Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:47:27.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Personality and Politics

from Part VI - Social and Cultural Processes: Personality at the Intersection of Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
Gian Vittorio Caprara  and
Michele Vecchione
Edited by
Philip J. Corr  and
Gerald Matthews
Philip J. Corr
Affiliation:
City, University London
Gerald Matthews
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida
Get access

Summary

Personality assumes an increasingly central role in the analysis of political behavior as traits and values may be more influential than traditional sociodemographic characteristics, such as gender, age, educational level, occupation and income in explaining ideological orientation and political preferences (Caprara, Schwartz, Capanna, Vecchione & Barbaranelli, 2006; Caprara, Schwartz, Vecchione & Barbaranelli, 2008). Ultimately, personality seems to play a crucial role with regard to both the distinctive features of democratic systems – namely, the freedom of voice allowed to citizens by expressing their preferences and priorities about how society should be governed and by choosing the representatives that mostly suits their opinions and interests.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , pp. 413 - 424
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, R. A. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–91). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aspelund, A., Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2013). Political conservatism and left–right orientation in 28 eastern and western European countries. Political Psychology, 34, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). Voters’ personality traits in presidential elections. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1199–1208.Google Scholar
Barber, J. D. (1965). The lawmakers. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, J. D. (1985). The presidential character: Predicting performance in the white house (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Barnea, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17–40.Google Scholar
Best, H. (2011). Does personality matter in politics? Personality factors as determinants of parliamentary recruitment and policy preferences. Comparative Sociology, 10, 942–962.Google Scholar
Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 734–749.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brewster-Smith, M. (1968). A map for the analysis of personality and politics. Journal of Social Issues, 24, 15–28.Google Scholar
Browning, R., & Jacob, H. (1964). Power motivation and the political personality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 28, 75–90.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20, 175–197.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Consiglio, C., Picconi, L., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Personalities of politicians and voters: Unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 849–856.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Francescato, D., Mebane, M., Sorace, R., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Personality foundation of ideological divide: A comparison of women members of parliament and women voters in Italy. Political Psychology, 31, 739–762.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006) Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S. H., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2008). The personalization of politics: Lessons from the Italian case. European Psychologist, 3, 157–172.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2017). Personalizing politics and realizing democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2018). On the left and right ideological divide: Historical accounts and contemporary perspectives. Political Psychology, 39, 49–83.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Capanna, C., & Mebane, M. (2009). Perceived political self-efficacy: Theory, assessment, and applications. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1002–1020.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). The mediational role of values in linking personality traits to political orientation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 82–94.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Why people do not vote: The role of personal values. European Psychologist, 17, 266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Schoen, H., Bain, P., Silvester, J., Cieciuch, J., … Caprara, M. G. (2017). Basic values, ideology, and voting: A cross-cultural study. Cross-Cultural Research, 51, 388–411.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., & Zimbardo, P. (2004). Personalizing politics. American Psychologist, 59, 581–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carney, D., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., Niederhoffer, K., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interpersonal styles, and the things they have behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840.Google Scholar
Cocks, G. (1986). Contribution of psychohistory to understanding politics. In Hermann, M. G. (Ed.), Political Psychology (pp. 139–166). San Francisco, NC: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Conway, L. G. III, Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2001). Integrative complexity and political decisions that lead to war or peace. In Christie, D. J. (Ed.), Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 66–75). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Costantini, E., & Craik, K. H. (1980). Personality and politicians: California party leaders, 1960–1976. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 641–661.Google Scholar
Dietrich, B. J., Lasley, S., Mondak, J. J., Remmel, M. L., & Turner, J. (2012). Personality and legislative politics: The Big Five trait dimensions among U.S. state legislators. Political Psychology, 33, 195–210.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the Five Factors Model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.Google Scholar
Di Renzo, G. (1963). Personalità e potere politico [Personality and political leadership]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Di Renzo, G. (1977). Politicians and personality: A cross cultural perspective. In Hermann, M. G. (Ed.), A psychological examination of political leaders (pp. 147–204). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological basis of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1969). Gandhi’s truth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Etheredge, L. S. (1978). Personality effects on American foreign policy, 1898–1968: A test of interpersonal generalization theory. American Political Science Review 72, 434–451.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. (1954). The psychology of politics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416–440.Google Scholar
Feldman, O. (1996). The political personality of Japan: An inquiry into the belief systems of Diet Members. Political Psychology, 17, 657–682.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and structure of political attitudes. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. & Jervis, R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallego, A., & Oberski, D. (2012). Personality and political participation: The mediation hypothesis. Political Behavior, 34, 425–451.Google Scholar
George, A. L., & George, J. L. (1956). Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: A personality study. New York: John Day.Google Scholar
George, A. L., & George, J. L. (1998). Presidential personality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011). Big Five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265–287.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S, Huber, G., Doherty, D., Dowling, C., & Ha, S. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111–133.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S, Huber, G., Ha, S., Dowling, C., & Doherty, D. (2009). Personality traits and the dimensions of political ideology. Available at SSRN: http:// ssrn.com/ abstract=1412863Google Scholar
Glad, B. (1973). Contributions of psychobiography. In Knutson, J. N. (Ed.), Handbook of political psychology (pp. 296–321). San Francisco, NC: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological motives and political orientation – the Left, the Right, and the Rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 376–382.Google Scholar
Greenstein, F. I. (1975). Personality and Politics. In Greenstein, F. I. & Polsby, N. W. (Eds.), The handbook of political science (Vol. 2, pp. 1–92). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative ideology on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 5–20.Google Scholar
Ha, S. E., Kim, S., & Jo, S. H. (2013). Personality traits and political participation: Evidence from South Korea. Political Psychology, 34, 511–532.Google Scholar
Hermann, M. G. (Ed.) (1977). A psychological examination of political leaders. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, H., Humphreys, P., Jaeger, M., & Katz, M. (1981). How voters decide: A longitudinal study of political attitudes and voting extending over fifteen years. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Basevich, E., Dickson, E. S., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2015). The place of values in a world of politics: Personality, motivation, and ideology. In Brosch, T. & Sander, D. (Eds.), Handbook of value: The affective sciences of values and valuation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Political conservativism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule – using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383–393.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–233.Google Scholar
Knight, K. (1985). Ideology in the 1980 election: Ideological sophistication does matter. Journal of Politics, 47, 828–853.Google Scholar
Knutsen, O. (1995). Party choice. In van Deth, J. W. & Scarbrough, E. (Eds.), The impact of values (pp. 460–491). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knutson, J. (1973) Handbook of political psychology. San Francisco, NC: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A. (1990). Expertise and political psychology. Social Cognition, 8, 1–8.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1930). Psychopathology and politics. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and personality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R. (2003) Models of decision-making. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. & Jervis, R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 19–59). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., & Sears, D. O. (Eds.) (1986). Political cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lavine, H., Burgess, D., Snyder, M., Transue, J., Sullivan, J., Haney, B., & Wagner, S. H. (1999). Threat, authoritarianism, and voting: An investigation of personality and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 337–347.Google Scholar
Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Ogunfowora, B., Bourdage, J. S., & Shin, K. H. (2010). The personality bases of socio-political attitudes: The role of honesty-humility and openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 115–119.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., & McGraw, K. M. (Eds.) (1995). Political judgment: Structure and processes. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Luskin, R. (1987). Measuring political sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 856–899.Google Scholar
Luskin, R. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 331–362.Google Scholar
McCann, J. A. (1997). Electoral choices and core value change: The 1992 presidential campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 564–583.Google Scholar
McClosky, H. (1958). Conservativism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52, 27–45.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323–337.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1993). The poli-psy relationship: Three phases of a long affair. In Yengar, S. & McGuire, W. J. (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 9–35). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, W. E., & Shanks, J. M. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., & Ordonez, L. (1993). Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 629–639.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. J., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Hibbing, M. V. (2011). The participatory personality: Evidence from Latin America. British Journal of Political Science, 41, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, J. J., & Halperin, K. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335–362.Google Scholar
Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behaviour. American Political Science Review, 104, 85–110.Google Scholar
Pierce, P. (1993). Political sophistication and the use of candidate traits in candidate evaluation. Political Psychology, 14, 21–35.Google Scholar
Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32, 537–561.Google Scholar
Popkin, S. (1991). The reasoning voter. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personal variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.Google Scholar
Prost, J. M. (Ed.) (2003). The psychological assessment of political leaders. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Riemann, R., Grubich, C., Hempel, S., Mergl, S., & Richter, M. (1993). Personality and attitudes towards current political topics. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 313–321.Google Scholar
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–201.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1956). Political and religious dogmatism: An alternative to the authoritarian personality. Psychological Monographs, 70, 365–375.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rubenzer, S. J., Faschingbauer, T. R., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Assessing the U.S. Presidents using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Assessment, 7, 403–420.Google Scholar
Schoen, H., & Schumann, S. (2007). Personality traits, partisan attitudes, and voting behavior: Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology, 28, 471–498.Google Scholar
Schoen, H., & Steinbrecher, M. (2013). Beyond total effects: Exploring the interplay of personality and attitudes in affecting turnout in the 2009 German federal election. Political Psychology, 34, 533–552.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues 50, 19–45.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In Seligman, C., Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp.1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Basic human values: Their content and structure across cultures. In Tamayo, A. & Porto, J. (Eds.), Valores e trabalho [Values and work]. Brasilia: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Caprara, M. G., Cieciuch, J., … Zaleski, Z. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36, 899–930.Google Scholar
Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24, 783–791.Google Scholar
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review, 79, 293–304.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1995). Rationality in political behavior. Political Psychology, 16, 45–61.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986). Presidential personality: Biographical use of the Gough Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 149–160.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1990). Personality and politics. In Pervin, L. (Ed.), Handbook of personality (pp. 670–692). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M. (1975). Personality and democratic politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2001). Individual differences in information processing. In Tesser, A. & Schwartz, N., Blackwell international handbook of social psychology: Intra-individual processes (Vol. 1). London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014). Integrative complexity at forty: Steps toward resolving the scoring dilemma. Political Psychology, 35, 597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118–126.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief system in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 365–375.Google Scholar
Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying the left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 175–203.Google Scholar
Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In White, R. W. (Ed.), The study of lives (pp. 388–411). Chicago, IL: Atherton.Google Scholar
Van Hiel, A., Kossowska, M., & Mervielde, I. (2000). The relationship between openness to experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 741–751Google Scholar
Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 487–492.Google Scholar
Vecchione, M., Caprara, G. V., Schoen, H., Gonzàlez Castro, J. L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2012). The role of personal values and basic traits in perceptions of the consequences of immigration: A three nation study. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 359–377.Google Scholar
Vecchione, M., Schoen, H., González Castro, J. L., Cieciuch, J., Pavlopoulos, V., & Caprara, G. V. (2011). Personality correlates of party preference: The Big Five in five big European countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 737–742.Google Scholar
Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Schoen, H., Cieciuch, J., Silvester, J., … Alessandri, G. (2015). Personal values and political activism: A cross- national study. British Journal of Psychology, 106, 84–106.Google Scholar
Verba, N., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1987). Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American presidents and elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 196–202.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (1992). Content analysis of archival data, personal documents and everyday verbal productions. In Smith, C. P. (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 110–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, D. G. (2003). Personality and political behavior. In Sears, D. O., Huddy, L. & Jervis, R. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 110–145). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×