Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:33:30.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Description and Measurement: How Personality Is Studied

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

Edited by
Philip J. Corr  and
Gerald Matthews
Philip J. Corr
Affiliation:
City, University London
Gerald Matthews
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , pp. 101 - 152
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Achenbach, T. M., & McConaughy, S. H. (2003). The Achenbach system of empirically based assessment. In Reynolds, C. R. & Kamphaus, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Personality, behavior, and context (pp. 406–430). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47 (211).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angleitner, A., John, O. P., & Lohr, F.-J. (1986). It’s what you ask and how you ask it: An item metric analysis of personality questionnaires. In Angleitner, A. & Wiggins, J. S. (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement (pp. 61–108). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, E. J., Boyle, G. J., Groth-Marnat, G., Matthews, G., Saklofske, D. H., Schwean, V. L., & Zeidner, M. (2011). Integrating intelligence and personality. In Groth-Marnat, G., Beutler, L. & Harwood, M. (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (3rd ed.) (pp. 119–151). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bagby, R. M., Marshall, M. B., Bury, A. S., Bacchiochi, J. R., & Miller, L. S. (2006). Assessing underreporting and overreporting response styles on the MMPI-2. In Butcher, J. N. (Ed.), MMPI-2: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 39–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Barrett, P. T., Petrides, K. V., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 805–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392–425.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1988). Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In Nesselroade, J. R. & Cattell, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 317–335). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (2007). Can scientifically useful hypotheses be tested with correlations? American Psychologist, 62, 772–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentler, P. M. (2015). EQS structural equations program. Temple City, CA: Multivariate Software, www.mvsoft.comGoogle Scholar
Block, J. (1965). The challenge of response sets: Unconfounding meaning, acquiescence, and social desirability in the MMPI. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, G. J. (1979). Delimitation of state‑trait curiosity in relation to state anxiety and learning task performance. Australian Journal of Education, 23, 70–82.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (1983). Higher‑order factor structure of Cattell’s MAT and 8SQ. Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 6, 119–127.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (1984). Effects of viewing a road trauma film on emotional and motivational factors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 16, 383–386.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (1985). Self‑report measures of depression: Some psychometric considerations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 45–59.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (1989). Sex differences in reported mood states. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1179–1183.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (1990). A review of the factor structure of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire and the Clinical Analysis Questionnaire. Psychological Test Bulletin, 3, 40–45.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (2006). Scientific analysis of personality and individual differences. Unpublished Doctor of Science Thesis, St. Lucia, Queensland: University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (2007). An overview of contemporary personality assessment. Paper presented at the International Military Testing Association Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, 8–12 October.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (2008a). Critique of the five-factor model of personality. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol.1, pp. 295–312). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (2008b). Simplifying the Cattellian psychometric model. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 257–272). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (2009). Personality questionnaires and rating Scales: A flawed methodology? In Westen, D., Burton, L. & Kowalski, R. (Eds.), Psychology: Australian and New Zealand (2nd ed., pp. 436–437). Milton, QLD, Australia: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (2019 ). Overarching personality paradigm: A neo-Cattellian psychometric model. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 317–325.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. (2020). Biography – Raymond B. Cattell (1905–1998). In Carducci, R. et al. (Eds.), The Wiley encyclopedia of personality and individual differences: Personality processes and individual differences (Vol. 3). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., Helmes, E., Matthews, G., & Izard, C. E. (2015). Measures of affect dimensions. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological construct (pp. 190–224). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., & Barton, K. (2008). Contribution of Cattellian personality instruments. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality measurement and testing (Vol. 2, pp. 160–178). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, G. J., & Cattell, R. B. (1984). Proof of situational sensitivity of mood states and dynamic traits––ergs and sentiments––to disturbing stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 541–548.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., & Comer, P. G. (1990). Personality characteristics of direct-service personnel in community residential units. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 16, 125–131.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., Helmes, E., Matthews, G., & Izard, C. E. (2015). Measures of affect dimensions. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 190–224). San Diego, CA: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, G. J., Neumann, D. L., Furedy, J. J., & Westbury, H. R. (2010). Sex differences in verbal and visual-spatial tasks under different hemispheric visual-field presentation conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 396–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, G. J., & Saklofske, D. H. (2004) (Eds.) Sage benchmarks in psychology: The psychology of individual differences (Vols. 1–4). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Matthews, G. (2015). Criteria for selection and evaluation of scales and measures. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 3–15). Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., Stankov, L., & Cattell, R. B. (1995). Measurement and statistical models in the study of personality and intelligence. In Saklofske, D. H. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 417–446). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., Stankov, L., Martin, N. G., Petrides, K. P., Eysenck, M. W., & Ortet, G. (2016). Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 40–47.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., Stanley, G. V., & Start, K. B. (1985). Canonical/redundancy analyses of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, the Motivation Analysis Test, and the Eight State Questionnaire. Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 7, 113–122.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., & Start, K. B. (1989). Sex differences in the prediction of academic achievement using the Children’s Motivation Analysis Test. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 245–252.Google Scholar
Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106–148.Google Scholar
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Burdsal, C. A., & Vaughn, D. S. (1974). A contrast of the personality structure of college students found in the questionnaire medium by items as compared to parcels. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 135, 219–224.Google Scholar
Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. American Psychologist, 39, 214–227.Google Scholar
Burisch, M. (1986). Methods of personality inventory development: A comparative analysis. In Angleitner, A. & Wiggins, J. S. (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement (pp. 109–120). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1946). The description and measurement of personality. New York: World Book.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1973). Personality and mood by questionnaire. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1983). Structured personality-learning theory: A wholistic multivariate approach. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1986a). General principles across the media of assessment. In Cattell, R. B. & Johnson, R. C. (Eds.), Functional psychological testing: Principles and instruments (pp. 15–32). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1986b). Selecting, administering, scoring, recording, and using tests in assessment. In Cattell, R. B. & Johnson, R. C. (Eds.) (1986). Functional psychological testing: Principles and instruments (pp. 105–126). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1986c). Structured tests and functional diagnoses. In Cattell, R. B. & Johnson, R. C. (Eds.), Functional psychological testing: Principles and instruments (pp. 3–14). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1986d). The psychometric properties of tests: Consistency, validity, and efficiency. In Cattell, R. B. & Johnson, R. C. (Eds.), Functional psychological testing: Principles and instruments (pp. 54–78). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1988). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In Nesselroade, J. R. & Cattell, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1994). A cross-validation of primary personality structure in the 16 PF by two parcelled factor analyses. Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 10, 181–190.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1995, May). The fallacy of five factors in the personality sphere. The Psychologist, 207–208.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Boyle, G. J., & Chant, D. (2002). The enriched behavioral prediction equation and its impact on structured learning and the dynamic calculus. Psychological Review, 109, 202–205.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1994). The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Child, D. (1975). Motivation and dynamic structure. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Kline, P. (1977). The scientific analysis of personality and motivation. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Krug, S. E. (1971). A test of the trait-view theory of distortion in measurement of personality questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 721–734.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Krug, S. E. (1986). The number of factors in the 16PF: A review of the evidence with special emphasis on methodological problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 509–522.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Schuerger, J. M. (1978). Personality theory in action: Handbook for the Objective-Analytic (O-A) Test Kit. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Child, D. (1990). The essentials of factor analysis (2nd ed.). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Comrey, A. L. (1984). Comparison of two methods to identify major personality factors. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 397–408.Google Scholar
Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754–761.Google Scholar
Comrey, A. L. (2008). The Comrey Personality Scales. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality measurement and testing (Vol. 2, pp. 113–134). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (1994). Technical manual for the 16 PF (5th ed.). Champaign, IL, Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Conners, C. K. (1997). Conners Rating Scales – Revised technical manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems Inc.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–303.Google Scholar
Cuttance, P. (1987). Issues and problems in the application of structural equation models. In Cuttance, P. & Ecob, R. (Eds.), Structural modeling by example: Applications in educational, sociological, and behavioral research (pp. 241–279). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cuttance, P., & Ecob, R. (1987) (Eds.) Structural modeling by example: Applications in educational, sociological, and behavioral research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drasgow, F., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (1999) (Eds.) Innovations in computerized assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
Exner, J. (2005). A Rorschach workbook for the comprehensive system (5th ed.). Asheville, NC: Rorschach Workshops.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667–673.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (junior and adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. T. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. (PDF). Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21–29.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. A. (1981). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (5th ed.). Auckland, New Zealand: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–344.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & North, M. S. (2015). Measures of stereotyping and prejudice: Barometers of bias. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (2015) (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 684–718). Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar
Gillis, J. S., & Boyle, G. J. (2019). Factor analysis of trait names: Building on Cattell (1943). In Corr, P. (Ed.), Classic studies in personality psychology (pp. 47–68). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goffin, R. D., Rothstein, M. G., & Johnston, N. G. (2000). Predicting job performance using personality constructs: Are personality tests created equal? In Goffin, R. D. & Helmes, E. (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 249–264). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Exploratory factor analysis. In Nesselroade, J. R. & Cattell, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 231–258). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.Google Scholar
Grimm, K. J., Steele, J. S., Ram, N., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2013) Exploratory latent growth models in the structural equation modeling framework. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 568–591.Google Scholar
Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Haggbloom, S. J., Warnick, R., Warnick, J. E., Jones, V. K., Yarbrough, G. L., Russell, T. M., Borecky, C. M., McGahhey, R., Powell, J. L. III, Beavers, J., & Monte, E. (2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of General Psychology, 6, 139–152.Google Scholar
Hall, C. S., Lindzey, G., & Campbell, J. B. (1998). Theories of personality (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hartup, W. W., & van Lieshout, C. F. M. (1995). Personality development in social context. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 655–687.Google Scholar
Helmes, E. (2000). The role of social desirability in the assessment of personality constructs. In Goffin, R. D. & Helmes, E. (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 21–40). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Helmes, E. (2010). Response distortion in applications of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) in offender rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 101–120.Google Scholar
Helmes, E., & Reddon, J. R. (1993). A perspective on developments in assessing psychopathology: A critical review of the MMPI and MMPI-2. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 453–471.Google Scholar
Helmes, E., Holden, R. R., & Ziegler, M. (2015). Response bias, malingering, and impression management. In Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 16–43). Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar
Hojnoski, R. L., Morrison, R., Brown, M., & Matthews, W. J. (2006). Projective test use among school psychologists: A survey and critique. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 145–159.Google Scholar
Horowitz, L. M. (2004). Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hough, L., & Paullin, C. (1994). Construct-oriented scale construction: The rational approach. In Stokes, G. S., Mumford, M. D. & Owens, W. A. (Eds.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and used of biographical information in selection and performance (pp. 109–145). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Hunsley, J., Lee, C. M., & Wood, J. M. (2003). Controversial and questionable assessment techniques. In Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J. & Lohr, J. M. (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology (pp. 17–38). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2005). Introduction to the special section on developing guidelines for the evidence-based assessment (EBA) of adult disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17, 251–255.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1970). A sequential system for personality scale construction. In Spielberger, C. D. (Ed.), Current topic in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 61–96). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1989). Basic Personality Inventory manual. Port Huron, MI & London, Ontario, Canada: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory – Revised manual. Port Huron, MI & London, Ontario, Canada: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (2000). A perspective. In Goffin, R. D. & Helmes, E. (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 333–344). New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N., Ashton, M. C., & Tomes, J. L. (1996). The six-factor model of personality: Facets from the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 391–402.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N., & Messick, S. (1971). The Differential Personality Inventory. London, Ontario: Authors.Google Scholar
James, L. R. (1998). Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 131–163.Google Scholar
James, L. R., McIntyre, M. D., Glisson, C. A., Green, P. D., Patton, T. W., LeBreton, J. M., Frost, , … & Williams, L. J. (2005). A conditional reasoning measure for aggression. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 69–99.Google Scholar
Juni, S. (2006). Projective testing: A critique. Applied Psychology, 2, 789–793.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1959). Computer program for Varimax rotation in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 19, 413–420.Google Scholar
Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology and psychotherapy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Krug, S. E. (1980). Clinical Analysis Questionnaire manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Krug, S. E. (1981). Interpreting 16PF profile patterns. Champaign, IL, Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Krug, S. E. (2008). The assessment of clinical disorders within Raymond Cattell’s personality model. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (2008) (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality measurement and testing (pp. Vol. 2, 646–662). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kurtz, I. C., Dawson, D. V., & Welsh, K. A. (1994). Caregiver ratings of personality change in Alzheimer’s disease patients: A replication. Psychology and Aging, 9, 464–466.Google Scholar
Kurtz, J. E., Lee, P. A., & Sherker, J. L. (1999). Internal and temporal reliability estimates for informant ratings of personality using the NEO-PI-R and IAS. Assessment, 6, 103–114.Google Scholar
LeBreton, J. M., Barksdale, C. D., Robin, J., & James, L. R. (2007). Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: Indirect measurement and test faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1–16.Google Scholar
Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.Google Scholar
Lubin, B., Swearngin, S. E., & Zuckerman, M. (1997). Research with the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List (MAACL and the MAACL-R: 1960-1996). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
MacCallum, R. (1985). Some problems in the process of model modification in covariance structure modeling. Paper presented at the European Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1983). Multitrait–multimethod analysis: Distinguishing between items and traits. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 351–358.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1993). Multitrait–multimethod analyses: Inferring each trait-method combination with multiple indicators. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 49–81.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology. In Tenenbaum, G. & Eklund, R. C. (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 774–798). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (2008). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: An important facet of personality. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality theories and models (Vol. 1, pp. 447–469). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J. S., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110.Google Scholar
Mershon, B., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Number of factors in the personality sphere: Does increase in factors increase predictability of real-life criteria? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 675–680.Google Scholar
Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An introduction. In Hancock, G. R. & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 395–436). Greenwich, CT: IAP.Google Scholar
Mount, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Incremental validity of empirically keyed biodata scales over GMA and the five factor personality constructs. Personnel Psychology, 53, 299–323.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis. In Nesselroade, J. R. & Cattell, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. (1947). Personality: A biosocial approach to origins and structure. New York: Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. G., Licht, B. G., & Pearl, R. A. (1982). Some dangers of using personality questionnaires to study personality. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 572–580.Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. (1967). 2800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 598–609.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In Angleitner, A. & Wiggins, J. S. (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement (pp. 143–165). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding-7. User’s manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In Braun, H. I., Jackson, D. N. & Wiley, D. E. (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 46–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Paunonem, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the Big Five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68, 821–835.Google Scholar
Pilar-Matud, M. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1401–1415.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, C., & Keller, J. W. (1989). Psychological testing in outpatient mental health facilities: A national study. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 423–425.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children: Second edition manual. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Rudinger, G., & Dommel, N. (1986). An example of convergent and discriminant validation of personality questionnaires. In Angleitner, A. & Wiggins, J. S. (Eds.), Personality assessment via questionnaires: Current issues in theory and measurement (pp. 214–224). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Sajatovic, M., & Ramirez, L. F. (2003). Rating scales in mental health (2nd ed.). Hudson, OH: Lexi-Comp.Google Scholar
Savalei, V., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling. In Weiner, I. B. & Craighead, W. E. (Eds.), The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1714– 1716). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schuerger, J. M. (1986). Personality assessment by objective tests. In Cattell, R. B. & Johnson, R. C. (Eds.), Functional psychological testing: Principles and instruments (pp. 260–287). New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Schuerger, J. M. (2008). The Objective-Analytic Test Battery. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality measurement and testing (Vol. 2, pp. 529–546). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (1999). Frequency reports of physical symptoms and health behaviors: How the questionnaire determines the results. In Park, D. C., Morrell, R. W. & Shifrin, K. (Eds.), Processing of medical information in aging patients: Cognitive and human factors perspectives (pp. 93–108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Sudman, S. (1996) (Eds.) Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. (1988). Personality: Multivariate systems theory and research. In Nesselroade, J. R. & Cattell, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 687–736). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Stokes, G. S., Mumford, M. D., & Owens, W. A. (1994). Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, M. E., Pasupathi, M., & Chatterjee, A. (1993). Concordance between observers in descriptions of personality change in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychology and Aging, 8, 475–480.Google Scholar
Strauss, M. E., & Pasupathi, M. (1994). Primary caregivers’ descriptions of Alzheimer patients’ personality traits: Temporal stability and sensitivity to change. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 8, 166–176.Google Scholar
Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1931). Multiple factor analysis. Psychological Review, 38, 406–427.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tubré, T., Miotke, A., & Sawdy, M. (2017). Personality Research Form (PRF). In Zeigler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–2). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1–28.Google Scholar
Weiner, I. B. (1997). Current status of the Rorschach inkblot method. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 5–19.Google Scholar
Welleford, E. A., Harkins, S. W., & Taylor, J. R. (1995). Personality change in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: Relations to caregiver personality and burden. Experimental Aging Research, 21, 295–314.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1995). IAS. Interpersonal Adjective Scales: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Professional Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wirth, R. J., & Edwards, M. C. (2007). Item factor analysis: Current approaches and future directions. Psychological Methods, 12, 58–79.Google Scholar
Wittenborn, J. R. (1951). Symptom patterns in a group of mental hospital patients. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 15, 290–302.Google Scholar
Wood, J., Nezworkski, M., Lilienfeld, S., & Garb, H. (2003). What’s wrong with the Rorschach? Science confronts the controversial inkblot test. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1965). Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1985). Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List – Revised. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1999). Manual for the MAACL-R Multiple Affect Adjective Check List San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar

References

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47 (Whole No. 211).Google Scholar
Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. (1995). The Big Seven Model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language of trait descriptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 300–307.Google Scholar
Aluja, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-P): A factor/facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 416–431.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707–721.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.Google Scholar
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Benet-Martinez, V., & Waller, N. G. (1997). Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the Big Seven model: Indigenous and imported Spanish personality constructs. Journal of Personality, 65, 567–598.Google Scholar
Bertels, K., & Nauta, D. (1969). Inleiding tot het modelbegrip [Introduction to the model concept]. Amsterdam: Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij B.V.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality disorder. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–507.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 58, 69–90.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1950). Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1994). Constancy of global, second-order personality factors over a twenty-year-plus period. Psychological Reports, 75, 3–9.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1995). The fallacy of five factors in the personality sphere. The Psychologist, May, 207–208.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). The handbook for the sixteen personality factor (16PF) questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., & Reyes, J. A. S. (1996). Toward a taxonomy of trait adjectives in Filipino: Comparing personality lexicons across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 10, 3–24.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1976). Age differences in personality structure: A cluster analytic approach. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 564–570.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
De Raad, B. (2000). The Big Five personality factors. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits base on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 347–364.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlačić, B., Di Blas, L., … Katigbak, M. S. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–173.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Timmerman, M. E., De Roover, K., Mlačić, B., & Church, A. T. (2014). Towards a pan-cultural personality structure: Input from 11 psycho-lexical studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497–510.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Hendriks, A. A. J., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (1992). Towards a refined structure of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 6, 301–319.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (1993). A circumplex approach to the five factor model: A facet structure of trait adjectives supplemented by trait verbs. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 493–505.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Mulder, E., Kloosterman, K., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (1988). Personality-descriptive verbs. European Journal of Personality, 2, 81–96.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Peabody, D. (2005). Cross-culturally recurrent personality factors: Analyses of three factors. European Journal of Personality, 19, 451–474.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Perugini, M. (2002). Big Five Assessment. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Perugini, M., & Szirmák, Z. (1997). In pursuit of a cross-lingual reference structure of personality traits: Comparisons among five languages. European Journal of Personality, 11, 167–185.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Perugini, M., Hrébicková, M., & Szarota, P. (1998). Lingua franca of personality: Taxonomies and structures based on the psycholexical approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 212–232.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Szirmák, Z. (1994). The search for the “Big Five” in a non-Indo-European language: The Hungarian trait structure and its relationship to the EPQ and the PTS. European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 17–24.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., Barelds, D., Mlačić, B., Di Blas, L., Hřebičková, M., Ostendorf, F., Szirmák, Z., & Szarota, P. (2018). Take 2 personality factors: A study of two fundamental ways of trait differentiation in eleven trait taxonomies. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 4, 39–55.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.Google Scholar
Di Blas, L., & Forzi, M. (1999). Refining a descriptive structure of personality attributes in the Italian language: The abridged Big Three circumplex structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 451–481.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1953). The structure of human personality. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1959). Manual for the Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1970). The Structure of Human Personality (3rd ed.). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16-, 5- or 3- criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773–790.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In Pervin, L. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 244–276). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–344.Google Scholar
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In Wheeler, L. (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of personality traits: Vertical and horizontal aspects. In Funder, D. C., Parke, R. D., Tomlinson-Keasey, C. & Widaman, K. (Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 169–188). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (2006). Doing it all bass-ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 347–358.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R., & Rosolack, T. K. (1994). The Big Five factor structure as an integrative framework: An empirical comparison with Eysenck’s P-E-N model. In Halverson, C. F. Jr., Kohnstamm, G. A. & Martin, R. P. (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 7–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–277). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1975). Factors and factors of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 802–814.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P., & Guilford, R. B. (1936). Personality factors S, E, and M, and their measurement. The Journal of Psychology, 2, 109–127.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1949). The Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey: Manual. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Supply.Google Scholar
Hampson, S. E., John, O. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 37–54.Google Scholar
Hofer, S. M., & Eber, H. W. (2002). Second-order factor structure of the Cattell Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. In De Raad, B. & Perugini, M. (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 397–409). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
Hofstee, W. K. B. (2001). Intelligence and personality: Do they mix? In Collis, J. M. & Messick, S. (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement (pp. 43–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hofstee, W. K. B. (2003). Structures of personality traits. In Millon, T. & Lerner, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Personality and social Psychology (Vol. 5. pp. 213–254). John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hofstee, W. K. B., Kiers, H. A. L., De Raad, B., Goldberg, L. R., & Ostendorf, F. (1997). Comparison of Big-Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11, 15–31.Google Scholar
Hofstee, W. K. B., & Ten Berge, J. M. F. (2004). Personality in proportion: A bipolar proportional scale for personality assessments and its consequences for trait structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 120–127.Google Scholar
Hofstee, W. K. B., Ten Berge, J. M. F., & Hendriks, A. A. J. (1998). How to score questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 897–909.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–205.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Karson, S. (1961). Second-order personality factors in positive mental health. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17, 14–19.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, E. (1948). Körperbau und charakter [Constitution and character]. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Krug, S. E., & Johns, E. F. (1986). A large scale cross-validation of second-order personality structure defined by the 16PF. Psychological Reports, 59, 683–693.Google Scholar
Lave, C. A., & March, J. G. (1975). An introduction to models in the social sciences. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1985). Updating Norman’s “adequate taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.Google Scholar
Mlačić, B., & Ostendorf, F. (2005). Taxonomy and structure of Croatian personality-descriptive adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 19, 117–152.Google Scholar
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. (1967). 2,800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Ostendorf, F. (1990). Sprache und persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur validität des fünf-faktoren modells der persönlichkeit [Language and personality structure: Towards the validity of the five-factor model of personality]. Regensburg, Germany: Roderer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Panter, A. T., Tanaka, J. S., & Hoyle, R. H. (1994). Structural models for multimode designs in personality and temperament research. In Halverson, C. F. Jr., Kohnstamm, G. A. & Martin, R. P. (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 111–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Peabody, D. (1987). Selecting representative trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 59–71.Google Scholar
Peabody, D., & De Raad, B. (2002). The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: A comparison across languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 983–997.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., Georgiades, S., Tsaousis, I., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The factor structure of Greek personality adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 856–875.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10, 61–77.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A. G.,Payne, D. L., Carlson, R., Sanogo, L., Ole-Kotikash, L., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Somer, O., Szarota, P., Szirmák, Z., & Zhou, X. (2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82, 1–14.Google Scholar
Sells, S. B., Demaree, R. G., & Will, D. P. Jr. (1970). Dimensions of personality: I. Conjoint factor structure of Guilford and Cattell trait markers. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 5, 391–422.Google Scholar
Sells, S. B., Demaree, R. G., & Will, D. P. Jr. (1971). Dimensions of personality: II. Separate factor structures in Guilford and Cattell trait markers. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 6, 135–185.Google Scholar
Somer, O., & Goldberg, L. R. (1999). The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 431–450.Google Scholar
Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1986). Rotation to perfect congruence and the cross-validation of components weights across populations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 41–64; 262–266.Google Scholar
Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781–790.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. C. (1958). Stability of personality trait rating factors obtained under diverse conditions (USAF ASTIA Document No. AD 151 041), U.S. Air Force, Lackland, Air Force Base, TX.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. C. (1961). Recurrent Personality Factors Based on Trait Ratings (USAF ASD Technical Report, No. 61–97). U.S. Air Force, Lackland Air Force Base, TX.Google Scholar
Webb, E. (1915). Character and intelligence: An attempt at an exact study of character. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1968). Personality structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 19, 293–350.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (Ed.) (1996) . The Five-Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S., & Trapnell, P. D. (1996). A dyadic-Interactional perspective on the Five-Factor Model. In Wiggins, J. S. (Ed.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88–162). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 45–52.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (2005). Psychobiology of personality (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., & Glicksohn, J. (2016). Hans Eysenck’s personality model and the constructs of sensation seeking and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 48–52.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Kolin, E. A., Price, L., & Zoob, I. (1964). Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 477–482.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., & Camac, C. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96–107.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757–768.Google Scholar

References

Allen, T. A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2017). Personality neuroscience and the Five-Factor Model. In Widiger, T. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model (pp. 319–349). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allik, J., Church, A. T., Ortiz, F. A., Rossier, J., Hřebíčková, M., de Fruyt, F., Realo, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Mean profiles of the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 402–420.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (2000, July). The FFM: A comparison of German speaking countries (Austria, Former East and West Germany, and Switzerland). Paper presented at the XXVIIth International Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. B., Caspi, A., & Hofstee, W. K. B. (2002). The puzzle of personality types [Special Issue]. European Journal of Personality, 16 (S1).Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). Honesty–Humility, the Big Five, and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321–1353.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The HEXACO model of personality structure and the importance of the H factor. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1952–1962.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blass, L., … De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.Google Scholar
Ball, S. A. (2002). Big Five, Alternative Five, and seven personality dimensions: Validity in substance-dependent patients. In Costa, P. T. Jr. & Widiger, T. A. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 177–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.Google Scholar
Bartram, D. (2013). Scalar equivalence of OPQ32: Big Five profiles of 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 61–83.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.Google Scholar
Biesanz, J. C., & West, S. G. (2004). Towards understanding assessments of the Big Five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality, 72, 845–876.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.Google Scholar
Cervone, D. (2004). Personality assessment: Tapping the social-cognitive architecture of personality. Behavior Therapy, 35, 113–129.Google Scholar
Cheung, F., Cheung, S. F., Leung, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. (2003). The English version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 433–452.Google Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W. Z., Zhang, J. X., & Zhang, J. P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.Google Scholar
Church, A. T., Alvarez, J.M., Mai, N. T., French, B. F., Katigbak, M. S., & Ortiz, F.A. (2011). Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1068–1089.Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Author.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. (2016). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1427–1440.Google Scholar
Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N. (2012). Neuroscience and approach/avoidance personality traits: A two stage (valuation–motivation) approach. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2339–2354.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980a). Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980b). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In Baltes, P. B. & Brim, O. G. Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 65–102). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Trait psychology comes of age. In Sonderegger, T. B. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and aging (pp. 169–204). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2019). Personality across the life span. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 423–448.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Peabody, D. (2005). Cross-culturally recurrent personality factors: Analyses of three factors. European Journal of Personality, 19, 451–474.Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Perugini, M. (Eds.) (2002). Big Five assessment. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116–123.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1967.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1980). On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. Journal of Personality, 48, 473–493.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1983, June). The magical number five, plus or minus two: Some considerations on the dimensionality of personality descriptors. Paper presented at a Research Seminar, Gerontology Research Center, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (2002). Implications of personality individual differences science for clinical work on personality disorders. In Costa, P. T. Jr. & Widiger, T. A. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (2nd ed., pp. 391–403). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Hirsh, J. B. (2014). Environmental sustainability and national personality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 233–240.Google Scholar
Hřebíčková, M., & Graf, S. (2014). Accuracy of national stereotypes in central Europe: Outgroups are not better than ingroup in considering personality traits of real people. European Journal of Personality, 28, 60–72.Google Scholar
Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Ando, J., Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Angleitner, A., … Spinath, F. (2006). Behavioral genetics of the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 261–272.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203.Google Scholar
Juni, S. (1996). Review of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. In Conoley, J. C. & Impara, J. C. (Eds.), 12th Mental Measurements Yearbook (pp. 863–868). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Keiser, H. N., & Ross, S. R. (2011). Carver and White’s BIS/FFFS/BAS scales and domains and facets of the Five-Factor Model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 39–44.Google Scholar
Kurtz, J. E., & Sherker, J. L. (2003). Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreement on personality traits in college roommates. Journal of Personality, 71, 21–48.Google Scholar
Lanning, K. (1994). Dimensionality of observer ratings on the California Adult Q-Set. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 151–160.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.Google Scholar
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1982). Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 293–303.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the Five-Factor Model: Joint analyses of the NEO-PI and other instruments. In Buss, D. M. & Cantor, N. (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 237–245). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1990). Traits and trait names: How well is Openness represented in natural languages? European Journal of Personality, 4, 119–129.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential Openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In McCrae, R. R. & Allik, J. (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 105–126). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2007). Aesthetic chills as a universal marker of Openness to Experience. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 5–11.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2009). Personality profiles of cultures: Patterns of ethos. European Journal of Personality, 23, 205–227.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 97–112.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2017). The Five-Factor Model across cultures. In Church, A. T. (Ed.), Praeger handbook of personality across cultures (Vol. 1, pp. 47–72). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (2018). Defining traits. In Ziegler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. (Eds.), Sage handbook of individual differences (pp. 3–22). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Allik, J. (Eds.) (2002). The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Chan, W., Jussim, L., De Fruyt, F., Löckenhoff, C. E., De Bolle, M., … Terracciano, A. (2013). The inaccuracy of national character stereotypes. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 831–842.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1988). Age, personality, and the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 43, S177–S185.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17–40.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1995). Positive and negative valence within the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 443–460.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008a). Empirical and theoretical status of the Five-Factor Model of personality traits. In Boyle, G. J., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. H. (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 273–294). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2008b). The Five-Factor Theory of personality. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. & Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2010). NEO Inventories professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., & Busch, C. M. (1986). Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q-Set and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 54, 430–446.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Herbst, J. H., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2001). Effects of acquiescence on personality factor structures. In Riemann, R., Ostendorf, F. & Spinath, F. (Eds.), Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and structure (pp. 217–231). Berlin: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28–50.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Scally, M., Terracciano, A., Abecasis, G. A., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (2010). An alternative to the search for single polymorphisms: Toward molecular personality scales for the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1014–1024.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2008). The Five-Factor Model and its correlates in individuals and cultures. In van de Vijver, F. J. R., van Hemert, D. A. & Poortinga, Y. (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 249–283). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., Gelfand, M. J., Costa, P. T. Jr., & 42 Collaborators of the Adolescent Personality Profiles of Cultures project. (2010). The validity and structure of culture-level personality scores: Data from ratings of young adolescents. Journal of Personality, 78, 815–838.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2007). Climatic warmth and national wealth: Some culture-level determinants of national character stereotypes; Response: On the validity of culture-level personality and stereotype scores. European Journal of Personality, 21, 953–976; 987–991.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407–425.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Yamagata, S., Jang, K. L., Riemann, R., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. (2008). Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 442–455.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mõttus, R. (2016). Towards more rigorous trait-outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30, 292–303.Google Scholar
Mõttus, R., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, M., Riemann, R., & McCrae, R. R. (2017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 474–490.Google Scholar
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Niszczota, P. (2014). Cross-country differences in personality and the foreign bias in international equity portfolios. The European Journal of Finance, 20, 934–956.Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.Google Scholar
Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539.Google Scholar
Pettersson, E., Turkheimer, E., Horn, E. E., & Menatti, A. R. (2012). The general factor of personality and evaluation. European Journal of Personality, 26, 292–302.Google Scholar
Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013.Google Scholar
Pilia, G., Chen, W.-M., Scuteri, A., Orrú, M., Albai, G., Deo, M., et al. (2006). Heritability of cardiovascular and personality traits in 6,148 Sardinians. PLoS Genetics, 2, 1207–1223.Google Scholar
Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1997). Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self- and peer report NEO-FFI scales. Journal of Personality, 65, 449–475.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Stark, S. E. (2004). A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of Conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 164–178.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of Conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103–139.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Personality traits change in adulthood: Reply to Costa and McCrae (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132, 29–32.Google Scholar
Rossberger, R. J. (2014). National personality profiles and innovation: The role of cultural practices. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23, 331–348.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.Google Scholar
Singer, J. A. (2005). Personality and psychotherapy: Treating the whole person. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, T., Griffin, S. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2017). Capturing the DSM‐5 Alternative Personality Disorder model traits in the Five‐Factor Model’s nomological net. Journal of Personality, 85, 220–231.Google Scholar
Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalak, A. M., Ádám, N., Adamovová, L., Ahn, C.-k., Ahn, H.-n., et al. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310, 96–100.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961) Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61–97, Lackland Airforce Base, TX: US Air Force.Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225–251.Google Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H. & Pandey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Theory and method (pp. 257–300). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J. & Briggs, S. R. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 767–793). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A. (Ed.) (2017). The Oxford handbook of the Five-Factor Model. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T. Jr., Gore, W. L., & Crego, C. (2013). Five-Factor Model personality disorder research. In Widiger, T. A. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 75–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Gardner, M. H., & Harms, P. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111.Google Scholar
Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K., et al. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 987–998.Google Scholar

References

Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.Google Scholar
Allik, J., & Realo, A. (1997). Intelligence, academic abilities, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 809–814.Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Anastasi, A. (1968). Psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anastasi, A. (1970). On the formation of psychological traits. American Psychologist, 25, 899–910.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (1992). Intelligence and development: A cognitive theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anthony, J. J. (1973). A comparison of Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence and Stanford Binet intelligence scale scores for disadvantaged school children. Psychology in the Schools, 10, 297–299.Google Scholar
Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Gibson, G. J. (1997). Relationships between ability and personality: Three hypotheses tested. Intelligence, 25, 49–70.Google Scholar
Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M.C., Fowkes, F. G. R., Pedersen, N. L., Rabbitt, P., Bent, N., & McInnes, L. (2002). Relationships between ability and personality: Does intelligence contribute positively to personal and social adjustment? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1391–1411.Google Scholar
Austin, E. J., Hofer, S. M., Deary, I. J., & Eber, H. W. (2000). Interactions between intelligence and personality: Results from two large samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 405–427.Google Scholar
Baron, J. (1984). Personality and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed)., Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 308–351). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, M., van Weegen, F. I., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Carlier, M., Polderman, T. J. C., Hoekstra, R. A., & Boomsma, D. I. (2012). The Five-Factor Model of personality and intelligence: A twin study on the relationship between the two constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 368–373.Google Scholar
Blas, L. D., & Carraro, D. (2011). Relations between nonverbal intelligence and personality reports in late childhood. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 112–116.Google Scholar
Block, J., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connection and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349–361.Google Scholar
Bolton, B. (1980). Personality (16PF) correlates of WAIS scales: A replication. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 399–401.Google Scholar
Bonaccio, S., & Reeve, C.L. (2006). Differentiation of cognitive abilities as a function of neuroticism level: A measurement equivalence/invariance analysis. Intelligence, 34, 403–417.Google Scholar
Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (1995). Longitudunal studies of personality and intelligence: A behavior genetic and evolutionary psychology perspective. In Saklofske, D. H. & Zeidner, M. (Eds)., International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 81–654). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Brand, C. (1994). Open to experience – closed to intelligence: Why the “big five” are really the “comprehensive six.” European Journal of Personality, 8, 299–310.Google Scholar
Brand, C., Egan, V., & Deary, I. J. (1993). Personality and general intelligence. In Van Heck, G. L., Bonaiuto, P., Deary, I. J. & Nowack, W. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 4, pp. 203–228). Tiburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Brand, C., Egan, V., & Deary, I. J. (1994). Intelligence, personality, and society: Constructivist versus essentialist possibilities. In Detterman, D. K. (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence: Theories of intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 29–42). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bratko, D., Butkovic, A., Vukasovic, T., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & von Stumm, S. (2012). Cognitive ability, self-assessed intelligence and personality: Common genetic but independent environmental aetiologies. Intelligence, 40, 91–99.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1954). The differentiation of intellectual ability. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 76–90.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. New York: Elsvier Science.Google Scholar
Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1994). Toward an integrative model of personality and intelligence: A general framework and some preliminary steps. In Sternberg, R. J. & Ruzgis, P. (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (pp. 104–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. (1974). Factor analysis of measures of aptitude, intelligence, personality, and performance in highschool subjects. Journal of Experimental Education, 42, 7–10.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Egan, V., Gibson, G. J., Austin, E. J., Brand, C., & Kellaghan, T. (1996). Intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis. Intelligence, 23, 105–132.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., & Pagliari, C. (1991). The strength of g at different levels of ability: Have Detterman and Daniel rediscovered Spearman’s “Law of diminishing returns”? Intelligence, 15, 247–250.Google Scholar
Detterman, D. K. (1991). Reply to Deary and Pagliari: Is g intelligence or stupidity? Intelligence, 15, 251–255.Google Scholar
Detterman, D. K., & Daniel, M. H. (1989). Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low IQ groups. Intelligence, 13, 349–359.Google Scholar
de Vries, R. E. (2011). No support for a general factor of personality in a reanalysis of van der Linden et al. (2010). Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 512–516.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 46–52.Google Scholar
Djapo, N., Kolenovic-Djapo, J., Djokic, R., & Fako, I. (2011). Relationship between Cattell’s 16PF and fluid and crystalized intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 63–67.Google Scholar
Donahue, D., & Sattler, J. M. (1971). Personality variables affecting WAIS scores. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 441.Google Scholar
Dunkel, C. S., van der Linden, D., Beaver, K. M., Woodley, M. A. (2014). Using a prison sample to assess the association between the general factor of personality and general intelligence. Intelligence, 47, 72–82.Google Scholar
Escorial, S., García, L.F., Cuevas, L., & Juan-Espinosa, M. (2006). Personality level on the Big Five and the structure of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 909–917.Google Scholar
Evans, R. G., & Forbach, G. B. (1982). Intellectual ability correlates of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 59–62.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). The relationship between IQ and personality. In Van Heck, G. L., Bonainto, P., Deary, I. J. & Nowack, W. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 4, pp. 159–181). Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & White, P. O. (1964). Personality and the measurement of intelligence. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 197–202. Reprinted in (1973) H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), The measurement of intelligence (pp. 185–190). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. A. (1954). On learning and human ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 8, 95–112.Google Scholar
Filella, J. F. (1960). Educational and sex differences in the organization of abilities in technical and academic students in Columbia, South America. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 61, 115–163.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Personality, intelligence and general knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 79–90.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (1998). Personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 187–192.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Cheng, H. (2016). Childhood intelligence predicts adult trait openness psychological and demographic indicators. Journal of Individual Differences, 37, 105–111.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Moutafi, J. (2012). Personality, age, and fluid intelligence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 64, 128–137.Google Scholar
Furnham, A., & Thorne, J. D. (2013). Need for cognition: Its dimensionality and personality and intelligence correlates. Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 230–240.Google Scholar
Garrett, H. E. (1946). A developmental theory of intelligence. American Psychologist, 1, 372–378.Google Scholar
Gormly, J., & Gormly, A. (1986). Social introversion and spatial abilities. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 273–274.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 913–929.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A., Steinmayr, R., & Amelang, M. (2006). Inter- and intraindividual differences in personality in two German samples of high and low intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 433–440.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A., Vernon, P. A., & Jang, K. L. (1998). A multivariate genetic analysis of correlations between intelligence and personality. Developmental Neuropsychology, 14, 127–142.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A., Vernon, P. A., & Jang, K. L. (2005). Testing the differentiation of personality by intelligence hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 277–286.Google Scholar
Garrett, H. E. (1946). A developmental theory of intelligence. American Psychologist, 1, 372–378.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A., Vernon, P.A., Olson, J. M., & Jang, K. L. (1999). Self-rated personality and intelligence: A multivariate genetic analysis. European Journal of Personality, 13, 121–128.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.Google Scholar
Holden, R. R., & Marjanovic, Z. (2012). A putatively general factor of personality (GFP) is not so general: A demonstration with the NEO PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 37–40.Google Scholar
Holland, D. C., Dollinger, S. J., Holland, C. J., & MacDonald, D. A. (1995). The relationship between psychometric intelligence and the Five-Factor Model of personality in a rehabilitation sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 79–88.Google Scholar
Honzik, M. P., & Macfarlane, J. W. (1973). Personality development and intellectual functioning from 21 months to 40 years. In Jarvik, L. F., Eisdorfer, C. & Blum, J. E. (Eds.), Intellectual functioning in adults (pp. 45–58). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1989). Personality research form manual (3rd ed.). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1973). Personality and scholastic achievement in three ethnic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 115–125.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. C., Nagoshi, C. T., Ahern, F. M. & Wilson, J. R. (1983). Correlations of measures of personality and intelligence within and across generations. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 331–338.Google Scholar
Kandel, E., Mednick, S. A., Kirkegaard-Soreensen, L., Hutchings, B., Knop, J., Rosenberg, R., & Schulsinger, F. (1988). IQ as a protective factor for subjects at high risk for antisocial behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 224–226.Google Scholar
Kornilova, T. V., & Novikova, M. A. (2012). Self-assessed intelligence, personality, and psychometric intelligence: Preliminary validation of a model with a selected student population. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6, 33–49.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, A., Spengler, M., Schubert, A., Steinmayr, R., & Ziegler, M. (2018). The relationship of personality and intelligence: What can the Brunswik symmetry principle tell us? Journal of Intelligence, 6, 30–68.Google Scholar
Lechner, C. M., & Rammstedt, B. (2015). Cognitive ability, acquiescence, and the structure of personality in a sample of older adults. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1301–1311.Google Scholar
Ley, P., Spelman, M. S., Davies, A. D. M., & Riley, S. (1966). The relationships between intelligence, anxiety, neuroticism and extraversion. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 36, 185–191.Google Scholar
Loehlin, J. C., Bartels, M., Boomsma, D. I., Bratko, D., Martin, N. G., Nichols, R. C., & Wright, M. J. (2015). Is there a genetic correlation between general factors of intelligence and personality? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 18, 234–242.Google Scholar
Lohman, D. F., & Rocklin, T. (1995). Current and recurring issues in the assessment of intelligence and personality. In Saklofske, D. H. & Zeidner, M. (Eds)., International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 447–474). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, R. (1992). Does Spearman’s g decline at high IQ levels? Some evidence from Scotland. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 229–230.Google Scholar
Lynn, R., Hampson, S. L., & Magee, M. (1983). Determinants of educational achievement at 16+: intelligence, personality, home background and school. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 473–481.Google Scholar
MacCann, C., Pearce, N., & Jiang, Y. (2017). The general factor of personality is stronger and more strongly correlated with cognitive ability under instructed faking. Journal of Individual Differences, 38, 46–54.Google Scholar
Maciel, A. G., Heckhausen, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). A life-span perspective on the interface between personality and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. & Ruzgis, P. (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (pp. 61–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Major, J. T., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2014). Linear and nonlinear associations between general intelligence and personality in project TALENT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 638–654.Google Scholar
McLarnon, M. J. W., & Carswell, J. J. (2013). The personality differentiation by intelligence hypothesis: A measurement invariance investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 557–561.Google Scholar
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2003). Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: A study using the NEO Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. European Journal of Personality, 17, 79–94.Google Scholar
Murray, A. L., Booth, T., & Molenaar, D. (2016). Personality differentiation by cognitive ability: An application of the moderated factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 73–78.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J. (1987). Personality, intelligence, and spatial visualization: Correlates of mental rotations test performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 129–134.Google Scholar
Paisley, T. J. H. (1983). The diffuse thalamocortical system and Pavlovian theory: Let sleeping dogs lie. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 527–534.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D., Lysy, D., & Yik, M. (1998). Self-report measures of intelligence: Are they useful as proxy IQ tests? Journal of Personality, 66, 523–555.Google Scholar
Plant, W. T., & Minium, E. W. (1967). Differential personality development in young adults of markedly different aptitude levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 141–152.Google Scholar
Powell, C., & Nettelbeck, T. (2014). Intellectural curiosity may not incrementally predict academic success. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 7–11.Google Scholar
Rawlings, D., & Skok, M. (1993). Extraversion, venturesomeness and intelligence in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 389–396.Google Scholar
Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. (2013). The general factor of personality: A general critique. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 493–504.Google Scholar
Rikoon, S. H., Brenneman, M., Kim, L. E., Khorramdel, L., MacCann, C., Burrus, J., & Roberts, R. D. (2016). Facets of conscientiousness and their differential relationships with cognitive ability factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 22–34.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. L. (1982). Properties of the diffuse thalamocortical system and human personality: A direct test of Pavlovian/Eysenckian theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
Robinson, D. L. (1985). How personality relates to intelligence test performance: Implications for a theory of intelligence, ageing research and personality assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 203–216.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., & Hur, Y. M. (2008). The genetics and evolution of the General Factor of Personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1173–1185.Google Scholar
Saklofske, D. H., & Kostura, D. D. (1990). Extraversion–introversion and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 547–551.Google Scholar
Samuel, W. (1980). Mood and personality correlates of IQ by race and sex of subject. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 993–1004.Google Scholar
Scarr, S. (1996). How people make their own environments: Implications for parents and policy makers. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 204–228.Google Scholar
Schermer, J. A., Bratko, D., & Bojić, J.M. (2020). A test of the differentiation of personality by intelligence hypothesis using the Big Five personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109764.Google Scholar
Schermer, J. A., Carswell, J., & Jackson, S. (2012). Correlations between a general factor of personality and employment measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 557–561.Google Scholar
Schermer, J. A., & Goffin, R. D. (2018). A tale of two General Factors of Personality in relation to intelligence and validity measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 111–116.Google Scholar
Schermer, J. A., Holden, R. R., & Krammer, G. (2019). The General Factor of Personality is very robust under faking conditions. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 63–68.Google Scholar
Schermer, J. A., Krammer, G., & Goffin, R. D. (2019). The General Factor of Personality and faking: A cautionary note on meaningfulness of the GFP under different response conditions. Personality and Individual Differences, 137, 110–114.Google Scholar
Schermer, J. A., & Macdougall, R. (2013). A general factor of personality, social desirability, cognitive ability, and the survey of work styles in an employment selection setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 141–144.Google Scholar
Schermer, J. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2010). The correlation between general intelligence (g), a general factor of personality (GFP), and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 187–189.Google Scholar
Shure, G. H., & Rogers, M. S. (1963). Personality factor stability for three ability levels. The Journal of Psychology, 55, 445–456.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Spengler, M., Brunner, M., Damian, R. I., Lüdtke, O., Martin, R., & Roberts, B. W. (2015). Student characteristics and behaviors at age 12 predict occupational success 40 years later over and above childhood IQ and parental socioeconomic status. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1329–1340.Google Scholar
Turner, R. G., Willerman, L., & Horn, J. M. (1976). Personality correlates of WAIS performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 349–354.Google Scholar
van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The General Factor of Personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1950). Cognitive, conative, and non-intellective intelligence. American Psychologist, 5, 78–83.Google Scholar
Wettstein, M., Tauber, B., Kuźma, E., & Wahl, H. (2017). The interplay between personality and cognitive ability across 12 years in middle and late adulthood: Evidence for reciprocal associations. Psychology and Aging, 32, 259–277.Google Scholar
Windholz, G. (1968). The relation of creativity and intelligence constellations to traits of temperament, interest, and value in college students. The Journal of General Psychology, 79, 291–299.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×