Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T05:01:05.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

41 - Social and Sociological Factors in the Development of Expertise

from PART VI - GENERALIZABLE MECHANISMS MEDIATING EXPERTISE AND GENERAL ISSUES

By
Harald A. Mieg
Edited by
K. Anders Ericsson ,
Neil Charness ,
Paul J. Feltovich  and
Robert R. Hoffman
Harald A. Mieg
Affiliation:
Geographisches Institut, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
K. Anders Ericsson
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Neil Charness
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Paul J. Feltovich
Affiliation:
University of West Florida
Robert R. Hoffman
Affiliation:
University of West Florida
Get access

Summary

We have serious difficulties when it comes to explaining what really defines an “expert” – a difficulty that goes beyond the explanatory range of defining experts by their individual performance. Take, for example, people who provide political advice or consult multinationals. What would qualify them as experts? How can we assess their performance? How can we disentangle their individual expert contribution and the success of the enterprise or party they work for? We cannot understand these cases if we don't consider what Hoffman, Feltovich, and Ford (1997) concluded: the “minimum unit of analysis” is the “expert-in-context” (p. 553)(see also Clancey, Chapter 8).

For the purpose of this chapter on social and sociological factors in the development of expertise, I assume that an expert has to be regarded as the connection between a person and a function. The function indicates the social context of the expert performance. In the following, I use a broad notion of function that includes both the pertinent duties and the effects of expert performance, such as the duties and work of a doctor, as well as the effect of music on its audience. In short: I understand function as defined by what an audience, patient, or customer would pay for. The function of medical therapy is to render a sick person healthy. The function of music is to please the audience (as entertainment) or peer professionals (as being excellent).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance , pp. 743 - 760
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adler, A. (1912). Über den nervösen Charakter [The neurotic constitution]. München: Bergmann.Google Scholar
Agnew, N. M., Ford, K., M., & Hayes, P. J. (1997). Expertise in context: Personally constructed, socially selected and reality-relevant? In Feltovich, P. J., Ford, K. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 219–244). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Antons, C. (2004). Folklore protection in Australia: Who is expert in aboriginal tradition? In Kurz-Milcke, E. & Gigerenzer, G. (Eds.), Experts in science and society (pp. 85–103). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Baron, J. N., & Hannan, M. T. (2002). Organizational blueprints for success in high-tech start-ups: Lessons from the Stanford project on emerging companies. Stanford, CA: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction [Distinction]. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecil, J. S., & Willging, T. E. (1993). Court-appointed experts: Defining the role of experts appointed under Federal Rule of Evidence 706. Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Crozier, M. (1964). The bureaucratic phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dietz, T. M., & Rycroft, R. W. (1987). The risk professionals. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Dippel, K. (1986). Die Stellung des Sachverständigen im Strafprozeß [The legal position of experts in criminal cases]. Heidelberg: R. V. Decker's.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1991). Developmental work research: Reconstructing expertise through expansive learning. In Nurminen, M. & Weir, G. R. S. (Eds.), Human jobs and computer interfaces. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Evetts, J. (2003). Professionalization and professionalism: Explaining professional performance initiatives. In Mieg, H. A. & Pfadenhauer, M. (Eds.), Professionelle Leistung – Professional Performance (pp. 49–69). Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Ferrari, M. (Ed.). (2002). The pursuit of excellence through education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1998). Extraordinary minds. Portraits of exceptional individuals and an examination of our extraordinariness. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Gecas, V. (2001). Socialization: sociology of. In Smelser, N. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 14525–14530). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. H. (1968). Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review, 33, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallman, J. C. (2003). The chess artist. New York: Thomas Dunne.Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerning, E. (2003). Ärztinnen und Ärzte in der DDR [Doctors in the GDR]. In Mieg, H. & Pfadenhauer, M. (Ed.), Professionelle Leistung – Professional Performance (pp. 111–145). Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Feltovich, P. J., & Ford, K. M. (1997). A general framework for conceiving of expertise and expert systems in context. In Feltovich, P. J., Ford, K. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 543–580). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R. R., Shadbolt, N. R., Burton, A. M., & Klein, G. (1995). Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1080–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacoby, S., & Gonzales, P. (1991). The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 149–181.Google Scholar
Jaques, E. (1976). A general theory of bureaucracy. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (1994). The fifth branch. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langer, E. J. (1983). The psychology of control. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, R., Nagai, A. K., & Rothman, S. (1996). American elites. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester: John Wiley. (German original in 1968.)Google Scholar
Mieg, H. A. (2000). University-based projects for local sustainable development: Designing expert roles and collective reasoning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1, 67–82.Google Scholar
Mieg, H. A. (2001). The social psychology of expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mieg, H. A., & Pfadenhauer, M. (Eds.). (2003). Professionelle Leistung – Professional Performance: Positionen der Professionssoziologie [Professional performance: Approaches to the sociology of professions]. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Kurz-Milcke, E., & Gigerenzer, G. (Eds.). (2004). Experts in science and society. New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otway, H., & Winterfeldt, D. (1992). Expert judgment in risk analysis and management: Process, context, and pitfalls. Risk Analysis, 12(1), 83–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, T. (1955). Family structure and the socialization of the child. In Parsons, T. & Bales, R. F. (Eds.), Family, socialization, and interaction Processes. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1953). Origin of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge (French original in 1936.).Google Scholar
Platt, G. M. (2001). Status and role, social psychology of. In Smelser, N. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 15090–15095). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1976). The comparative study of political elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 173–220). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, F. F. (Ed.). (1991). Expert witnesses. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Rumbaut, R. G., & Portes, A. (Eds.). (2001). Ehnicities: Children of immigrants in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. (1997). Studying working intelligence. In Tobach, E. et al. (Eds.), Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner (pp. 338–366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally & published in 1984.)Google Scholar
Shanteau, J. (1992). The psychology of experts. In Wright, G. & Bolger, F. (Eds.), Expertise and decision support (pp. 11–23). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung [Sociology: Studies on the forms of sociation]. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1971). On individuality and social forms (trans. by K. H. Wolff, ed. by Levine, D. N.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In Worchel, S., Wood, W., & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Group process and productivity Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stein, E. W. (1992). A method to identify candidates for knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 619–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teichler, H. J., & Reinartz, K. (1999). Das Leistungssportsystem der DDR in den 80er Jahren und im Prozeß der Wende [Training systems in professional sports in the GDR in the 1980s and subsequent to German unification]. Schorndorf: Verlag Karl Hofmann.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Russian original in 1934.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1979). Economy and society (Vol. I, G. Roth & C. Wittich, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Mullen, B. & Goethals, G. R. (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and control. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×