Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:06:32.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Anthony Giddens, Structuration Theory, and Radical Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

By
Rob Stones
Edited by
Peter Kivisto
Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

The chapter argues that weaknesses in Anthony Giddens’s later work on “third-way” politics are a consequence of its neglect of the best instincts of his earlier, seminal work on structuration theory. The argument proceeds through reflective exposition and analysis of successive stages of Giddens’s writings, from the structuration theory and historical sociology of the 1970s and 1980s, through his wide-ranging and profound theoretical insights into radicalized modernity in the 1990s, to his subsequent strategic interventions in contemporary politics. The essay concludes by making the case for an alternative, more progressive politics grounded in a stronger version of structuration theory.

Rob Stones is Professor of Sociology in the School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, Australia. In 2005 he published Structuration Theory (Palgrave Macmillan), which developed the approach of strong structuration theory (SST) to inform empirical case study research. Recent publications include: Key Sociological Thinkers, 3rd edition (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017); and, coauthored with Bryan S. Turner, “Successful Societies: Decision-Making and the Quality of Attentiveness,” The British Journal of Sociology (2020).

Keywords

Disembeddingexcessive instrumental reasoningradicalized modernitystrong structuration theory (SST)structuration theorythird-way politics
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory , pp. 395 - 421
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, Margaret. 1995. Realist Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc. 2011 [2009]. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Trans. Elliott, Gregory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Laurent, Thévenot. 2006 [1991]. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Trans. Porter., Catherine Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977 [1972]. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1990 [1980]. The Logic of Practice. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, Christopher G. A. 1992. ‘Sociology without Philosophy? The Case of Anthony Giddens’s Structuration Theory.’ Sociological Theory 10: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coad, Alan, Jack, Lisa, and Kholeif, Ahmed (eds.). 2016. Special Issue on Strong Structuration Theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 29(7).Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1971. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Volume 1: Power, Property, and the State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1985. The Nation-State and Violence: A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Volume 2. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1993. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1994. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1998. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 2000. The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 2002a. Where Now for New Labour? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 2002b. Runaway World: How Globalisation is Reshaping Our Lives, 2nd edition. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 2007a. Over to You, Mr Brown. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 2007b. Europe in the Global Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 2009. The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 2014. Turbulent and Mighty Continent: What Future for Europe? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony and Diamond, Patrick (eds.). 2005. The New Egalitarianism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Trish, Wherton, Joe, Sugarhood, Paul, Hinder, Sue, Procter, Rob, and Stones, Rob. 2013. ‘What Matters to Older People with Assisted Living Needs? A Phenomenological Analysis of the Use and Non-use of Telehealth and Telecare.’ Social Science and Medicine 93: 86–94.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Trish, Stones, Rob, and Swinglehurst, Deborah. 2014. ‘Choose and Book: A Sociological Analysis of Resistance to an Expert System.’ Social Science and Medicine, 104: 210–219.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter, and Lamont, Michèle (eds.). 2013. Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter, and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 2009. ‘Health, Social Relations, and Public Policy.’ In Hall, Peter and Lamont, Michèle (eds.), Successful Societies: How Institutions and Culture Affect Health (pp. 82–103). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John 2017. ‘Harold Garfinkel.’ In Stones, Rob (ed.), Key Sociological Thinkers, 3rd edition, (pp. 188–200). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hutton, Will, and Giddens, Anthony. 2000. ‘Anthony Giddens and Will Hutton in Conversation.’ In Hutton, Will and Giddens, Anthony (eds.), On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism (pp. 1–51). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alisdair. 1981. After Virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Margalit, Avishai. 2002. The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos. 1991. Back to Sociological Theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos 2008. Modern and Postmodern Social Theorizing: Bridging the Divide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, Karen. 2012. International Migration and Social Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew. 2005. The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, Andrew 2011. Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya, 1999. Development as Freedom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
SewellJr., William. 1992. ‘A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformations.’ American Journal of Sociology 98: 1–29.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob. 1991. ‘Strategic Context Analysis: A New Research Strategy for Structuration Theory.’ Sociology 25(3): 673–695.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 1996. Sociological Reasoning. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 2001. ‘Refusing the Realism-Structuration Divide.’ European Journal of Social Theory 4(2): 177–197.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 2005. Structuration Theory. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 2014a. ‘Social Theory and Current Affairs: A Framework for Greater Intellectual Engagement.’ British Journal of Sociology 65(2): 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stones, Rob 2014b. ‘Strengths and Limitations of Luc Boltanski’s On Critique.’ In Turner, Bryan and Susen, Simon (eds.), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’ (pp. 211–234). London, Delhi, New York: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 2015. Why Current Affairs Needs Social Theory. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 2017a. ‘Political Sociology and Political Theory.’ In William, Outhwaite and Stephen, Turner (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Sociology (vol. 1, pp. 256–275). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob 2017b. ‘Sociology’s Other Unspoken Weakness: Bringing Epistemology Back in.’ Journal of Sociology 53(4): 730–752.Google Scholar
Stones, Rob, and Jack., Lisa 2016. ‘The Bridge between Ontological Concepts and Empirical Evidence: An Interview with Rob Stones.’ Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 29(7): 1145–1151.Google Scholar
White, Stephen K. 1988. The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice & Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×