behaviour, 18, 567–574.Google Scholar
Cobey, K. D., Buunk, A. P., Pollet, T. V., Klipping, C., & Roberts, S. C. (2013). Men perceive their female partners, and themselves, as more attractive around ovulation. Biological Psychology, 94(3), 513–516.Google Scholar
Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2019). Why is age so important in human mating? Evolved age preferences and their influences on multiple mating behaviors. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 127–157.Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Wu, C., Barbee, A. P., & Druen, P. B. (1995). Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 261–279.Google Scholar
Dainton, M., & Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships. Communication Research Reports, 25, 179–191.Google Scholar
Danel, D. P., Kalinowski, K., Nowak-Szczepanska, N., Ziomkiewicz-Wichary, A., Apanasewicz, A., Borysławski, K., … & Fedurek, P. (2020). Shifts in female facial attractiveness during pregnancy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145176Google Scholar
Dewsbury, D. A. (1981). Effects of novelty on copulatory behavior: The Coolidge effect and related phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 89(3), 464–482.Google Scholar
Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.Google Scholar
Dixson, B. J., Duncan, M., & Dixson, A. F. (2015). The role of breast size and areolar pigmentation in perceptions of women’s sexual attractiveness, reproductive health, sexual maturity, maternal nurturing abilities, and age. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(6), 1685–1695.Google Scholar
Dixson, B. J., Grimshaw, G. M., Linklater, W. L., & Dixson, A. F. (2011). Eye tracking of men’s preferences for female breast size and areola pigmentation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(1), 51–58.Google Scholar
Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in women’s choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and laboratory task-based evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1451–1460.Google Scholar
Eva, K. W., & Wood, T. J. (2006). Are all the taken men good? An indirect examination of mate-choice copying in humans. Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), 175(12), 1573–1574.Google Scholar
Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Smith, M. L., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., … & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49(2), 215–222.Google Scholar
Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 981–993.Google Scholar
Fernandes, H. B. F., Kennair, L. E. O., Hutz, C. S., Natividade, J. C., & Kruger, D. J. (2016). Are negative postcoital emotions a product of evolutionary adaptation? Multinational relationships with sexual strategies, reputation, and mate quality. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10(4), 219–244.Google Scholar
Fink, B., Matts, P. J., Klingenberg, H., Kuntze, S., Weege, B., & Grammer, K. (2008). Visual attention to variation in female facial skin color distribution. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 7(2), 155–161.Google Scholar
Fink, B., Neave, N., Manning, J. T., & Grammer, K. (2006). Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 491–499.Google Scholar
Fink, B., Weege, B., Manning, J. T., & Trivers, R. (2014). Body symmetry and physical strength in human males. American Journal of Human Biology, 26(5), 697–700.Google Scholar
Fischer, J., Semple, S., Fickenscher, G., Jürgens, R., Kruse, E., Heistermann, M., & Amir, O. (2011). Do women’s voices provide cues of the likelihood of ovulation? The importance of sampling regime. PLoS One, 6(9), e24490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024490Google Scholar
Fleischmann, A. A., Spitzberg, B. H., Anderson, P. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2005). Tickling the monster: Jealousy induction in relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(1), 49–73.Google Scholar
Foo, Y. Z., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2017). Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans. Scientific Reports, 7, 39731. doi: 10.1038/srep39731Google Scholar
Frevert, T. K., & Walker, L. S. (2014). Physical attractiveness and social status. Sociology Compass, 8(3), 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisby, B. N., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2012). The “how” and “why” of flirtatious communication between marital partners. Communication Quarterly, 60(4), 465–480.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Swami, V. (2007). Perception of female buttocks and breast size in profile. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Dias, M., & McClelland, A. (1998). The role of body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and breast size in judgments of female attractiveness. Sex Roles, 39(3–4), 311–326.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997a). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69–88.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997b). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In Simpson, J. A. & Kenrick, D. T. (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 73–85.Google Scholar
Garza, R., Pazhoohi, F., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2020). Does ecological harshness influence men’s perceptions of women’s breast size, ptosis, and intermammary distance? Evolutionary Psychological Science, 7(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., Larson, C. M., & Pillsworth, E. G. (2012). Body odor attractiveness as a cue of impending ovulation in women: Evidence from a study using hormone-confirmed ovulation. Hormones and Behavior, 61(2), 157–166.Google Scholar
Givens, D. B. (1978). The nonverbal basis of attraction: Flirtation, courtship, and seduction. Psychiatry, 41(4), 346–359.Google Scholar
Graham, C. A., Janssen, E., & Sanders, S. A. (2000). Effects of fragrance on female sexual arousal and mood across the menstrual cycle. Psychophysiology, 37(1), 76–84.Google Scholar
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.Google Scholar
Grammer, K., Renninger, L., & Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation, and relationship status: Is she dressed to impress? Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 66–74.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B., & Frederick, D. A. (2012). Body image and body type preferences in St. Kitts, Caribbean: A cross-cultural comparison with US samples regarding attitudes towards muscularity, body fat, and breast size. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(3). doi: 10.1177/147470491201000319Google Scholar
Grillot, R. L., Simmons, Z. L., Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2014). Hormonal and morphological predictors of women’s body attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 176–183.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G. (2003). The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 34–47.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The affective shift hypothesis: The functions of emotional changes following sexual intercourse. Personal Relationships, 8(4), 357–369.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske-Rechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51(1), 40–45.Google Scholar
Havlíček, J., Dvořáková, R., Bartoš, L., & Flegr, J. (2006). Non‐advertised does not mean concealed: Body odour changes across the human menstrual cycle. Ethology, 112(1), 81–90.Google Scholar
Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C., & Flegr, J. (2005). Women’s preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1(3), 256–259.Google Scholar
Havlíček, J., Třebický, V., Valentova, J. V., Kleisner, K., Akoko, R. M., Fialová, J., … & Varella, M. A. C. (2017). Men’s preferences for women’s breast size and shape in four cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(2), 217–226.Google Scholar
Henningsen, D. D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: An examination of miscommunication in flirting interactions. Sex Roles, 50(7–8), 481–489.Google Scholar
Hill, S. E., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 635–647.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. (2019). The aroma of arousal: Effects of menstrual cycle phase and women’s sexual arousal state on men’s responsiveness to women’s body odor. Biological Psychology, 142, 54–61.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C. (2015). The idiosyncrasy of beauty: Aesthetic universals and the diversity of taste. In Bundgaard, P. F. & Stjernfelt, F. (Eds.), Investigations into the phenomenology and the ontology of the work of art (pp. 109–127). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Hughes, S. M., Aung, T., Harrison, M. A., LaFayette, J. N., & Gallup, G. G. (2020). Experimental evidence for sex differences in sexual variety preferences: Support for the Coolidge effect in humans. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01730-xGoogle Scholar
Hughes, S. M., & Kruger, D. J. (2011). Sex differences in post-coital behaviors in long- and short-term mating: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 48(5), 496–505.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. L., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2015). Leveling the playing field: Longer acquaintance predicts reduced assortative mating on attractiveness. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1046–1053.Google Scholar
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 251–267.Google Scholar
Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4(3), 271–296.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Gutierres, S. E., & Goldberg, L. L. (1989). Influence of popular erotica on judgments of strangers and mates. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(2), 159–167.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Gabrielidis, C., & Cornelius, J. S. (1996). Adolescents’ age preferences for dating partners: Support for an evolutionary model of life‐history strategies. Child Development, 67(4), 1499–1511.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Zierk, K. L., & Krones, J. M. (1994). Evolution and social cognition: Contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 210–217.Google Scholar
Kirchengast, S., & Gartner, M. (2002). Changes in fat distribution (WHR) and body weight across the menstrual cycle. Collegium Antropologicum, 26, 47–57.Google Scholar
Komori, M., Kawamura, S., & Ishihara, S. (2009). Averageness or symmetry: Which is more important for facial attractiveness? Acta Psychologica, 131(2), 136–142.Google Scholar
Kościński, K. (2019). Breast firmness is of greater importance for women’s attractiveness than breast size. American Journal of Human Biology, 31(5), e23287. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23287Google Scholar
Koukounas, E., & Over, R. (2000). Changes in the magnitude of the eyeblink startle response during habituation of sexual arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(6), 573–584.Google Scholar
Kuukasjärvi, S., Eriksson, C. J., Koskela, E., Mappes, T., Nissinen, K., & Rantala, M. J. (2004). Attractiveness of women’s body odors over the menstrual cycle: the role of oral contraceptives and receiver sex. Behavioral Ecology, 15(4), 579–584.Google Scholar
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423.Google Scholar
Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2019). Evidence supporting nubility and reproductive value as the key to human female physical attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(5), 408–419.Google Scholar
Li, N. P., Yong, J. C., Tov, W., Sng, O., Fletcher, G. J. O., Valentine, K. A., … & Balliet, D. (2013). Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(5), 757–776.Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Caldwell, C. A. (2008). Social influence in human face preference: Men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 140–146.Google Scholar
Little, A. C., & Jones, B. C. (2003). Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(1526), 1759–1763.Google Scholar
Luscombe, B. (2008). Why we flirt. Time, 171(4), 62–65.Google Scholar
Lynn, M. (2009). Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: Realistic tests with restaurant waitresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(5), 737–745.Google Scholar
Ma-Kellams, C., Wang, M. C., & Cardiel, H. (2017). Attractiveness and relationship longevity: Beauty is not what it is cracked up to be. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 146–161.Google Scholar
Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G. H., & Leinster, S. J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(4), 223–236.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. (1998). The nubility hypothesis. Human Nature, 9(3), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBurney, D. H., Zapp, D. J., & Streeter, S. A. (2005). Preferred number of sexual partners: Tails of distributions and tales of mating systems. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(3), 271–278.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Baker, L. R., & Olson, M. A. (2014). Implicit self-evaluations predict changes in implicit partner evaluations. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1649–1657.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., O’Mara, E. M., & Karney, B. R. (2008). Benevolent cognitions as a strategy of relationship maintenance: “Don’t sweat the small stuff” … But it is not all small stuff. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 631–646.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., Makhanova, A., Hicks, L. L., French, J. E., McNulty, J. K., & Bradbury, T. N. (2017). Quantifying the sexual afterglow: The lingering benefits of sex and their implications for pair-bonded relationships. Psychological Science, 28(5), 587–598.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., & McNulty, J. K. (2010). Body image and marital satisfaction: Evidence for the mediating role of sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(2), 156–164.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., & McNulty, J. K. (2019). Relationship formation and early romantic relationships. In Schoebi, D. & Campos, B. (Eds.), New directions in the psychology of close relationships: A brief introduction (pp. 9–27). Oxon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., Jackson, G. L., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 418–428.Google Scholar
Messman, S. J., Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (2000). Motives to remain platonic, equity, and the use of maintenance strategies in opposite-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 67–94.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P., & Swaddle, J. P. (1997). Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B., Kuhle, B. X., Wade, T. J., & Seid, M. A. (2017). To poach or not to poach? Men are more willing to short-term poach mated women who are more attractive than their mates. EvoS Journal: The Journal of Evolutionary Studies Consortium, 8, 58–69.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B., & Wade, T. J. (2019). Self-perceived success in mate poaching: How a couple’s attractiveness and relationship duration impact men’s short-term poaching intentions. Human Ethology, 34, 26–40.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B., & Wade, T. J. (2022). Perceptions of a mismatched couple: The role of attractiveness on mate poaching and copying. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 94–99. doi: 10.1037/ebs0000187Google Scholar
Morton, H., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2015). Role of partner novelty in sexual functioning: A review. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(6), 593–609.Google Scholar
Muise, A., Giang, E., & Impett, E. A. (2014). Post sex affectionate exchanges promote sexual and relationship satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(7), 1391–1402.Google Scholar
O’Donohue, W., & Plaud, J. J. (1991). The long-term habituation of sexual arousal in the human male. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 22(2), 87–96.Google Scholar
Oliver‐Rodríguez, J. C., Guan, Z., & Johnston, V. S. (1999). Gender differences in late positive components evoked by human faces. Psychophysiology, 36(2), 176–185.Google Scholar
Pazhoohi, F., Arantes, J., Kingstone, A., & Pinal, D. (2020). Waist to hip ratio and breast size modulate the processing of female body silhouettes: An EEG study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(2), 150–169.Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 1617–1623.Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(1), 39–48.Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399(6738), 741–742.Google Scholar
Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2009). Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies. PLoS One, 4(1), e4138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004138Google Scholar
Pietruski, P., Paskal, W., Paskal, A. M., Jaworowski, J., Paluch, L., & Noszczyk, B. (2019). Analysis of the visual perception of female breast aesthetics and symmetry: An eye-tracking study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 144(6), 1257–1266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pipitone, R. N., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2008). Women’s voice attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 268–274.Google Scholar
Pizzari, T., Cornwallis, C. K., Lovlie, H., Jakobssen, S., & Birkhead, T. R. (2003). Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature, 426, 70–74.Google Scholar
Platek, S. M., Burch, R. L., & Gallup, G. G. (2001). The reproductive priming effect. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29, 245–248.Google Scholar
Plaud, J. J., Gaither, G. A., Henderson, S. A., & Devitt, M. K. (1997). The long-term habituation of sexual arousal in human males: A crossover design. The Psychological Record, 47(3), 385–398.Google Scholar
Pond, C. M. (1978). Morphological aspects and the ecological and mechanical consequences of fat deposition in wild vertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 9, 519–570.Google Scholar
Probst, F., Bobst, C., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2016). Testosterone-to-oestradiol ratio is associated with female facial attractiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(1). doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1024696Google Scholar
Prokop, P., Zvaríková, M., Zvarík, M., & Fedor, P. (2020). Cues of pregnancy decrease female physical attractiveness for males. Current Psychology, 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12144–020-00608-4Google Scholar
Pruett-Jones, S. (1992). Independent versus nonindependent mate choice: Do females copy each other? American Naturalist, 140, 1000–1009.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 388–397.Google Scholar
Rätsch, C. (1997). Plants of love: Aphrodisiacs in myth, history, and the present. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G., Hickford, C., & Jeffery, L. (2000). Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? British Journal of Psychology, 91, 125–140.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 186–201.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Lee, K., McKay, R., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception, 30(5), 611–625.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Palermo, R., Simmons, L. W., Peters, M., Lee, K., … & Crawford, J. R. (2007). Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism. Perception, 36(8), 1244–1252.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A., & McKay, R. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. E., & Short, R. V. (1977). Changes in breast sensitivity at puberty, during the menstrual cycle, and at parturition. British Medical Journal, 1(6070), 1188–1191.Google Scholar
Rodeheffer, C. D., Proffitt Leyva, R. P., & Hill, S. E. (2016). Attractive female romantic partners provide a proxy for unobservable male qualities: The when and why behind human female mate choice copying. Evolutionary Psychology, 14(2). doi: 10.1177/1474704916652144Google Scholar
Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2012). Men smelling women: Null effects of exposure to ovulatory sweat on men’s testosterone. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(4). doi: 10.1177/147470491201000404Google Scholar
Samuels, C. A., Butterworth, G., Roberts, T., Graupner, L., & Hole, G. (1994). Facial aesthetics: Babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry. Perception, 23, 823–831.Google Scholar
Scheflen, A. E. (1965). Quasi-courtship behavior in psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 28(3), 245–257.Google Scholar
Schmalt, H. D. (2006). Waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness: The moderating role of power motivation and the mating context. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 455–465.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 894–917.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., & International Sexuality Description Project. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Jonason, P. K., Byerley, G. J., Flores, S. D., Illbeck, B. E., O’Leary, K. N., & Qudrat, A. (2012). A reexamination of sex differences in sexuality: New studies reveal old truths. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 135–139.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The desire for sexual variety as a key to understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships, 8(4), 425–455.Google Scholar
Schwarz, S., Klümper, L., & Hassebrauck, M. (2020). Are sex differences in mating preferences really “overrated”? The effects of sex and relationship orientation on long-term and short-term mate preferences. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 6(2), 174–187.Google Scholar
Scutt, D., & Manning, J. T. (1996). Ovary and ovulation: Symmetry and ovulation in women. Human Reproduction, 11(11), 2477–2480.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1999). Facial attractiveness and physical health. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(1), 71–76.Google Scholar
Sheets, V. L., Fredendall, L. L., & Claypool, H. M. (1997). Jealousy evocation, partner reassurance, and relationship stability: An exploration of the potential benefits of jealousy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 387–402.Google Scholar
Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 410–414.Google Scholar
Simmons, L. W., Firman, R. C., Rhodes, G., & Peters, M. (2004). Human sperm competition: Testis size, sperm production and rates of extrapair copulations. Animal Behaviour, 68(2), 297–302.Google Scholar
Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.Google Scholar
Singh, D. (2004). Mating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 43–54.Google Scholar
Singh, D., & Bronstad, P. M. (2001). Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268(1469), 797–801.Google Scholar
Singh, D., & Randall, P. K. (2007). Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: Waist-hip ratio (WHR) and women’s attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 329–340.Google Scholar
Singh, D., & Young, R. K. (1995). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breast, and hips: roles in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 483–507.Google Scholar
Spence, R., Reichard, M., & Smith, C. (2013). Strategic sperm allocation and a Coolidge effect in an externally fertilizing species. Behavioral Ecology, 24(1), 82–88.Google Scholar
Steiger, S., Franz, R., & Eggert, A.-K. (2008). The Coolidge effect, individual recognition and selection for distinctive cuticular signatures in a burying beetle. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 1831–1838.Google Scholar
Stelzer, C., Desmond, S. M., & Price, J. H. (1987). Physical attractiveness and sexual activity of college students. Psychological Reports, 60, 567–573.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. N., & Szymanski, D. M. (2012). Young adult women’s reports of their male romantic partner’s pornography use as a correlate of their self-esteem, relationship quality, and sexual satisfaction. Sex Roles, 67(5–6), 257–271.Google Scholar
Strock, J. M. (2003). Theodore Roosevelt on leadership: Executive lessons from the bully pulpit. New York, NY: Crown Forum.Google Scholar
Swami, V., Stieger, S., Haubner, T., Voracek, M., & Furnham, A. (2009). Evaluating the physical attractiveness of oneself and one’s romantic partner: Individual and relationship correlates of the love-is-blind bias. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(1), 35–43.Google Scholar
Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2013). Men’s oppressive beliefs predict their breast size preferences in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(7), 1199–1207.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In Abramson, P. R. and Pinkerton, S. D. (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. N., Hamm, M., Borrero, S., Hess, R., & Thurston, R. C. (2019). Body image, attractiveness, and sexual satisfaction among midlife women: A qualitative study. Journal of Women’s Health, 28(1), 100–106.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999a). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 452–460.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999b). The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(3), 175–201.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R., Scheyd, G., McCollough, J. K., & Franklin, M. (2003). Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14(5), 668–678.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biological Reviews, 72(4), 497–548.Google Scholar
Tiggemann, M., & McGill, B. (2004). The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 211–218.Google Scholar
Tovée, M. J., Reinhardt, S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1998). Optimal BMI and maximal sexual attractiveness. Lancet, 352, 548.Google Scholar
Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Mangalparsad, R. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(6), 443–456.Google Scholar
Tovée, M. J., Tasker, K., & Benson, P. J. (2000). Is symmetry a visual cue to attractiveness in the human female body? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(3), 191–200.Google Scholar
Træen, B., Holmen, K., & Stigum, H. (2007). Extradyadic sexual relationships in Norway. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
Tylka, T. L., & Kroon Van Diest, A. M. (2015). You looking at her “hot” body may not be “cool” for me: Integrating male partners’ pornography use into objectification theory for women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 67–84.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, S., Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2014). Social network sites, marriage well-being and divorce: Survey and state-level evidence from the United States. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 94–101.Google Scholar
Vatsyayana, (1994). The complete Kama Sutra: The first unabridged modern translation of the classic Indian text by Vatsyayana (Danielou, A., Trans.). Rochester, VT: Park Street Press.Google Scholar
Wade, T. J. (2010). The relationships between symmetry and attractiveness and mating relevant decisions and behavior: A review. Symmetry, 2(2), 1081–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, T. J., Auer, G., & Roth, T. M. (2009). What is love: Further investigation of love acts. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3(4), 290–304.Google Scholar
Wade, T. J., & Weinstein, A. B. (2011). Jealousy induction: Which tactics are perceived as most effective? Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 5(4), 231–238.Google Scholar
Wang, T. T., Wessels, L., Hussain, G., & Merten, S. (2017). Discriminative thresholds in facial asymmetry: A review of the literature. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 37(4), 375–385.Google Scholar
Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005). Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 635–653.Google Scholar
White, G. L. (1980). Inducing jealousy: A power perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(2), 222–227.Google Scholar
Yorzinski, J. L., & Platt, M. L. (2010). Same-sex gaze attraction influences mate-choice copying in humans. PLoS One, 5(2), e9115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009115Google Scholar
Zelazniewicz, A. M., & Pawlowski, B. (2011). Female breast size attractiveness for men as a function of sociosexual orientation (restricted vs. unrestricted). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1129–1135.Google Scholar

References

Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 939–954.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1978). The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(3), 436–438.Google Scholar
Alio, A. P., Kornosky, J. L., Mbah, A. K., Marty, P. J., & Salihu, H. M. (2010). The impact of paternal involvement on feto-infant morbidity among Whites, Blacks and Hispanics. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(5), 735–741.Google Scholar
Barbaro, N., Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017a). Genetic confounding of the relationship between father-absence and age at menarche. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 357–365.Google Scholar
Barbaro, N., Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017b). Rethinking the transmission gap: What behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology mean for attachment theory. A comment on Verhage et al. (2016). Psychological Bulletin, 143, 107–113.Google Scholar
Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2010). Humor in intimate relationships: Ties among sense of humor, similarity in humor and relationship quality. Humor, 23(4), 447–465.Google Scholar
Bazzini, D. G., & Shaffer, D. R. (1999). Resisting temptation revisited: Devaluation versus enhancement of an attractive suitor by exclusive and nonexclusive daters. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 162–176.Google Scholar
Betzig, L. (1989). Causes of conjugal dissolution: A cross-cultural study. Current Anthropology, 30(5), 654–676.Google Scholar
Bhugra, D. (2004). Literature review: A critical update. Sexual and Relationship Therapy: Journal of the British Association for Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 19(1), 109–115.Google Scholar
Birnie, C., McClure, J. M., Lydon, J. E., & Holmberg, D. (2009). Attachment avoidance and commitment aversion: A script for relationship failure. Personal Relationships, 16(1), 79–97.Google Scholar
Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 107–136.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1979). The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 637–638.Google Scholar
Bui, K.-V. T., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1996). Testing the Rusbult model of relationship commitment and stability in a 15-year study of heterosexual couples. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1244–1257.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2006). Strategies of human mating. Psychological Topics, 15(2), 239–260.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 559–570.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–256.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997a). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 346–361.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997b). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(2), 193–221.Google Scholar
Buunk, B. (1987). Conditions that promote breakups as a consequence of extradyadic involvements. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5(3), 271–284.Google Scholar
Cahill, V. A., Malouff, J. M., Little, C. W., & Schutte, N. S. (2020). Trait perspective taking and romantic relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(8), 1025–1035.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: an investment model analysis. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 484–495.Google Scholar
Cann, A., Davis, H. B., & Zapata, C. L. (2011). Humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: Perceived versus self-reported humor styles as predictors of satisfaction. Humor, 24(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Cate, R. M., & Lloyd, S. A. (1992). Courtship. Sage Series on Close Relationships, 142. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1992-98051-000.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cherlin, A. (1977). The effect of children on marital dissolution. Demography, 14(3), 265–272.Google Scholar
Conroy-Beam, D., Goetz, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). What predicts romantic relationship satisfaction and mate retention intensity: Mate preference fulfillment or mate value discrepancies? Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(6), 440–448.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. Handbook of Emotions, 2(2), 91–115.Google Scholar
Curry, O. S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Sharing a joke: The effects of a similar sense of humor on affiliation and altruism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 125–129.Google Scholar
Davies, S., Katz, J., & Jackson, J. L. (1999). Sexual desire discrepancies: Effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(6), 553–567.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (2016). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Goede, I. H. A., Branje, S., van Duin, J., VanderValk, I. E., & Meeus, W. (2012). Romantic relationship commitment and its linkages with commitment to parents and friends during adolescence. Social Development, 21(3), 425–442.Google Scholar
de Lenne, O., Wittevronghel, L., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2019). Romantic relationship commitment and the threat of alternatives on social media. Personal Relationships. doi: 10.1111/pere.12299Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Sex differences in attachment emerge in middle childhood: An evolutionary hypothesis. Child Development Perspectives, 4(2), 97–105.Google Scholar
DeWall, C. N., Lambert, N. M., Slotter, E. B., Pond, R. S., Deckman, T., Finkel, E. J., … & Fincham, F. D. (2011). So far away from one’s partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: Avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1302–1316.Google Scholar
Dobrowolska, M., Groyecka-Bernard, A., Sorokowski, P., Randall, A. K., Hilpert, P., Ahmadi, K., … & Sorokowska, A. (2020). Global perspective on marital satisfaction. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 12(21), 8817. doi: 10.3390/su12218817Google Scholar
Drigotas, S. M., Safstrom, C. A., & Gentilia, T. (1999). An investment model prediction of dating infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 509–524.Google Scholar
Duemmler, S. L., & Kobak, R. (2001). The development of commitment and attachment in dating relationships: Attachment security as relationship construct. Journal of Adolescence, 24(3), 401–415.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J. (1998). The partner‐specific investment inventory: An evolutionary approach to individual differences in investment. Journal of Personality, 66(3), 383–442.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J. (2004). Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: An integrated life history approach. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 920–958.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., Pettit, G. S., & Woodward, L. (2003). Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy? Child Development, 74(3), 801–821.Google Scholar
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., Wu, T.-F., & Wei, M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 546–567.Google Scholar
Flamson, T., & Barrett, H. C. (2008). The encryption theory of humor: A knowledge-based mechanism of honest signaling. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6(4), 261–281.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72–89.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. (2012). Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(25), 9923–9928.Google Scholar
Geissmann, T. (1999). Duet songs of the siamang, Hylobates syndactylus: II. Testing the pair-bonding hypothesis during a partner exchange. Behaviour, 136(8), 1005–1039.Google Scholar
Geissmann, T., & Orgeldinger, M. (2000). The relationship between duet songs and pair bonds in siamangs, Hylobates syndactylus. Animal Behaviour, 60(6), 805–809.Google Scholar
Gere, J., MacDonald, G., Joel, S., Spielmann, S. S., & Impett, E. A. (2013). The independent contributions of social reward and threat perceptions to romantic commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 961–977.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gil-Burmann, C., Peláez, F., & Sánchez, S. (2002). Mate choice differences according to sex and age. Human Nature, 13(4), 493–508.Google Scholar
Goetz, C. D., Pillsworth, E. G., Buss, D. M., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2019). Evolutionary mismatch in mating. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2709.Google Scholar
Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 34–48.Google Scholar
Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Love, desire, and the suppression of thoughts of romantic alternatives. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.Google Scholar
Goodfriend, W., & Agnew, C. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1639–1652.Google Scholar
Gwinn, A. M., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., & Maner, J. K. (2013). Pornography, relationship alternatives, and intimate extradyadic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 699–704.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A. (2013). Humor in long-term romantic relationships: The association of general humor styles and relationship-specific functions with relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication: WJSC, 77(3), 272–292.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2010). Culture, attachment style, and romantic relationships. Attachment: Expanding the Cultural Connections, 327, 227–242.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Singelis, T., Levine, T., Bachman, G., Muto, K., & Choo, P. (2007). Love schemas, preferences in romantic partners, and reactions to commitment. Interpersona, 1(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Hirschberger, G., Srivastava, S., Marsh, P., Cowan, C. P., & Cowan, P. A. (2009). Attachment, marital satisfaction, and divorce during the first fifteen years of parenthood. Personal Relationships, 16(3), 401–420.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Preface: Allomothers across species, across cultures, and through time. In Bentley, G. & Mace, R. (Eds.), Substitute parents: Biological and social perspectives on alloparenting in human societies (pp. xi–xviii). New York, NY: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Hurtado, A. M., & Hill, K. R. (1992). Paternal effect on offspring survivorship among Ache and Hiwi hunter-gatherers: Implications for modeling pair-bond stability. In Hewlett, B. S. (Ed.), Father-child relations: Cultural and biosocial contexts (pp. 31–55). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Impett, E. A., Beals, K. P., & Peplau, L. A. (2001). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20(4), 312–326.Google Scholar
Jemmott, J. B., Ashby, K. L., & Lindenfeld, K. (1989). Romantic commitment and the perceived availability of opposite-sex persons: On loving the one you’re with. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(14), 1198–1211.Google Scholar
Joel, S., Gordon, A. M., Impett, E. A., MacDonald, G., & Keltner, D. (2013). The things you do for me: Perceptions of a romantic partner’s investments promote gratitude and commitment. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(10), 1333–1345.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 967–980.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 502–512.Google Scholar
Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(4), 919–948.Google Scholar
Lacker, T. J., Walther, A., Waldvogel, P., & Ehlert, U. (2020). Fatherhood is associated with increased infidelity and moderates the link between relationship satisfaction and infidelity. Psych, 2(4), 370–384.Google Scholar
Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 37–57.Google Scholar
Leikas, S., Ilmarinen, V.-J., Verkasalo, M., Vartiainen, H.-L., & Lönnqvist, J.-E. (2018). Relationship satisfaction and similarity of personality traits, personal values, and attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 191–198.Google Scholar
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., & Hatfield, E. (2006). Passionate love: Cross-cultural and evolutionary perspectives. In Stenberg, R. J. & Weis, K. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 274–297). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, H. J., Wong, K.-C., & Chang, L. (2017). The association between life history strategy and mate preference in men. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 157–163.Google Scholar
Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.Google Scholar
Mark, K. P. (2012). The relative impact of individual sexual desire and couple desire discrepancy on satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 27(2), 133–146.Google Scholar
Mark, K. P., & Murray, S. H. (2012). Gender differences in desire discrepancy as a predictor of sexual and relationship satisfaction in a college sample of heterosexual romantic relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 38(2), 198–215.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51(1–3), 45–61.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. (2001). Male contribution to diet and female reproductive success among foragers. Current Anthropology, 42(5), 755–760.Google Scholar
Mattison, S. M., Scelza, B., & Blumenfield, T. (2014). Paternal investment and the positive effects of fathers among the matrilineal Mosuo of Southwest China. American Anthropologist, 116(3), 591–610.Google Scholar
Mattson, R. E., Franco-Watkins, A. M., & Cunningham, K. (2012). How do I regret thee? Let me count my alternatives: Regret and decision making in intimate relationships. Psychology, 3(09), 657–665.Google Scholar
McConnell, M., & Moss, E. (2011). Attachment across the life span: Factors that contribute to stability and change. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 11, 60–77.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Wenner, C. A., & Fisher, T. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 85–97.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., Jackson, G. L., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(3), 418–428.Google Scholar
Miller, G. F., & Todd, P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(5), 190–198.Google Scholar
Miller, R. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 758–766.Google Scholar
Monk, J. K., Vennum, A. V., Ogolsky, B. G., & Fincham, F. D. (2014). Commitment and sacrifice in emerging adult romantic relationships. Marriage & Family Review, 50(5), 416–434.Google Scholar
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. J., & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Attachment processes and commitment to romantic relationships. In Adams, J. M. & Jones, W. H. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 109–124). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. P., Lye, D. N., & Condran, G. A. (1988). Sons, daughters, and the risk of marital disruption. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 110–129.Google Scholar
Myddelton, D. R. (2007). They meant well: Government project disasters. Institute of Economic Affairs Monographs, Hobart Paper No. 160. London: Institute of Economic Affairs. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1021302Google Scholar
Oberzaucher, E., & Grammer, K. (2014). The case of Moulay Ismael—Fact or fancy? PLoS One, 9(2), e85292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085292Google Scholar
Onyishi, E. I., Sorokowski, P., & Sorokowska, A. (2012). Children and marital satisfaction in a non-Western sample: Having more children increases marital satisfaction among the Igbo people of Nigeria. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(6), 771–774.Google Scholar
Oriña, M. M., Collins, W. A., Simpson, J. A., Salvatore, J. E., Haydon, K. C., & Kim, J. S. (2011). Developmental and dyadic perspectives on commitment in adult romantic relationships. Psychological Science, 22(7), 908–915.Google Scholar
Pillsworth, E. G. (2008). Mate preferences among the Shuar of Ecuador: Trait rankings and peer evaluations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 256–267.Google Scholar
Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Women’s sexual strategies: The evolution of long-term bonds and extrapair sex. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17(1), 59–100.Google Scholar
Plutchik, R. E., & Conte, H. R. (Eds.). (1997). Circumplex models of personality and emotions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Priest, R. F., & Thein, M. T. (2003). Humor appreciation in marriage: Spousal similarity, assortative mating, and disaffection. Humor, 16(1), 63–78.Google Scholar
Quinlan, R. J. (2003). Father absence, parental care, and female reproductive development. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(6), 376–390.Google Scholar
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 543–550.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175–204.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Johnson, D. J., & Morrow, G. D. (1986). Predicting satisfaction and commitment in adult romantic involvements: An assessment of the generalizability of the investment model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49(1), 81–89.Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387.Google Scholar
Sabatelli, R. M., & Cecil-Pigo, E. F. (1985). Relational interdependence and commitment in marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 47(4), 931–937.Google Scholar
Scelza, B. A. (2010). Fathers’ presence speeds the social and reproductive careers of sons. Current Anthropology, 51(2), 295–303.Google Scholar
Scelza, B. A., Prall, S. P., Blumenfield, T., Crittenden, A. N., Gurven, M., Kline, M., … & McElreath, R. (2020). Patterns of paternal investment predict cross-cultural variation in jealous response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
Schacht, R., & Bell, A. V. (2016). The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity. Scientific Reports, 6, 32472. doi: 10.1038/srep32472Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2002). Personality, attachment and sexuality related to dating relationship outcomes: Contrasting three perspectives on personal attribute interaction. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(Pt 4), 589–610.Google Scholar
Schoen, R. (1975). California divorce rates by age at first marriage and duration of first marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 37(3), 548–555.Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Sear, R., Steele, F., McGregor, I. A., & Mace, R. (2002). The effects of kin on child mortality in rural Gambia. Demography, 39(1), 43–63.Google Scholar
Sened, H., Lavidor, M., Lazarus, G., Bar-Kalifa, E., Rafaeli, E., & Ickes, W. (2017). Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(6), 742–752.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K. (1998). Divorce as a consequence of spousal infidelity. In de Munck, V. C. (Ed.), Romantic love and sexual behavior (pp. 135–153). New York, NY: Praeger/Greenwood.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1997). Marital satisfaction in evolutionary psychological perspective. In Sternberg, J. & Hojjat, M. (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 7–25). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sheppard, P., & Sear, R. (2012). Father absence predicts age at sexual maturity and reproductive timing in British men. Biology Letters, 8(2), 237–240.Google Scholar
Simao, J., & Todd, P. M. (2002). Modeling mate choice in monogamous mating systems with courtship. Adaptive Behavior, 10(2), 113–136.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Gangestad, S. W., & Lerma, M. (1990). Perception of physical attractiveness: Mechanisms involved in the maintenance of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1192–1201.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2010). Attachment and relationships: Milestones and future directions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 173–180.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Cate, R. M. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In Harvey, J. H., Wenzel, A., & Sprecher, S. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235–256). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Whitton, S. W. (2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41(4), 659–675.Google Scholar
Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 27–44.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tennov, D. (1998). Love and limerence: The experience of being in love. New York, NY: Scarborough House.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (Eds.). (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. (1977). Children and marital stability. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 39(3), 531–540.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11(4), 375–424.Google Scholar
Tran, S., & Simpson, J. A. (2009). Pro-relationship maintenance behaviors: The joint roles of attachment and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 685–698.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2003). Parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65(3), 574–583.Google Scholar
Van Yperen, N. W., & Buunk, B. P. (1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), 287–309.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Sex in “his” versus “her” relationships. In Harvey, J. H. (Ed.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 455–474). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wade, M. J., & Shulter, S. M. (2004). Sexual selection: Harem size and the variance in male reproductive success. The American Naturalist, 164(4), E83–E89. doi: 10.1086/424531Google Scholar
Waite, L. J., & Lillard, L. A. (1991). Children and marital disruption. The American Journal of Sociology, 96(4), 930–953.Google Scholar
Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Webster, G. D., Graber, J. A., Gesselman, A. N., Crosier, B. S., & Schember, T. O. (2014). A life history theory of father absence and menarche: a meta-analysis. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2), 273–294.Google Scholar
Wroblewski, E. E., Murray, C. M., Keele, B. F., Schumacher-Stankey, J. C., Hahn, B. H., & Pusey, A. E. (2009). Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii. Animal Behaviour, 77(4), 873–885.Google Scholar
Yeh, H.-C., Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K. A. S., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2006). Relationships among sexual satisfaction, marital quality, and marital instability at midlife. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(2), 339–343.Google Scholar
Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R. D., & Gangamma, R. (2014). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(4), 275–293.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Maner, J. K., Xu, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Relational motives reduce attentional adhesion to attractive alternatives in heterosexual university students in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 503–511.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, K. G. (2006). How well does paternity confidence match actual paternity? Current Anthropology, 47, 513–520.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, G. F., Haselton, M. G., Thornhill, R., & Neale, M. C. (2008). Sex differences in detecting sexual infidelity: Results of a maximum likelihood method for analyzing the sensitivity of sex differences to underreporting. Human Nature, 19, 347–373.Google Scholar
Apostolou, M., Aristidou, A., & Eraclide, C. (2019). Reactions to and forgiveness of infidelity: Exploring severity, length of relationship, sex, and previous experience effects. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5, 317–330.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C., Frederick, D. A., Haselton, M. G., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Can manipulations of cognitive load be used to test evolutionary hypotheses? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 513–518.Google Scholar
Baschnagel, J. S., & Edlund, J. E. (2016). Affective modification of the startle eyeblink response during sexual and emotional infidelity scripts. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 114–122.Google Scholar
Bendixen, M., Kennair, L. E. O., Kaasa Ringheim, H., Isaksen, L., Pedersen, L., Svangtun, S., … & Hagen, K. (2015). In search of moderators of sex differences in forced-choice sexual jealousy responses: Effects of 2D:4D digit ratio and relationship infidelity experiences. Nordic Psychology, 67, 272–284.Google Scholar
Bendixen, M., Kennair, L. E. O., & Grøntvedt, T. V. (2018). Forgiving the unforgivable: Couples’ forgiveness and expected forgiveness of emotional and sexual infidelity from an error management theory perspective. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 322–335.Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2004). Gender differences in rival characteristics that evoke jealousy in response to emotional versus sexual infidelity. Personal Relationships, 11, 395–408.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Massar, K., & Dijkstra, P. (2007). A social cognitive evolutionary approach to jealousy: The automatic evaluation of one’s romantic rivals. In Forgas, J., Haselton, M., & Von Hippel, W. (Eds.). Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition. (pp. 213–228). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2013). Sexual jealousy. Psychological Topics, 22, 155–182.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2018). Sexual and emotional infidelity: Evolved gender differences in jealousy prove robust and replicable. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 155–160.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (6th ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2011). The evolution of intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 411–419.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Durkee, P. K., Shackelford, T. K., Bowdle, B. F., Schmitt, D. P., Brase, G. L., … & Trofimova, I. (2020). Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 979–998.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110.Google Scholar
Cann, A., & Baucom, T. R. (2004). Former partners and new rivals as threats to a relationship: Infidelity type, gender, and commitment as factors related to distress and forgiveness. Personal Relationships, 11, 305–318.Google Scholar
Carpenter, C. J. (2012). Meta-analyses of sex differences in responses to sexual versus emotional infidelity: Men and women are more similar than different. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 25–37.Google Scholar
DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Braverman, J., & Salovey, P. (2002). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1103–1116.Google Scholar
DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., & Salovey, P. (2006). Constraining accommodative homunculi in evolutionary explorations of jealousy: A reply to Barrett et al. (2006). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 519–523.Google Scholar
DeSteno, D. A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Genes, jealousy, and the replication of misspecified models. Psychological Science, 7, 376–379.Google Scholar
Easton, J. A., Schipper, L. D., & Shackelford, T. K. (2007). Morbid jealousy from an evolutionary psychological perspective. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 399–402.Google Scholar
Easton, J. A., & Shackelford, T. K. (2009). Morbid jealousy and sex differences in partner-directed violence. Human Nature, 20, 342–350.Google Scholar
Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2017). Sex differences in jealousy: A 25-year retrospective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 259–302.Google Scholar
Frederick, D. A., & Fales, M. R. (2016). Upset over sexual versus emotional infidelity among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 175–191.Google Scholar
Fussell, N. J., Rowe, A. C., & Park, J. H. (2011). Masculinised brain and romantic jealousy: Examining the association between digit ratio (2D:4D) and between- and within-sex differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 107–111.Google Scholar
Geary, D. C., DeSoto, M. C., Hoard, M. K., Sheldon, M. S., & Cooper, M. L. (2001). Estrogens and relationship jealousy. Human Nature, 12, 299–320.Google Scholar
Grice, J. W., & Seely, E. (2000). The evolution of sex differences in jealousy: Failure to replicate previous results. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 348–356.Google Scholar
Hamann, S., Herman, R. A., Nolan, C. L., & Wallen, K. (2004). Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 411–416.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. (2000). Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: The specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1082–1091.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. (2003a). A review of sex differences in sexual jealousy, including self-report data, psychophysiological responses, interpersonal violence, and morbid jealousy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 102–128.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. (2003b). Factors associated with jealousy over real and imagined infidelity: An examination of the social-cognitive and evolutionary psychology perspectives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 319–329.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. (2005). Male and female jealousy, still more similar than different: Reply to Sagarin (2005). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 76–86.Google Scholar
Kato, T. (2014a). A reconsideration of sex differences in response to sexual and emotional infidelity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1281–1288.Google Scholar
Kato, T. (2014b). Testing the sexual imagination hypothesis for gender differences in response to infidelity. BMC Research Notes, 7, 860. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-860Google Scholar
Kato, T. (2017). A review of sex differences and similarities in responses to infidelity: A meta-analytic examination. Behavioral Science Research, 55, 137–149. Sporting information: KL2016–001. Retrieved from http://katolabo.web.fc2.com/KL2016-001.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kato, T. (2021a). Gender differences in response to infidelity types and rival attractiveness. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 36, 368–384.Google Scholar
Kato, T. (2021b). Effect of relationship status on response times to sexual and romantic stimuli among Japanese undergraduates in a memory task. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02149-8Google Scholar
Kuhle, B. X. (2011). Did you have sex with him? Do you love her? An in vivo test of sex differences in jealous interrogations. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 1044–1047.Google Scholar
Kuhle, B. X., Smedley, K. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). Sex differences in the motivation and mitigation of jealousy-induced interrogations. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 499–502.Google Scholar
Mogilski, J. K., Reeve, S. D., Nicolas, S. C. A., Donaldson, S. H., Mitchell, V. E., & Welling, L. L. M. (2019). Jealousy, consent, and compersion within monogamous and consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 1811–1828.Google Scholar
Parrott, W. G. (1991). The emotional experiences of envy and jealousy. In Salovey, P. (Ed.), The psychology of jealousy and envy (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993-2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38.Google Scholar
Pietrzak, R. H., Laird, J. D., Stevens, D. A., & Thompson, N. S. (2002). Sex differences in human jealousy: A coordinated study of forced-choice, continuous rating-scale, and physiological responses on the same subjects. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 83–94.Google Scholar
Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 206–218.Google Scholar
Sagarin, B. J. (2005). Reconsidering evolved sex differences in jealousy: Comment on Harris (2003). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 62–75.Google Scholar
Sagarin, B. J., Becker, D. V., Guadagno, R. E., Wilkinson, W. W., & Nicastle, L. D. (2012). A reproductive threat-based model of evolved sex differences in jealousy. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 487–503.Google Scholar
Sagarin, B. J., Martin, A. L., Coutinho, S. A., Edlund, J. E., Patel, L., Skowronski, J. J., & Zengel, B. (2012). Sex differences in jealousy: A meta-analytic examination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 595–614.Google Scholar
Scelza, B. A., Prall, S. P., Blumenfield, T., Crittenden, A. N., Gurven, M., Kline, M., … & McElreath, R. (2020). Patterns of paternal investment predict cross-cultural variation in jealous response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 20–26.Google Scholar
Schützwohl, A. (2004). Which infidelity type makes you more jealous? Decision strategies in a forced-choice between sexual and emotional infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 121–128.Google Scholar
Schützwohl, A. (2005). Sex differences in jealousy: The processing of cues to infidelity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 288–299.Google Scholar
Schützwohl, A. (2006). Sex differences in jealousy: Information search and cognitive preoccupation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 285–292.Google Scholar
Schützwohl, A. (2008). The crux of cognitive load: Constraining deliberate and effortful decision processes in romantic jealousy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 127–132.Google Scholar
Schützwohl, A., & Koch, S. (2004). Sex differences in jealousy: The recall of cues to sexual and emotional infidelity in personally more and less threatening context conditions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 249–257.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., Buss, D. M., & Bennett, K. (2002). Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner’s infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 299–307.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tafoya, M. A., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2007). The dark side of infidelity: Its nature, prevalence, and communicative functions. In Spitzberg, B. H & Cupach, W. R (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 201–242). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Takahashi, H., Matsuura, M., Yahata, N., Koeda, M., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2006). Men and women show distinct brain activations during imagery of sexual and emotional infidelity. NeuroImage, 32, 1299–1307.Google Scholar
Valentova, J. V., de Moraes, A. C., & Varella, M. A. C. (2020). Gender, sexual orientation and type of relationship influence individual differences in jealousy: A large Brazilian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109805. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109805Google Scholar
Wade, T. J., & Fowler, K. (2006). Sex differences in responses to sexual and emotional infidelity: Considerations of rival attractiveness and financial status. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 37–50.Google Scholar
Walter, K. V., Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Asao, K., Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., … & Zupančič, M. (2020). Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: A large-scale replication. Psychological Science, 31, 408–423.Google Scholar
Walum, H., Larsson, H., Westberg, L., Lichtenstein, P., & Magnusson, P. K. (2013). Sex differences in jealousy: A population-based twin study in Sweden. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 941–947.Google Scholar

References

Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), 830–838.Google Scholar
Acevedo, B. P., & Aron, A. P. (2014). Romantic love, pair-bonding, and the dopaminergic reward system. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 55–70). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. G. & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self‐reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 27–35.Google Scholar
Allen, E. S., & Baucom, D. H. (2004). Adult attachment and patterns of extradyadic involvement. Family Process, 43(4), 467–488.Google Scholar
Balzarini, R. N., Muise, A., Dobson, K., Kohut, T., Raposo, S., & Campbell, L. (2021). The detriments of unmet sexual ideals and buffering effect of sexual responsiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000323Google Scholar
Basson, R. (2001). Using a different model for female sexual response to address women’s problematic low sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27(5), 395–403.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 347–374.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslavsky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(1), 49–67.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 5(3), 242–273.Google Scholar
Beck, J. G., Bozman, A. W., & Qualtrough, T. (1991). The experience of sexual desire: Psychological correlates in a college sample. Journal of Sex Research, 28(3), 443–456.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62(4), 647–670.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1988). Some comments on love’s anatomy: Or, whatever happened to old-fashioned lust? In Sternberg, R. J. & Barnes, M. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 359–374). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 193–281). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E. (2007). Beyond the borders of reality: Attachment orientations and sexual fantasies. Personal Relationships, 14(2), 321–342.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E. (2016). Attachment and sexual mating: The joint operation of separate motivational systems. In Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment, third edition: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 464–483). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E. (2018). The fragile spell of desire: A functional perspective on changes in sexual desire across relationship development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(2), 101–127.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., Ein-Dor, T., Reis, H. T., & Segal, N. (2014). Why do men prefer nice women? Gender typicality mediates the effect of responsiveness on perceived attractiveness in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(10), 1341–1353.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., & Finkel, E. J. (2015). The magnetism that holds us together: Sexuality and relationship maintenance across relationship development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 29–33.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., & Gillath, O. (2006). Measuring subgoals of the sexual behavioral system: What is sex good for? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 675–701.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G., Hirschberger, G., & Goldenberg, J. (2011). Desire in the face of death: Terror management, attachment, and sexual motivation. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., & Laser-Brandt, D. (2002). Gender differences in the experience of heterosexual intercourse. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11(3–4), 143–158.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., & Reis, H. T. (2006). Women’s sexual working models: An evolutionary-attachment perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 43(4), 328–342.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., & Reis, H. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 946–958.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Orpaz, A. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 929–943.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., Reis, H. T., Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Sass, O., & Granovski-Milner, C. (2016). Intimately connected: The importance of partner responsiveness for experiencing sexual desire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 530–546.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E., Weisberg, Y. J., & Simpson, J. A. (2011). Desire under attack: Attachment orientations and the effects of relationship threat on sexual motivations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(4), 448–468.Google Scholar
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F., & Brotto, L. A. (2014). Object of desire self-consciousness theory. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(4), 323–338.Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F., & Sadava, S. (2002). Adult attachment and sexual behavior. Personal Relationships, 9(2), 191–204.Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F., Visser, B. A., & Pozzebon, J. A. (2015). Gender differences in object of desire self-consciousness sexual fantasies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8), 2299–2310.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1982/1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brassard, A., Shaver, P. R., & Lussier, Y. (2007). Attachment, sexual experience, and sexual pressure in romantic relationships: A dyadic approach. Personal Relationships, 14(3), 475–494.Google Scholar
Brotto, L. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in men. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(6), 2015–2030.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 982–1026). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232.Google Scholar
Byers, E. S., & Heinlein, L. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26(2), 210–231.Google Scholar
Carothers, B. J., & Reis, H. T. (2013). Men and women are from Earth: Examining the latent structure of gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 385–407.Google Scholar
Carter, C. S., Ahnert, L., Grossmann, K. E., Hrdy, S. B., Lamb, M. E., Porges, S. W., & Sachser, N. (2005). Attachment and bonding: A new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child’s ties. In Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15(11), 736–44.Google Scholar
Clark, R. D. (1990). The impact of AIDS on gender differences in willingness to engage in casual sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 771–782.Google Scholar
Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2(1), 39–55.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. L., Pioli, M., Levitt, A., Talley, A., Micheas, L., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Attachment styles, sex motives, and sexual behavior: Evidence for gender specific expressions of attachment dynamics. In Mikulincer, M. & Goodman, G. S. (Eds.), Dynamics of love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex (pp. 243–274). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Conley, T. D. (2011). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 309–329.Google Scholar
Davies, S., Katz, J., & Jackson, J. L. (1999). Sexual desire discrepancies: Effects on sexual and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual dating couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(6), 553–567.Google Scholar
Davis, D. (2006). Attachment-related pathways to sexual coercion. In Mikulincer, M. & Goodman, G. (Eds.), Dynamics of romantic love (pp. 293–336). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Day, L. C., Muise, A., Joel, S., & Impett, E. A. (2015). To do it or not to do it? How communally motivated people navigate sexual interdependence dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(6), 791–804.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(1), 1–67.Google Scholar
Denes, A., Dhillon, A., & Speer, A. C. (2017). Relational maintenance strategies during the post sex time interval. Communication Quarterly, 65(3), 307–332.Google Scholar
Denney, N. W., Field, J. K., & Quadagno, D. (1984). Sex differences in sexual needs and desires. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13(3), 233–245.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110(1), 173–192.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. M. (2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(3), 116–119.Google Scholar
Ditzen, B., Schaer, M., Gabriel, B., Bodenmann, G., Ehlert, U., & Heinrichs, M. (2009). Intranasal oxytocin increases positive communication and reduces cortisol levels during couple conflict. Biological Psychiatry, 65(9), 728–731.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W. (2009). Beyond the Pleistocene: Using phylogeny and constraint to inform the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 794–821.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). The attachment system in fledgling relationships: An activating role for attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 628–647.Google Scholar
Eastwick, P. W., Keneski, E., Morgan, T. A., McDonald, M. A., & Huang, S. A. (2018). What do short-term and long-term relationships look like? Building the relationship coordination and strategic timing (ReCAST) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(5), 747–781.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., & Symons, D. (1990). Sex differences in sexual fantasy: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Sex Research, 27(4), 527–555.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. E. (1998). Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature, 9(1), 23–52.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding, romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of Homo sapiens. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 20–36.Google Scholar
Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Garcia, J. R., Gesselman, A. N., Massey, S. G., Seibold-Simpson, S., & Merriwether, A. M. (2018). Intimacy through casual sex: Relational context of sexual activity and affectionate behaviors. Journal of Relationships Research, 9, E12. doi: 10.1017/jrr.2018.10Google Scholar
Gentzler, A. L., & Kerns, K. A. (2004). Associations between insecure attachment and sexual experiences. Personal Relationships, 11(2), 249–265.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91.Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9(4), 383–410.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., & Zeifman, D. (1994). Sex and psychological tether. In Bartholomew, K & Perlman, D (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: Vol. 5. Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 151–177). Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Hite, S. (1976). The Hite report: A nationwide study of female sexuality. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hite, S. (1978). The Hite report on male sexuality. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Hughes, S. M., & Kruger, D. J. (2011). Sex differences in post-coital behaviors in long- and short-term mating: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 48(5), 496–505.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S., & Oliver, M. B. (2000). Gender differences in sexuality: Results from meta-analysis. In Travis, C. B & White, J. W (Eds.), Psychology of women: 4. Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 57–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kiefer, A. K., & Sanchez, D. T. (2007). Scripting sexual passivity: A gender role perspective. Personal Relationships, 14(2), 269–290.Google Scholar
Kim, J. J., Muise, A., Sakaluk, J. K., Rosen, N. O., & Impett, E. A. (2020). When tonight is not the night: Sexual rejection behaviors and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(10), 1476–1490.Google Scholar
Klusmann, D. (2002). Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(3), 275–287.Google Scholar
Knoth, R., Boyd, K., & Singer, B. (1988). Empirical tests of sexual selection theory: Predictions of sex differences in onset, intensity, and time course of sexual arousal. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 73–89.Google Scholar
Kruger, D. J., & Hughes, S. (2010). Variation in reproductive strategies influences post-coital experiences with partners. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4(4), 254–264.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Goldenberg, J. L., Greenberg, J., Gillath, O., Solomon, S., Cox, C., & Pyszczynski, T. (2006). The siren’s call: Terror management and the threat of men’s sexual attraction to women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 129–146.Google Scholar
van Lankveld, J., Jacobs, N., Thewissen, V., Dewitte, M., & Verboon, P. (2018). The associations of intimacy and sexuality in daily life: Temporal dynamics and gender effects within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(4), 557–576.Google Scholar
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 469–496.Google Scholar
Lemay, E. P., & Wolf, N. R. (2016). Projection of romantic and sexual desire in opposite-sex friendships: How wishful thinking creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(7), 864–878.Google Scholar
Mark, K. P. (2012). The relative impact of individual sexual desire and couple desire discrepancy on satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 27(2), 133–146.Google Scholar
Mark, K. P. (2014). The impact of daily sexual desire and daily sexual desire discrepancy on the quality of the sexual experience in couples. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(1), 27–33.Google Scholar
Mark, K. P., & Murray, S. H. (2012). Gender differences in desire discrepancy as a predictor of sexual and relationship satisfaction in a college sample of heterosexual romantic relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 38(2), 198–215.Google Scholar
Masters, T. N., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M. (2013). Sexual scripts among young heterosexually active men and women: Continuity and change. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 409–420.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. P. (1987). Desired and experienced levels of premarital affection and sexual intercourse during dating. Journal of Sex Research, 23(1), 23–33.Google Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Maxwell, J. A., Meltzer, A. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2019). Sex-differentiated changes in sexual desire predict marital dissatisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(8), 2473–2489.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. L., McNulty, J. K., & Maner, J. K. (2017). Women like being valued for sex, as long as it is by a committed partner. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 475–488.Google Scholar
Ménard, A. D., Kleinplatz, P. J., Rosen, L., Lawless, S., Paradis, N., Campbell, M., & Huber, J. D. (2015). Individual and relational contributors to optimal sexual experiences in older men and women. Sexual and Relationships Therapy, 30(1), 78–93.Google Scholar
Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 477–507.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Adult attachment and affect regulation. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 503–531). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Attachment theory expanded: A behavioral systems approach. In Deaux, K. & Snyder, M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 467–492). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36(4), 361–368.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A., & Byers, E. S. (2004). Actual and desired duration of foreplay and intercourse: Discordance and misperceptions within heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 41(3), 301–309.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. R., Wellings, K. A., & Graham, C. (2014). How do men and women define sexual desire and sexual arousal? Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(1), 17–32.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, M., Hirschberger, G., Mikulincer, M., Szepsenwol, O., & Birnbaum, G. E. (2016). Reassuring sex: Can sexual desire and intimacy reduce relationship‐specific attachment insecurities? European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 467–480.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, M., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Birnbaum, G. E. (2018). You haven’t been on my mind lately: Partner responsiveness mediates the link between attachment insecurity and sexual fantasies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(4), 440–459.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, M., Reis, H. T., Maniaci, M. R., & Birnbaum, G. E. (2019). When insecurity dampens desire: Attachment anxiety in men amplifies the decline in sexual desire during the early years of romantic relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1223–1236.Google Scholar
Muise, A., Giang, E., & Impett, E. A. (2014). Post sex affectionate exchanges promote sexual and relationship satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(7), 1391–1402.Google Scholar
Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2015). Good, giving, and game: The relationship benefits of communal sexual motivation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(2), 164–172.Google Scholar
Muise, A., Impett, E. A., Kogan, A., & Desmarias, S. (2013). Keeping the spark alive: Being motivated to meet a partners’ sexual needs sustains sexual desire in long-term romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 267–273.Google Scholar
Muise, A., Stanton, S. C. E., Kim, J. J., & Impett, E. A. (2016). Not in the mood? Men under- (not over-) perceive their partner’s sexual desire in established intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(5), 725–742.Google Scholar
Murnen, S. K., & Stockton, M. (1997). Gender and self-reported sexual arousal in response to sexual stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 37(3–4), 135–153.Google Scholar
Murray, S. H. (2018). Heterosexual men’s sexual desire: Supported by, or deviating from, traditional masculinity norms and sexual scripts? Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 78(1–2), 130–141.Google Scholar
Murray, S., & Milhausen, R. (2012). Factors impacting women’s sexual desire: Examining long-term relationships in emerging adulthood. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 21(2), 101–115.Google Scholar
Murray, S. H., Milhausen, R. R., Graham, C., & Kuczynski, L. (2017). A qualitative exploration of factors that affect sexual desire among men aged 30 to 65 in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 54(3), 319–330.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 29–51.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, L., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 29(3), 435–446.Google Scholar
Raposo, S., Impett, E. A., & Muise, A. (2020). Avoidantly attached individuals are more exchange-oriented and less communal in the bedroom. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(8), 2863–2881.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T. (2014). Responsiveness: Affective interdependence in close relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 255–271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., & Clark, M. S. (2013). Responsiveness. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 400–423). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., & Mizrahi, M. (2018). Whither relationship science? The state of the science and an agenda for moving forward. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 553–564). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Righetti, F., Balliet, D., Molho, C., Columbus, S., Faure, R., Bahar, Y., … & Arriaga, X. (2020). Fostering attachment security: The role of interdependent situations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207648Google Scholar
Rosen, N. O., Bailey, K., & Muise, A. (2018). Degree and direction of sexual desire discrepancy are linked to sexual and relationship satisfaction in couples transitioning to parenthood. Journal of Sex Research, 55(2), 214–225.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. C., Heiman, J. R., Long, J. S., Fisher, W. A., & Sand, M. S. (2016). Men with sexual problems and their partners: Findings from the international survey of relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 159–173.Google Scholar
Rubin, H., & Campbell, L. (2012). Day-to-day changes in intimacy predict heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: A dyadic diary analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 224–231.Google Scholar
Sakaluk, J. K., & Milhausen, R. R. (2012) Factors influencing university students’ explicit and implicit sexual double standards. Journal of Sex Research, 49(5), 464–476.Google Scholar
Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 168–183.Google Scholar
Seal, D. W., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5, 295–319.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., LaMunyon, C. W., Quintus, B. J., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2004). Sex differences in sexual psychology produce sex-similar preferences for a short-term mate. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(4), 405–412.Google Scholar
Shaver, P., Hazan, C., & Bradshaw, D. (1988). Love as attachment. In Sternberg, R. J. & Barnes, M. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 68–99). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (2003). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and change. Qualitative Sociology, 26(4), 491–497.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S. (2013). Attachment style and sexual permissiveness: The moderating role of gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(4), 428–432.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., Barbee, A., & Schwartz, P. (1995). “Was it good for you, too?”: Gender differences in first sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 32(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (1998). Passionate and companionate love in courting and young married couples. Sociological Inquiry, 68(2), 163–185.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A., & Waters, E. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 48(4), 1184–1199.Google Scholar
Štulhofer, A., Carvalheira, A. A., & Træen, B. (2013). Is responsive sexual desire for partnered sex problematic among men? Insights from a two-country study. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 28(3), 246–258.Google Scholar
Štulhofer, A., Jurin, T., Graham, C., Janssen, E., & Træen, B. (2020). Emotional intimacy and sexual well-being in aging European couples: A cross-cultural mediation analysis. European Journal of Ageing, 17, 43–54.Google Scholar
Szymanski, D. M., & Stewart-Richardson, D. N. (2014). Psychological, relational, and sexual correlates of pornography use on young adult heterosexual men in romantic relationships. Journal of Men’s Studies, 22(1), 64–82.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1996). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Houck, L. D & Drickamer, L. C (Eds.), Foundations of animal behavior: Classic papers with commentaries (pp. 795–838). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted from Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971, 1972, pp. 136–179. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2010). Sex without desire: Characteristics of occasions of sexual compliance in young adults’ committed relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 47(5), 429–439.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). Sex in “his” versus “her” relationships. In Harvey, J. H., Wenzel, A., & Sprecher, S. (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 455–474). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal, 13(4), 496–502.Google Scholar
Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair-bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.Google Scholar
Zeifman, D., & Hazan, C. (2008). Pair bonds as attachments: Reevaluating the evidence. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 436–455). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

References

Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.Google Scholar
Barta, Z., Székely, T., Liker, A., & Harrison, F. (2014). Social role specialization promotes cooperation between parents. The American Naturalist, 183, 747–761.Google Scholar
Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.Google Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Rauch, K. L. (2009). Sexual conflict in humans: Variations and solutions. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18, 201–214.Google Scholar
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Schacht, R. (2012). Human behavioural ecology. In The encyclopedia of life sciences. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0003671.pub2Google Scholar
Bribiescas, R. G., Ellison, P. T., & Gray, P. B. (2012). Male life history, reproductive effort, and the evolution of the genus Homo: New directions and perspectives. Current Anthropology, 53, S424–S435.Google Scholar
Brotherton, P. N., & Komers, P. E. (2003). Mate guarding and the evolution of social monogamy in mammals. In Reichard, R., Ulrich, H, & Boesch, C. (Eds.), Monogamy: Mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals (pp. 42–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryden, M. M. (1972). Growth and development of marine mammals. In Harrison, R. J. (Ed.), Functional anatomy of marine animals (pp. 1–79). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Charnov, E. L. (1993). Life history invariants: Some explorations of symmetry in evolutionary ecology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cockburn, A. (2006). Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1375–1383.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (1st ed., Vol. 1). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1976). Some aspects of research design and their implications in the observational study of behavior. Behaviour, 58, 58–78.Google Scholar
Flinn, M. V., Ward, C. V., & Noone, R. (2005). Hormones and the human family. In Buss, D. (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fouts, H. N. (2008). Father involvement with young children among the Aka and Bofi foragers. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 290–312.Google Scholar
Fromhage, L., Elgar, M. A., & Schneider, J. M. (2005). Faithful without care: The evolution of monogyny. Evolution, 59, 1400–1405.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S. (2012). Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 9923–9928.Google Scholar
Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., & Feranil, A. B. (2011). Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 27, 16194–16199.Google Scholar
Grafen, A., & Sibly, R. (1978). A model of mate desertion. Animal Behavior, 26, 645–652.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B. (2011). The descent of a man’s testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 108 , 16141–16142.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B., & Anderson, K. G. (2010). Fatherhood: Evolution and human paternal behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, P. B., & Brown, E. (2015). Fatherhood in St. Kitts: Patterns and predictors of partnership and paternal dynamics in a Caribbean island. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research & Practice about Men as Fathers, 13(1), 18–35.Google Scholar
Griffin, P. B., & Griffin, M. B. (1992). Fathers and childcare among the Cagayan Agta. In Hewlett, B. S (Ed.), Father-child relations: Cultural and biosocial contexts (pp. 297–320). Foundations of Human Behavior. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gurven, M., & Hill, K. (2009). Why do men hunt? A reevaluation of “man the hunter” and the sexual division of labor. Current Anthropology, 50, 51–74.Google Scholar
Harcourt, A. H., & Stewart, K. J. (2008). Gorilla society: Conflict, compromise, and cooperation between the sexes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. F., & Coxworth, J. E. (2010). Family provisioning is not the only reason men hunt: A comment on Gurven and Hill. Current Anthropology, 51, 259–264.Google Scholar
Hawkes, K., Rogers, A. R., & Charnov, E. L. (1995). The male’s dilemma: Increased offspring production is more paternity to steal. Evolutionary Ecology, 9, 662–677.Google Scholar
Hedges, S., Mulder, M. B., James, S., & Lawson, D. W. (2016). Sending children to school: rural livelihoods and parental investment in education in northern Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 142–151.Google Scholar
Hewlett, B. (1988). Sexual selection and paternal investment among Aka pygmies. In Betzig, L, Borgerhoff Mulder, M, & Turke, P (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior: A Darwinian perspective (pp. 263–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hewlett, B. S. (1993). Intimate fathers: The nature and context of Aka pygmy paternal infant care. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hewlett, B., & Macfarlan, S. (2010). Fathers’ roles in hunter-gatherer and other small-scale cultures. In Lamb, M. E (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 413–434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hill, K. (1993). Life history theory and evolutionary anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2, 78–88.Google Scholar
Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hill, K., & Kaplan, H. (1988). Tradeoffs in male and female reproductive strategies among the Ache: Part 1. In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Turke, P. (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior (pp. 277–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Høeg, B. L., Appel, C. W., von Heymann-Horan, A. B., Frederiksen, K., Johansen, C., Bøge, P., … & Bidstrup, P. E. (2017). Maladaptive coping in adults who have experienced early parental loss and grief counseling. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(14), 1851–1861.Google Scholar
Houston, A. I., Székely, T., & McNamara, J. M. (2005). Conflict between parents over care. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 33–38.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jenni, D. A., & Collier, G. (1972). Polyandry in the American jacana (Jacana spinosa). The Auk: Ornithological Advances, 89, 743–765.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–185.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H. S., & Lancaster, J. B. (2003). An evolutionary and ecological analysis of human fertility, mating patterns, and parental investment. In Offspring: Human fertility behavior in biodemographic perspective (pp. 170–223). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 502–512.Google Scholar
Kleiman, D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 39–69.Google Scholar
Kleiman, D. G., & Malcolm, J. R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In Gubernick, D. J & Klopfer, P. H. (Eds.), Parental care in mammals. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. L. (2009). Does it take a family to raise a child? Cooperative breeding and the contributions of Maya siblings, parents and older adults in raising children. In Bentley, G & Mace, R (Eds.), Substitute parents: Biological and social perspectives on alloparenting in human societies (1st ed., pp. 77–99). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 417–436.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. L., & Russell, A. F. (2015). Was monogamy a key step on the Hominin road? Reevaluating the monogamy hypothesis in the evolution of cooperative breeding. Evolutionary Anthropology, 24, 73–83.Google Scholar
Lamb, M. E. (2004). The role of the father in child development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L., & Levine, J. A. (1985). Paternal behavior in humans. American Zoologist, 25(3), 883–894.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. B., & Lancaster, C. S. (1987). The watershed: Change in parental-investment and family-formation strategies in the course of human evolution. In Lancaster, J. B, Altmann, J, Rossi, A. S, & Sherrod, L. R (Eds.), Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 187–205). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
Leonetti, D. L., & Chabot-Hanowell, B. (2011). The foundation of kinship. Human Nature, 22(1), 16–40.Google Scholar
Lessells, C. (1999). Sexual conflict. In Keller, L. (Ed.), Levels of selection in evolution (pp. 75–99). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, C. O. (1981). The origin of man. Science, 211, 341–350.Google Scholar
Lukas, D., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2013). The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science, 341, 526–530.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. (2000). Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes, 51, 45–61.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Hunting and gathering: The human sexual division of foraging labor. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 170–195.Google Scholar
Mathews, L. M. (2003). Tests of the mate-guarding hypothesis for social monogamy: Male snapping shrimp prefer to associate with high-value females. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 63–67.Google Scholar
McCann, T. S. (1981). Aggression and sexual activity of male southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina. Journal of Zoology, 195(3), 295–310.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. M., & Wolf, M. (2015). Sexual conflict over parental care promotes the evolution of sex differences in care and the ability to care. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20142752. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2752Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P., & Provost, C. (1973). Factors in the division of labor by sex: A cross-cultural analysis. Ethnology, 12, 203–225.Google Scholar
Perrone, M., & Zaret, T. M. (1979). Parental care patterns of fishes. The American Naturalist, 113, 351–361.Google Scholar
Pleck, J. H. (1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In Lamb, M. E (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 66–103). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, K. (1931). The Netsilik Eskimos: Social life and spiritual culture. Norwalk, CT: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. D., Goodwin, N. B., & Freckleton, R. P. (2002). Evolutionary transitions in parental care and live bearing in vertebrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 357, 269–281.Google Scholar
Ross, C. T., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Winterhalder, B., Uehara, R., Headland, J., & Headland, T. (2016). Evidence for quantity–quality trade-offs, sex-specific parental investment, and variance compensation in colonized Agta foragers undergoing demographic transition. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 350–365.Google Scholar
Royle, N. J., Smiseth, P. T., & Kölliker, M. (Eds.). (2012). The evolution of parental care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, A. F., & Lummaa, V. (2009). Maternal effects in cooperative breeders: From hymenopterans to humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1143–1167.Google Scholar
Schacht, R., & Bell, A. V. (2016). The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity. Nature Scientific Reports, 6, 32472. doi: 10.1038/srep32472Google Scholar
Schacht, R., & Kramer, K. L. (2019). Are we monogamous? A review of the evolution of pair-bonding in humans and its contemporary variation cross-culturally. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
Sear, R. (2021). The male breadwinner nuclear family is not the “traditional” human family, and promotion of this myth may have adverse health consequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1827): 20200020. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0020Google Scholar
Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Shwalb, D. W., Shwalb, B. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2013). Fathers in cultural context. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. C. (1989). Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Functional Ecology, 3(3), 259–268.Google Scholar
Stearns, S. C. (1992). The evolution of life histories. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Székely, T. (2014). Sexual conflict between parents: Offspring desertion and asymmetrical parental care. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 6, a017665. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017665Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. (1976). Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. The American Naturalist, 110, 153–163.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Valle, G., & Tillman, K. H. (2014). Childhood family structure and romantic relationships during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 35(1), 97–124.Google Scholar
van Schaik, C. P., & Burkart, J. M. (2010). Mind the gap: Cooperative breeding and the evolution of our unique features. In Kappeler, P. & Silk, J (Eds.), Mind the gap (pp. 477–496). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Washburn, S., & Lancaster, C. (1968). The evolution of hunting. In Lee, R. B. & Devore, I (Eds.), Man the hunter (pp. 293–303). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Westneat, D. F., & Sherman, P. W. (1993). Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 66–77.Google Scholar
Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M., Jr., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. The American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.Google Scholar
Wright, P. C. (1990). Patterns of paternal care in primates. International Journal of Primatology, 11, 89–102.Google Scholar
Yamamura, N., & Tsuji, N. (1993). Parental care as a game. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 6, 103–127.Google Scholar

References

Adinkrah, M. (2003). Men who kill their own children: Paternal filicide incidents in contemporary Fiji. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 557–568.Google Scholar
Alder, C., & Polk, K. (2001). Child victims of homicide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D. (1979). Darwinism and human affairs. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2005). The murderer next door. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 203–252.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1994). Some differential attributes of lethal assaults on small children by stepfathers versus genetic fathers. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 207–217.Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2001). An assessment of some proposed exceptions to the phenomenon of nepotistic discrimination against stepchildren. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 38, 287–296.Google Scholar
Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2008). The origins of homicide. In Duntley, J. D. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary forensic psychology: Darwinian foundations of crime and law (pp. 41–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Homicide adaptions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 399–410.Google Scholar
Durrant, J. E. (1999). Evaluating the success of Sweden’s corporal punishment ban. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 435–448.Google Scholar
Durrant, J. E. & Janson, S. (2005). Law reform, corporal punishment and child abuse: The case of Sweden. International Review of Victimology, 12, 139–158.Google Scholar
Flynn, S. M., Shaw, J. J., & Abel, K. M. (2013). Filicide: Mental illness in those who kill their children. PLoS One, 8(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.Google Scholar
Harris, G. T., Hilton, N. Z., Rice, M. E., & Eke, A. W. (2007). Children killed by genetic parents versus stepparents. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 85–95.Google Scholar
Hatters Friedman, S. H., Hrouda, D. R., Holden, C. E., Noffsinger, S. G., & Resnick, P. J. (2005). Filicide-suicide: Common factors in parents who kill their children and themselves. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 33, 496–504.Google Scholar
Kauppi, A., Kumpulainen, K., Karkola, K., Vanamo, T., & Merikanto, J. (2010). Maternal and paternal filicides: A retrospective review of filicides in Finland. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38, 229–238.Google Scholar
Laurssen, T. M., Munk-Olsen, T., Mortensen, P. B., Abel, K. M., Appleby, M., & Webb, R. T. (2011). Filicide in offspring of parents with severe psychiatric disorders: A population-based cohort study of child homicide. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72, 698–703.Google Scholar
Lehti, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Kivivuori, J. (2012). The declining number of child homicide in Finland, 1960-2009. Homicide Studies, 16(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Liem, M., & Koenraadt, F. (2008a). Filicide: A comparative study of maternal versus paternal child homicide. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 18, 166–176.Google Scholar
Liem, M., & Koenraadt, F. (2008b). Familicide: A comparison with spousal and child homicide by mentally disordered perpetrators. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18, 305–318.Google Scholar
Ottesen, V. (2016). An evolutionary psychological analysis of filicide in Norway, 1990–2009. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo. Retrieved from www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/50525Google Scholar
Ottesen, V. (2020). Filicide. In Shackelford, T & Weekes-Shackelford, V. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Overpeck, M. D., Brenner, R. A., Trumble, A. C., Trifiletti, L. B., & Berendes, H. W. (1998). Risk factors for infant homicide in the Unites States. The New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 1211–1216.Google Scholar
Resnick, P. J. (1969). Child murder by parents: A psychiatric review of filicide. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126(3), 325–334.Google Scholar
Somander, L. K. H., & Rammer, L. M. (1991). Intra- and extra-familial child homicide in Sweden 1971–1980. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 45–55.Google Scholar
Sturup, S., & Granath, S. (2014). Child homicide in Sweden: A descriptive study comparing the 1990s and the 2000s. Homicide Studies, 19(1), 175–187.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 52–95). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.Google Scholar
Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., & Shackelford, T. (2004). Methods of filicide: Stepparents and genetic parents kill differently. Violence & Victims, 19(1), 75–81.Google Scholar
Wilczynski, A. (1997). Child homicide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., Daly, M., & Daniele, A. (1995) Familicide: The killing of spouse and children. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 275–291.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Postcopulatory Adaptations
  • Edited by Todd K. Shackelford, Oakland University, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
  • Online publication: 30 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943543.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Postcopulatory Adaptations
  • Edited by Todd K. Shackelford, Oakland University, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
  • Online publication: 30 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943543.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Postcopulatory Adaptations
  • Edited by Todd K. Shackelford, Oakland University, Michigan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
  • Online publication: 30 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943543.017
Available formats
×