Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:50:51.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Inflexion, Derivation, Compounding

from Part Three - Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2022

By
Chiara Cappellaro  and
Judith Meinschaefer
Edited by
Adam Ledgeway  and
Martin Maiden
Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

This chapter highlights how phenomena found in modern Romance varieties as well as processes of language change pose challenges to the idea that inflexion, derivation, and compounding may reside in distinct modules or components of the grammar. It discusses the basic and uncontroversial characteristics of inflexion, derivation, and compounding with data from Romance languages and presents specific topics and case studies that challenge the traditional view from both a synchronic and a diachronic perspective. The first case study considers the ways in which various morphophonological alternations, such as diphthongization and palatalization, pattern alike or differently with respect to inflexion, derivation, and compounding. The question whether inflexion and derivation can be distinguished on semantic grounds is the focus of two further case studies dealing with (i) the formal marking and the semantic interpretation of number in Italian ambigeneric nouns, and (ii) with the different outcomes of the Latin augment /-sc-/ in modern Romance languages, which evolved in some languages into an inflexional marker, while retaining a derivational function in others. A final topic covered is so-called ‘conversion’, defined here as a transpositional (i.e., category-changing) process that is not marked by any formative, and thus applies to fully inflected words.

Keywords

ambigeneric nounsaugmentcompoundingconversionderivationellipsis under coordinationinflexionirregular pluralmorphophonologyprosodic constituency
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 400 - 433
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Acquaviva, P. (2008). Lexical Plurals. A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerman, M. (2015). ‘Introduction’. In Baerman, M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Inflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G. (2006). ‘Inflection and derivation’. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier, 654–61.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1985a). Morphonology. The Dynamics of Derivation. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Forza, F. and Scalise, S. (2016). ‘Compounding’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 524–37.Google Scholar
Hacken, P. Ten (2014). ‘Delineating derivation and inflection’. In Lieber, R. and Stekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10–25.Google Scholar
Karlsson, K. E. (1981). Syntax and Affixation. The Evolution of mente in Latin and Romance. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., and Rainer, F. (eds) (2015). Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. (2014). ‘Delineating derivation and compounding’. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–31.Google Scholar
Rainer, F. (2016). ‘Derivational morphology’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 513–23.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. and Bisetto, A. (2009). ‘The classification of compounds’. In Lieber, R. and Štekauer, P. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 34–53.Google Scholar
Štekauer, P. (2015a). ‘The delimitation of derivation and inflection’. In Müller, P. O., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S., and Rainer, F. (eds), Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter, 218–34.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×