Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:44:43.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Semantics of Heritage Languages

from Part III - Grammatical Aspects of Heritage Languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2021

By
Tania Ionin
Edited by
Silvina Montrul  and
Maria Polinsky
Silvina Montrul
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Maria Polinsky
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides an overview of the research on semantics and related interface phenomena in heritage language grammars, focusing on three main questions: (i) whether the phenomena under investigation are subject to incomplete acquisition and/or attrition in heritage language grammars; (ii) whether heritage language grammars are subject to cross-linguistic influence from the dominant language; and (iii) whether interface phenomena are particularly vulnerable in incomplete acquisition and/or attrition. These questions are investigated in four linguistic domains that fall at the interface between syntax and semantics where there has been a substantial body of research with heritage speakers: semantics of the verbal domain, such as tense/aspect and unaccusativity; semantics of the nominal domain, such as definiteness and genericity; semantics of subject and object expression, including binding and case-marking; and quantifier semantics.

Keywords

semanticssyntax/semantics interfaceaspectdefinitenessgenericityreferencebindingcasedifferential object markingquantifiers
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics , pp. 668 - 690
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, H. D. 1991. Light Verbs and VP-Movement, Negation and Clausal Architecture in Korean and Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Aissen, J. 2003. Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 435–448.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F. and Miller, R.. 1976. How Children Talk about What Happened. Journal of Child Language 3, 167–189.Google Scholar
Arslan, S., De Kok, D., and Bastiaanse, R.. 2017. Processing Grammatical Evidentiality and Time Reference in Turkish Heritage and Monolingual Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(3), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891500084XGoogle Scholar
Burzio, L. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Chen, C.-Y. 2019. The Acquisition of Mandarin Reflexives by Heritage Speakers and Second Language Learners. In Ionin, T. and Rispoli, M. (eds.), Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 225–251.Google Scholar
Chung, E. S. 2013. Sources of Difficulty in L2 Scope Judgments. Second Language Research 29, 285–310.Google Scholar
Chung, E. S. 2018. Second and Heritage Language Acquisition of Korean Case Drop. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001218Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dellicarpini, M. 2003. Developmental Stages in the Semantic Acquisition of Quantification by Adult L2 Learners of English: A Pilot Study. In Liceras, J., Zobl, H., and Goodluck, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition conference (GASLA 2002): L2 Links. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 55–63.Google Scholar
Enç, M. 1991. The Semantics of Specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1–26.Google Scholar
Fukuda, S. 2017. Floating Numeral Quantifiers as an Unaccusative Diagnostic in Native, Heritage, and L2 Japanese Speakers. Language Acquisition 24(3), 169–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2016.1179742Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. and Liu, C.-S. L.. 2001. Logophoricity, Attitudes, and Ziji at the Interface. In Cole, P., Hermon, G., and Huang, C.-T. J. (eds.), Long-Distance Reflexives. New York: Academic Press, 141–195.Google Scholar
Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J.. 1964. The Early Growth of Logic in the Child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jia, R. and Paradis, J.. 2015. The Use of Referring Expressions in Narratives by Mandarin Heritage Language Children and the Role of Language Environment Factors in Predicting Individual Differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(4), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000728Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2009. Binding Interpretations of Anaphors by Korean Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 16(1), 3–35.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2010. Dominant Language Influence in Acquisition and Attrition of Binding: Interpretation of the Korean Reflexive Caki. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890999037XGoogle Scholar
Kim, K., O’Grady, W., and Schwartz, B. D.. 2018. Case in Heritage Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8(2), 252–282. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16001.kimGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. 2012. Specific and Generic Subjects in the Italian of German-Italian Simultaneous Bilinguals and L2 Learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 736–756.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Belikova, A., Özçelik, Ö., Stangen, I., and White, L.. 2017. Restrictions on Definiteness in the Grammars of German-Turkish Heritage Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.13031.kupGoogle Scholar
Laleko, O. 2011. Restructuring of Verbal Aspect in Heritage Russian: Beyond Lexicalization. International Journal of Language Studies 5(3), 13–26.Google Scholar
Lee, M., Kwak, H.-Y., Lee, S., and O’Grady, W.. 2010. Processing, Pragmatics, and Scope in Korean and English. In Proceedings of 19th Japanese-Korean Linguistic Conference. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lee, T. 2011. Grammatical Knowledge of Korean Heritage Speakers: Early vs. Late Bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(2), 149–174.Google Scholar
Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M.. 1995. Unaccusativity at the Syntax Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R. and Wexler, K.. 1987. Parameters, Binding Theory, and Learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 413–444.Google Scholar
Marsden, H. 2009. Distributive Quantifier Scope in English-Japanese and Korean-Japanese Interlanguage. Language Acquisition 16, 135–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meir, N. and Polinsky, M.. 2021. Restructuring in Heritage Grammars: Adjective-noun and Numeral-noun Expressions in Israeli Russian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 11(2), 222–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, G. 1977. Toward an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–29.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, S. 1989. Syntax and Semantics: Structure and Case Marking in Japanese. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2002. Incomplete Acquisition and Attrition of Spanish Tense/Aspect Distinctions in Adult Bilinguals Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5, 39–68.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2004. Subject and Object Expression in Spanish Heritage Speakers: A Case of Morpho-syntactic Convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7, 1–18.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2005. Second Language Acquisition and First Language Loss in Adult Early Bilinguals: Exploring Some Differences and Similarities. Second Language Research 21(3), 199–249.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2009. Knowledge of Tense-Aspect and Mood in Spanish Heritage Speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 239–369.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Bowles, M.. 2009. Back to Basics: Differential Object Marking under Incomplete Acquisition in Spanish Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(3), 363–383.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Bowles, M.. 2010. Is Grammar Instruction Beneficial for Heritage Language Learners? Dative Case Marking in Spanish. Heritage Language Journal 7(1), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. and Ionin, T.. 2010. Transfer Effects in the Interpretation of Definite Articles by Spanish Heritage Speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13, 449–473.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Ionin, T.. 2012. Dominant Language Transfer in Spanish Heritage Speakers and L2 Learners in the Interpretation of Definite Articles. Modern Language Journal 96, 70–94.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Polinsky, M.. 2011. Why Not Heritage Speakers? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1), 58–62.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Sánchez-Walker, N.. 2013. Differential Object Marking in Child and Adult Spanish Heritage Speakers. Language Acquisition 20(2), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2013.766741Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., and Girju, R.. 2015. Differential Object Marking in Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian as Heritage Languages. Language 91(3), 564–610.Google Scholar
Musolino, J. and Lidz, J.. 2006. Why Children Aren’t Universally Successful with Quantification. Linguistics 44(4), 817–852. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.026Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and Choo, M.. 2001. The Acquisition of Relative Clauses by Heritage and Non-heritage Learners of Korean as a Second Language, a Comparative Study. Journal of Korean Language Education 12, 283–294.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H.-Y., Lee, O.-S., and Lee, M.. 2011. An Emergentist Perspective on Heritage Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000744Google Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D., Lingwall, A., and Rothman, J.. 2012. Applying the Interface Hypothesis to Heritage Speaker Acquisition: Evidence from Spanish Mood. In Biller, A., Chung, E., and Kimball, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 437–448.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley-Linguistic Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society, University of California, 157–189.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2007. Incomplete Acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14, 191–262.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2008a. Heritage Language Narratives. In Brinton, D., Kagan, O., and Bauckus, S. (eds.), Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. New York: Routledge, 149–164.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2008b. Without Aspect. In Greville, G. C. and Michael, N. (eds.), Case and Grammatical Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 263–282.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2011. Reanalysis in Adult Heritage Language: A Case for Attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 305–328.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage Languages and Their Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. 2009. Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 155–163.Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Polinsky, M., Tsai, C.-Y.E., and Mai, K.. 2017. Cross-Linguistic Scope Ambiguity: When Two Systems Meet. Glossa 2(1), 36.1–28.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. and Sauermann, A.. 2015. Visual Attention and Quantifier-Spreading in Heritage Russian Bilinguals. Second Language Research 31(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314537292Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F., and Baldo, M.. 2009. Bilingual Children’s Sensitivity to Specificity and Genericity: Evidence from Metalinguistic Awareness. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 239–257.Google Scholar
Sherkina-Lieber, M. 2015. Tense, Aspect, and Agreement in Heritage Labrador Inuttitut: Do Receptive Bilinguals Understand Functional Morphology? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1), 30–61. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.1.02sheGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. and Andersen, R.. 1996. Primacy of Aspect in First and Second Language Acquisition: The Pidgin/Creole Connection. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 527–570.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. 1994. Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. 2008. Meaning in the Second Language. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Song, M., O’Grady, W., Cho, S., and Lee, M.. 1997. The Learning and Teaching of Korean in Community Schools. In Kim, Y.-H. (ed.), Korean Language in America 2. American Association of Teachers of Korean, 111–127.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2000a. Differential Effects of Attrition in the L1 Syntax of Near-Native L2 Speakers. In Proceedings of the 24th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 719–725.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2000b. Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs. Language 76, 859–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. 2011. Pinning down the Concept of “Interface” in Bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sorGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. and Filiaci, F.. 2006. Anaphora Resolution in Near-Native Speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22, 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr271oaGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. and Serratrice, L.. 2009. Internal and External Interfaces in Bilingual Language Development: Revisiting the Processing vs. Representation Distinction. The International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L., Filiaci, F., and Baldo, M.. 2009. Discourse Conditions on Subject Pronoun Realization: Testing the Linguistic Intuitions of Older Bilingual Children. Lingua 119, 460–477.Google Scholar
Street, J. A. and Dąbrowska, E.. 2010. More Individual Differences in Language Attainment: How Much Do Adult Native Speakers of English Know about Passives and Quantifiers? Lingua 120(8), 2080–2094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.004Google Scholar
Thomas, M. 1995. Acquisition of the Japanese Reflexive Zibun and Movement of Anaphors in Logical Form. Second Language Research 11(3), 206–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839501100302Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality. The Interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, L. 2011. Second Language Acquisition at the Interfaces. Lingua 121, 577–590.Google Scholar
White, L., Belikova, A., Hagstrom, P., Kupisch, T., and Özçelik, Ö.. 2012. Restrictions on Definiteness in Second Language Acquisition: Affirmative and Negative Existentials in the L2 English of Turkish and Russian Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(1), 54–89.Google Scholar
White, L., Hirakawa, M., and Kawasaki, T.. 1996. Effect of Instruction on Second Language Acquisition of the Japanese Long-Distance Reflexive Zibun. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 41, 135–154.Google Scholar
Yager, L., Hellmold, N., Joo, H.-A., Putnam, M. T., Rossi, E., Stafford, C., and Salmons, J.. 2015. New Structural Patterns in Moribund Grammar: Case Marking in Heritage German. Frontiers in Psychology 6(1716). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01716Google Scholar
Yuan, B. 1998. Interpretation of Binding and Orientation of the Chinese Reflexive Ziji by English and Japanese Speakers. Second Language Research 14(4), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898670904111Google Scholar
Zyzik, E. 2014. Causative Verbs in the Grammar of Spanish Heritage Speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×