Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:29:12.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Domain-Specific Feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

Edited by
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich  and
Jeffrey K. Smith
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
Affiliation:
Queens College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York
Jeffrey K. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback , pp. 121 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Andrade, H. (2008). Self-assessment through rubrics. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 60–63.Google Scholar
Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In Andrade, H. L. & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90–105). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. L. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3–13.Google Scholar
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36, 671–687.Google Scholar
Brown, W. (2008). Young children assess their learning: The power of the quick check strategy. Young Children, 63(6), 14–20.Google Scholar
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2016). Feedback as dialogue. In Peters, M. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–6). Singapore: Springer Singapore.Google Scholar
Chappuis, J. (2015). Seven strategies of assessment for learning (2nd edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Cheah, Y. M. (1998). The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12, 192–209.Google Scholar
Crisp, B. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 571–581.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. (2013). The purposeful classroom. Keynote address at the Primary School Education Seminar and Exhibition 2013, Ministry of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar
Fontana, D., & Fernandes, M. (1994). Improvements in mathematics performance as a consequence of self-assessment in Portuguese primary school pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 407–417.Google Scholar
Gopinathan, S. (2001). Globalisation, the state and education policy in Singapore. In Tan, J., Gopinathan, S., & Ho, W. K. (Eds.), Challenges facing the Singapore education system today (pp. 213–251). Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Guskey, T. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2010). Developing standards-based report cards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Heng, M. A. (2001). Rethinking the meaning of school beyond the academic “A.” In Tan, J., Gopinathan, S., & Ho, W. K. (Eds.), Challenges facing the Singapore education system today (pp. 108–118). Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hogan, D., Chan, M., Rahim, R., Kwek, D., Khin, M. A., Loo, S. C., … & Luo, W. S. (2013). Assessment and the logic of instructional practice in Secondary 3 English and mathematics classrooms in Singapore. Review of Education, 1, 57–106.Google Scholar
Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27, 55–67.Google Scholar
Larson, R. W., & Brown, J. R. (2007). Emotional development in adolescence: What can be learned from school theatre program? Child Development, 78, 1083–1099.Google Scholar
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd edn.). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Lim-Ratnam, C. (2013). Tensions in defining quality pre-school education: The Singapore context. Educational Review, 65, 416–431.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87, 40–49.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2009). Report of the primary education review and implementation committee. Retrieved from www.moe.gov.sg/initiatives/peri/files/peri-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (2010). Press release. PERI Holistic Assessment seminar 2010: 16 schools share Holistic Assessment practices and resources. Retrieved from http://archive-sg.com/sg/m/moe.gov.sg/2015–12 25_7252662_131/Ministry_of_Education_Singapore_Press_Releases_PERI_Holistic_Assessment_Seminar_2010_8212_16_Schools_Share_Holistic_Assessment_Practices_and_Resources/.Google Scholar
Munns, G., & Woodward, H. (2006). Student engagement and student self-assessment: The REAL framework. Assessment in Education, 13, 193–213.Google Scholar
Murtagh, L. (2014). The motivational paradox of feedback: Teacher and student perceptions. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 516–541.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2008). Testing the joy out of learning. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 14–18.Google Scholar
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517.Google Scholar
O’Connor, K. (2009). How to grade for learning: Linking grades to standards (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gomez, S., & Crook, A. C. (2013). Moving feedback forward: Theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 240–252.Google Scholar
Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Rahmat, F. A., & Wong, H. M. (2017, June). Analysing the nature of feedback in classrooms in Singapore. Paper presented at the Seventh Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar
Ratnam-Lim, C. T. L., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015) Large-scale implementation of formative assessment practices in an examination-oriented culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 61–78.Google Scholar
Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(10). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v11n10.pdf.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. R. (2010a). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. R. (2010b). Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 727–743.Google Scholar
Safii, L., & Wong, H. M. (2017, June). Seeing self-assessment and teacher feedback through students’ lenses. Paper presented at the Seventh Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
Scoles, J., Huxham, M., & McArthur, J. (2012). No longer exempt from good practice: Using exemplars to close the feedback gap for exams. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 8, 631–645.Google Scholar
Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.Google Scholar
Tan, K. H. K. (2011a). Assessment for learning in Singapore: Unpacking its meanings and identifying some areas for improvement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 10, 91–103.Google Scholar
Tan, K. H. K. (2011b). Assessment reform in Singapore: Enduring, sustainable or threshold? In Berry, R. & Adamson, B. (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 75–88). London: Springer.Google Scholar
Tan, K. H. K. (2013a). A framework for assessment for learning: Implications for feedback practices within and beyond the gap. International Scholarly Research Notices.Google Scholar
Tan, K. H. K. (2013b). Variation in teachers’ conceptions of alternative assessment in Singapore primary schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadsworth, B. J. (2003). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism (5th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In Andrade, H. & Cizek, G. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2012, April). Sustaining formative assessment with teacher learning communities. PERI HA Professional Learning Series Workshop, Ministry of Education, Singapore.Google Scholar
Wong, H. M. (2012a). The perceptions of Singaporean teachers and students toward academic self-assessments. Doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Wong, H. M. (2012b). Students’ interview transcripts. In The perceptions of Singaporean teachers and students toward academic self-assessments. Doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Wong, H. M. (2016). I can assess myself: Singaporean primary students’ and teachers’ perceptions of students’ self-assessment ability. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 44, 442–457.Google Scholar
Wong, H. M. (2017). Implementing self-assessment in Singapore primary schools: Effects on students’ perceptions of self-assessment. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12, 391–409.Google Scholar

References

Abington, A. (1952). Bigger and better boners. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Afflerbach, P. (2005). National Reading Conference policy brief: High stakes testing and reading assessment. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 151–162.Google Scholar
Albertson, B. (2007). Organization and development features of grade 8 and grade 10 writers: A descriptive study of Delaware student testing program (DSTP) essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 41, 435–465.Google Scholar
Andrade, H., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 287–302.Google Scholar
Balzer, W., Doherty, M., & O’Connor, R. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 410–433.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (2016). What do sociocultural studies of writing tell us about learning to write? In MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd edn., pp. 11–23). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Beach, R., & Freidrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. In MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222–233). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Beck, S., & Jeffrey, J. (2007). Genres of high-stakes writing assessments and the construct of writing competence. Assessing Writing, 12, 60–79.Google Scholar
Burdick, H., Swartz, C., Stenner, J., Fitzgerald, J., Burdick, D., & Hanlon, S. (2013). Measuring students’ writing ability on a computer-analytic developmental scale: An exploratory validity study. Literacy Research & Instruction, 52, 255–280.Google Scholar
Callahan, S. (1999). All done with the best of intentions: One Kentucky high school after six years of State Portfolio tests. Assessing Writing, 6, 5–40.Google Scholar
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 73–84.Google Scholar
Coe, M., Hanita, M., Nishioka, V., & Smiley, R. (2011). An investigation of the impact of the 6+1 Trait Writing model on grade 5 student writing achievement (NCEE 2012–4010). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Coffman, W. (1966). On the validity of essay tests of achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 3, 151–156.Google Scholar
Coniam, D. (2009). Experimenting with a computer essay-scoring program based on ESL student writing scripts. European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 259–279.Google Scholar
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality & Individual Differences, 13, 653–655.Google Scholar
Crossley, S., & McNamara, D. (2017). Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Culham, R. (2003). 6+1 traits of writing: The complete guide, grades 3 and up. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.Google Scholar
Dappen, L., Isernhagen, J., & Anderson, S. (2008). A statewide writing assessment model: Student proficiency and future implications. Assessing Writing, 13, 45–60.Google Scholar
De La Paz, S., Swanson, P., & Graham, S. (1998). Contribution of executive control to the revising problems of students with writing and learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 448–460.Google Scholar
Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.Google Scholar
Elliott, S., Kurz, A., & Neergaard, L. (2012). Large-scale assessment for educational accountability. In Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Urdan, T. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Application to learning and teaching (vol. 3, pp. 111–138). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57, 481–506.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In Galbraith, D. & Torrance, M. (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 139–159). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (1997). Executive control in the revising of students with learning and writing difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 223–234.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2014). The use of multiple forms of assessment in the service of writing. Literacy Research & Instruction, 53, 96–100.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2018). A writer(s) within community model of writing. In Bazerman, C., Berninger, V., Brandt, D., Graham, S., Langer, J., Murphy, S., Matsuda, P., Rowe, D., & Schleppegrell, M., (Eds.), The lifespan development of writing (pp. 271–325). Urbana, IL: National Council of English.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (in press). Writers in community model: 15 recommendations for future research in using writing to promote science learning. In Prain, V. & Hand, B. (Eds.), Future research in science education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Bruch, J., Fitzgerald, J., Friedrich, L., Furgeson, J., Greene, K., Kim, J., Lyskawa, J., Olson, C. B., & Smither Wulsin, C. (2016). Teaching secondary students to write effectively (NCEE 2017–4002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Bartlett, B., Popadopoulou, E., & Santoro, J. (2016). Acceptability of adaptations for struggling writers: A national survey with primary grade teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39, 5–16.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Hebert, M. (2011). Informing writing: The benefits of formative assessment. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207–241.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the common core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Elementary School Journal, 115, 498–522.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2011). Throw ’em out or make ’em better? High-stakes writing assessments. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44, 1–12.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 115, 524–547.Google Scholar
Graham, S., Hebert, M., Sandbank, M., & Harris, K. R. (2016). Credibly assessing the writing achievement of young struggling writers: Application of generalizability theory. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., McKeown, D., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 879–896.Google Scholar
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperely, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, R. (1994). The literary life and other curiosities. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity? Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.Google Scholar
Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Horner, R., Carr, E., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–180.Google Scholar
Hosp, J. (2012). Using assessment data to make decisions about teaching and learning. In Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Urdan, T. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Application to learning and teaching (vol. 3, pp. 87– 110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Huang, J. (2008). How accurate are ESL students’ holistic writing scores on large-scale assessments? A generalizability theory approach. Assessing Writing, 13, 201–218.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, J. (2009). Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability. Assessing Writing, 14, 3–24.Google Scholar
Jones, I., (1998). The effect of computer-generated spoken feedback on kindergarten students’ written narratives. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 9, 43–56.Google Scholar
Karask, H., Fer, S., & Orhan, F. (2014). The effect of using cooperative and individual weblog to enhance writing performance. Educational Technology & Society, 17, 229–241.Google Scholar
Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160.Google Scholar
Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar
Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79–97.Google Scholar
Lederer, R. (1993). More anguished English. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Lederer, R. (2000). The bride of anguished English. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Linkletter, A. (1962). Kids sure rite funny. New York: Banard Geis Associates.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A., & Smith, J. (2009a). “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback message. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 21, 347–367.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A., & Smith, J. (2009b). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 319–333.Google Scholar
MacArthur, C. (2016). Instruction in evaluation and revision. In MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd edn., pp. 272–287). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive perspective. In MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 24–40). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
MacArthur, C., Graham, S., Schwartz, S., & Shafer, W. (1995). Evaluation of a writing instruction model that integrated a process approach, strategy instruction, and word processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 278–291.Google Scholar
Matsumura, L., Patthey-Chavez, G., Valdes, R., & Garnier, H. (2002). Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third grade students’ revisions in lower and higher-achieving urban schools. Elementary School Journal, 103, 3–25.Google Scholar
Moore, N., & MacArthur, C. (2016). Student use of automated essay evaluation technology during revision. Journal of Writing Research, 8, 149–175.Google Scholar
Nicolaidou, I. (2013). E-portfolios supporting primary students’ writing performance and peer feedback. Computers & Education, 68, 404–415.Google Scholar
Parke, C., Lane, S., & Stone, C. (2006). Impact of a state performance assessment program in reading and writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 239–269.Google Scholar
Peterson, S. (2003). Peer response and students’ revisions of their narrative writing. LI – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 3, 239–272.Google Scholar
Rijlaarsdam, G., Baarksma, M., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., Tillema, M., Steendam, E., & Raedts, M. (2012). Writing. In Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Urdan, T. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Application to learning and teaching (vol. 3, pp. 189–228). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den bergh, H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Raedts, M., Steendam, E., Rogers, L., & Graham, S. (2008). A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 879–906.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–140.Google Scholar
Salovey, P., & Haar, M. (1990). The efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy and writing process training for alleviating writing anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 515–528.Google Scholar
Sanchez, C., Atkinson, K., Koenka, A., Moshontz, H., & Cooper, H. (in press). Self- and peer-grading of formative and summative assessments in 3rd through 12th grade classrooms: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993a). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337–354.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993b). Writing strategy instruction with gifted students: Effects of goals and feedback on self-efficacy and skills. Roeper Review, 15, 225–230.Google Scholar
Smith, J., & Lipenvich, A. (2009). Formative assessment in higher education: Frequency and consequence. In McInerey, D., Brown, G., & Liem, G. (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessments for learning (pp. 279–296). Charlotte, NC: IAP.Google Scholar
Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 324–328.Google Scholar
Toorenaar, A., & Van den Bergh, H. (2008). Observations of peers learning to write. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 53–83.Google Scholar
Underwood, J., & Tregidgo, A. (2006). Improving student writing through effective feedback: Best practices and recommendations. Journal of Teaching Writing, 22, 73–98.Google Scholar
Welch, N. (1977). Getting restless: Rethinking revision in writing instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook.Google Scholar
Wiliam, D. (2006). Formative assessment: Getting the focus right. Educational Assessment, 11, 283–289.Google Scholar
Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2015). Automated essay evaluation software in English language arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94–109.Google Scholar
Zheng, B., Lawrence, J., Warschauer, M., & Lin, C. (2015). Middle school students’ writing and feedback in a cloud-based classroom environment. Technology, Knowledge, Learning, 20, 201–229.Google Scholar
Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., & Mewborn, C. (2016). Toward a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback: A mixed methods study. Reading & Writing, 29, 349–370.Google Scholar

References

Attali, Y. (2015). Effects of multiple-try feedback and question type during mathematics problem solving on performance in similar problems. Computers & Education, 86, 260–267.Google Scholar
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.Google Scholar
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.Google Scholar
Bee, S. N., & Kaur, B. (2014). Using enhanced feedback to improve the learning of mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 15, 101–110.Google Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. The Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–44.Google Scholar
Bush, W. S. (1989). Mathematical anxiety in upper elementary school teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 89, 499–509.Google Scholar
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 290–298.Google Scholar
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards1.pdf.Google Scholar
Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. Review of Research in Education, 1, 3–55.Google Scholar
Fazio, L., & Siegler, R. (2011). Teaching fractions. Belley, France: Gonnet Imprimeur.Google Scholar
Hadley, K., & Dorward, J. (2011). The relationship among elementary teachers’ mathematics anxiety, mathematics instructional practices, and student mathematics achievement. Journal of Curriculum & Instruction, 5(2), 27–44.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Hodgen, J., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Mathematics inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the mathematics classroom. London: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Karp, K. S. (1991). Elementary school teachers’ attitudes toward mathematics: The impact on students’ autonomous learning skills. School Science and Mathematics, 91, 265–270.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar
Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 21–34.Google Scholar
Meikle, E. M. (2016). Selecting and sequencing students’ solution strategies. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23, 226–234.Google Scholar
Núñez-Peña, M., Bono, R., & Suárez-Pellicioni, M. (2015). Feedback on students’ performance: A possible way of reducing the negative effect of math anxiety in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 80–87.Google Scholar
Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students’ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, 63–73.Google Scholar
Roos, B., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Formative assessment: A cybernetic viewpoint. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 12, 7–20.Google Scholar
Schroth, M. L. (1992). The effects of delay of feedback on a delayed concept formation transfer task. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 78–82.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematical discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
Tchoshanov, M., Cruz, M. D., Huereca, K., Shakirova, K., Shakirova, L., & Ibragimova, E. N. (2017). Examination of lower secondary mathematics teachers’ content knowledge and its connection to students’ performance. International Journal of Science & Math Education, 15, 683–702.Google Scholar
Welder, R. M. (2012). Improving algebra preparation: Implications from research on student misconceptions and difficulties. School, Science and Mathematics, 112, 255–264.Google Scholar

References

Askew, S. (2000). Feedback for learning. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213–238.Google Scholar
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bennett, N., Desforges, C., Cockburn, A., & Wilkinson, B. (1984). The quality of pupil learning experiences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.Google Scholar
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.Google Scholar
Colvin, G. (2008). Talent is overrated: What really separates world-class performers from everybody else. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and science, sports, and games (pp. 14–64). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, E., McCallum, B., & Gipps, C. (2000). Teacher feedback strategies in primary classrooms: New evidence. In Askow, S. (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 34–43). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (1999, August). Influences on student learning. Inaugural lecture, professor of education, University of Auckland. Retrieved from www.arts.auckland.ac.nz/staff/index.cfm?P=5049.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. A. C., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.Google Scholar
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In Lester, J. F. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordance and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 101–116.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar
Kroog, H., King Hess, K., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2016). Implement effective and efficient approaches to formal formative assessment that will save time and boost student learning. Educational Leadership, 73(7), 22–25.Google Scholar
Li, M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Thummaphan, P. (2014, April). Students’ use of written feedback in science notebooks. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Marshall, B., Carmichael, P., & Drummond, M.-J. (2007). Learning how to learn in classrooms. In James, M., McCormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M.-J., Fox, A., MacBeath, J., Marshall, B., Pedder, D., Procter, R., Swaffield, S., Swann, J., & Wiliam, D. (Eds.), Improving learning how to learn: Classrooms, schools, and network (pp. 56–71). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Learning targets: Helping students aim for understanding in today’s lesson. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar
Nebelsick-Gullett, L., Hamen Farrar, C., Huff, K., & Packman, S. (2013). Design of interim assessment for instructional purpose: A case study using evidence centered design in advanced placement. In Lissitz, R. W. (Ed.), Informing the practice of teaching using formative and interim assessments (pp. 21–48). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning process: Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 5(1), 85–102.Google Scholar
Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2010). Developing and Evaluating Measures of Formative Assessment Practice (DEMFAP) theoretical and methodological approach. Manuscript, Laboratory of Educational Assessment, Research, and Innovation (LEARN), University of Colorado Denver.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3–4), 205–235.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E., Ayala, C., Yin, Y., & Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Formative assessment, motivation, and science learning. In Cizek, G. J. & Andrade, H. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 139–158). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Iverson, H., & Sands, D. (2013). Video logging approach. Document for Second Advisory Board Meeting, Laboratory of Educational Assessment, Research, and Innovation, University of Colorado Denver.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2004). On the use of students’ science notebooks as an assessment tool. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 61–85.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2011, April). Looking into the teachers’ feedback practices: How teachers interpret students’ work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013a). Examining formative feedback in the classroom context: New research perspectives. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), Handbook on research on classroom assessment (pp. 215–232). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013b). Analyzing teachers’ feedback practices in response to students’ work in science classrooms. Special Issue on Using Evidence to Take Action: Strategies Teachers Use to Deconstruct Student Work. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 163–175.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Kroog, H. (2016). The impact of observation sampling strategies on the accuracy of inferences about teacher’s formative assessment practices. Paper submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Kroog, H., & Sands, D. (2015, August). Teachers’ judgments on-the-fly: Teachers’ response patterns to students’ responses in the context of informal formative assessment. Paper presented at the Symposium “From Teachers’ Assessment Practices to Shared Professional Judgment Cultures” at the European Association for Research on Instruction and Learning, Limassol, Cyprus.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Sands, D. (2009). Developing and Evaluating Measures of Formative Assessment Practices (DEMFAP). Proposal submitted to the Institute of Education Sciences, Cognition and Student Learning. Award ID: R305A100571.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Sands, D., & Kroog, H. (2016). Developing and Evaluating Measures of Formative Assessment Practices (DEMFAP): Technical report on instrument development and evaluation. Technical report submitted to the Institute of Education Sciences, Washington, DC, IES Grant R305A100571.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Ayala, C. (2008). On the role and impact of formative assessment on science inquiry teaching and learning. In Coffey, J., Douglas, R., & Stearns, C. (Eds.), Assessing science learning: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 21–36). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.Google Scholar
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.Google Scholar
Syed, M. (2010). Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckman, and the science of success. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511.Google Scholar

References

Arnold, J. A. (1995). Effects of competency-based methods of instruction and self-observation on ensemble directors’ use of sequential patterns. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 127–138.Google Scholar
Banton, L. J. (1995). The role of visual and auditory feedback during the sight-reading of music. Psychology of Music, 23, 3–16.Google Scholar
Becker, W. C., & Englemann, S. (1976). Analysis of achievement data on six cohorts of low-income children from 20 school districts in the University of Oregon direct instruction follow through model. College of Education, Oregon University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 145 922.Google Scholar
Bella, S. D. (2015). Defining poor-pitch singing: A problem of measurement and sensitivity. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 272–282.Google Scholar
Benson, W. L. (1989). The effect of models, self-observation, and evaluation on the modification of specified teaching behaviors of an applied music teacher. Update: The Applications of Research in Music Education, 7(2), 28–31.Google Scholar
Bergee, M. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19–27.Google Scholar
Bergee, M. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601–612.Google Scholar
Bergee, M. J., & Cecconi-Roberts, L. (2002). Effects of small-group peer interaction on self-evaluation of music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 256–268.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. (1997). Sequential patterns and the music teaching effectiveness of elementary education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 428–443.Google Scholar
Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51, 5–32.Google Scholar
Burwell, K. (2016). SEMPRE studies in the psychology of music: Studio-based instrumental learning. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byo, J. L. (1994). Tracing the evolution of a research line: The role of sequential patterns in structuring the rehearsal. Journal of the World Association of Symphonic Bands and Ensembles, 1, 67–79.Google Scholar
Byo, J. L., & Schlegel, A. L. (2016). Effects of stimulus octave and timbre on the tuning accuracy of advanced college instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64, 344–359.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. A. (1988). A descriptive analysis of relationships between verbal behaviors of teacher-conductors and ratings of selected junior and senior high school band rehearsals. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 7, 37–40.Google Scholar
Cavitt, M. E. (2003). A descriptive analysis of error correction in instrumental music rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 218–230.Google Scholar
Chaffin, C., & Manfredo, J. (2009). Perceptions of preservice teachers regarding feedback and guided reflection in an instrumental early field experience. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 19(2), 57–72.Google Scholar
Daniel, R. (2001). Self-assessment in performance. British Journal of Music Education, 18, 215–226.Google Scholar
Daniel, R. (2004). Peer assessment in music performance: The development, trial and evaluation of a methodology for the Australian tertiary environment. British Journal of Music Education, 21, 89–110.Google Scholar
Daniel, R. (2006). Exploring music instrument teaching and learning environments: Video analysis as a means of elucidating process and learning outcomes. Music Education Research, 8, 161–215.Google Scholar
Daniel, R. (2007, July). Closing the feedback loop: An investigation and analysis of student evaluations of peer and staff assessments in music performance. Paper presented at the XXIXth meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Music Education, Music Values, Research, and Initiatives, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Droe, K. L. (2012). Effect of verbal praise on achievement goal orientation, motivation, and performance attribution. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 23, 63–78.Google Scholar
Duke, R. A. (1985). Wind instrumentalists’ intonational performance of selected musical intervals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 101–111.Google Scholar
Duke, R. A. (1994). Bringing the art of rehearsing into focus: The rehearsal frame as a model for prescriptive analysis of rehearsing conducting. Journal of Band Research, 30, 78–95.Google Scholar
Duke, R. A. (2005). Intelligent music teaching: Essays on the core principals of effective instruction. Austin, TX: Learning and Behavior Resources.Google Scholar
Duke, R. A., & Blackmail, M. D. (1991). The relationship between observers’ recorded teacher behavior and evaluation of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 290–297.Google Scholar
Duke, R. A., Cash, C. D., & Allen, S. E. (2011). Focus of attention affects performance of motor skills in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 44–55.Google Scholar
Duke, R. A., & Henninger, J. C. (1998). Effects of verbal corrections on student attitude and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 482–495.Google Scholar
Duke, R. A., & Henninger, J. C. (2002). Teachers’ verbal corrections and observers’ perceptions of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 75–87.Google Scholar
Duke, R. A., & Prickett, C. A. (1987). The effect of differentially focused observation on evaluation of instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 27–37.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. E. (1997). Effect of rehearsal hierarchy and reinforcement on attention, achievement, and attitude of selected choirs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 547–567.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. J., & Thayer, J. F. (2010). Music and autonomic nervous system (dys)function. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(4), 317–326.Google Scholar
Finney, S. A. (1997). Auditory feedback and musical keyboard performance. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 153–174.Google Scholar
Goebl, W., & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 427–438.Google Scholar
Goolsby, T. W. (1997). Verbal instruction in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of three career levels and preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 21–40.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. J. (2012). Musical imagination: Perception and production, beauty and creativity. Psychology of Music, 40, 539–557.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. J., MacDonald, R. A. R., & Miell, D. E. (2005). How do people communicate using music? In Miell, D. E., MacDonald, R. A. R., & Hargreaves, D. J. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Havlicek, L. L. (1968). Effect of delayed auditory feedback on musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 16, 308–318.Google Scholar
Ivaldi, A. (2016). Students’ and teachers’ orientation to learning and performing in music conservatoire lesson interactions. Psychology of Music, 44, 202–218.Google Scholar
Kostka, M. J. (1984). An investigation of reinforcements, time use, and student attentiveness in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(2), 113–122.Google Scholar
MacLeod, R. B., & Napoles, J. (2011). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness during teaching episodes with positive and negative feedback. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 22, 91–102.Google Scholar
Maclin, J. P. (1993). The effect of task analysis on sequential patterns of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 48–56.Google Scholar
Madsen, C. H., & Madsen, C. K. (1983). Teaching/discipline: Behavioral principles toward a positive approach. Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing.Google Scholar
Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1985a). Observation of teacher/student interactions in music: Observer perceptions versus actual events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205–214.Google Scholar
Madsen, C. K, & Duke, R. A. (1985b). Perception of approval/disapproval in music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 85, 119–130.Google Scholar
Madsen, C. K., and Yarbrough, C. (1985). Competency-based music education. Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing.Google Scholar
McPhail, G. J. (2010) Crossing boundaries: Sharing concepts of music teaching from classroom to studio. Music Education Research, 12, 33–45.Google Scholar
Montemayor, M., & Moss, E. A. (2009). Effects of recorded models on novice teachers’ rehearsal verbalizations, evaluations, and conducting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 236–251.Google Scholar
Montemayor, M., Silvey, B. A., Adams, A. L., & Witt, K. L. (2015). Effects of internal and external focus of attention during novices’ instructional preparation on subsequent rehearsal behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 455–468.Google Scholar
Moore, R. S. (1976). The effects of videotaped feedback self-evaluation forms on teaching skills, musicianship, and creativity of prospective elementary teachers. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 47, 1–15.Google Scholar
Napoles, J. (2008). Relationships among instructor, peer, and self-evaluations of undergraduate music education majors’ micro-teaching experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 82–91.Google Scholar
NCCAS. (2014). National Music Standards. Retrieved from www.nationalartsstandards.org/.Google Scholar
Palmer, C., Koopmans, E., Loehr, J. D., & Carter, C. (2009). Movement-related feedback and temporal accuracy in clarinet performance. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 439–449.Google Scholar
Parkes, K. A. (2010). The use of criteria specific performance rubrics for student self-assessment: A case study. In Brophy, T. (Ed.), The practice of assessment in music education: Frameworks, models, and designs (pp. 453–458). Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.Google Scholar
Powell, S. R. (2016). The influence of video reflection on preservice music teachers’ concerns in peer- and field-teaching settings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 487–507.Google Scholar
Price, H. E. (1989). An effective way to teach and rehearse: Research supports using sequential patterns. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 8, 42–46.Google Scholar
Price, H. E. (1992). Sequential patterns of instruction and learning to use them. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 14–29.Google Scholar
Price, H. E., & Yarbrough, C. (1991). Validation of sequential patterns of instruction in music. Canadian Music Educator, Research Edition, 33, 165–174.Google Scholar
Price, H. E., & Yarbrough, C. (1993/1994). Effect of scripted sequential patterns of instruction in music rehearsals on teaching evaluations by college non-music students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 119, 170–178.Google Scholar
Priest, T. (2006) Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement. Psychology of Music, 34, 47–61.Google Scholar
Roesler, R. A. (2017) Independence pending: Teacher behaviors preceding learner problem solving. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64, 454–473.Google Scholar
Rostvall, A.-L., & West, T. (2003). Analysis of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching. Music Education Research, 5, 213–226.Google Scholar
Salzberg, R. S., & Salzberg, C. L. (1981). Praise and corrective feedback in the remediation of incorrect left-hand positions of elementary string players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, C. P. (1989). Individual differences in the perception of applied music teaching feedback. Psychology of Music, 17, 110–122.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. P. (1995). Attributions of success, grade level, and gender as factors in choral students’ perceptions of teacher feedback. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 313–329.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. P., & Zdzinski, S. F. (1993). Cited quantitative research articles in music education research journals, 1975–1990: A content analysis of selected studies. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 5–18.Google Scholar
Siebenaler, D. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher–student interactions in the piano lessons of children and adults. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 6–20.Google Scholar
Spahn, C., Walther, J. C., & Nusseck, M. (2015). The effectiveness of a multimodal concept of audition training for music students in coping with music performance anxiety. Psychology of Music, 44, 893–909.Google Scholar
Speer, D. R. (1994). An analysis of sequential patterns of instruction in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 14–26.Google Scholar
Sundberg, J., & Verrillo, R. T. (1992) Editorial. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 277–280.Google Scholar
Svec, C. L. (2017). The effects of instruction on the singing ability of children ages 5 to 11: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Music, advance online publication. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617709920.Google Scholar
Todd, N. P. (1993). Vestibular feedback in musical performance: Response to somatosensory feedback in musical performance. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 379–382.Google Scholar
Welch, G. F. (1985). A schema theory of how children learn to sing in tune. Psychology of Music, 13, 3–18.Google Scholar
Welch, G. F., Howard, D. M., & Rush, C. (1989). Real-time visual feedback in the development of vocal pitch accuracy in singing. Psychology of Music, 17, 146–157.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. A. (2011). High school band students’ and directors’ perceptions of verbal and nonverbal teaching behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 290–309.Google Scholar
Wolfe, D. E., & Jellison, J. A. (1990). Music and elementary education students’ evaluations of music-teaching scripts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 311–321.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, C., & Madsen, K. (1998). The evaluation of teaching in choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 469–481.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. E. (1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness based on rehearsal activity and teacher behavior. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 209–217.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. E. (1989). Sequential patterns of instruction in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 179–187.Google Scholar
Yarbrough, C., Wapnick, J., & Kelley, R. (1979). Effect of videotape feedback techniques on performance, verbalization, and attitude of beginning conductors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 103–112.Google Scholar
Younger, K. G. (1998). An observational analysis of instructional effectiveness in intermediate level band and orchestra rehearsals. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

References

ACT, Inc. (2017). ACT Tessera social and emotional learning assessment: Comprehensive theory of action. Retrieved from: https://pages2.act.org/rs/035-EZR-959/images/Tessera_Theory_of_Action.pdf?aliId=62500134.Google Scholar
Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.Google Scholar
Belfield, C., Bowden, A. B., Klapp, A., Levin, H., Shand, R., & Zander, S. (2015). The economic value of social and emotional learning. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 6, 508–544.Google Scholar
Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health behaviors: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 887–919.Google Scholar
Brackett, M. A., & Rivers, S. E. (2014). Transforming students’ lives with social and emotional learning. In Pekrun, R. & Linnebrink-Gracia, L. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
CASEL. (2015). Effective social and emotional learning programs: Middle and high school edition. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Retrieved from: https://casel.org/middle-and-high-school-edition-casel-guide/.Google Scholar
CASEL. (2017). What is SEL? Retrieved from: https://casel.org/what-is-sel/.Google Scholar
Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers’ perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. New York: Conference Board. Retrieved from www.conference-board.org/pdf_free/BED-06-Workforce.pdf.Google Scholar
Character Lab. (2017). Character Growth Card. Retrieved from https://cdn.characterlab.org/assets/Character-Growth-Card-cad815b0b3ba79c794bcfd3a89e2a8d5ac3057963fff02cee539d8d9af1b9777.pdf.Google Scholar
Conley, D. T., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Creating systems of assessment for deeper learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.Google Scholar
Corcoran, R. P., Cheung, A., Kim, E., & Chen, X. (2017). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I., Su, R., Shanahan, M., Trautwein, U., & Roberts, B. W. (2014). Can personality traits and intelligence compensate for background disadvantage? Predicting status attainment in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 473–489.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Whalley, L. J., & Starr, J. M. (2003). IQ at age 11 and longevity: Results from a follow-up of the Scottish Mental Survey 1932. In Finch, C. E., Robine, J.-M., & Christen, Y. (Eds.), Brain and longevity: Perspectives in longevity (pp. 153–164). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programs. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44, 237–251.Google Scholar
Dunesbury, L., Weissberg, R. P., Goren, P., & Domitrovich, C. (2014). State standards to advance social and emotional learning: Findings from CASEL’s state scan of social and emotional learning standards, preschool through high school, 2014. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Retrieved from www.casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/casel-brief-on-state-standards-january-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal intervention. Child Development, 82, 405–432.Google Scholar
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 294–309.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Retrieved from www.nap.edu/download/10022.Google Scholar
Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2009). Changing the subject: The educational implications of developing emotional wellbeing. Oxford Review of Education, 35, 371–389.Google Scholar
Elias, M. J., Ferrito, J. J., & Moceri, D. C. (2016 ). The other side of the report card: Assessing students’ social, emotional, and character development. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Ge, X., & Conger, R. D. (1999). Adjustment problems and emerging personality characteristics from early to late adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 429–459.Google Scholar
Haller, E. P., Child, D. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of “metacognitive” studies. Educational Researcher, 17, 5–8.Google Scholar
Hart Research Associates. (2010). Raising the bar: Employers’ views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2009_EmployerSurvey.pdf.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 7–77.Google Scholar
Hezlett, S., Kuncel, N., Vey, M., Ahart, A., Ones, D., Campbell, J., & Camara, W. (2001). The effectiveness of the SAT in predicting success early and late in college: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Hooper, A. C., Cullen, M. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Operational threats to the use of situational judgment tests: Faking, coaching, and retesting issues. In Weekley, J. and Ployhart, R. (Eds.), Situational judgment tests (pp. 205–323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1890.)Google Scholar
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Adams, R., Perry, D. G., Workman, K. A., Furdella, J. Q., & Egan, S. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion, and peer relationships in early adolescents: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224–251.Google Scholar
John, O. P., & De Fruyt, F. D. (2015). Framework for the Longitudinal Study of Social and Emotional Skills in Cities. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/CERI/CD(2015)13&docLanguage=En.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. H. (2012). Opening minds. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.Google Scholar
Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Hoglund, W. L. G., & Aber, J. L. (2010). A school-randomized clinical trial of an integrated social-emotional learning and literacy intervention: Impacts after 1 school year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 829–842.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.Google Scholar
Kautz, T., Heckman, J. J., Diris, R., ter Weel, B. T., & Borghans, L. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: Improving noncognitive skills to promote lifetime success. OECD, Educational and Social Progress. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/Fostering-and-Measuring-Skills-Improving-Cognitive-and-Non-Cognitive-Skills-to-Promote-Lifetime-Success.pdf.Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. (1927). The interpretation of educational measurements. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar
Kobrin, J. L., Patterson, B. F., Shaw, E. J., Mattern, K. D., & Barbuti, S. M. (2008). Validity of the SAT® for predicting first-year college grade point average. College Board Research Rep. No. 2008-5. New York: College Board.Google Scholar
Kyllonen, P. C., Lipnevich, A. A., Burrus, J., & Roberts, R. D. (2014). Personality, motivation, and college readiness: A prospectus for assessment and development. ETS Research Report Series, 2014, 1–48.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014). Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment in writing. Instructional Science, 42, 539–559.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., & Roberts, R. D. (2016). Psychosocial constructs: Knowns, unknowns, and future directions. In Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., and Roberts, R. D. (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice. Springer.Google Scholar
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 319–333.Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J. (2010). Final topic assessment rubric. Social and emotional learning standards rubric assessment system and the scales, the handbook, and implementation. Unpublished documents prepared for the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL).Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J. (2015). Using formative assessment with SEL skills. In Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., & Gullotta, T. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 336–347). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Mattern, K. D., & Patterson, B. F. (2011).The validity of the SAT for predicting fourth-year grades: 2006 SAT validity sample. College Board Statistical Report 2011-7. New York: College Board.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Report by the Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., & Pachan, M. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: Findings from three scientific reviews. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Retrieved from www.casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/PDF-4-the-positive-impact-of-social-and-emotional-learning-for-kindergarten-to-eighth-grade-students-executive-summary.pdf.Google Scholar
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.Google Scholar
Primi, R., Santos, D., John, O. P., & De Fruyt, F. (2016). Development of an inventory assessing social and emotional skills in Brazilian youth. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 5–16.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. B., Allen, J., Casillas, A., Peterson, C. H., & Le, H. (2006). Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 598–616.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. B., Oh, I., Lee, H., & Buton, C. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1163–1184.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R, Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. D., Martin, J. E., & Olaru, G. (2015). A Rosetta stone for noncognitive skills: Understanding, assessing, and enhancing noncognitive skills in primary and secondary education. Asia Society and Professional Examination Service. Retrieved from: https://pages2.act.org/rosetta-stone-for-noncognitive-skills.html.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar
Schonfeld, D. J., Adams, R. E., Fredstrom, B. K., Weissberg, R. P., Gilman, R., Voyce, C., Tomlin, R., & Speese-Linehan, D. (2015). Cluster-randomized trial demonstrating impact on academic achievement of elementary social emotional learning. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 406–420.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H. (2008). Cognition and instruction. In Learning theories: An educational perspective (pp. 278–323). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th edn.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.Google Scholar
Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2005). An IRT approach to constructing and scoring pairwise preference items involving stimuli on different dimensions: An application to the problem of faking in personality assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 184–201.Google Scholar
Stemler, S. E. (2012). What should university admissions tests predict? Educational Psychologist, 47, 5–17.Google Scholar
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, R. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88, 1156–1171.Google Scholar
Walton, K. E., & Billera, K. A. (2016). Personality development during the school-aged years: Implications for theory, research, and practice. In Lipnevich, A. A., Preckel, F., & Roberts, R. D. (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ziegler, M., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. D. (Eds.) (2011). New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zins, J., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does research say? New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

References

Adcroft, A. (2011). The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(4), 405–419.Google Scholar
Alexander, F. (2000). The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 411–431.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427–441.Google Scholar
Barrie, S. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241.Google Scholar
Barrie, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 439–458.Google Scholar
Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E. (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 545–556.Google Scholar
Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682.Google Scholar
Berdahl, R. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169–180.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd edn.). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, A. (2017). Understanding first-year students’ transition to university: A pilot study with implications for student engagement, assessment, and feedback. Politics, 37(2), 215–228.Google Scholar
Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as medium for developing students’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 721–733.Google Scholar
Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Boud, D., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Bennett, S., Joughin, G., & Molloy, E. (2016). Reframing assessment research through a practice perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 41(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2013). Sustainable feedback and the development of student self-evaluative capacities. In Merry, S., Price, M., Carless, D., & Taras, M. (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students (pp. 113–122). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2016). Feedback as dialogue. In Peters, M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–6). Singapore: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar
Carless, D., & Chan, K. (2017). Managing dialogic use of exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 930–941.Google Scholar
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407.Google Scholar
Carroll, D. (2014). Graduate course experince 2013: A report on the course experience perceptions of recent graduates. Melbourne: Graduate Careers Australia.Google Scholar
Cartwright, P., Ryan, J., Hacker, P., Powell, E., & Reidy, J. (2000, November). Collaboration and interaction: Modelling explored. Paper presented at the Third National Language and Academic Skills Conference: Sources of Confusion. La Trobe University, Bundoora.Google Scholar
Cassidy, S. (2006). Developing employability skills: Peer assessment in higher education. Education+Training, 48(7), 508–517.Google Scholar
Chanock, K. (2004). Introducing student to the culture of enquiry in an arts degree. Milperra (NSW): HERDSA.Google Scholar
Chanock, K. (2007). What academic language and learning advisers bring to the scholarship of learning and teaching: Problems and possibilities for dialogue with the disciplines. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(3), 269–280.Google Scholar
Clerehan, R., & Walker, I. (2003). Student perceptions of preparedness for first-year university assignment writing: The discipline of marketing. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 2(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
Craigie, D. (1998, July). Hold on now! What are universities about anyway? Paper presented at the Third Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference: Strategies for Success in Transition Years. Auckland Institute of Technology in conjunction with Queensland University of Technology, Auckland.Google Scholar
Dawson, P. (2015). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–14.Google Scholar
Dawson, P., & Henderson, M. (2017). How does technology enable scaling up assessment for learning? In Carless, D., Bridges, S., Chan, C., & Glofcheski, Rick (Eds.), Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (pp. 209–222). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Dawson, P., van der Meer, J., Skalicky, J., & Cowley, K. (2014). On the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A systematic review of supplemental instruction and peer-assisted study sessions literature between 2001 and 2010. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 609–639.Google Scholar
Ecclestone, K. (2001). “I know a 2:1 when I see it”: Understanding criteria for degree classifications in franchised university programmes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), 301–313.Google Scholar
Eley, M. (2006). Teachers’ conceptions of teaching, and the making of specific decisions in planning to teach. Higher Education, 51(2), 191–214.Google Scholar
Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenge of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (3), 243–256.Google Scholar
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.Google Scholar
Francis, G. (2005, April). An approach to report writing in statistics courses. Paper presented at the IASE/ISI Satellite Conference on Statistics Education and Communication of Statistics. University of Technology Sydney.Google Scholar
Gair, M., & Mullins, G. (2001). Hiding in plain sight. In Margolis, E. (Ed.), The hidden curriculum in higher education (pp. 21–41). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2000). The New Literacy Studies: From “socially situated” to the work of the social. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180–196). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graff, G. (2003). Clueless in academe: How schooling obscures the life of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Greatorex, J. (2003). Developing and applying level descriptors. Westminster Studies in Education, 26(2), 125–133.Google Scholar
Harvey, L. (2000). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education & Management, 6(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (2009a). The black box of tertiary assessment: An impending revolution. In Meyer, L. H., Davidson, S., Anderson, H., Fletcher, R., Johnston, P. M., & Rees, M. (Eds.), Tertiary assessment and higher education student outcomes: Policy, practice and research (pp. 259–275). Wellington: Ako Aotearoa.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (2009b). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.Google Scholar
Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 51–66.Google Scholar
Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2014). UK review of the provision of information about higher education: National Student Survey results and trends analysis 2005–2013. HEFCE.Google Scholar
Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
James, B., Skillen, J., Percy, A., Tootell, H., & Irvine, H. (2003, November). From integration to transformation. Paper presented at the Fifth National Language and Academic Skills Conference: Challenges, Initiatives, Evaluations and Consequences. Flinders University, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Krause, K. (2001). The university essay writing experience: A pathway for academic integration during transition. Higher Education Research and Development, 20(1), 147–168.Google Scholar
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, R., Kift, S., Wilson, K., Boud, D., Lee, N., & Deem, R. (2015). Whole of degree curriculum design: Transitioning students in, through and out of higher education. Retrieved from http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/33277/1/whole%20degree.pdf.Google Scholar
Lea, M. (1994). “I thought I could write until I came here”: Student writing in higher education. In Gibb, G. (Ed.), Improving student learning (pp. 216–225). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.Google Scholar
Lea, M. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756.Google Scholar
Lea, M., & Stierer, B. (2000). Introduction. In Lea, M. & Stierer, B. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 1–13). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.Google Scholar
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. In Lea, M. & Stierer, B. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 32–46). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368–377.Google Scholar
Lehtomäki, E., Moate, J., & Posti-Ahokas, H. (2016). Global connectedness in higher education: Student voices on the value of cross-cultural learning dialogue. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 2011–2027.Google Scholar
Levin, E. (2000, November). Making expectations clear. Paper presented at the Third National Language and Academic Skills Conference: Sources of Confusion. La Trobe University, Bundoora.Google Scholar
Li, J., & De Luca, R. (2014). Review of assessment feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 378–393.Google Scholar
Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing and “academic literacies”: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192–207.Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Turner, J. (2001). Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 57–68.Google Scholar
Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Loads, D. (2005). Signposts to success: An academic literacies approach to orientation. Paper presented at the Napier University staff conference: Using the Curriculum to Address the Needs of Individual Students. Napier University.Google Scholar
Macdonald, R., & Joughin, G. (2009). Changing assessment in higher education: A model in support of institution-wide improvement. In Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 193–213). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, B. (2011). The morphing of academic practice: Unbundling and the rise of the para‐academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73.Google Scholar
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Naumann, F., Yang, J., Thai, T., Ford, C., & Polly, P. (2016). Virtual patient consultations and the use of an ePortfolio assessment to support student learning of integrated professional skills. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal, 17(3), 69.Google Scholar
Nicol, D. (2006, December). Increasing success in first year courses: Assessment re-design, self-regulation and learning technologies. Paper presented at ASCILITE, Sydney.Google Scholar
Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517.Google Scholar
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.Google Scholar
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122.Google Scholar
Norton, L. (2004). Using assessment criteria as learning criteria: A case study in psychology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 687–702.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 325–335.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, B., Rust, C., & Price, M. (2016). A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 938–949.Google Scholar
Offerdahl, E., & Tomanek, D. (2011). Changes in instructors’ assessment thinking related to experimentation with new strategies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 781–795.Google Scholar
O’Regan, K. (2000, November). We all know what an article review is … or do we? Paper presented at the Third National Language and Academic Skills Conference: Sources of Confusion. La Trobe University, Bundoora.Google Scholar
O’Regan, K. (2005). Theorising what we do: Defamiliarise the university. Paper presented at the Critiquing and Reflecting LAS 2005 Conference. Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Orrell, J. (2006). Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 441–456.Google Scholar
Pardoe, S. (2000a). A question of attribution: The indeterminacy of learning from experience. In Lea, M. & Stierer, B. (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 125–146). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
Pardoe, S. (2000b). Respect and the pursuit of “symmetry” in researching literacy and student writing. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 149–166). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popham, W. (1997). What’s wrong – and what’s right – with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55, 72–75.Google Scholar
Read, B., Francis, B., & Robson, J. (2001). Playing it safe: Undergraduate essay writing and the presentation of the student “voice.” British Journal of Sociology, 22(3), 387–399.Google Scholar
Roberts, P., Maor, D., & Herrington, J. (2016). ePortfolio-based learning environments: Recommendations for effective scaffolding of reflective thinking in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 19(4), 22–33.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 175–194.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.Google Scholar
Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meaning in the assessment of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 391–402.Google Scholar
Scott, P. (1995). The meanings of mass higher education. Buckingham: SRHE.Google Scholar
Skillen, J., Merten, M., Trivett, N., & Percy, A. (1998, July). The IDEALL approach to learning development: A model for fostering improved literacy and learning outcomes for students. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Tai, J., Canny, B., Haines, T., & Molloy, E. (2016). The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: Opportunities in clinical medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(3), 659–676.Google Scholar
Tomas, C., Borg, M., & McNeil, J. (2015). E‐assessment: Institutional development strategies and the assessment life cycle. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 588–596.Google Scholar
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276.Google Scholar
Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. 1. Assessment in Education, 14(3), 281–294.Google Scholar
van der Meer, J. (2006). Spoon-feeding or mind-reading? First year students’ need for explicit communication of expectations. In Proceedings of the 2005 Annual International Conference of the Association of Tertiary Learning Advisors, Aotearoa/New Zealand (ATLAANZ), Dunedin.Google Scholar
van der Meer, J. (2012). “I don’t really see where they’re going with it”: Communicating purpose and rationale to first-year students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(1), 81–94.Google Scholar
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297.Google Scholar

References

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (2016). Common Program Requirements. Retrieved from www.acgme.org.Google Scholar
Archer, J. C. (2010). State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Medical Education, 44, 101–108.Google Scholar
Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. (2015). Graduation Questionnaire National Report. Retrieved from www.afmc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/en/Publications/AFMC%20Graduation%20Questionnaire%20National%20Report%202015.pdf.Google Scholar
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.Google Scholar
Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & Pugh, S. D. (2005). Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 629–643.Google Scholar
Bates, J., Konkin, J., Suddards, C., Dobson, S., & Pratt, D. (2013). Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Medical Education, 47, 362–374.Google Scholar
Bing-You, R. G., & Paterson, J. (1997). Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents’ receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Medical Teacher, 19, 40–44.Google Scholar
Boud, D., Keough, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E. (2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930–942.Google Scholar
Cantillon, P., & Sargeant, J. (2008). Giving feedback in clinical settings. British Medical Journal, 337, a1961.Google Scholar
Carraccio, C., Englander, R., Gilhooly, J., Mink, R., Hofkosh, D., Barone, M. A., & Holmboe, E. S. (2016). Building a framework of entrustable professional activities, supported by competencies and milestones, to bridge the educational continuum. Academic Medicine, 92. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, R. B., & Detsky, A. S. (2011). The education and training of future physicians: Why coaches can’t be judges. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 993–994.Google Scholar
Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., Van Harrison, R., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1094–1102.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A., & Kluger, A. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management, 14, 129–139.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skills acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 24, 177–181.Google Scholar
Dudek, N., Marks, M., & Regher, G. (2005). Failure to fail: The perspectives of clinical supervisors. Academic Medicine, 80(Suppl. 10), S84–S87.Google Scholar
Duffield, K. E., & Spencer, J. A. (2002). A survey of medical students’ views about the purposes and fairness of assessment. Medical Education, 36, 879–886.Google Scholar
Ende, J. (1983). Feedback in clinical medical education. Journal of the American Medical Association, 250, 777–781.Google Scholar
Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 403–422.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79(Suppl. 10), S70–S81.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15, 988–999.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2015). Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: A perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Academic Medicine, 90, 1471–1486.Google Scholar
Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., & Sargeant, J. (2012). Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17, 15–26.Google Scholar
Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(Suppl. 10), S46–54.Google Scholar
Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2008). “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self assessment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 14–19.Google Scholar
Frank, J. R., Snell, L. S., Cate, O. T., Holmboe, E. S., Carraccio, C., Swing, S. R., … & Harris, K. A. (2010). Competency-based medical education: Theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 32, 638–645.Google Scholar
Gabbard, G. O., & Westen, D. (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84(Part 4), 823–841.Google Scholar
Gawande, A. (2011, October 3). Personal best: Top athletes and singers have coaches. Should you? The New Yorker.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. (2009). The Educational Kanban: Promoting effective self-directed adult learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 84, 927–934.Google Scholar
Goodstone, M., & Diamante, T. (1998). Organizational use of therapeutic change: Strengthening multisource feedback systems through interdisciplinary coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 50, 152–163.Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.Google Scholar
Heen, S., & Stone, D. (2014). Managing yourself – finding the coaching in criticism: The right way to receive feedback. Harvard Business Review, 92(1–2), 108–111.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2001). Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 269–274.Google Scholar
Hirsh, D., Walters, L., & Poncelet, A. N. (2012). Better learning, better doctors, better delivery system: Possibilities from a case study of longitudinal integrated clerkships. Medical Teacher, 34, 548–554.Google Scholar
Hodges, B. D. (2010). A tea-steeping or i-Doc model of medical education? Academic Medicine, 85(Suppl. 9), S34–S44.Google Scholar
Holmboe, E. S. (2004). Faculty and the observation of trainees’ clinical skills: Problems and opportunities. Academic Medicine, 79, 16–22.Google Scholar
Holmboe, E. S. (2015). Realizing the promise of competency-based medical education. Academic Medicine, 90, 411–413.Google Scholar
Iobst, W. F., Sherbino, J., Cate, O. T., Richardson, D. L., Dath, D., Swing, S. R., … & Frank, J. R. (2010). Competency-based medical education in postgraduate medical education. Medical Teacher, 32, 651–656.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions towards an understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 7(3), 67–72.Google Scholar
Kluger, A. N., & Van Dijk, D. (2010). Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Medical Education, 44, 1166–1174.Google Scholar
Kogan, J. R., Holmboe, E. S., & Hauer, K. E. (2009). Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302, 1316–1326.Google Scholar
LaDonna, K., Hatala, R., Lingard, L., Voyer, S., & Watling, C. (2017). Staging a performance: Learners’ perceptions about direct observation during residency. Medical Education (in press).Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lefroy, J., Watling, C., Teunissen, P. W., & Brand, P. (2015). Guidelines on feedback for clinical education: The dos, don’ts, and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. Perspectives in Medical Education, 4, 284–299.Google Scholar
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. (2016). Functions and structure of a medical school: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Retrieved from www.lcme.org.Google Scholar
Lockyer, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Holmboe, E., Loney, E., … & Sargeant, J. (2011). Feedback data sources that inform physician self assessment. Medical Teacher, 33(2), e113–e120.Google Scholar
Lye, P. S., Biernat, K. A., Bragg, D. S., & Simpson, D. (2001). A pleasure to work with: An analysis of written comments on student evaluations. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1, 128–131.Google Scholar
Madan, R., Conn, D., Dubo, E., Voore, P., & Wiesenfeld, L. (2012). The enablers and barriers to the use of direct observation of trainee clinical skills by supervising faculty in a psychiatry residency program. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57, 269–272.Google Scholar
Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Science Education, 14, 595–621.Google Scholar
Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C., Eva, K., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., … & Sargeant, J. (2011). Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect/use it create conflict. Academic Medicine, 86, 1120–1127.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mattar, S. G., Alseidi, A. A., Jones, D. B., Jeyarajah, D. R., Swanstrom, L. L., Aye, R. W., … & Minter, R. M. (2013). General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: Results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Annals of Surgery, 258, 440–449.Google Scholar
Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. In Boud, D. & Molloy, E. (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well (pp. 11–33). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn (studies of the person). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Ross, V., Mauksch, L., Huntington, J., & Beard, J. M. (2012). Interdisciplinary direct observation: Impact on precepting, residents, and faculty. Family Medicine, 44, 318–324.Google Scholar
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. (2011). General standards of accreditation applicable to all residency programs. Retrieved from www.royalcollege.ca.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Holmboe, E., Eva, K., … & Loney, E. (2010). Processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model. Academic Medicine, 85, 1212–1220.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Mann, K., Silver, I., … & Boudreau, M. (2016). Evidence-informed facilitated feedback: The R2C2 feedback model. MedEdPORTAL Publications, 12, 10387. Retrieved from www.mededportal.org/publication/10387/.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Eva, K. W., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Holmboe, E., … & van der Vleuten, C. (2011). Features of assessment learners use for informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Medical Education, 45, 636–647.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Lockyer, J., Mann, K., Holmboe, E., Silver, I., Armson, H., … & Power, M. (2015). Facilitated reflective performance feedback: Developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Academic Medicine, 90, 1698–1706.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., & Ferrier, S. (2005). Exploring family physicians’ reactions to multisource feedback: Perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Medical Education, 39, 497–504.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Science Education, 13, 275–288.Google Scholar
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2009). Reflection: A link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Advances in Health Science Education Theory Practice, 3, 399–410.Google Scholar
Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015). The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Academic Medicine, 90(5), 609–614.Google Scholar
Telio, S., Regehr, G., & Ajjawi, R. (2016). Feedback and the educational alliance: Examining credibility judgments and their consequences. Medical Education, 509, 933–942.Google Scholar
ten Cate, O., & Scheele, F. (2007). Competency-based postgraduate training: Can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Academic Medicine, 82, 542–547.Google Scholar
Teunissen, P., Stapel, D., van der Vleuten, C., Scherpbier, A., Boor, K., & Scheele, F. (2009). Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Academic Medicine, 84, 910–917.Google Scholar
Van Niewerburgh, C. (2012). Coaching in education: Getting better results for students, educators and parents. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Voyer, S., Cuncic, C., Butler, D. L., MacNeil, K., Watling, C., & Hatala, R. (2016). Investigating conditions for meaningful feedback in the context of an evidence-based feedback program. Medical Education, 50, 943–954.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watling, C. (2016). The uneasy alliance of assessment and feedback. Perspectives in Medical Education, 5, 262–264.Google Scholar
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., & Lingard, L. (2014). Learning culture and feedback: An international study of medical athletes and musicians. Medical Education, 48, 713–723.Google Scholar
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L. (2012a). Understanding feedback responses: The potential and limitations of regulatory focus theory. Medical Education, 46, 593–602.Google Scholar
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L. (2013). Music lessons: Revealing medicine’s learning culture through comparison with that of music. Medical Education, 47, 842–850.Google Scholar
Watling, C., LaDonna, K., Lingard, L., Voyer, S., & Hatala, R. (2016b). “Sometimes the work just needs to be done”: Sociocultural influences on direct observation in medical training. Medical Education, 50, 1054–1064.Google Scholar
Watling, C. J., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C., & Lingard, L. (2012b). Learning from clinical work: The roles of learning cues and credibility judgments. Medical Education, 46, 192–200.Google Scholar
Watling, C. J., Kenyon, C. F., Schulz, V., Goldszmidt, M. A., Zibrowski, E., & Lingard, L. (2010). An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents. Academic Medicine, 85, 1157–1162.Google Scholar
Watling, C. J., Kenyon, C., Zibrowski, E., Schulz, V., Singh, I, Goldszmidt, M., … & Lingard, L. (2008). Rules of engagement: Residents’ perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Academic Medicine, 83(Suppl. 10), S97–S100.Google Scholar

References

Al Ansari, A., Donnon, T., Al Khalifa, K., Darwish, A., & Violato, C. (2014). The construct and criterion validity of the multi-source feedback process to assess physician performance: A meta-analysis. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 5, 39.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., & Berg, P. Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. New York: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Athota, V. S. (2016). Foundations and future of well-being: How personality influences happiness and well-being. In Impact of organizational trauma on workplace behavior and performance (pp. 279–293). Business Science Reference Press.Google Scholar
Athota, V. S., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). How extraversion + leads to problem-solving ability. Psychological Studies, 60, 332–338.Google Scholar
Atwater, L. E., & Brett, J. F. (2006). 360-degree feedback to leaders: Does it relate to changes in employee attitudes? Group & Organization Management, 31(5), 578–600.Google Scholar
Atwater, L., Waldman, D., Ostroff, C., Robie, C., & Johnson, K. M. (2005). Self–other agreement: Comparing its relationship with performance in the U.S. and Europe. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 25–40.Google Scholar
Baker, N. (2010). Employee feedback technologies in the human performance system. Human Resource Development International, 13(4), 477–485.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
Bell, S. T., & Arthur, W. A. (2008). Feedback acceptance in developmental assessment canters: The role of feedback message, participant personality, and affective response to the feedback session. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 681–703.Google Scholar
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(4), 560–569.Google Scholar
Bommer, W. H., Rubin, R. S., & Bartels, L. K. (2005). Assessing the “unassessable”: Interpersonal and managerial skills. In Martell, K. & Calderon, T. (Eds.), Assessment of student learning in business schools: Best practices each step of the way (pp. 103–130). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research and AACSB International.Google Scholar
Bono, J., & Colbert, A. (2005). Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core self-evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 171–203.Google Scholar
Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management (4th edn.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bracken, D. W., & Rose, D. S. (2011). When does 360-degree feedback create behaviour change? And how would we know it when it does? Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 183–192.Google Scholar
Bracken, D. W., Rose, D. S., & Church, A. H. (2016). The evolution and devolution of 360 degree feedback. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(4), 761–794.Google Scholar
Brett, J., & Atwater, L. (2001). 360-degree feedback: Accuracy, reactions and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 930–942.Google Scholar
Brown, A., Inceoglu, I., & Lin, Y. (2017). Preventing rater biases in 360-degree feedback by forcing choice. Organizational Research Methods, 20(1), 121–148.Google Scholar
Bunker, K. A., Kram, K. E., & Ting, S. (2002). The young and the clueless. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 80–87.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. J., & Lee, C. (1988). Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 302–314.Google Scholar
Campion, M. C., Campion, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (2015). Improvements in performance management through the use of 360 feedack. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(1), 85–93.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135.Google Scholar
Church, A. H. (2016). Is engagement overrated? Five questions to consider before doing your next engagement survey. Talent Quarterly, 9, 1–7.Google Scholar
Conger, J.A. (2002, November 29). The danger of delusion. Financial Times, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Dalton, M. A. (1998). Best practices: Five rationales for using 360-degree feedback in organizations. In Tornow, W. W. & London, M. (Eds.), Maximizing the value of 360-degree feedback: A process for successful individual and organizational development (pp. 59–77). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Decotiis, T., & Petit, A. (1978). The performance appraisal process: A model and some testable propositions. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 635.Google Scholar
Delahaye, B. L. (2004). Human resource development: Adult learning and knowledge management. Milton, Australia: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Delahaye, B. L., Limerick, D. C., & Hearn, G. (1994). The relationship between andragogical and pedagogical orientations and the implications for adult learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 187–200.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? The Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 129–139.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A., & Pritchard, R. (2006). Performance appraisal, performance management and improving individual performance: A motivational framework. Management and Organization Review, 2(2), 253–277.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433.Google Scholar
de Silva, P. (2014). Tackling psychopathy: A necessary competency in leadership development? Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry, 5, 4–6.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Werbel, J. D., & Bedeian, A. G. (1988). An empirical assessment of self-appraisal based performance evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 41, 141–156.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Fleenor, J., Taylor, S., & Chappelow, C. (2008). Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 473–487.Google Scholar
Franceschini, F., & Turina, E. (2013). Quality improvement and redesign of performance measurement systems an application to the academic field. Quality and Quantity, 47, 465–483.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60, 678–686.Google Scholar
Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Roch, S. G., Ray, J. L., & Gamble, J. S. (2017). An exploratory study of current performance management practices: Human resource executives’ perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 193–202.Google Scholar
Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123–136.Google Scholar
Hageman, M. G. J. S., Ring, D. C., Gregory, P. J., Rubash, H. E., & Harmon, L. (2015). Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473(5), 1590–1597.Google Scholar
Hazucha, J. F., Hezlett, S. A., & Schneider, R. J. (1993). The impact of 360‐degree feedback on management skills development. Human Resource Management, 32(2–3), 325–351.Google Scholar
Hermel-Stanescu, M. (2015). The role of performance appraisal in the context of performance management systems. SEA-Practical Application of Science, 3(1), 275–278.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G., & McRae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 52–88.Google Scholar
Hogan, J., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2011). Management derailment: Personality assessment and mitigation. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), American Psychological Association handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 555–575). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Huang, J. L., Piszczek, M. M., Fleenor, J. W., & Ruderman, M. (2017). Rating expatriate leader effectiveness in multisource feedback systems: Cultural distance and hierarchical effects. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 151–172.Google Scholar
Laleman, F., Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015). Understanding cultural singularities of “Indianness” in an intercultural business setting. Culture and Organization, 21(5), 427–447.Google Scholar
Lehman, B. J., & Conley, K. M. (2010). Momentary reports of social-evaluative threat predict ambulatory blood pressure. Psychological Science and Personality Science, 1, 51–56.Google Scholar
Losada, M., & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams: A nonlinear dynamics model. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 740–765.Google Scholar
Luffarelli, J., Goncalves, D., & Stanatoginannakis, A. (2016). When feedback interventions backfire: Why higher performance feedback may result in lower self-percieved competence and satisfaction with performance. Human Resource Management, 55, 591–614.Google Scholar
Malik, A. (2013). Post-GFC people management challenges: A study of India’s information technology sector. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(2), 230–246.Google Scholar
Malik, A., & Pereira, V. (2015). Culture research in India: Critical issues and future research opportunities. In Pereira, Vijay and Malik, Ashish (Eds.), Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations (pp. 185–197). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Malik, A., & Pereira, V. (2016a). Indian culture and work organisations in transition. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malik, A., & Pereira, V. (2016b). India: A culture in transition. In Malik, A. & Pereira, V. (Eds), Indian culture and work organisations in transition (pp. 1–13). New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., and Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for mnagement: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123–136.Google Scholar
McKenna, S., Richardson, J., & Manroop, L. (2011). Alternative paradigms and the study and practice of performance management and evaluation. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 148–157.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly, 32(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1992). Transformation theory: Critique and confusion. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 250–252.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1994a). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 222–232.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1994b). Response to Mark Tennant and Michael Newman. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 243–244.Google Scholar
Mohapatra, M. (2015). 360 degree feedback: A review of literature. Research Scholar of Management KIIT University Bhubaneswar Orissa, 2(1), 112–116.Google Scholar
Moscoso, S., & Salgado, J. (2004). “Dark side” personality styles as predictors of task, contextual, and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 356–362.Google Scholar
Newman, M. (1994). Response to understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 236–242.Google Scholar
Nowack, K. (1999). 360 degree feedback. In Langdon, D. G., Whiteside, K. S., & McKenna, M. M. (Eds.), Intervention: 50 performance technology tools(pp. 34–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Nowack, K., Hartley, J., & Bradley, W. (1999). Evaluating results of your 360-degree feedback intervention. Training and Development, 53, 48–53.Google Scholar
Nowack, M. K., & Mashihi, S. (2012). Evidence-based answers to 15 questions about leveraging 360-degree feedback. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 64(3), 157–182.Google Scholar
Obisi, C. (2011, December). Employee performance appraisal and its implication for individual and organizational growth. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9), 92–97.Google Scholar
O’Connor, P. J., & Athota, V. S. (2013). The intervening role of agreeableness in the relationship between trait emotional intelligence and Machiavellianism: Reassessing the potential dark side of EI. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 750–754.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–568.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2013). East is East? Understanding aspects of Indian culture(s) within organisations. Culture and Organization, 19(5), 453–456.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015a). Human capital in the Indian IT/BPO industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015b). Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations: Empirical evidence. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015c). Culture in Indian organisations: Evidence-based research and practice. In Pereira, V. & Malik, A. (Eds.), Investigating cultural aspects in Indian organizations: Empirical evidence (pp. 1–10). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2015d). Making sense and identifying aspects of Indian culture(s) in organisations: Demystifying through empirical evidence. Culture and Organization, 21(5), 355–365.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., & Malik, A. (2016a). Conclusion and future research directions. In Indian culture and work organisations in transition (pp. 220–232). Abingdon, UK: Routledge and Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Pereira, V., Malik, A., & Froese, F. (2017). Mapping the impact of Asian business systems on HRM and organisational behaviour: Multi-level comparative perspectives. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 11(3), 253–261.Google Scholar
Pichler, S. (2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta‐analysis. Human Resource Management, 51(5), 709–732.Google Scholar
Rai, H., & Singh, M. (2013). A study of mediating variables of the relationship between 360 feedback and employee performance. Human Resource Development International, 66(1), 56–73.Google Scholar
Rusu, G., Avasilcai, S., & Hutu, C.-A. (2016). Employee performance appraisal: A conceptual framework. Annals of the University of Oradea, 53–58.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Oczkowski, E., & Sellby-Smith, C. (2011). To have and to hold: Modelling the drivers of employee turnover and skill retention in Australian organisations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 395–416.Google Scholar
Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta‐analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 33–66.Google Scholar
Swing, S. R. (2007). The ACGME outcome project: Retrospective and prospective. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 648–654.Google Scholar
Tennant, M. (1994). Response to understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 233–235.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (2016). Comparing rater groups: How to disentangle rating reliability from construct-level disagreements. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 800–806.Google Scholar
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Antonioni, D. (1998). Has 360 degree feedback gone amok? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 86–94.Google Scholar
Ward, P. (1997). 360 Feedback. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.Google Scholar
Wright, P., Dunford, B., & Snell, S. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 6, 701–721.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Chang, Q., & Sun, B. (2013). Psychometric characteristics of the 360 feedback scales in professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills assessment of surgery residents in China. Journal of Surgical Education, 70, 628–635.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×