Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:25:47.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Research Approaches to Heritage Languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2021

Edited by
Silvina Montrul  and
Maria Polinsky
Silvina Montrul
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Maria Polinsky
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics , pp. 373 - 578
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Åfarli, T. 1994. A Promotion Analysis of Restrictive Relative Clauses. The Linguistic Review 11, 81–100.Google Scholar
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., and Choueiri, L.. 2010. The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albirini, A. 2014. Toward Understanding the Variability in the Language Proficiencies of Arabic Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 18(6), 730–765.Google Scholar
Albirini, A. and Benmamoun, E.. 2015. Factors Affecting the Retention of Sentential Negation in Heritage Egyptian Arabic. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8(3), 470–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Chakrani, B.. 2013. Gender and Number Agreement in the Oral Production of Arabic Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 1–18.Google Scholar
Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Saadah, E.. 2011. Grammatical Features of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic Heritage Speakers’ Oral Production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45, 273–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arad, M. 2003. Roots and Patterns. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Au, T., Knightly, L., Jun, S., and Oh, J.. 2002. Overhearing a Language during Childhood. Psychological Science 13, 238–243.Google Scholar
Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E. 2000. The Feature Structure of Functional Categories: A Comparative Study of Arabic Dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E. 2017. VSO Word Order, Primarily in Arabic Languages. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Bhatia, A., and Polinsky, M.. 2009. Closest Conjunct Agreement in Head Final Languages. In van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen (ed.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 67–88.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39, 129–181.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Albirini, A., Montrul, S., and Saadah, E.. 2014. Arabic Plurals and Root and Pattern Morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian Heritage Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(1), 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Abunasser, M., Al-Sabbagh, R., Bidaoui, A., and Shalash, D.. 2014. The Location of Sentential Negation in Arabic Varieties. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 5, 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J. K., Nicol, J., and Cutting, J. C.. 1999. The Ties That Bind: Creating Number Agreement in Speech. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolonyai, A. 2007. (In)vulnerable Agreement in Incomplete Bilingual L1 Learners. The International Journal of Bilingualism 11, 3–21.Google Scholar
Borer, H. 2005a. Structuring Sense: Vol. 1. In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, H. 2005b. Structuring Sense: Vol. 2. The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, H. 2013. Structuring Sense: Vol. 3. Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brame, M. 1968. A New Analysis of the Relative Clause: Evidence for an Interpretive Theory. Unpublished ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1977. ‘On wh-Movement.’ In Culicover, P. et al. (eds.), Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 71–132.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Martin, R. et al. (eds.), Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2019. Some Puzzling Foundational Issues: The Reading Program. Catalan Journal of Linguistics Special Issue, 263–285.Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A. 1993. Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Godson, L. 2004. Phonetics of Language Attrition: Vowel Production and Articulatory Setting in the Speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. Ph.D. dissertation, UCSD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G. 1995. Syntax and Morphology of Language Attrition: A Study of Five Bilingual Expatriate Swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5, 153–171.Google Scholar
Halle, M. and Marantz, A.. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–176.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. 2018. The Minimalist Program after 25 Years. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 49–65.Google Scholar
Jelinek, E. 1981. On Defining Categories: Aux and Predicate in EgyptianGoogle Scholar
Colloquial Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. and Comrie, B.. 1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2009. Binding Interpretations of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 16, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, H. and Szabolcsi, A.. 2000. Verbal Complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Larsson, I and Johannessen, J. B.. 2015. Embedded Word Order in Heritage Scandinavian. In Hilpert, M., Östman, J.-O., Mertzlufft, C., and Riessler, M. (eds.), New Trends in Nordic and General Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1979. Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1981. A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12(3), 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. and Prince, A.. 1990. Foot and Word in Prosodic Morphology: The Arabic Broken Plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 209–283.Google Scholar
Mohammad, M. 1988. On the Parallelism between IP and DP. In Borer, H. (ed.), Proceedings of WCCFL VII. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 241–254.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2010. How Similar are L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers? Spanish Clitics and Word Order. Applied Psycholinguistics 31, 167–207.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S., Au, T. K.-F., and Jun, S.-A.. 2010. Early Childhood Language Memory in the Speech Perception of International Adoptees. Journal of Child Language 37, 1123–1132.Google Scholar
Oh, J., Jun, S., Knightly, L., and Au, T. K.-F.. 2003. Holding on to Childhood Language Memory. Cognition 86, B53–B64.Google Scholar
Omar, M. 1973. The Acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a Native Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2011. Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language: A Case for Attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 305–328.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Scontras, G.. 2020. Understanding Heritage Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23, 4–20.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
Saadah, E. 2011. The production of Arabic Vowels by English L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers of Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. and Murasugi, K.. 2015. Noun Incorporation and Case in Heritage Inuktitut. In S. Vinerte (ed.) Proceedings of the 2015 Canadian Linguistic Association Annual Conference.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, U. 1997. Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic: An Essay in Comparative Semitic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, U. 2004. The Form of Semitic Noun Phrases. Lingua 114(12), 1465–1526.Google Scholar
Soltan, U. 2007. On Formal Feature Licensing in Minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic Morphosyntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2004. Native Language Attrition and Developmental Instability at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Data, Interpretations and Methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2), 143–145.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. 2016. Quantity and Quality of Language Input in Bilingual Language Development. In Nicoladis, E. and Montanari, S. (eds.), Lifespan Perspectives on Bilingualism. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 136–196.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J. R. 1974. French Relative Clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Yip, V. and Mathews, S.. 2007. The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ambridge, B. 2010. Review of Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition: Defining the Limits of Frequency as an Explanatory Concept, ed. by I. Gülzow & N. Gagarina. Journal of Child Language 37, 453–475.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B. and Kidd, E.. 2015. The Ubiquity of Frequency Effects. Journal of Child Language 42, 239–273.Google Scholar
Baker, C. 2014. A Parents’ and Teachers’ Guide to Bilingualism. Clarendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. and Schlesewsky, M.. 2009. The Role of Prominence Information in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. Language and Linguistics Compass 3, 19–58.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2002. Sequentiality as the Basis of Constituent Structure. In Givón, T. and Malle, B. (eds.), The Evolution of Language Out of Pre-Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 109–134.Google Scholar
Chien, Y.-C. and Wexler, K.. 1990. Children’s Knowledge of Locality Conditions in Binding as Evidence for the Modularity of Syntax and Pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1, 225–295.Google Scholar
Cho, S. 1999. The Acquisition of Relative Clauses: Experimental Studies on Korean. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Clackson, K., Felser, C., and Clahsen, H.. 2011. Children’s Processing of Reflexives and Pronouns in English: Evidence for Eye-Movements during Listening. Journal of Memory and Language 65, 128–144.Google Scholar
Clifton, C. and Frazier, L.. 1989. Comprehending Sentences with Long-distance Dependencies. In Carlson, G. and Tanenhaus, M. (eds.), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 273–317.Google Scholar
Conroy, A., Takahashi, E., Lidz, J., and Phillips, C.. 2009. Equal Treatment for All Antecedents: How Children Succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 446–486.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Goro, T., and Thornton, R.. 2006. Language Acquisition Is Language Change. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35, 31–49.Google Scholar
Deen, K. 2011. The Acquisition of the Passive. In de Villiers, J. and Roeper, T. (eds.), Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. New York: Springer, 155–187.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. 2002. Reflections on Frequency Effects in Language Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 297–339.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. 2016. Frequency in Language Learning and Language Change. In Behrens, H. and Pfänder, S. (eds.), Experience Counts: Frequency Effects in Language. Berlin: de Gruyter, 239–256.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. 2007. A Short Guide to Raising Children Bilingually. Multilingual Living Magazine 2, 18–21.Google Scholar
Goodluck, H. and Stojanovic, D.. 1996.The Structure and Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Serbo-Croatian. Language Acquisition 5, 285–315.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. 2000. The Neurology of Syntax: Language Use without Broca’s Area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23, 1–71.Google Scholar
Gülzow, I. and Gagarina, N.. 2007. Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition: Defining the Limits of Frequency as an Explanatory Concept. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hart, B. and Risley, T.. 1995. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. 2014. Cross-linguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford: OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., and Parra, M., 2012. Dual Language Exposure and Early Bilingual Development. Journal of Child Language 39, 1–27.Google Scholar
Hsu, C.-C., Hermon, G., and Zukowski, A.. 2009. Young Children’s Production of Head-Final Relative Clauses: Elicited Production Data from Chinese Children. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18, 323–360.Google Scholar
Huh, Sorin. 2015. A Corpus Study of L2 Korean Relative Clause Development. Language Research 51, 845–868.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. 1980. Remarks on to-contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 239–245.Google Scholar
Jeon, K. S. and Kim, H.-Y.. 2007. Development of Relativization in Korean as a Foreign Language: The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy in Head-internal and Head-external Relative Clause. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S. 2014. The Role of Syntactic and Semantic Information in the Frequency Distribution of Relative Clauses in Korean: A Corpus-based Analysis. Language Information 19, 5–32.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. and Comrie, B.. 1977. Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 63–100.Google Scholar
Kim, C.-E. and O’Grady, W.. 2016. Asymmetries in Children’s Production of Relative Clauses: Data from English and Korean. Journal of Child Language 42, 1038–1071.Google Scholar
Kim, H.-S. 2005. Processing Strategies and Transfer of Heritage and Non-heritage Learners of Korean. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2009. Binding Interpretations of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 16, 3–35.Google Scholar
Kwon, N., Polinsky, M., and Kluender, R.. 2006. Subject Preference in Korean. In Baumer, D., Montero, D., and Scanlon, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 1–14.Google Scholar
Kwon, N., Lee, Y., Gordon, P., and Kluender, R.. 2010. Cognitive and Linguistic Factors Affecting Subject/Object Asymmetry: An Eye-tracking Study of Prenominal Relative Clauses in Korean. Language 86, 546–582.Google Scholar
Lee-Ellis, S. 2009. The Development and Validation of a Korean C-Test Using Rasch Analysis. Language Testing 26, 245–274.Google Scholar
Lee-Ellis, S. 2011. The Elicited Production of Korean Relative Clauses by Heritage Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 57–89.Google Scholar
Lohndal, T., Rothman, J., Kupisch, T., and Westergaard, M.. 2019. Heritage Language Acquisition: What It Reveals and Why It Is Important for Formal Linguistic Theories. Language and Linguistics Compass 13, https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12357Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1843. A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longmans, Green and Co..Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nevins, A., Pesetsky, D., and Rodrigues, C.. 2009. Pirahã Exceptionality: A Reassessment. Language 85, 355–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, J. and Swinney, D.. 1989. The Role of Structure in Coreference Assignment during Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18, 5–19.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W. 2008. Does Emergentism Have a Chance? In Chan, H., Jacob, H., and Kapia, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 16–35.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W. 2013. The Illusion of Language Acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3, 253–285.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W. 2015a. Anaphora and the Case for Emergentism. In MacWhinney, B. and O’Grady, W. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell, 100–122,Google Scholar
O’Grady, W. 2015b. Processing Determinism. Language Learning 65, 6–32.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and Choo, M.. 2001. The Acquisition of Relative Clauses by Heritage and Non-heritage Learners of Korean as a Second Language: A Comparative Study. Journal of Korean Language Education 12, 283–294.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and Choo, M.. 2003. A Subject-Object Asymmetry in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Korean as a Second Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 433–448.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and Kwak, H.. 2009. Emergentism and Second Language Acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (eds.), The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Bingley: Emerald Press, 69–88.Google Scholar
Pearson, B., Fernández, S., Lewedeg, V., and Oller, D.. 1997. The Relation of Input Factors to Lexical Learning by Bilingual Infants. Applied Psycholinguistics 18, 41–58.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2011. Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 305–332.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Scontras, G.. 2019. Understanding Heritage Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22, in press.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. and Chomsky, N.. 2018. Towards Eliminating Arbitrary Stipulations Related to Parameters: Linguistic Innateness and the Variation Model. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8, 764–769.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. and Slabakova, R.. 2018. The Generative Approach to SLA and Its Place in Modern Second Language Studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40, 417–442.Google Scholar
Roy, D. 2009. New Horizons in the Study of Child Language Acquisition. Proceedings of Interspeech 2009. Brighton. Retrieved from http://dkroy.media.mit.edu/publications/Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z., and Polinsky, M.. 2015. Heritage Language and Linguistic Theory. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences 6, 1–20.Google Scholar
Song, M., O’Grady, W., Cho, S., and Lee, M.. 1997. The Learning and Teaching of Korean in Community Schools. In Kim, Y.-H. (ed.), Korean language in America 2. American Association of Teachers of Korean, 111–127.Google Scholar
Townsend, D. and Bever, T.. 2001. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traxler, M., Morris, R., and Seely, R.. 2002. Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 69–90.Google Scholar
Van de Weijer, J. 2002. How Much Does an Infant Hear in a Day? Proceedings of the GALA2001 Conference on Language Acquisition, 2002. Retrieved from http://person2.sol.lu.se/JoostVanDeWeijer/Texts/gala01.pdfGoogle Scholar
van Rij, J., van Rijn, J., and Hendriks, P.. 2010. Language Acquisition: A Case Study in Pronoun Comprehension. Journal of Child Language 37, 731–766.Google Scholar
Warren, P., Speer, S., and Schafer, A.. 2003. Wanna-contraction and Prosodic Disambiguation in US and NZ English. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 15, 31–49.Google Scholar
Wells, C. 1985. Language Development in the Pre-school Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yun, J., Chen, Z., Hunter, T., Whitman, J., and Hale, J.. 2015. Uncertainty in Processing Relative Clauses across East Asian Languages. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24, 113–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zukowski, A. 2009. Elicited Production of Relative Clauses in Children with Williams Syndrome. Language and Cognition Processes 24, 1–42.Google Scholar

References

Alim, H. S., Rickford, J., and Ball, A. (eds.) 2016. Raciolinguistics. How Language Shapes Our Ideas about Race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvord, S. and Rogers, B.. 2014. Miami Cuban Spanish Vowels in Contact. Sociolinguistic Studies 8(1), 139–170.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. R. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. 1999. Loss of Gender Agreement in L1 Attrition: Preliminary Results. Bilingual Research Journal 23(4), 389–408.Google Scholar
Anya, U. 2016. Realized Identities in Second Language Learning: Speaking Blackness in Brazil. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Avineri, N. 2012. Heritage Language Socialization Practices in Secular Yiddish Educational Contexts: The Creation of a Metalinguistic Community. Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA. Retrieved from www.bjpa.org/content/upload/bjpa/c__c/Avineri-%20Heritage%20Language%20Socialization.pdf.Google Scholar
Avineri, N. 2017. Contested Stance Practices in Secular Yiddish Metalinguistic Communities: Negotiating Closeness and Distance. Journal of Jewish Languages 5(2), 174–199.Google Scholar
Avineri, N. 2019. The ‘Heritage Narratives’ of Yiddish Metalinguistic Community Members. In Falconi, E. and Garber, K. (eds.), The Tales We Tell: Storytelling and Narrative Practice. Leiden: Brill Publishers.Google Scholar
Avineri, N. and Kroskrity, P. V.. 2014. On the (Re-)Production and Representation of Endangered Language Communities: Social Boundaries and Temporal Borders. In Avineri, N. and Kroskrity, P. V. (eds.), Reconceptualizing Endangered Language Communities: Crossing Borders and Constructing Boundaries. [Special Issue]. Language & Communication 38(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
Avni, S. 2012. Hebrew as Heritage: The Work of Language in Religious and Communal Continuity. Linguistics and Education 23(3), 323–333.Google Scholar
Back, M. and Zavala, V. (eds.) 2019. Racialization and Language: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from Peru. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bale, J. 2010. Arabic As a Heritage Language in the United States. International Multilingual Research Journal 4(2), 125–151.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, G. 2015. Narrative Inquiry. In Paltridge, B. and Phakiti, A. (eds.), Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury, 169–185.Google Scholar
Beaudrie, S., Ducar, C., and Relaño-Pastor, A. M.. 2009. Curricular Perspectives in the Heritage Language Context: Assessing Culture and Identity. Language, Culture and Curriculum 22(2), 157–174.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. 1971. Class, Codes and Control. Vol. I. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bleaman, I. L. 2018. Outcomes of Minority Language Maintenance: Variation and Change in New York Yiddish (Publication No. 10824723). Doctoral dissertation, New York University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
Bloch, A. and Hirsch, S.. 2017. “Second Generation” Refugees and Multilingualism: Identity, Race and Language Transmission. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40(14), 2444–2462.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1979. La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris,FR: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brice Heath, S. 1983. Ways with Words. Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. 1999. ‘Why Be Normal?’: Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls. Language in Society 28(2), 203–223.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K.. 2005. Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5), 585–614.Google Scholar
Burns, K. E. and Waugh, L. R.. 2018. Mixed Messages in the Spanish Heritage Language Classroom: Insights from CDA of Textbooks and Instructor Focus Group Discussions. Heritage Language Journal 15(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. and Kulick, D.. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carreira, M. and Beeman, T.. 2014. Voces: Latino Students on Life in the United States. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Carreira, M. and Kagan, O.. 2011. The Results of the National Heritage Language Survey: Implications for Teaching, Curriculum Design, and Professional Development. Retrieved from the National Heritage Language Resource Center website: www.nhlrc.ucla.edu/surveyreport/paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cashman, H. 2018. Queer, Latinx, & Bilingual: Narrative Resources in the Negotiation of Identities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chang, C. and Yao, Y.. 2016. Toward an Understanding of Heritage Prosody: Acoustic and Perceptual Properties of Tone Produced by Heritage, Native, and Second Language Speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 134–160.Google Scholar
Chaparro, S. 2019. But Mom! I’m Not a Spanish Boy: Raciolinguistic Socialization in a Two-way Immersion Bilingual Program. Linguistics and Education 50, 1–12.Google Scholar
Chappell, W. 2019. The Sociophonetic Perception of Heritage Spanish Speakers in the United States: Reactions to Labiodentalized <v> in the Speech of Late Immigrant and U.S.-born Voices. In Chappell, W. (ed.), Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 240–264.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhou, Q., and Uchikoshi, Y.,. 2018. Heritage Language Socialization in Chinese American Immigrant Families: Prospective Links to Children’s Heritage Language Proficiency. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 1996. Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Creese, A. 2009. Building on Young People’s Linguistic and Cultural Continuity: Complementary Schools in the United Kingdom. Theory Into Practice 48(4), 267–273.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Forum 89(1), 139–167.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. and Danesi, M.. 1990. Heritage Languages: The Development and Denial of Canada’s Linguistic Resources. Toronto: Our Schools/Our Selves and Garamond Press.Google Scholar
Curdt-Christiansen, X. 2008. Reading the World through Words: Cultural Themes in Heritage Chinese Language Textbooks. Language and Education 22(2), 95–113.Google Scholar
Dao, M. D. and Nguyen, A. T.. 2017. Vietnamese Tones Produced by Australian Vietnamese Speakers. Heritage Language Journal 14(3), 224–247.Google Scholar
Dean-Olmsted, E. M. 2012. Speaking Shami: Syrian Jewish Mexican Language Practices as Strategies of Integration and Legitimation (Publication No. 3509907). Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
Del Valle, J. (ed.) 2007. La lengua, ¿patria común? Ideas e ideologías del español. Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Demuro, E. and Gurney, L.. 2018. Mapping Language, Culture, Ideology: Rethinking Language in Foreign Language Instruction. Language and Intercultural Communication 18(3), 287–299.Google Scholar
DuBord, E. and Kimball, E.. 2016. Cross-language Community Engagement: Assessing the Strengths of Heritage Learners. Heritage Language Journal 13(3), 298–330.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. 2018. Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. In Litosseliti, L. (ed.), Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury, 305–330.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic Variation As Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. 1966. Language Loyalty in the United States: The Maintenance and Perpetuation of Non-English Mother Tongues by American Ethnic and Religious Groups. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. 2001. 300-Plus Years of Heritage Language Education in the United States. In Peyton, J. K., Ranard, D. A., and McGinnis, S. (eds.), Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource. McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics, 81–97.Google Scholar
Flores, C. 2010. The Effect of Age on Language Attrition: Evidence from Bilingual Returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(4), 533–546.Google Scholar
García-Sánchez, I. M. 2010. The Politics of Arabic Language Education: Moroccan Immigrant Children’s Language Socialization into Ethnic and Religious Identities. Linguistics and Education 21(3), 171–196.Google Scholar
Goble, R. A. 2016. Linguistic Insecurity and Lack of Entitlement to Spanish among Third-generation Mexican Americans in Narrative Accounts. Heritage Language Journal 13(1), 29–54.Google Scholar
Guardado, M. 2014. The Discourses of Heritage Language Development: Engaging Ideologies in Canadian Hispanic Communities. Heritage Language Journal 11(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. 1968. The Speech Community. In Sills, D. L. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan, 381–386.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rivas, C. 2011a. Variación y cambio pragmático en el español de los cubanos en Miami: el efecto de la generación en el discurso bilingüe. In García, C. and Placencia, M. E. (eds.), Estudios de variación pragmática en español. Buenos Aires: Dunken, 167–183.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rivas, C. 2011b. El efecto del género en el discurso bilingüe. Un estudio sobre peticiones. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada 54, 37–59.Google Scholar
Guy, G. 2011. Language, Social Class, and Status. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–185.Google Scholar
Harasta, J. 2017. ‘Because They Are Cornish’: Four Uses of a Useless Language. Heritage Language Journal 14, 248–263.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2010. The Heart of Heritage: Sociocultural Dimensions of Heritage Language Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30, 66–82.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, M. 1993. The Dialectics of Language Maintenance and Language Loyalty in Chula Vista, CA: A Two-Generation Study. In Roca, A. and Lipski, J. M. (eds.), Spanish in the U.S.: Language Contact and Diversity. Berlin: Mouton, 47–71.Google Scholar
Hill, J. 2008. The Everyday Language of White Racism. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. 2007. Discourses of Endangerment: Contexts and Consequences of Essentializing Discourses. In Duchene, A. and Heller, M. (eds.), Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 57–75.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J., Avineri, N., and Johnson, D. C.. 2017. Exposing Gaps in/between Discourses of Linguistic Deficits. International Multilingual Research Journal 11(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. 2012. Intercultural Competence of Heritage Language Learners: Motivation, Identity, Language Attitudes, and the Curriculum. Proceedings of Second Intercultural Competence Conference 2, 72–84.Google Scholar
Kang, Y. and Nagy, N.. 2016. VOT Merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. Language Variation and Change 28(2), 249–272.Google Scholar
King, K. A. 2000. Language Ideologies and Heritage Language Education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 3(3), 167–184.Google Scholar
Kirschen, B. 2020. Intergenerational Transmission of Ladino: Three Generations of Speakers in the Twenty-First Century. Heritage Language Journal 17(1), 70–91.Google Scholar
Kirschen, B. 2015. Judeo-Spanish Encounters Modern Spanish: Language Contact and Diglossia among the Sephardim of Los Angeles and New York City. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Kirschen, B. 2016. Diglossic Distribution among Judeo-Spanish-Speaking Sephardim in the United States. In Ross, S., Soomekh, S., and Ansell, L. (eds.), Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews in America: The Jewish Role in American Life. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 25–52.Google Scholar
Kirschen, B. 2019. Lexical Variation among South Florida’s Judeo-Spanish-speaking Sephardim. Journal of Jewish Languages 7(1), 53–84.Google Scholar
Klee, C. and Caravedo, R.. 2019. Migration and Orders of Indexicality in Lima. In Lynch, A. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish in the Global City. London: Routledge, 176–203.Google Scholar
Klein, W. 2013. Speaking Punjabi: Heritage Language Socialization and Language Ideologies in a Sikh Education Program. Heritage Language Journal 10(1), 36–50.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. V. 2004. Language Ideologies. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 496–517.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Hailer, K., Klaschik, E., Stangen, I., Lein, T., and van de Weijer, J.. 2014. Foreign Accent in Adult Simultaneous Bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal 11(2), 123–150.Google Scholar
Kurata, N. 2015. Motivational Selves of Japanese Heritage Speakers in Australia. Heritage Language Journal 12(2), 110–131.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. and Taylor, D.. 1996. Language in the Lives of Ethnic Minorities: Cuban American Families in Miami. Applied Linguistics 17(4), 477–500.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. 2000. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leap, W. 1996. Word’s Out: Gay Men’s English. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. S. 2002. The Korean Language in America: The Role of Cultural Identity in Heritage Language Learning. Language, Culture, and Curriculum 15(2), 117–133.Google Scholar
Leeman, J. 2015. Heritage Language Education and Identity in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35, 100–119.Google Scholar
Leeman, J. and Martínez, G.. 2007. From Identity to Commodity: Discourses of Spanish in Heritage Language Textbooks. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 4(1), 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, J., Rabin, L., and Román-Mendoza, E.. 2011. Critical Pedagogy beyond the Classroom Walls: Community Service-learning and Spanish Heritage Language Education. Heritage Language Journal 8(3), 481–495.Google Scholar
Leonard, W. Y. 2017. Producing Language Reclamation by Decolonising ‘Language’. In Leonard, W. Y. and De Korne, H. (eds.), Language Documentation and Description. London: EL Publishing, 15–36.Google Scholar
Li, Q., Zhang, H., and Taguchi, N.. 2017). The Use of Mitigation Devices in Heritage Learners of Chinese. Heritage Language Journal 14(2), 150–170.Google Scholar
Livia, A. and Hall, K. (eds.) 1997. Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lo, A. 2009. Lessons about Respect and Affect in a Korean Heritage Language School. Linguistics and Education 20(3), 217–234.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. 2009. A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Final /s/ in Miami Cuban Spanish. Language Sciences 31(6), 767–790.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. 2017. The Social Diffusion of English-based Lexical Innovations in Miami Cuban Spanish. In Cuza, A. (ed.), Cuban Spanish Dialectology: Variation, Contact and Change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 165–187.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. 2018a. A Historical View of US Latinidad and Spanish as Heritage Language. In Potowski, K. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish as a Heritage Language. London: Routledge, 17–35.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. 2018b. Spatial Reconfigurations of Spanish in Postmodernity: The Relationship to English and Minoritized Languages. In King, J. and Sessarego, S. (eds.), The Dynamics of Language Variation and Change: Varieties of Spanish across Space and Time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–34.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. (ed.) 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Spanish in the Global City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Łyskawa, P., Maddeaux, R., Melara, E., and Nagy, N.. 2016. Heritage Speakers Follow All the Rules: Language Contact and Convergence in Polish Devoicing. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 219–244.Google Scholar
Maloof, V. M., Rubin, D. L., and Miller, A. N.. 2006. Cultural Competence and Identity in Cross-Cultural Adaptation: The Role of a Vietnamese Heritage Language School. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9(2), 255–273.Google Scholar
Mar-Molinero, C. 2018. Language Issues for US-raised ‘Returnees’ in Mexico. In Potowski, K. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish as a Heritage Language. London: Routledge, 555–567.Google Scholar
Melo-Pfeifer, S. 2015. The Role of the Family in Heritage Language Use and Learning: Impact on Heritage Language Policies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18(1), 26–44.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2011. Spanish Heritage Speakers: Bridging Formal Linguistics, Psycholinguistics and Pedagogy. Heritage Language Journal 8(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2015. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, E. 2014. “You Are Children But You Can Always Say …”: Hypothetical Direct Reported Speech and Child–Parent Relationships in a Heritage Language Classroom. Text & Talk 34(5), 591–621.Google Scholar
Moore, S. C., Fee, M., Ee, J., Wiley, T., Arias, M. B.. 2014. Exploring Bilingualism, Literacy, Employability and Income Levels among Latinos in the United States. In Callahan, R. and Gándara, P. (eds.), The Bilingual Advantage: Language, Literacy and the US Labor Market. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 45–76.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. 2006. Speech Community. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 3–22.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2015. A Sociolinguistic View of Null Subjects and VOT in Toronto Heritage Languages. Lingua 164, 309–327.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2016. Heritage Languages as New Dialects. In Côté, M.-H., Knooihuizen, R., and Nerbonne, J. (eds.), The Future of Dialects: Selected Papers from Methods in Dialectology XV. Berlin: Language Science, 15–34.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2018. Linguistic Attitudes and Contact Effects in Toronto’s Heritage Languages: A Variationist Sociolinguistic Investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4), 429–446.Google Scholar
Norton Peirce, B. 1995. Social Identity, Investment, and Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly 29(1), 9–31.Google Scholar
Nove, C. R. 2018. Social Predictors of Case Syncretism in New York Hasidic Yiddish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 24(2), 87–95.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, O. S., and Lee, J. H.. 2011. Practical and Theoretical Issues in the Study of Heritage Language Acquisition. Heritage Language Journal 8(3), 315–332.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S. and Au, T. K.. 2005. Learning Spanish As a Heritage Language: The Role of Sociocultural Background Variables. Language, Culture and Curriculum 18(3), 229–241.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S. and Nash, B. A.. 2014. Attitudes and Motivations of Adult Spanish Language Learners: A Comparison of Heritage Language Learners and Second Language Learners. Heritage Language Journal 11(1), 29–44.Google Scholar
Okubo, Y. 2010. Heritage: Owned or Assigned? The Cultural Politics of Teaching Heritage Language in Osaka, Japan. Critical Asian Studies 42(1), 111–138.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2020. The Study of Heritage Language Development from a Bilingualism and Social Justice Perspective. Language Learning 70(S1), 15–53.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R. 2016. The Linguistic Competence of Second-Generation Bilinguals: A Critique of ‘Incomplete Acquisition’. In Tortora, C., den Dikken, M., Montoya, I., and O’Neill, T. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2013. Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 301–319.Google Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D. (ed.) 2016. Advances in Spanish as a Heritage Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pégram, S. 2005. Being Ourselves: Immigrant Culture and Self-identification among Young Haitians in Montreal. Ethnic Studies Review 28(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Peña, S. 2013. ¡Oye loca! From the Mariel Boatlift to Gay Cuban Miami. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Kagan, O.. 2007. Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom. Languages and Linguistics Compass 1(5), 368–395.Google Scholar
Potowski, K. 2016. Inter-Latino Language and Identity: MexiRicans. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preece, S. 2008. Multilingual Gendered Identities: Female Undergraduate Students in London Talk about Heritage Languages. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 7(1), 41–60.Google Scholar
Pu, C. 2012. Community-based Heritage Language Schools: A Chinese Example. Kappa Delta Pi Record 48(1), 29–34.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. and Sánchez, L.. 2013. What’s So Incomplete about Incomplete Acquisition? A Prolegomenon to Modeling Heritage Language Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(4), 478–508.Google Scholar
Rao, R. 2015. Manifestations of /bdg/ in Heritage Speakers of Spanish. Heritage Language Journal 12(1), 48–74.Google Scholar
Roman, D., Pastor, A., and Basaraba, D.. 2019. Internal Linguistic Discrimination: A Survey of Bilingual Teachers’ Language Attitudes toward Their Heritage Students’ Spanish. Bilingual Research Journal 42(1), 6–30.Google Scholar
Ronquest, R. 2016. Stylistic Variation in Heritage Spanish Vowel Production. Heritage Language Journal 13(2), 275–297.Google Scholar
Rosa, J. 2018. Looking Like a Language, Sounding Like a Race. Raciolinguistic Ideologies and the Learning of Latinidad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez, R. 1983. Chicano Discourse. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schilling, N. 2011. Language, Gender, and Sexuality. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218–237.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., Nir, B., Leiken, M., Levie, R., and Ravid, D.. 2014. The Acquisition of Noun Plurals among Early Sequential Russian-Hebrew Speaking Bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal 11(2), 151–185.Google Scholar
Seal, C. A. 2017. Positive and Negative Identity Practices in Heritage Language Education. International Journal of Multilingualism 15(4), 329–348.Google Scholar
Shin, S. J. 2010. “What about Me? I’m Not Like Chinese but I’m Not Like American”: Heritage-Language Learning and Identity of Mixed-Heritage Adults. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 9(3), 203–219.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 1994. Language Contact and Change. Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 2014. Bilingual Language Acquisition: Spanish and English in the First Six Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1998. Contemporary Transformations of Local Linguistic Communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 27, 401–426.Google Scholar
Skura, S. and Dean-Olmsted, E. M.. 2018. Jewish Spanish in Mexico City and Buenos Aires. In Hary, B. and Benor, S. (eds.), Languages in Jewish Communities, Past and Present. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 383–413.Google Scholar
Smith, L. 2008. Heritage, Gender and Identity. In Graham, B. and Howard, P. (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity. Farnham: Ashgate, 159–179.Google Scholar
Stanford, J. N. and Preston, D. (eds.) 2009. Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stroud, C. and Heugh, K.. 2011. Language in Education. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 413–429.Google Scholar
Swain, M. 1985. Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In Gass, S. and Madden, C. (eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235–253.Google Scholar
Szecsi, T. and Szilagyi, J.. 2012. Immigrant Hungarian Families’ Perceptions of New Media Technologies in the Transmission of Heritage Language and Culture. Language, Culture and Curriculum 25(3), 265–281.Google Scholar
Tamošiūnaitė, A. 2013. Lithuanian Saturday Schools in Chicago: Student Proficiency, Generational Shift, and Community Involvement. Heritage Language Journal 10(1), 108–133.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, M. and Abugov, N.. 2010. The Legacy of the Linguistic Fence: Linguistic Patterns among Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Girls. Heritage Language Journal 7(1), 74–90.Google Scholar
Tomiyama, M. 2008. Age and Proficiency in L2 Attrition: Data from Two Siblings. Applied Linguistics 30(2), 253–275.Google Scholar
Torres, L. 2016. Building a Translengua in Latina Lesbian Organizing. The Journal of Lesbian Studies 21(3), 272–288.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Urciuoli, B. 1996. Exposing Prejudice: Puerto Rican Experiences of Language, Race, and Class. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Urciuoli, B. 2008. Whose Spanish? The Tension between Linguistic Correctness and Cultural Identity. In Niño-Murcia, M. and Rothman, J. (eds.), Bilingualism and Identity: Spanish at the Crossroads with other Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–277.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. 1978. A Comprehensive Approach to the Teaching of Spanish to Bilingual Spanish-Speaking Students. Modern Language Journal 62(3), 102–110.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. and Geoffrion-Vinci, M.. 1998. Chicano Spanish: The Problem of the ‘Underdeveloped’ Code in Bilingual Repertoires. Modern Language Journal 82(4), 473–501.Google Scholar
Vilar Sánchez, K. 2003. La remigración en la adolescencia. Aspectos sociolingüísticos, psicológicos y sociolaborales. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Villa, D. and Rivera-Mills, S.. 2009. An Integrated Multi-generational Model for Language Maintenance and Shift: The Case of Spanish in the Southwest. Spanish in Context 6(1), 26–42.Google Scholar
Weekly, R. 2018. Attitudes, beliefs and responsibility for heritage language maintenance in the UK. Current Issues in Language Planning. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1554324Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Willoughby, L. 2014. Meeting the Challenges of Heritage Language Education: Lessons from One School Community. Current Issue in Language Planning 15(3), 265–281.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A. and Schieffelin, B. B.. 1994. Language Ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23(1), 55–82.Google Scholar
Yazan, B. and Ali, I.. 2018. Family Language Policies in a Libyan Immigrant Family in the U.S.: Language and Religious Identity. Heritage Language Journal 15(3), 369–388.Google Scholar
Yeh, Y. C., Ho, H. J., and Chen, M. C.. 2015. Learning Vietnamese as a Heritage Language in Taiwan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 36(3), 255–265.Google Scholar
Zentella, A. C. 1995. The “Chiquita-fication” of U.S. Latinos and Their Languages, or Why We Need an Anthro-political Linguistics. SALSA III: The Proceedings of the Symposium about Language and Society at Austin (1–18). Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Zentella, A. C. 1997. Growing Up Bilingual. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zentella, A. C. 2014. TWB (Talking While Bilingual): Linguistic Profiling of Latin@s, and other Linguistic Torquemadas. Latino Studies 12(4), 620–635.Google Scholar
Zéphir, F. 1997. The Social Value of French for Bilingual Haitian Immigrants. The French Review 70(3), 395–406.Google Scholar
Zhang, D. 2012. Co-ethnic Network, Social Class, and Heritage Language Maintenance among Chinese Immigrant Families. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 11(3), 200–223.Google Scholar

References

Albirini, A. and Benmamoun, E.. 2015. Factors Affecting the Retention of Sentential Negation in Heritage Egyptian Arabic. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(3), 470–489.Google Scholar
Arslan, S., Bastiaanse, R., and Felser, C.. 2015. Looking at Evidence in Visual World: Eye-movements Reveal How Bilingual and Monolingual Turkish Speakers Process Grammatical Evidentiality. Frontiers in Psychology 6, Art. 1387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01387Google Scholar
Basnight-Brown, D. M. and Altarriba, J.. 2007. Differences in Semantic and Translation Priming across Languages: The Role of Language Direction and Language Dominance. Memory and Cognition 35(5), 953–965.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 46, 129–181.Google Scholar
Bianchi, J. 2013. Gender in Italian-German Bilinguals: A comparison with German L2 Learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(3), 538–557.Google Scholar
Canseco-González, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., Wagner, K.. 2010. Carpet or Cárcel: The Effect of Age of Acquisition and Language Mode on Bilingual Lexical Access. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(5), 669–705.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. 2016. Bilingual Perceptual Benefits of Experience with a Heritage Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(4), 791–809.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., Haynes, E. F., Yao, Y., and Rhodes, R.. 2009. A Tale of Five Fricatives: Consonantal Contrast in Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15, 37–43.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., Haynes, E. F., Yao, Y., and Rhodes, R.. 2010. The Phonetic Space of Phonological Categories in Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. In Bane, M., Bueno, J., Grano, T., Grotberg, A., and McNabb, Y. (eds.), Proceedings from the 44th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: The Main Session. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 31–45.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., Haynes, E. F., Yao, Y., and Rhodes, R.. 2011. Production of Phonetic and Phonological Contrast by Heritage Speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129(6), 3964–3980.Google Scholar
Chung, E. S. 2018. Second and Heritage Language Acquisition of Korean Case Drop. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(1), 63–79.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., and Silva, R.. 2010. Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing. Language Learning 60, 21–43.Google Scholar
Cunnings, I. 2017. Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(4), 659–678.Google Scholar
Cuza, A. 2012. Cross-Linguistic Influence at the Syntax Proper: Interrogative Subject-Verb Inversion in Heritage Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 17(1), 71–96.Google Scholar
Davis, C., Sánchez-Casas, R., Garcia-Albea, J. E., Guasch, M., Molero, M., and Ferré, P.. 2010. Masked Translation Priming: Varying Language Experience and Word Type with Spanish–English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(2), 137–155.Google Scholar
Dragoy, O., Virfel, E., Yurchenko, A., and Bastiaanse, R.. 2019. Aspect and Tense Attrition in Russian-German Bilingual Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 23(1), 275–295.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E. 2003. Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in Second Language Learners: Some Effects of Bilinguality on L1 and L2 Processing Strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25, 529–557.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E. and Sagarra, N.. 2007. The Effect of Exposure on Parsing in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10, 101–116.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. and Fodor, J. D.. 1978. The Sausage Machine: A New Two-Stage Parsing Model. Cognition 6(4), 291–325.Google Scholar
Fukuda, S. 2017. Floating Numeral Quantifiers as an Unaccusative Diagnostic in Native, Heritage, and L2 Japanese Speakers. Language Acquisition 24(3), 169–208.Google Scholar
Godson, L. 2004. Vowel Production in the Speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. Heritage Language Journal 2, 44–69.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., and Sandoval, T. C.. 2008. More Use Almost Always Means a Smaller Frequency Effect: Aging, Bilingualism, and the Weaker Links Hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 787–814.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Schotter, E. R., Gomez, J., Murillo, M., and Rayner, K.. 2014. Multiple Levels of Bilingual Language Control: Evidence from Language Intrusions in Reading Aloud. Psychological Science 25, 585–595.Google Scholar
Gor, K. 2014. Raspberry, Not a Car: Context Predictability and a Phonological Advantage in Early and Late Learners’ Processing of Speech in Noise. Frontiers in Psychology 5, Art. 1449.Google Scholar
Gor, K. 2018. Yes to the King, and No To the ship: Heritage Speakers Differ from Late Second Language Learners in Word Recognition. In Kresin, S. and Baukus, S. (eds.), Connecting across Languages and Cultures: A Heritage Language Festschrift in Honor of Olga Kagan. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, 163–172.Google Scholar
Gor, K. and Cook, S.. 2010. Nonnative Processing of Verbal Morphology: In Search of Regularity. Language Learning 60(1), 88–126.Google Scholar
Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., and Cook, S.. 2018. Early and Late Learners Decompose Inflected Nouns, but Can They Tell Which Ones Are Inflected Correctly? Journal of Second Language Studies 1, 113–147.Google Scholar
Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., and Cook, S.. 2019. A Case for Agreement: Processing of Case Inflection by Early and Late Learners. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(1), 6–41.Google Scholar
Grinstead, J. 2010. Linguistic Interfaces and Child Spanish. In Domínguez, L. and Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Romance Turn 3. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 189–218.Google Scholar
Hoot, B. 2017. Narrow Presentational Focus in Heritage Spanish and the Syntax–Discourse Interface. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7, 63–95.Google Scholar
Hoot, B. 2019. Focus in Heritage Hungarian. Language Acquisition 26(1), 46–72.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. 2017. Individual Differences in L2 Parsing and Lexical Representations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(4), 689–690.Google Scholar
Hrycyna, M., Lapinskaya, N., Kochetoz, A., and Nagy, N.. 2011. VOT Drift in 3 Generations of Heritage Language Speakers in Toronto. Canadian Acoustics 39, 166–167.Google Scholar
Hulsen, M. 2000. Language Loss and Language Processing: Three Generations of Dutch Migrants in New Zealand. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Jacob, G. and Kirkici, B.. 2016. The Processing of Morphologically Complex Words in a Specific Speaker Group: A Masked-priming Study with Turkish Heritage Speakers. The Mental Lexicon 11(2), 308.Google Scholar
Jacob, G., Safak, D. F., Demir, O., and Kikici, B.. 2019. Preserved Morphological Processing in Heritage Speakers: A Masked Priming Study on Turkish. Second Language Research 35(2), 173–194.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. 2018a. Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Spanish as a Heritage Language. In Potowski, K. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Spanish as a Heritage/Minority Language. New York: Routledge, 221–234.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. 2018b. The Processing of the Object Marker a by Heritage Spanish Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(6), 585–602.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. 2018c. Sentence Processing in Spanish as a Heritage Language: Relative Clause Attachment in Early Bilinguals. Language Learning 68(3), 598–634.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. and Keating, G. D.. 2018, October. Processing Difficulty in Heritage Bilingual Sentence Comprehension: A Comparison of Self-Paced Reading and Eyetracking. Paper presented at the Bilingualism Forum, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. and VanPatten, B. (eds.) 2014. Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. and Sekerina, I. A.. 2020. The Processing of Input with Differential Object Marking by Heritage Spanish Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23(2), 274–282.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., Keating, G. D., and VanPatten, B.. 2016. On-line Relative Clause Attachment Strategy in Heritage Speakers of Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 20(3), 254–268.Google Scholar
Kaan, E. 2014. Predictive Sentence Processing in L2 and L2. What Is Different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4, 257–282.Google Scholar
Keating, G. D. and Jegerski, J.. 2015. Experimental Designs in Sentence Processing Research: A Methodological Review and User’s Guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
Keating, G. D., Jegerski, J., and VanPatten, B.. 2016. Online Processing of Subject Pronouns in Monolingual and Heritage Bilingual Speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(1), 36–49.Google Scholar
Kim, B. and Goodall, G.. 2016. Islands and Non-islands in Native and Heritage Korean. Frontiers in Psychology 7, Art. 134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00134Google Scholar
Kim, J.-Y. 2015. Perception and Production of Spanish Lexical Stress by Spanish Heritage Speakers and English L2 Learners of Spanish, In Willis, E., Martín Butragueño, P., and Herrera Zendejas, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 106–128.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2009. Binding Interpretation of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 16, 3–35.Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R. and Jaeger, T. F.. 2016. What Do We Mean by Prediction in Language Comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31(1), 32–59.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Belikova, A., Özçelik, Ö., Stangen, I., and White, L.. 2017. Restrictions on Definiteness in the Grammars of German-Turkish Heritage Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7, 1–32.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. 2011. Restructuring of Verbal Aspect in Heritage Russian: Beyond Lexicalization. International Journal of Language Studies 5(3), 13–26.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. 2018. What Is Difficult about Grammatical Gender? Evidence from Heritage Russian. Journal of Language Contact 11, 233–267.Google Scholar
Lee, T. 2011. Grammatical Knowledge of Korean Heritage Speakers. Early vs. Late Bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 149–174.Google Scholar
Lukyanchenko, A. and Gor, K.. 2011. Perceptual Correlates of Phonological Representations in Heritage Speakers and L2 Learners. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 414–426.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. 2007. Morphological Processes in Language Comprehension. In Gaskell, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–193.Google Scholar
Mikhaylova, A. 2018. Morphological Bottleneck: The Case of Russian Heritage Speakers. Journal of Language Contact 11, 268–303.Google Scholar
Momma, S. and Phillips, C.. 2018. The Relationship between Parsing and Generation. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 233–254.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2011. Morphological Errors in Spanish Second Language Learners and Heritage Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2), 155–161.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S, and Bowles, M.. 2009. Back to Basics: Differential Object Marking under Incomplete Acquisition in Spanish Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(4), 363–383.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Foote, R.. 2014. Age of Acquisition Interactions in Bilingual Lexical Access: A Study of the Weaker Language of L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers. The International Journal of Bilingualism 18(3), 274–303.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Ionin, T.. 2012. Dominant Language Transfer in Spanish Heritage Speakers and L2 Learners in the Interpretation of Definite Articles. The Modern Language Journal 96(1), 70–94.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatia, A., Bhatt, R., and Puri, V.. 2019. Case Marking in Hindi as a Weaker Language. Frontiers in Psychology 10, Art. 461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00461.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Davidson, J., de la Fuente, I., and Foote, R.. 2014. Early Language Experience Facilitates Gender Agreement Processing in Spanish Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(1), 118–138.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Schafer, A., Perla, J., Lee, O.-S., and Wieting, J.. 2009. A Psycholinguistic Tool for the Assessment of Language Loss: The HALA Project. Language Documentation and Conservation 3, 100–112.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W., Kwak, H.-Y., Lee, O.-S., and Lee, M.. 2011. An Emergentist Perspective on Heritage Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 223–245.Google Scholar
Orfitelly, R. and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Is It All Processing All the Way Down? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(3), 335–340.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. 2005. Aspect Lost, Aspect Regained. Restructuring of Aspectual Marking in American Russian. In Kempchinsky, P. and Slabakova, R. (eds.), Aspectual Inquiries. Berlin: Springer, 369–395.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. and Gambi, C.. 2018. Predicting While Comprehending Language: A Theory and Review. Psychological Bulletin 144(10), 1002–1044.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2008. Russian Gender under Incomplete Acquisition. Heritage Language Journal 6(1), 40–71.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2011. Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 305–328.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Kagan, O.. 2007. Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5), 368–395.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Scontras, G.. 2020. Understanding Heritage Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23, 4–20.Google Scholar
Ronai, E. 2018. Quantifier Scope in Heritage Bilinguals: A Comparative Experimental Study. In Hucklebidge, S. and Nelson, M. (eds.), NELS 48: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Vol. 2. 29–38. GLSA, 29–38.Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Polinsky, M., Tsai, C.-Y. E., and Mai, K.. 2017. Cross-Linguistic Scope Ambiguity: When Two Systems Meet. Glossa 2(1), 36, 1–28.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. A. and Sauermann, A.. 2015. Visual Attention and Quantifier-Spreading in Heritage Russian Bilinguals. Second Language Research 31(1), 75–104.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. A. and Trueswell, J. C.. 2011. Processing of Contrastiveness by Heritage Russian Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(3), 280–300.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. A., Fernández, E. M., and Clahsen, H. (eds.) 2008. Developmental Psycholinguistics: Online Methods in Children’s Language Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. 2015. Tense, Aspect, and Agreement in Heritage Labrador Inuttitut. Do Receptive Bilinguals Understand Functional Morphology? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1), 30–61.Google Scholar
Silverberg, S. and Samuel, A. G.. 2004. The Effect of Age of Second Language Acquisition on the Representation and Processing of Second Language Words. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 381–398.Google Scholar
White, L. 2011. Second Language Acquisition at the Interfaces. Lingua 121, 577–590.Google Scholar

References

Aalberse, S. and Moro, F. R.. 2014. Stability in Chinese and Malay Heritage Languages as a Source of Divergence. In Braunmüller, Kurt, Höder, Steffen, and Kühl, Karoline (eds.), Stability and Divergence in Language Contact. Factors and Mechanisms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 141–161.Google Scholar
Aalberse, S., Backus, A., and Myusken, P.. 2019. Heritage Languages: A Language Contact Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Abel, J. and Babel, M.. 2017. Cognitive Load Reduces Perceived Linguistic Convergence between Dyads. Language and Speech 60(3), 479–502.Google Scholar
Adamou, E. 2013. Replicating Spanish estar in Mexican Romani. Linguistics 51(6), 1075–1105.Google Scholar
Avineri, N. 2017. Contested Stance Practices in Secular Yiddish Metalinguistic Communities: Negotiating Closeness and Distance. Journal of Jewish Languages 5(2), 174–199.Google Scholar
Babel, A. (ed.) 2016. Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Babel, A. 2018. Between the Andes and the Amazon: Language and Social Meaning in Bolivia. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Backus, A. 2014. Towards a Usage-Based Account of Language Change: Implications of Contact Linguistics for Linguistic Theory. In Nicolaï, Robert (ed.), Questioning Language Contact. Leiden: Brill, 91–118.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39(3–4), 129–181.Google Scholar
Bruyn, A. 2009. Grammaticalization in Creoles: Ordinary and Not-so-ordinary Cases. Studies in Language 33(2), 312–337.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., and Pagliuca, W.. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, R. 2015. Null Subjects. In Fábregas, Antonio, Mateu, Jaume, and Putnam, Michael (eds.), Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. London: Bloomsbury Press, 201–226.Google Scholar
Dahl, O. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Doğruöz, A. S. and Backus, A.. 2009. Innovative Constructions in Dutch Turkish: An Assessment of Ongoing Contact-induced Change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1), 41–63.Google Scholar
Erker, D. 2017. The Limits of Named Language Varieties and the Role of Social Salience in Dialectal Contact: The Case of Spanish in the United States. Language and Linguistics Compass 11(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T.. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T.. 2010. Contact and Grammaticalization in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 86–105.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. F., and Walker, J. 2010. Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language variation and change 22 (1), 37–67.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C.. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irizarri von Schulten, P. 2016. Spanish as a Heritage Language in the Netherlands: A Cognitive Linguistic Exploration. PhD dissertation, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. and Gal, S.. 2000. Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. V. (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 35–83.Google Scholar
Jacob, G., Safak, D. F., Demir, O., and Kirkici, B.. 2019. Preserved Morphological Processing in Heritage Speakers: A Masked Priming Study on Turkish. Second Language Research 35(2), 173–194.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. and Larsson, I.. 2015. Complexity Matters: On Gender Agreement in Heritage Scandinavian. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1842.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. and Larsson, I.. 2018. Stability and Change in Grammatical Gender: Pronouns in Heritage Scandinavian. Journal of Language Contact 11(3), 441–480.Google Scholar
Kerswill, P. and Williams, A.. 2002. “Salience” as an Explanatory Factor in Language Change: Evidence from Dialect Levelling in Urban England. In Jones, M. and Esch, E. (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extra-linguistic Factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 81–110.Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y. 2019. Discrepancy between Heritage Speakers’ Use of Suprasegmental Cues in the Perception and Production of Spanish Lexical Stress. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–18.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J. and Doedens, W. J.. 2016. How Multiple Sources of Experience Influence Bilingual Syntactic Choice: Immediate and Cumulative Cross-language Effects of Structural Priming, Verb Bias, and Language Dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(4), 710–732.Google Scholar
Kootstra, G. J. and Muysken, P.. 2017. Cross-Linguistic Priming in Bilinguals: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language Processing, Acquisition, and Change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(2), 215–218.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, P. V. 2004. Language Ideologies. In Duranti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 496–517.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. and Rothman, J.. 2018. Terminology Matters! Why Difference Is Not Incompleteness and How Early Child Bilinguals Are Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5): 564–582.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Akpinar, D., and Stöhr, A.. 2013. Gender Assignment and Gender Agreement in Adult Bilinguals and Second Language Learners of French. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(2), 150–179.Google Scholar
Kusters, W. 2003. Linguistic Complexity, the Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. 2018. What Is Difficult about Grammatical Gender? Evidence from Heritage Russian. Journal of Language Contact 11(2), 233–267.Google Scholar
Levon, E. and Buchstaller, I.. 2015. Perception, Cognition, and Linguistic Structure: The Effect of Linguistic Modularity and Cognitive Style on Sociolinguistic Processing. Language Variation and Change 27(3), 319–348.Google Scholar
Lively, S., Pisoni, D., Summers, V., and Bernacki, R.. 1993. Effects of Cognitive Workload on Speech Production: Acoustic Analyses and Perceptual Consequences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93(5), 2962–2973.Google Scholar
Loebell, H. and Bock, K.. 2003. Structural Priming across Languages. Linguistics 41(5), 791–824.Google Scholar
Lohndal, T. and Westergaard, M.. 2016. Grammatical Gender in American Norwegian Heritage Language: Stability or Attrition? Frontiers in Psychology 7, 344.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. and Yip, V.. 2009. Contact-induced Grammaticalization: Evidence from Bilingual Acquisition. Studies in Language 33(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 2009. Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. and Sakel, J.. 2007. Investigating the Mechanisms of Pattern Replication in Language Convergence. Studies in Language 31(4), 829–865.Google Scholar
Mayr, R., Morris, J., Mennen, I., and Williams, R.. 2017. Disentangling the Effects of Long-term Language Contact and Individual Bilingualism: The Case of Monophthongs in Welsh and English. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(3), 245–267.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. 2001. The World’s Simplest Grammars Are Creole Grammars. Linguistic Typology 5(2–3), 125–166.Google Scholar
Miestamo, M. 2008. Grammatical Complexity in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. In Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K., and Karlsson, F. (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 23–41.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2004. Subject and Object Expression in Spanish Heritage Speakers: A Case of Morphosyntactic Convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2), 125–142.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2009. Knowledge of Tense-Aspect and Mood in Spanish Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 239–269.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2018. Heritage Language Development: Connecting the Dots. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5), 530–546.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Perpiñán, S.. 2011. Assessing Differences and Similarities between Instructed Heritage Language Learners and L2 Learners in Their Knowledge of Spanish Tense-Aspect and Mood (TAM) Morphology. Heritage Language Journal 8(1), 90–133.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Sánchez-Walker, N.. 2013. Differential Object Marking in Child and Adult Spanish Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 20(2), 109–132.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., and Perpiñán, S.. 2008. Gender Agreement in Adult Second Language Learners and Spanish Heritage Speakers: The Effects of Age and Context of Acquisition. Language Learning 58(3), 503–553.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., de la Fuenta, I., Davidson, J., and Foote, R.. 2013. The Role of Experience in the Acquisition and Production of Diminutives and Gender in Spanish: Evidence from L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers. Second Language Research 29(1), 87–118.Google Scholar
Moro, F. R. 2017. Aspectual Distinctions in Dutch-Ambon Malay Bilingual Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 21(2), 178–193.Google Scholar
Moro, F. R. 2018. Divergence in Heritage Ambon Malay in the Netherlands: The Role of Social-Psychological Factors. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4), 395–411.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2018. Linguistic Attitudes and Contact Effects in Toronto’s Heritage Languages: A Variationist Sociolinguistic Investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4), 429–446.Google Scholar
Nance, C. 2020. Bilingual Language Exposure and the Peer Group: Acquiring Phonetics and Phonology in Gaelic Medium Education. International Journal of Bilingualism 24(2), 360–375.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H-Y., Lee, O.-S., and Lee, M.. 2011. An Emergentist Perspective on Heritage Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2), 223–245.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R. 2016. The Linguistic Competence of Second-Generation Bilinguals: A Critique of “Incomplete Acquisition.” In Tortora, C., den Dikken, M., Montoya, I., and O'Neill, T. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 301–329.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R. and Zentella, A. C.. 2012. Spanish in New York: Language Contact, Dialectal Leveling, and Structural Continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2008. Russian Gender under Incomplete Acquisition. The Heritage Language Journal 6(1), 40–71.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. and Levey, S.. 2010. Contact-Induced Grammatical Change: A Cautionary Tale. In Auer, Peter and Enrich Schmidt, Jürgen (eds.), Language and Space – An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation: Volume 1 – Theories and Methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 391–419.Google Scholar
Preston, D. 2004. Three Kinds of Sociolinguistics: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. In Fought, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections. New York: Oxford University Press, 140–158.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. T. and Sánchez, L.. 2013. What’s So Incomplete about Incomplete Acquisition?: A Prolegomenon to Modeling Heritage Language Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(4), 478–508.Google Scholar
Rácz, P. 2013. Salience in Sociolinguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E., Vryenkova, A., and Polinsky, M.. 2016. Linguistic Creativity in Heritage Speakers. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Rehbein, J. and Karakoç, B.. 2004. On Contact-induced Change of Turkish Aspects: Languaging in Bilingual Discourse. In Dabelsteen, Christine and Jogersen, Normann (eds.), Languaging and Language Practices (Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism 36). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, 125–149.Google Scholar
Rodina, Y. and Westergaard, M.. 2017. Grammatical Gender in Bilingual Norwegian-Russian Acquisition: The Role of Input and Transparency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(1), 197–214.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. 2017. Reexamining Differential Object Marking as a Linguistic Contact-phenomenon in Gernika Basque. Journal of Language Contact 10(2), 318–352.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. 2019. The Role of Linguistic Ideologies in Language Contact Situations. Language and Linguistic Compass: e12351.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. (2021). The Role of Social Meaning in Contact-Induced Variation among New Speakers of Basque. Journal of Sociolinguistics [Online first].Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. and Sainzmaza-Lacanda, L.. 2018. Bilingualism Effects in Basque Subject Pronoun Expression: Evidence from L2 Basque. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8(5), 523–560.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. 2002. Linguistic Outcomes of Language Contact. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 338–368.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. and Köpke, B.. 2017. The Relevance of First Language Attrition To Theories of Bilingual Development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7(6), 637–667.Google Scholar
Schwenter, S. 2014. Two Kinds of Differential Object Marking in Portuguese and Spanish. In Amaral, P. and Carvalho, A. M. (eds.), Portuguese–Spanish Interfaces: Diachrony, Synchrony and Contact. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 237–260.Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Fuchs, M., and Polinsky, M.. 2015. Heritage Language and Linguistic Theory. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1545.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. and Sankaran, L.. 2011. Cognitive and Social Forces in Dialect Shift: Gradual Change in London Asian Speech. Language Variation and Change 23(3), 399–428.Google Scholar
Shin, N. 2014. Grammatical Complexification in Spanish in New York: 3sg Pronoun Expression and Verbal Morphology. Language Variation and Change 26(3), 303–330.Google Scholar
Showstack, R. 2017. Stancetaking and Language Ideologies in Heritage Language Learner Classroom Discourse. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 16(5), 271–294.Google Scholar
Siegel, J. 2008. The Emergence of Pidgins and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 1986. Bilingualism and Language Change: The Extension of estar in Los Angeles Spanish. Language 62, 587–608.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 2008. The Limits of Convergence in Language Contact. Journal of Language Contact 2(1), 213–224.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 2014. Bilingual Language Acquisition Spanish and English in the First Six Years (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sodaci, H., Backus, A., and Kootstra, G. J.. 2019. Role of Structural Priming in Contact-Induced Change: Subject Pronoun Expression in L1 Turkish by Turkish-Dutch Bilinguals. PsyArchiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2uxejGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. 2011. Pinning Down the Concept of “Interface” in Bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
Szeto, P. Y., Matthews, S., and Yip, V.. 2017. Multiple Correspondence and Typological Convergence in Contact-Induced Grammaticalization: Evidence from Cantonese-English Bilingual Development. Journal of Language Contact 10(3), 485–518.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G. and Kaufman, T.. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Torres-Cacoullos, R. 2000. Grammaticization, Synchronic Variation, and Language Contact. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Torres-Cacoullos, R. and Travis, C.. 2018. Bilingualism in the Community: Code-switching and Grammars in Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. 2000. Introduction. Spanish for Native Speakers, Volume I. AATSP Professional Development Series Handbook for teachers K-16. New York: Harcourt College, 1–20.Google Scholar
Vergara-Wilson, D. and Dumont, J.. 2015. The Emergent Grammar of Bilinguals: The Spanish Verb hacer ‘do’ with a Bare English Infinitive. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(4), 444–458.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Yager, L., Hellmold, N., Joo, H-A., Putnam, M., Rossi, E., Stafford, C., and Salmons, J.. 2015. New Structural Patterns in Moribund Grammar: Case Marking in Heritage German. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1716.Google Scholar
Zenner, E., Backus, A., and Winter-Froemel, E. (eds.) 2019. Cognitive Contact Linguistics: Placing Usage, Meaning and Mind at the Core of Contact-Induced Variation and Change. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Zyzik, E. 2019. Creativity and Conventionality in Heritage Speaker Bilingualism. Language Learning 70(1), 157–187.Google Scholar

References

Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M.. 1994. Ethnography and Participant Observation. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 248–261.Google Scholar
Avineri, N. 2014. Yiddish: A Jewish Language in the Diaspora. In Wiley, T., Kreeft-Peyton, J., Christian, D., Moore, S. K., and Liu, N. (eds.), Handbook of Heritage, Community, and Native American Languages in the United States: Research, Educational Practice, and Policy. New York: Routledge, 263–271.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. 1980. An Introspective Analysis of an Individual’s Language Learning Experience. In Scarcella, R. and Krashen, S. (eds.), Research on Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 58–65.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, G. 2015. Narrative Knowledging in Second Language Teaching and Learning Contexts. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 97–115.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., and Chik, A.. 2013. Narrative Inquiry in Language Teaching and Learning Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, S. 1988. Becoming a Political Woman: The Reconstruction and Interpretation of Experience through Stories. In Todd, A. D. and Fisher, S. (eds.), Gender and Discourse: The Power of Talk. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 97–123.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Silvina, M., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39(3–4), 129–181.Google Scholar
Benson, P. 2014. Narrative Inquiry in Applied Linguistics Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34, 154–170.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. and Creese, A.. 2008. Contesting ‘Language’ as ‘Heritage’: Negotiation of Identities in Late Modernity. Applied Linguistics 29(4), 533–554.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. 1986. Learning How to Ask. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. 1991. The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry 18(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. 2013. Reconstructing Heritage Language: Resolving Dilemmas in Language Maintenance for Sri Lankan Tamil Migrants. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 222, 131–155.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. 1988. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Choi, J. 2017. Creating a Multivocal Self: Autoethnography as Method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Copland, F. and Creese, A., with Rock, F. and Shaw, S. E.. 2015 Linguistic Ethnography: Collecting, Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Daiute, C. and Lightfoot, C. (eds.) 2004. Narrative Analysis: Studying the Development of Individuals in Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. 1982. The Story of Grammars and the Grammar of Stories. Journal of Pragmatics 6(5–6), 383–422.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. 2007. Code-switching and the Construction of Ethnic Identity in a Community of Practice. Language in Society 36, 371–392.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.) 2015. The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. 1989. Interpretive Biography. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duff, P. 2021. Ethnographic Research in Applied Linguistics: Exploring Language Teaching, Learning, and Use in Diverse Communities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duff, P., Anderson, T., Ilnyckyj, R., van Gaya, E., Wang, R. T., and Yates, E.. 2013. Learning Chinese. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. (eds.) 2011. The Handbook of Language Socialization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fader, A. 2009. Mitzvah Girls. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fader, A. 2011. Language Socialization and Morality. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization. Oxford: Blackwell, 321–340.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis. In Jarvella, R. J. and Klein, W. (eds.), Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 31–59.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. 1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 1990. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 1979. Language Shift: Social Determinants of Linguistic Change in Bilingual Australia. San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
García, O., Zakharia, Z., and Otcu, B. (eds.) 2012. Bilingual Community Education and Multilingualism: Beyond Heritage Languages in a Global City. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. 1985. Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2006. Toward an Identity-based Model for the Development of Chinese As a Heritage Language. The Heritage Language Journal 4(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2010. The Heart of Heritage: Sociocultural Dimensions of Heritage Language Learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30, 66–82.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2011. Heritage Language Socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization. Oxford: Blackwell, 587–609.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2013a. Language of the Heart and Heritage: A Tangled Tale. Plenary Address Delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL). March 16–19, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2013b. The Wor(L)D Is a Collage: Multi-performance by Chinese Heritage Language Speakers. The Modern Language Journal 97(2), 304–317.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2014. Heritage Language Development and Identity Construction throughout the Life Cycle. In Wiley, T. G., Peyton, J. K., Christian, D., Moore, S. C. K., and Liu, N. (eds.), Handbook of Heritage, Community, and Native American Languages in the United States: Research, Policy, and Educational Practice. New York: Routledge, 324–332.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2015. Chinese as a Heritage Language. In Wang, W. and Sun, C. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 578–589.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2016. Heritage Language Learning and Socialization. In Duff, P. A. and May, S. (eds.), Language Socialization, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02327-4-14-1Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. 1983. Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F.. 2000a. Constructing the Life Course. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F.. 2000b. The Self We Live by: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. 2004. The Continua of Biliteracy and the Bilingual Educator: Educational Linguistics in Practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7(2–3), 155–171.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1964. The Ethnography of Communication. American Anthropologist 66, 6–56.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1972. What Is Ethnography? in Gilmore, P. and Glatthorn, A. A. (eds.), Children In and Out of School: Ethnography and Education. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics, 21–32.Google Scholar
Kellman, S. G. 2000. The Translingual Imagination. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Klein, W. 2013. Heritage Language Socialization and Language Ideologies in a Sikh Education Program. Heritage Language Journal 10(1), 36–50.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. 2010. The Multilingual Subject. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, D. 1997. Language Shift and Cultural Reproduction: Socialization, Self and Syncretism in a Papua New Guinean Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax. In Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 354–396.Google Scholar
Labov, W. and Waletzky, J.. 1967. Narrative Analysis. In Helm, J. (ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44. Reprinted in Journal of Narrative and Life History 7, 3–38, 1997.Google Scholar
Li, Wei. 1994. Three Generations, Two Languages, One Family. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Li, Wei. 2011. Moment Analysis and Translanguaging Space. Journal of Pragmatics 43(5), 1222–1235.Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, J. and Varro, G.. 2008. Language Maintenance among Fortunate Immigrants: The French in the United States and Americans in France. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 189, 115–131.Google Scholar
Lo, A. 2004. Evidentiality and Morality in a Korean Heritage Language School. Pragmatics 14(2–3), 235–256.Google Scholar
Longhini, A. 2002. Focusing on Learning Styles and Strategies: A Diary Study in an Immersion Setting. Language Learning 52, 401–438.Google Scholar
Makihara, M. and Schieffelin, B. (eds.) 2007. Consequences of Contact. Oxford: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
Markee, N. 2008. Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 1–24.Google Scholar
McKay, S. L. and Wong, S. C.. 1996. Multiple Discourses, Multiple Identities. Harvard Educational Review 66(3), 577–608.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 2016. A Cost-and-Benefit Approach to Language Loss. In Filipović, L. and Pütz, M. (eds.), Endangered languages and languages in Danger. New York: John Benjamins, 115–143.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 2017. Language Vitality: Weak Theoretical Underpinnings of What Can Be an Exciting Research Area. Language (Perspectives, February 2017).Google Scholar
Niles, J. D. 1999. Homo Narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Norton, B. 2013. Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B.. 2008. Language Socialization: An Historical Overview. In Duff, P. and Hornberger, N. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 8, Language Socialization. New York: Springer, 3–15.Google Scholar
Ortega, L. 2005. For What and for Whom Is Our Research? The Ethical As Transformative Lens in Instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal 89(3), 427–443.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. 2007. Autobiographic Narratives as Data in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 28(2), 163–188.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 2010 Language as a Local Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. 1989. Telling the American Story. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, D. 1988. Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Potowski, K. 2013. Language Maintenance and Shift. In Bayley, R., Cameron, R., and Lucas, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0016Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 2006 Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riessman, C. K. 1993. Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rumbaut, R. G. and Massey, D. S.. 2014. Immigration and Language Diversity in the United States. Daedalus 2013 Summer 142(3), 141–154. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092008/Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures 1–8, Part IV, Spring 1970. In Jefferson, G. (ed.), Lectures on Conversation. Vol. II, Harvey Sacks. Oxford: Blackwell, 215–288.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. 1980. Introduction. In Sankoff, G. (ed.), The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, ix–xxii.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. 2001. Linguistic Outcomes of Language Contact. In Peter, Trudgill, Chambers, J., and Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 638–668.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. and Ochs, E. (eds.) 1986. Language Socialization across Cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. and Ochs, E.. 1996. The Microgenesis of Competence. In Slobin, D., Gerhardt, J., Kyratzis, A., and Guo, J. (eds.), Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 251–264.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. 1986. Research on the Acculturation Model for Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Multiligual and Multicultural Development 7, 379–392Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.. 1981. Narrative, Literacy and Face in Interethnic Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Simon-Maeda, A. 2011. Being and Becoming a Speaker of Japanese: An Autobiographic Account. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tan, E. K. 2017. A Rhizomatic Account of Heritage Language. In Canagarajah, S. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language. New York: Routeledge, 468–485.Google Scholar
Tedlock, B. 1991. From Participant Observation to the Observation of Participation: The Emergence of Narrative Ethnography. Journal of Anthropological Research 47, 69–94.Google Scholar
Tedlock, B. 2004. Narrative Ethnography as Social Science Discourse. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 27, 23–31.Google Scholar
Tsu, J. 2010. Sound and Script in Chinese Diaspora. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. 2001. Heritage Language Students. In Peyton, J. K., Ranard, D. A., and McGinnis, S. (eds.), Heritage Languages in America. Preserving a National Resource. McHenry, IL: CAL, 37–80.Google Scholar
Van Deusen-Scholl, N. 2003. Toward a Definition of Heritage Language: Sociopolitical and Pedagogical Considerations. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 2(3), 211–230.Google Scholar
Watson, C. 2007. Small Stories, Positioning Analysis, and the Doing of Professional Identities in Learning to Teach. Narrative Inquiry 17, 371–389.Google Scholar
Watson-Gegeo, K. A. 2004. Mind, Language, and Epistemology: Toward a Language Socialization Paradigm for SLA. The Modern Language Journal 88(3), 331–350.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. 2001. On Defining Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. In Peyton, J. K., Ranard, D. A., and McGinnis, S. (eds.), Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource. Washington, DC: Delta Systems/Center for Applied Linguistics, 29–36.Google Scholar
Wong, K. F. and Xiao, Y.. 2010. Diversity and Difference. Heritage Language Journal 7(2), 153–187.Google Scholar
Wong Fillmore, L. 1991. When Learning a Second Language Means Losing the First. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 6, 323–346.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. 2005. Socialization beyond the Speech Event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1), 95–112.Google Scholar
Yang, X. and Wong, K. F.. 2014. Exploring Heritage Language Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal 98(2), 589–611.Google Scholar
Zentella, A. C. 1997. Growing up Bilingual: Puerto Rican Children in New York. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zhu, H. 2008. Duelling Languages, Duelling Values: Codeswitching in Bilingual Intergenerational Conflict Talk in Diasporic Families. Journal of Pragmatics 40(10), 1799–1816.Google Scholar

References

Alsufieva, A., Kisselev, O., and Freels, S.. 2012. Results 2012: Using Flagship Data to Develop a Russian Learner Corpus of Academic Writing. Russian Language Journal 62, 79–105.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. 2019. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from www.laurenceanthony.net/softwareGoogle Scholar
Apresjan, V. Yu. 2017. Russkie possessivnye konstrukcii s nulevym i vyraženynnym glagolom: pravila i ošibki [Russian Possessive Constructions with Null Predicate: Rules and Errors]. Russkij jazyk v naučnom osvesčenii [Russian Language in Light of Scientific Description] 33, 86–116.Google Scholar
Bannard, C. and Lieven, E.. 2012. Formulaic Language in L1 Acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 3–16.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. 2003. Concordancing and Corpus Analysis Using MP 2.2. Houston: Athelstan.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. 2005. Computer-Based Analyses of Learner Language. In Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. (eds.), Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–369.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. and Kemmer, S.. (eds.) 2000. Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Beaudrie, S. M. 2012. A Corpus-Based Study on the Misspellings of Spanish Heritage Learners and Their Implications for Teaching. Linguistics and Education 23(1), 135–144.Google Scholar
Biber, D. 1991. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Conrad, S.. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Conrad, S.. 2010. Corpus Linguistics and Grammar Teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Vásquez, C.. 2009. Writing and Speaking. In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. London and New York: Taylor and Francis, 657–672.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Leech, G.. 2002. The Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R.. 2004. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M.. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Centre for English Corpus Linguistics. 2019. Learner Corpora around the World. Retrieved May 2, 2019, from https://uclouvain.be/en/research-institutes/ilc/cecl/learner-corpora-around-the-world.htmlGoogle Scholar
Conrad, S. 1999. The Importance of Corpus-Based Research for Language Teachers. System 27(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Conrad, S. and Biber, D.. 2009. Real Grammar: A Corpus-Based Approach to English. New York: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar
Cortes, V. 2013. The Purpose of This Study Is To: Connecting Lexical Bundles and Moves in Research Article Introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12, 33–43.Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. 2000. A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly 34(2), 213–238.Google Scholar
Dagneaux, E., Denness, S., and Granger, S.. 1998. Computer-Aided Error Analysis. System 26, 163–174.Google Scholar
Dubinina, I., Malamud, S. A., and Denisova-Schmidt, E.. 2013–present. Audio-aligned Longitudinal Corpus of Bilingual Russian Child and Child-directed Speech (BiRCh Longitudinal).Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. 2002. Frequency Effects in Language Processing: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2), 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. 2012. Formulaic Language and Second Language Acquisition: Zipf and the Phrasal Teddy Bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 17–44.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. 2017. Cognition, Corpora, and Computing: Triangulating Research in Usage‐Based Language Learning. Language Learning 67(S1), 40–65.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., and O’Donnell, M. B.. 2016. Usage-Based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar (The Language Learning Monograph Series). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. 2009. Constructing another Language: Usage-Based Linguistics in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(3), 335–357.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Cadierno, T.. 2007. Are Recurring Multi-Word Expressions Really Syntactic Freezes? Second Language Acquisition from the Perspective of Usage-Based Linguistics. Collocations and Idioms 1, 19–20.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. 2012. Corpora and Language Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. 2005. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalizations in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, S. 1996. From CA to CIA and Back: An Integrated Approach to Computerized Bilingual and Learner Corpora. In Aijmer, K., Altenberg, B., and Johansson, M. (eds.), Languages in Contrast. Papers from a Symposium on Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies. Lund 4–5 March 1994. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press, 37–51.Google Scholar
Granger, S. 1999. Use of Tenses by Advanced EFL Learners: Evidence from an Error-Tagged Computer Corpus. In Hasselgard, H. and Oksefjell, S. (eds.), Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 191–202.Google Scholar
Granger, S. 2004. Computer Learner Corpus Research: Current Status and Future Prospects. In Connor, U. and Upton, T. A. (eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective. Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi, 123–145.Google Scholar
Granger, S. 2009. The Contribution of Learner Corpora to Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. In Ajmer, K. (ed.), Corpora and Language Teaching. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1332.Google Scholar
Gries, S. 2009. What Is Corpus Linguistics? Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5), 1225–1241.Google Scholar
Gries, S. 2011. Methodological and Interdisciplinary Stance in Corpus Linguistics. In Barnbrook, G., Viana, V., and Zyngier, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics: Connections and Controversies. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 81–98.Google Scholar
Gries, S. and Wulff, S.. 2013. The Genitive Alternation in Chinese and German ESL Learners: Towards a Multifactorial Notion of Context in Learner Corpus Research. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3), 327–356.Google Scholar
He, A. W. and Xiao, Y. (eds.) 2008. Chinese as a Heritage Language: Fostering Rooted World Citizenry (Vol. 2). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Herbst, T., Schmid, H-J., and Faulhaber, S.. 2014. From Collocations and Patterns to Constructions: An Introduction. In Herbst, T., Schmid, H-J., and Faulhaber, S. (eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1–9.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinkel, E. 2001. Matters of Cohesion in L2 Academic Texts. Applied Language Learning 12 (2), 111–132.Google Scholar
Hunston, S. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iannozzi, M. 2015 Pro-drop in Faetar in Canada: A Study of a Heritage Language in Contact. Western Papers in Linguistics 1(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
Kisselev, O. and Alsufieva, A.. 2017. The Development of Syntactic Complexity in the Writing of Russian Language Learners: A Longitudinal Corpus Study. Russian Language Journal 67, 27–53.Google Scholar
Kisselev, O. and Furniss, E.. forthcoming. Corpus Linguistics and Russian Language Pedagogy. In Dengub, E., Dubinina, I., and Merill, J. (eds.) The Art of Teaching Russian. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 307–332.Google Scholar
Kisselev, O., Dubinina, I., and Polinsky, M.. 2020. Form-Focused Instruction in the Heritage Language Classroom: Toward Research-Informed Heritage Language Pedagogy. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5). Switzerland: Frontiers, 53.Google Scholar
Kopotev, M. 2008. Ispol’zovanie èlektronnyx korpusov v prepodavanii russkogo jazyka [The Use of Electronic Corpora in the Teaching of the Russian Language]. In Lindstedt, J. et al. (eds.), SLAVICA HELSINGIENSIA 35, S ljubov’ju k slovu, Festschrift in Honour of Professor Arto Mustajoki on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Helsinki, 110–118.Google Scholar
Kopotev, M. and Mustajoki, A.. 2008. Sovremennaja korpusnaja rusistika [Contemporary Corpus Linguistics]. In Mustajoki, A., Kopotev, M., Birjulin, L., and Protasova, Ju. (eds.), Instrumentarij rusistiki: Korpusnye podxody [Instruments for Russian Studies: Corpus Approaches]. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 7–24.Google Scholar
Kopotev, M., Kisselev, O., and Polinsky, M.. 2020. Lexical Strategies of Heritage Speakers: Collocations in Heritage Russian. In Halmari, H. and Backus, A. (eds.), Balancing Bilingualism: Linguistic Implications of Input Limitations. Special Issue for the International Journal of Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. and Taylor, A.. 2000. Verb–Object Order in Early Middle English. In Pintzuk, S., Tsoulas, G., and Warner, A. (eds.), Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 132–163.Google Scholar
Kroch, A., Santorini, B., and Delfs, L.. 2004. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, First Edition, Release 3 (www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche-release-2016/PPCEME-RELEASE-3).Google Scholar
Lee, S. H., Jang, S. B., and Seo, S. K.. 2009. Annotation of Korean Learner Corpora for Particle Error Detection. CALICO Journal 26(3), 529–544.Google Scholar
Leech, G. 1992. Corpora and Theories of Linguistic Performance, Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 105–122.Google Scholar
Leech, G. 2000. Grammars of Spoken English: New Outcomes of Corpus‐Oriented Research. Language Learning 50(4), 675–724.Google Scholar
Leech, G. 2005. Adding Linguistic Annotation. In Wynne, M. (ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 17–29.Google Scholar
Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W., and Cadierno, T.. 2014. Tracing an L2 Learner's Motion Constructions Over Time: A Usage‐Based Classroom Investigation. The Modern Language Journal 98(2), 612–628.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. and Tomasello, M.. 2008. Children's First Language Acquisition from a Usage-Based Perspective. In Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. C. (eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 168–196.Google Scholar
Lozano, C. and Mendikoetxea, A.. 2013. Learner Corpora and Second Language Acquisition. Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data 59, 65–100.Google Scholar
Lu, X., Yoon, J., and Kisselev, O.. 2018. A Phrase-Frame List for Social Science Research Article Introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36, 76–85.Google Scholar
Lüdeling, A., Hirschmann, H., and Shadrova, A.. 2017. Linguistic Models, Acquisition Theories, and Learner Corpora: Morphological Productivity in SLA Research Exemplified by Complex Verbs in German. Language Learning 67(S1), 96–129.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk: Transcription Format and Programs (3rd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Malamud, S. A., Dubinina, I., Lưu, A., and Xue, N.. 2017–present. Parsed and Audio-aligned Corpus of Bilingual Russian Child and Child-directed Speech (Parsed BiRCh).Google Scholar
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. and Hardie, A.. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R., and Tono, Y.. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ming, T. and Tao, H.. 2008. Developing a Chinese Heritage Language Corpus: Issues and a Preliminary Report. In He, A. W. and Xiao, Y. (eds.), Chinese as a Heritage Language: Fostering Rooted World Citizenry. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, 167–188.Google Scholar
Mizumoto, A., Hamatani, S., and Imao, Y.. 2017. Applying the Bundle–Move Connection Approach to the Development of an Online Writing Support Tool for Research Articles. Language Learning 67(4), 885–921.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2010. Current Issues in Heritage Language Acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30, 3–23.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myles, F. 2005. Interlanguage Corpora and Second Language Acquisition Research. Second Language Research 21(4), 373–391.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. and Lo, S.. 2019. Variation and Change in Heritage and Hong Kong Cantonese Classifiers Asia-Pacific Language Variation 1(5), 84–108.Google Scholar
Nagy, N., Iannozzi, M., and Heap, D.. 2018. Faetar Null Subjects: A Variationist Study of a Heritage Language in Contact. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 249.Google Scholar
Nagy, N., Aghdasi, N., Denis, D., and Motut, A.. 2011. Pro-drop in Heritage Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Contact-Induced Change. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 17, 2.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. 2005. Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Phildelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nesi, H., Sharpling, G., and Ganobcsik-Williams, L.. 2004. Student Papers across the Curriculum: Designing and Developing a Corpus of British Student Writing. Computers and Composition 21, 439–450.Google Scholar
Paquot, M. and Granger, S.. 2012. Formulaic Language in Learner Corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32(1), 130–149.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. and Snyder, F. H.. 1983. Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency. In Richards, J. C. and Schimdt, R. W. (eds.), Language and Communication. New York: Longman, 191–226.Google Scholar
Peirce, G. 2018. Representational and Processing Constraints on the Acquisition of Case and Gender by Heritage and L2 Learners of Russian: A Corpus Study. Heritage Language Journal 15(1), 95–111.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M., Kopotev, M., and Kisselev, O.. 2020. Heritage Language Data Repository. National Heritage Language Resource Center, UCLA https://international.ucla.edu/heladaGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P. E., Detmar, M., and McEnery, T.. 2017. Language Learning Research at the Intersection of Experimental, Computational and Corpus-Based Approaches. Language Learning 67(S1), 6–13.Google Scholar
Richards, J. A., Gilkerson, J., Paul, T., and Xu, D.. 2008. The LENATM Automatic Vocalization Assessment. LTR-08-1. Retrieved from www.lenafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LTR-08-1_Automatic_Vocalization_Assessment.pdfGoogle Scholar
Römer, U. 2011. Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31, 205–225.Google Scholar
Rosen, A., Hana, J., Štindlová, B., and Feldman, A.. 2014. Evaluating and Automating the Annotation of a Learner Corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation 48(1), 65–92.Google Scholar
Rozovskaya, A. and Roth, D.. 2014. Building a State-of-the-Art Grammatical Error Correction System. Transactions of American Computational Linguistics 2, 419–434.Google Scholar
Rozovskaya, A. and Roth, D.. 2019. Grammar Error Correction in Morphologically Rich Languages: The Case of Russian. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 7, 1–17.Google Scholar
Schlitz, S. 2010. Introduction to the Special Issue: Exploring Corpus-Informed Approaches to Writing Research. Journal of Writing Research 2(2), 91–98.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. and Schmitt, N.. 2005. Focus on Vocabulary: Mastering the Academic Word List. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2016. WordSmith Tools version 7 [Computer Program]. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. and Pintzuk, S.. 2012. Verb Order, Object Position and Information Status in Old English. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2, 29–52.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 2008. What Is Corpus Linguistics? What the Data Says. ICAME Journal 32, 179–200.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. and Barker, F.. 2008. Using Corpora in Language Assessment. In Shohamy, E. and Hornberger, N. H. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (2nd ed.): Volume 7: Language Testing and Assessment. New York: Springer, 241–254.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2003. The Key is Social Cognition. In Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press, 47–57.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R. and Bauman, J.. 2018. Allative to Purposive Grammaticalization: A Quantitative Story of Spanish Para. Studies in Historical Ibero-Romance Morpho-Syntax 16, 165.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R. and Berry, G. 2018. Language Variation in US Spanish: Social Factors. Potowski, K. (ed.), Handbook of Spanish as a Minority/Heritage Language. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., LaCasse, D., Johns, M., and De la Rosa Yacomelo, J.. 2017. El subjuntivo: hacia la rutinización. Moenia 23.Google Scholar
Tse, H. 2019. Beyond the Monolingual Core and out into the Wild: A Variationist Study of Early Bilingualism and Sound Change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Vyatkina, N. 2012. The Development of Second Language Writing Complexity in Groups and Individuals: A Longitudinal Learner Corpus Study. Modern Language Journal 96(4), 572–594.Google Scholar
Vyatkina, N. 2013. Discovery Learning and Teaching with Electronic Corpora in an Advanced German Grammar Course. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 46(1), 44–61.Google Scholar
Vyrenkova, A. S., Polinskaja, M. S., and Raxilina, E. V.. 2014. Grammatika ošibok i grammatika konstrukcij: “Èritažnyj” (“unasledovannyj”) russkij jazyk. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 3, 3–19.Google Scholar
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xiao-Desai, Y. and Wong, K. F.. 2017. Epistemic Stance in Chinese Heritage Language Writing: A Developmental View. Chinese as a Second Language Research 6(1), 73–102.Google Scholar
Yagunova, E. V. and Pivovarova, L. M.. 2014. Ot Kollokacij k Konstrukcijam [From Collocations to Constructs]. Saj, S. S., Ovsyannikova, M. A., and Oskol’skaja, S. A. (eds.), Russkij Yazyk: Grammatika Konstrukcij i Leksiko-Semnaticeskie Podkhody [Russian Language: Grammar of Constructions and Lexico-Semmatic Approaches]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 568–5617.Google Scholar
Yu, L. C., Lee, L. H., and Chang, L. P.. 2014, November. Overview of Grammatical Error Diagnosis for Learning Chinese As a Foreign Language. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Natural Language Processing Techniques for Educational Applications 42–47.Google Scholar
Zaghouani, W., Mohit, B., Habash, N., Obeid, O., Tomeh, N., Rozovskaya, A., Farra, N., Alkuhlani, S., and Oflazer, K.. 2014. Large Scale Arabic Error Annotation: Guidelines and Framework. Proceedings of LREC.Google Scholar

References

Alemán Bañón, J. and Rothman, J.. 2016. The Role of Morphological Markedness in the Processing of Number and Gender Agreement in Spanish: An Event-Related Potential Investigation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31, 1273–1298.Google Scholar
Alemán Bañón, J. and Rothman, J.. 2019. Being a Participant Matters: Event-Related Potentials Show That Markedness Modulates Person Agreement in Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 746.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. A., Mak, L., Chahi, A. K., and Bialystok, E.. 2018. The Language and Social Background Questionnaire: Assessing Degree of Bilingualism in a Diverse Population. Behavior Research Methods 50(1), 250–263.Google Scholar
Arslan, S., Bastiaanse, R., and Felser, C.. 2015. Looking at the Evidence in Visual World: Eye-Movements Reveal How Bilingual and Monolingual Turkish Speakers Process Grammatical Evidentiality. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1387.Google Scholar
Au, T. K. F., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S. A., and Oh, J. S.. 2002. Overhearing a Language during Childhood. Psychological Science 13(3), 238–243.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., and Bates, D. M.. 2008. Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 390–412.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., van Rij, J., de Cat, C., and Wood, S.. 2018. Autocorrelated Errors in Experimental Data in the Language Sciences: Some Solutions Offered by Generalized Additive Mixed Models. In Speelman, D., Heylen, K., and Geeraerts, D. (eds.), Mixed Effects Regression Models in Linguistics. Berlin: Springer, 49–69.Google Scholar
Bayram, F., Rothman, J., Iverson, M., Kupisch, T., Miller, D., Puig-Mayenco, E., and Westergaard, M.. 2017. Differences in Use without Deficiencies in Competence: Passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish Heritage Speakers in Germany. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–21.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. 2009. Bilingualism: The Good, the Bad, and the Indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
Bolger, P. A. and Zapata, G. C.. 2011. Psycholinguistic Approaches to Language Processing in Heritage Speakers. Heritage Language Journal 8(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Breslow, N. E. and Clayton, D. G.. 1993. Approximate Inference in Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(421), 9–25.Google Scholar
Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., and Bauckus, S. (eds.) 2017. Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Coupé, C. 2018. Modelling Linguistic Variables with Regression Models: Addressing Non-Gaussian Distributions, Non-independent Observations and Nonlinear Predictors with Random Effects and Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 513.Google Scholar
Cunnings, I. 2012. An Overview of Mixed-Effects Statistical Models for Second Language Researchers. Second Language Research 28(3), 369–382.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. 1990. The Acquisition of Two Languages from Birth: A Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. 1995. Bilingual Language Acquisition. In Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Child Language. Cambridge: Blackwell, 219–250.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. 2007. Parental Language Input Patterns and Children’s Bilingual Use. Applied Psycholinguistics 28(3), 411–424.Google Scholar
Demberg, V. and Keller, F.. 2008. Data from Eye-Tracking Corpora As Evidence for Theories of Syntactic Processing Complexity. Cognition 109(2), 193–210.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L., and White, L.. 1987. UG or not UG, That Is the Question: A Reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin (Utrecht) 3(1), 56–75.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E. 2010. Uses of Eye-Tracking Data in Second Language Sentence Processing Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30, 149–166.Google Scholar
Flores, C. and Rinke, E.. 2019. The Relevance of Language-Internal Variation in Predicting Heritage Language Grammars. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–2.Google Scholar
Foote, R. 2011. Integrated Knowledge of Agreement in Early and Late English–Spanish Bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics 32(1), 187–220.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. and Davis, C.. 1984. Repetition Priming and Frequency Attenuation in Lexical Access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10, 680–698.Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C. 2002. An On-line Look at Sentence Processing in the Second Language. In Heredia, R. R. and Altarriba, J. (eds.), Advances in Psychology: Vol. 134. Bilingual Sentence Processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science Publishers, 217–236.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Z. 2019. Gender in the Nominal Domain: Evidence From Bilingualism and Eye-Tracking. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gharibi, K. and Boers, F.. 2017. Influential Factors in Incomplete Acquisition and Attrition of Young Heritage Speakers’ Vocabulary Knowledge. Language Acquisition 24(1), 52–69.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. 2018. Mechanistic Formal Approaches to Language Acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8(6), 733–737.Google Scholar
Grüter, T. and Paradis, J. (eds.) 2014. Input and Experience in Bilingual Development. Vol. 13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T. 2017. Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. 2013. Child Second Language Acquisition from a Generative Perspective. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(1), 26–47.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. and Gavruseva, E. (eds.) 2008. Current Trends in Child Second Language Acquisition: A Generative Perspective. Vol. 46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Holmes, B. C. 2017. “I Understand Everything You Say, I Just Don’t Speak It”: The Role of Morphology in the Comprehension of Spanish by Receptive Heritage Bilinguals. PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., and Van de Weijer, J.. 2011. Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. 2013. Grammatical Gender in Adult L2 Acquisition: Relations between Lexical and Syntactic Variability. Second Language Research 29(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
Hopp, H., Putnam, M. T., and Vosburg, N.. 2019. Derivational Complexity vs. Transfer Effects: Long-Distance wh-Movement in Heritage and L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9(3), 341–375.Google Scholar
Isurin, L. and Ivanova-Sullivan, T.. 2008. Lost in between: The Case of Russian Heritage Speakers. Heritage Language Journal 6(1), 72–104.Google Scholar
Jacob, G. and Kırkıcı, B.. 2016. The Processing of Morphologically Complex Words in a Specific Speaker Group. The Mental Lexicon 11(2), 308–328.Google Scholar
Jacob, G., Şafak, D. F., Demir, O., and Kırkıcı, B.. 2019. Preserved Morphological Processing in Heritage Speakers: A Masked Priming Study on Turkish. Second Language Research 35(2), 173–194.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. 2008. Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (Transformation or not) and Towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 434–446.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. 2014. Self-Paced Reading. In Jegerski, J. and VanPatten, B. (eds.), Research Methods in Second Language Psycholinguistics. New York: Routledge, 20–49.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. 2018a. The Processing of the Object Marker a by Heritage Spanish Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(6), 585–602.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. 2018b. Sentence Processing in Spanish as a Heritage Language: A Self‐Paced Reading Study of Relative Clause Attachment. Language Learning 68(3), 598–634.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J. and Sekerina, I. A.. 2019. The Processing of Input with Differential Object Marking by Heritage Spanish Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–9.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. 2018. Factors of Variation, Maintenance and Change in Scandinavian Heritage Languages. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4), 447–465.Google Scholar
Keating, G. D., Jegerski, J., and Vanpatten, B.. 2016. Online Processing of Subject Pronouns in Monolingual and Heritage Bilingual Speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(1), 36–49.Google Scholar
Keating, G. D., VanPatten, B., and Jegerski, J.. 2011. Who Was Walking on the Beach? Anaphora Resolution in Spanish Heritage Speakers and Adult Second Language Learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2), 193–221.Google Scholar
Kırkıcı, B. and Clahsen, H.. 2013. Inflection and Derivation in Native and Non-native Language Processing: Masked Priming Experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(4), 776–791.Google Scholar
Kidd, E., Donnelly, S., and Christiansen, M. H.. 2018. Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22(2), 154–169.Google Scholar
Kim, K., O’Grady, W., and Schwartz, B. D.. 2018. Case in Heritage Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8(2), 252–282.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, S. and Lupker, S. J.. 2003. Masked Priming: State of the Art. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. 2006. The Acquisition of Determiners in Bilingual German-Italian and German-French Children. Doctoral dissertation, Hamburg University. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. and Rothman, J.. 2018. Terminology Matters! Why Difference Is Not Incompleteness and How Early Child Bilinguals Are Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(5), 564–582.Google Scholar
Lam, W. M. 2018. Perception of Lexical Tones by Homeland and Heritage Speakers of Cantonese. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Lee-Ellis, S. 2011. The Elicited Production of Korean Relative Clauses by Heritage Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(1), 57–89.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. 1967. The Biological Foundations of Language. Hospital Practice 2(12), 59–67.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Smith, A., Gyllstad, H., Kupisch, T., and Quaglia, S.. 2021. Heritage Language Proficiency Does not Predict Syntactic CLI into L3 English. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24(3), 435–451, DOI: HYPERLINK “https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1472208” 10.1080/13670050.2018.1472208.Google Scholar
Lohndal, T. and Westergaard, M.. 2016. Grammatical Gender in American Norwegian Heritage Language: Stability or Attrition? Frontiers in Psychology 7, 344.Google Scholar
Lohndal, T., Rothman, J., Kupisch, T., and Westergaard, M.. 2019. Heritage Language Acquisition: What It Reveals and Why It Is Important for Formal Linguistic Theories. Language and Linguistics Compass 13(12), 1–19Google Scholar
Luck, S. J. 2014. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marian, V. and Blumenfeld, H. K., and Kaushanskaya, M.. 2007. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 940–967.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, G., Phillips, L., Madsen II, C. N., and Schwartz, R. G.. 2017. Cross-Linguistic Influence in Bilingual Processing: An ERP Study. In Proceedings of the 41st Boston University Conference on Language Development. Vol. 2. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 452–465.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2004. The Bilingual Child. In Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell, 91–113.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2011. First and Second Language Acquisition: Parallels and Differences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., Barber, H. A., and Carreiras, M.. 2011. Grammatical Agreement Processing in Reading: ERP Findings and Future Directions. Cortex 47(8), 908–930.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2002. Incomplete Acquisition and Attrition of Spanish Tense/Aspect Distinctions in Adult Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5(1), 39–68.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2004. Subject and Object Expression in Spanish Heritage Speakers: A Case of Morphosyntactic Convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2), 125–142.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Vol. 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2011. Morphological Errors in Spanish Second Language Learners and Heritage Speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2), 163–192.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2012. Is the Heritage Language Like a Second Language? Eurosla Yearbook 12(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2014. Structural Changes in Spanish in the United States: Differential Object Marking in Spanish Heritage Speakers across Generations. Lingua 151, 177–196.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2015. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. A. and Bowles, M. A.. 2009. Back to Basics: Differential Object Marking under Incomplete Acquisition in Spanish Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism 12(3), 363–383.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Sánchez-Walker, N.. 2013. Differential Object Marking in Child and Adult Spanish Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 20(2), 109–132.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., and Perpiñán, S.. 2008. Gender Agreement in Adult Second Language Learners and Spanish Heritage Speakers: The Effects of Age and Context of Acquisition. Language Learning 58(3), 503–553.Google Scholar
Mora, C., Dousset, B., Caldwell, I. R., Powell, F. E., Geronimo, R. C., Bielecki, C. R., and Lucas, M. P.. 2017. Global Risk of Deadly Heat. Nature Climate Change 7(7), 501.Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E. and Montanari, S. (eds.) 2016. Bilingualism across the Lifespan: Factors Moderating Language Proficiency. Berlin: de Gruyter MoutonGoogle Scholar
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (2005). Arctic Sea Ice Continues to Decline, Arctic Temperatures Continue to Rise in 2005. Retrieved from www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2005/arcticice_decline.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. 2014. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parmesan, C. and Yohe, G.. 2003. A Globally Coherent Fingerprint of Climate Change Impacts across Natural Systems. Nature 421(6918), 37.Google Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D. 2020. Examining the Role of Cross-Generational Attrition in the Development of Spanish as a Heritage Language: Evidence from Gustar-Like Verbs. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10(1), 86–108.Google Scholar
Pires, A. and Rothman, J.. 2009. Disentangling Sources of Incomplete Acquisition: An Explanation for Competence Divergence across Heritage Grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 211–238.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2008. Gender under Incomplete Acquisition: Heritage Speakers’ Knowledge of Noun Categorization. Heritage Language Journal 6(1), 40–71.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2011. Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language: New Evidence in Support of Attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2), 305–328.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2015. When L1 Becomes an L3: Do Heritage Speakers Make Better L3 Learners? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(2), 163–178.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2016. Structure vs. Use in Heritage Language. Linguistics Vanguard 2(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Kagan, O.. 2007. Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5), 368–395.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. and Scontras, G.. 2020. Understanding Heritage Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4–20.Google Scholar
Pouplier, M., Cederbaum, J., Hoole, P., Marin, S., and Greven, S.. 2017. Mixed Modeling for Irregularly Sampled and Correlated Functional Data: Speech Science Applications. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142(2), 935–946.Google Scholar
Puig-Mayenco, E., Cunnings, I., Bayram, F., Miller, D., Tubau, S., and Rothman, J.. 2018. Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 1–16.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. T. and Sánchez, L.. 2013. What’s So Incomplete about Incomplete Acquisition? A Prolegomenon to Modeling Heritage Language Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(4), 478–508.Google Scholar
Quené, H. and Van den Bergh, H.. 2008. Examples of Mixed-Effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects and with Binomial Data. Journal of Memory and Language 59(4), 413–425.Google Scholar
Rayner, K. 1998. Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin 124(3), 372.Google Scholar
Rinke, E. and Flores, C.. 2014. Morphosyntactic Knowledge of Clitics by Portuguese Heritage Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(4), 681–699.Google Scholar
Rinke, E., Flores, C., and Barbosa, P.. 2018. Null Objects in the Spontaneous Speech of Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers of European Portuguese. Probus 30(1), 93–119.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., González Alonso, J., Pliatsikas, C., and Rothman, J.. 2018. Evidence from Neurolinguistic Methodologies: Can It Actually Inform Linguistic/Language Acquisition Theories and Translate to Evidence-Based Applications? Second Language Research 34(1), 125–143.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. 2007. Heritage Speaker Competence Differences, Language Change, and Input Type: Inflected Infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism 11(4), 359–389.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. 2009. Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 155–163.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. and Treffers-Daller, J.. 2014. A Prolegomenon to the Construct of the Native Speaker: Heritage Speaker Bilinguals Are Natives Too! Applied Linguistics 35(1), 93–98.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. and Karayayla, T.. 2020. The Roles of Age, Attitude, and Use in First Language Development and Attrition of Turkish–English Bilinguals. Language Learning 70, 54–84.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. and Köpke, B.. 2017. The Relevance of First Language Attrition to Theories of Bilingual Development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7(6), 637–667.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. 1992. Testing between UG-Based and Problem-Solving Models of L2A: Developmental Sequence Data. Language Acquisition 2(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z., and Polinsky, M.. 2015. Heritage Language and Linguistic Theory. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1545.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. A. and Sauermann, A.. 2015. Visual Attention and Quantifier-Spreading in Heritage Russian Bilinguals. Second Language Research 31(1), 75–104.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. A. and Trueswell, J. C.. 2011. Processing of Contrastiveness by Heritage Russian Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(3), 280–300.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L. 2013. Cross-Linguistic Influence in Bilingual Development: Determinants and Mechanisms. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. 2015. Tense, Aspect, and Agreement in Heritage Labrador Inuttitut: Do Receptive Bilinguals Understand Functional Morphology? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1), 30–61.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 2014. Bilingual Language Acquisition: Spanish and English in the First Six Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2016. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2004. Native Language Attrition and Developmental Instability at the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Data, Interpretations and Methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2), 143–145.Google Scholar
Suarez, D. 2002. The Paradox of Linguistic Hegemony and the Maintenance of Spanish As a Heritage Language in the United States. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 23(6), 512–530.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. 2007. Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tanner, D. 2019. Robust Neurocognitive Individual Differences in Grammatical Agreement Processing: A Latent Variable Approach. Cortex 111, 210–237.Google Scholar
Traxler, M. J. and Pickering, M. J.. 1996. Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies: An Eye-Tracking Study. Journal of Memory and Language 35(3), 454–475.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. 2013. Assessing the Role of Current and Cumulative Exposure in Simultaneous Bilingual Acquisition: The Case of Dutch Gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(1), 86–110.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. 2005. Bilingualism, Heritage Language Learners, and SLA Research: Opportunities Lost or Seized? The Modern Language Journal 89(3), 410–426.Google Scholar
Van Rijswijk, R. 2016. The Strength of a Weaker First Language: Language Production and Comprehension by Turkish Heritage Speakers in the Netherlands. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Van Rijswijk, R., Muntendam, A., and Dijkstra, T.. 2017. Focus in Dutch Reading: An Eye-Tracking Experiment with Heritage Speakers of Turkish. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32(8), 984–1000.Google Scholar
Villegas, Á. 2014. The Role of L2 English Immersion in the Processing of L1 Spanish Sentence Complement/Relative Clause Ambiguities. Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved from https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/21436.Google Scholar
Villegas, Á. 2018. Bilingual Processing of Comparative Structures in Spanish. Languages 3(3), 35.Google Scholar
White, L. 2003. Fossilization in Steady State L2 Grammars: Persistent Problems with Inflectional Morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6(2), 129–141.Google Scholar
White, L. 2018. Formal Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. In Miller, D., Bayram, F., Rothman, J., and Serratrice, L. (eds.), Bilingual Cognition and Language: The State of the Science across Its Subfields. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 57–78.Google Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska–Macgregor, M., and Leung, Y. K. I.. 2004. Gender and Number Agreement in Non-native Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics 25(1), 105–133.Google Scholar
Winter, B. and Wieling, M.. 2016. How to Analyze Linguistic Change Using Mixed Models, Growth Curve Analysis and Generalized Additive Modeling. Journal of Language Evolution 1(1), 7–18.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, G. 2013. Bilingual Language Development among the First Generation Turkish Immigrants in the Netherlands. Doctoral dissertation, Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×