Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:41:09.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 17 - The Sociology of Science and Technology

from Part IV - Specialty Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2017

Kathleen Odell Korgen
Affiliation:
William Paterson University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
Specialty and Interdisciplinary Studies
, pp. 166 - 177
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, Barry. 1982. The Science-Technology Relationship: A Model and a Query. Social Studies of Science 12(2): 166172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1986. Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction: la domestication des coquilles saint-jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de saint-brieuc. L'Année Sociologique 36: 169208.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. 1990. Puritanism and the Rise of Modern Science: The Merton Thesis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, J. and Cole, S.. 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cole, J. and Zuckerman, H.. 1975. The Emergence of a Scientific Specialty: The Self-Exemplifying Case of the Sociology of Science. In The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of R. K. Merton. Edited by Coser, L.. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 139174.Google Scholar
Cole, Stephen. 1992. Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry. M. and Evans, Rob. 2002. The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry. M. and Evans, Rob. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, Lynn. 2004. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy N. 1998. The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Rob and Plows, A.. 2007. Listening without Prejudice?: Re-Discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen. Social Studies of Science 37(6): 827853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas H. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hess, David. 2007. Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, A. 2006. The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the “New” Scientific Governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., and Tutton, R.. 2007. Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue. Social Studies of Science 37(3): 385411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1984. Les Microbes: guerre et paix, suivi de Irreductions. Paris: Editions A.-M. Metailie.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1991. Nous n'avons jamais été modernes: essai d'anthropologie symétrique. Paris: Editions La Découverte.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1996[1993]. Aramis ou l'Amour des Techniques. Paris. La Découverte. Translated by Porter, C., Aramis or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Law, John. 2002. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, K. 2006. Inequalities, Knowledge and Public Deliberation: Three Consensus Conferences in Taiwan. Proceeding of EASTS Conference, 128.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, Cole, Simon A., Ruth McNally, and Kathleen Jordan. 2010. Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 1981. Statistics in Britain: 1865–1930. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 1990. Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Miwao. 2010. Theoretical Challenges for the Current Sociology of Science and Technology: A Prospect for Its Future Development. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 4(1): 129136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Miwao. 2014. The “Structural Disaster” of the Science-Technology-Society Interface. In Reflections on the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident. Edited by Ahn, J., Carson, C., Jensen, M., Juraku, K., Nagasaki, S., and Tanaka, S.. Heidelberg: Springer, 189215.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1936. The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review 1: 894904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1938. Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England. Osiris IV(2): 360632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1970. Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England. New York, NY: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mullins, Nicholas C. 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 1984. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. ed. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T. J. and Trocco, F.. 2004. Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, H. 2007. Talking Shops or Talking Turkey?: Institutionalizing Consumer Representation in Risk Regulation. Science, Technology and Human Values 32(5): 582607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Simon, Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Technology and Culture. 1991 Dialogue: Theory and Narrative in the History of Technology. Technology and Culture 32(2): 365393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, R. ed. 1979. On the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Whitley, Richard D. 1972. Black Boxism and the Sociology of Science: A Discussion of the Major Development of the Field. In The Sociological Review Monograph 18: The Sociology of Science. Edited by Halmos, P. and Albrow, M.. Keele: University of Keele, 6192.Google Scholar
Woolgar, Steve and Pawluch, D.. 1985. Ontological Gerry-Mandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations. Social Problems 32(3): 214227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, Brian. 1996a. SSK's Identity Parade: Signing-Up and Off-and-on. Social Studies of Science 26(2): 357391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, Brian. 1996b. Misunderstood Misunderstandings: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science. In Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Edited by Irwin, A. and Wynne, B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, H. 1977. Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×