Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:15:08.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

28 - OFFER

Behaviorally Coding Indirect and Direct Information Exchange in Negotiations

from Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Yao, J., Brett, J., & Zhang, Z. X. n.d. Multi-issue offers: A low-trust path to joint gains in negotiations. Paper presented at the International Association for Conflict Management conference, Berlin, Germany, July 2017.Google Scholar
Yao, J., Zhang, Z. X., & Brett, J. (2017). Understanding trust development in negotiations: An interdependent approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 712729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Adair, W. L., & Brett, J. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16(1), 3351. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, W. L., Okumura, T., & Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 371385. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.371CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curhan, J., & Pentland, A., (2007). Thin slices of negotiation: Predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 802811. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Dreu, C., Evers, A. Beersma, B., Klewer, E., Nauta, A. (2001). A theory based measure of conflict management in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(6), 645668. doi:10.1002/job.107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F. 2012. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. (White paper). Retrieved February 16, 2018, from www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D., & Cook, W. L. 2006. Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kong, D. T., Dirks, K., & Ferrin, D. (2014). Interpersonal trust within negotiations: Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and direction for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 12351255. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159174. doi:10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, M. (2009). The intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of anger on negotiation strategies: A cross-cultural investigation. Human Communication Research, 35(1), 148169. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01342.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olekalns, M. Brett, J. M., & Weingart, L. R. 2004. Phases, transitions and interruptions: The processes that shape agreement in multi-party negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management: Special Issue on Processes in Negotiation, 14(3), 191211. doi:10.1108/eb022898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2000). Understanding optimal outcomes: The role of strategy sequences in competitive negotiations. Human Communication Research, 26(4), 527–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00768.xGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. 1981. Negotiation Behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(1), 731. doi:10.1108/eb022839CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×