Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:18:27.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Consumers and Households

Materialism, Nonmaterialism, and Subjective Well-Being

from Part III - Private Sector Consumer Behaviour and the Firm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

Alan Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

11.5 References

Akay, A., Bargain, O., Dolls, M., Neumann, D., Peichl, A., and Siegloch, S. (2012). Happy Taxpayers? Income Taxation and Well-Being. Bonn: IZA Discussion Paper No. 6999.Google Scholar
Altman, M. (2015). Real-World Decision Making: An Encyclopedia of Behavioral Economics. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonides, G. (2007). Income Evaluation and Happiness in the Case of an Income Decline. Kyklos, 60(4), 467484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonides, G. (2008). Comparing Models of Consumer Behavior. In: Lewis, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behavior (pp. 227252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonides, G. (2011a). The Division of Household Tasks and Household Financial Management. Journal of Psychology, 219(4), 198208.Google Scholar
Antonides, G. (2011b). Behavioral Economics Applied: Suggestions for Policy Making. In: Martin, P., Cheung, F., Kyrios, M., , L. et al. (Eds.). The IAAP Handbook of Applied Psychology (pp. 500524). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonides, G. (2018). Research Methods for Economic Psychology. In: Ranyard, R. (Ed.) Economic Psychology: The Science of Economic Mental Life and Behavior. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Antonides, G., and Cramer, L. (2013). Impact of Limited Cognitive Capacity and Feelings of Guilt and Excuse on the Endowment Effects for Hedonic and Utilitarian Types of Foods. Appetite, 68, 5155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonides, G., De Groot, I. M., and Van Raaij, W. F. (2011). Mental Budgeting and the Management of Household Finance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 546555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonides, G., and Kroft, M. (2005). Fairness Judgments in Household Decision Making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 902913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonides, G., and Ranyard, R. (2018). Mental Accounting and Economic Behavior. In: Ranyard, R. (Ed.), Economic Psychology: The Science of Economic Mental Life and Behavior. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Apps, P. F., and Rees, R. (1997). Collective Labor Supply and Household Production. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 178190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2007). From ‘the Family’ to ‘Families’: How Individualisation and Globalisation Are Changing Our Personal Lives. Soundings, 35(1), 105114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal, 75, 493517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1991). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belch, M. A., and Willis, L. A. (2002). Family Decision at the Turn of the Century: Has the Changing Structure of Households Impacted the Decision-Making Process? Journal of Consumer Behavior, 2(2), 111124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in a Material World. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 265280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bii, H. K., and Wanyama, P. (2001). Automation and Its Impact on the Job Satisfaction Among the Staff of the Margaret Thatcher Library, Moi University. Library Management, 22(6/7), 303310.Google Scholar
Brandwatch (2015).The Twitter Happiness Report. Brighton, UK: Brandwatch.Google Scholar
Browning, M., Chiappori, P. A., and Lechene, V. (2006). Collective and Unitary Models: A Clarification. Review of Economics of the Household, 4, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickman, P., and Coates, D. (1987). Commitment and Mental Health. In: Brickman, P. (Ed.), Commitment, Conflict, and Caring (pp. 222309). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Burchardt, T. (2005). Are One Man’s Rags Another Man’s Riches? Identifying Adaptive Expectations Using Panel Data. Social Indicators Research, 74(1), 57102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoyne, C. B., Reibstein, J., Edmunds, A., and Dolman, V. (2007). Money Management Systems in Early Marriage: Factors Influencing Change and Stability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 214228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, N., and Sanderson, C. A. (1999). Life Task Participation and Well-Being: The Importance of Taking Part in Daily Life. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 230243). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Carriero, R., Ghysels, J., and Van Klaveren, C. (2009). Do Parents Coordinate Their Work Schedules? A Comparison of Dutch, Flemish, and Italian Dual-Earner Households. European Sociological Review, 25(5), 603617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P. A. (1988). Rational Household Labor Supply. Econometrica, 56(1), 6390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P. A. (1997). Introducing Household Production in Collective Models of Labor Supply. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 191209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., and Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, L., and Antonides, G. (2011). Endowment Effects for Hedonic and Utilitarian Food Products. Food Quality and Preference, 22, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delhey, J. (2009). World Values Research, 2(2), 3054.Google Scholar
Dia Sow, F. (2010). Intrahousehold Resource Allocation and Well-Being. Wageningen: PhD thesis, Wageningen University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., and MacCulloch, R. (2010). Happiness Adaptation to Income and to Status in an Individual Panel. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76, 834852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbelsteen, S., and Kooreman, P. (1997). Financial Management, Bargaining and Efficiency Within the Household: An Empirical Analysis. De Economist, 145, 345366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, P. S., Harris, K. D., Kloumann, I. M., Bliss, C. A., and Danforth, C. M. (2011). Temporal Patterns of Happiness and Information in a Global Social Network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e26752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., and White, M. (2008). Do We Really Know What Makes Us Happy? A Review of the Economic Literature on the Factors Associated with Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, R. Y., and Kamakura, W.A. (2006). Household Life Cycles and Lifestyles in the United States. Journal of Marketing Research (February), 121132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin, R. A. (2005). A Puzzle for Adaptive Theory. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56, 513521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison Income Effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 9971019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fofana, N. B., Antonides, G., Niehof, A., and Van Ophem, J. A. C. (2015). How Microfinance Empowers Women in Côte d’Ivoire. Review of Economics of the Household, 13, 10231041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H., and Cartwright, E. (2013). Microeconomics and Behavior. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S., and Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, Economy and Institutions. Economic Journal, 110(466), 918938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S., and Stutzer, A. (2002). What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B., and Stutzer, A. (2012). The Use of Happiness Research for Public Policy. Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 659674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., and Shields, M. A. (2004). Investigating the Patterns and Determinants of Life Satisfaction in Germany Following Reunification. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 649674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gombolay, M. C., Gutierrez, R. A., Clarke, S. G., Sturla, G. F., and Shah, J. A. (2015). Decision-Making Authority, Team Efficiency, and Human Worker Satisfaction in Mixed Human-Robot Teams. Autonomous Robots, 39(3), 293312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenglass, E., Antonides, G., Christandl, F., Foster, G., Katter, J. K. Q., Kaufman, B. E., and Lea, S. E. G. (2014). The Financial Crisis and Its Effects: Perspectives from Economics and Psychology. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 50, 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greendex (2014). Consumer Choice and the Environment: A Worldwide Tracking Survey. Retrieved from environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/greendex, 14 March 2016.Google Scholar
Güth, W., and Kocher, M. G. (2013). More Than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature. Munich: CESifo Working Paper No. 4380.Google Scholar
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., and Ukkonen, A. (2016). The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, G. W., and List, J. A. 2004. Field Experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 10091055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haussmann, R., Tyson, L. D., and Zahidi, S. (2010). The Global Gender Gap Report 2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., and Sachs, J. (2016). World Happiness Report 2016, Update (Vol. I). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, S., Santos, C., Sevilla, A., and Sofer, C. (2013). Sharing of Resources Within the Family and the Economics of Household Decision Making. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75 (June), 625639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, W., Vohs, K. D., and Baumeister, R. F. (2012). What People Desire, Feel Conflicted About, and Try to Resist in Everyday Life. Psychological Science, 23(6), 582588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsee, C. K. (1996). The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 247257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsee, C. K., Rottenstreich, Y., and Stutzer, A. (2012). Suboptimal Choices and the Need for Experienced Individual Well-Being in Economic Analysis. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(1), 6385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., and Baker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., and Welzel, C. (2008). Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D. (1994). New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 1836.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective Happiness. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 325). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Deaton, A. (2010). High Income Improves Evaluation of Life but Not Emotional Well-Being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 1648916493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 13251347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1991). The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and the Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (Eds.) (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapteyn, A., Van Praag, B. M. S., and Van Herwaarden, F. G. (1978). Individual Welfare Functions and Social Reference Spaces. Economics Letters, 1, 173177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, E., Rodler, C., Hoelzl, E., and Meier, K. (2001). Conflict and Decision Making in Close Relationships. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Knight, J., Song, L., and Gunatilaka, R. (2009). Subjective Well-Being and Its Determinants in Rural China. China Economic Review, 20, 635649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, S. B. (1970). The Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption. Economic Journal, 97, 666684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the Set-Point Model of Subjective Well-Being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 7579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, S., and Pollak, R. (1993). Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 9881010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, S., Pollak, R., and Wales, T. J. (1997). Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the U.K. Child Benefit. Journal of Human Resources , 32(3), 463480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrian, B. C., and Shea, D. F. (2001). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 11491187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manser, M., and Brown, M. (1980). Marriage Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis. International Economic Review, 21, 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality, 2nd edition. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D., Loewenstein, G., and Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards. Science, 306(5695), 503507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElroy, M. B., and Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-Bargained Household Decisions: Toward a Generalization of the Theory of Demand. International Economic Review, 22, 333349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melenberg, B. (1992). Micro-econometric Models of Consumer Behavior and Welfare. PhD thesis, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Mencarini, L., and Sironi, M. (2012). Happiness, Housework and Gender Inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 203219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., and Raskoff Zeiss, A. (1972). Cognitive and Attentional Mechanisms in Delay of Gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(2), 204218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, A. (1983). The Nine American Lifestyles: Who We Are and Where We’re Going. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. (1988). The Role of Intergenerational Transfers and Life-Cycle Saving in the Accumulation of Wealth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2, 1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullainathan, S., and Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
National Geographic (2014). Greendex 2014: Consumer Choice and the Environment: A Worldwide Tracking Survey. London: Globescan.Google Scholar
Nielsen (2014). Nielsen Global Survey. Retrieved from www.nielsen.com, 14 March 2016.Google Scholar
Nielsen (2015). The Sustainability Imperative: New Insights on Consumer Expectations. New York: Nielsen.Google Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2015). How’s Life? 2015. Measuring Well-Being. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oishi, S., and Kesebir, S. (2015). Income Inequality Explains Why Economic Growth Does Not Always Translate to an Increase in Happiness. Psychological Science, 26(10), 16301638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onwezen, M. C., Antonides, G., and Bartels, J. (2013). The Norm Activation Model: An Exploration of the Functions of Anticipated Pride and Guilt in Environmental Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 141153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onwezen, M. C., Bartels, J., and Antonides, G. (2014a). The Self-Regulatory Function of Anticipated Pride and Guilt in a Sustainable and Healthy Consumption Context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44 (1), 5368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onwezen, M. C., Bartels, J., and Antonides, G. (2014b). Environmentally Friendly Consumer Choices: Cultural Differences in the Self-Regulatory Function of Anticipated Pride and Guilt. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 239248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, J. (2000). Couples and Their Money: Patterns of Accounting and Accountability in the Domestic Economy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(4), 502517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pine, J., and Gilmore, J. (1999). The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K., and Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 7987.Google Scholar
Richins, M. L., and Dawson, S. (1992). A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. T., and Simonson, I. (1991). Evaluations of Pairs of Experiences: A Preference for Happy Endings. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 273282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solnick, S. J., and Hemenway, D. (1998). Is More Always Better? A Survey on Positional Concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37, 373383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, B., and Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 103(3), 598604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutzer, A., and Frey, B. (2006). Does Marriage Make People Happy, or Do Happy People Get Married? Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 326347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 12, 183–206.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112 (1), S164S187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An Economic Theory of Self-Control. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L. (2005). Experientialism, Materialism, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 132142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Troost, A., Matthijs, K., Vermulst, A. A., Gerris, J. R. M., and Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J. (2006). Effects of Spousal Economic and Cultural Factors on Dutch Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(2), 235262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, J., Antonides, G., and Schillewaert, N. (2014). The Effects of Co-creation Claim on Consumer Brand Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38,110118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Klaveren, C. (2009). The Intra-Household Allocation of Time. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute Research Series (459), Thela Thesis Academic Publishing Services.Google Scholar
Van Klaveren, C., and Ghysels, J. (2012). Collective Labor Supply and Child Care Expenditures: Theory and Application. Journal of Labor Research, 33(2), 196224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Klaveren, C. & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2007). Intra-Household Work Time Synchronization, Togetherness or Material Benefits? Social Indicators Research, 84(1), 3952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Klaveren, C., Maassen van den Brink, H., and Van Praag, B. M. S. (2012). Intra-Household Work Timing: The Effect on Joint Activities and the Demand for Child Care. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Klaveren, C., Van Praag, B. M. S., and Maassen van den Brink, H. (2008). A Public Good Version of the Collective Model: An Empirical Approach with an Application to British Household Data. Review of Economics of the Household, 6(2), 169191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Klaveren, C., Van Praag, B. M. S., and Maassen van den Brink, H. (2011). Collective Labor Supply of Native Dutch and Immigrant Households in the Netherlands. In: Molina, J. A. (Ed.), Household Economic Behaviors (pp. 99119). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Van Praag, B. M. S., and Baarsma, B. E. (2005). Using Happiness Surveys to Value Intangibles: The Case of Airport Noise. Economic Journal, 115(500), 224246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Praag, B. M. S., and Van Weeren, J. (1988). Memory and Anticipation Processes and Their Significance for Social Security and Income Inequality. In: Maital, S. (Ed.) Applied Behavioral Economics, Volume II (pp. 731751). Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Van Raaij, W. F., and Antonides, G. (1991). Costs and Benefits of Unemployment and Employment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 667687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verain, M. C. D., Sijtsema, S., Dagevos, H., and Antonides, G. (2017). Attribute Segmentation and Communication Effects on Healthy and Sustainable Diet Intentions. Sustainability, 9(5), 743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, C., Lyonette, C., and Wiggins, R. D. (2008). Money, Power and Spending Decisions in Intimate Relationships. Sociological Review, 56(1), 117143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vohs, K. D. (2013). The Poor’s Poor Mental Power. Science, 341(August), 969970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warr, P. (1999). Well-Being and the Workplace. In: Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 353373). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Welsch, H. (2007). Environmental Welfare Analysis: A Life Satisfaction Approach. Ecological Economics, 62, 544551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsch, H., and Kühling, J. (2010). Pro-environmental Behavior and Rational Consumer Choice: Evidence from Surveys of Life Satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 405420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsch, H. and Kühling, J. (2011). Are Pro-environmental Consumption Choices Utility Maximizing? Evidence from Subjective Well-being Data. Ecological Economics, 72, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A. (2007). A Global Projection of Subjective Well-Being: A Challenge to Positive Psychology? Psychtalk, 56, 1720.Google Scholar
Yang, A. X., Hsee, C. K., Liu, Y., and Zhang, L. (2011). The Supremacy of Singular Subjectivity: Improving Decision Quality by Removing Objective Specifications and Direct Comparisons. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 393404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×