Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:46:30.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Managing Distributed Work

Theorizing an IPO Framework

from Part IV - Technology in Leadership and Teams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

By
Julia E. Hoch
Edited by
Richard N. Landers
Richard N. Landers
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior , pp. 419 - 440
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 866–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avolio, B. J. & Kahai, S. S. (2003). Adding the “E” to e-leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S. S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 615–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, T. S. & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. J., Cober, R. T., Kane, K., Levy, P. E., & Shalhoop, J. (2006). Proactive personality and the successful job search: A field investigation with college graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 717–726CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, J. R. & George, J. F. (2004). Media appropriateness in the conduct and discovery of deceptive communication: The relative influence of richness and synchronicity. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, J. R. & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experimental nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clampitt, P. G. & Downs, C. W. (2004). Downs-Hazen communication satisfaction questionnaire. In Downs, C. W. & Adrian, A. D. (Eds.), Assessing organizational communication. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., Conlon, D. E., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curry, A., Flett, P., & Hollingsworth, I. (2006). Managing information and systems: The business perspective. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior. 6:, 191–233.Google Scholar
Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. D. & Bryant, J. L. (2003). Influence at a distance: Leadership in global virtual teams. Advances in Global Leadership, 3, 303–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, A. R. & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Proc. 32nd Hawaii International Conference System Science, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32, 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. R. (1998). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/3/4/JCMC347/4584413.Google Scholar
Downs, C. W. & Adrian, A. D. (2004). Assessing organizational communication. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dulebohn, J. H. & Martocchio, J. J. (1998). Employee perceptions of the fairness of work group incentive plans. Journal of Management, 24, 469–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulebohn, J. H. & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 569–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13, 128–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 685–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, J. & Mattarelli, E. (2016). Building bridges in global virtual teams: The role of multicultural brokers in overcoming the negative effects of identity threats on knowledge sharing across subgroups. Journal of International Management Studies, 23, 399–411.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J., Gibbs, J. L., & Erhardt, N. (2016). The role of vertical and shared leadership in virtual team collaboration. In Graham, C. M. (Ed.), Strategic management and leadership for systems development in virtual spaces. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. P. J. (2006). System breakdown: the role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 576–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraj, S. & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46, 1554–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Kevin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, 2, 245–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. & Zimbardo, P. G. (2002). Psychology and life, 16/e. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J., Eisenberg, J., Rozaidi, N., & Gryaznova, A. (2015). The “Megapozitiv” role of enterprise social media in enabling cross-boundary communication in a distributed Russian organization. American Behavior Scientist, 59, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilleard, J. D. & Rees, D. R. (1998). Alternative workplace strategies in Hong Kong. Facilities, 16 (5/6), 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, A. (2010). Computer fundamentals. Dehli: Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
Goodhue, D. & Thompson, R. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual-performance. MIS Quart, 19, 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. O. (1995). System engineering planning and enterprise identity. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In Lorsch, J. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Harrison, A., Wheeler, P., & Whitehead, C. (2003). Distributed workplace: Sustainable work environments. London: Spon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S. & Kiesler, S. (2002). Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoch, J. E. (2007). Verteilte Führung in virtuellen Teams: Zum Einfluss struktureller, interaktionaler und teambasierter Führungstechniken auf den Teamerfolg [Distributed leadership in virtual teams]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Hoch, J. E. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management systems implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoch, J. E. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2017). Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: A theoretical framework. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 678–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoch, J. E. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 390–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogg, M.A., Abrams, D., & Martin, G.N. (2010). Social cognition and attitudes. In Martin, G.N., Carlson, N.R., & Buskist, W. (Eds.), Psychology (pp. 646–677). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Houghton, J. D. & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 672–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. M. & Hall-Merenda, K. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. M., Neufeld, D. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2005). Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. P. & Dorfman, P. W. (1986). Leadership and substitutes for leadership among professional and non-professional workers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, S. (1977). Substitutes for leadership: Some implications for organizational design. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 8, 135–146.Google Scholar
Kerr, S. & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L. & Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & McPherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team distributed work success: Lessons from Sabre. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 67–79.Google Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face-interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouzes, J. M. & Posner, B. Z. (2009). To lead, create a shared vision. Harvard Business Review, 87, 20–21.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R. & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). New York, NY: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manz, C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, C. C. & Neck, C. P. (2004). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence (3rd edn). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP). Small Group Research, 22, 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, S. & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neck, C. P. & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 270–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, M. & Wymer, T. D. (2010). The metrics of distributed work: Financial and performance benefits of an emerging work model. Retrieved from www.knoll.com/document/1352940439564/WP_DistributedWork.pdf.Google Scholar
Purvanova, R. K. & Bono, J. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, K. O. & Ha Kim, J. (2007). Successful distributed work arrangements: A developmental approach. Journal of Facilities Management, 5(2), 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynes, S. L. & Gerhart, B. (2000). Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. (2005). Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 571–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout and: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheer, C. V. & Chen, L. (2004). Improving media richness theory: A study of interaction goals, message valence, and task complexity in manager-subordinate communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, S. J. & Peppas, S. C. (2004). An examination of media richness theory in product Web site design: An empirical study. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 6 (4), 270–281.Google Scholar
Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Avolio, B. J., & Jung, D. I. (2002). A longitudinal model of the effects of team leadership and group potency on group performance. Group & Organization Management, 27, 66–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J. & Walther, J. B. (2016). Media effects: Theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warkentin, M. & Beranek, P. M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9, 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (2009). Leading organizational learning: Reflections on theory and research. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J. & Bader, P. (2003). E-leadership and the challenges of leading e-teams: Minimizing the bad and maximizing the good. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelle, J. (2010). Python programming: An introduction to computer science (2nd edn.) Portland, OR: Franklin, Beedle, & Associates.Google Scholar
Zigurs, I. (2003). Leadership in virtual team distributed works: Oxymoron or opportunity? Organizational Dynamics, 31, 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×